User talk:Crystallizedcarbon/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Fabrice Elysée Kouadio Kouakou

Hi, Am I being stupid here? I can't see which reference indicates that he has played in a competitive game for his new club. Can you show me where it is please? Fenix down (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

@Fenix down: No problem. Reference number 3 about the match played yesterday in the league game between USM Alger and ES Sétif, shows he came into play at minute 69. (Manucho Kouadio).--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 13:55, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

I was being stupid! Thanks for that. He's definitely notable in my eyes now. I know it sounds petty that all of a sudden after twenty minutes of football he is somehow over the line but that is where the line is and I guess it has to be somewhere! You may have noticed from the WP:FOOTY archives the number of players who have articles created and the editor swears blind they are going to play in the next few weeks for a big club but then they never do, so I hope you don't think me and other editors were being pointy, it's more that having that FPL appearance as a baseline helps make borderline decisions a bit more cut and dry. Fenix down (talk) 16:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

@Fenix down: No problem, I understand. To me WP:GNG seemed established but when I saw that that you guys had a lot more experience on those kind of articles I backed down from the AfD. And I do agree with you. I also encounter way too many articles about football players that don't meet any notability guidelines, especially in the Spanish Wikipedia project.

BTW I would like to get your opinion as an experienced user on this article. I nominated it for deletion on this AfD:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotel Kandahar because I don't think it meets WP:GNG. All references seem to be just mentions or travel guide descriptions.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:26, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Secret Level Inc Flagged for Deletion

Hi. I am uncertain as to why you have flagged the page for deletion. Although it does not yet contain many references, the format follows a similar one to other, comparable companies in the game industry. The company contributed to video games in many ways which is why I am creating it in the first place, and why it belongs here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbretz (talk • contribs) 22:17, 30 January 2015‎

Ok thank you for the follow up and clarification. I will reference any additions I make and be sure to make them not appear promotional.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbretz (talk • contribs) 17:51, 31 January 2015‎

@Cbretz: No problem, thank you for understanding and good luck with your edits. By the way, remember to sign your contributions to talk pages by adding this code at the end: --~~~~ or by clicking in the sign button at the top of the text form. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve Annexin Pharmaceuticals

Hi Crystallizedcarbon,

Thank you for your edit & comment on Annexin Pharmaceuticals!

Since I'm new to editing, could you please help explain how I can add more reliable sources to the article? The sources I have added verify that is it an actual company, the properties of Annexin A5 upon which they have build their company and also cited a published article in BioCentury (author, date etc). I will continue to look for more sources but the ones I've added are reliable.

Regards AGnesSvärd — Preceding unsigned comment added by AgnesSvärd (talk • contribs) 10:51, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello @AgnesSvärd: The main issue with the article is that notability needs to be established for inclusion. Please refer to this guideline: WP:COMPANY. The BioCentury reference does contribute towards establishing the notability requirements, but as you can see in our guidelines it is not enough. The other reference may be valid to meet verifiability requirements, but as routine coverage is not valid towards meeting WP:COMPANY or WP:GNG. To ensure that the article is not deleted you should look for additional independent reliable sources that provide in depth coverage about the company. I hope this clarifies your question, and helps you improve the article. If you have additional questions I will be happy to help.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:27, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Also, please remember to sign your contributions to talk pages by adding this code at the end: --~~~~ or by clicking in the sign button at the top of the text form.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:30, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your Help

Thank you very much for helping me to improve the entry Yaacov Oved. One thing I'm not clear on. You said it requires references. But in the article there's a whole list of books and other references. Aren't they considered to be references? And what is considered to be a good reference? I'm a little confuse... I really appreciate your help! Daryag (talk) 09:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

You are welcome @Daryag: As you can see I added an inline citation to the article. You can use this templates to do the same for all the information that you added: {{Cite web}}, {{Cite news}} and {{Cite book}}. The easy way to use them is to use the cite on the menu at the top of the edit window and then select from the templates list the one that you want to use. Just fill in the parameters you want and they will be formatted for you. It is not so important with the bibliography as it is self sourced in a way (you can improve it latter by using cite book and adding the ISBN codes and links to Google books or similar if they exist). But all the claims in your text should be sourced with references from reliable sources. Follow the blue links to find out more, and if you have any more doubts do not hesitate to ask. Welcome again and enjoy your edits.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your contribution to OR_gate

I've undo your edit to OR_gate in which you added this image instead of this one. Your 4T circuit can however not be implemented in CMOS, as you are using the transistors in an incorrect way. I therefore reverted your edit and reitroduced the original, correct version. Stuner0 (talk) 08:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you @Stuner0: You are correct, the nMOS can't be used to pull up to Vdd or the pMOS to pull down. I was just using digital logic, but for some reason I forgot the analog basics ;) --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:04, 27 February 2015

Deion Turman

Hi. Thanks for the input with Deion Turman's page. I'm not sure what you want for citations other than the ones that I've listed. Deion is actually 6'9 and weighs 235. I've added the Rockets Wiki page that has his height correct but the weight is still off.

Thanks for all of your help.

My best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisa C Raymond (talk • contribs) 00:32, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Lisa C Raymond: There are some issues that need to be addressed in the article. The first, is to establish if it is suitable for inclusion. I don't think Turman meets WP:NHOOPS, so to avoid deletion WP:GNG must be met. Please review our general notability guidelines and find independent reliable sources that talk about Turman in detail and are not WP:ROUTINE coverage (news, magazines, etc...). You can refer to Wikipedia:Citing sources to learn how to properly add them to the article. Also all information in the article needs to be referenced by reliable sources to meet our verifiability guidelines. Another Wikipedia article can't be used as a source for his height, you need to look for non wiki sources. Let me know if there is anything you don't understand. Good luck.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:28, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Bexel Consulting

Crystallizedcarbon, I would really appreciate if you could spend just a bit of your time and give me your opinion about this: I have tried to make a neutral, encyclopedic view about a company that exists for 10 years and has a quality product regarding BIM, while not making any subjective, commercial or advertising statements. I have studied the Wikipedia guidelines as well as looked at several other companies with a similar profile, and tried to look up to these guidelines and articles. Could you perhaps send me your view or some suggestions about how I should change the tone in the article to a neutral, encyclopedic one? I really appreciate your feedback. Thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefan Zoraja (talk • contribs) 22:09, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Stefan Zoraja: Welcome to Wikipedia, please review this two guidelines WP:GNG and WP:CORP. To be encyclopedic, the article must meet the requirements of at least one of them. To be more specific, you need to find independent and in depth coverage of the subject from reliable sources to establish notability. This excludes self published sources or the company web page. Also try to keep statements about the company as neutral as possible. My suggestion is that you first find sources, and then you can use your sandbox to create the article. Once you think it meets our policies I will be happy to review it and give you further advice, or you can ask any experience editor or administrator to do the same. Alternatively you can use our Wikipedia:Articles for creation page. Good luck with your edits.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:50, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 14:54, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Ridiculous Speedy Deletion (BlueBird Cabs Ltd.)

The BlueBird Cabs page was significant because it is the only cab company in Canada that operates on a national level. If that isn't significant, what exactly is considered significant? This wikipedia is for global matters. Just cause some person from Spain like yourself doesn't deem something as being "significant" because you know absolutely nothing about said thing, doesn't take away its value to that specific country. And before deleting an article that had a good amount of information, at least let me know before doing it so fast so that I can save my content. That took hours. Then you come in, and mark it as a "speedy deletion" and it's gone. It astonishes me that Wikipedia has given you the right to deem content as being "significant" or not. That's the last time I'm going to spend any time researching/writing content for this site. Ridiculous.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Megapower goku (talk • contribs) 07:43, 6 March 2015

Hello @Megapower goku: Welcome to Wikipedia, I am sorry that your first article was deleted. Do not get discouraged by it. I understand your concern, but I do not decide what is or is not notable, I simply followed our objective guidelines to nominate the article which was deleted by an administrator. Please review this two guidelines General Notability Guideline and Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). To be encyclopedic, the article must meet the requirements of at least one of them. To be more specific, you need to find independent and in depth coverage of the subject from reliable sources to establish notability. This excludes self published sources routine coverage passing mentions or the company web page. I tried to find such coverage to add it to the article before nominating, but all I could find at that time were passing mentions like this article. You just need to find at least one more article like this recently published article I just found. With at least two such articles notability would be established. If you do, you can request the article to be recreated and use this guide:Wikipedia:Citing sources to add the sources needed to meet our notability and verifiability requirements yourself. If you have any trouble adding them I would be happy to give you a hand. For future articles I suggest you read this guide: Wikipedia:Your first article. I think it will help you. I hope that you do not get discouraged and decide to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

The reference I mentioned before: Indonesia's Blue Bird Targets New Growth: Noni Purnomo seems to be for an Indonesian cab company (Blue Bird TBK), so it would not help establish notability for your article. You would need to find 2 similar articles for Blue Bird Ltd. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Spanish language

Hi, be so kind and check the version you have just saved. It still contains at lease one instance of vandalism (look out for the gnome). I am pretty sure, my revert was correct. Best regards Unoffensive text or character (talk) 11:03, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Ok, this seems to be right now. Unoffensive text or character (talk) 11:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Unoffensive text or character: Yes, I also noticed it, thank you for your help.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:08, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Shrraddha Pandit

Change the dob for miss pandit... It's wrong... Or remove it... The official website is going to be put up soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loozu (talk • contribs) 07:19, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

@Loozu: You should not change information in articles like the name, surname and date of birth without providing reliable sources. Also please don't remove tags from articles. About the date of birth listed in the article, since it was unsourced I have removed it. Doing just that would have been a legitimate edit, since all information included in biographies of living people must be sourced. Please review the information I have added in the welcome message in your talk page. If you follow those guidelines you can change disruptive edits into productive ones.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced page?

