Jump to content

User talk:Brihaspati/Archives/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Vivek Agnihotri

Please notice the correct way to fix the controversy section problem. If you had followed what others have done to fix the problem, the dispute might not have arisen in the first place. Hope you will see how others had fixed it and act in similar way at other places where you encounter a CSECTION--DBigXrayᗙ 10:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

DBigXray please understand time when I changed title controversy to reception. 3 November. This was the time around when subject gave call to wash out his bio and one user named Abhijeet Safai was topic banned by Admin. I didn’t want to take chance and nobody had reverted my edit even. I cooled down and went for t/p consensus over word right winger. — Harshil want to talk? 10:40, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
I am not talking about other things, I am only discussing correct way to deal with controversy section. In your diff edit summary you have stated C SECTION, but did not fully do what was said in the essay. You merely renamed it when there was a better way to fix it. The problem with renaming is obvious, folks may not agree with your rename, claiming controversy represents it in a better way rather then another word you are trying to use there. CSECTION, is not just about renaming the section, it is about merges as well that you missed. Hope I am clear this time. regards.
Where did he make such a call ? You can post the link if you have it. I feel that it is a good idea to add a section on the talk page to alert the talk page watchers to be ready to deal with it, if such calls are publicly made--DBigXrayᗙ 10:50, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
@DBigXray: The subject himself is making such calls repeatedly to whitewash his biography of Wikipedia and negative things from Twitter account. Here, here and here. This has been repeatedly happened and I didn't want to take any chances of TBAN or anything, already there were long t/p threads, ergo, I did one change and then I went for t/p consensus for matter which seemed negative for me.-- Harshil want to talk? 11:16, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Harshil169, Your diff is dated 3 November, I started this thread to point this out to you so that you can address in a better way, the edit that you did on 3 November. you were reverted on 24 th the same day itself. After getting reverted obviously your next step will be to start a discussion that you did on 25 November after 3 weeks time. You could have started this thread on the same day when you were reverted. If you keep doing what you did on 3 November, you risk getting reverted again and again, so follow the correct way to deal with it and you may have a better chance of not getting reverted. As for TBANs, they are handed for your own acts, not just based on what others say. As long as you are not editing in an inappropriate manner, no one can get you TBAN. And WP:NPA also comes in that. DBigXrayᗙ 11:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC) edited on 11:47, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
DBigXray you were reverted on the same day itself. not really. Winged thanked me for it and he changed it again on 25 November. Hope it clarifies. -_ Harshil want to talk? 11:38, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing, I stand corrected. I have struck my lines, but the rest of my comment still stands. Hope you will agree and note it. --DBigXrayᗙ 11:47, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Repeated use of the word 'Cult'

Information icon Hello, I'm Apollo1203. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Word 'cult' is not uncivil. It is similar to sect. — Harshil want to talk? 17:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
No it isn't. Cult has a lot of negative connotations in English. Sect is similar to the word branch or division. (talk page stalker) –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 17:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Kindly provide differences in which I used word cult directly for you. — Harshil want to talk? 15:39, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Terez S.

Is it enough sources now? shoukld i add this one too? (German) https://www.nikolaus-schmid.ch/post/ich-bin-yusuf-und-das-ist-mein-bruder — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czarek (talk • contribs) 16:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC) "Wikipedia is not everything" hehe, it is — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czarek (talk • contribs) 16:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC) And this source is very authoritative but in Arabic : http://www.wafa.ps/ar_page.aspx?id=FHx6U3a578330806944aFHx6U3 Should I add it? will it fix? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czarek (talk • contribs) 16:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

@Czarek: Wikipedia is not everything is policy. Not every details are for Wikipedia. Read WP:NOTEVERYTHING and sources are not reliable. — Harshil want to talk? 16:25, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
@Harshil169: Thanks for your effort, I'm starting to get the hang of it :) I went over the article, removed some junk, added a reference to a Google Book, and a ref to an article in An-Nahar. Please note that we also have an Al-Quds Al-Arabi ref here and a ref from Wafa. All very solid. An-Nahar article lists her song in their "exceptional must listen to" list, but I didn't mention that so to be more on the safe side. I also found a great in depth review about her song "God of Revolution" in As-Safir [1] but it is in the archive and users can only read part of it without signing up so i didn't add this ref at all.

