User talk:C.Fred/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions about User:C.Fred. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10

Quebec Green Party

I wanted to give the guy the benefit of the doubt. So I did a massive search, and didn't find anything. GreenJoe 02:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Block this user

User talk:Escortoffer evidently reveals spamming. thanks Roadrunnerz45 ^{(talk 2 me)} 12:39, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Help with Pau Gasol page

I'm having some trouble with some editing, While I was gone, people were changing it, and it didn't help it to what I had improved on it. If you can take a look and let me know if this is vandilism and if it can be dealt with, I'd be much appreciated. Gamloverks (talk) 00:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Never mind, just monitor the page please... Gamloverks (talk) 01:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crunk Club

Good call adding the other article, I should have spotted that. Guest9999 (talk) 01:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

888 Holdings

OK. Noted. But many thanks for your help anyway. Dormskirk (talk) 21:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Arumugam

Articles about future films with unclear or insufficient notability may be challenged at WP:AFD. If you want it restored, I'll do it, but that's the likely response. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 17:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Such an article would undoubtedly be challenged as a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. WP:SNOW suggests we let it stay dead, unless the creator or another user objects. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 21:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Hdayejr?

No, I'm on the other side. I'm the one who's trying to STOP him from destroying Wikipedia. Check the logs again.69.132.26.177 (talk) 01:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC

Thank you. 69.132.26.177 (talk) 01:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

The paragraph about the Ohio Revised Codes? It's a long story with implications IRL, not just threatening violence against another Wikipedia user. 69.132.26.177 (talk) 01:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't know him IRL. I just know how much damage he's done to Wikipedia. He is NOT some kind of innocent victim here. He's a sockpuppet of a multiply banned user. 69.132.26.177 (talk) 02:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

If you're interested, feel free to read/comment at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Leon harrison and 69.132.26.177. – Luna Santin (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I've left a comment there. Thank you. 69.132.26.177 (talk) 17:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

AIV

I saw that you closed the AIV report for User:Mattbroon. I don't have a problem with it as such but I thought that your edit summary was a bit strange: "3h since last edit, edits appear good faith". No questions about the 3h since last edit part, but could you seriously argue that these edits were in good faith: [1] and [2]? Prodding a prominent British politician Neil Kinnock for deletion with the reason given as "It appears to be a commercial exercise and has no part to play in an Encyclopedia" and then manually forging the time stamp on the prod to make it appear that the prod has expired. That is pretty far away from good faith, isn't it? Nsk92 (talk) 19:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Nsk92 (talk) 20:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Supernatural

Hey, don't know if you remember, but you previously helped out on the Supernatural page with the person who kept removing the people from the Stars list. Now that the season is over, he or she is back at it, despite all attempts for logical compromises. I was wondering if you could give your assistance again?

ThanksOphois (talk) 22:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

A couple of things, forum shopping is generally considered bad, things like this belong on WP:AN/3RR, not on an admins talk page soliciting assistance. Further, WP:3RR is explicit in enforcement:

In the cases where multiple editors violate the rule, administrators should treat all sides equally.
— Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule#Enforcement

Please use care when issuing blocks in the future. —Locke Cole • t • c 08:36, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

I noticed this as well. Report filed here, where I noted that you (C.Fred) also carried out one of the reverts. See here. The timing of this was the same (either just before or just after) your block of the IP editor for 3RR. Please do not get involved in the edit war when giving blocks for 3RR. I've also reviewed the edit history of the article, and it appears you are actively editing the article. Please report content disputes for other to deal with in future. Carcharoth (talk) 10:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Dead link used as citation

I don't think that posting a dead link (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,265374,00.htm) as a source does much to 'prove' a point. Are you arguing that Crystal Gail Mangum was not a prostitute? Duke53 | ^Talk 03:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

This is a quote from that link: "She was adamant that she never worked as a prostitute, and told police that in only one instance did she have sex with a customer, a man she thought was "nice."" She admitted to having sex with a customer so that makes her a prostitute, unless you know of some minimum number of times having sex with a customer someone has have to qualify as a prostitute. Duke53 | ^Talk 06:48, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Definitions of prostitute:

a woman who engages in sexual intercourse for money; sell one's body; exchange sex for money

wordnet.:princeton.edu/perl/webwn

Prostitution describes the act of sexual intercourse in exchange for money. However, its definition may be extended loosely to include any sexual act for any type of compensation; depending on the location where the act occurs. ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitute Duke53 | ^Talk 06:48, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Need your help

In relation to this page here, this one here and the correct article here. I think theres a prob with the re-directs and capitalization. Someone just made a re-direct, i left a message on their page but they haven't replied. Im assuming it was good faith. Thanks Roadrunnerz45 ^{(talk 2 me)} 06:28, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

block of IP re Supernatural (TV series)

I believe that this IP is the same person as Bcute12 - Revolving Bugbear 14:36, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

FYI

From WP:BLANKING: Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages. IP users may remove comments from their own talk page. Doing so is allowed, and should not be reverted. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 23:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Spartak!

Regarding references for the Spartak! entry, I have added playlist entries to show regular national radio play promotion, evidence of tour posters, and further connections to other artists. The press quote (Diario De Noticias) is from a national newspaper. There are now references to other news sources (other than Blogger). The Portuguese media space is exceedingly small compared to the UK or the USA, and that could account for limited online press articles, although I believe the radio play and live show evidence is very robust proof of an active band. Blogs like A Trompa, Sound + Vision and Planeta Pop are widely read and quoted, and archived... your further comments appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Altlusa (talk • contribs) 12:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

User:WidgetWorld

Hi. Looks like I missed you on AIV by about two minutes; hope you're still online. User:WidgetWorld is a clear-cut spam account who's also doing the sockpuppet thing. Can you please take a look? Thanks! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Halo 3 Talk

hi, i need the page to be simi-protected because people are removing perfect edits.

Mjriley933 (talk) 22:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)mjriley933

My talk page

Thank you for letting me know about my talk page. Unbeknownst to me, another admin had redirected my talk page from my old user name, which had been a protected redlink, to my current username. That had the unintended side effect of protecting my current talk page. I appreciate you pointing it out so that I could fix the problem. --B (talk) 05:02, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Justification of Notable Musicianship

Can I inquire what equates to a notable musician- especially noting the unsigned thread above, and as all external links and photographs are genuine. Are tour dates required, or quotes? User:perpetualvamp —Preceding comment was added at 00:44, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandal returns

That vandal you blocked for vandalizing my userpage is at it again. bahamut0013 ♠♣ 11:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: User:Damienfranco

Sorry for not reply you before. Definitively, Damienfranco was a vandal... everything that he had on his userpage was only a lot of bad words and insults. Thank you for blocking his account!! Take care!! --Snakeyes _talk ^{find me @ es:wiki}

My email

Hey, I was doing some housekeeping (for various reasons), but I Googled my email and the only place with it in the entire internet was your archive page. I bleeped it out for my own security. Just a heads up that I edited it. I apologize if you mind. --MPD^{T / C} 23:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Doctor Steel Deletion

In my opinion, the speedy delete was without due process. I had worked hard on making an unbiased article without the problems of the version that was deleted, and it was deleted without so much as a vote or a notification on my end to allow me to save my progress or even be aware of any issues. I only learned about it because it was on my watchlist. Coolgamer (talk) 17:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

eClerx references

Hi, needed a clarification on 1) For which parts of the article references are needed? 2) What sources are considered good references so i can list only those Gingercindy (talk) 16:39, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

eClerx references

ok thanks, I just added a reference from BSE India for revenue and Moneycontrol.com for the Igentica acquisition, so of the 4 references listed all 4 are from independent sources. Does this work? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gingercindy (talk • contribs) 16:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

eNom

Hi C.Fred, would you take a look at eNom "Accreditations and awards" section? "Drive-by" editor (good faith, but infrequent contributor with thin editing history) put a neutrality flag on the article, which has led to dispute over whether accreditations and awards -- even reliably sourced -- are appropriate content in articles. Would appreciate your experienced opinion on whether section -- as-is or modified -- is appropriate content, and would appreciate your removal of neutrality flag if and when you think it's warranted. Thirdbeach (talk) 17:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

C.Fred, Thirdbeach is having a huff because they're an eNom employee (employed by Demand Media if you check the user's original IP address) and is engaged in a cleanup campaign. As Scosco62 stated it reads like sales or promotional material, including in the past PRNEWS links and other such nonsense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.150.252.31 (talk • contribs) 03:19, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, C.Fred. Appreciate the voice of experience. Thirdbeach (talk) 20:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Dart88

Hi Fred, i recently updated a page : Pematangsiantar, and I was surprised to see the page is deleted because i copy-paste the text from another page. The thing is, i was trying to delete a page called "Pematang Siantar", and replace it with the correct one (Pematangsiantar). Is there any way for me to do that without typing the whole content? Thanks, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dart88 (talk • contribs) 04:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Memo to myself

Don't forget that autocomplete of edit summaries can have a mind of its own. This is especially troublesome when a long descriptive summary starts the same as the short one you want to use. Pause, check for autocomplete, then Control-S. —C.Fred (talk) 06:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Review of Marina V Listing Re-instatement

Fred, I was instructed by editor John, who rendered the "keep" verdict to place a request for reinstatement review at the Marina V listing, and per his instructions, I am doing once again, so please do NOT remove, for the reasons, as follows:

Wikipedia has eliminated THOUSANDS upon THOUSANDS of unsigned artists whose qualifications equal or surpass Marina V for true notablility. For example, recently Justin Lanning was removed from Wikipedia, yet he had CD's selling throughout retail bricks&mortar chains, a billboard on Sunset Boulevard, far more youtube videos and hits per video, higher sales ranking on Amazon by far, airplay on mainstream radio stations, whereas Marina V only has internet radio airplay. How can you claim Marina V notability exceeds somebody like Justin Lanning? I am not making a case that Justin Lanning be reinstated because I agree with his removal from Wikipedia, he was more notable, not sufficiently notable. I am simply saying that you must be consistent in Wikipedia decisions and Marina V fails notability in virtually every aspect. Let me restate one last time: super low Amazon sales, ultra low youtube hits, no FM radio play, only internet radio play, limited local/college media coverage (that's NOT notable, most unsigned artists obtain niche coverage like her), only coffeehouse performances, no concert halls, no national media coverage. She is no different (and no worse) than the typical relatively anonymous unsigned artist, most of whom will be throwing in the towel by age 30, but Wikipedia has removed so many unsigned artists who are at her level or better, so it begs the question whether or not she has a special relationship with a wiki editor who is somehow keeping her listed even while so many others are removed? I argue for Wiki consistency and your decision undermines that consistency entirely. Your decision would require reinstatement of HUNDREDS of unsigned music artists who were deleted over the past few years and it makes NO sense at all, since to reiterate one last time, listing of unsigned artists with primarily only an internet presence VIOLATES all Wiki notability requirements. Thank you for your kind attention, Fred.

!MusicBizLady

Fred, my sweet, I've never done this before, so not really sure what to do and I do NOT want to mess up that page and get you angry with me. Please either open it up yourself and copy/paste my comments or instruct me more in detail what to do . My main concern is that I do NOT want to disrupt the page in question. Thanks.

!MusicBizLady

Fred, my love, I realize that there are grey areas in terms of notability but I guess my argument is based primarly upon the concept of CONSISTENCY. You cannot have Wikipedia eliminate one kind of unsigned artist in favor of another kind, when both lack the kind of notability that transcends an internet presence. Marina V has not even managed to make an appearance on a local TALK TV show, from what I can gather. Just how notable can that be? The fact that her only notable articles appear in CHICAGO journals is not impressive because most unsigned artists can obtain (at least) coverage from their hometowns, that is typical in unsigned artist circles. So eliminate the CHICAGO media, and her coverage is truly limited. Again, it all comes down to this: reinstate somebody like Marina V and open Wikipedia up to all kinds of appeals from delisted unsigned artists who are no less notable than her.

!MusicBizLady

One last point, Fred, my dear. I urge all Wiki editors to re-read the decisions rendered with respect to other unsigned music artist deletions. In most cases, it came down to only five major empirical criteria: Amazon sales rank (Marina V fails), YouTube activity (Marina V fails), National Media coverage (Marina V fails), FM radio play (Marina V fails), MySpace fans (Marina V passes (but she apparently first registered on MySpace in 2004 long before MySpace instituted passwords designed to thwart for-hire computer BOT programs which randomly and speedily amassed thousands of fans for unsigned artists). Personally, I have no issue with maintaining her listing forever, she seems to be a sweet girl, but from the perspective of protecting Wikipedia's integrity, I honestly believe you open up a can of worms with HUNDREDS, if not THOUSANDS, of other unsigned artists (who have been deleted previously) if you allow less than notables to remain listed. Thanks Fred.

!MusicBizLady

OK, Fred, dear, I think I figured out to to do that Deletion Review thingie, hope I did it right?????