Hi Crystallizedcarbon. I'm a little puzzled as to the purpose of Wikipedia:Vandalismo en curso, a page you created. It appears to be a malformed copy of AIV on the Spanish Wikipedia, but then why is it on the English Wikipedia? Or maybe Huggle just messed up? Cheers, Altamel (talk) 04:38, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Altamel: Thank you for the heads up, I have requested its deletion. You guessed correctly it's a Huggle bug. When I use it in both projects simultaneously and report a Spanish project vandal it does that. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 06:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

BACN Section Deletion Revert

Crysallizedcarbon - The BACN section you reverted was deleted in direct response to concerns related to the page (i.e., not factual and sales-pitchy). The section was an individual's perspective on "Problems Emerge" that bears no relation to the actual content of the page and reflects a unique perspective vs a factual reference. This section should be removed in its entirety. Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.18.169.190 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 5 April 2015

Hello@65.18.169.190: I recommend that you discuss your views on the talk page of the article to try to reach a consensus before deleting the section, or at least explain your edits there. Please read this recommendations BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. My reason for reverting you with this edit, was that you left this message in the article page itself: "This section reflected a personal opinion of the impact of the QDR and related historical events that bear no factual relevance to the article subject". Those comments belong on the talk page of the article or on the edit summary, but never on the article itself. I have left a welcome message in your talk page. I recommend you follow the links to get more familiar with Wikipedia and make your editions more productive. Enjoy your stay.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 06:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Cecily Strong revision

Why don't you think the information you reverted is relevant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.143.117 (talk) 13:39, 9 April 2015 (UTC) 66.87.143.117 (talk) 13:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

This edit was reverted because adding irrelevant and unsourced obscenities to a BLP is considered Vandalism. Please make sure that your future edits are more constructive.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

I can't argue with that. You win. 66.87.143.117 (talk) 17:55, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for understanding.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

About edits to Savant syndrome

Hey, Iam really sorry for deleting the page... It was by mistake. Thank you for recovering it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamanna1510 (talk • contribs) 14:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Tamanna1510: Understood, it is no problem, BTW, don't forget to sign your posts in talk pages by adding this code: --~~~~ at the end of your comments. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 14:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Its not vandalism or a joke

the press release is coming at the end of the week please contact Pornhub's marketing department if you have any questions.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.114.197.189 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 13 April 2015

Yes it is, and if you continue your disruptive editing you may be blocked from Wikipedia.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:44, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

hi about the king ling college info update

Hi Crystallisedcarbon,

For ur mention in the pages' script, some info. not be updated, therefore i wanna update it as a role of teacher of King Ling college, there are include the history of KL college and the percentage of academic qualification of the teacher group . But i have log in with wiki account later for any constructive amendment, thx for ur remind^^ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.188.214.147 (talk • contribs) 09:36, 14 April 2015‎

I understand, please make sure to use sources when you change information, like the school theme. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Panzi

Panzi is not gay,it is a lie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.107.22.235 (talk) 19:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Current sources in the article indicate otherwise. If you have sources to prove it, add them to the article, or discuss it in talk before changing the article.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 22:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

SORRY

I am sorry please remove both my edits as I am unable to do so. Thanking you 182.69.165.65 (talk) 10:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Remove the plot for V for Vendetta

I would like to ask if you can remove the plot of V For Vendetta the movie because my friend went on the page real quick to look at some of the actors in it and caught a glimpse of the storyline and the ending was spoiled for him now he doesn't want to watch it so I was just trying to put in a simple sentence of what the storyline is without spoilers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.194.243.168 (talk) 12:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

If you wish to make mayor changes to the article V for Vendetta (film) like changing the existing plot section for a single sentence, please discuss them first on the article's talk page.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 12:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Can you please explain?

Would you please explain why making a spelling correction (no matter how minor) is not a "constructive" edit? Btw, I noticed a statement something like "related to a business interest [of mine]" -- again, I don't see how improving an article's spelling could have anything to do with a business interest. The article (Renae Lawrence) is completely unrelated to any business interest with which I might even be tangentially associated. 148.177.1.211 (talk) 13:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Please accept my apologies, I did not know that naïve was the correct spelling for naive. I have reversed the edit and removed the notice from your talk page. Please note that the comments relating to your edits having a business interest were made by a different user. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

"I will say, that a man must be a d—d fool, who can’t spell a word more than one way." Variations of this quotation have existed in English for nearly 200 years...mainly because (1) English spelling makes no sense, and (2) many English speakers can't spell correctly anyway. I figured that you would enjoy English making a virtue out of a defect ;-). See http://quoteinvestigator.com/2010/06/25/spelling/

William J. 'Bill' McCalpin (talk) 02:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you @Mccalpin: I did enjoy reading it .--Crystallized C (talk) 08:07, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

changes

wasn't me, I am sorry my friend got on. I apologize for his inappropriate behavior.Roar7172 (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Roar7172: I understand, no problem.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

I need some help on the Spanish...

I don't know if you have taken the Los Angeles Metro, but there are some Spanish announcements that come along. I have a hard time trying to put this as letters, and am I able to ask you to listen to an audio file, then put it as words? Gracias.
ＨａｎＳａｎｇＹｏｏｎＵＳＡ [ Discussion ] [ History ] 18:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello @HanSangYoon: You can send it to me, and I will do my best to help. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:05, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Kordsa Global

Hey, how can I improve the Kordsa Global page to make it stay on Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cansungur (talk • contribs) 13:56, 16 May 2015‎

Hello @Cansungur: As I added in the talk page, if there is media coverage from independent and reliable sources please use them to add references to the article and establish notability. Adding references to only the corporate webpage does not meet our notability guidelines.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:04, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I will try to crate a better page again. I'm thinking of this a s a challenge for me to improve my wiki skills! :) Cansungur (talk) 16:32, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

@Cansungur: If you can find the needed sources to establish notability, I suggest that you use your sandbox, that way you can work on improving the article at your own pace. This guide may also be of help: Wikipedia:Your first article. If you need help along the process you can let me know. Good luck.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:44, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

My page should not be speedy deleted because...

My page, Carlos Salazar (Painter) should not be speedily deleted. Maybe because of, in my 1st posting inexperience, I put too much information about me, and, to top it off, in Spanish; but then I deleted it and translated the information into English. Now, the fact that you consider my article is irrelevant from a encyclopedic pow, is maybe just because you personally dont' t know my name in Colombian Art History. But alas... Wikipedia itself, do recognize my place there. I am a 1st Prize in the Salon of Colombian Artists in 1985, as Wikipedia shows it in the article dedicated to it. Please take a brief look at it at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salon_of_Colombian_Artists.You are going to find me there listed in the year 1985. So I would be glad and very thankful if you allow me continuing to build a personal entry in Wikipedia having understood your strict policy about data. Every data I'll post, you can double-chek it in academic works about Colombian Art History and in several other places in the web.

Thanks for your consideration and, time.

Carlos Salazar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salazar86~eswiki (talk • contribs) 21:54, 18 May 2015

@Salazar86~eswiki: Hello Carlos, let me congratulate you for your achievements and wish you the best of lucks in your career as an artist. Please understand that the article was deleted not because of what any editor thinks. The criteria has nothing to do with your actual achievements as an artist. It was deleted on the basis of what you wrote about yourself (your education and one phrase about "Gynotopies") did not meet our minimum requirements for inclusion and that a quick search in Google did not reveal any coverage. If your works were exhibited in mayor events, it should have been mentioned it in the article as long as it could be sourced from a reference from a reliable and independent source to meet our verifiability requirements (Wikipedia itself would not count as a reference). Another important issue is that writing an autobiography is strongly discouraged in Wikipedia. Please follow the blue links to find out more, and also please review this: Wikipedia:Notability (people) our General notability guideline and Wikipedia:Your first article. Regards and good luck. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:29, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Hi, why you tag my article for speedy deletion ??--Nishoo singh (talk) 07:40, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Nishoo singh: You blanked the page PRIME DATABASE GROUP that you created and had copyright issues. when an editor deletes all the contents of a page he/she creates it is assumed that the intention is to delete the article. That is the reason why I nominated it under criteria G7 for speedy deletion, and why it was deleted by an administrator. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Rocc (opera stage director & designer)

Hi Crystallizedcarbon,

thank you very much for your comment. I am going to add the references in the following days. We are going to update his official website which could be the best reference.