References

  1. ^ http://assafir.com/Article/339523/Archive

Ramesh Solanki

IMO, Ramesh Solanki will fail notability if went to AFD. He does not fulfil any criteria listed on WP:NPOLITICIAN or WP:POLOUTCOMES. He is just a minor local politician and had coverage for filing cases and leaving a party. Even if he has some news coverage, he will fail becuase he has not held any office. -Nizil (talk) 03:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

@Nizil Shah: Yes, he hasn't held any office yet but per WP:NPOL, Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage. Also, this is certainly not WP:BLP1E. I think significant press coverage in multiple, independent, secondary and reliable sources are enough to pass WP:GNG. Similar page like Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga also exists.-- Harshil want to talk? 03:19, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Solanki is not major local political figure, IMO he is minor figure. Bagga might qualify for deletion as well but he may be considered major local politician because he is party spokesperson. I request you to invite other's opinion on Solanki's notability. -Nizil (talk) 04:46, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Putting tag of notability on page. — Harshil want to talk? 04:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Shubham Mishra

Hi can you explain to me why you have rejected Shubham Mishra articleShub7mishra (talk) 16:19, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Creation of An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States

Thank you so much Harshil169. I really appreciate you moving the draft forward. --PaulThePony (talk) 04:40, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

WT:INDIA

I respect your experience and contributions to the project. In the Morari Bapu talk page, you suggested I familiarize myself with reliable sources from India and linked WT:INDIA. I can't seem to find this list and was hoping you could redirect me to it. Thank you. Moksha88 (talk) 05:10, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

WP:INDAFD lists local reliable sources. If any source is doubtable then taken to WT:INDIA. I mean to write something else.-- Harshil want to talk? 05:28, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Excellent, thank you again. Moksha88 (talk) 05:02, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Please have a look at NPOVN#Morari Bapu. -Nizil (talk) 06:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

New message from DBigXray

Hello, Brihaspati. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Hyderabad gang rape.
Message added 15:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You have not yet replied to my last comment on clarifying your nom. DBigXrayᗙ 15:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Terez Sliman

Hi, I believe I did as requested, could you have a look? Thanks! Czarek (talk) 15:28, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Czarek, let some palestinian or some interested in music check submission. I’m not convinced enough about notability. — Harshil want to talk? 17:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

POVFORK

Do you even understand what a WP:POVFORK means ? I hope you know that just using these abbreviations does not make anyone look smarter. It is the weight of the argument that really matters and not how many abbreviations you added. And inappropriate usage of these abbreviations actually makes one appear as a fool to others. --DBigXrayᗙ 07:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

I know it and I used when article declared 4 accused as culprits and suspected plot at finalised murder plot. — Harshil want to talk? 08:21, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Facepalm Facepalm on the know it all. Well can you explain how that makes the article a POV-FORK ? --DBigXrayᗙ 08:39, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
waiting for a reply. --DBigXrayᗙ 11:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Satyaprakash

Hello! Your submission of Satyaprakash at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:30, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Nom of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Hyderabad gang rape

An IP shared these accolades for the Nom of the AfD --DBigXrayᗙ 10:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

DBigXray, He Ram! IP didn't even know difference between accused and convicted. Harshil want to talk? 10:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
I found the edits summary funny so I shared it . Where does he talk about accused and convicted. I did not get your line above. --DBigXrayᗙ 10:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
DBigXray, S/he told that you guys are worst than rapists. Here, it is not proven that whether rape happened; whether alleged rapists are real or not. That's what I meant. Harshil want to talk? 10:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Oh that way. yes, you are right. Thanks for clarifying. with your response, I suppose you dont support the encounter . --DBigXrayᗙ 10:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
DBigXray, Of course not. We must choose law over lawlessness. But in the country where parliamentarians like Jaya Bacchan and Mimi Chakraborty tell about lynchings in parliament then this was expected. Harshil want to talk? 10:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Glad to hear, I am in complete agreement with you over this thought. In a way this was entirely forced upon by the top level politicians. JB doesn't even deserve to be in RS, what has she done there other than crying, in which of course she is an expert being an actor. Fast track court was already established. It was a good chance to show the world how India respects the rule of law, but now will all these lynchings and state sponsored police lynchings India is looking more of a banana republic. And what if they were innocents ? the CCTV footage was from a far off distance. grainy. Not sure how police can identify any person from that footage. There is a second corpse too that they are investigating.
PS: Your page showed me this quote that i found was quite apt. "Hate the sin, love the sinner. — Mahatma Gandhi" --DBigXrayᗙ 10:22, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
DBigXray, At present my page is showing quote I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent.
— Mahatma Gandhi. Lyching and encounter happen because people don't have faith in system. When we fail to give fair trial to accuse and refuse to listen their side then nothing can be done. I even hear the excuse that they accepted crime but if we look at Murder of Pradyuman Thakur then criminal was someone else and the one who accepted was forced to do so. May God Bless India because politicians and system will not. Harshil want to talk? 10:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Indeed, very apt. Pradyuman case is a perfect example that I use during my discussion with others. Everyone knows that Our police are inept in proper investigation which is why everyone talks about giving case to CBI. instead of doing their job of investigation, they are now trying to become Judge, jury and executioner. This encounter is a big blot on our society. --DBigXrayᗙ 10:48, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
The whole populace seems to be going batshit insane, with an ever-increasing bloodlust. And, TV channels are running evening-polls on whether the encounter was a proper way of meting out justice ..... ∯WBGconverse 13:57, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Indeed, BBC covered the insanity well. Everyone seems to have forgotten that it may very well be them who can face bullets when the inept policemen are looking for the next scapegoat. Only folks like Sengar and Chinmayanand who are higher than law can feel safe that they wont be encountered. I found some solace in Nandy's timeline and this article [1]. As for the Media, they have an agenda to distract from major issues and hard questions, so they are doing their job as usual. --DBigXrayᗙ 14:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Winged Blades of Godric, one Hindi channel was showing caption like Disha ke Darindo ka satyanash. This is just pathetic. Harshil want to talk? 15:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Would you like to withdraw the AfD based on the lates updates ? I think you should. what is the point in wasting time at AfD ? --DBigXrayᗙ 13:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Never mind, an admin already closed it. You should have withdrawn it already. --DBigXrayᗙ 13:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2019 Delhi factory fire