!MusicBizLady

eClerx references

Fred, did you get a chance to review the new references i added to the eClerx page? please let me know what else needs to be done to remove the References and Citations message. Gingercindy (talk) 03:57, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Serene kelly

i made a page about a fashion designer and it got deleted...WHY? her name is serene kelly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lupebaby (talk • contribs) 04:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

West Runs Expwy

Is this possible that I-268 will ever be designate. it seems to a doubt to me, and I never been to West Virginia, so I'm not quite clear about that issue. I been to Wash, DC, and thats 3 years ago.--Freewayguy ^{Talk Contribs} 02:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Salting of Lard land

Feel free to unsalt Lard land if it is helping you identify the socks. I just thought that six recreations by five different "new accounts" in less than an hour was a trend that needed to be altered. --Allen3 ^talk 01:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

It looks like Mardland may be the new Land land. --Allen3 ^talk 02:22, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Request to re-block vandal user/s

Greetings C.Fred. Back in February you stuck a 3-month block on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:70.138.106.139. No sooner had said block expired than the user/s were back to vandalising articles, the latest (as of today) being Hugh McDonald (musician) - again. Could you please do whatever you can to solve this? Thank you,--Technopat (talk) 20:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

WP:AIV

Grkovidb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Loganlion12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Greetings. Just trying to understand why you said Badreport/ Insufficient Warning for the above. Just to correct my ignorance -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 05:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

OK ! Thanks for your immediate reply. I got the point. Have a gr8 day ! -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 05:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Your block was overturned

It was way out of line. Not agreeing with an edit is not a valid reason to block someone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.110.232.223 (talk) 15:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for outing yourself as having conducted this edit war for over a week. I've blocked the address you used today not only for WP:3RR and WP:NPA, but also under WP:SOCK. —C.Fred (talk) 16:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Dominic Huey deletion re: Landfall

You asked what was Landfall and its relevance to notability, Landfall is New Zealand's foremost and longest-running arts and literary journal. It showcases new fiction and poetry, as well as biographical and critical essays, and cultural commentary. http://www.otago.ac.nz/press/landfall/index.html. Inclusion in this journal does have relevance and is part of legitimate notability for a performance poet. i had not even finished referencing this beefore it was deleted.. I don't understand this at all. --Literartist (talk) 23:03, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Christina King

I am not sure why this would be deleted since Jason Evert, Christopher Cuddy, Jimmy Aiken, Karl Keating etc... do and are the same thing. As a national speaker, writer, radio personality, columnist for several newspapers as well as having several DVD's used in both public and private schools to teach abstinence, I am not sure why this information is not relevant. I request this page be made or reposted. Oesterreich2733 (talk) 00:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Zachary Jaydon

I agree that it is probably a hoax, but is there any chance you could visit a library and validate those sources that Tragedy Stryker is quoting? I live on a Dutch-speaking island in South America, so my library doesn't have access to Disney Channel magazines. That way, we could settle it. As it is, we have a hard time keeping the name out when someone says they have a source.Kww (talk) 03:37, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

FYI 3RR report filed Kww (talk) 20:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Same problem is occurring in the Zachary Jaydon article.Kww (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Zachary Jaydon

There seems to be confusion as to the relation between Jaydon D. Paull & Zachary Jaydon. They are one in the same. A large percentage of performers/artists don't go by their legal name. Any notability no matter which of the two names they are credited under are still assertions of nobility under either or both. Many people are eliminating anything that can be user uploaded or changed. I agree with the principle of this in general, however, videos, magazine scans and the such are irrefutable proof of events or facts no matter where they came from. If there is a video of Mr. Jaydon playing with a National Rock Band, you can't say that because it was put up by a "user" that the fact doesn't remain.

While every sentence of this Wiki Article isn't strongly sourced, it doesn't mean he doesn't meat notability requirements for an article. I have scanned and uploaded quite a few of my sources at: http://zacharyjaydonwiki.blogspot.com/

Also, the following was taken directly from WP:N#MUSIC:

Criteria for composers and lyricists

For composers, songwriters, librettists or lyricists:

  1. Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition.

Jaydon has written material on several Multi-Platinum records, including *NSYNC, Craig David, Ryan Cabrera and others. These WERE songs that were included on these albums. They weren't scrapped, or obscure B-Sides. These were songs included on official releases by MAJOR artists. He obviously has notable talent if these artists are choosing to work with him. This is obviously an arguable issue, but given the success of the albums his work has been featured on, it seems at the VERY least, notable. These credits are easily verifiable here:

([3], [4], [5])

The 3 above sources are all from www.ASCAP.com which is one of the most trusted sources used on Wiki for Songwriter Credit Verification.

([6]) also shows from a VERY large, Fortune 500 companies website with information on Close To Home and confirming Mr. Jaydon's Songwriting Credits. This website would be considered reliable on any front, and also independent of the subject himself.

Skyler Morgan (talk) 22:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Help

Hi, I want to upload this image. But facing problem while uploading. Can you please what is the problem in [7]. I am receiving a message upload error. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I will use the image as non-free historic image for the article Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany. I filled the below form:

This image is a faithful digitisation of a unique historic image, and the copyright for it is most likely held by the person who created the image or the agency employing the person. It is believed that the use of this image may qualify as non-free use under the Copyright law of the United States. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information.

Please remember that the non-free content criteria require that non-free images on Wikipedia must not "[be] used in a manner that is likely to replace the original market role of the original copyrighted media." Use of historic images from press agencies must only be of a transformative nature, when the image itself is the subject of commentary rather than the event it depicts (which is the original market role, and is not allowed per policy). Fair use

To the uploader:

Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.
For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples.
Template:Non-free use rationale 2 may be helpful for stating the rationale.

To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

If this tag does not accurately describe this image, please replace it with an appropriate one.

Non-free media information and use rationale true for Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany
Description	Cover page of Reine Luft
Source	The anti-tobacco campaign of the Nazis: a little known aspect of public health in Germany, 1933-45 - article published in the British medical Journal
Article	Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany
Portion used	Entire picture
Low resolution?	Yes, enough to illustrate subject.
Purpose of use	to illustrate the article on German government policies against smoking during the Nazi era
Replaceable?	yes, if a PD equivalent ad can be found
Other information	possibly PD because of age. Needs to be checked.
Fair useFair use of copyrighted material in the context of Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:C.Fred/Archive_3true

But this is not working. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 17:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Scott Shefler

Abt Electronics is a relevant topic. It provides information of the nation's largest independent retailer in the country. It is a valuable source of information to make the public aware of its presence. Their efforts on reducing energy and waste are relevant information about the company. Their store features are like none other in the nation and this post gives people the knowledge of its existence. If this post was deleted why isn't Best Buy or Circuit City deleted? Shefler2 (talk) 17:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Doug Heckman page

Fred, Thanks for all the clean up you did. I have a question about the picture on the upper right of the page. It is a photo that Doug Heckman (who I know personally) took and I'm certain he would want it on the page. What do I need to do to remove the picture from its "speedy deletion" candidacy?

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barry slaff (talk • contribs) 17:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Marina V and Elly K reinstatments

Yes, sorry, Fred, darling-poo, I had to travel out of country, just returned, but the entire issue you raised was answered in my discussion with Stifles

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MusicBizLady

MusicBizLady (nowiki) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MusicBizLady (talk • contribs) 19:31, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

cherokee ancestry

how is sourced content a music article?

re: tori amos & cherokee ancestry

this is a woman who, from 1991-2008, has changed her ancestral story so many times. it is traceable, that, with the growth of the internet and the ability to verify truths, her bloodline went from half-to-a quarter- to now, a great-great-great grandmother. she is not of cherokee ancestry. she appropriates this culture for its otherness, to make her connection to America as an idea more cemented. she debases the culture and traditions, characterizes the people as one with the land, refuses the people a real identity.

this would be acceptable, were it not, on the one hand, for the american people's refusal to acknowledge what they have done to the aboriginal.

what she has done, and what wikipedia will allow to continue, is the appropriation and mitigation of the native american culture and tradition and bloodline.

there is no evidence, except for what she states. the story has changed repeatedly since the early 1990s; it has changed with the growth of the internet as being able to research verifiably into someone's past.

moreover, it is the way in which she alleges her cherokee blood; she uses the sufferings of the native american to compare with her 'sufferings' and 'oppression' as a white woman.

it is insensitive. it is racist. it is unsettling that this is allowed to continue.

there is nothing legitimate about the sources stated to back up the claim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chess queen101 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

As was noted at Talk:Cherokee, nothing has been presented to disprove the two magazine articles. Further discussion should go there. —C.Fred (talk) 23:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Scott Shefler

The sources at the end of the page, although appear to be from Abt's website are actually secondary sources. They are just pulled articles from various sources on the subject matter that are located on Abt's website. If this is still not sufficient then please let me know and I will try to find the actual sources of the news articles/awards. Shefler2 (talk) 01:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

My article was deleted (every Spongebob) and I need to know why Spongebob543 (talk) 02:07, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Doug Heckman photo

Fred,

Since you edited the Doug Heckman page, I thought I'd direct this question to you. The photo (upper right) is designated as a candidate for "speedy deletion," but Doug told me he has no problem releasing it into the public domain; how do I edit the photo information so it is in the public domain and is no longer at risk of being deleted?

Thanks, Barry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.33.164.59 (talk) 02:29, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

The photo is already noted as being in the public domain at the Commons. —C.Fred (talk) 02:40, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Help

How can I post a artical as a stub?--C.R.Stinnett (talk) 03:05, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

nethermind, someone just told me--C.R.Stinnett (talk) 04:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

The clown statue

I might of misunderstood, but you said that clown statue did not contain any noticable resources. I did, infact, say that it could be source for coulrophobia in some people and that it is told on some web-sites. Like I said, I could of just misunderstood.--C.R.Stinnett (talk) 04:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Scientists, academics, economists, professors, authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers, and other creative professionals:

The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique. The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums, or had works in many significant libraries. See Wikipedia:Notability (academics) for guidelines on academics —Preceding unsigned comment added by Techjcg (talk • contribs) 05:48, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

And how does that apply to a work of fiction? —C.Fred (talk) 16:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

ATA Virtual Deleted

I started an article about ATAVirtual, but it was deleted before I could really get anything onto it. Could we please have a little more time to add to it? ATAVirtual (talk) 23:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

I noticed the message you recently left to User talk:Evan210. Please remember: do not bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. Deadly∀ssassin 22:05, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Opposing viewpoint: You are being quite nice to that guy who created the hoax, nicer than I was. I shouldn't be editing today since I'm not in the best of moods. Thanks for inadvertently knocking some sense back into my noggin. Have a cookie, Fred. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

PMDrive1061 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Not at all. My central air at home went out...and I live in the desert. Been staying with my folks the last couple of days. It is a whopping 118 degrees here in Palm Springs. Or, if you will, 48C. At least it's a dry heat, as we're fond of quipping out here. That and the compressor is under warranty. Unfortunately, the labor is not. Taking a serious chunk out of the pocketbook. So, now ya know. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Went in today and it was up over 100 inside according to the two-digit digital thermometer on the thermostat. It read "00" and later "01." The tech is cutting me a break on the labor cost and working with me on paying him for it. The doggoned compressor would have been north of $1600 if I had to buy it. Big ouch. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Joe Montana

Hello Fred ! I added a new person named Joe Montana (musician). Could you link these 3 Joe Montana's properly now, so that they are visible when it comes down to their name ? -- Prunk (talk) 11:59, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Ok , I see that you sorted it, thank you ! -- Prunk (talk) 12:02, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the assist

Thanks for reverting the un-archive of Talk:Ford FE engine, and for handling the spurious vandalism report. The IP editor you reverted (and whose AIV report you cancelled) has been a real problem-child type for quite awhile. I and others have put considerable time and effort into explaining how we do things on Wikipedia to him/her, with many links to the relevant policies, protocols, essays, etc., all to no avail. S/he seems bound and determined to feel persecuted and make trouble. I wish there were an effective way to proactively limit the damage and mayhem people like this cause, particularly where it is reasonably apparent that the editor is avoiding registering in order to circumvent enforcement of the rules. Oh well...I guess all we can do in response to persistent mess-makers is to keep on moppin' up their messes! Thanks again. —Scheinwerfermann (talk) 00:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: iPod touch Fans

Thanks for your help and suggestions with this section. Luckily, I saved the wiki text of the article I was working on so I'l work on it on my user page, as you suggested. How will I be able to get it moved over later? Cruelio1998 (talk) 06:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Question

This is User:Tm93. I had recently tagged Shaka Laka Boom Boom (Indian Drama serial) for deltion. I know that I forgot to put a reason, but User:Umerfhussain (the creator) removed the tag himself. I'm not an admin, but you are; therefore I'm asking for your counsel. Only admins are allowed to remove the tag. It no longer is too much of problem now that RHaworth has nominated it, for the reason I meant to write, but that's not my point. I just wish that User:Umerfhussain be notified that only admins are allowed to remove tags. He removed it himself and he is the creator. Click here to see the history for the page. He/she might create another article that does need to be deleted, it gets tagged, he/she removes the tag, no article is deleted. I love to see wikipedia grow, I just think that it should be done by the rules.

P.S. I'm really not trying to be rude, but User:Umerfhussain needs to be notified.

—Tm93 (talk) 08:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank You for the templates. I didn't know the template for warning other users. Thank You for that info. Question. How come on the page's history it doesn't show that I proposed it for deletion? If I could see an older verision of that page then I could see how my reson was not rationale. I would like to be an every now and then new page patroller. To do this properly I need to learn from my mistakes.Tm93 (talk) 19:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

An IP you blocked has returned

Hello. I have noticed an IP with a dubious history adding false info into numerous pages. A hard one to catch since occasionally the edits seem valid. But those are rare. See User:70.138.106.139. The last block issued (and there have been a few) came from you. Just wondering if you had time to re-visit and perhaps weigh-in a heftier vacation for this troublesome anon. Thanks, cheers and take care! Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 22:43, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for Help with Gabriel Murphy Article

Hello C.Fred- thanks for the help with the Gabriel Murphy article. I would like to suggest that you remove the protection status from Gabriel Murphy and allow me the opportunity to expand on the article, this will also allow those who want to have input on the current Deletion Review to be able to see the article so they can render an informed opinion. Lastly, putting the reidrect aside, I would hope you would agree that the article does establish notability on its own and does not need to have a redirect to the aplus article. THanks for your time and consideration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LakeBoater (talk • contribs) 18:41, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I added the requested clarification on the Deletion Review. LakeBoater (talk) 20:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello C.Fred- thanks much for your comments and direction on the Gabriel Murphy article including your suggestions on re-writing the article. I have taken a considerable amount of time to make sure everything I possibly can is cited by independent sources. I now have 42 total references and I think over a dozen different sources. I would like to take you up on your invitation to review the article before opening a deletion review. If you can review it and leave me a message with your thoughts as to whether you feel it is solid and therefore we can go ahead and open a deletion review (I will take you up on your offer to open a deletion discussion). Thanks again so much for your help.

The article is located at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:LakeBoater/Gabriel_Murphy LakeBoater (talk) 06:12, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi C.Fred- did you get a chance to review the new Gabriel Murphy article? Thanks! :) LakeBoater (talk) 04:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello C.Fred- I thought I would ping you again and see if you could take a look at the new Gabriel Murphy article. I have not heard from you in several days. Hope everything is OK. LakeBoater (talk) 22:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Amalgam Digital

hey i got your email about the Speedy Deletion. im new to all this so i was wondering if and how i go about the process to resubmit but with the valid citations needed to add the page. thanks again for keeping me informed. Amaldigi (talk) 19:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Permissions for image?

