User talk:Clive sweeting

This Wikipedian is deceased. Respectful comments of remembrance may be left below.

Hello, Clive sweeting, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Deb 16:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please wikify

Dear editor, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for your recent contributions. I would like to ask you, however, to format your new articles according to Wikipedia style and include links to other articles in your new additions. Also, you might want to add stub tags to smaller articles, making it easier for other editors to find and improve your new additions. Happy editing! ---Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 12:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome! I noticed your comment on Saint Caesarius of Arles. Many of Wikipedia articles are taken without much updating from much older encyclopedias. Sometimes that means that they are actually very outdated. I always take any article which says that it was taken from the Catholic Encyclopedia or the 1911 Encyclopedia Brittanica (sp) with a very large grain of salt, especially if it hasn't been edited much by other people. If you have the resources and will to fix up such articles, you are encouraged to. Frankly, I find these articles to be very frustrating, since sometimes they contain very outdated information, and information which is presented as fact which is little better than myth. You'd be helping Wikipedia and other curious people if you could update articles. I hope you enjoy your time here, and feel free to ask me any questions you might have. Mak (talk) 18:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

R G C Levens

You have recently re-created the article R G C Levens, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. --stephenw32768^<talk> 19:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SEERI

SEERI has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this organization or company might not yet be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 06:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Instructions to nominate an article for review. ~ trialsanderrors 20:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Dowsett

I came across this article while Wikifying today, and saw your comments on the talk page about notability. I didn't put the notability tag on this article, but my guess is that it's there because the article is extremely short (only two sentences) and not referenced. If you have more material on the subject, please add it (and cite your sources). RedRollerskate 05:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P g westlake

A tag has been placed on P g westlake, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ArglebargleIV 19:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Before attempting to recreate this page I should be grateful to know where the earlier article has gone----Clive Sweeting Ps A restored and slightly increased article has been deleted without any apparent reason being given or a discussion of suitability----Clive Sweeting

Little context in Bishop of Raphoe

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bishop of Raphoe, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bishop of Raphoe is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bishop of Raphoe, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A request

Clive, can you take a look at Wikipedia style? The additions you're making to Bishop of Raphoe and other articls are useful, but it would also help if you could format your text so that it fits with the style of the article and Wikipedia editing standards -- thanks!!! -- ArglebargleIV 11:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gwynno james

A tag has been placed on Gwynno james requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. αѕєηιηє ^t/_c 14:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gwynno james

I have nominated Gwynno james, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwynno james. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. αѕєηιηє ^t/_c 16:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of John Morgan (bishop)

A tag has been placed on John Morgan (bishop) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ziggy Saw dust 19:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, John Morgan (bishop). While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you. Triwbe (talk) 11:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration of John Morgan (bishop)

Hi there. I saw you recreated the article with comments instead of content. I've restored the article's last good version, then added tags to address the concerns held. Please read these concerns carefully. Most importantly is the concern of notability. Morgan must pass the criteria for notability or he will not be able to keep on as an article. This may include the Welsh version as well. My recommendation to you is to read the tags on the article carefully and address the concerns as quickly as possible. I will tag with {{inuse}} so that you can work on it for a while without it being tagged for speedy deletion before you're finished. Any questions, feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. Cheers and happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 11:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dean of Llandaff

A tag has been placed on Dean of Llandaff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 18:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dean of Llandaff

Hi Clive. I have restored this article and tidied it up. If you add "wikilinks" to notable people, places or concepts in articles you create (ie, [[London]] rather than London produces London) it will allow people to get a sense of context for the articles. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia - I am sorry you had to navigate Deletion Review! Neıl ☎ 15:00, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. It helps if you sign your comments on talk pages with four tildes - like so: ~~~~. Please feel free to get in touch if you have any questions or problems in future. Best, Neıl ☎ 09:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gabriel Hebert

A tag has been placed on Gabriel Hebert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 15:23, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Geoffrey Hugo Lampe

