User talk:DPUH/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:DPUH. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Welcome!
Hello, DPUH, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
Renaming articles
To rename articles, please follow the instructions at WP:Requested moves -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 06:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kreshnik Krasniqi
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Karl 334 Talk--Contribs 22:03, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kreshnik Krasniqi
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kreshnik Krasniqi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:52, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Transfermarkt
Since most of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles, as you did with Hønefoss BK. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Conor Masterson
The article Conor Masterson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Daniel Cleary (footballer)
The article Daniel Cleary (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
A quick technicality before I reply to your comment, please post new comments to talk pages at the bottom. This way comments are conveniently listed in chronological order. Using the "new section" tab at the top of most talk pages will do this for you automatically. As for the deletions, in order to have an article on Wikipedia footballer must meet the criteria laid out at WP:NFOOTBALL, which says that he must have played in a fully professional league or for his country's national team. The guideline goes on to specify for the purposes of this guideline, played means having appeared in a match either in the starting line-up or coming on as a substitute. Simply being signed to a club without playing is insufficient. While it's not explicitly stated in the guideline, general consensus is that it applies only to competitive fixtures, so Cleary's pre-season debut doesn't qualify him for an article either. As for Jake Brimmer, the most likely reason that the article hasn't been deleted is that no one has noticed. Since anyone can write anything on Wikipedia, other stuff exists is never a valid reason for keeping an article. I hope that clears things up. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
The article Juan Antonio Ros has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 11:37, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Xavier Quintillà
- added links pointing to Spanish and Gerard Lopez
- Rodrigo Tarín
- added a link pointing to Chiva
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Juan Antonio Ros
The article Juan Antonio Ros has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:19, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Xavier Quintillà
The article Xavier Quintillà has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Rodrigo Tarín
The article Rodrigo Tarín has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Re: Proposed deletions
For future reference, the WikiProject football maintains a list of fully professional leagues (found at WP:FPL) for use in conjunction with WP:NFOOTBALL. You'll note that Segunda B is not on that list. I hope that clarifies things. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Is there a way to propose the adding of the Segunda B or others (like the Belgian Second Division)? Or would you see no point in doing so if, in your opinion,you wouldn't count them as fully professional? Thank you DPUH (talk) 21:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC) DPUH (talk) 21:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- If you have reliable sources that confirm that these leagues are fully pro, you should present them for evaluation on the talk page of WP:FPL. That being said, given the popularity of football in these countries, Spain in particular, the matter has almost certainly been discussed before, so you may want to take a look through the talk page archive first. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Transfermarkt again
I already explained this to you a few weeks ago, but please do not cite Transfermarkt in articles, as you did with Fabien Tchenkoua. Much of the website's content is user-generated, so it is not considered a reliable source. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Club Barcelona Atlético
- added a link pointing to Luis Ramírez
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hartlepool United F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam Collins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited US Tourcoing FC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Victor Farvacques, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Left-winger and Ireland football team. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, DPUH. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, DPUH. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, DPUH. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
License tagging for File:AVictimOfStars.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AVictimOfStars.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wishing (A Flock of Seagulls album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Reynolds (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hi, when you created your article, you inadvertently included a period at the end of the title. I've moved it to the correct title. Just letting you know for your awareness. 
Schazjmd (talk) 16:01, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:AFOSNightmares.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:AFOSNightmares.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:AFlockOfSeagullsWishing1996.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:AFlockOfSeagullsWishing1996.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:AFlockOfSeagullsGreatestHitsRemixed.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:AFlockOfSeagullsGreatestHitsRemixed.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Paroles et Musique moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Paroles et Musique, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Interstellarity (talk) 14:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Paroles et Musique has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Atlantic306 (talk) 01:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, DPUH
Thank you for creating Paroles et Musique.
User:Atlantic306, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hi , can you please add a reception section with details of referenced reviews in reliable sources such as the LATimes one, also a plot section is needed in your own words- a short plot would be ok for now
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Atlantic306 (talk) 01:27, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Ways to improve B.P.M.: The Very Best of the Beat
Hello, DPUH,
Thank you for creating B.P.M.: The Very Best of the Beat.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please add multiple independent, reliable sources to help strengthen the article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 19:03, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Passions Passion Plays.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:The Passions Passion Plays.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Furniture When the Boom Was On.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Furniture When the Boom Was On.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, DPUH
Thank you for creating Chris Parry (producer).
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 10:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Michael & Miranda
Hello, DPUH, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username North8000, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Michael & Miranda, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael & Miranda.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 12:48, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 10
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Hang On in There Baby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to BMG
- Name and Number (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cassette
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, DPUH
Thank you for creating Sanctuary (The Passions album).