Greetings! I saw that you uploaded Image:KinniRamp.JPG, noting that it's under the Creative Commons license and authored by the AZ Fish and Wildlife department. How did you get this image from them, and how can we see that they have released the image under CC? —C.Fred (talk) 17:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

C.Fred, Thank you for your note. I am a contractor with AZGFD and have been requested to add the images to the wiki pages and create the pages if they aren't already there. We were all confounded as to how to CC the images, so any and all help you can provide would be great, we can then go back and fix if needed. Thanks, MJonesAz (talk) 17:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

So, in speaking with the AZGFD folks, these images are so granular and small (sized for web use) that they can be placed under a GDFL. Again if there is something else needed to be done to have these images pass, please let me know. MJonesAz (talk) 18:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Permission to Proceed

I'm confused. I've been flagged twice in the five minutes I've been on wikipedia trying to create a page. You claim that you don't know Brian Celio. Do you know every author in the world? Furthermore, he DOES have verifiable sources but you haven't gave me the chance to post them. Also, I AM a neutral source. I was contracted to interview the author and create the page. I did not know the author beforehand. Lastly, he is a published author and deserves to be on here just as much as any other author. I'm not sure who gave you the authority to make such rash and arbitrary decisions but I can promise that wikipedia will be contacted by lawyers for unfair discrimination and unwarranted deletions by its supervisors if I'm not given the chance to create a page for him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Exilepublishing (talk • contribs) 04:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Garrett Moore inquiry

Hello! In regard to your inquiry on my Talk Page: "What do you see as the assertion of notability in the Garrett Moore article? Even though I pulled the speedy tag at first, I'm no longer convinced there is an assertion of significance or importance." To answer the question: I don't understand your question. I am the lad who put the article up for Speedy Delete (which you denied) and then put it up for AfD (which you speedy deleted). I saw absolutely no assertion of notability, which is why I was trying to get the article erased. Not to be a braggart, but I think my initial call was correct. Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 12:10, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Your message

I normally edit as various dynamic IPs, and have been not been involved in the Bardcom situation to date but I have seen it unfold. As the requests for arbitration page is semi-protected and cannot be edited by IP editors I realised an account may be needed if the removal of British Isles when sourced and correct continues. You are welcome to check the edits and sources for yourself. I hope you will be displaying your vim and vigour at Bardcom's page too at him saying this edit was vandalism. Check on Google Books, I did and both books say British Isles. EmpireForever (talk) 01:00, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Comment There have been ongoing incivility issues related specifically to anon IP addresses and this article. There have also been a number of anon IP editors blocked in the past for ad hominen attacks on me. This user admits to using anon IP accounts, and this comment here is grossly insulting. I have no evidence of a link, but I am concerned that this user has specifically created an account to attack my edits. I also have no idea why the editor has turned to you specifically for asssistence. Perhaps a checkuser would reveal a possible link? Advice welcomed. --Bardcom (talk) 13:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

The Darker Image

Thanks for your assistance in editing this article and change of recommendation to "keep." Greatly appreciated. PutneySwope1 (talk) 04:21, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Could you please this image because it was copied from another website. Thanks. --Amazonien (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

name ok?

You blocked User:Poland shall rule europe. Is this name ok? I am not the same person as that other user but I like Poland. Poland rules the area east of Germany (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Vandal at Linnaean Taxonomy

Suggest you check this page. User Consist is inserting grossly POV comments as he did at Cladistics. I opted to just inform somebody who can block or ban, rather than rv and no doubt start him off on another edit war. Same goes for his latest vandalism at PhyloCode page. He obviously can't grasp the difference between a research paper and an encyclopedia. JCHall (talk) 15:14, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

DNA Baser

Hello, I just saw your reference tags on this article. I just put in a page protection request, as attempts are being made to dislodge it from the AfD process. If you can protect page, it would be appreciated. Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 18:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Very good. Thanks for the speedy reply. Be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

To clarify -- I was asking to protect the article, not the AfD page. But knowing you are watching it is fine with me. Thanks again. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, they are aware of what happened, since I added the link of the disruption to the AfD discussion. We shall see what transpires. I appreciate your input.

Ecoleetage (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, and remember: "All men are created equal, but ambition, or lack of it, soon separates them."Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

P.S. I see you blocked that vandal who was mucking up the AfD page. Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 22:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Survivor: Fiji Fanfic

The article was created to archive a fanfiction story written by a user named Guatemalafanfic at Survivor Sucks. A few other of his stories have been archived and I figured I would create one also. Note that it has absolutely nothing to do with the outcome of the actual season of Survivor.

Your message: Greetings! It looks the article you created at Survivor: Fiji Fanfic is a close duplicate of the content at Survivor: Fiji. Please explain what the purpose of this article is, as it currently seems redundant, and the title suggests that any additions will be original research. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Mikebloom819 (talk) 03:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

User talk:71.75.8.12

Just wanted to give you a thanks for patrolling the Wikipedia waters with me.mboverload @ 03:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

If you have IRC I'm on #wikipedia =D mboverload @ 04:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Bliss

I do not understand why you have deleted this article as I have included external links to prove he is a real person, and has released a mixtape and is intending to release an album.

He is in the public eye in North London and so is a notable person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TWoods10 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Could you please inform me of what should be done to demonstrate the subjects notabilityTWoods10 (talk) 14:05, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Headstrong (album)

You seem to monitor and take care of a lot of the same mouseketeer articles that I do. I'm getting frustrated by the mess over at Ashley Tisdale, with this long-running edit war, and am trying to sort out the players. It's pretty clear that the 190.*.*.* edits are all one editor. He is a sock for somebody, and the candidates are Voices4ever and Triping.
On the other side, I'm clearly an editor (at least I'm clear to me, YMMV), and Gimmetrow seems to probably be an individual editor. Over at Be Good to Me, 86.135.133.84 gets into the act of reverting the unsourced additions, and is supported pretty strongly by Neon White and Peyton Waldorf., but I suspect that 86.135.133.84 is a sock for somebody. At Ashley Tisdale discography, 86.141.12.33 pops up to try to get the unsourced information out, and he is probably the same as 86.135.133.84. What's your opinion? Sooner or later, we need to start blocking people for 3RR violations, and I would like a second opinion on who is a sock of who, if anyone is socking. I've never seen something go on this long without socks showing up, but maybe I'm just old and suspicious.
Kww (talk) 23:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Liferay

I found last year discussion about Liferay page removal (due to word-to-word copy from their public website)... in your comment you compare it with Windows Vista. My opinion: "Encyclopedic content" should have some meaning, and Wikipedia should OR should not publish article on Opteron 2350 etc... We need to define stricter rules. Liferay is open-source product, and Windows Vista is copyrighted. Just as a sample of common sense, article on Potato (another product) is really useful. Funtick (talk) 21:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry...

All this anger directed towards you... Next time you should tell them that I was the one to revert, all you did was protect the page... although I doubt the block will stop him/her/it, as they have switched IPs quickly in the past to continue with the Darren Stevens edits... - Adolphus79 (talk) 03:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD's

If I may make a respectful suggestion you'll find closing AfDs faster and easier if you use this script.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Of course! It's good habit for an admin to give a nice long thorough reason when closing an AfD as delete. And your welcome on the script. --Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Mark Gastineau

Please give me a hand in entering the information regarding his daughter and wife into his article. I thought that seeing as how is relationship/affair with Bridgitte Nelson was in the beginning of the article it would go there but it seems I am wrong. Missjessica254 (talk) 16:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Topk

For what it's worth, I've reviewed Topk's edit history and I think I know what their comments were about — I previously reverted some inappropriate contributions they made to our articles on Beverly Thomson and Pauline Marois. I'd forgotten that they were involved in that. Not that it justifies the attack edit or anything, but at least I know where it's coming from now. Bearcat (talk) 17:06, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

beware! spybot is watching you!

Beware SineBot is still watching you and signing your comments. Do you know the reason why Spybot is sanctioned by the project and nobody is allowed to ban it due to disruptive behavior? Because wikipedia arbitrators, like Cardinal Richelieu, have the following quote in the back of their head. "If you give us six lines written by the most honest man, we will find something in them to hang him." . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.210.165.237 (talk) 23:36, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Move over redirect

Ah HA! An admin! Can you do a mover over a redirect? I don't want to mess up the history. I wanted to move Gliese 581 c to Gliese 581c (no space between 581 and c) to match the naming convention of other planets (Gliese 581b, Gliese 581d). I don't see any controversy. --Elliskev 01:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Done. It didn't look controversial to me, either. —C.Fred (talk) 01:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Great. Thanks! --Elliskev 01:54, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

I couldn't work out whether any consensus for a move for Gliese 581c had been reached. I had earlier posted this comment (not an oppose, but not a support either). I posted this to try to gather some kind of feedback. I am now somewhat concerned some kind of precedence is being used without consensus. Maybe I should have posted a "Wait for more discussion" comment? Ah wait, I see there's been some Talk page edit warring going on since I posted. You may have seen the page after my comment was moved and edited without my Ok. Too much heat, too little light, I find. -84user (talk) 02:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Holy cow! I really thought this was just a simple matter of alignment of article names. I don't edit any of those articles. Sorry to have dragged you into an anthill, C.Fred. --Elliskev 12:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

About AIV Request regarding User: 92.48.195.40

[8][9][10] User appears to be making good edits now, but has been vandalizing subtly. The edit summary of "revert" when he adds information not there before is unsettling. Johnman239 <3 (talk) 05:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Reference in article

I'm with you on needing a reference for the Catholic article, but they have had scads of time to come up with one. Three months is normally plenty long IMO if the statement is real. I think one or more of these were bogus! Student7 (talk) 13:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

prod??

AT the discussion at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darwin-Wallace Medal you mentioned you prodded one of the awards listed as examples, but I cannot figure out which? DGG (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

IPvandals' 3RR violation

To admin, the user seemingly Azukimonaka actually violated WP:3RR already with his another dynamic IP

218.43.117.240 (talk · contribs), same ISP and same agenda, same edit on the section.

1st revert 2008-07-19T20:28:07 by 218.43.117.240
2nd revert 2008-07-20T15:33:40 by 218.230.158.39
3rd revert 2008-07-20T15:37:47 by 218.230.158.39
4th revert 2008-07-20T15:44:47 by 218.230.158.39

SSP is not very effective to anons. --Caspian blue (talk) 16:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Blasphemy Against The Holy Spirit page

Yes, the blasphemy against the holy spirit is the one sin in the entire Bible which is unforgivable. Because no one has ever explained what the sin is and how it is committed the sin-blaspheming against the holy spirit-has been called by the nature of the penalty when assigned by God-unforgivable. So, "eternal sin" is a synonym for "unforgivable sin". Additionally, the sin is also referred to in terms of its consequences as the "unpardonable sin". However, because my article will actually describe the sinful act and explain the actions that constitute the sin, as well as explain why people commit it instead of attempting to explain the sin in terms of its consequences it is much more meaningful if the page is named after the name of the sin, "Blasphemy Against The Holy Spirit".
As of present, all articles (e.g. those on Wikipedia, and those external to Wikipedia) about the unforgivable sin represent each author deducing each of the different possible explanations as to what the sin is, what causes it, what kind of sinful solitary act can a human being that results in them being-from that point in time forward-eternally unforgivable to God. But, however, up to present-2008-all, or almost all of the multiple possible alternative explanations of the unforgivable sin have been incorrect. Thanks to the grace of God, and to God alone, He, for whatever reason, allowed others and myself to obtain conclusive proof of what the sin is, what results from it, and what the rewards and punishments of the unforgivable sinners whom commit it are.
I evidence information which sets the record straight by demonstrating how all those explanation theorized to date are not possibly the correct explanation of the unforgivable sin. Likewise, I explain the reasons why the true explanation of blaspheming against the Holy Spirit that I disclose, and, which I demonstrate to have already been evidenced on at least two different ocasions by a solitary and very reputable 3rd party source's publications and which conclusively disproves the other alternate explanations for the unforgivable sin.
If not, let me know. My explanation of what the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is is based upon information I viewed within the following books, "The Church Of Satan: A History Of The World's Most Notorious Religion" by Blanche Barton, 1990; "An Exorcist Tells His Story" by Fr. Gabriele Amorth, 1990; "An Exorcist More Stories" by Fr. Gabriele Amorth, 1992; and "The New American Bible", 1992. Additionally, my explanation includes objective facts and conclusions all of which are conclusively deduced and can be logically proven. C.Fred Is there anything else that I need to do before I can create an article entitled, "Blasphemy Against The Holy Spirit" given that I've provided some of my very reputable, third-party references? Please advise me ASAP. Thanks.Llooke11 (talk) 19:52, 21 July 2008 (UTC).

edits on telecare

-- user jlgmcmahon july 22, 2008 11:55 I am probably using the wrong venue for this, I recieved your messages, I did not realize all my edits were sent to you I will read more of the guidlines before posting again, also I did not intend to use it for advertising, but looking for genuine contributions from people in this area, having a sales and marketing background I tend to sound like I am pitching. If you can suggest a more aprobriate way to get contribution and insights from others working in this area I would be extremely apreciative —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlgmcmahon (talk • contribs) 04:23, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

copper sulfide

I have rolled back your change- this is part of an edit to correct information.--Axiosaurus (talk) 16:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

copper sulfide

I have rolled back your change- this is part of an edit to correct information.--Axiosaurus (talk) 16:46, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey ho! When you do what you feel you have to do - please do not lose the new information now in the copper(I) sulfide page. Unfortunately the rules are a little "restrictive" and the reult we need to achieve is that the family information is named copper sulfide and there is a new article on copper(I) sulfide.--Axiosaurus (talk) 16:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Looks all OK thanks - I hall now edit the coper sulfide page to link it to other pages and correct some of the chemstry--Axiosaurus (talk) 17:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Why did you delete my article?