On 9 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Delhi factory fire, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

User talk:Prakash pandey07

Please be wary of posting links that can reveal a Wikipedia editor's real-life identity. Doing so is considered to be a form of harrassment, even if the editor in question needs to disclose a paid relationship. Yunshui 雲水 13:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Yunshui, thanks for drawing my attention. I did so and administrator Yamla had a reason to block editor with one more policy and he didn't object, however, I will take care in future about this. Harshil want to talk? 13:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Rupee Symbol

₹ , here it is. Remember in future if you need the ₹ symbol then you can always copy paste the Rs symbol from elsewhere on the page or internet. Template:INRConvert also adds the symbol, without typing it. My keyboard is 4-5 years old now, but I am glad it has the ₹ symbol on button number 4. ---DBigXrayᗙ 15:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

DBigXray, Hmm but laptop provided to me by CIS-A2K in this november lacks some features. However, it works good and make my wiki work lot easier. Harshil want to talk? 15:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Harshil169, ok. You can always refer to this thread on your talk page archive, if you are looking for one next time. DBigXrayᗙ 15:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Swami Chakrapani

Hello! Your submission of Swami Chakrapani at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello there! :)

Went through thoroughly the one that you sent me :) And yes, I must tell you that the COI won't pertain to me because I do not have a tag or a link with the media house in any way except for the fact that I'm a Bangalore based competative exam cracking STUDENT filling in my NEET Application currently who only keeps a close watch on all news articles and news going on any channel. I've told you my identity openly because the COI Policy asks if I'm associated with or an employee at the Republic Media Network or something. HarshithaHappyGoLucky (talk) 16:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

My only intention was to make you aware of that policy. — Harshil want to talk? 15:23, 10 December 2019 (UTC)


your talk page archive duration

Also your tp archive duration is very aggressive. I suggest you to keep it a week or 5 days at bare minimum. It is unnecessary trouble to unarchive a thread to reply to it.--DBigXrayᗙ 15:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Actually, I don’t like much posts pending on my t/p. I like clean t/p.— Harshil want to talk? 15:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
I understand and I have an aggressive TP archive myself (5 days), but setting the archive for 2 days is very short. You are working in the WP:NPP domain, and other areas where you are more likely to encounter Newbies. If they post here something and come back to see your response, they will believe that you simply removed them. repeated unarchiving will be tiresome. If there are threads that have been resolved and no longer need to be on your talk page, you can get those individual threads archived sooner by adding certain keywords to that thread that archives them immediately. check out the bot script to see how to do that. --DBigXrayᗙ 15:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

[WikiConference India 2020] Invitation to participate in the Community Engagement Survey

This is an invitation to participate in the Community Engagement Survey, which is one of the key requirements for drafting the Conference & Event Grant application for WikiConference India 2020 to the Wikimedia Foundation. The survey will have questions regarding a few demographic details, your experience with Wikimedia, challenges and needs, and your expectations for WCI 2020. The responses will help us to form an initial idea of what is expected out of WCI 2020, and draft the grant application accordingly. Please note that this will not directly influence the specificities of the program, there will be a detailed survey to assess the program needs post-funding decision.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft deleted while editing Kapila Pashu Ahaar

Hi Harshil169 Sir, I copied the history data from the same company only I understood and I won't do it again but I didn't understood how it was promotional which is helpful for farmers. I am new I would appreciate the guidance. Thanks in Advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Govindbangalore (talk • contribs) 13:48, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Please Do not remove the Krishna Mishra page

Hi, Please let me know the objection and issues, this is based upon my first hand research about the person who is selflessly working to heal people around the globe

thanks, K Kkumard (talk) 12:58, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Please do not remove the Sadhguru's guru section