Is it OK?

Many thanks and kind regards,

Tomas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomas Cafourek (talk • contribs) 15:43, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Tomas Cafourek: Please read this guide: Help:Introduction to referencing/1 and our guidelines on Reliable sources. Also, since you seem to be involved with the subject of the BLP please read this as well: WP:COI. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 13:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

hacked

Someone has hacked into my account. Probably some jr. High kid. I don't even remember my username and password. Sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:8:8:0:0:0:5A (talk) 22:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Ok, no problem, the edits were made from the same IP (Same computer or same computer network), If it is a shared machine or network, you can create an account to avoid this problem.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

hrbuniversal

Am I not allowed to make an article about a company period or is it the way I have written it that is the problem? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.201.77.22 (talk) 18:57, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

The problem is with the article in its current form. Please review this guideline about neutral point of view in articles: WP:BROCHURE also please review WP:CORP and WP:GNG about the required notability. I also recomend you review this guide Wikipedia:Your first article for this or other articles. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you.

Thank you for understanding, and thank you so much for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KKbeast (talk • contribs) 19:38, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

You are welcome, I am sorry that your new article got deleted, but I can see that you could still contribute. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 21:19, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Empire edits

I apologize for the incovenience my son uses my PC all the time and he must have done it i will be sure he doesn't do it again

Sincerely, John Donovann — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.41.69.78 (talk) 18:32, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

I undertand. No problem. It is solved and no harm is done. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 21:18, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Past operation where I suspected paid editing has been confirmed

Remember the time when I suspected paid editing and thus opened an AfD instead of tagging for speedy? It has been confirmed to indeed be paid editing, and there are way more socks involved. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nopirosyadi. Gparyani (talk) 17:55, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations @Gparyani: You were right! I agree with you. It is better removing the source of the problem than having to delete the promotional articles over and over.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:31, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Article deletion

Thanks for your mail. I know I have been neutral on this article but if you feel like there is need for deletion please go ahead. Thanks once again. Manny — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manny2015 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for giving me the opportunity to create a page on Jalal-Eddeen Abubakar Saleh, notwithstanding the fact that you have deleted the page. I would like to request that the page be restored as there is no conflict of interest associated with the creation of that page. The references that I cited are not biased in any way. I can assure you that I will cite additional references for the page in the course of time. In view of that I humbly request you to restore the page to uphold the mission and vision in which Wikipedia is created and for the sake of freedom of association and expression. Thanks once again for giving us the opportunity to express ourselves. Long Live Wikepedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manny2015 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Manny2015: The article was deleted by administrator Jenks24 as it was interpreted that you wanted to delete it in good faith. If that was not the case and you can indeed find at least two independent references from reliable sources that treat the subject in depth to establish notability, you can get in touch with the administrator and request that the article be restored. I recommend that you follow the links to find out more about Wikipedia's definition of reliable sources and also to review this two guides to see if the subject of your article meets our notability guidelines: WP:GNG and WP:SCHOLAR.Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 22:45, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Maine state legislature page

The graphic for the Maine state Senate doesn't match the legend . The red and blue are swapped. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.190.84.217 (talk) 03:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

 Done Thank you for finding it.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:04, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Megatokyo

Why'd you revert my edits from Megatokyo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.81.228.67 (talk) 19:37, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Because with this edit you removed referenced content and inserted what seems to be lyrics copied and pasted from another site.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm not edited something of School of Rock

Sorry for my bad english xD

but I need to talk about a message that you sent me, and I must say that I have not published anything about the article "School of Rock" and there has been some confusion. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.132.109.100 (talk) 22:43, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Here you can see the edits done from your IP: Special:Contributions/206.132.109.100. If you did not do this edits then someone using your computer or another computer in your network did. If that is the case, you can avoid this problem by registering an account. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:01, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Edit on Antiques Roadshow

Hello

I believe that the Paragraph on Jimmy Saville was Vague and did not give a accurate date.

I believe your revert was in error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.33.163.72 (talk) 09:03, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I reverted this edit made by you because you changed the paragraph for a single "d" character. It seems clear now that it was just a mistake or typo so I have removed the warning message from your talk page. I have no objection to your removal of the unsourced information in the article. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:12, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, Yes I didnt see the d. All good — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.33.163.72 (talk) 09:17, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

No problem, please remember to sign your posts on talk pages using this code --~~~~ at the end of your messages.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:19, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Olive Dutton Green

Hello & thanks for your message.

Olive is not a living person. She was an interesting artist who died in 1930. I have added three links to my entry from Australian archive web pages. Hope this does the trick!

I hope to embellish the entry later when I become more confident with the Wiki pages.

All the best

Rob — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charliedench (talk • contribs) 11:26, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Charliedench: I noticed it after you added the references, I removed the prod. I will also improve the references in the article. Please refer to this guide Wikipedia:Citing sources. And remember to sign your comments on talk pages. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:32, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Saqlain Mushtaq

Hi,You just removed my edition to the article Saqlain Mushtaq.So thank you,if you think I was wrong.But I read that information on the same page (i.e in RECORDS AND ACHIEVEMENTS section),and I didn't think it was wrong .So I just moved it up............... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.154.205.133 (talk) 03:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

You must be refering to this edit in which I reversed edits by 182.188.202.94 in the article Saqlain Mushtaq. In this version before my changes you can see how those edits did affect the article in a negative way (look at both, the top and the bottom of the page). I suggest that you try to experiment with the code you tried to insert in your sandbox first before adding it to articles (upper right menu). Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 06:46, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Deletion page

My name is Valery De Smedt and by Flanders Arts Institute I have been asked to create a page on CREW_Eric Joris, one of the important performance collective of Belgium. See: www.crewonline.org CREW Eric Joris (talk) 10:04, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello @CREW Eric Joris: Please review this guide: Wikipedia:Your_first_article. Also please notice that your username is considered promotional, and it's against our policies as you can see here: WP:GROUPNAME. Also please review our policy on conflicts of interest. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:15, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

@CREW Eric Joris: Please do not re-create the page for the third time until you have addressed the issues mentioned above as it will most likely be deleted again.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:30, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Lowry Solutions

Hello Crystallized Carbon,

I want to work in keeping this page up. It has partnerships with other Wiki identities such as Honeywell and Zebra. It is also strong with city of Brighton, MI and I am assisting in promoting local business.

If there is any way I could work in keeping this page up, I would love to hear any suggestion.

Thank you for your time.

Castsaber — Preceding unsigned comment added by Castsaber81 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Castsaber81: I have removed the speedy deletion tag, since you added a claim of notability to Lowry Solutions with a reference. You need to improve it by adding reliable sources to the article to meet our policies for inclusion, in this case, please review our general notability guidelines and our corporation notability guidelines. Also please use the preview button before saving your changes while you are learning how to edit to avoid unintended changes to the page as you did here and here. Regards and good luck with your edits.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

about that "Ugur" page speed deletion

Hello; This title is the translation of the content on the Turkish Wikipedia. I can develop for the portion that you find unsatisfactory and i´ll add news and references published in the shortest time. Can we stop the deletion? PAGE LINK --Badursun (talk) 11:01, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Badursun: It's done. Since the Turkish version does have references that may be valid WP:RS to fulfill our notability requirements the article does not meet the requirements for speedy deletion. Please be sure to improve the article so it can meet the following policies WP:CORP or WP:GNG and WP:NPOV to ensure it's not deleted. Thank you for your contributions. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:34, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Please stop edit warring and pushing own table without consensus. Your opinion does not make sense - see Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle: bold edit, revert -> discuss. This method works for such situations, one user (in this case - you) enter new changes, other user treats change as bad and revert it, in this situation must to be discuss and consensus before changes. It is logical. Until reach consensus, there is version before new changes - status quo (see Wikipedia:STATUSQUO). You are a beginner, on Wikipedia from 11 months and certain things you can not understand, your behavior qualifies as edit warring. If you have a problems with understanding of Wikipedia:CYCLE, please ask the administrators. However, next your restoration own table without consensus will be treating as vandalism and automatically reverted and also you will be reported to the administrator (reason: edit warring for push own changes without consensus). If you want a table - ok, please discuss, and wait for consensus. I had to write on your talk page because this is official warning. Rest discuss is here. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 17:31, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Subtropical-man: Once again I think you are mistaken.

