User talk:MusicBizLady

AfD

I reverted your edits at the AfD. That particular AfD had already run its course, and the result was keep. If you don't agree with the outcome of the debate, then seek another AfD, or if you can find something to demonstrate that the AfD wasn't handled properly, you can take it to deletion review. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 02:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Marina Verenikina

I'm confused. You've requested a deletion review for Marina Verenikina, yet your (improperly added) comments at the AfD page talk about "reinstatement" of the article.

~~Why, exactly, do you think the Verenikina article should be deleted?~~ What was the procedural error in the deletion discussion? —C.Fred (talk) 03:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the {{Delrev}} tag from the top of the article because you never completed the listing at Wikipedia:Deletion review. That's what I'm waiting for, is the listing there. —C.Fred (talk) 03:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, since you're requesting deletion review, the key question is, what was the procedural error that caused the article to be wrongly kept? I don't see anything in the process that broke down.

Finally, I point out an essay: Wikipedia:Other stuff exists. —C.Fred (talk) 04:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your messages

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! Stifle (talk) 09:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry about the missing signature thingie, but that typewriter key does NOT work on my computer, trying to have it fixed.

Anyway, mission accomplished, I scammed those other Wiki editors into assuring my unsigned music artists listings will never be challenged nor removed again, no matter who objects. They are now completely untouchable. lol lol The secret is this: you only need object strongly, "loudly," and hysterically to a Wiki editor's ruling and they always unite together to do the exact opposite of your objection. lol lol lol I learned that lesson a long time ago and, of course, applied it ever since. The best thing is this: once Wiki editors make any formal dispute ruling they never revoke it either lol lol lol When it comes to understanding reverse psychology, well, sweetie, that was my major in college and I am THE expert lol lol lol And that's how you make the big $$$$ in the music biz, my darling---- it's called big time SMARTS, and I got them and then some, that's why my clients love me. lol lol

!MusicBizLady —Preceding comment was added at 10:41, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

As an alternative to the signature button you can type ~~~~.

Regarding the rest of your message, I must confess that I have not the slightest idea what you are talking about. Stifle (talk) 22:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All I'm saying, stifle my sweet, is that the most certain manner to ensure Wikipeea never removes a listing is to INSIST upon its removal and attack the editors who support it. Then like trained Skinner rats, they band together, circle the wagons, and defend the listing until the day they die lol lol Done it before and it works like a charm. The artists I've attacked will never be removed and never be tagged again, I promise you that lol lol I got that bit of advice from a fellow who once worked as an active editor here and then left in disgust in a bitter disagreement with the guy who set up this whole internet thingie. He told me the secret to ensuring listings will never be challenged, no matter how less than notable or dumb they might be, and so far he's been 100% correct lol lol

MusicBizLady (nowiki)