Hi Harshil, I have added official references and added sadhguru's guru, any reason why you have removed it?--Mkt1988 (talk) 08:30, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Please read WP:PRIMARY. We don’t use primary sources more. If there’s some other secondary sources which tells about this then we can add it. Harshil want to talk? 08:52, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Harshil169, Where does it say in WP:PRIMARY that you cannot use the primary source? FYI Mkt1988 DBigXrayᗙ 12:20, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
DBigXray, we can use but generally secondary sources are preferred. And specially when neutrality is disputed we avoid primary sources. Right? Harshil want to talk? 12:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Harshil169, it is not as easy as black and white. It is a grey area. It depends on what are you using to refer it to. Editor discretion comes into picture to decide how harmless or controversial this piece of info is. If you have a secondary source conforming the same, by all means go for it. But when there is no Secondary source, and the info is non controversial, it is ok to use a primary source and attribute the info to the source. DBigXrayᗙ 12:48, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Okay, I’ve no objections now. Harshil want to talk? 13:05, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you DBigXray and Harshil169, I have reverted the article to the change I have made.--Mkt1988 (talk) 17:42, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
I have also added another reference from a book, which is used in Malladihalli Sri Raghavendra Swamiji --Mkt1988 (talk) 17:53, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Mkt1988, ok. Now onwards, Please use the article talk page for discussion about the topic or its sources. This is to make sure that other page editors are also aware of what/why you are doing something. --DBigXrayᗙ 17:58, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Satyaprakash

On 16 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Satyaprakash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an article published in the Satyaprakash weekly, which criticised Hindu religious leaders, resulted in a libel case? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Satyaprakash. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Satyaprakash), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 01:08, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

New message from DBigXray

Hello, Brihaspati. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citizenship (Amendment) Bill protests.
Message added 10:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The recent events have further improved the notability. The nominater has withdrawn the nomination. You might want to review your !vote as well. DBigXrayᗙ 10:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

RFPP

Harshil, I am watching the RFPP page, I have seen multiple failed requests from you on RFPP, can you please familarize yourself with Wikipedia:Protection policy. Article protection prohibits good people from contributing also, so the pros and cons need to be judged. Also see the essay Wikipedia:Make protection requests sparingly--DBigXrayᗙ 13:14, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Harshil, I know you mean well but keep the following in mind: processing a request at RFPP takes time, so a little reminder that (repeated) requests that have to be declined take the time of the admins who are also volunteers like you. In short: one or two instances of vandalism do not necessarily mean that an article has to be protected. Only articles subject to heavy and continued vandalism can (not must!) be semi-protected. The negative effects of semi-protection on discouraging positive contributions should be more of a concern than the positive effect of decreasing vandalism. I have repeatedly pointed you to our protection policy. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 13:50, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Lectonar, there were three instances of Vandalism on the page to which I requested protection. She has been arrested yday and been given custody today. There’ll again rise of vandalism. — Harshil want to talk? 15:03, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
I have seen that...but 3 instances isn't heavy and continued, especially as the page is well watched, and we do not protect preemptively. Your reactions give the impression that you do not really read all the hints you have been left. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 15:07, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Lectonar, I read that it can’t be protected in advance. But vandalism was improving in a day and perhaps, I was the one user watching it. It was BLP, thus, I requested protection. Harshil want to talk? 15:09, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
The page has 45 watchers....Lectonar (talk) 15:14, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Uff... Still nobody was reverting it.— Harshil want to talk? 15:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Harshil169

Thank you for creating Gandhi and Philosophy: On Theological Anti-politics.

User:Winged Blades of Godric, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please see WP:CWW.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Winged Blades of Godric}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

∯WBGconverse 08:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I haven't been following the conversation on the talk page of Divya Dwivedi, but if you could be kind in enough to explain in just a sentence or two on what basis the article was blanked/redirected. Just for curiosity sake. Thanks! DTM (talk) 06:27, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

@DiplomatTesterMan:Please see this edit. This calls this common lecture as royal institute of philosophy lecture. Whole things are filled with this type of puffery. IMHO, book is notable but authors are not. Those who created it were sock accounts and who are edit it are also confirmed sock. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WWorringer. I gave redirect because of persistent sockpuppetry and COI edits. — Harshil want to talk? 06:48, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Now that the article has been created again, I guess the debate of whether it stays or goes will continue. Just one observation, you wrote "I gave redirect because of persistent sockpuppetry and COI edits." This isn't and can't be the reason for redirect as far as I can tell, rather what you initially said about the notability, puffery etc. Thanks for the explanation. DTM (talk) 11:26, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Harshil169, I have reverted your deletion of sourced content. Given that two reliable sources were cited, your explanation is insufficient. Also, you are strongly cautioned that page blanking as you have done is considered to be disruptive editing. If you believe an article should be deleted for not meeting GNG, the correct procedure is to nominate it at AFD for the community to decide.  JGHowes  talk 20:15, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
JGHowes, I’ve reverted your changes because one site is personal blog which doesn’t qualify for RS and another site doesn’t mention about subject. The details were added by sock in a violation of their ban. Harshil want to talk? 01:37, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
The Deccan Chronicle is a reliable source and it specifically mentions her parents, her father's occupation, and where she's from. This information is customarily included in Wikipedia bios, especially if it's sourced, as this is. So that part is back in. If the other site is indeed a personal blog, as you state, I agree with that being removed.  JGHowes  talk 02:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC) [update]--> I've done some more editing in an effort to strike a more neutral tone and generally improve some of the article's stilted language, which gives the impression it was not written by a native English-speaker. But a lot more work to improve the article needs to be done.  JGHowes  talk 13:52, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Reverted edits