A tag has been placed on Geoffrey Hugo Lampe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. llamadog903 (talk) 13:13, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA review page

I'm not sure, but I think what you meant to do is edit Wikipedia:RfA Review/Question/Responses here and add the following single line at the bottom of the page:

* [[User:Clive sweeting/RfA review]] added by ~~~ at ~~~~~

Hope this helps. — Athaenara ✉ 18:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Marcel Richard

A tag has been placed on Marcel Richard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 07:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Subhalmaran

A tag has been placed on Subhalmaran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironho lds 09:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

request deletion review--- Clive sweeting 24 October2016

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to French people, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. _{El Greco}^(talk) 21:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Laudian Professor of Arabic

Thanks for recently creating Laudian Professor of Arabic. Some people have since added some links and I have added some more. However, the names

Thomas Hunt (1739)
Joseph White (1777)

both just link to disambiguation pages, where the right people don't seem to be represented. Is it possible that they have wikipedia pages under slightly different versions of their names? Also, my information is that D. S. Margoliouth took the post in 1889, while you have 1899. What was your source? You must be right----Clive SweetingSamuelTheGhost (talk) 22:26, 1 August 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 16:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eryl Thomas

Why have you removed details of the offence for which Eryl Thomas had to resign his archbishopric? It was a huge scandal at the time - and indicative of the times, it possibly wouldn't happen now - and what is more is the truth, as one suspects you know. As it is it reads as if he resigned because he got a speeding fine or the like. Wikipedia must carry all the facts about a person, not just be a hagiography. Bedwasboy (talk) 06:00, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additions to Culture of France

I have moved your recent additions on Catholicism to the talk page of Talk:Culture of France. Feel free to move them back once verifiable sources/references for the material are added. Remember, the wikipedia needs to be free of original research. Also: please use edit summaries on all your edits. Thanks - NYArtsnWords (talk) 23:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting the word "Turkish"

Please stop deleting the word "Turkish" from Montreux Convention Regarding the Regime of the Turkish Straits and Turkish Straits. In the first case, you're breaking the link to Turkish Straits; in the second case, "Turkish Straits" is a straight translation of the term Türk Boğazları and the sentence you're leaving behind is nonsensical ("The term Straits (Turkish: Türk Boğazları) in northwestern Turkey refers to the two narrow straits that connect the Sea of Marmara..." I don't know if this is a case of Turcophobia or whatever, but it needs to stop. -- ChrisO (talk) 09:30, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tree of Jesse window

A pic for the gallery would be nice! Amandajm (talk) 09:30, 23 September 2008 (UTC) A photograph of the Lady Chapel now features[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nikolaos P. Xionis

A tag has been placed on Nikolaos P. Xionis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 13:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford University deletions

Greetings! You keep making comments about a rash of deletions in the Oxford University page on the main page of WikiProject Universities. That's really not the proper place to raise those sorts of issues. You're welcome to start a new section on talk page of that same project, though. Cheers! Esrever ^(klaT) 02:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I moved your comment from the main page to Talk. Please use the Talk page in the future. --ElKevbo (talk) 15:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xexakis, Nikolaos

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Xexakis, Nikolaos, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The article does not assert any particular notability of the subject

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Regards, Constantine ✍ 05:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Church of England

Hello, in your edit] to the Church of England, you removed a large amount of material, including links to other wikipedias and external sites. I assume that this was a mistake on your part and reverted the entire edit. Loves Macs (talk) 14:55, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

French National School for the Judiciary

See Talk:French National School for the Judiciary. Thanks. --Edcolins (talk) 18:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Smith (bishop)

I have added some information, categories and a reference to this article. I note that the date of death you gave is different from that given by Le Neve, but I don't have access to your sources, so feel free to change if you are confident of the date -- or make any comments necessary. --Boson (talk) 17:41, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiff

Hi Clive. I noticed you made a number of recent changes to Cardiff, one of which has been reverted by another editor, and some of which I have amended. A lot of work is being done on this article (not by me, I hasten to add), to try to bring it up to Featured Article standard. It is therefore particularly important that, when editing, the added content is of an exceptionally high standard. The prose used must be "engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard" and all claims must be verifiable and supported by inline citations. None of your edits provided citations, and I have marked these as being required. When you get the chance, hopefully soon, can you please provide the citations required. If you need any help on how to do this I will be glad to assist. Just leave a note here and I will keep a watch out. I know it's not easy getting your head round the various wikipedia conventions and the multitude of style guides, and we all slip up from time to time, so don't worry too much about it. Most articles are nowhere near Featured Article standard, so it isn't usually a massive problem. Skinsmoke (talk) 16:31, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Clive sweeting! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Nikolaos P. Xionis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Demetrios Tzerpos - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Christodoulos Sabbatos - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Michel Meslin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Georges Gilson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tardieu, Michel

The article Tardieu, Michel has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RadioFan (talk) 12:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tardieu, Michel

A tag has been placed on Tardieu, Michel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 12:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ano Ilisia

A tag has been placed on Ano Ilisia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WackyWace ^talk 17:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference...

If you wish to challenge the speedy deletion of a page, please write {{hangon}}, do not just write "hangon" in the page or it might go unnoticed. ;) Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 20:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 April 30

I've reverted your May 8 and May 9 edits to Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 April 30. Your comments came well after the close of the discussion in question, so they really can't be added. If you wish to contest the May 6 deletion of Michel Tardieu, you should talk to the deleting admin, JzG (talk · contribs), who may have been unaware of the deletion review discussion. (The log of Tardieu, Michel has the prior speedy deletion and a link to the DRV.) — Scientizzle 21:49, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

advice

The article on Ano Ilisia, though incorrectly speedied, is unlikely to be kept at the end without some actual references. Please give some at the deletion review; some people will not reverse an incorrect speedy that wont pass afd. As a general rule, it saves a lot of trouble to add refs immediately when you write an article. DGG ( talk ) 23:05, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Michel Tardieu

I have nominated Michel Tardieu, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Tardieu. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Guy (Help!) 09:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Synge

I just patrolled this page, and I have a question. Do you plan to expand the article with more information about Edward himself, or is this page about his family in general? If it's going to be about the family rather than about Edward specifically, it should probably be moved to a different name such as "Synge family" or something similar. Please let me know. You can reply here: I will be watching this page. Thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marcos Manoles

Hello - I just encountered the above on new page patrol and wanted to add some references. However, a web search for the name is returning absolutely nothing. Do you have any sources you can reference in the article to demonstrate that its subject meets notability criteria? Was a different spelling of his name sometimes used, for example? Without references to reliable sources the page is liable to be proposed for deletion, so if you could add some you'll very likely prolong its life on Wikipedia. Gonzonoir (talk) 10:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marcos Manoles

The article Marcos Manoles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No credible, third-party sources, no indication of any wider notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 20:47, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there: I've added a question to this article's talk page because there are still no references sufficient to verify the article's claims - if you have a look there you'll see some pointers on the kind of sources we'd need. Thanks. Gonzonoir (talk) 15:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the article as you requested, because articles deleted through proposed deletion can be restored per anyone's request (and the deletion itself can be contested by anyone for essentially any reason), but the article still is unsourced and as you see above there don't seem to be any sources to be found for this individual. I'll be taking the article to Articles for Deletion so that it can be discussed whether or not to delete the article, you can argue for its inclusion there. I will notify you when the discussion begins, thank you. -- Atama頭 22:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marcos Manoles for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Marcos Manoles, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcos Manoles until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Atama頭 22:22, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christodoulos Sabbatos

The article Christodoulos Sabbatos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N, WP:V -- can't find reliable, secondary sources on which to demonstrate the notability or existence of this putative academic under the WP:GNG, etc.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. j⚛e decker ^talk 20:11, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christodoulos Sabbatos for deletion

The article Christodoulos Sabbatos is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christodoulos Sabbatos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:46, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Demetrios Tzerpos restored as per request