Please be sure to check your facts. I recommend that you assume good faith before you accuse another editor!

As you can see the table was added in this edit by AlburzadorLommaren on 2 March 2015. Not me. Since then the article has been reviewed and edited by many users. That is the Wikipedia:STATUSQUO in this case. Recently just before your deletion of the whole table, HardstyleGB (Not me) added two more rows to the table along with an explanation in the edit summary (see here and here). You did not just revert those changes, you removed the whole table erasing also the source information added by other editors months ago. That is a bold edit. I did not make any change to the table other than reverting your bold edit.

Your threat "next your restoration own table without consensus will be treating as vandalism and automatically reverted and also you will be reported to the administrator" its uncalled for and against our policies, as I never edited that table. All I did was revert your own edit following Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle recommendations which you mistakenly broke.

I assume that you just made a mistake, so if you revert Spain to the Wikipedia:STATUSQUO (that can be before or after HardstyleGB recent changes) I will be happy to continue the discussion with you and other interested editors on the talk page and I will treat your comments above just as a mistake. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

User who add table is User:Lommaren [1], not User:Alburzador. User Lommaren also add table to article of Morrocco. Returning to the case: it does not matter whether it's you or Lommaren added table. Consequently, I not reverted your change but change by user Lommaren, does not matter who is author of table. The table is too large to main article of country and has too selective data of two or four months all the more do not make sense. If "bold" changes is controversial - I have the right to undo the changes. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 19:16, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

My mistake the edit was indeed made by Lommaren instead of Alburzador and also edited by HardstyleGB.

I would also appreciate it if you could admit your mistake in accusing me of reverting you to restore what you referred to as "my table" when it is clear that I did not create or edited the table and that I am trying to protect the sourced contributions of other editors that I think were reasonable before a consensus can be reached.

You of course do have the right to make bold changes, but if they get reverted, you should discuss and find consensus instead of engaging in edit warring. If you choose not to restore the article to its STATUSQUO and postpone your proposed changes until consensus is reached in line with WP:CYCLE I should seek mediation from WP:AN/3 so an administrator can clarify what should be the right approach in this case.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:53, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

My mistake, not you but user Lommaren add table. Better? :) Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 19:56, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, we all make mistakes, no problem.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:03, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

I do not understand your text: "You of course do have the right to make bold changes, but if they get reverted, you should discuss and find consensus instead of engaging in edit warring". Or you understood own mistake or you mistake of two things. I do not do "bold" edit, I revert "bold" edit by user:Lommaren. As for WP:AN/3, WP:AN/3 works to edit wars (4 or more reverts, 3RR). Back to the topic: a large table in the article is a controversial change, before change must to be discuss and consensus, so. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 20:06, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

I can understand your motivations, and it is clear that you are just trying to improve the article, we share the same objective, the only discrepancy is on the process to reach that objective. Let me explain to you my interpretation WP:CYCLE to be able to answer your question.

Removing sourced information added to the article months ago and in which more than one editor have contributed is not a revert. It is a bold edit, which is perfectly ok to do. It is actually encouraged, specially since you explained your reasons and they seem reasonable (even though I do not share some of those arguments). Up to this point everything is ok. Per WP:CYCLE however, if your changes are challenged and your edit is reverted, you should discuss, instead of reverting back, or accusing the person that requested a dialog on the talk page and reverted you to restore the sourced content.

As far as I am concerned this issue is settled. I understand that your accusations were simply a mistake I really appreciate your answer above and your civil tone and I do agree with you that you have not violated WP:3RR. I hope we can work together from now on. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:41, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

If that's OK with you, we can continue our discussion about the table on the talk page of Spain.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:44, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Craig Parisot

Yeah, I've changed my mind. He's not important enough, you're right. Please delete the page. ty -- Oghitta420 (talk) 18:39, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

 Done by an administrator.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 21:26, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Nithin

Thank you for your assistance in maintaining verifiability and editorial integrity with the Nithin article. In addition to the BLP/N, I have shared my concerns regarding this article at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard should you wish to comment. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 18:48, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

I am really glad I could be of help.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 21:25, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Yamaguchi先生: I hope the contributions from that editor become more constructive after the block expires. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:43, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

advise

Dear,

how do I start this wikipage on Belgian Performance Collective? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valery De Smedt (talk • contribs) 15:35, 22 July 2015‎

The first step is for you to see if the group meets our notability requirements for inclusion. Please review WP:BAND and WP:GNG. At least one must be met. If you can meet the criteria by finding independent reliable sources that treat the subject extensively (not routine coverage) then please make sure to use a neutral language and include only information covered by the references. Once the draft is ready if you want I can review it and give you some feedback. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:33, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Reaching out for Proposed deletion of Hucchavenka

Hi Crystallizedcarbon

I have added bibliography references. I'll add more details about the actor in near future. We are retrieving more information about the actor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhilashrao (talk • contribs) 19:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Abhilashrao: Since you added a reference I removed the proposed deletion of the article. But it still needs a lot of work. Please read this guide Help:Introduction to referencing/1. All information in the article must be referenced by a reliable source.This is specially important on biographies of living people. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:05, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello

i need help that page name, is typed wrongly How to correct it help me out — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishal012322 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello again @Abhilashrao: What is the correct name?

By the way, don't forget to sign your posts on talk pages using the signature icon or typing ~~~~ at the end of your comments.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Mwandi Wikipedia page

I have just edited openstreetmap.org to include Mwandi, my reference is the map coordinates and I know people that live there

Cheers

Bob — Preceding unsigned comment added by Centralamerica (talk • contribs) 08:08, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

@Centralamerica: Hello Bob, please review this tutorial Help:Introduction to referencing/1. Please pay special atention to this section that explains what qualifies as a reliable source. As you can see I moved the link to the hospital to the external links section. If you do find a good source and you still have trouble to add it to the article, you can let me know and I will be happy to help. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 12:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments on Jalal-Eddeen Abubakar Saleh

Hi, I refer to the article on Jalal-Eddeen Abubakar Saleh. My attention was drawn to the fact that I refer to him as a Professor of Public Health but no mention of a University was made. Kindly refer to the links shown below to agree with me that he is a Professor of Public Health: 1. Google citation site is only activated if there is a functional university email address to verify as shown on this link: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=cl-OUyYAAAAJ&hl=en

2. Scholarly articles could be found on this link: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jalal-Eddeen_Saleh

Additionally, what actually qualifies a scholar to be a Professor in his discipline is to have the following: - PhD - At least 10 published scholarly articles I hope I have cleared the air and the deletion would be reviewed for the article to be uploaded for users to access. Thanks once again. Manny. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manny2015 (talk • contribs) 13:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Manny2015: As you can see here the article was deleted by an administrator after you blanked the page, following this criteria. I hope that helps. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 12:16, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Deleted page

How are we going to add references if you keep deleting them...and There is a grace period. Banlieue130 (talk) 13:26, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

I did not delete the page, I nominated Ben Kaba (Urban Astronaut) for deletion once. It was deleted twice by two different administrators because it met these criteria:

• (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: unsourced biography of a living person, no evidence of notability)
• (A7: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events))

--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

speedy deleting nomination

Hi Crystallizedcarbon,

I was going to fill the page at a later point, as my intention was solely to reserve the space for later. I do not mind, if it is being deleted now. I will then probably start it later again, with a larger amount of content, once I have the time to do so. Nederlanderthaler (talk) 17:46, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Nederlanderthaler: Welcome, even if the article gets deleted, do not get discouraged. I suggest you review this guide: Wikipedia:Your first article. I also suggest that you use your sandbox you can access it by clicking "sandbox" on the top right menu. The sandbox is a sub-page in which you can work and experiment on your draft until you think the article is ready to be posted in the main space. If you decide to use it, you can let me know when you think the article meets our guidelines and I will be happy to review it for you before moving it to main space and point out any possible areas of improvement. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

S.R. Chishti and S R Chishti

Hello, the page exists with the two name S.R. Chishti and S R Chishti, delete one of them because it is about the same person.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohd Sarim Ashrafi (talk • contribs) 10:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Mohd Sarim Ashrafi:: It is done, sorry for the mistake. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Plz publish either of them S. R. Chishti or S R Chishti, now one is deletion and another is blank... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohd Sarim Ashrafi (talk • contribs) 10:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

@Mohd Sarim Ashrafi: I see you took care of it. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 12:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Ultimate Titains

is fine for me to create my own wikipedia page like Ultimate Titains. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acodomy (talk • contribs) 18:01, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Acodomy: Welcome to Wikipedia. Any user can create and edit pages as long as it is done following our policies and guidelines. Please review This guide about writing your first article I think it will help you make your future contributions more productive. Enjoy your stay. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Hulk Hogan's Title Reigns

Hello Crystallizedcarbon,

Since Hulk Hogan is no long recognized as being a part of the WWE at any point in his career, should the List of WWE World Heavyweight Champions be edited to show that?

