Jump to content

User talk:Carlossfsu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Carlossfsu! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Bernstein2291 (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Dates

[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you linked a date or two at Yarra Jets. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Ohconfucius (talk) 07:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fantastic Voyage (Lakeside song)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Fantastic Voyage (Lakeside song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jamie Shaw (talk) 08:01, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Save the Overtime (For Me)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Save the Overtime (For Me) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jamie Shaw (talk) 08:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dance Floor, Part 1

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dance Floor, Part 1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jamie Shaw (talk) 08:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lovelite (song)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Lovelite (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jamie Shaw (talk) 08:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speed Deletion Nomination Mistake

[edit]

Sorry, for nominating these articles it was a mistake. I have taken these tags back off. once again sorry.--Jamie Shaw (talk) 08:07, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

R&B number-ones

[edit]

Hi there, thanks for working on creating these. Just a few things... please be aware of naming conventions in article titles. Incidental words and prepostions such as "The", "A", "An", "With", etc. should not be capitalized unless it is the first word in the title (see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums#Capitalization for more). Also be sure to add categories to the articles. Two easy ones are "Category:19xx singles" (for the year of release) and "Category:Billboard Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs number-one singles", since they are U.S. R&B number-ones. You may also want to add a stub tag since the new articles need expansion (WP:SONGS#Stubs). Any other questions just ask. Thanks - eo (talk) 22:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, when naming new song articles, you don't have to include the (Name of artist song) within the title of the article. This is only to disambiguate the article name if there is already an article by that name. First, just use the title of the song, if that's taken, try Title of song (song), before adding in the artist's name. Within the article, also include the album that the song originally appeared on. Including your sources would also be extremely helpful. You must be getting the chart information from somewhere, right? Finally, add infoboxes to your article on singles. It provides nice, quick information to the readers (see Template:Infobox Single). Don't worry, you don't have to fill in all the info, just what you know. Have fun and thanks for contributing. --Wolfer68 (talk) 05:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further advice

[edit]

I'd like to provide some further advice on your creation of number-one R&B and dance song articles.

  1. In the song title's first mention in the article, not only should it be in bold-faced type, it should be in quotations. "Kiddio" instead of Kiddio, for example.
  2. Don't overdo the commas. Most of them are unnecessary as in this sentence you wrote:
    • "Kiddio", also continued Brook Benton's popularity on the pop charts, by making it his fifth, top ten, pop single. Not one comma in that sentence is needed.
  3. Use in-text citations and correct citation style. Instead of a note at the bottom of the article, it is better to cite specifically the sentence being referenced within the article.
    • You would add this <ref>{{cite book |title= Top R&B/Hip-Hop Singles: 1942-2004|last=Whitburn |first=Joel |authorlink=Joel Whitburn |year=2004 |publisher=Record Research |page=54}}</ref>. Put {{reflist}} under the References section and the listing would look like this:
      • Whitburn, Joel (2004). Top R&B/Hip-Hop Singles: 1942-2004. Record Research. p. 54.
  4. When creating a chart positions section, if only listing a few chart titles, there is no need to sort them, since it's all visually in front of you. Use class="wikitable" instead of class="wikitable sortable".
  5. Also in the table, if you are going to pipe the chart name (e.g. [[Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs|Hot Black Singles]]), make sure you use the correct chart name at the time when the single charted. "Hot Black Singles", for example, was the name of the R&B chart from 1982 through 1990, while in the early '60s it was called "Hot R&B Sides". The chronology of the names is listed in the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs article. You can do the same thing in the succession box, too.
  6. The succession boxes should be placed at the end of the article, especially for small articles like yours. The only thing that should be after the succession box is an artist's navigation template (if there is one), the categories, and a stub.
  7. Also, there is no need to wikilink dates. That is a deprecated practice.
  8. Finally, be sure to add a stub at the end of all your articles, since they are never more than a few sentences long. {{R&B-song-stub}} or {{1960s-pop-song-stub}} are a couple of examples to use, depending on the type of song it is, of course, and when it was released.