Please do not remove reliably-sourced content, as you did here. If any other reliable source contradicts this content, feel free to cite it in the article. Italawar (talk) 12:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Stop this bullshit, please! Wordpress is not WP:RS. Harshil want to talk? 12:46, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
You too, for the same Vinod Chaubey article and other reasons, please do not edit war or post on my talk page. That section and those words were there before my first edit to this article. Those are contributions from other editors and okay because they cover the different sides, meet the NPOV and other core wikipedia community agreed content guidelines. Italawar (talk) 14:14, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
@Italawar: Isn’t that clear for you that wordpress and personal blogs are not WP:RS?— Harshil want to talk? 14:52, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Hello Harshil169: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:45, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Request on 03:09:22, 26 December 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Chakrisahithi


Hi Harshil ! Could you please elaborate where this DRAFT does not meet notability criteria? What are the things required to meet the notability criteria in this DRAFT? Please help me. I think I have submitted links from reliable sources.

Chakrisahithi (talk) 03:09, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

POVFORK

Do you even understand what a WP:POVFORK means ? I hope you know that just using these abbreviations does not make anyone look smarter. It is the weight of the argument that really matters and not how many abbreviations you added. And inappropriate usage of these abbreviations actually makes one appear as a fool to others. --DBigXrayᗙ 07:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

I know it and I used when article declared 4 accused as culprits and suspected plot at finalised murder plot. — Harshil want to talk? 08:21, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Facepalm Facepalm on the know it all. Well can you explain how that makes the article a POV-FORK ? --DBigXrayᗙ 08:39, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
waiting for a reply. --DBigXrayᗙ 11:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Since I did not hear back from you, I would assume you dont know the answer, So I will go ahead and clarify. For an article to be called a WP:POVFORK first of all it has to be a WP:CFORK of something. Can you tell me from which article this had been Forked off ? IMHO there isn't any. So I hope this clarifies the folly of this statement. --DBigXrayᗙ 10:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Why are the controversies section from "Jaggi vasudev" has been removed? Those are valid FIRs or cases filed against the organization. Also in the info section there are content which doesnt have citation which is against wiki policy. Why you want to revert my edit? Charan19 (talk) 07:01, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
It’s against organisation not against person. Harshil want to talk? 08:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Removing content from CAA Protest

Hi Harshil, AS I noted on the talk page of CAA Protest, while reviewing the history I have found multiple instances where you have removed content that was not COPYVIO with the edit summary "Removing as Copyvio". I have already restored many of them. I am asking you to be more careful. If you continue repeating this, I would be requesting admins to prevent you from editing that page. regards. --Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 18:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Not possible. I’ve only removed copyvio by searching them in the sources cited. — Harshil want to talk? 00:53, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
(talk page watcher) If you find copyvio due to sentences directly copied from sources, please reword the sentences instead of removing them. So the information is retained and someone else's efforts are not lost. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 11:34, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Indeed Nizil Shah, That is what a normal editor editing to improve the article would think. And that is what I stated on the talk page in the second half but it seems these 2 were more intent on name calling and waving the rulebook, So a further clarification was provided to both of them. Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 12:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, Brihaspati. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Swami Chakrapani.
Message added 00:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Harshil169!

Happy New Year!

Harshil169,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Jaggi Vasudev

The page is already semiprotected for a year, so I'm not sure that further action is necessary at this time. But by all means, feel free to elaborate. Regards, El_C 14:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

El_C, It appears he wants it indef protected [2]. I object to this proposal though. --Happy New Year! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 15:02, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
I want it under DS and his watchlist because he has toxic fan following which will be disruptive. — Harshil want to talk? 15:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Well, we have a year reprieve, in any case. But if disruption persists even before then, an Arbitration enforcement extended-confirmed protection would certainly be on the table. El_C 15:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
User:Harshil169 as a WP:BLP it is already covered by WP:ACDS BLP. If you want a specific page restriction then you will have to make a specific request and there need to be justification, along with the evidence of problems, for that request. --Happy New Year! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 15:40, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Sonny Mehta

On 4 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sonny Mehta, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 06:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

New message from Winged Blades of Godric

Hello, Brihaspati. You have new messages at Talk:Isha Foundation.
Message added 10:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

∯WBGconverse 10:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

I am new here!!!

Can't those guys "Sheikh Nadeem" be reported ? And is it ok to start conversationa like this in talk page? Anshul k007 (talk) 10:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

@Anshul k007: welcome to Wikipedia. We generally assume good faith. If they repeatedly violate the Wikipedia policies despite warnings then we will report them. I hope you will stay here. This is how we start convo. Read this for how to reply.-- Harshil want to talk? 10:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. But this is too complex (indentation and all) but I'll try to learn .Let me try this Anshul k007 (talk) 10:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
This is easy. Just spend time here. BTW are you from Twitter?-- Harshil want to talk? 10:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I guess i had tu use a collon there Anshul k007 (talk) 10:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
sorry for messing up with indentation. Yes i am from Twitter. Anshul k007 (talk) 10:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
@Anshul k007: Read WP:INDENT. This will be helpful.-- Harshil want to talk? 10:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Laxmi Agarwal page

Attacker's name is Nadeem or Naeem? The odd human (talk) 11:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

@The odd human: Read this judegement of SC. He was Naeem aka Guddu.-- Harshil want to talk? 11:30, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Yes Read it. Thank you brother 

The odd human (talk) 17:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Errors/factually incorrect information in the locked page have to be rectified.