--TheHelixYT (talk) 01:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello @TheHelixYT: It is a good point. Personally I would add a note to all the table entries explaining that the titles have been removed from the hall of fame by WWE and that it was due to offensive racial statements adding a reference to source it. I would use the templates {{efn}} and {{notelist}}. I would not just delete the information, as it is sourced. If you need help using the templates, I can do the edits myself. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello again @TheHelixYT: I also found an article from a reliable source that said that WWE was erasing the all mentions of Hulk Hogan, but I just visited the oficial page and his titles are still listed, so we should probably wait and see if they are removed before making the edits. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I will check daily to see if his title reigns are dropped by WWE or not, and we can, if the title reigns are dropped, keep Hogan's reigns in the list, but gray them out and add the comment saying "WWE does not recognize Hulk Hogan's championship reigns due to complications with Hogan's racist remarks." --TheHelixYT (talk) 22:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Scott Howie

Please revert the changes. I approve them as factually correct.

Regards, Scott Howie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.188.163 (talk) 19:03, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

I seriously doubt it. Your edit is considered vandalism and if repeated it could cause your account to be blocked. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:12, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Ratsmah

Ratsmah is in fact one of the more notable Hearthstone players - the guy averages about 1K to 2K viewers on average. So much so, that his chat literally consists of mostly people repeating themselves and spamming a random copypasta at times. Sometimes it goes an entire page of messages almost at once. The stream is comparable in recognition to Kripp or Trump, the man is quite famous. I would agree, however, that if it is to be kept, it should be expanded from a stub. DN-boards1 (talk) 20:58, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello @DN-boards1: The number of viewers is not enough to establish notability. If you can find at least two independent and reliable sources that treat the subject in depth to meet our general notability guidelines you could recreate the article. If you can find the sources and decide to write it again, I would suggest that you do it in your sandbox first or use the article wizard to make sure it is reviewed before moving it to the main space. I think that way your work will be more productive. If you need my help with the process please be sure to let me know. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Better Calculated Decisions Software

Hello, please do not delete the article for Better Calculated Decisions Software. It is about a new company that uses a new technology to predict human behavior patterns (i.e. big data but on a small scale) it uses Predictive behavior methodology to understand the behavior of workers and then it suggests a better schedule for them so they become more efficient. Browardauthor (talk) 19:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Browardauthor: You need to establish its notability. As 331dot mentioned in the article's talk page, article subjects must be shown with independent reliable sources that they are notable in some way, either by meeting our general notability guidelines or our notability guidelines for companies. If you can find at least two, you can let me know and I will remove the tag. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Serafix

Hi, the reason the Serafix article is unsourced properly is because I couldn't find any legit sources except one farm website, run by people who were breeding from Serafix's line and had copied an article about him from an old, old issue of an Arabian horse magazine. I will try to find out some more about him later and add it (like height!). White Arabian mare (talk) 21:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello @White Arabian mare: Thank you, good luck with the article. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 22:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

I'm watching the article, Crystallizedcarbon and will mentor on it - White Arabian mare is a new user and any help in assisting her in learning to edit is, I am sure, welcomed; she's been very good about learning how stuff works here and has a great attitude! Montanabw^(talk) 18:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Montanabw: Thank you for that, I leave it in your hands. For the article's verifiability, it would be great if the only reference can be formatted correctly and linked to the published copy of the source. To meet WP:GNG it would also help if at least another reliable source can be found. Best regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

I posted about five refs at the talk page for WAM to look at, if she has trouble creating citations and footnotes, we can probably both lend a hand! The horse is definitely notable within the Arabian breed. Montanabw^(talk) 21:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Great job @Montanabw: I agree on notability, if you want, I will be happy to help her do it. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 21:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Thomas Woodruff (artist)

Hello, thank you for your message. I completely understand your concern, and want to be clear that I have the artist's consent to source from his website. Having said that, I am happy to rewrite the text to comply with Wikipedia copyright policy. Please allow me some time today to edit Thomas Woodruff (artist) to that I may correct my submission.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cedwards258 (talk • contribs) 13:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Cedwards258: By the time I read your message an administrator already deleted it. Besides the copyright issue, if you want to recreate the article, you have to make sure that it also meets our notability requirements. You should first find at least two independent and reliable sources that treat the subject in depth to meet our general notability guidelines. If you can find them, I suggest you create it in your sandbox first or use the article wizard to make sure it meets our policies before moving it to the main space. That way you can work on it at your own pace without it being deleted. If you need help with the process you can let me know. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Contest Deletion of JaBonn Bond

Good day sir, i will try to keep this short. i was just writing about a young man who is very important in his community and just wanted to share this with people. However, if this will be a problem, then i can go ahead and remove it. but is there any other suggestion's that you might be able to help me to share this?? Thanks so much. Perry Steven's — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chefboy1 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Chefboy1: Welcome to Wikipedia. Let me suggest that you briefly review our notability requirements before creating your articles. You should first find at least two independent and reliable sources that treat the proposed subject in depth to meet our general notability guidelines. If you can find them, I suggest you create it in your sandbox first or use the article wizard to make sure it meets our policies before moving it to the main space. That way you can work on it at your own pace. Let me know if you need help along the way. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 14:48, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

please detail what is it that you want to revert about DAB comment

would it be ok to send you comments/changes by email to jgb2012@sky.com, please. Now, detail in capital font what is it that you want to or have already changed:

The only market sector where DAB seems to have achieved certain broad interest in terms of sales volumes is automotive.

FM suffers 'carrier overlap' when similar power levels on antenna, meaning while listening a station, you may suddenly listen for short intervals, other nearby stations.

FM and AM more, may suffer signal dynamic range compression when driving through 'busy spectrum' locations, when the noise ground is lifted by strong interference and background noise, the end signal on speakers suffers some quality reduction, or even leaking noise into the signal, noise and/or interference amplified along the useful signal, which pushes listeners to switch station, losing audience.

DAB solves these analogue reception points digitizing and processing tributaries through coding blocks, that, within certain values, when above certain mean power on antenna, it succeeds at making reception independent of noise interference, preventing quality time gaps.

But the FM transmitter-receiver chain is far more simple and cheaper than the group of chips and coding because, the IT crowd writing code is increasingly the utmost expensive bit in digital communications design budgets. So when buying a car, adding DAB may make sense.

But it is not immediate to understand how adding video through DAB+ will really catch the eye of an important percentage of DAB listeners, vehicle drivers, without reducing attention to road, safety first.

And with DVB-T2 et al already offering radio channels, mobile 3G 4G and LTE streaming lorries of data from websites offering radio channels, as well as L-band DAB usage blocked by military to prevent spectrum problems, and Canada, back in 90s the country that saw DAB technology born having decided to stop using DAB (map next to this page header), the rest of DAB advantages over other digital broadcasting technologies seem accessories that so far do not really make customers buy DAB terminals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.5.163.160 (talk • contribs) 14:40, 1 September 2015

Hello, please accept my apologies, as the notice and the revert of your edit was done by mistake. I have removed the notice from your talk page, as it is clear that the edit was done in good faith. I have restored your edit, but please review it. The content you added needs to be sourced with references form reliable sources, if not it may considered original research. Also there are some formatting errors (point 3 is repeated and if you want to make a numbered list, you can use the # character at the beginning of each line). You can also use the show preview button to see the result before saving. Once you find the references to source the information, if you have difficulties adding them to the article, I will be happy to give you a hand. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Wrong information

Flacco didn't win 13 games in his rookie season... They were 11-5... The most wins in a regular season by a rookie belongs to Ben Roethlisberger with 13... Could this be changed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.170.34.110 (talk) 16:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the heads up, It is taken care of.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

I am sorry.

Hi I'm Ethan and I am sorry for what I did may I please be apart of your wonderfull wiki team as I am online 24/7 365.

Thanks Ethan. Ethannethan (talk) 11:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

No problem @Ethannethan: If you want to contribute constructively to Wikipedia you are more than welcome here. I left a welcome message on your talk page, in it you can learn about our guidelines. Bellow that section you can find links with tasks that you can do right away to improve Wikipedia. Again, welcome and enjoy your edits. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 14:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: Thank you

Re your message: No problem, but I'm sure that he will be back. I just caught a third account trying working towards autoconfirmed status. I have this feeling that the article is going to eventually have to have full protection in order to stop the sockpuppetry. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Re NMW controversy and my edit of Ruby McGregor-Smith

Thank you Crystallizedcarbon for your input and thoughts on my edit of Ruby McGregor-Smith's wiki page.