Feel free to respond on my talk page if you have any questions. Thanks for your contributions and happy editing! --Wolfer68 (talk) 23:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Baby Love (Regina song)

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Baby Love (Regina song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

As is insufficient context

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Passportguy (talk) 18:30, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Separation of different versions of the same song

[edit]

As somebody who is interested in songs you may be interested to know there is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs/coverversions with the purpose of trying to establish a standard rule for merge/separate different versions of the same song. Please make known your feelings on the matter. Regards. Richhoncho (talk) 19:55, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dial My Heart

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dial My Heart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Irbisgreif (talk) 03:30, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Running Away (Roy Ayers song)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Running Away (Roy Ayers song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:01, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

[edit]

Please be sure to add the artist's songs category to all the article stubs you are creating, per WP:SONGS#Categories. For example, the article for the song, "I Love", should have been added to Category:Tom T. Hall songs. Even if the category doesn't exist, it should be added and then it can be created. Thanks. --Wolfer68 (talk) 19:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Succession boxes

[edit]

FYI, there is a current discussion at Wikipedia talk:Record charts#Succession boxes about the need of the succession boxes within song articles. Since you seem to be creating articles for songs that reached number one on various U.S. charts (dance, R&B, country), and include such boxes, you should be prepared to stop the practice. You can continue to add the boxes until consensus is reached and it's put into the guidelines, but you may also want to start including the information you put in the boxes into the prose, which is primarily the date the song reached number one. You may also want to link the chart from within the article as well. A chart section is another possibility. I made such changes to the article you created for "Say You'll Stay Until Tomorrow" as one way of doing it (keeping the succession box for now). --Wolfer68 (talk) 21:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work!

[edit]

Nice work creating the country music single articles. Keep it up. If you need any help, just let me know! HJMitchell You rang? 22:14, 15 December 2009 (UTC) Have this: The Working Man's Barnstar[reply]

The Working Man's Barnstar
For tirelessly creating all those singles articles! HJMitchell You rang? 22:14, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Autoreviewer

[edit]

Hello, nice to meet you! I'm Airplaneman. While patrolling new pages, your 150+ articles frequently stand out as being consistently great in quality. May I suggest getting autoreviewer rights? They will mark your articles automatically patrolled, lessening the load of pages for newpage patrollers. Keep it up! Regards, Airplaneman talk 19:16, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say exactly the same thing. I notice that your edits are almost exclusively to the article space. So, thinking that perhaps messing with wiki-process doesn't interest you, I went ahead and put in the request to have autoreviewer rights assigned to you. Hope you don't mind. It won't really affect anything you do; it is just to save time for other people so they don't have to review your articles at new pages patrol. --RL0919 (talk) 21:02, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tenses

[edit]

Hi - I notice you're creating a lot of song articles which contain phrases like " ... would be her tenth number one on the country chart ..." Please could you write these in the past tense? If it was her tenth number one, then that's a fact, and I think it reads better as eg " ... was her tenth number one on the country chart ..."

Cheers   pablohablo. 09:52, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Carlossfsu! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Aubrey (DJ) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:51, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Succession boxes

[edit]

Please don't put "by [name of artist]" in the middle succession box for #1's. The preceeding and succeeding #1's are supposed to have the artist name, but the middle box should just read "Billboard Hot Country Singles number-one single [date]" and nothing else. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:03, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rodney Crowell - "After All This Time"

[edit]

I noticed that Rodney Crowell's number one hit "After All This Time" is missing from the country singles articles. Can you please make an article for the song and send me a message when you've completed it, thanks. David829 (talk) 18:50, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Ross discography

[edit]

Your edit on this has been reverted, for the time being that is, unless you should get this article properly created and correectly titled. If you want help, just ask. Best, --Discographer (talk) 04:56, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 19:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adult contemporary #1's

[edit]

FYI - I have edited your succession box for the article you created for the song "Navy Blue" from this:

Preceded by
"Java" by Al Hirt
 "Billboard" Easy Listening number-one single by
Diane Renay
March 21, 1964
(one week) 		Succeeded by
"Hello Dolly!" by Louis Armstrong

to this:

Preceded by Billboard Easy Listening number-one single
March 21, 1964 		Succeeded by

Note that I wiki-linked the artists in the songs preceding and succeeding; I removed the artist's name for the song of the article (you only need to put the name when there are multiple hit versions and it needs to be made clear which version; when you need to add whose version, type "(So-and-so version)" not "by So-and-so"; I removed the number of weeks (when more than one week just add a date range based on the issue dates it was at number one); I changed your link for the chart from Hot Adult Contemporary to Adult Contemporary (chart); you don't need to link Billboard within the pipe for the chart; and Billboard should be italicized not within quotation marks. There's really no need for line breaks <br> either.

