User talk:Calypsomusic

Welcome

I like your username. Have you thought about contributing to our articles on the art form? It's in sore need of work. Guettarda (talk) 18:25, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:20, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am working for Integral Humaism for a short while, I think you might be interested to make edits.

I checked the original page Integral humanism (India) and it is in dire need of improvement. BJP page editor who claimed to have worked on integrating this into the party's page and no academic sources has tagged this quite a few months back. So, now, I do want to work on it myself. I am collecting content randomly in my userspace here: User:Jyoti.mickey/IH. I have added 5 academic references and I have 7 more to go through. I will dot he trimming then and merge into main article. It can take some time. As you raised the concern about this topic I consider that you may be interested in working on this. Regards. --Jyoti (talk) 18:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I completed my editing there, and removed my user space page. Integral humanism (India) is now much improved. You may want to edit the entire article in one shot for readability and coherence. --Jyoti (talk) 17:43, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would be interested in improving Sanskrit?

Thank you. --AmritasyaPutra^T 18:13, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Voice of India

Heuze doesn't say anything that had been written in the article. You can see that as well when you read that book. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:02, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cannot believe what you think. You have to give exact quotation of Heuze or any other citation that would support your change. Bladesmulti (talk) 02:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also stop moving According to his own.. to reception. Bladesmulti (talk) 02:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARBIPA notification

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Please make sure that you read and follow all the Wikipedia policies that come up during the discussion. Failure to do so would constitute disruptive editing and may invite sanctions under WP:ARBIPA. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 10:13, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Enforcement

I have requested Arbitration enforcement against you. The relevant discussion can be found here [1]. Vanamonde93 (talk) 13:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You ought to express yourself in less words by, perhaps.. avoid repeating yourself, and use spell check. Also, you must give diffs to help the reader, your flowing commentary is difficult to fully grasp. --AmritasyaPutra^T 13:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ratification of collage at Talk:Bengali people

Hi, you previously voted in a poll at Talk:Bengali people to decide on whose pictures are to appear in a collage at Bengali people. The poll has now closed and a request for ratification of the final list has been sent out. If you wish to do so, please come to Talk:Bengali people thanks Coolabahapple (talk) 19:00, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marknutley

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marknutley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

this is wp:outing

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Outing

Please refrain from outing me again Darkness Shines (talk) 17:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an outing. You have made the association in the past and it is common knowledge.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 18:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In case you forgot saying this.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 18:20, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your comments

I've cleaned up some of your comments because you forgot to sign them [2][3]. Please sign your comments in the future. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:30, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Calypsomusic. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Symbolism of the Cross

The article The Symbolism of the Cross has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find no evidence that this meets the notability threshold for books.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanamonde (talk) 05:50, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Man and his Becoming according to the Vedanta

The article Man and his Becoming according to the Vedanta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find sufficient coverage in reliable sources for this to meet our basic threshold for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanamonde (talk) 09:24, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]