Demetrios Tzerpos has been restored as a contested proposed deletion at your request. However, as an unsourced BLP (something which was pointed out to you eleven months ago), the article, as it exists, is in violation of Wikipedia's WP:BLP policy requiring that statements about living persons be verified (WP:V) by reliable sources (WP:RS), and without those sources, I or another editor will feel forced to send the article towards Articles for Deletion in the near future, the best way to preserve the information you've provided at Tzerpos is to add those citations. I have nothing against you nor Mr. Tzerpos! Just show me the citations, and we'll be on the same side of this discussion! By the way, one thing I should note--there's no requirement that the reliable sources for this article be in English. Where reliable secondary English sources are available that's preferred, but if part of the challenge is finding references in English, but (say) Greek references are plentiful, then that's fine. Have a great day, and please leave me a note at User Talk:Joe Decker if you have questions or concerns. Thanks! --j⚛e decker ^talk 16:57, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Demetrios Tzerpos for deletion

The article Demetrios Tzerpos is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demetrios Tzerpos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 20:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of clergymen

Hi, I started a discussion as to the notability of clergymen at Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Clergymen, your input is welcome. J04n(talk page) 15:26, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gerard Daucourt

The article Gerard Daucourt has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. France3470 (talk) 16:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saint Ephrem Ecumenical Research Institute

The article Saint Ephrem Ecumenical Research Institute has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 21:03, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that St. Ephrem Ecumenical Research Institute was re-instated after an earlier discussion----Clive Sweeting

Speedy deletion nomination of Jules Leroy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jules Leroy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:08, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joseph Hajjar

The article Joseph Hajjar has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker ^{talk to me} 21:31, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frederick Percy Harton

The article Frederick Percy Harton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 03:12, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Edward Tenison

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Edward Tenison requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AKS (talk) 18:01, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

As reviewing administrator, I removed the tag; he became a bishop , which is always notable . But it would help to add some references to specific pages of some modern source, & links to scholarly articles, not just a primary source. This is especially true when the article makes a judgment, as this one did.

In fact, if you kept this in mind for all of your articles, it would help avoid unwarranted nominations for deletion. For authors with published books, I usually add a reference to their individual books on WorldCat (or similar).

Remember that 95% of the editors here do not understand or appreciate the academic humanities, especially those parts of it related in any way to religion. I & the others who do understand will help your articles avoid deletion, but it would help if you wrote them so completely from the start as to make the importance obvious. DGG ( talk ) 00:34, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tenison is in the Dictionary of National Biography, and the clue to that is the page linking to it from Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/DNB Epitome 56. The DNB is being posted (in its old edition) at Wikisource, and volume 56 is one of the volumes now complete (the project to post the first edition is now about two-thirds done). I mention this because the DNB article s:Tenison, Edward (DNB00) is useful here, and the text can be used (with the {{DNB}} template). I've added the link to Edward Tenison, naturally. For more on the DNB here, see WP:WP DNB. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from Vicipaedia

Good afternoon, Clive. I thought I'd leave you a message here because I haven't seen you on Vicipaedia recently. Just to say that I'm glancing through a set of biographies at present, some of which are Welsh, many of which are yours. I will be editing them -- only lightly, because I like the way you write Latin! -- but mainly to ensure that place-names, other people, universities and what not are properly linked. Of course, if you notice that I make any mistakes, correct them. Best wishes Andrew Dalby 11:44, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Order of the Garter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Strong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:44, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bernard Coulie

The article Bernard Coulie has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. §FreeRangeFrog 18:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adamantius (journal) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bernard Coulie, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Georgian and Armenian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eutherios of Tyana, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cerf, Diatribe and Alexander of Hierapolis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eutherios of Tyana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schwartz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook

Hello Clive sweeting,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook

The article Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication why this would be a notable book. No article on the Congress exists. If kept, the article needs a much better title

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 14:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of E T Davies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article E T Davies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E T Davies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. miszatomic 14:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph Hajjar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Hajjar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Hajjar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 19:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