This is the link : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laxmi_Agarwal

ERROR 1: [Laxmi, whose face and other body parts were disfigured in the acid attack, had a PIL in 2006. A minor then, Laxmi was attacked with acid by three men near Tughlaq road in New Delhi as she had refused to marry Nadeem Khan aka Guddu, of the trio]

FACT: The mastermind behind the acid attack on Laxmi was one Naeem Khan alias Guddu and the actual act was carried out by Rakhi who was Naeem Khan's brother Imran Khan's wife. Source: Delhi High Court Judgment #28 https://indiankanoon.org/doc/32750721/

There are several other factual errors - please read information in the above link and edit it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndieG (talk • contribs) 10:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Swami Chakrapani

Hello! Your submission of Swami Chakrapani at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Harshil169, as you can see on the nomination page, Winged Blades of Godric is not seeing any scope for a hook now that the eatery/hotel has proven problematic. Unless you can come up with something suitable, the nomination will have to be closed, since no hooks remain. Please respond as soon as possible at the nomination page. I'm sorry this hasn't worked out as you were hoping. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Hum Dekhenge

You mean a poem by Faiz Ahmad Faiz is subject to such strict copyrights that it cannot appear on Wikipedia? I find that hard to believe. El_C 16:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) El C, FYI, the song has been sung by many many artists and many versions released. Take a look here 6 renditions. IMHO we should have a lenient approach.what was the ask here ? DBigXrayᗙ 17:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
To revdelete all revisions in the article. El_C 17:08, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
El C, I see that already some versions are hidden. I don't think we need more revdels. I am sure the 1K content Harshil removed can't be the "entire" poem. So I am not sure if hiding that part was necessary. User:Ymblanter Can you clarify what exactly that 1K content, hidden recently was ? I think our article needs some popular phrase/ stanzas of the poem as quotes to be able to discuss the poem in a useful way. RS discussing the poem are also using the quotes of the poem. DBigXrayᗙ 17:49, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
I can not now find what I have hidden but if I remember correctly this was a full text of a poem which I believe was beyond fair use. Reasonable length quotes should be fine.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Ymblanter, Indeed. Thanks for the kind reply. I will also copy this thread to the article talk page for future reference. DBigXrayᗙ 19:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikhil Chandwani (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nizil Shah was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Deleted four times in past and has salted title. The references are published reliable news sources but his claims in them are of dubious and fake. No notable accomplishments. See User talk:Nizil Shah/Archive 10#Can you review? or User talk:Nizil Shah#Can you review? for detailed discussion.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nizil (talk) 07:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Harshil169! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nizil (talk) 07:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Relax buddy! Kautilya3 (talk) 08:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
@Kautilya3: Thanks! Few things happening in the life right now. Just disappointed and low.-- Harshil want to talk? 02:11, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of India's Coal Story for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article India's Coal Story is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India's Coal Story until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KartikeyaS343 (talk) 09:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Tulsi Gowda a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 19:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

February with Women in Red

February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155


Happy Valentine's Day from all of us at Women in Red.

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January 2020

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. This constitutes an unprovoked personal attack on another editor. I see that you already received a recent block for similar behaviour. I suggest you stop immediately and apologise, otherwise the community willl need to take other measures to contain your activity. — kashmīrī TALK 12:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Kashmiri, you could have read his threat in which he warned me not to edit articles related to Jaggi vasudev. Harshil want to talk? 14:32, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

my profile is having wrong details

buddy, there is plenty of wrong information i had corrected like my school's name. you can remove other links if u feel it promotional which was frankly i am unaware of the policy but from many published books names to details you have removed too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay vasavada JV (talk • contribs) 20:39, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

@Jay vasavada JV: according to conflict of interest policy of Wikipedia, you can’t edit articles related to yourself. You can suggest changes to me with reliable sources. I’ll update them. You can propose changes on Talk:Jay Vasavada too. Thanks!— Harshil want to talk? 02:29, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:The Patient Assassin.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Patient Assassin.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:21, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:The Difficulty Of Being Good.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Difficulty Of Being Good.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:44, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Partial block from Jaggi Vasudev and accompanying talk page

