User talk:DJdjPollard15

Welcome!

Hello, DJdjPollard15, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 2017 Brit Awards, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2017 Brit Awards

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, 2017 Brit Awards, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Great British Bake Off (series 8)

Hello DJdjPollard15,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Great British Bake Off (series 8) for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 11:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2017 Brit Awards, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Mr X 13:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Britain's Got Talent (series 11)

The article Britain's Got Talent (series 11) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced WP:CRYSTAL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 17:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Great British Bake Off (series 8)

Hello DJdjPollard15,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Great British Bake Off (series 8) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Foysol3195 (talk) 13:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2017 EFL Cup Final

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2017 EFL Cup Final requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2017-18 Manchester United F.C. season

The article 2017-18 Manchester United F.C. season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Speculation as there is no guarantee that this club will even be in the Premier League next season.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 12:28, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:DJdjPollard15/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 13:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! DJdjPollard15, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 13:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Britain's Got Talent (Series 11), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The National Portrait Gallery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Britain's Got Talent (Series 11), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hull. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Capital FM Monster Mash-Up

Hello DJdjPollard15,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Capital FM Monster Mash-Up for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mduvekot (talk) 03:09, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Following My Intuition, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rise & Fall and Walking Away. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about The Great British Bake Off (series 8)

Hello, DJdjPollard15,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The Great British Bake Off (series 8) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great British Bake Off (series 8) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

TheMagikCow (T) (C) 15:22, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Following My Intuition, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rise & Fall and Walking Away. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Voice Kids UK (series 2)

The article The Voice Kids UK (series 2) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced speculation per WP:CRYSTAL. Series 1 doesn't even start till next month.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uncle Roy (talk) 14:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unpredictable (Olly Murs & Louisa Johnson song)

Your article has been redirected for failing WP:NSONGS. If you wish to recreate it, please find reliable sources and create it at Unpredictable (Olly Murs song). Louisa Johnson is a featured artist and we do not credit featured artists in the article title. You also originally created it with a "&" between their names; if Johnson was not featured and did receive equal credit, it should have been "and" as we do not use the ampersand symbol per WP:AMPERSAND. Thank you. Ss 112 04:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Victor Lindelöf, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:28, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. livelikemusic talk! 23:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Daily Mail and The Sun are NOT reliable sources. Do not use them. livelikemusic talk! 04:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic talk! 02:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic talk! 01:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Betway Cup

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DJdjPollard15, thanks for creating Betway Cup!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It is unclear from the article at present how the event is notable, and none of the information is verified.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 14:39, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:ZlatanLegends.png

Thanks for uploading File:ZlatanLegends.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ZlatanLegends.png

A tag has been placed on File:ZlatanLegends.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The X Factor (UK series 14), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop citing the Daily Mail. It is NOT acceptable. Cite it again, and you will be reported. livelikemusic talk! 11:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of For the Gram (Craig David song)

The article For the Gram (Craig David song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable song.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 16:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Pollard

Hello DJdjPollard15,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daniel Pollard for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

GMG ^talk 12:12, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. livelikemusic talk! 19:08, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:22, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Voice UK, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Consider this your final warning. You are clearly not here to edit constructively to this encyclopedia. livelikemusic talk! 13:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DJdjPollard15. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Roberto Firmino.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:09, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Your addition to Bun (hairstyle) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 20:05, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Years & Years UK Tour

The article Years & Years UK Tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that this may meet WP:NTOUR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Laun chba ller 07:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Your addition to Cesc Fàbregas has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Taylor Swift's Reputation Stadium Tour. You have been warned many times not to add unsourced content without a source. And you have added predicted setlist to that article which violates WP:CRYSTAL. Please stop or you will be blocked. Raritydash (talk) 19:52, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edits - March 2018

Hello, I'm GUtt01, and I wanted to let you know that your recent edits on List of Ant & Dec's Saturday Night Takeaway episodes have been reverted because of timing. While it is understandable that there has been a recent development with the programme Saturday Night Takeaway. The issue here, is that at present, while it is confirmed that the fifth episode of the 15th series has been cancelled, there is no information at present regarding the future of the remaining episodes. Until the series has officially ended, regardless of whether the remaining episodes are aired or pulled from broadcast, it would be best to hold off including this information for this article in the respective section. Please be advised, that for the moment, stating that the fifth episode is cancelled is not necessary - it would be best to delist it from the article, and make mention of its cancellation at the suitable time mentioned earlier. GUtt01 (talk) 17:58, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edit - April 2018

This is to inform you that your recent edit on List of Ant & Dec's Saturday Night Takeaway episodes has been reverted because of it going against the policy for WP:NOTNEWS. Listing the details of a series finale is not necessary, per se, but to detail it out in this fashion is unacceptable. Please do not return the information to this article again, except in the appropriate areas *after* the episode has been aired.GUtt01 (talk) 20:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked... Again.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jayron 32 16:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you again, because you have, for the last 5 months, continued the exact same sorts of problems that led to the last block. You seem impervious to self-improvement, and refuse to listen to the numerous attempts to communicate with you regarding Wikipedia's policy regarding the use of reliable sources to add content to Wikipedia. Since your prior block in November, there have been another dozen attempts to get you to change the way you are editing, and you have steadfastly refused to acknowledge any of these, or try to learn Wikipedia policy. Please spend the next few weeks reviewing WP:RS, WP:V, WP:CITE, WP:42, and any of a number of other policies and guidelines so when you return, you can edit properly. If this continues much longer, you may be asked to leave for a much longer time. --Jayron 32 16:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The X Factor (UK series 15)