`{{Unreferenced}}` tag on Christine Mohrmann

An editor has tagged Christine Mohrmann, an article which you have created or worked on, as {{Unreferenced}}. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia, but when adding content (particularly for facts and figures), please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing, especially when adding information about living persons that is even remotely contentious. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – Fayenatic London 22:30, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph A. Munitiz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leuven University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Norman Powell Williams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lady Margaret Professor of Divinity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Florent Du Bois de Villerabel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Enos and Aenos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Jean-Pierre Batut#Questionable source

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Jean-Pierre Batut#Questionable source. Thanks. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:16, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jean-Pierre Batut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Council of Nicaea. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries, please

Hello, Clive. Here are a couple of general editing suggestions for you to consider:

Please make a habit of providing an edit summary when you make a change to an article. Doing so makes it easier for your colleagues here to understand the intention of your edit.
Plus, it will be easier for you and your co-editors to collaborate on articles if, instead of making multiple consecutive edits in rapid succession on an article, you use the "Show preview" button to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits. This keeps the page history of the article less cluttered.

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 16:15, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manlio Simonetti

The article Manlio Simonetti has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Lakun.patra (talk) 15:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Popular Patristics Series

Hello, Clive sweeting,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Popular Patristics Series should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popular Patristics Series .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 19:08, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michel Spanneut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nord. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armenian Genocide recognition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Bryce. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Claudio Moreschini

The article Claudio Moreschini has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 15:39, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did not delete your page

So you can't quite ask me to restore it as it was a admin. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 02:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Florent Du Bois de Villerabel

Hello. Could you please add in-line references throughout Florent Du Bois de Villerabel? I am interested in finding out more about this archbishop and will try to find some references, but it would help if you referenced what you added. The content is very controversial and if not referenced, it will be deleted. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 11:26, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Etienne Fouilloux

Hello, Clive sweeting. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Etienne Fouilloux, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Etienne Fouilloux to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 17:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Signature on talk pages

I see that you are signing your talk page contributions by hand rather than using the standard shortcut: if you don't know how to do this you might find Wikipedia:Signatures helpful. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 18:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nikolaos Xenakis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikolaos Xenakis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikolaos Xenakis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Tavix ^(talk) 04:13, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christopher Rice Mansel Talbot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Michael's College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Nikolaos P. Xionis

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Nikolaos P. Xionis to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Tseung Kwan O (talk) 09:05, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hausherr Irénée

The article Hausherr Irénée has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NgYShung ^huh? 10:25, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Clive sweeting. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clemens Scholten

Hello, Clive sweeting. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Clemens Scholten, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Clemens Scholten to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Baron Hill (house)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Baron Hill (house)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 05:53, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Methodios Fouiyas

Hello, Clive sweeting. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Methodios Fouiyas, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Methodios Fouiyas to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Sulaimandaud (talk) 16:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello. You recently removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Methodios Fouiyas, and I wanted to let you know that it has been replaced. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Sulaimandaud (talk) 10:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Methodios Fouiyas

The article Methodios Fouiyas has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sulaimandaud (talk) 10:14, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to June Osborne, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 19:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dingestow Court

Clive, appreciate your addition to the above. But references are essential to Wikipedia. Could you add one. Thanks and regards. KJP1 (talk) 20:26, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clive, have tidied it up to make it an in-line citation. KJP1 (talk) 15:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pamphilus the Theologian

The article Pamphilus the Theologian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced. Uses language like 'was probably a ...', suggesting that even the author does not know why this subject deserves a page. Fails notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sb2001 ^{talk page} 19:43, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sylvester Lloyd

Hello Clive sweeting,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sylvester Lloyd for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Qaei ☎ 20:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Downside School article - Child abuse section

Hello Clive Sweeting, I have started a new section on the Talk page of the Downside School article in the hope of broadening the debate about your removal of sourced content to other editors, with the aim of achieving consensus on the way forward:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Downside_School#Child_abuse_section_-_removal_of_content