Also, you continue to use "would be" instead of "was". Instead of saying, "Navy Blue" would be one of two chart hits for Diane Renay", write "Navy Blue" was one of two chart hits for Renay" (you don't have to repeat the artist's full name either). I hope this helps. I'm going to go back and correct all the AC #1's you've already added the succession boxes to. If you can follow this for any more you add in that will be great. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 10:49, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - once again, there is no need to add the artist name within the succession boxes you are adding to articles such as Something Better to Do. The article clearly states it is a song by Olivia Newton-John and no other notable versions are mentioned. I have removed where you put in "by Olivia Newton-John" in the box. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 08:10, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fix your pipes

[edit]

Make sure you pipe links correctly. The name of the article for the Billboard Adult Contemporary chart is Adult Contemporary (chart). You are piping the link backwards - it should be [[Adult Contemporary (chart)|Adult Contemporary]] not [[Hot Adult Contemporary|Adult Contemporary (chart)]]. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 10:44, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not this [[Hot Adult Contemporary|Adult Contemporary]], but this [[Adult Contemporary (chart)|Adult Contemporary]]
Not this [[Adult Contemporary (chart)]], but this [[Adult Contemporary (chart)|Adult Contemporary]]

Please do it right. It's not that hard. You should follow my examples after I corrected some of your earlier edits. Thanks.--Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 01:52, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. –BMRR (talk) 17:40, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Me and You and a Dog Named Boo

[edit]

You didn't need to add the (song) to the title. All you had to do was overwrite the redirect. I've noticed you do this a lot; do you want me to give you instructions on how to overwrite redirects? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:05, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Signed Sealed and Delivered, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dream Lover may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Dream Lover was kept from the number one spot by [[The Battle of New Orleans]] by [[Johnny Horton]]) and went to #1 in UK for four weeks during June and July of 1959 respectively.<ref>[http://www.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:07, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of number-one dance singles of 1988 (U.S.), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In the Name of Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Deeper Love (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Cole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Juliet Roberts may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |year=2004 |publisher=Record Research |page=219}}</ref>, and #44 U.S. [[Billboard Hot 100]]) and the [[house music]] offering, "Caught In The Middle", which also went to number one on the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:35, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alone (Why Must I Be Alone) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Joel Whitburn |year=2004 |publisher=Record Research |page=238}}</ref>, on July 18. "Alone (Why Must I Be Alone" also went to #8 on the [[RPM (magazine)|Canadian singles chart]]. It was the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

I Believe (Sounds of Blackness song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Terry Lewis
Lifted by Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Even Cowgirls Get the Blues
List of number-one dance singles of 1994 (U.S.) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Drunk on Love

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Disrespectful, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terry Lewis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sally, Irene and Mary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sugar daddy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Finally (CeCe Peniston song)#Request for comment

[edit]

You were one of editors of the article. I invite you to an RFC discussion. --George Ho (talk) 19:38, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The link is in the heading; click it. --George Ho (talk) 17:23, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 October 20#File:Peniston Finally CDS.jpg

[edit]

The image that we discussed is nominated for deletion. I invite you to improve consensus. --George Ho (talk) 05:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Just Because (Anita Baker song) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Just Because (Anita Baker song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Songs from the album Giving You the Best That I Got until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. George Ho (talk) 04:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Carlossfsu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Carlossfsu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Time (The Alan Parsons Project song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chilean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Knock Three Times, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thelma Hopkins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Carlossfsu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard chart details in intro paragraphs

[edit]

I think you're putting details about Billboard charts in the introductory paragraph so many articles about songs - I've encountered several on Creedence Clearwater songs. I am reverting the ones on articles I watch because that's unnecessary detail for the opening paragraph. You may want to return those details lower down in the story, if you wish.