You have added (and edit warred over) a controversial addition pertaining to the abovementioned biography which was poorly-sourced and could not be verified. That, in itself, constitutes a serious violation of our living persons policy. As a result, you've been indefinitely partially-blocked from editing those two pages. You need to be far more careful with how you edit articles which pertain to living persons from now on. I see you have been given a BLP DS alert back in October. Please go back and review it carefully. El_C 11:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Note: Partial block lifted on the promise of fully resolving the dispute before re-adding the contentious edits. El_C 11:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Have you

ever seen any positive coverage of AYUSH Ministry or whatever work, that they do? Intending to write a GA and sources welcome over t/p of Ministry of Ayush. ∯WBGconverse 14:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Will check after 10th but yes, Swami Ramdev, Jaggi and other alternative medicine advocates have welcomed it.— Harshil want to talk? 04:02, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Sixteen Stormy Days

Hello, Harshil169,

Thank you for creating Sixteen Stormy Days.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Add talkpage with relevant Wikiproject please.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nizil Shah}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nizil (talk) 12:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Will do.— Harshil want to talk? 04:03, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Dealing with POV pushers may be draining and tough. I see that you have been targeted for your edits. Hope the tea helps you recharge your spirits. You will need a cool head and patience to deal with the harassment, if it continues. DBigXrayᗙ 11:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Will stay away from this person. Cult of Jaggi has blind devotees. No sense, only nonsense.— Harshil want to talk? 04:04, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Multiple G11 nominations of articles by the same author

Hi. I'm curious as to why you tagged various innocuous-looking articles by the same established editor as spam, in a short period of time. None of them appeared to me to "require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic" (although I do note that two were deleted by another admin, and Ibrahim Hendal which you tagged A7 probably does qualify under that criterion if we assume that the statement about participation in the IPAF Nadwa does not indicate importance).

I'm truly puzzled here and wondered if I have missed something. --kingboyk (talk) 13:50, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

@Kingboyk: What I found is most of them are growing author and their bio has been used as reference to float superfluous claims via Wikipedia. That’s something worrying, so, I tagged them. I’ll take them to AfD if CSD will be unsuccessful. — Harshil want to talk? 14:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
I see, thank you.
I've asked another admin for a second opinion on the speedies that I declined, and asked the deleting admin about those which were deleted, so you can leave that with me. --kingboyk (talk) 14:57, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
@Kingboyk: No worries. You can search names of these people and you’ll find they’re attaching their Wiki pages on important occasions. Pay attention.— Harshil want to talk? 15:11, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
If you're suggesting what I think you're suggesting you should please post at WP:COIN.
Pay attention? If I wasn't diligent I wouldn't be here now. Speedy deletion is supposed to be speedy :). If there are nuances involved or an admin would need to do detailed research to process the request, better send it to AfD. G11 is for clear cut spam.
Anyway, that's all from me unless I get some feedback I need to share with you. Thanks again. --kingboyk (talk) 15:20, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Jai Shri Ram shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Both you and Edward Zigma are edit-warring; I am placing this message here only because you have already placed a warning on the other user's page. Dorsetonian (talk) 09:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

New message from DBigXray

Hello, Brihaspati. You have new messages at Talk:Jai_Shri_Ram#Addition_of_Gargi_college_sexual_harassment_incident..
Message added 11:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DBigXrayᗙ 11:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Quint. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. KartikeyaS343 (talk) 13:58, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

LOL— Harshil want to talk? 14:25, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Rollback

Please be a bit more careful with rollback - this edit really doesn't qualify - with the edit summary, it's a good faith effort to improve the article. Not something I'd agree with and probably revert, but not with rollback which should only be for obvious vandalism. Please be careful. Ravensfire (talk) 22:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

re your response, nah, because they did give a reason, even if you disagree with it. WP:NOTVANDAL is pretty specific, and that was a pretty clear BOLD edit. There's been a couple of folks on ANI losing rollback of late, so hate to see if happen to someone else. (Although to be honest, you don't see me with it, I just use Twinkle!) Ravensfire (talk) 23:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

[WikiConference India 2020] Conference & Event Grant proposal

WikiConference India 2020 team is happy to inform you that the Conference & Event Grant proposal for WikiConference India 2020 has been submitted to the Wikimedia Foundation. This is to notify community members that for the last two weeks we have opened the proposal for community review, according to the timeline, post notifying on Indian Wikimedia community mailing list. After receiving feedback from several community members, certain aspects of the proposal and the budget have been changed. However, community members can still continue engage on the talk page, for any suggestions/questions/comments. After going through the proposal + FAQs, if you feel contented, please endorse the proposal at WikiConference_India_2020#Endorsements, along with a rationale for endorsing this project. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK for The Patient Assassin

On 23 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Patient Assassin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Patient Assassin, a biography of Udham Singh by Anita Anand, uses evidence from documents released under the UK's Freedom of Information Act? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Patient Assassin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Patient Assassin), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Wug·a·po·des​ 03:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC) 00:02, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020 at Women in Red

March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159


Happy Women's History Month from all of us at Women in Red.