Peteinterpol (talk) 21:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Clive Sweeting, I have just reverted a change you made to my edit on the Downside School talk page. Please do not edit my contributions. Peteinterpol (talk) 16:19, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit contributions I make to a Talk page

You must not edit contributions made by another editor on a Talk page. Please stop doing so on the Downside School page or I will have to report you. Peteinterpol (talk) 17:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page etiquette

Hello. Please don't change the text of talk page headers created by others. Some editors use such headers to link to discussions. Thank you. By the way, I've reverted your change to the article section on Chrysostom' views about homosexuality; as you'll see if you read the cited content there, he also condemns female homosexuality. I've no strong opinion on whether the section should be titled "Homophobic discourse" or "Views on homosexuality". Haploidavey (talk) 17:27, 13 October 2017 (UTC) In response, I created the header in question and have not changed it but restored it. Similarly I did not initiate change to the main page. I restoring am therefore both original headings.Clive_sweeting[reply]

But it was my comments on the talk page to start with! So you've created a heading that isn't yours to create.Contaldo80 (talk) 08:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Clive sweeting! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 13:23, Tuesday, October 17, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Please stop

Stop being so disruptive. Contaldo80 (talk) 08:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clive stop being so annoying. You're a very clumsy editor and your interventions are getting quite irritating. Maybe (looking at the others comments on this talk page) it's time you gave it all a rest. Contaldo80 (talk) 13:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Clive sweeting. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iveagh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dromore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Claude Hagège

I have reverted your edits on the Claude Hagège page. While the remarks you had added might be accurate, they are anecdotal. Let us not start an edit war: if you think these remarks should be included in the article, explain why on the talk page and let us wait before a consensus is reached before editing the article again.

Best, Malparti (talk) 13:50, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adamantius (journal)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adamantius (journal), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Randykitty (talk) 12:57, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Talbot, 1st Baron Talbot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cappadocia (Roman province), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fortunatianus of Aquileia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 23:00, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Allen Giles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ampère (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conrad Rittershuys moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Conrad Rittershuys, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:18, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 09:59, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon

Hello there, please do not move the draftified articles to main space without addressing the issues. I will suggest you to add references and submit the draft for review instead of creating it at article space. Please note that the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Hitro talk 05:26, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me! Draft;Meliton, Metropolitanof Chalcedon has been blocked by two admins despite additions

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...Draft:Meliton,Metropolitan of Chalcedon has been unreaonably blocked by two administrators despite 15 amendments to the draft.

Clive sweeting (talk) 14:30, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Clive sweeting[reply]

Helped. Hi Clive. The draft is still at Draft:Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon, it has not been "blocked". Happy editing, Sam Sailor 14:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Clive sweeting. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Clive sweeting. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon (December 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Rejecting this, because you just resubmtted without any improvements at all. Does not appear it will make it through AfC process.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:22, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Clive sweeting! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:22, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 12:24, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Conrad Rittershuys

Hello, Clive sweeting. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Conrad Rittershuys.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meliton again

Let's see. What keeps getting you rejected? 1) You can't just throw down some article titles at the bottom of a page and call them "References". We expect properly linked in-line references, formatted in any of the ways we use. 2) The tone is breezy and informal ("no friend of the Regime of the Colonels" in particular pops up as the sort of thing a newspaper columnist might write, but not an encyclopedist). 3) You aren't wikilinking even the most technical terms. Remember, the average reader here may not be clear on the exact nature of the Greek Orthodox religion, far less what a "metropolitan" is; and don't even get me started on tria nomina! --Orange Mike | Talk 18:47, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm having trouble finding additional sources on this - what is Meliton's secular name?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv🍁 14:40, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 15:11, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

references are not sufficiently detailed to verify

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:35, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon has been accepted

