User talk:Raritydash

Status: Busy

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This is Raritydash's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3

Block evasion by User:Cannedcorne

I just wanted to remind you that WP:EVASION states these accounts should be recommended for blocking without warning. I realize this may have been an accident on your part and that's totally fine! I just wanted to be sure you knew! Have a great day/evening/night and thanks for all you contribute! <3 ~ Philipnelson99 (talk) 00:48, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Philipnelson99: Thanks for the fact about the sock puppetry. Actually, that user is actually User:Smallmouthbassboost, the master account, who then create more accounts to vandalize Taylor Swift related articles. It's really driving me crazy and I felt really annoyed by that behavior. I actually used someone's method for that warning when someone is evading a block. Once again, thanks for your suggestion and I will try to keep that in mind. Raritydash (talk) 18:43, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to discussion

Do not know if you would be interested, however, in knowing your experience in editing music-related articles, thought you would like to participate in the discussion here. livelikemusic (TALK!) 21:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, sorry for the late response but I will say it on my talk page as I do not want to get involve with this argument. I do agree that just because the song is included on the album doesn't mean it is a single unless the artist say so and looking at your edits on what are you doing, it does seem to be a valid response and the IP doesn't seem to corporate well. Raritydash (talk) 23:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; it's a case of harassment and Wikihounding right now. Gotta love it. Thank you for contributing your two-cents to the discussion. It truly was not an argument until personal attacks were made, and I refuse to be involved in that. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:48, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure no problem. And you know, I was in this situation too last year like in The Champion (song), I removed "Cry Pretty" as it is not a single for this album like this and then a month later an IP revert me but then revert him/herself. So I'm pretty sure that there is an article that would say that not to add the song that is included on the album unless it is a single confirmed by artist. Raritydash (talk) 00:04, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe there are plenty of them, however, I do not see that making an impact unless multiple editors chime in. Right now, it is a one vs one argument (and the second person is clearly only siding on personal accord). livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:06, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is the difference between a song/single being on an album and being FROM that album?

Can you show this difference objectively using a source? There are a lot of songs which have multiple projects in their infobox, including Better (Khalid song), More (Usher song) and God's Plan (song). Just to name a few. What makes these songs different than "Meant To Be"? Can you show that difference with proof? Not saying you're wrong. Just very curious. Nikki Lee 1999 (talk) 22:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Template:Infobox album#Template:Singles as it explains why we do not add the song that is included on the album unless if the artist confirms that it is a single for the album, then we can add it. As of right now, we need to stick to the policy which I linked. Raritydash (talk) 01:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page Protect

Can you semi protect the Curious George (franchise) page? MLJ 657 (talk) 16:14, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please take this up to WP:RPP. Only an administrator will do that. I won't be able to do that since I'm not an administrator. Sorry. Raritydash (talk) 16:24, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Issue about track listing template

Hi @Raritydash. There's recent discussion for track listing template. If you have time, your comments are always appreciated. 2001:D08:2910:B6D2:17AD:92A:C97:B78A (talk) 17:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]