Hello DJdjPollard15,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The X Factor (UK series 15) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:40, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Following My Intuition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

I noticed in your edit to Antonio Conte that you didn't add any sourced content. As this is the first time you have done it I will be nice to you. Don't do this again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SossieLondon (talk • contribs) 14:14, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2018–19 Chelsea F.C. season, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 19:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2018–19 Manchester United F.C. season, without citing a reliable source. The edits were not constructive, and considered as vandalism. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – Flix11 (talk) 05:15, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Diogo Dalot. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:13, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The X Factor (UK series 15). Consider this your final warning about this behaviour. livelikemusic talk! 12:33, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tahith Chong

The article Tahith Chong has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tahith Chong

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tahith Chong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Capital Up Close

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Capital Up Close, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jmertel23 (talk) 14:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brighter Days Tour

The article Brighter Days Tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NTOUR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of In for a Penny (Stephen Mulhern show) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article In for a Penny (Stephen Mulhern show) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In for a Penny (Stephen Mulhern show) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbarmadillo (talk) 14:33, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tahith Chong

What made you think it was appropriate to create this article when it had already been deleted earlier this year? Nothing has changed with regard to Chong's notability, so that article should not have been recreated. I have tagged it for deletion per speedy deletion criterion G4. – Pee Jay 01:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What makes it worse is that you were the person who created the article last time, so you should know that Chong is not notable. I'm getting pretty sick of having to clear up after you. You seem to have your own agenda when it comes to editing on Wikipedia, and it makes me wonder whether it's worth reporting you to the admins who may block you for being someone who is not here to collaborate on building an encyclopaedia. – Pee Jay 01:33, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tahith Chong

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tahith Chong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 10:59, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Tahith Chong picture.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tahith Chong picture.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:00, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User spamming creation of Tahith Chong. The discussion is about the topic Tahith Chong. – Pee Jay 11:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tahith Chong

Stop recreating that. He hasn't played for the first team yet. If you recreate it you will be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DJdjPollard15. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DJdjPollard15. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2019 Brit Awards

Thanks for creating 2019 Brit Awards.

A New Page Patroller Meatsgains just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 03:38, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jingle Bell Ball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love Made Me Do It (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Pollard

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daniel Pollard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 14:15, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Capital Weekender with Ministry of Sound

Hello DJdjPollard15,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Capital Weekender with Ministry of Sound for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 16:21, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Playlisters) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Playlisters.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for your new article on the show "Playlisters". As more episodes are aired and are noticed by the media, be sure to add more information to the article when it becomes available.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pink

Please do not change "Pink" to "P!NK", as you did on 2019 Brit Awards. "P!NK" is just a stylization, the article refers to her as Pink (singer), so please do not change. Thank you. JE98 (talk) 03:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add "special guest" next to Pink as well, wait until this apparent special guest shows up. Thank you. JE98 (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve No Drama (James Hype song)

Hello, DJdjPollard15,

Thanks for creating No Drama (James Hype song)! I edit here too, under the username Girth Summit and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

There is no claim to notability (see WP:NMUSIC) in the article. At James Hype, I see a claim that this song reached #24 in the UK chart, which would demonstrate notability, but there isn't a source at that article to support the assertion, and since it doesn't say when it was in the chart I wasn't able to find one. If you can find a source to show that it did indeed feature in the UK charts, that would be great.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GirthSummit _(blether) 15:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Global Awards

Hi – as you are one of the major contributors to the articles Global Awards and the spin-off articles 2018 Global Awards and 2019 Global Awards, I am letting you know that I am considering merging all three articles into Global (company)#The Global Awards. I am struggling to find any reliable, independent sources that cover the awards, apart from Global's own media companies (Capital FM, Smooth FM, Classic FM, etc.) or tabloid newspapers like The Sun and The Daily Mail which are not considered acceptable sources for Wikipedia. Please find some independent sources to be able to keep the articles, or I will go ahead and merge them into the parent article. I have stated my proposal at Talk:Global Awards#Merger proposal where you may make any comments. Thank you. Richard3120 (talk) 16:21, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Manchester United Treble Reunion Match) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Manchester United Treble Reunion Match.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I've redirected this - the content can be restored when the event has taken place or when there are more sources to demonstrate notability.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Deb}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Deb (talk) 13:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Callum Booth-Ford moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Callum Booth-Ford, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 20:34, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DJPollard18. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 16:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:45, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DJdjPollard15. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 07:12, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noting most recent sock blocked May 3, 2021. UTRS appeal #42962 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:55, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]