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Revert

Actually revert was done due to remove OpIndia link. But due to difference of seconds your references were removed as you touch the revert button earlier.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk)

It shows all of us need to be patient and forgiving. this is a heavily edited page. ⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 12:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
DBigXray, I know. I am avoiding these controversial areas as of now. I am mostly focused on making pages related to books and improving pages of Indians females who were first in their field. Like, Janaki Ammal- first female botanist. These are least controversial topics on Wiki. Harshil want to talk? 12:46, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Harshil169, hmm, can you still watch out this page for reverting blatant POV. It will be very helpful. thanks. ⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 12:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
DBigXray, yes but I am too busy nowadays. Going to Mumbai morrow regarding Wikipedia TTT by CIS-A2K. It will be upto 2nd March. Don't have much time. Harshil want to talk? 12:52, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Harshil169, ok. ⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 12:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Add info on your user page About yourself

Add info on your user page about yourself Kundan Ravindra Dhayade (talk) 09:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

@Kundan Ravindra Dhayade: so long as it complies with WP:UPYES and WP:UPNOT. Doug Weller talk 09:20, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Reason for removal

Why the content I added on the page Hinduism in Pakistan was removed.I wrote it in my own words, so why it is a copyright violation Chillybox (talk) 05:59, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

@Chillybox and Brihaspati: as I would normally revision/delete copyright so that only Admins can see it, I checked. There's a problem with "The Scheduled Caste Hindu women generally work in farm lands while the Upper- Caste Hindu women are generally housewives. The Upper caste Hindu women wears Mangal sutra, Sindoor, and Bindi. In addition to these, the Scheduled Caste Hindu women, wear Choora and traditional ghagra dress." which is too similar to the original text, but I'm not convinced about the rest. I may have missed something of couse. Doug Weller talk 09:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Reason for removal

The edit that you made sir has no reference, The reference doesn't mention any of what you have written? Bhattakeel9 (talk) 15:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Brihaspati

Thank you for creating Krishna Yogeshvara.

User:Gazal world, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I hope, you will add synopsis of the book.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Gazal world}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Gazal world (talk) 17:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Information icon I noticed that a message you recently left to a newcomer may have been unduly harsh. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see others making a common mistake, consider politely pointing out what they did wrong and showing them how to correct it. It takes more time, but it helps us retain new editors. I don't think this is a personal attack. Use the talk page of the article to discuss. This user is new and has questions. I got something in the teahaus. Also take a look at WP:CIR. Aasim 16:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Awesome Aasim, he called me that I work for political party-BJP. That is not personal attack. Well, I have nothing to say about your judgemental skill. Brihaspati (talk) 16:04, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Now I am confused what is going on. I have been WP:AGF from the start and am still unsure about what is happening. I may have been confused by that message, but I am not sure. The user has only made 30 mainspace edits and is probably still learning the ropes. It took me about 200 edits and a year and a half before I learned about Wikipedia's meta-processes and policies. Have you pointed out relevant policies and guidelines? I think mentioning blocks may scare the user away. Maybe a message like "I undid your edit because I think it goes against policy, but I am happy to discuss the edit with you", mentioning any community/ArbCom sanctions authorized in the topic area, opening a discussion thread (which you have done already), and only mentioning blocks if the user does not seem to be listening. I do notice problems with the edits as well, but I do not think the user has gotten an official welcome either. They may also be confused with the Wikipedia jargon you are using (like BLP and NPOV). Aasim 16:23, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
And your report at WP:AN/EW was closed as "No violation". Aasim 16:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Awesome Aasim, FWIW, I didn't report him. Another editor did. Brihaspati (talk) 16:40, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020 at Women in Red

May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166


May offerings at Women in Red.

Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brihaspati, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

— Newslinger talk 22:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

@Newslinger: that’s not my sockpuppet. I’ve only one account and due to block, I have temporarily left editing across all Wikimedia projects. — Brihaspati (talk) 05:27, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020 at Women in Red

Women in Red

June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169

Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi Brihaspati/Archives! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

  1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
  2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
  3. Paste {{Frs user|{{subst:currentuser}}|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
  4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name on the FRS page, you may be receiving this message. If so, make sure your new account name is on the FRS list instead.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Transparency: Pardarshita moved to draftspace

The article Transparency: Pardarshita is not written from a neutral point of view. It was created by you, an editor who's been blocked for undisclosed paid editing, and has since been heavily edited by a single purpose account exclusively dedicated to it and the related draft. These facts suggest a strong likelihood of an undisclosed conflict-of-interest editing. I have, therefore, moved it to draftspace, so that it goes through the WP:AFC process as required by the conflict of interest editing guidelines. Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

July 2020 at Women in Red

Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

August 2020 at Women in Red

Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September Women in Red edithons

Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October editathons from Women in Red

Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red

Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December with Women in Red

Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your draft article, Draft:Nikhil Chandwani

Hello, Brihaspati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nikhil Chandwani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

A New Year With Women in Red!

Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

March 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April editathons from Women in Red

Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Speedy deletion nomination of Ramesh Solanki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ramesh Solanki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Charlieheb (talk) 00:37, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

August Editathons from Women in Red

Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brihaspati/Archives/Archive_2&oldid=1041206928"