Hi. You speedily-deleted my article on Syed B. Ali, citing non-notability. However, he's the president/CEO of Cavium. Googling it will give you nearly a quarter-million hits. And if it's notable, why not its founder/president/CEO?.Dostyar (talk) 22:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

I looked at WP:BIO as you suggested. You're right in that being the head of a company doesn't make you automatically notable. However, this person founded a company with a current market capitalization of over half a billion dollars ($683 million today, according to Google Finance). That should qualify as unusual enough to deserve attention. He is mentioned occasionally in the news. Here's Google News for the month[11]. He has also won the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award for Technology[12] more than once. True, no one seems to have (yet) written a book about the guy. However, there do seem to be a large number of primary sources (Google Syed Ali Cavium, excluding results from cavium.com). Wouldn't you say all these, when put together, was evidence of notability?Dostyar (talk) 00:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Apology and thanks

Hello! I am sorry for the incorrect tagging on the speedy delete tagging from earlier. And thanks for downgrading my warning on that editor's page -- I was going to do that, but you got there first. Be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 03:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey again. Please accept this as a token of my appreciation and admiration:

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For adding a touch of class to Wikipedia. Ecoleetage (talk) 04:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Be well! Ecoleetage (talk) 04:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

The Blasphemy Against The Holy Spirit Article

Hello C.Fred. I've opted to upload the article to my user space as you suggested. I would greatly appreciate it if you would critique it. Please let me know what changes you suggest making as soon as is possible. Thanks. Scott.Llooke11 (talk) 04:02, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

RV

Thanks for the revert! Greatly appreciated. Happy editing! Scottydude _talk 04:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Scottydude _talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

A vandal

Hi, you removed a vandal from AIV because their last block was 3 weeks ago [13], but their last block was for 2 weeks. They have been blocked 3 times since March, and have even erased their talk page before. This person is obviously a long term vandal. NJGW (talk) 04:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Someone Deleted My Test Page "Blasphemy Against The Holy Spirit"

C.Fred. How can I find out who deleted the article I published on my user page following your suggestion?Llooke11 (talk) 18:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Independent Sources and Windows Vista

Thanks for your prompt reply on my talk page! I don't know where to publish this and can I add thread here... but some more thoughts...

As a sample, Windows Vista and "indepent reliable sources about it--articles in PC magazines, general tech magazines, Wired, etc."

- Indeed, all those sources are dependent on outdated and dead Windows 3.10, Windows. 3.11, Windows 95, etc. Windows Vista is just a product with own Time-to-Live... nothing is new with Windows. It's copyrighted and protected by thousands patents technology, and it is based on head and shoulders of giants such as George Boole and many others who never tried to limit their findings to special group of people (who pay money).

I provided sample with Potato - this is the best sample on what should be published here. We don't need articles on separate page about Intel 8080, but perhaps it could be listed in an article on CPU... Funtick (talk) 22:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Darren Stevens‎...

Heeeeeeee's baaaaaack...] - Adolphus79 (talk) 03:29, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Listen

All i di was make a funny.--I am A genius [so bow] I Be The genius (talk) 14:57, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Which wasn't very funny. —C.Fred (talk) 14:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Can you just help me with an article?--I am A genius [so bow] I Be The genius (talk) 15:34, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

The article is ==Scholastic News Kid Press Corp. Just make it amazing.--I am A genius [so bow] I Be The genius (talk) 15:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

As an admin stepping into the situation, this seemed pretty straightforward to me. Two dozen edits, none of them constructive. Tan ǀ 39 15:50, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Vandal-fighter concern

I'm a little worried about this user, who seems to frequently report "vandals" who aren't vandals at all. I'm not worried about one or two borderline reports, but this comes up over and over. You can see he warned that IP four times for edits that were clearly not vandalism. Do me a favor - keep an eye on this with me, would ya? I appreciate the efforts of vandal-fighters, but we can't have overzealous ones running people out of town for no reason. Tan ǀ 39 17:12, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Fearne Cotton

Good work, protecting the Reggie Yates article, but I feel his co-host Fearne Cotton is and will become a target, and probably needs similar protection. Thanks Rambo's Revenge (talk) 17:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Nyrva Dragonrhyne

Hello -- regarding your posting at this link--

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Craigy144&diff=prev&oldid=228727965

You stated "Technically, the article failed A7, since it's about a fictional character, and works of fiction are not subject to speedy deletion under that criterion. —C.Fred (talk) 02:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)"

Does this mean I can have the article restored to Wiki? I didn't get a chance to add any more to it before it got deleted. How can I get it put back up?

If it cannot be "undeleted" can I repost the article as best as I can reconstruct it?

Also, how do I add images?

Thanks! :D Witaku (talk) 22:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello again.

Thanks for restoring the article. I admit, I read the guidelines for notabilty but I am not sure what to add to this one to "prove" it notable. Any ideas? (I'm totally new to this, so please bear with me.) What kind of things would I want to add?

Also - how do I get images put up on here showing the character's likeness, etc?

Thanks again. :D Witaku (talk) 22:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter, Issue 5

Apologies for the late delivery; here is the June edition of the newsletter.


The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 5 • 21 June 2008 • About the Newsletter
Departments Project news Deletion debates Featured member From the editors	Features USRD gets showings at Hartford Road Meet Record 6 Wikipedians show up at Chicago Road Meet USRD hits 10,000 articles	State and national updates Leaderboard USH Colorado/ New Mexico Michigan Michigan County Designated Highways Nevada New York Utah Washington
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot (talk) 20:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Removing CSD tags

Saw your note at AIV. My two cents ... if it's from an article that the user created, I'm willing to spot them one time out of ignorance. Repetitions are clearly vandalism, and are an extremely frustrating form of vandalism at that, because they cause edit-wars.
Kww (talk) 22:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Explain to me why you deleted solomon

its funny you delete solomon and say that the reason is because he dosnt abide with what it says above,but yet you leave people like merlin? --Thew Morte (talk) 00:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

a legend? I would like to see you go to any arab country and call it that. but also notice i put "king said to be the builder of the first temple with the help of demons" I reconized king and put said by that.You can not prove solomon as a real person anymore or less then I can prove he built the temple with the help of demons. --Thew Morte (talk) 02:42, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Death

According to the Quran, the death of Sulayman was a lesson to be learned,

Then, when We decreed (Sulayman's) death, nothing showed them his death except a little worm of the earth, which kept (slowly) gnawing away at his staff: so when he fell down, the Jinns saw plainly that if they had known the unseen, they would not have tarried in the humiliating Penalty (of their Task). Quran 34:14

When Sulayman was to die, he was standing watching the work of his (Jinn) slaves while reclining on his cane. There he silently passed away, but did not fall. He remained in this position, for forty days and the Jinns thought that he was still alive watching them work, and so they kept working an extra 40 days. But the termites were eating at the cane all these days so that the body of Sulayman fell after forty days. It was thereafter that the Jinn (along with all humans) fell in their hands that they did not know more than God had allotted them to know. --Thew Morte (talk) 02:47, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

The Alliance of Women Film Journalists

Hello Fred. I've been notified by someone who attempted to add information about the Alliance of Women Film Journalists that the entry was deleted by you, and I'm writing to you about that. I understand that the entry about the Alliance of Women Film Journalists, or AWFJ.org, was deleted because it included no substantive material to prove importance or relevance. I see from your profile that you are interested primarily in things having to do with highways. The AWFJ is an organization that deals with the subject of film and, more particularly, women and film. That is obviously a very different sort of subject matter, and it's quite understandable that you might not be familiar with the work AWFJ does, nor with the organizations importance, nor of the level to which it is recognized in the film industry, among media covering film, and by the general moviegoing public. So, to fill you in, I'd like to suggest that you Google the Alliance of Women Film Journalists. You will find 226,000 pages (at least that's the number that's currently on the screen) referring to the Alliance of Women Film Journalists from sources as diverse as Movie City News, the Hollywood Reporter, Variety, USA Today, Salon.com, Cinematical.com, About.com, indiewire.com and hundreds more--all highly regarded, highly credible sources. Some of these--USA Today, among them--are geneneral interest news pubication, and you will immediately recognize their importance, I'm sure. Others, such as indiewire.com and cinematical, are more focused on the entertainment industry, so you may not immediately recognize their credibility and influence--since this is not your field of expertise. But a very brief bit of research will go a long way in proving to you and whichever other decision-makers at Wikipedia are ruling on the inclusion of the Alliance of Women Film Journalists on your pages--that they are, indeed, valid beyond question as credible sources that refer, and frequently so, to the Alliance of Women Film Journalists. Additionally, a visit to the Alliance of Women Film Journalists' website at www.awfj.org will immediately indicate the scope and credibility of the organization, a nonprofit (this is not a buisiness that is trying to promote itself and its site for monetary gain) charitible nationwide association of the leading women film journalists in America. Neither the organization nor its members are fly-by-might. In fact, www.awfj.org is the go to source for women's perspectives on film and the film industry. That said, I'd suggest that while the person who submitted the Alliance of Women Film Journalists is probably aware of the attention the Alliance of Women Film Journalists has received from the film industry, other media and the general public, he may not have been familiar with the necessity for citing referrences to AWFJ nor, for that matter, of how to do so. Would you be kind enough to inform him of how to do this, or inform me and I will pass the information along to him. Thanks for your consideration and best regards, Jennifer Merin awfjinc@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jennifermerin (talk • contribs) 19:37, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Alliance of Women Film Journalists - Follow up

Hello again, Fred. I just noticed on Google.com that there is an Ask Wikipedia call for information regarding the Alliance of Women Film Journalists. I gather, then, that people in the Wikipedia community are aware of the Alliance of Women Film Journalists. This further substantiates my request that the Alliance of Women Film Journalists text previously submitted to Wikipedia be reinstated. Thanks again for your consideration and please let me know of your intentions. Jennifer Merin awfjinc@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jennifermerin (talk • contribs) 19:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Bread of Life Ministries International Logo

Hello Fred. Unfortunately i do not hold the rights to the logo. I;m quite new here so can you teach me how i can get a copyright permission? thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peridan (talk • contribs) 20:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

RE: Pointer: speedy deletion and the Snooky article

I was the one that tagged it for speedy delete. User:Arbiteroftruth added it to AFD and I commented that I added the speedy template to it.-- Darth Mike _(Talk _{• Contribs)} 02:21, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Will do! -- Darth Mike _(Talk _{• Contribs)} 02:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Ann Angel

I added a page for a real person named Ann Angel but it was deleted before I had a chance to explain why she should be here.

I know she's not as popular as Jenna Jameson or Jesse Capelli but Anna still has a very loyal fan following and in my opinion deserves to be here at Wikipedia. I was also going to add a profile photo but since I'm a new member it wouldn't allow me.

Marcus7171 (talk) 20:47 May 25 2008 (UTC)

RAVAGE's wiki page to be deleted????

i ventured to the page below... after someone told me it might be deleted..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAVAGE_%28rapper%29

i am in discogs as a legitimate indie artist.. and i am an activist here in NY state.. i am not sure what do to but..on wiki pedia..

i appeared here 1st: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsta_Island_Czars

someone put that page there..and i saw the link for my name and clicked on it.. and decided to update the info that was there the most relevant stuff that i am doing..

This May 2008 i was featured in Hip Hop Connection Magazine which sells per month, over 40,000 issues in Europe. here is the link http://www.hhcmagazine.com/

I was featured on Mp3.com for the remixes.. please review here:

http://www.mp3.com/features/stories/10956.html

why is the page nominated to be deleted? thank you so much for your time C.Fred 2:55 PM EST, 11 July 2008

User talk:HS 8291

Will you protect his talk page, he is using it to cause disruption, he is already blocked? Landon1980 (talk) 02:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. Landon1980 (talk) 02:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi again, I wanted to ask you a question if you don't mind. I am still a pretty new editor, and I'm still learning a lot of things. I have been doing some recent changes patrol, and reporting a few vandals to AIV. I am usually pretty good about knowing when to report, and when not to. I think that IP last night (203.45.16.13) is the first not receive a block. So my question is when I find someone vandalizing and they have previous warnings how recent do they have to be? Like today being the 4th, say they received up to a level 2 on the second of this month, do I fall in with a level 3 or do I start the process all over again? Have a good day, Landon1980 (talk) 13:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes, that helps. I just don't like wasting others time by reporting IP's that require no action to AIV. I know next to nothing about IP's and how they work. Take myself for an example, I have had the same IP for a year now. I have cable internet through Time Wariner, so I don't know when or if they change your IP. As long as I've been checking mine its been the same. Before I started patrolling the recent changes I read over all the warning templates, like when to use them and what not, and the blocking policy. All it said was "recent" warnings, just wasn't sure what was considered recent when dealing with an IP. One more thing if you don't care. I see quite a lot of fellow editors start out with a level 2, or skip one or two levels sometimes (most of the time dealing with very blatant vandalism) Is that ok to do? I know in extreme cases it warrants a level4im, but I'm talking about things like replacing page content with "OMG Jim Carry is so hilarious" and things like that. Landon1980 (talk) 17:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

It's me again, sorry to bother you once again. You should have never said I could ask you for help :). I monitor the new pages sometimes, and I see a lot of stuff that doesn't belong here for various reasons. The thing is I don't know how to tag them properly. For instance, the article Houseway was deleted a yesterday, and User:Ntinis has already recreated the article. What am I supposed to do? If you don't have time to help me I completely understand. Have a good day, Landon1980 (talk) 03:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

The Lutheran Evangelical Protestant Church

I'm not sure I'm doing the right thing here so forgive me and please give a redirect if needed. The The Lutheran Evangelical Protestant Church page has a "The neutrality of this article is disputed.Please see the discussion on the talk page. (April 2008)Please do

not remove this message until the dispute is resolved." notice but there is nothing recorded on the talk page

as to the reason or the section that is being disputed. Can you please advise?

