User talk:Mccalpin

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! >: Roby Wayne ^{Talk • Hist} 04:01, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Xplor International

A tag has been placed on Xplor International, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Xplor International and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Spiesr (talk) 20:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been cleaned up...needs more references, perhaps...

William J. 'Bill' McCalpin (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding this self-promotion to Wikipedia

A tag has been placed on Xplor international, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Xplor international and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Qworty (talk) 08:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been cleaned up...needs more references, perhaps...

William J. 'Bill' McCalpin (talk) 05:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xplor international

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Xplor international, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? The Evil Spartan (talk) 16:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been cleaned up...needs more references, perhaps...

William J. 'Bill' McCalpin (talk) 05:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The demise of Latin

That's fine with me Bill - I'll change it in a minute if you have not already done so. What I meant was, no one now speaks Latin as a native language - native Latin speakers came to speak the Romance languages - you cannot study with any persons who currently learned Latin at their mother's knee. As for the demise, don't we all reach a demise? I am sure you cannot suppose Latin speakers living on into eternity speaking their language. I don't know how you must have interpreted demise. We all have one and so did they. I think you must be denying death there. Classics does not endow individuals with eternal life. However what you want to say is an acceptable periphrastic without us having to face the awful death in our encyclopedic reading as we sit in out comfortable studios under our warm and dry roofs while others go out and die for the privilege of us continuing to speak our language until we too actually die. When I die my English is going with me, I'm pretty sure. Cato had a demise too I am pretty sure. There is no reason however why I should not oblige you. I think your words are good and true. Thanks for suggesting the change. By the way I think the article is pretty good. I will be checking it mainly to make sure it does not imply wrong things, is up to date, has enough references so I can get the tag off, and does not repeat what was said under Latin. If possible I would like to see the Latin write-up in here but not at the expense of this article's integrity. Also I want to make sure this article is up-to-date vis-a-vis the current state of Wikipedia. Thanks again for your interest and for running your concepts by me.Dave (talk) 15:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, Bill. But, I only expanded a little on the concepts previously presented. Most philological concepts are not precise. Good luck with your website. Don't let the halloween goblins get you down. Ciao.Dave (talk) 22:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ravenna pronunciation

Hi Bill! I replied on my talk page. Kragen Javier Sitaker (talk) 07:45, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Amir Omar

On July 2, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Amir Omar, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

NW (Talk) 06:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EAR

Hello Mccalpin. The article Richardson, Texas has been the subject of a discussion at EAR. Among the comments were suggestions that the contributors could consider discussing any issues on the article's talk page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:57, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Kudpung. I have been away from this page for too long...I will try to keep the children in line... ;-) William J. 'Bill' McCalpin (talk) 02:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you taking leadership on it? I have been trying to find someone in that position so I welcome it if so. I have a comment regarding the tense of the article; it seems to be written in present tense whereas I think it would be a better long term strategy to specify the time frame. If this is wrong for some reason I am anxious to learn. Thanks. Cor resident (talk) 08:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The new lead paragraph seems a bit slanted to me. It speaks of Richardson only in terms of businesses and overlooks the basic fact that half the area of the city is residential, places where people live. This most fundamental need for human habitation as well as a place where individuals and families can be sovereign helps maintain balance and sanity in society. In my view the whole article focuses on economic features and worships the almighty dollar without consideration of societal matters. Cor resident (talk) 10:23, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Richardson Improvement Corporation

In researching the article on Richardson, Texas I have encountered some references to a non-profit corporation co-mingled with the City municipal corporation. It seems that Bill Keffler is the president of RIC and an Asst. City Manager is the V.P. This is an arrangement that opens all sorts of room for corruption and I have found other sources that allege actual malfeasance. I am trying to find more information and I wonder if you can shed any light on this subject. Thank you. Cor resident (talk) 16:18, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 06:12, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I want to thank you for your invitation, but I am concerned that my Romanian is "read-only" in the data processing point of view. In fact, I don't remember what I edited, although it doesn't surprise me that I did so, since I have edited certain articles in most Romance languages...after all, Romanian is just Latin with Slavic loan words instead of Germanic and Arabic loan words...heh heh, no doubt many philologists have just had heart attacks ;-)

Still, there are limits, as I am sure you can imagine.

I wish you success in your endeavors and will probably still make an edit or two in my oh-so-slow Romanian ;-)

William J. 'Bill' McCalpin (talk) 03:57, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Laura Gibbs Maczka, Mayor Pro Tem of Richardson, Texas.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Laura Gibbs Maczka, Mayor Pro Tem of Richardson, Texas.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 05:00, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Mccalpin. You have new messages at Patchy1's talk page.
Message added 21:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-- Patchy1 21:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blanc du Bois has been accepted

Blanc du Bois, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 07:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mccalpin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]