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 13:13, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Alain Morisod
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Alain Morisod requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alain Morisod. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 15:06, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Trans-X On My Own.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Trans-X On My Own.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Purple Hearts Beat That! album.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Purple Hearts Beat That! album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Shrinking File:KajagoogooHangonNow.jpg
Can you shrink File:KajagoogooHangonNow.jpg to a lower res? Copyrightpower1337 (talk) 00:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- Yep, have just done that. DPUH (talk) 11:02, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Track listings
Please note that you should not be changing track listing styles, per WP:STYLEVAR – if a simple numbered list has been established for the album track listing, there is not need to change it to the track listing template. Thank you. Richard3120 (talk) 00:00, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Oh okay, I didn’t realise that, thanks for letting me know DPUH (talk) 08:35, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Whole Lotta Shaky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Young.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve W.L. (album)
Hello, DPUH,
Thank you for creating W.L. (album).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
This article is about the album W.L. - the references have to be about this album in order for the article to pass the standards set in notability for music, in WP:NMUSIC. There is only one review of this album among all the citations. You will need to add more articles about or reviews of this album (when it is released), else it may be proposed for deletion.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 08:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Imagination discography
Hello, DPUH,
Thank you for creating Imagination discography.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Could use references in Video albums & Music videos sections, thanks for the article
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
JW 1961 Talk 19:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Spencer Davis Group discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Kent.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
New Romantic
Hi DPUH, please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music#New Romantic genre; articles about British music shouldn't be written from an American standpoint. 2A02:C7F:3846:4500:D084:DCB6:5660:7E49 (talk) 16:15, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry I wouldn't have reverted your edits if I'd known about this discussion. I've also posted my views on the discussion. DPUH (talk) 19:28, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Orphan tag
Hi DPUH, it is not courteous of you to say that orphan tag is "not true" [1]. My new page patrol tools indicated that it was an orphan, so I tagged it so. Maybe it was the case that you created links after I tagged it... JBchrch talk 11:36, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, @JBchrch: sorry for causing offence, I wasn’t trying to be discourteous, just merely stating that it wasn’t true. By the way, I linked the article a couple of hours ago, so not sure why it would have come up as being an orphan. DPUH (talk) 11:48, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- No worries DPUH, thank you for your apologies. Looking at the article now, the "warning" has disappeared, so it's all good. JBchrch talk 12:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Joe Dassin Ma bonne étoile.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Joe Dassin Ma bonne étoile.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Bend It!
Hi DPUH, I'd like to congratulate you on your recent Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich pages! I had been planning on making a page for "Bend It!" myself recently and wrote a bit for it. I hope you wouldn't have any objections if I added some additional material. Do let me know. All the best. Humbledaisy (talk) 21:50, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, @Humbledaisy: not at all, the more the better! I liked what you did for "Last Night in Soho" by the way. DPUH (talk) 22:24, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, DPUH
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Steve Quinn, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, List of songs recorded by Mud, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - Click the button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Steve Quinn}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Steve Quinn (talk) 02:54, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wondrous Place, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimmy Jones.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
"The official UK "Breakers List""
What is this? You keep adding mentions of it, but without citing a source. Where is the information from? Is it a reliable source? Is it worth mentioning? Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:39, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- The Breakers list was an extension of the UK Singles Chart, published in Music Week, and for a while in Record Mirror, during the 1960s and 70s. It was basically the same as the Billboard Bubbling Under chart, though the Breakers list was mainly a top ten. I've taken the information from ukmix.org, see [2]. As the forum is not deemed a reliable source, I would have to cite the Music Week/Record Mirror issue for each chart position, which I haven't done as that is too time consuming. I'd say it's worth mentioning as it shows the songs that narrowly missed on the Top 50. DPUH (talk) 15:00, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm slightly torn on this. The placings are interesting, and I expect that the listings at www.ukmix.org are probably accurate (no reason to think otherwise) - but, as you say a forum is not a reliable source. Do you have access to original print copies of the music papers? I won't pursue this, but it would be hard to object if another editor comes along and removes the placings you've added on the basis that they are not reliably sourced. The place to discuss this (but you probably wouldn't get the answer you want) is WT:CHARTS. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Some of the print copies can be viewed online at worldradiohistory.com [3], but not all of them are on that site. Okay, thank you, I'll keep that last bit in mind. DPUH (talk) 16:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for November 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of number-one singles in Rhodesia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Il Silenzio.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Focus 8.5 - Beyond the Horizon.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Focus 8.5 - Beyond the Horizon.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Focus Golden Oldies.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Focus Golden Oldies.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
WP:DISCOGSTYLE... maintaining a maximum of 10 columns in discography tables
Hi. Regarding you adding even more charts to Shakin' Stevens discography here, per the example of WP:DISCOGSTYLE and other related guidelines, we should maintain a maximum of 10 columns in any discography table. Any more than 10 decreases the size of text in order to accommodate more columns, so can be an MOS:ACCESSIBILITY problem, and also makes the data unable to be easily scanned not just for desktop users but mobile viewers as well (a significant portion of Wikipedia's readership) have to scroll across to see all of it. I understand there were already 13 columns, but it should be cut down, not have more added to it. Please in future try to select the 10 countries where an artist performed the best or that represent the artist's chart performance the best and leave the rest to either be listed on the separate song or album articles or just off the page per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Just because chart data exists does not mean we should try to fit it in—discography tables are not intended to be nor have never been meant to be exhaustive catalogues of everywhere an artist charted. Thanks. Ss112 07:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. A reminder of this. You have again put 14 columns in one wikitable on Tanita Tikaram discography and Silver Convention discography. I have explained the reasons to you previously but you have ignored me and gone about doing it. Not only that, but you are putting more columns into these tables with unreliable sources. You are using Infodisc for France and Hitparadeitalia for Italy, both of which are listed at WP:BADCHARTS as not fit for inclusion. Can you please select the 10 most noteworthy markets and leave the rest out in future. This applies to all discographies. Thank you. Ss112 13:14, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, I will begrudgingly concede to this. I'll go through the ones I've done and fix them. DPUH (talk) 15:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Ss112: Regarding the Cat Stevens discography: no need to get mad, I'm reducing the ones I've done. I would also say that as per WP:DISCOGSTYLE the maximum of 10 columns is a suggestion, but I do understand why it should be a maximum. DPUH (talk) 16:51, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, I will begrudgingly concede to this. I'll go through the ones I've done and fix them. DPUH (talk) 15:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Amii Stewart Togheter
Hit Parade Italia is the most reliable chart. In Italy we don't have an official one but HPI resume all. So it's the most reliable.--Melfi1980 (talk) 10:04, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
The file File:Bert Weedon Apache.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
superseded and replaced by File:Apache by Bert Weedon UK single side-A.png...