Also this notice "This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please improve this article if you can. (April 2008)" Can you advise as to how the article needs improvement, please? Thanks. (Lutheranepc (talk) 04:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC))Bishop Drew

Problems with User:75.47.133.42

You undid a controversial move by 75.47.133.42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). Could you please look at that user's other contributions that have not yet been reverted, particularly those to articles about roads? I suspect that they may all be vandalism, but I don't know U.S. roads well enough to decide. Some of his other edits (such as speedies on various legitimate redirects) have already been reverted. --Eastmain (talk) 04:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Afd Close

Can you close this prolonged the Afd discussion on this topic Ffighter44, the nominator, has asked for his AfD to be withdrawn. Artene50 (talk) 19:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Kanabekobaton

This user has continued to make hundreds of edits a day without bothering to explain themselves when challenged, including page moves and redirects. All inexplicably deemed minor. A discussion has been opened here. DarkAudit (talk) 23:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Do not question Authority

C.Fred why did you mettle in what i did i was adding a block thing go to User:MasterAsh1 he had a big thing of text 2 months before i joined him then a staff member deleted it saying on his talk page that he always vandilized only 2 times so did that as his last warning same with him and he just added that text REPLY IMMIDIATLY —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Enigmatic Knight (talk • contribs) 04:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

The exorcism chant of evil spammers revival REPLY

The bones they crack;the bones they creep. The men come alive in the briny deep. You ended our death,You ended our sleep. The men come alive in the briny deep. So come with us, come with the men. Come meet your fate with Captain Ben. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Enigmatic Knight (talk • contribs) 05:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

540, 147 and relevant toll (for or against) discussion

C.Fred, I believe you and I need to discuss how we can come to terms here. My user can be found at gmail, or you can write me directly at the No Tolls on 540 email at gmail as well. What appears to be some kind of wiki-battle is not forthcoming for either of us. Talk to you in email. thanks. Turnpike420 (talk) 18:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Zodiac vandalism

You removed the report with Zodiac vandalism, citing that it hadn't been edited in a while.. probably best to leave these up so a few admins can do the annoying job of searching for the vandalized template. I still haven't found it... Tan ǀ 39 18:39, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Block of Aaroncrick

Greetings. I had Aaroncrick (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) send me an email. His concern is that he was falsely accused of sockpuppetry. What were the diffs you saw that prompted you to block him? I'm not seeing the similarities, but I may just be overlooking them. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 16:59, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

See [14] -- Netsnipe ► 04:43, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

RE:MasterAsh1 being blocked

you said that i deleted his words and that he wasnt really blocked well copy and paste this and put it in the adress bar and look at the M and click MasterAsh1 believe me now http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MZMcBride/Sandbox_5

REPLY —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Enigmatic Knight (talk • contribs) 06:02, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Non-action on 98.180.215.216

Regarding the lack of a final warning on User:98.180.215.216: this is the same editor as User:98.180.215.212 and User:98.180.215.33 (in addition to several school-year 70.178.* and 130.184.* addresses) who continue to undo redirects against consensus and who's stated on multiple talk pages his/her plan to continue to vandalize. At least one or two of this user's other IPs have worked themselves up to a one-month block for this editor's vandalism on Planet Express and redirects to List of characters in the Firefly universe. In other words, this editor has received multiple "final notices." --EEMIV (talk) 23:38, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Between one of those two 98.* addresses, I saw his intent to keep disrupting. The latest IP also just got a one-month block. It may also be time to protect the redirects. —C.Fred (talk) 00:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. Assuming this nitwit is still in college, activity from the Wichita IPs won't resume (much) beyond the blocks, but'll kick up again from some Arkansas IPs when classes again resume. I halfway think there might be a registered used behind it: User:130.184.82.235 was the earliest IP to start this up, and the editor pretty early jumped into the Village Pump to whine about trivia policies. Or, could just be a long-time non-editing-reader who decided to make his first round of edits vandalism. Eh. I dunno. --EEMIV (talk) 03:54, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

I've got an article or two watchlisted, like I do for the User:Serafin sockpuppets. Sometimes, it's just a matter of cleaning up when it happens. That's what the mop's for. —C.Fred (talk) 04:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your prompt reply on Delta Upsilon!! Jrssr5 20:43, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Scary Movie 5

I heard that there were A Scary Movie 5 so I went to create one So I think it should be created [Cruz Perea 21:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)] User:Cperea1994

Replying to your talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 21:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

The Lutheran Evangelical Protestant Church

Please give further direction on how to remove complaints. Are there specific areas still in need of work? Additional resources etc have been added. I'm not sure how to go about having other editors participate. Isn't that out of my control? I don't know what else to do to satisfy complaints. I've looked at other lutheran sites and the LEPC seems OK in comparison.There are some with no complaint tags but they have no resources. Thanks for any help. Lutheranepc (talk) 01:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)HIS2008

Throwball (Thunderball)

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from [[{{{1}}}]], which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! I have removed the deletion notice, so that a reasonable alternative can be met. The Wikipedia page Wikipedia:Alternative outlets states "Just because the content does not belong here does not mean it does not have value, and it is worth preserving valuable free content if we can" This content can be certainly preserved and is certainly of value.

Your Obvious contention with the page is that it falls under the wikipedia policy on original research In that it appears to be an Original invention. and that "it is not notable enough to be Wikipedia article material until multiple, independent, and reliable secondary sources report on it." I am not contesting your right to question my article but am trying to foster WikiLove and save an article that may turn into something more then an "Original Invention" very soon.

ThunderJaemin (talk) 06:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)ThunderJaeminThunderJaemin (talk) 06:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Miamiboyzinhere back?

First-day edits from new user Comayagua show a lot of similarity with tendentious edits by blocked editor Miamiboyzinhere. Whoville (talk) 17:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

68.175.102.177

I think you missed his recent edits due to server lag. He's made three edits in the past hour, all reverts. See also [[15]]. --Ronz (talk) 01:41, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

99.227.97.230

Thank you for monitoring 99.227.97.230. If I may, I think Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jordanjames might be of some relevance. I have requested page protection for Orville Lloyd Douglas.67.71.29.22 (talk) 02:25, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Vandalism

Cruz Perea 22:01, 21 August 2008 (UTC)They had said Ashley Tisdale was on episode 1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cperea1994 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Block of Comayagua99

I ran a "poor man's checkuser". Miamiboyzinhere: Unique pages:100 Edit count: 285 Normal edit time: 15:7:17

Comayagua99: Unique pages:583 Edit count: 2284 Normal edit time: 12:15:34

Combined: 8 total edits to combined pages: Comayagua99: 581 Miamiboyzinhere: 19 total combined edits : 600

They share a striking 600 combined edits in total. Comayagua99 made 581 edits in the same articles as Miamiboyzinhere. That is one-quarter of all Comayagua99's edits. It's really rare to see such high percentage of similarity for 2 separate accounts. They also have very close normal edit time. As for the IP's vandalism spree, sometimes they employ such strategies to trick people into believing that they're separate. I'm willing to change my block decision if you got more evidence, because SSP is not CU so everything's murky and guess work in here. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 03:37, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Done. I still believe there's a chance that they're socks, because I didn't file that SSP report. So obviously someone's thinking along the same line as me. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 04:20, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

This edit is probably relevant to this conversation.Kww (talk) 16:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

And also this. Well, I guess my instinct was right. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 00:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Phi Psi Sigma

please explain what i have to do in order for this page to pass the inspection. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justout09 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Carillion plc

Please could you move Carillion plc to Carillion to comply with naming conventions. Many thanks in anticipation. Dormskirk (talk) 18:29, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:RFARB#Eastern Mediterranean University

Your participation is appreciated. --Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 07:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Criminologist1963

Hi,

Regards your edit summary here, is AN/I the place to go? I ask not because I doubt your comment, but because I just don't know. It's quite rare that I'll post on AN or AN/I - generally AIV is sufficient to my needs. I posted a comment here but to no response so far. It's the best summary to date of what I'm thinking, but it's missing how damned frustrated I am.

I'm wary of WP:PARENT, so if the simple answer is "post at AN/I" I'll remove my post on WT:AIV and put it over there instead. Thanks, WLU (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi,

Thanks for your comments on my talk page. I'll wait to see if it happens again. If so, I'll post on AN/I instead with some caveats on talk:AIV to avoid PARENT. WLU (talk) 19:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Sauropods

Hello C.Fred. Just here to notify you that the user is asking for an admin to unblock him/her. Cheers, ~ Troy (talk) 19:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for the help. Also Derpus's talk page appears to be similar, but I have requested for help at WP:RFP, so no need to worry about it :P. Best regards, ~ Troy (talk) 20:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Bristol palin

Hello, C Fred.

Another editor has accused me of acting in bad faith in deleting this. Happened to notice you seemed to be awake. Could you look and tell me what you think. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 04:47, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Secondary to this user (Bristol Palin), who is a sock of Cipspic (talk · contribs), this guy has been vandalizing the Applebee's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) article for several days now. Each time he is blocked, he creates a new account and renews the vandalism. Your temp-semi block on Applebee's will do nothing to stop him. Would you please upgrade the protection to temp-full?

--Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 17:42, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Adrenaline rooster

Apparently the ban wasn't enough; he's back to vandalising and threatening on his talk page; I guess you need to lock it. --Blowdart | ^talk 17:12, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Streamophone

An article that you have been involved in editing, Streamophone, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streamophone. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

User: Staniel Kohlhardt

Hello,

The User is unrelated to the family but has used a family name. I can confirm that no member of the family was involved in the creation of this article. The use of specific identifiers is unacceptable, therefore deleted. We would prefer deletion of the User name and entire article.

Uluru1 (talk) 15:02, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Help

Pinkadelica has been helpful in trying to resolve the issue of me being blocked. SchuminWeb blocked me for improper user name. I created a new user name although I was editing under the name of ISUPK and after reading guidelines, I had no idea that it was not allowed.

1) What is causing a conflict of interest? >I changed my user name.

2) Unless I am not understanding what objective and promotion means, can you be clearer? >What I posted was objective, it was what the organization does and who we are. I do not understand how posting information about the Israelite School of Universal Practical Knowledge is promotion. There are no sentences asking for money or how to contact the organization. I am familiar with the organization because I am the Non-profit's Executive Director.

I have contacted SchuminWeb and he never contacted me back besides blocking me. I would like to know what can be done to resolve the issue.

Thank you,

Star5279 (talk) 15:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Schumin Web Editing

Schumin Web placed on the page the following:

"Israelite School of Universal Practical Knowledge (ISUPK) is a non-profit organization based in Upper Darby, Pennsylvania. The group is part of the Hebrew Israelism movement which regards American Blacks as the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel."

Neither Southern Poverty Law Center article states the above.

"History of Hebrew Israelism". Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved on 2008-09-08.

>States," Although followers of Black Judaism thought of themselves as the descendants of the biblical 12 tribes of Israel"

I understand that any one can add information to any page however can it be correctly, directly quoted from the source that is it gathered from?

Star5279 (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

I appreciate your feeback/help!!! Thank YOU

First, thank you for explaining to me, clearly that me opening an account with the user name, "ISUPK" is indeed against the user name guidelines. > No, problem. I truly was acting in good faith to create a new account with a different user name. > I will check your notes to see how I can add to the article. > I have no problem with any one adding information, I just expect it to be directly quoted from the source. I also do not mind more scrutiny than usual; it's welcomed, all I ask is that the page hold facts, with true quotes and resources...

Again, Thank you

Star5279 (talk) 18:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

YOUR ARE GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

C.Fred,

Again, THANK YOU! I can not begin to explain how much insight you have given me in where I went wrong in compiling a page on Wikipedia. You are very helpful and clear. I appreciate your patience and understanding but most of all, your customer service & kind demeanor.

I have no problem uploading all the articles that has been done on the organization. That can be a subheading or heading, no problem! I do understand that the editor was acting in good faith by acknowledging all the negative press we've received; no problem. As an editor myself, I would at least wanted our location to be correct and the number of tribes to be correct because it is not 10 but instead 12. No article he has as a source says 10; I re-visited and researched them all. Because those articles have been written about the organization, the sources indeed are legitimate.

That said, am I, under the new user name allowed to edit the article?

>If so, you have given me guidelines as to what I can place on the page and I have no problem following the rules:

1) I am allowed to post a summary of the organization

2) Goals

3) Major programs >I have no problem re-phrasing the words so that they are not from our website. >Keeping it a solid prose summary, about 2-3 times as long as the current text.

4) I will put back the actual website as a primary source without a problem.

5) I will not mention any awards for our website will give that information.

6) I will put the noise complaints and other negative issues/articles about our organization in a "Criticisms" section at the bottom of the article.

Can I add pictures? I had 2 of up there and they were emailed to me from the magazine. I also cited them as a source from the magazine.

Again, I have no problem melding/merging the content together. I am glad that you understand that the article can exclude any description of the organization just because it's sourced from the ISUPK website.

I can do the editing once I am no longer blocked or send you the information? Which works best?

Star5279 (talk) 19:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

User: Beefcake32

I ask that you make the block for longer than 72 hours; their behaviour has been habitual, and even now they refuse to obey the simplest request of leaving the block notice up. Thanks. Quaeler (talk) 16:51, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

A Response Please

I would like to know if I can add content now (under the specific rules- see previous post) and am no longer blocked?

Thank you

Star5279 (talk) 17:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Can YOU please clarify...

The User name ISUPK will remained blocked but I can add content to the page? Can you please clarify...

Star5279 (talk) 03:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Metamorphosis locust

Hi. I took your "merge" tag off, because I found the article was simply a cut-and-paste from the existing article Metamorphosis - so I've tagged it for deletion. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:42, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

shenanigans at cladistics

Hi C Fred. Consist has edited Cladistics and Talk:Cladistics with his boilerplate vandalism again, since you left a warning on his/her user talk page. I think a block may be in order... de Bivort 06:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Your requested explanation

Due to personal circumstances I am not able to give you now the requested explanation with regard to the discussion about satanic ritual abuse in the Netherlands. As soon as it is possible, I will give the explanation. Criminologist1963 (talk) 14:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Dispute Tag

Thank you C.Fred for the clarification. Can you now take off the "dispute" flag since the issue has been resolved?

Again, Thank you!

Star5279 (talk) 05:20, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Umair22

Please reconsider your comment on WP:AIV. He's been blocked twice already, we don't have to keep giving warnings to people who have already been blocked for vandalism. Corvus cornix_talk 03:02, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Noticed this, and have to side with CC on this one. The editor has repetitively vandalized the same article, and been blocked for it twice. He's now been given an indefinite block, which is quite appropriate. There's no reason to repeat warning cycles ... if an editor repeats an edit that he has been blocked for, he can and should be blocked again without the need for further warnings.Kww (talk) 03:18, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

i have to agree, and I would ask you C.Fred to explain your logic behind this as it makes no sense.--Crossmr (talk) 03:26, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

To keep it all in one place, I would suggest moving any discussion back to WP:ANI. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

O.B.Montessori

Hi C.Fred, I was wondering why you can't speedy a school?. Why must it go through the Afd rather than Speedy deletion? --Superflewis (talk) 16:11, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Fantasy userpages

Killing two birds with one stone. First, a user you blocked, Alis.Payan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has resurfaced as Alicia.Payan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). She hasn't been abusively socking, but she is obviously headed for trouble, as not a single one of her contributions has been kept. If you stumble across her again, you probably want to keep the original block in mind. Second, take a look at User:Alicia.Payan. I've been seeing more and more of these, where kids have produced elaborate userpages intended to mimic articles about themselves, portraying themselves as stars of movies, TV shows, etc. Does this violate anything? I keep looking at them and thinking this is wrong, but I can't bring myself to report them anywhere, because they seem more stupid than harmful.Kww (talk) 22:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Maura Harrington

Point taken user:mustycrusty 13:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter, Issue 6 (FINAL ISSUE)


The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 6 • 8 September 2008 • About the Newsletter
Departments Project news Deletion debates Featured member From the editors	Features Gap appears in freeway New York subproject appears on the Wikipedia Signpost New York State Routes leaves jurisdiction of USRD From the editors—newsletter decommissioned	State and national updates State and national updates
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—Rschen7754bot (talk) 03:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

User:12.210.198.245

When she started using five or six sockpuppets at once to claim that she isn't a sockpuppet, that was a problem. When I noticed in several of her talk pages that she has autism, I understood. I've worked with autistic people before. Sometimes they get stuck in a loop of sorts, and aren't able to break out of repetitive and inappropriate behaviors. I therefore decided to help her break the loop by shutting her down completely. I've protected all the talk pages she was using indefinitely (except the ip, since we don't block/protect those indefinitely). I hope you don't think I've gone too far here, but I don't think we're doing her any favors by allowing her to keep spending hours writing nonsense on her talk pages for days and days on end. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:49, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

DJ Warrior

Should it be Dj warrior, or DJ Warrior? I want to say the latter, since the abbreviation of DJ is usually caps and warrior is a proper noun in this situation? ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 20:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Talk page vandalism at Talk:Cladistics?