I have to say alas as a newbie to Wiki I am somewhat confused as to why I cannot edit and include the controversy of McGregor's company MiHomecare 'flouting minimum wage' on her page. When you mention things such as because Ruby is a 'living' person - that does not alter the allegations and is something I believe indeed should still be allowed on her Wiki page. I believe it is a very important issue. And McGregor's page as it stands without it - gives a less truthful and rounded account of Ms McGregor's business dealings.

Also as an example: Greville Janner,Baron Janner of Braunstone is still living and it seems it is perfectly okay for someone to edit and include on his page child sexual abuse allegations. Therefore, as I said I am at a loss as to why you and Arthur say I cannot include the minimum wage issue scandal on McGregor-Smith's page.

As for reliable sources I included the BBC,The Mail and CorporateWatch. I could have included the Independent or local newspaper reports, but I thought the media sources I had used were indeed respectable and reliable sources.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/mihomecare-one-of-uks-biggest-care-agencies-being-sued-for-paying-below-minimum-wage-10450780.html

I am still of the opinion that the controversy of breaking NMW law should be on Ruby McGregor's Wiki page, especially as child abuse allegations have been allowed on Janner's page.

Thanks in advance for your thoughts on my continued stance that the issues I have raised should be allowed to stand and should be included on Ruby McGregor-Smith's page.

BebbyReb

BebbyReb (talk) 19:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello @BebbyReb: The best place to discuss this issue is the talk page of the article, that way the discussion can be followed by other editors as well.

I will answer this question here but I ask you to please continue any further discussion at Talk:Ruby McGregor-Smith#Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:UNDUE - National Minimum Wage.

On top of the reasons given by Arthur goes shopping, the source you cite above does not even mention Ruby McGregor-Smith so assuming that she is directly involved on the alleged wrongdoing by her company and that "she broke the law", as you wrote, can be considered to be original research as it is not mentioned directly by the secondary source. That is against our policies. Even if the source mentioned her directly as allegedly breaking the law and if the issue was serious enough to be considered a crime (probably not) our WP:BLPCRIME policy would instruct to seriously consider including accusations that people committed a crime before a conviction is secured.

As I suggested on the talk page of the BLP, the best place for adding the sourced information would probably be to include it on a page about Mihomecare, but since that page does not exist as it is probably not notable enough, it might be warranted to include it in the Mitie company page pending future developments. I still think it does not belong on the BLP's article. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 21:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Switch his name back

That Qwertyuiop105 (talk) 20:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

@Qwertyuiop105: I will not due that, as this edit made by you is offensive and considered vandalism. If repeated your account may be blocked. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 14:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

How to add our company details

Hello Team,

I would like to add about our company details, not able to submit now and kindly share the guidelines to get approved.

Regards, Gruha Kalyan Team — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gruhakalyan (talk • contribs) 07:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Gruhakalyan: Welcome to Wikipedia, please review this two guidelines WP:GNG and WP:CORP. To be encyclopedic, an article about a company must meet the requirements of at least one of them. To be more specific, you need to find independent and in depth coverage of the subject from reliable sources to establish notability. This excludes self published sources or the company web page. It must be written in a neutral way. If you think that it can meet our policies and since you are directly involved with the company I suggest that you submit your request here: Wikipedia:Requested articles. Alternatively you may use our Wikipedia:Articles for creation page and the content will be reviewed first. Good luck with your edits.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 14:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Jamesmcardle. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Big Brother Africa 10, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. sinarau (talk) 12:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Jamesmcardle: No problem, I had prod it per WP:CRYSTAL as an unsourced article about a possible future event, since the author has removed the prod I have taken it to AfD. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:25, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

No offence but......

Kindly go away. THANKS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1003:B462:BAEE:0:0:0:103 (talk) 10:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked for 36 hours for repeated vandalism. Please stop your disruptive edits.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 12:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaushals_kross

Dont Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaushals Cross (talk • contribs) 10:16, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

@Kaushals Cross: Please don´t create unsourced articles about yourself, and avoid the use of multiple accounts (for example User:Kaushals Kross) as this is a violation of our policies.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:26, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

references

not sure why are you getting involved with this! What sort of relationship do you have with wikipaedia. I can see references and I cited them and cited photos also. Do you have problem seeing them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.151.136.44 (talk) 23:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

@Fdjerew: When I tagged the article it was unsourced. After adding at least one referece to a tagged biography of a living person you can remove the tag yourself.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Firas Jerew

Not sure how on earth you had the right to delete my article. This is awful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.151.136.44 (talk) 00:08, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

@Fdjerew: I had nothing to do with the deletion of that article, prods stop been a valid deletion criteria as soon as a reference is added. Another editor tagged it for speedy deletion per WP:A7: An article about a person that did not indicate why the subject is relevant. And it was deleted by an administrator after verifying the claim. If you plan on creating more articles I suggest you review this guide Wikipedia:Your first article. Since I notice that your username is very similar to the subject of the article I also suggest your review this guideline:Wikipedia:Autobiography. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of page: BetOnThat

Hello crystalizedcarbon. You have marked my page BetOnThat for speedy deletion and I have some questions. The page relates to binary options trading. I am in this industry and would like to create and edit pages related to binary options. Having read the my first article page, I created this page as a test to see how creating and editing pages works as I am relatively new to this. I would like to be able to continue creating and editing pages on this subject with time. Would it be possible, rather than deleting this page, for me to change it to a draft and publish it at such a time that it conforms better to wikipedia standards?--Jennyeve (talk) 07:45, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia @Jennyeve: The key here is notability, you need to find at least two independent reliable sources with in depth coverage of the site. I could not find any, but if there are, please let me know and I will be happy to move it into draft space for you. Even if it gets deleted now, it does not mean that it can not be recreated in the future once it meets our guidelines. If you think that you will be able to get the sources in the future you can start working on it in your sandbox once you think it meets the criteria I would be happy to review it and if viable, help you improve it.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks @Crystallizedcarbon:. In that case you can go ahead and delete it and I can start working on pages that have more existing sources, or just edit things for now.

You are welcome @Jennyeve: If you have any questions in the future I will be happy to give you a hand.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Doug the Pug page

To whom it may concern,

I have been trying to create a page for the internet sensation Doug the Pug, but it keeps getting flagged for deletion. I'm not sure why this is happening. Doug is a very credible internet dog with a huge following. He deserves to have a wikipedia page. He has over 3.1 million followers on all his social media pages and that number is rapidly growing each day. This is the first wikipedia page I've made so please give me any advice to how I can create this page so it meets criteria.

Thank you for your help, Caitlinfoley93 (talk) 21:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Caitlinfoley93

Hello @Caitlinfoley93: Welcome to Wikipedia. The article was speedy deleted 5 times by administrators under this criteria:WP:A7. The reason is that it did not make any claim of notability for the dog. The number of followers on social media by itself is not a valid criteria for Wikipedia.

When I reviewed the last version of the article you re-created It still did not meet that policy. Instead of tagging it for speedy deletion I tagged as a proposed deletion with the following concern "Unsourced article. The only claim of notability is the number of followers on social media, is not enough for inclusion. must be referenced by independent and reliable sources and meet our general notability guidelines" to give you a chance to improve it.

I was happy to see that you followed the advice and added some reliable sources (Facebook and other self published sources do not count, but MTV and The Tennessean do), and then you removed the proposed deletion tag, which is OK since you solved the main issue with the article.

The article now has at least two reliable sources and since It seems to have sufficient coverage from independent sources I think it now meets our general notability guidelines. So thank you for your work and congratulations on your first Wikipedia article. I encourage you to keep improving it by adding relevant information that it is properly sourced with a neutral point of view. If you need help in the future you can let me know. Again welcome and enjoy your edits.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:16, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

RE: New page "In It To Win It - City Lights (Album)"

Hi Crystallizedcarbon,

Thank you for the message! I shall be adding citations to the article soon, I'm currently busy at work, but will return to editing when I've finished.

Many thanks,

Zombiesparty — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zombiesparty (talk • contribs) 14:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

@Zombiesparty: Great, thank you. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:14, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

X-Systems delete nomination

Hello Crystallizedcarbon,

I currently live in the Netherlands. And what I have to say is the following, the are curruently the only real Dutch smartphone manufacture. I have some friends at the Technical University in Eindhoven (TU/E) and as understood they are currently work together. I think, and what I hear from my friends at the TU, we will hear a lot from them in the future and this company will evolve to a international player.

I have to say, I didnt bought one myself yet. However honestly speaking, I might be interesting in the future. How many Dutch/European brands can you name which are truly designing and creating their own smartphones.