As you know, the intro to an article should be quick and concise summary of important information about the article topic. Saying that a song was blocked from #1 by somebody's else's song, with detail and links, is way too cluttered for the intro. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 01:12, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Goodbye Yellow Brick Road (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Top of the World (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of number-one adult contemporary singles of 2019 (U.S.)‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 22:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turn the World Around (Eddy Arnold song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Morgan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cover versions

[edit]

Please read WP:SONGCOVER. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:23, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heading titles

[edit]

Hi, please read MOS:HEADINGS, "section headings should be presented in sentence case"; ie, Chart performance not Chart Performance, Cover versions not Cover Versions. Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Down by the Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Mills.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll change it back without the link.

Secondhandsongs

[edit]

Secondhandsongs fails WP:USERG because people can sign in and change the information. Binksternet (talk) 04:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It should lead you to the link.

Covers & pop culture

[edit]

Hi, I noticed you have added covers and "In popular culture" examples to several articles. Please note these need reliable sources that show that they are noteworthy for inclusion in an encyclopedic article – sources that merely show that they exist are not sufficient to meet WP:SONGCOVER or WP:SONGTRIVIA. Also, WP:NOTRSMUSIC includes a list of sources that are not reliable for WP purposes, such as user-generated sites, like secondhandsongs and discogs. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:05, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this request. Another source you have used, 45cat.com, fails WP:USERG. The Joel Whitburn book you have been using is a great source, but it establishes that the cover exists, and the requirement at WP:SONGCOVER is higher than that. The cover version should be important to the topic. Binksternet (talk) 17:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Two months later and the same problems are continuing: user generated sources, such as Discogs.com, are not considered reliable sources for WP articles and should not be added to articles. Also, covers and appearances in films, etc., need reliable sources that discuss them as somehow noteworthy, not that they just exist. The above links provide more info. —Ojorojo (talk) 14:16, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Again, please do not continue to add user-generated sources, such as 45cat.com, discogs.com, and secondhandsongs.com to articles. These are not considered WP:RELIABLESOURCES (see entries on WP:NOTRSMUSIC). If a song or album is notable, there should be actual reliable sources available. —Ojorojo (talk) 14:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rock-a-Billy (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Top 100.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Misty (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Holmes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Miranda. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

  • Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
  • Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
  • Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
    • Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
  • Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
  • Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. Donald Albury 22:45, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cover songs

[edit]

Thanks for your edits to Wikipedia. Please review WP:COVERSONG before adding cover versions. Merely appearing on an album is not a sufficient reason to add a cover version. I realize that this guideline is often violated, but there's no need to add additional covers that don't meet the inclusion criteria. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 21:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are continuing to do this, Carlos. Please stop. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cover songs again

[edit]

I'm reverting A LOT of the additions you have made that don't meet WP:SONGCOVER and I can see you've been warned about this quite a few times. Please stop. Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm longer using the "song cover" title, rather I know use "other recordings". ccj (talk) 01:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't make any difference at all. "Other recordings" still need to meet WP:SONGCOVER. Frankly, you're spending a lot of time adding information that doesn't meet noteworthiness and will be reverted. Doctorhawkes (talk) 02:10, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And...you're doing it again. Why waste your time adding stuff that will be reverted? Doctorhawkes (talk) 02:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will you also be reverting edits from user:MACWILMSLO, from 2018?? As they remain untouched. ccj (talk) 07:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Doing it again. Please stop. Doctorhawkes (talk) 23:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please refer to the entry, “I Love You, Samantha” ,as only my contributions are reverted and not others, why is that?? ccj (talk) 01:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, I've never edited that page, so it's very hard to know what you're referring to. Secondly, I mostly monitor changes to pages, so it's more likely I'll remove an addition you have made rather than something added five years ago. I have no obligation to remove everything. Doctorhawkes (talk) 03:47, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's seems I'm being singled out. ccj (talk) 04:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You've been warned by four different people and keep doing the same thing. Of course you will get reverted. If it makes you feel any better, you can look at my record and see I've done thousands of songcover reversions.Doctorhawkes (talk) 04:47, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK fine, yes I've been warned but I've also been thanked by other posters. Just a big fan of pop culture, and don't want to see it, forgotten. ccj (talk) 06:46, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of It's Been So Long for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article It's Been So Long is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's Been So Long until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 20:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Carlossfsu&oldid=1246414772"