Hello C.Fred. I would semi-protect this Talk page if another admin would support that. As you know we have a very enthusiastic IP who is on a permanent war for the truth. The IP is presumably User:Consist. I notice that all his Talk edits are being routinely reverted, which suggests they may be considered vandalism. There have not been any good-faith IP editors contributing to the page for a year or more. I'd suggest semi-protecting the article as well. EdJohnston (talk) 00:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm reluctant to semi-protect a talk page, especially if the article is (likely to be) semi-protected, since it blocks an avenue for constructive contribution. That said, there is an issue with User:Consist and Cladistics, yes. So long as he's editing from one IP, a long block on the IP is probably the way to go. If he starts IP hopping, then yes, I would endorse semi-protection of the article and, if necessary, the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 01:49, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. But checking the history of Talk:Cladistics, he's already used five different IPs since 1 September. No IP address is ever re-used after he switches. Wouldn't that fit the definition of IP-hopping? :-) EdJohnston (talk) 02:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

WHY?

WHY, would you delete my entry, WHY when it is 100% official and properly referenced, WHY would you do that? WHY? this does not make ANY SENSE. WHATSOEVER. --Journaldiction (talk) 20:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Requesting that you put it back up, NOW

How can this be official, when wikipedia has SO many entries related to DJ's whom I can't even find on GOOGLE, with NO references. DO one GOOGLE search on DJ WARRIOR. He is a world-renowned DJ. I am VERY furious that you deleted my hard work on this legendary DJ, put it back up right now, --Journaldiction (talk) 21:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

COMMUNITY CONSENSUS??

BULLSHIT,

COMMENT Wow, are weeks ever short in your part of the world. I have just been advised that the article has been "properly referenced" ... any comments prior to this, eenhh. BMW(drive) 21:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

o REPLY I feel like I'm in the movie Se7en except all I see are blogs instead of dead people. JBsupreme (talk) 21:42, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

o COMMENT It looks like it may meet notability under No. 5 here. "Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable sub-culture." --Woland (talk) 23:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Comment I've rewritten part of the article; I also moved it to match his real name. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 10:12, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

IT TOLD ME TO LEAVE THE TAG ON, WHILE YOU GUYS REVIEW IT, WHICH I DID, MEAN WHILE THERE IS 100'S OF BULLSHIT PAGES OUT THERE WITH NO REFERENCES THAT HAVE BEEN UP FOR YEARS!!!! WTF!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Journaldiction (talk • contribs) 21:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

List of current NHL captains and alternate captains

Hello C.Fred. Just like to say, keep up the great work (with the citations). GoodDay (talk) 23:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Grant Mazzy

You deleted this article but for some reason it's still appearing on Special:Newpages --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:18, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

This user or account is vandalising as soon as it was unblocked... Care to take preventative action as you did last time? Cheers, Freestyle-69 (talk) 03:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Many thanks. Hopefully one day we'll see registered-user-only editing... Freestyle-69 (talk) 03:46, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Christ you are out to lunch

I have no idea what you are talking about. I included all the correct references to a notable character under notability NO.5 on Wikipedia's Policies, and I watched the original page get deleted, and I do not agree. So I am re-posting my entry, as it is notable...and deleting it for no reason is insane. Stop power tripping over your account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luminite (talk • contribs) 04:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Pedrovip

Can you take a look at the talk page (especially the history of it) for Pedrovip (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and give me advice on the best way to handle the situation?Kww (talk) 14:49, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Miss Independent (album)

I draw your attention to MSoldi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), creator of hoax album Miss Independent (album), hoax album Autumn Goodbye (a fresh redirect was created today to point at this hoax, see [16] for the original), and a hoax album cover. I left him a "final warning" today, but I really felt more like some admin should be drop-kicking him across the internet. I left this note with Kurt Shaped Box as well.Kww (talk) 23:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

KOOP (FM)

Your involvement with KOOP-FM's wikipedia page is improper and unnecessary. In this day of age, are we really to believe the reports found on ABC or local media news? You are best advised to not spread rumor and slander. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AndrewDick69 (talk • contribs) 01:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Reliable sources from both the Associated Press and local media news have been used to confirm the facts in the article. Wikipedia is based on those, not opinions. EagleAg04 (talk) 01:56, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Just wanted to make you aware of a checkuser I have started about the multiple KOOP-FM vandals - NeutralHomer • Talk 02:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

I think the "attack" was I Warn4im'd one of the accounts. For more sources, try the websites of KVUE, KXAN, KTBC, and KEYE. If you need help, please let me know. - NeutralHomer • Talk 02:41, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Why do you allow http://www.offshoreanodes.com/ and not my information? {help me}Galvotec (talk)galvotec —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC).

Wolfpack F.C.

Wolfpack Football Club is a very well-known soccer team in this area. The entry was created so supporters could have a common website to find updated information on the club. Also, if any news breaks on the club, fans can update the information on their own, which will spread the news quicker, rather then waiting to hear it by word of mouth. This is exactly what Wikipedia was created for, and by deleting the page I feel you are simply taking away from the purpose of the website. There was no offending information on the page, and it had already gained a large following in the community. Deleting the page did absolutely nothing to benefit Wikipedia and all it accomplished was upsetting many people who were looking for a common page to find updated information on Wolfpack F.C. The page was really helping the club grow and gain an even larger following. I am asking that the page please be put back up. Jmcnutt28 (talk) 03:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Joule Broadway Apartments

Why was my posting of Joule Broadway apartments removed. There was no advertising posted only references to the new building being constructed. Please advise as I feel this is unfair. Darceyforbes (talk) 04:43, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

I now understand but I think that the rules should be the same for EVERYONE in the wikipedia community. There are MANY topics that I have looked at and the references and links are directly or indirectly to companies and it is advertisement so I recommend either allowing a site or disallowing all sites that "advertise". Thank You —Preceding unsigned comment added by Galvotec (talk • contribs) 18:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Fairfax County Chamber of Commerce

A tag has been placed on Fairfax County Chamber of Commerce, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Fairfax County Chamber of Commerce and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Sorry for the template. Bearian (talk) 17:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Behrouz Jamali

Dear C.Fred, in regards to Jamali's webpage and article Behrouz Jamali I must say that his website is not copyrighted and free to use or edit and this is the link http://www.behrouzjamali.com/pages/contact.htm Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tabrizli (talk • contribs) 20:54, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

The second article was in my own writing as instructed and it was not copied from his site. Please take a minute to compare. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tabrizli (talk • contribs) 21:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

CEPA

In response to the speedy deletion tag, I'm kinda new at this Wiki thing. I've tried to abide by the guidelines and I've reviewed other national organizations on wiki. I don't understand how the information in this one differs from so many of those which are not tagged for speed deletion? C. Fred can you please give me some suggestions? Thanks.

CEPA (talk) 22:38, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

User page usage

Hi Fred, Is this user page being used correctly? It leads to an ad for graphic design. I don't normally mess with user pages and I'm not certain what to do (or not). Thank you, ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 23:19, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Drive-by: the user hasn't made any edits except for this advertisement, and that was in January 2006. I think it's speedy deletable as spam.—Kww(talk) 00:34, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for taking care of that..that is how I would've thought it should be handled but I know that people get sensitive when altering user pages so I wanted to make sure. Cheers, ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 12:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Chris Heimerdigner Page

Independent sourcing exists for info, not just self-publishing, though I'm not quite sure what that means. But such info may not exist ON THE INTERNET. This highlights the inherent problem of Wikipedia itself. The apparent laziness of editors in doing the necessary legwork to source ANYTHING if it does not exist in an online form. For example, evidence that "Passage to Zarahemla" is a self-published work is in the opening page of the book. Are you willing to obtain a copy to verify this? Other non-online sources also verify this. But I do not mean to point the finger at you. Many Wikipeida editors are inclined toward this same lack of desire to use non-internet sources to confirm facts. In no other resource book or article except those on Wikipedia is the source material apparently required to also be visible online. Please highlight for us any info that you feel is not properly sourced and we (admitted fans of Mr. Heimerdinger) will give you NON-INTERNET sources as verification. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thumper10 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

NHL current captains & altertnate captains

Helloe C.Fred. I'm glad you removed Heatly, as the Sens official website have yet to bestow the 2nd A on anyone. Personally, I thought Fisher would get the honour, but he's currently injured (I think). GoodDay (talk) 23:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Okie Dokie. I guess coach Craig Hartsburg had other plans; sorry Fish. GoodDay (talk) 23:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Craig Heskey

Thanks for that. — Ceran thor [Formerly LordSunday] 14:02, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks :)

Thanks for speedily deleting a vandal's version of my page, and for explaining what happened.TVC 15 (talk) 07:45, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Pedrovip's images

You may have noticed my question to him over on his talk page. Status today is that none of his images really pan out. I've been told the "Come Back to Me" cover is Australian, but I haven't been able to verify it. The site he downloaded it from shows calls it "propaganda", Portuguese for "advertisement". The Headstrong image looks completely fake. No traces of his "Japanese" cover for Sneakernight, either. I was going to give him a couple more days of ignoring my question before going further. I have a vague and completely unjustifiable suspicion that MSoldi and Pedrovip are the same editor.—Kww(talk) 01:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Conversation is progressing, and probably worth monitoring. I found a few more violations, and he has started to put copyrighted images in userboxes.—Kww(talk) 16:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, it seems apparent that he isn't going to admit wrongdoing. That's a shame ... I feel a lot better about cases like this when I can get the editor to understand what he did wrong and have him request deletion. Do you think it's obvious enough that you can directly delete the other images, or should I go through IFD on them?—Kww(talk) 02:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

IFD it is then: if they were real, they would be acceptable as fair use. The problem is that they are hoaxes. What I don't know for certain is if Pedrovip is constructing the hoax images, or if he just blindly downloads fanart without showing proper judgement.—Kww(talk) 02:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

eNom

Hi C. Fred, would appreciate specific comment on the "citations needed" flag on eNom. Based on your comment on the "wikify" flag it sounds like you'll be okay with "citations" disappearing, but for the benefit of our respawned friend it would be helpful to have it explicit. Thanks, Thirdbeach (talk) 17:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Renewed the checkuser for SpamSurgeon, who appears to be the blocked editor KillAllSpammers/TeerGrub/laundry list of IPs. Would still appreciate your input on "Citations Needed" flag. Thirdbeach (talk) 20:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your input on "Wikify". My response on eNom talk page. Would still greatly appreciate your input on "Citations Needed". Best, Thirdbeach (talk) 23:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Season 3

I know those are the official plots, but those are copyrighted, so we can't post the WHOLE plot. So please don't edit my short summaries. I know those are official, but I got in trouble for posting the WHOLE plot, so I'm going to just post a little bit of the plot. Thanks :D. - Alec2011 (talk) 00:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MuBetaPsiCrest.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:MuBetaPsiCrest.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Preferred?

Your recent edit to the infobox at Jack Weil suggested a couple of related but conceptually distinct questions:

1. Why is automatic formatting better in this instance?
2. Why shouldn't United States be removed from this infobox?

Just wondering ...? --Tenmei (talk) 13:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Revert on Chris Heimerdinger article.

Hi, you recently reverted and installed four tags on the Chris Heimerdinger article. Would you be so kind as to point out which of the 15 or so sentences in this completely rewritten article you feel are needing attention according to these tags? Thank you for your time.76.238.22.59 (talk) 22:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi again, I really do need to know which of those 15 or so sentences fits any one of those tags you've applied to the page. Peacock Words, Verification, Advertisement and Notability. If you'll notice the entire article was rewritten and brought down to those dozen+ sentences, with nine supporting references. Sundance Institute award winner, Director of a major motion picture, author published by Ballantine Books, named top 10 LDS writer, etc etc. If you would care to support why you've tagged the article I can begin to address your concerns. As it stands now I have no idea what you've tagged the article for.76.238.22.59 (talk) 01:59, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

I retagged the article because, in response to your concerns when you untagged, Ronz had laid out his concerns on his talk page—and nobody had replied to that. —C.Fred (talk) 02:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Actually they did. Repeatedly. You'll notice that the vast majority of Ronz edits on the talk page are him moving text around, changing other editors post locations, creating and deleting sections AFTER discussion has taken place, etc...

It's incumbent on you when placing a tag or editing an article to make an informed decision regarding your edits. That is why I've asked you to support your tagging the article as Peacock Words, Verification, Advertisement and Notability. Ronz has actually placed the same tags on a number of related LDS wiki articles. I have no dog in this fight, I don't think I've ever even met a Mormon - I've simply responded to the tags Ronz put there by adding 9 refs and whittling the article down to around 15+ sentences. It's not a great article, but there is no basis at this time for those 4 tags. May I revert your tags? Absent anyone supporting their tags or indicating what exactly they're tagging I believe they have outlived their applicability and should be removed. I only ask that you support or withdraw your edit.76.238.22.59 (talk) 02:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

And at this point, there has been discussion on the talk page. So, the last time I looked—after FireandFlames removed tags and added discussion to the talk page—I felt the tags or lack thereof were in agreement with the progress of discussion on the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 02:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for lifting your tags for the moment, I really am just trying to work together with all.76.238.22.59 (talk) 03:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi Fred, I dropped the tags back on as it seems like there is some edit warring going on without anybody (save Ronz it appears) to be discussing on the talk page. I have made some suggestions to the IP on my talk. FWIW, I recommend that the IP make a new section in the talk stating that he is going to remove the tags as it seems that consensus has been achieved in the next few days. It's not going to kill anybody if the tags stay up there for a few more days. Ta Shot info (talk) 03:19, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

I have opened a section on removing the tags on the Heimdinger talk page. I intend to remove them in 36 hours if no one is willing or able to support the tags with specifics.76.238.22.59 (talk) 03:31, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Minimum age to edit Wikipedia?

