User talk:Akhil.bharathan

Welcome

Hello, Akhil.bharathan, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

As you have just started editing, I hope you find the following selection of links helpful and that they provide you with some ideas for how to get the best out of Wikipedia.

Happy editing! Fæ (talk) 07:12, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Guide for younger editors
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles Request departments
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Guidance on footnotes

Footnotes can be added inline to the body of your text using <ref> tags. An example looks like:

JavaScript is used on webpages today.<ref>Smith, John (2005), ''JavaScript 101'', ISBN 938223445333</ref>

And the resultant text would look like: JavaScript is used on webpages today.¹

With the superscript 1 being a link to a footnote at the bottom of the page automatically created by inserting the code: {{reflist}}

An easy to follow standard guide is at Referencing for beginners with citation templates, an online video demonstration can be played at Footnotes demo.ogv and a primer for general editing is at How to edit a page. Thanks, Fæ (talk) 07:13, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chaitya Bhoomi concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chaitya Bhoomi, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:00, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Chaitya Bhoomi

Hello Akhil.bharathan. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Chaitya Bhoomi.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chaitya Bhoomi}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akhil.bharathan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Pardon me once again User:PhilKnight. I am not a sock puppet of any other account. Please recheck. This is absolutely wrong as you are trying to label me as a sock puppet. I am not a sock puppet of any other user.Bladesmulti is wrong. Why would I use any other Id when I already have one? This is by mistake that I have been blocked for infinity. Akhil.bharathan (talk) 17:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The technical evidence supporting the block is just a smidgen short of being confirmed. That coupled with the strong behavioral evidence makes this an easy decline. Bbb23 (talk) 18:08, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akhil.bharathan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Believe me for God's sake that I am not a Sock-puppet. I swear it is a big mistake. Please re-check it before you take this negative action. Come on! Please for God's sake. Akhil.bharathan (talk) 18:33, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Behavioral evidence + technical evidence make it pretty obvious that you've created multiple accounts to push the same POV. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:35, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NQ. It is not mistake that I typed after watching the Akshatra message. However I again plea for rechecking the block implemented on me. This is quite harsh.Akhil.bharathan (talk) 08:08, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akhil.bharathan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:OhNoitsJamie tell me what I have to clearly state in writing to get unblocked. My edits were not so harmful. Please allow me to edit wikipedia. I humbly request and beg you.Akhil.bharathan (talk) 1:33 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

It's not a question of whether your edits were harmful or not. The evidence for socking is very strong and that's why you're blocked. I'm going to block you from editing this page and you can appeal from your original account. Please read Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks#Sockpuppetry_blocks for what options are available to you. regentspark (comment) 19:30, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We don't unblock sockpuppets. You'll need to make the request from your original account (Siddheart).OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:03, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]