So answering your question, it is the only (durable) smartphone company in the Netherlands. And next to Phonebloks (Dutch idea, also from the area of Eindhoven), they are the only "two" smartphone companies. However, Phonebloks is still an idea (concept). And these guys from X-Systems are already in business and have mass-production of their models.

So due to the respect for them and to give others more insight of their background I created this page.. I hope you recondider your deletion as Sonim Technologies the American compeditor has its page it would be nice to give more information to others about the Dutch/European manufacture of these devices.

Have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesDawn (talk • contribs) 17:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello @JamesDawn: The issue is notability, you need to find at least two indepent references from reliable sources with in-depth coverage of the company, not just a product, and add them to the article to meet our notability requieremets for companies or our general notability guidelines. If you can not and it gets deleted, you could recreate it if in the future the company receives enough media coverage. The other company you mention does not meet those requirements either, so I will probably start a deletion discusion for it. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

@JamesDawn: I have started a deletion discussion for Sonim Technologies. Thank you for pointing it out.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 21:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alcanzar Software Solutions Pvt Ltd

Hello,

You have stated that you are deleting our article because variety of reasons. So can i know the reasons in brief? so that i can work on it. and provide me some suggestion for make it easily. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Himanshualcanzar (talk • contribs) 09:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello Himanshualcanzar. The article was deleted by an administrator because it did not include any claim of notability and it was written with promotional content. please review this two guideliness: WP:GNG and WP:CORP. The company must meet at least one of them and the text must be written using a neutral point of view. I suggest you review this guide Wikipedia:Your first article.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:25, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

I am still in the process of writing the Article of NeobuxPTC the Speedy deletion says it is promoting the company but i have tried my best not to put that data on it if there is some material that shows indications please inform me so that i could remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armghan3071 (talk • contribs) 08:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Armghan3071: The main issue with the article is that it did not follow this guidelines for establishing if a company is notable. It did not have any independent reliable sources and there was no claim of notability in the text of the article. --CrystaC (talk) 12:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Vadym Troyan aka ...

Hi Crystallizedcarbon,
Just FYI, this Vadym Troyan page has been deleted and recreated under several different name variations (by 'different' new accounts). See Troyan Vadym, Trojan VADIM and TROYAN Vadym for examples. 220 of ^Borg 09:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

I raised it at wp:AN/I, see here. 220 of ^Borg 09:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello @220 of Borg: Thank you for the heads up. I have also taken it to AFD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vadym Troyan) so that we can use G4 in the future. Regards. --Crystallized C (talk) 09:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

"Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion" WP:G4, probably a good idea. It's obviously a recreation by a sock of a blocked user too, WP:G5. We'll see what happens. 220 of ^Borg 09:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

@220 of Borg: Yes, I agree, the good thing about WP:G4 is that it will be faster, as we won´t need to go through the trouble of proving that they are socks and serve as a discouragement. Thanks to you it is in the hands of the admins now, so I am sure it will be resolved.--Crystallized C (talk) 10:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Reminder

Remember to mark your CSD pages as patrolled! JTtheOG (talk) 22:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice @JTtheOG:. I will do so.--Crystallized C (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

No problem; good work! :P JTtheOG (talk) 01:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Dennis Elsas

I received an email from you about the edits to "Dennis Elsas." I am an editor by profession and there were some inaccuracies on what was in this entry. I'm very familiar with the career of Dennis Elsas and the rise of NYC radio. I certainly do not feel that what I edited was "puffery." Could you please reinstate what I did. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bookmarkg (talk • contribs) 21:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Bookmarkg: the edits and comments you refer to were not done by me. They were done by user EightTwoThreeFiveOneZeroSevenThreeOne. As far as the content, your contributions are very much welcome, but my recomendation to you would be to re-write it trying to avoid using terms like "great", "hero", "legend", "captivating audiences" etc. Also please try to make sure that all your contributions are referenced from reliable sources. Please let me know if you need any help. Regards.--Crystallized C (talk) 00:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

• I've commented over at User talk:Bookmarkg. 823510731 (talk) 10:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Created a new page on JR Ravetz 1971 book

Dear Crystallizedcarbon

Can you please help me to understand why you removed the quotes from the page of the book of Jerome Ravetz? The book is more than 20 y old and I think the quotes I reported do not violate any copyright. As per additional references I plan to add a number of existing reviews to this work which are published in academia. I am Andrea Saltelli and I would plan to work more on this page - of course I will stop if I am discouraged. Regards Andrea Saltelli http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=7003770842 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4222-6975 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saltean (talk • contribs) 08:36, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Saltean: Your contributions are of course very welcome, but Wikipedia needs to takes copyright issues very seriously. The text that you extensively quoted is protected by a 1996 copyright by Transaction Publishers. They are still commercially exploiting that book. Limited used of quotations to support the content in the article is considered fair use and perfectly acceptable, but the extensive use of quotations is discouraged even if the material was public domain, (more in the case of copyrighted works). This two guides may be helpful to you: WP:QUOTEFARM and Wikipedia:Non-free content. I really hope that this does not discourage you. The best way to improve the article is by adding references to existing reviews as you propose. By doing so the article can meet our verifiability requirements and our general notability guidelines. If you need any help with the process let me know and I will be happy to help. Once the article meets our guidelines I will remove the tags. Regards.--Crystallized C (talk) 12:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Please define

Hola Crystallizedcarbon, en su página de usuario, ¿Qué significa "cadenas de oro de la ignorancia"? Gracias, y Dios bendiga.--Sige |д･) 16:11, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Hola @Sigehelmus: Comodidad. Las sombras no hacen daño a los ojos que se deslumbran por el sol del conocimiento. Saludos.--Crystallized C (talk) 16:34, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Scientific knowledge and its social problems

References inserted please see if the stub can be removed best Andrea Saltelli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saltean (talk • contribs) 12:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Dear @Saltean: Thank you very much for adding the needed references for the article, Good work! I have removed the Tags as the article is now referenced. I had to remove the section with the quotes, as I explained above, if you need to use a quote within the text to support a concept you can do so, however, a section with just excerpts from the book is not appropriate for a Wikipedia article. I have also added an infobox to be able to get general information at a glance. Regards.--Crystallized C (talk) 12:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

@Saltean: I have also added some simple sections to the article. Please feel free to edit the title and contents of the sections or add additional ones. having sections improves the readability of the article. Regards.--Crystallized C (talk) 13:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Date of finding of Laocoön and His Sons

I see that you have reverted several attempts to change the date of the discovery of this excellent example of art. It appears to me that the anonymous editor is thinking of a footnote in the Italian page at https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gruppo_del_Laocoonte#cite_note-7 . This footnote says: "Una recente scoperta nell’Archivio storico “Innocenzo III” di Segni di un incunabolo della Naturalis Historia di Plinio il Vecchio e riportante a margine una nota del proprietario del libro, anticipa di quattro giorni tale rinvenimento. Fu scritta da Angelo Recchia da Barbarano (Romano, Vt), giurista che tra il 1519 ed il 1550 fu a lungo al servizio delle magistrature capitoline e della Camera Apostolica, per poi divenire nel 1557 uno dei Conservatori dell’Università La Sapienza. La nota è ritenuta autorevole da Luca Calenne e Alfredo Serangeli, gli studiosi che si sono occupati della scoperta. Fin dall'inizio è, però, balzato agli occhi che la data riportata dal Recchia (cioè il quarto giorno prima delle idi di gennaio, vale a dire il 10 gennaio) non corrispondeva a quella ufficiale, considerata tale da cinquecento anni sulla base di una lettera del fiorentino Filippo Casavecchia, che poneva l’eccezionale ritrovamento della statua quattro giorni dopo, cioè il 14 dello stesso mese."

I am hoping that as a native Spanish speaker, you can read this. It's interesting to read...but, of course, there is no support for where this came from...but I sort of wish that anonymous editor (who quite possibly is an Italian speaker, not English) would find a solid reference to the source and provide it.

Of course, since it may have taken several days to dig it up, which day it was discovered really doesn't matter...and it was before the change from the Julian to the Gregorian calendar, so who REALLY knows? ;-) William J. 'Bill' McCalpin (talk) 00:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Mccalpin: I am sorry but I don't recall making those changes, please provide some diffs. Thank you.--Crystallized C (talk) 21:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay - I wasn't notified when you made this update (I don't know why) - anyway, please look at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vatican_Museums&diff=prev&oldid=689619996 and the three previous edits. I see that you made only the last one (because of no references), so I can see how it slipped your mind ;-) Anyway, the person making the original change hasn't come back yet, and maybe they won't. Too bad, if they are right and just need to supply some external confirmation...this also brings up the issue of when one linguistic version of Wikipedia materially differs from another (Italian and English in this case). Is there a project to look into such things?