Hi Fred, is there a minimum age to edit Wikipedia? I thought that I had seen one for having a registered account but now I can't seem to find it. Specifically, a twelve year old editor? Cheers,⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 19:40, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for checking for me. I tried looking all over the place and was frustrated because I thought that I had seen it before. I encountered this user and it appears that she badgers this one. I didn't realize until after my last warning that I'm addressing a 12 year old which goes a long way in explaining her actions...before she just looked trollish. I have a funny feeling that she will be at ANI before too long for being troublesome although I hope not.⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 21:25, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Notice: AN/I

To Andycjp and others who might be interested. (In your case, you blocked him once.) This notice is being sent to inform you that Andycjp’s disruptive editing has been reported at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (AN/I): [17].

-- Hordaland (talk) 20:23, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Pedrovip

FYI:Final warning placed on his talk page.—Kww(talk) 16:02, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Wsx7631

You better protect his page; little chimp'll be doing that forever, otherwise... 04:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

User Name Request

When do you think my username request will go through?--Michaelaltieri (talk) 17:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

thx for the prompt response darling--Michaelaltieri (talk) 00:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Amy Lee

Thanks for the backup over there...I'm not fathoming why folks feel so strongly that "harp" belongs there. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 21:58, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Loops

Yeah, I know what you're saying C.Fred. I often think the sub-categories can equally apply both ways. I think they are valuable as a 'see also' marker too. Noriko1456 (talk) 11:52, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

AS4

Fred, I am actively working on this new page I just created about AS4. Please allow me some time to complete the work before being considered for deletion. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by BoltProspect (talk • contribs) 02:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

An edit you made roughly two weeks ago

Hi fred, you made an edit to the ICP page "The amazing Jeckel Bros." deleting the section containing the message behind the album. I understand your reasoning behind this, however the message of the album is important enough to where it shold be in the article, so i undid that revision, and made another one so that it is in a format of a lengthy quote (the same format used in research papers, centered and in quotes, with slightly smaller font). Since the article is set up with every thing properly cited, just as it is in a research paper, i fail to see why this would not be acceptable rather than deleting the section, if you have a reason why feel free to go to my talk page and tell me (if i have it set up. otherwise, ill just be sure to check back here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mastermarth (talk • contribs) 22:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Ah yes i see what you mean. But the amazing jeckel brotheres is no the only page which uses the albums message in the article. is there a reason why only it required removal? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mastermarth (talk • contribs) 23:58, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

City in infobox

"(cur) (last) 22:09, 26 October 2008 C.Fred (Talk | contribs | block) (35,888 bytes) (Undid revision 247854192 by WhisperToMe (talk) - unincorporated DeKalb still uninc - nearest *city* is Atlanta) (rollback | undo)"

The point is to say it is not in Atlanta. The "city" field should either say "near" (Didn't the editors of the article agree to have "near" in the infobox) in it, at the least. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

more Luis Jacinto edits

I thought you'd want to know, User:Luislovejoe has other unhelpful edits. --Clubmarx (talk) 04:06, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia

There is some technical problem at Wikipedia article, its vandalised and I couldn't revert it. Cluebot reverted but vandalism is still showing up. - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 16:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

You don't see the vandalism? The whole page has been replaced with "A LOAD OF CRAP". See the discussion here. - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 16:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Try a hard-refresh. The page was vandalized seven minutes ago and instantly reverted by ClueBot. Tan | 39 16:42, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't know what I'm doing wrong. I logged out of wikipedia, in firefox Tools>Clear Private data, checked All the boxes, hit ok, restarted firefox and I still see the same thing. - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 16:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Ctrl-F5 in firefox. Tan | 39 16:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Didn't work:( Might be something to do with my ISP's cache. - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 16:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of NSTO page

Hi, I was the person who recently made a page about the national soccer tennis organization which was deleted for no apparent reason. It is a real league that is newly created and I feel disrespected seeing it was deleted as we are just trying to establish the league. If it could be put up asap that would be great. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NSTO2468 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Olpran Speedy deletion

Hi Fred

I am the announcer of article about Olpran Co. It was deleted due to reason it didnt indicated any significancy or importance tho it is the one of the first companies that started to sell bicycles for common users in Czech Republic with long radition this is where i see the importance. I will try to mention it in the article if its enough just let me know as soon as possible. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by JenkyDudl (talk • contribs) 16:13, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Question

Just wondering if you're from the Tehachapi area? If so, you can help me because I made a page for Monroe. It's Monroe High School (Tehachapi). You can help me, if you know, or want to put a little bit more in there. Figured there needed to be something about our only continuation high school--JoeCool950 (talk) 00:17, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

SpamSurgeon/KillAllSpammers

Hi C.Fred, thank you very much for your vigilance on eNom and the timely block. Didn't know you're an admin but since you are ... did you check whether SpamSurgeon is a sockpuppet of KillAllSpammers? If so, I've already got a request for checkuser submitted for SpamSurgeon and, more importantly, for another apparent sockpuppet that's essentially an impersonation of a living person, an innocent bystander misidentified as me. If I understand correctly, using new sockpuppets as a means to avoid blocks is basis for indefinite blocking, is that accurate? Thanks, Thirdbeach (talk) 17:53, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the perspective -- what a nuisance to have to spend so much time defending against bad faith. I'll wait for the checkuser check. Thirdbeach (talk) 17:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

At the risk of being repetitive, thanks for being watchful ... again ... yesterday evening. Thirdbeach (talk) 18:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Pedrovip

I don't mean to say that knowing these things isn't important. I just worry about young Pedro's enthusiasm for blocking and rules without a corresponding emphasis on learning how to make good edits. He's gotten much better than when he started, but he skated pretty close to getting an indefinite block on his account, and would certainly have gotten one if he hadn't improved. I think it's important to encourage him to make good edits, and he can focus on trying to enforce rules after he's demonstrated that he can follow them himself.—Kww(talk) 16:48, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

My response to that (Pedrovip)

Hey, in the article Circus (Britney Spears album), they written "while promoting her book". She doesn't written a book? This is not a book. I reverted it. Pedrovip (talk) 16:53, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Pedrovip

Oh, almost forgotten, i say thanks to this.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedrovip (talk • contribs) 16:53, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

To Mr C.Fred.

Ok, you're willing to talk now I see. I see that you deleted a page for the BWM a while ago. Why would you do that? Really? I mean come on, they were on the news & you just deleted it. By the way, is fred your first name or last name? and what does c stand for? Nice talking to you, mr c:fred. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phantom Messer (talk • contribs) 09:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

To Mr. C. Fred

This is Bill Jetter here, look, my article of Hal Baxter is not an attack article nor is it vandalism. It is an article about a real person. If you don't like it I'm sorry. If you wrote an article I thought was nonsense I would NOT erase it so I expect the same respect from you. And FYI, this is NOT vandalism and neither is my article of Hal Baxter. So after this just please leave me alone and I will do the same for you. Thank you very much for your time and understanding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bill Jetter (talk • contribs) 01:11, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

User talk:WeaverAndrew

Please protect User talk:WeaverAndrew and revert all edits by WeaverAndrew. The edits to that page by that user were nothing more than an attempt to hide warnings given. -- IRP ☎ 18:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Just for you

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:BADCHART&action=history

—Kww(talk) 15:12, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the HSM3 soundtrack

Ummmm...."C.Fred" listen. I didn't mean to make you like angry or anything. I just keep adding the "High School Musical 3:___ Soundtrack" just so the article has the full proper name. Besides, I'm new to Wikipedia and I don't know really know how it works (I hope this message gets to you....). Yeah, again, sorry if I upseted you or something (reply to my talk when done reading) (-user:Ashfreak261) 02:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: Louie-p and G4

Thanks for letting me know. I think I caught myself putting the wrong template on the article only after the edit was made. TheLetterM (talk) 01:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Indef block

Why did you indefinitely block User:WeaverAndrew? -- IRP ☎ 01:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: South Carolina Federal Credit Union

Thanks, C. Fred. Very clear explanation. I can certainly meet those requirements. I appreciate your quick feedback.

Navy Midshipmen football results

I just wanted to say that was an excellent job you did with splitting the yearly records into decade groups. I am humbled that I did not think of it earlier. :) Msr iaidoka (talk) 05:29, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

I second that! Thanks!--96.244.127.187 (talk) 01:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

South Carolina Federal Credit Union

I attempted to start a new page, "South Carolina Federal Credit Union," today and saw that you previously deleted a page by this name, citing "Blatant copyright violation." I wondered if I possibly could have access to the deleted content, since I don't know who else was authorized to create content and doubt that the deleted material was generated by such a person. Please respond. Thanks for your time.

Wordbiologist, 11/13/08 ~ ~ ~ ~ 20:55, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Ashfreak261

Just wanted to be sure you were aware of the expanding horizons of this problem.—Kww(talk) 18:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

I have you know I find this really offensive! I'm not making problems. I'm just trying to bring Wikipedia to its full potiential..... -Ashfreak261 (talk) 03:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Ashfreak261

A question

Hey, not sure if you are right person, but you are admin so I will ask you. Can you please do something about Montenegrin related articles on Wikipedia. On every page Serbs edit it and put "Serbian" language, even though official language is Montenegrin, and not Serbian. Can you please help us, as there is no limit of Serbian aggression, even on Wikipedia. And it will show that Wikipedia respects every country constitution. Thanks for reading, I hope I will get answer from you.

Best regards, Rave92

Rave92 (talk) 13:01, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

CREE website

Hi. Could you let me know the exact procecure I need to follow to get teh CREE wiki page up and running. CREE is a NGO based out of teh US which has been working with a few friends of mine to help out rural people. I tried to create a page for their organization as such organisations need to be listed on the wiki. Please let me know what steps I need to follow to get it up and running and I will comply. Thanks. inabox76 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inabox76 (talk • contribs) 04:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

FROM: Ashfreak261. A BIG thank you :)!

Listen, I know we have had some problems when we first met, but I just want to say thanks for all you are doing help me. I know it sounds mushy-gushy now, but so far, you are the only person that has helped me in Wikipedia. So, thanks again. I hope we don't have any edit wars between us :). (please reply to this message ^_^) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashfreak261 (talk • contribs) 07:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Ciarán Lewis

Prof. Lewis is not a member of the faculty of my college. I do not attend QUB and as he is head of department at QUB, he deserves an article about him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stmalachyscollege (talk • contribs) 12:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Kudos :3

Hi, just a quick thanks for dealing with Keith Ralph so quickly. I was starting to get frustrated with the constant reverts and abusive behaviour (though I've been exposed to plenty in the past when I used to be a moderator elsewhere), so I appreciate an admin stepping in and dealing with the problem. :) --Gravecat (talk) 12:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

KillAllSpammers is back

Hi C.Fred, looks like KillAllSpammers returned as soon as your semi-protect on eNom expired. Edits have expanded to include both POV flag and content. If you think the activity meets the threshold for a new semi-protect it'd be great. Thanks, Thirdbeach (talk) 21:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Second has arrived. I'll undo. Thanks in advance for the semi-protect. Thirdbeach (talk) 22:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Is "thanks in simultaneity" a real phrase? :-D Thirdbeach (talk) 22:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Renaissance 2.0 deleted

Hi C.Fred, I am the author of "Renaissance 2.0". Thank you for your message. It's true that it is a direct copy of a column published on the Internet, but I asked permission directly to the author. It is not enough? Sorry for my bad English, please answer me. Thank you Zoojo (talk) 13:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Microsoft Live Labs Photosynth

Hi again! I saw you've also deleted my contribution on Microsoft Live Labs Photosynth. Let me know which part of my contribution carry a non-neutral point of view. Thank you again Zoojo (talk) 14:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your replies. I will reflect on my mistakes! Zoojo (talk) 19:07, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

True Love Waits

This is Rtbyrd. I wanted to let you know I am working on this article for an assignment for a Sociology class on Social Movements. I have not finished the editing and plan to include criticisms as well as other sources. However is it not legitimate to use the history from the organizations site? I see no issue with this. Please do not delete all of my work as part of my assignment is for my professor to be able to view my edits. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rtbyrd (talk • contribs) 05:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

List of television stations in North America by media market

I thought I would bring this to your attention and let you decide how you want to deal with it. After the 24 hour protection was up on List of television stations in North America by media market, Theaveng reverted to Nielsen based changes in violation of the OTRS ticket (#2008091610055854). Emarsee reverted asking in his edit summary that "Theaveng" "stop being so disruptive" and requested continued page protection on WP:RFPP (which, as of this post, hasn't happened).

I will not get in the middle of this and will not template "Theaveng", so as not to escalate the situation, but I thought you should be made aware of what is going on. Take Care and Enjoy Your Weekend...NeutralHomer • Talk • November 22, 2008 @ 08:10 08:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Cryokinesis

Thank you for your help with the article Cryokinesis all me Articles get delted but we still need to fight back. C.JD 03:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

The resson for it being so short is well the fact that im working on it and i always save so I wont lose any informatin then when i get more information i just add itC.JD 03:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cryptod (talk • contribs)

Hi

Hi C.Fred, can you move The Offspring: Complete Music Video Collection to Complete Music Video Collection?

See the history of The Offspring: Complete Music Video Collection, is more relevant. And the correct is only Complete Music Video Collection.

Thanks.

OffsBlink (talk) 17:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

yeah, the article needed to be moved because the history of The Offspring: Complete Music Video Collection was more relevant and the correct name is Complete Music Video Collection.

Thank you very much C.Fred.