Meliton, Metropolitan of Chalcedon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 17:31, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copied over from my talk page. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 17:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hugh Ferguson Jones moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hugh Ferguson Jones, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:28, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugh Ferguson Jones (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft does not demonstrate that it can pass WP:NPOL or the general notability guidelines. Please see those pages for more information. More WP:SIGCOV ought to be included and sources placed inline at the points in the text to which they refer. See WP:REFB for a guide to how to do this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hugh Ferguson Jones and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hugh Ferguson Jones, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 13:53, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugh Ferguson Jones (December 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CaptainEek was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No improvement since last submission.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 08:10, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roman Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Damasus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hugh Ferguson Jones concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hugh Ferguson Jones, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hugh Ferguson Jones

Hello, Clive sweeting. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hugh Ferguson Jones".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:07, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proculus, bishop of Marseilles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Proculus, bishop of Marseilles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proculus, bishop of Marseilles (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft is unreferenced. Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources with citations placed inline pet the guidelines at WP:REFB. Please also review the general notability guidelines and the more specific religious ones at WP:NPRIEST.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Proculus, bishop of Marseilles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Proculus, bishop of Marseilles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 14:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Proculus, bishop of Marseilles has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Proculus, bishop of Marseilles. Thanks! Eagleash (talk) 15:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proculus, bishop of Marseilles has been accepted

Proculus, bishop of Marseilles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 17:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Death

When searching for Clive Sweeting online, I came across a notice of death which I'm fairly sure relates to this contributor.

R.I.P. Simon Grant (talk) 15:52, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please wikify

Welcome!

R G C Levens

Little context in Bishop of Raphoe

A request

Speedy deletion of Gwynno james

AfD nomination of Gwynno james

Speedy deletion of John Morgan (bishop)

April 2008

Restoration of John Morgan (bishop)

Speedy deletion of Dean of Llandaff

Speedy deletion of Gabriel Hebert

Speedy deletion of Geoffrey Hugo Lampe

Your RfA review page

Notability of Marcel Richard

Speedy deletion of Subhalmaran

July 2008

Laudian Professor of Arabic

Eryl Thomas

Additions to Culture of France

Deleting the word "Turkish"

Tree of Jesse window

Speedy deletion of Nikolaos P. Xionis

Oxford University deletions

Proposed deletion of Xexakis, Nikolaos

Unreferenced BLPs

Proposed deletion of Tardieu, Michel

Speedy deletion nomination of Tardieu, Michel

Speedy deletion nomination of Ano Ilisia

For future reference...

advice

Articles for deletion nomination of Michel Tardieu

Proposed deletion of Marcos Manoles

Nomination of Marcos Manoles for deletion

Proposed deletion of Christodoulos Sabbatos

Nomination of Christodoulos Sabbatos for deletion

Demetrios Tzerpos restored as per request

Nomination of Demetrios Tzerpos for deletion

Notability of clergymen

Proposed deletion of Gerard Daucourt

Proposed deletion of Saint Ephrem Ecumenical Research Institute

Speedy deletion nomination of Jules Leroy

Proposed deletion of Joseph Hajjar

Proposed deletion of Frederick Percy Harton

Speedy deletion nomination of Edward Tenison

Status and Advice

Greetings from Vicipaedia

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Proposed deletion of Bernard Coulie

May 2013

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Speedy deletion nomination of Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook

Proposed deletion of Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook

Nomination of Cyngres yr Eglwys yng Nghymru 1953Welsh Church Handbook for deletion

Nomination of E T Davies for deletion

Nomination of Joseph Hajjar for deletion

{{Unreferenced}} tag on Christine Mohrmann

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Talk:Jean-Pierre Batut#Questionable source

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Edit summaries, please

Proposed deletion of Manlio Simonetti

Deletion discussion about Popular Patristics Series

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Proposed deletion of Claudio Moreschini

I did not delete your page

Proposed deletion of Etienne Fouilloux

Signature on talk pages

Nomination of Nikolaos Xenakis for deletion

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Your article Nikolaos P. Xionis

Proposed deletion of Hausherr Irénée

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Proposed deletion of Clemens Scholten

Merger discussion for Baron Hill (house)

`{{Unreferenced}}` tag on Christine Mohrmann