William J. 'Bill' McCalpin (talk) 01:55, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Mccalpin: You are right, I did not make the connection at the time. I now did some digging, and I think this Italian article can be used to source the date of the discovery to the 14: Segni, scoperto un incunabulo con una sorprendente nota sul ritrovamento del Laocoonte nel 1506.

Feel free to use it to improve the article. Best regards.--Crystallized C (talk) 12:15, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Regarding Image Deletion

Hello,

Thank you for your concern about my picture for CALUMS. Since I just start using Wikipedia, I didn't know how it runs. I am the official person from the University and we have ownership of the picture. Tiger Lee, the photographer, took the picture for us two years ago.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidit83 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

@Davidit83: EightTwoThreeFiveOneZeroSevenThreeOne was the user that deleted the image, not me. --Crystallized C (talk) 21:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

COPYRIGHT VIOLATOIN

Thank you for your advise but we own the picture. I don't need anymore action to have permission to use it, do I? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.43.50.172 (talk) 20:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Again you are confusing me with EightTwoThreeFiveOneZeroSevenThreeOne. I have not checked your particular case, but you may want to contact WP:OTRS to prove that you are indeed the owner of the copyright. Regards.--Crystallized C (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

• I really don't know why people keep blaming you when it's me who's reverting their additions, but it's very kind of you to absorb it for me - you're a diamond ;-) 823510731 (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

@EightTwoThreeFiveOneZeroSevenThreeOne: No problem, I am glad to help. I think you should delete our conversation in your talk page about the huggle revert problem. The issue is solved and it might be creating confusion on the people that visit your talk page. Regards.--Crystallized C (talk) 21:51, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Yes, that might be what's causing the confusion - I'll remove it or archive it. 823510731 (talk) 21:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi! You marked my page PUB1100 for deletion. It's a casual workshop I am running for other students at Middlesex University and we are using the page for displaying our information and aims. How do I go about making it more acceptable? Thanks Thissmileyface (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Collective Evolution Page Speedy Deletion

Hi,

This is the creator of the wikipedia page for Collective Evolution. I'm contacting you to try and better understand why you see the page as unnecessary within the encyclopedia. Much like many other websites already featured in the encyclopedia, Collective Evolution is a very prominent website visited by many worldwide daily. I figured that a encyclopedia page that quickly provided a snapshot of the organization would be a very valuable resource for anyone to better understand the site and to determine whether or not they would like to visit it.

Wikipedia's wonderful open contribution method would also allow existing users of the site to further the information making it even more comprehensive.

I hope you understand where I am coming from, and that the speedy deletion tag can be removed and the page can be kept in place.

If not, I do truly appreciate your willingness to be contacted in this manner, and I look forward to further explanation.

Thanks!Blinkette (talk) 17:25, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Blinkette: The subject of the article does not seem to meet our notability criteria for inclusion. I have removed the speedy deletion to give you a chance to find in depth coverage from at least two independent reliable sources to see if the article could meet our minimum general notability guideliness. Also, please be aware that there should not be any inline links to external sites within the content of the article. If needed, they should be inserted in an external links section. If you think that the article will be able to meet the criteria let me know how much time you think you would need to work on it. Enjoy your edits.--Crystallized C (talk) 19:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the further information. I have a busy couple of days ahead of me but I should be able to work on it again early next week and see whether or not what I put together meets the necessary criteria. I will also be sure to move all external links to an external links section. Blinkette (talk) 22:02, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Collective Evolution Edits Made

Hi! Thank you again for giving me the time to better source and create the page for Collective Evolution. I've included a number of sources now within the article, that I hope bring it up to meeting the notability requirements of wikipedia to keep the page published. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to improve it or if there are any further issues.Blinkette (talk) 17:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Blinkette: There is still more work that needs to be done to establish notability. the company page or LinkedIn are not independent of the subject, IMDb can not be used as a reference and may only be added to the article as an external link. The kind of coverage that would help would be for example articles from newspapers or magazines. In depth coverage from independent reliable sources. The other two that you added do help but are not enough. Regards.--Crystallized C (talk) 16:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for further information. I've worked on the page even more, thanks to your suggestions, and have added a number of additional sources/ coverage. I truly hope that this is enough to keep the page up, and I will be to continually look for and add more source as they become available. Blinkette (talk) 17:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Evangelos S. Eleftheriou Copyright issues

Hi, Evangelos provided me his biography, which he used both for his IBM profile and Wikipedia. So there are no copyright issues. Let me know if this is still an issue. Ibmzrl (talk) 15:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC) ibmzrl Ibmzrl (talk) 15:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Ibmzrl: You need to provide proof that you have the permission of the copyright holder to WP:OTRS. Also please keep in mind that if he is the author of the posted text it can be considered autopromotion and it's strongly discouraged, please read Wikipedia:Autobiography.--Crystallized C (talk) 16:03, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

New Article.

Hello, I have a bit more work to do on this person's life story. He is a writer and a clothing designer who is rising up into stardom, now. Just thought it would be appropriate to write about him. Thanks. LiveandDieFree (talk) 07:03, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Creating Vision Incorporation

Dear Crystallizedcarbon, Hello ! :) Hope you dont neglect my message here ! But i have something important to discuss with you and hope to get a reply from you ! Anyways, what i wanted to discuss about is creating my "Vision Incorporation" article on Wikipedia and i am not an expert in editiing or making pages in wikipedia but i really want to contribute. And you said that how my subject is important to become a part of world's largest online encyclopedia is that you must have heard of Bill Gates or Microsoft or even Mark Zukerberg or you might have heard of Arfa Kareem who was a 16 year old teen who was became world's youngest MS professional in between 2004-2006 you can even search her on wikipedia and read its article and so it was the times when not much technology was improved and not even iphone was released so basically in today's world as we all know that Android and IOS or Windows and MAC OS are the part of our daily lives and nowadays many people can buy a PC or code in JAVA or C++ or C-Sharp but still even today, many people create great things and so they are aknowledged and so they are encouraged and then they try to build more creative stuff for all of us like in 2014, a software named Buildbox was introduced which has now changed the mobile gaming as now nearly 10,000 games for IOS, ANDROID, MAC are built in it so WE all (including me and you) should encourage those who are not being encouraged by others and i am pretty sure that you know if a kid loses hopes then it means one tree of the future has died... So i only tried to help the Teen who has developed and created his own Tech company for Apps, Games and Software ! which he creates all by himself. So hope you understand what i mean but if you still think its not a good idea to make an article about that then its okay :) You can easily reply me with a "NO" message which i wouldnt mind so feel free to reply any words you want. Best Regards Safeer Ahmed ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SafeerAhmedAbro (talk • contribs) 08:45, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Dear @SafeerAhmedAbro: I do not want to discourage anybody. As long as the subject meets the minimum notability criteria I would be happy to help you with the process. Please start by reading our general notability guidelines and the notability guidelines for corporations. The company must meet at least one of these sets of requirements. If you can find needed in-depth coverage from at least two independent reliable sources, I suggest you start by making a draft on your sandbox. If you do, I would be happy to review it for you, guide you along the process and help you with any issues. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Hello Crystallizedcarbon: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:05, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas!!
	Hello, I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year, Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia!    –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 19:12, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Veled-i Yaniç Mosque

Hi! May I ask why you find this article irrelevant? I added just the sources. It is a mosque, which was built at the 15. century. It should not be irrelevant I think. Saitcank (talk) 20:52, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Saitcank: Thank you for improving the article. The notability tag was added because as it was written there was no claim of its notability, according to this proposal, being built in 15th century may not be enough to establish it. Also the article did not have any sources at that time. Thank you for following the advice on your talk page. By referencing it you have improved the article and it now meets our general notability guidelines so I have removed the tag. Good work. I hope that you will continue improving the article by expanding its contents. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Alexander Tornquist

Hi Crystallizedcarbon !

Thanks for your message concerning the article on Alexander Tornquist. I have now added links to the Swedish and German Wikipedia pages, which are properly referenced. I don't know if that counts as a proper reference. Best Wishes, 216Kleopatra (talk) 10:31, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello @216Kleopatra: Unfortunatelly it does not, you can use the references on those articles even if they are not in English, but you must add them as inline citations to the article on the English project. To do it you can use the following templates {{Cite web}}, {{Cite news}} and {{Cite book}}, or you can use the cite on the menu at the top of the edit window and then select form the templates list the one you want to use. Just fill in the parameters you want and they will be formatted for you. Or you can follow this link for instructions. If you have trouble or questions, feel free to drop me a message and I will be happy to show you how to do it. You must also verify that all the text is sourced by the references, I searched for mentions to Alexander in Geologie von Mitteleuropa included as a reference in the German's project article and I could not find a single mention. Regards.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:17, 26 December 2015 (UTC)