OffsBlink (talk) 17:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

two kinds of dash

There's one kind of dash and there's another kind of dash. There are two kinds of dash. Why is "dash" suddenly pluralised when there's more than one kind of it? What is the necessary parralellism you're referring to? Tony (talk) 04:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

You're right; I failed to see the larger context. Tony (talk) 08:10, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Sounds as though your input at MoS talk would be valuable. Do drop in some time. Tony (talk) 12:38, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Saucemouth

Hi C.Fred, I thought the article was a repost, based on this: [18]. Maybe it had an entirely different text in its previous incarnation; if so, I made an errant assumption. Thanks, JNW (talk) 03:14, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. JNW (talk) 03:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Blanking

Why did you blank this user's userpage? Even if it was a copy of the UK article, you could still really piss that person off. Jonathan321 (talk) 15:44, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I was just wondering. Jonathan321 (talk) 15:58, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

I tagged User:Cyrusmilleyhannana as a sock of Nimbley6 (and User:Bennet556), and I've just tagged User:United Kingdom & Northern Ireland as a sock of same. Nimbley6 is a long-term troll and socker with a fascination for Scottish topics, images (particularly flags and coats of arms) and sub-headings.

However, that's not why I'm here! It occurred to me that I've got country articles in my userspace - User:This flag once was red/sandbox2 and User:This flag once was red/sandbox3, and I wondered if it was appropriate? I created the two sandbox pages to test a modification to the Country infobox; I don't particularly need them any more, but was curious about the "legality" of it. So... is it inappropriate to have copies of articles in user space? (I'm just curious - I'll probably delete the two sandbox pages shortly anyway).

Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 18:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks - that makes sense! Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 19:11, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

NCAA/ACC/Miami

Good catch on the 1984 Women's golf championship. I appreciate your excellent contributions to ACC-related articles. Fletch81 (talk) 22:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry about the Vandalism buddy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yung D the Prince (talk • contribs) 23:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

GridGain

Bah. I wish I had had the time to document the copyright violations better at the beginning. Oh well.

I think the article may be salvageable, but I'm concerned about the SPA/COI editor. I'm ready to take it to WP:COIN. Your further thoughts on the situation would be appreciated. --Ronz (talk) 03:17, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Different Beat

An article that you have been involved in editing, Different Beat, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Different Beat. Thank you. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 14:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

The result was speedy-delete:Vandalism/bad-faith contribution. For anyone else watching this thread, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Different Beat and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing To A Different Beat. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 19:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Holophyly

Are you going to be consistent and revert Consists=Mats Envall's edits of Holophyly too?? Plantsurfer (talk) 20:24, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Two Ton Boa

Hi C.Fred. You deleted this article, yet this this this this and this would suggest that this is not an uncontroversial deletion. Also, having a notable member and having a notable band cover one of their songs are reasonable assertions of importance, in my view – at least to avoid a speedy. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Apeiron Centre

Hello, you recently deleted with the argument of non-notability an article on a launched philosophical organization called Apeiron Centre. How is it possible for a new and innovative organization, which by definition is non-evident and non-notable, to have access to the wikipedia ? May you please reconsider your decision and restore the deleted article ? Thank You. Ion —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ion.sotiropoulos (talk • contribs) 12:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Amalgam Digital

I am not sure if I am doing this correctly, but I am requesting the page for Amalgam Digital be reopened for editing. It was deleted, but I would like to add references and edit the entry to take out any sort of blatant self advertising. Please instruct. Nancedw (talk) 23:17, 21 December 2008 (UTC)12/21/2208

Thank You, I will attempt to do so. I'm very new at this, so how will I have this reviewed by appropriate editors?

Nancedw (talk) 03:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 12/21/208

I have entered some information on the Amalgam Digital page from my username. I was also wondering how I might refer to magazine articles as there is more information available, but they are in print media, many of the issues are subscription based online and I cannot provide a valid link. Can I scan them and save them somewhere to be referenced. This is the first time I have attempted to create a wiki page, so it's a slow process for me. Thanks! Nancedw (talk) 21:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Video Profiling

Hi, I own the copyright for the website www.videoprofiling.co.uk and I have e-mailed Wikipedia re: permitting re-use under the GFDL. Whilst the Video Profiling article does relate back to my website I am trying to explain the concept of Video Profiling in the broader sense of sharing A/V information and how it is used in a variety of professional markets. I then go to explain how www.vidoprofiling.co.uk uses Video Profiling technology as an example. Thank you VideoProfiling (talk) 15:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

We have a valid GFDL release on the OTRS at Ticket:2009010310007835, but I haven't undeleted this as you also mentioned G11 (spam) as a reason for deletion. I'll leave it to you as the deleting admin as to what to do. Stifle (talk) 15:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Looks OK to me now. It was the way it led to their link that made me flag it. Apart from the BBC reported item, it's hard to find any other players in the game. (They'll all be at it in six months....) I'm wondering about their site going in as an External Link - now the article has been revised? Leaving it to you - you've far more experience than me. (I flag things and watch to see what happens. Learn quite a lot that way. I don't use any tools, preferring to find the ones they don't (including a copyviol in Greek!) I do copy-eds too, and defend some things slated for deletion.) Peridon (talk) 18:09, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

List of television stations in North America by media market

Thank you! I don't know if my instant reverts were right or not, with the OTRS ticket, I know we can't have Nielsen information. Could I have handled that situation differently? - NeutralHomer • Talk • November 20, 2008 @ 12:44

Thanks....I will participate in the discussion and will try to stay away from problems like these in the future. One problem I do have. About 10 minutes ago, the little orange bar popped up and I thought I recieved a message from Pedro. This was what I seen. Not the history part, just the diff. Had I seen it from the history point-of-view, I would have know it wasn't actually from Pedro. Pedro had placed the same warning on Theaveng's talk page a couple moments earlier. I am not sure if there is something that can be said about not trying to "impersonate" another user, but it should. I will be more careful before editing to someone (as I sent a message to Pedro before realizing what was going on). - NeutralHomer • Talk • November 20, 2008 @ 13:03

Best wishes for the holiday season

Ecoleetage (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

A contest you may be interested in

Hello, C.Fred. There is a new contest for U.S. and Canada roads that you may be interested in. To sign up or for more information, please visit User:Rschen7754/USRDCRWPCup. The contest begins Saturday at 00:00 UTC. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 04:07, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Zeta Phi Beta

I noticed you reverted the recent edit I made to the Zeta Phi Beta article. I think changing the section header from "Controversies" may help to eliminate some of the constant removal of the section. If it is instead presented as a part of the historical timeline it may be a little easier for the members of Zeta to accept. The alternative is to make it into a triva box, but I think that will minimize the events too much. I welcome your thoughts. -- Absolon S. Kent (talk) 18:21, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Diamond Way and Ole Nydahl pages

The consensus version was agreed upon by all and had been stable for quite some time, but Siru108 keeps replacing the consensus, neutral version with the copied almost directly from the title of the article's official website, thus making it very one-sided and not using third party sources. Peter Robinson Scott (talk) 19:39, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Article Deletion

Hmm....As I was using Huggle, it said that it would speedy delete, as the last contributer was the author. I had not idea that it would do that...my apologies. Next time, I'll just use Twinkle; thanks for the heads up! Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 19:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Delta lodge

I have provided a neutral and factually backed addendum to the delta lodge page..... However i find my slef under due arrest. It seems every time i edit i get deleted, i just feel that if your going to provide a nuetral and objective explanation of the subject you should include all facts, as i have and provded sources. I also concur wi the sentiment that the delta lodge subject matter is not notable seing as how they are a defunct organization (not in good standing at the university of north texas... this organization is not mandated by any governing body. The statement that they are a "fraternity in good standing at the university of north texas is fraudulent. They posses no charter/mandate; they hold sparse residence at best, and were relocated by the city due to alarming concerns. To reiterate i fing the delta lodge page to be an apologists rendition with not factual evidence to back it up... it contains claims that are unfound and jingoistic at best. If one is to present subject matter with the confines of an encylopedic medium, one would hope that all facts are heralded not just the self promoting smarmy dialoge of advertisers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeltaLodgeDown (talk • contribs) 21:54, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Contested page - Can you help?

Hi - I noticed on the wiki page of my notable colleague ( Lofty Wiseman - a globally known authority on Survival ) that a link appeared to a page about our organisation - Trueways Survival. As the page didn't exist I created one to give information on what we do from a purely factual point of view. We are driven and focused on providing free advice for the purpose of saving lives. It appears that you deleted the page as their may be a conflict of interest with myself writing the and being part of the organisation. I therefore ask, to be unbiased and to allow for the inclusion of information on the lifesaving work we do, would you be willing to compose the page if we provide you with any information you may need to do so? If so, please email me at ' lyndon at truewayssurvival dot com'. Thank you for reading.

I have the user some advice on his talk page. MickMacNee (talk) 20:11, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Your talk page is too busy to keep watched so if you had anything to add, let me know on mine. Cheers. MickMacNee (talk) 03:44, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

D&J

Hey, on the Drake And Josh article I noticed you changed the episode count from 64 to 63. Which is correct? By the info on the page it should be 64, but it originally had 63. Can you explain?--D3t3ctiv3 (talk) 03:03, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

I replied to you on my talk page. :) --D3t3ctiv3 (talk) 03:14, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

?D3t3ctiv3 (talk) 02:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Example on my page. You should check regularly, Im on right now.D3t3ctiv3 (talk) 04:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Amalgam Digital

I posted on your talk page on about the status of Amalgam Digital where you stated I could start a new article under my name and did so User:Nancedw/Amalgam_Digital There is much to be done, I am just making sure this is how the article should be, and I am wondering how to cite sources in print media that is not properly documented online. Thank you Nancedw (talk) 21:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of colin paterson page

Please read the talk page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kernel geek (talk • contribs) 17:39, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

You deleted my article titled LTC (Lightning the Cape Verdean). The article was about the artists album, just like a writer's book.

The reason that you gave me is listed below:

"An article about a real person, an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. A7 applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people and organizations themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software and so on. A7 does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source. If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion."

The reason you gave me Proves my point, "A7 applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people and organizations themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software and so on". Once again the article was about the artists new album. If I need to make changes to the article to make more suitable I will but please reinstate my article? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adepina (talk • contribs) 07:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

13: Fear is Real (film)

How did you figure BLP applied to the cast list here? Unless a good case is made for its retention, the article would be gone within 5 days anyway, and a cast list is not a good example of potentially damaging information that would require immediate removal. - Mgm|^(talk) 22:42, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Diamond Way Buddhism

Hallo. I feel a little silly explaining all changes on this page in the discussion, as the user(s) whom opposed my views have all been blocked permanently now. Nobody will disagree now. However I think the semi-protection is still needed, as the puppeteer is likely to create yet another sockpuppet. Is it ok if I just edit the article, or how should I behave? Siru108 (talk) 18:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

MakeMyTrip

Hi Fred, I know that you are busy so there is no great rush with this. Is the use of an Alacrastore link such as this appropriate? I believe it fails WP:ELNO but the user is wanting to add to the notability. I searched for the use of Alacrastore within Wikipedia here and found that the vast majority of these links seem to have been placed by the same user. My talk page has our conversation (see also Talk:MakeMyTrip#Alacrastore). I see both sides of the coin here and looking for further input..your help is greatly appreciated. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 18:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Chaldean Christians

I have added 24 academic sources to this article to stop this edit warring. Feel free to look them over, and also please watch the page so it does not get vandalized again. I have hundreds of other sources if need be, but this is good for now. Thanks, and Best Regards Ninevite (talk) 01:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Early close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Snyder

Thanks for letting me know - you're right, that wasn't the correct rationale. I've changed it. (And that, Graymornings, is why we have admins... :-) Graymornings_(talk) 02:11, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

GaGa

Def Jam is NOT Lady GaGa's record label(s), she was dropped. So please do not keep adding it on to her labels. Dance-pop (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 22:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC).

That is right but you needed specify she was dropped. That is why you were wrong. You need to specify she was dropped, so not to confuse people. And Streamline is one of her record labels I have given a source and for cherrytree records. So could you please change those.Dance-pop (talk) 03:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey, excuse my intrusion, but I think you should take a look here, specifically here.

"Label
The record label or labels to which the act has been signed, as a comma-separated list. Omit parenthetical dates; save that information for the main article. [...]"

I think you will have no further problems with this assunt if you read it. Sparks Fly 22:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

DRV on Cherryade

You might be interested. Thanks, Majorly talk 21:19, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

YesOn8

I saw that you 24h blocked User:YesOn8, and I was wondering what your opinion was on username-blocking that account. Seems like this is a reference to California's Proposition 8. Therefore, it seems to be a promotional name related to a political stance (not a group or company, per se). Because of how this proposition, and politics in general, are polarizing, it seems like, while maybe not strictly "offensive", it would fall under "making harmonious editing difficult" or disruptive. (therefore there are 2 independent lines of reasoning related to the spirit of WP:IU) I was real close to simply soft blocking myself, but I also wasn't sure if it was possible to do that with the 24h block instated, and I didn't want to second guess your admin actions in this situation without seeking your council first.-Andrew c ^[talk] 15:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Ole Nydahl

Siru108 is a POV pusher and troll, please do not encourage him, as it will just make his constant vandalism worse. DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.153.41 (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

First edit from an IP? Now, why would somebody need to hop IPs unless they're up to no good. I'm thinking this is the same editor as User:81.98.176.218, whom I very nearly blocked for 3RR violation. —C.Fred (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you for you assistance with user:Thevandaminator, and his repeated removals of the speedy tags. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 21:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest

Why does my page say I have a conflict of interest and may need to be rewritten?Run4ron (talk) 05:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

this information is not intended to be used as campaign literature as you implied. It is informational and the references are third party references that have been verified and we feel are reliable —Preceding unsigned comment added by Run4ron (talk • contribs) 05:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Diamond Way Buddhism (again)

Hi. Can I request you put the semi-protection back on the Diamond Way Buddhism page? The reason is that the person behind the edits keep creating new accounts, at least with a semi, they cannot edit straight away. Possibly also on Ole Nydahl page, as the problem is the same, with the same edits and same user(s). This person has been active like this since August, I do not expect these edits to stop easily. The only reason it is so very limited right now is that I continue to report the Sock Puppets, and they get blocked again and again. 12 accounts so far are blocked as confirmed Sock Puppets, and 2 more reported. Thank you for your help. Siru108 (talk) 18:29, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Update: 16 confirmed sockpuppets blocked, one IP-user reported. I now that theres not a hell lot of edits right now compared to earlier, but this is mainly because of the blocking it seems. Siru108 (talk) 13:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

There is also a continuing WP:COPYLINK problem. It has been discussed several times, but Roy Ward's unregistered accounts replaces it. [19][20][21]. This can obviously not be solved by blocking the user, as the user just switch IP or create a new account. Siru108 (talk) 14:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)