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bert Weedon Apache.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bert Weedon Apache.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Red Lorry Yellow Lorry discography moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Red Lorry Yellow Lorry discography, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:21, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tommy Steele Rock with the Cavemen.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tommy Steele Rock with the Cavemen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
List of number-ones singles of 1979 (Denmark) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of number-ones singles of 1979 (Denmark), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 13:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
List of number-ones singles of 1980 (Denmark) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of number-ones singles of 1980 (Denmark), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 13:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, DPUH
Thank you for creating Public Image Ltd discography.
User:JSFarman, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
What the World Needs Now...is a PiL discography. Really!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|JSFarman}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
JSFarman (talk) 18:32, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited San Bernadino (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
ARIA Bubbling Down Under Charts
I have not been able to validate these charts as legitimate from the citation that you sourced it from. Do you have a source where I can verify that ARIA made listings for the chart positions 101-150? Blake675 (talk) 15:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Blake675: Unfortunately I can't, but there are numerous examples on Wikipedia that give Australian peaks outside the top 100, as you can email ARIA who seem happy enough to give the information. I then cross-checked these with the peaks given on the Bubbling Down Under blog and they match, so I think it can be trusted. DPUH (talk) 23:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Red Lorry Yellow Lorry discography has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Red Lorry Yellow Lorry discography has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
BuySomeApples (talk) 19:50, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Using InfoDisc and HitParadeItalia as sources
Hi. As I said in my revert summary on Les Enfoirés, and I believe I either pointed out to you in an earlier thread here or another edit summary on a discography, InfoDisc and Hitparadeitalia.it should not be used as sources. Both are listed at WP:BADCHARTS. Neither source's data is even from an official chart—they're fictional chart positions that were calculated retrospectively. Neither source states how they arrived at said chart positions, and both have been determined to be unreliable by editors here. Please do not continue introducing these sources, and if you work your way back around to discographies you have worked on, please remove InfoDisc and Hitparadeitalia where you have used it. Also just a note about footers you may be copying on discographies: anything set at "8pt" or 80% is a violation of MOS:SMALL, as the smallest text that should be used on Wikipedia is 85% of the main text size. Thanks. Ss112 07:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Ss112: Thanks for notifying me about the MOS:SMALL violation, will change. I will stop using those two chart sources. However, there has been an official album chart in France since 1985 (albeit not originally published by SNEP) and it appears that the album chart positions given on InfoDisc after this period are official, which is alluded to on WP:BADCHARTS. I don't know if has been any previous discussion over this, but in the case of Les Enfoirés I don't see why the chart positions can't be kept. Let me know if you think otherwise. Thanks, DPUH (talk) 16:14, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, DPUH
Thank you for creating Gerry and the Pacemakers discography.
User:Alexandermcnabb, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Maybe pop a tag on the talk page?
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alexandermcnabb}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: You Were Made for Me (Freddie and the Dreamers song) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 17:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Discogs
I noticed your use of Discogs at "Albinoni vs Star Wars" and thought you should check this out: WP:RSDISCOGS. Ping me if you have any questions or follow-up thoughts. — Bilorv (talk) 14:36, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:List of number-ones singles of 1979 (Denmark)
Hello, DPUH. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of number-ones singles of 1979 (Denmark), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:List of number-ones singles of 1980 (Denmark)
Hello, DPUH. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of number-ones singles of 1980 (Denmark), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Please make sure column header text is over 85%
Hello. I've just noticed that earlier this month you changed the column headers in the singles wikitable on The Human League discography to use both 90% font size and the small HTML markup. This made the text display below 85% of the normal font size, which is against MOS:SMALL. Please ensure if you're setting text at 85% or 90% that there is no use of small markup where text size is already reduced. Thanks. Ss112 00:54, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Okay thanks, didn't realise I had done that. DPUH (talk) 07:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:List of number-ones singles of 1979 (Denmark)
Hello, DPUH. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of number-ones singles of 1979".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)