Jump to content

User talk:Blague7/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Thanoscar21/sandbox/User:Thanoscar21

A tag has been placed on User:Thanoscar21/sandbox/User:Thanoscar21 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Breaking sticks (talk) 22:54, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Thanoscar21 (December 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 22:25, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Thanoscar21! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 22:25, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IPhone (2020) (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is a placeholder until the name is defined. It doesn't have enough sourcing for it to be its own article yet.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Apple Watch (sixth generation) (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
Wikipedia does not do rumours
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 21:27, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Thanoscar21, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 21:27, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help


Marking edits as minor

Hi Thanoscar21, please review the definition of a minor edit at WP:MINOR. Several of your recent edits to Republican Party (United States) that you marked as minor don't meet the criteria. Regards, Sdkb (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm LanHikari64. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Barack Obama, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Hey, that was incorrect information. Please read a source before adding information that you believe is in it. Barack Obama got 19 votes and Donald Trump got 13. LanHikari64 (talk) 17:55, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CNN 10 (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 22:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6G (network) (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
WP:CRYSTAL for now. No firm plans to define or implement this.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Thanoscar21! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Plus 8 (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sam-2727 were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
"beating out every other smartphone in the category" is not very formal encyclopedic language. Also it is only expected to be revealed, not known to be for certain. This will likely be created in the mainspace very soon anyway.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sam-2727 (talk) 21:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for making it sound like that. OnePlus actually did reveal everything in this article, so all of it is true. Thanoscar21 (talk) 21:23, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:One Plus 8 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:One Plus 8. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 21:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

...

Dude. My username is Kookie Cookie Knows What's Best, but I think the Kookie one is you. It's 2020. 2054 isn't for another 34 years. Kookie Cookie Knows What's Best (talk) 13:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

No, I know, it's all just for fun! Thanoscar21 (talk) 14:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

... Kookie Cookie Knows What's Best (talk) 17:02, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

You are more kookie than I thought Kookie Cookie Knows What's Best (talk) 17:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Indubitably. Thanoscar21 (talk) 17:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
That editor was a WP:Sockpuppet. Doug Weller talk 13:44, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations!

CVU Academy Graduate
Congratulations from both myself and all of the instructors at the Counter Vandalism Unit Academy on your successful completion of the Counter Vandalism Unit Academy. You completed your final exam with a score of 95%. Well done!

It has been a pleasure working with you this past week or so, and thank you for offering to help out in removing vandalism from the project's articles. If you ever need any advice or assistance in the future, you're always welcome on my talk page.

Hope to see you around! --Puddleglum2.0(How's my driving?) 17:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Once Upon a Virus... (Chinese propaganda) (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 16:28, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Thanoscar21! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can someone tell me how to hide an edit?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Renderforest (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 14:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


May 2020

Information icon

Hello Thanoscar21. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Thanoscar21. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Thanoscar21|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS 💬 14:43, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


Disclaimer: I am not paid to edit, I was not paid to edit, and I never have been paid to edit. Thanoscar21 (talk) 14:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Thanoscar21

Thank you for creating Hilton, South Carolina.

User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please don't create unreferenced articles about obscure places. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 22:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

@Insertcleverphrasehere:, sorry. I won't do it again, but it was on the Requested Articles page and I couldn't find any sources. Respectfully, Thanoscar21 (talk) 22:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You're good at doing anti-vandalism with Twinkle, which is an impressive achievement. I dream of horses (talk page) (Contribs) Remember to notify me after replying off my talk page. 14:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! Thanoscar21 (talk) 14:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Your Ignorance

Why do Hispanic people need to go above and beyond to be considered American on this website when others do not have to show proof of their American citizenship or nationality....? Can you answer that? I'm sure if the person being described on the page is Caucasian, you just immediately take the editors word for it that they are American. They could have been born in Ireland and there would be no need to prove it because they fit your made-up American image. In case you haven't noticed, the United States is full of a diverse group of people with varying ethnic backgrounds. You and others like you on this site need to get with the times.👍🏼👍🏼💭No Caucasian person with a Wikipedia page is ever described as "white" or "Caucasian" or "Anglo", so why does Gabriel Fernandez's ethnic background matter? I don't think you realize your "rule" comes off very racist and discriminatory. Just wanted to let you know that! FightForWhatsRight (talk) 14:55, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

BTW, your revert was correct, just assuring you. I've had to revert this user as well now, just wanted to make sure you knew what you did was the right thing. -- puddleglum2.0 15:01, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, User:Puddleglum2.0. Thanoscar21 (talk) 15:05, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

This person fights "vandalism" but not racism. LOL. Actually contributes to it. Such a humanitarian... Reward him/her. :') FightForWhatsRight (talk) 15:19, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

User blocked. Thanoscar21 (talk) 15:46, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanoscar21, no that user isn't and had never been. Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 10:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Eumat114: Sorry, I meant from contacting me. Thanoscar21 (talk) 13:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

You are a sock puppet of vandalism account Querigin

The investigation is on the way. 103.7.43.131 (talk) 22:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

No, I'm not. You're clearly not someone that opens sockpuppet investigations. And if there really was an investigation, an administrator or someone else would have given me a formal notice. Thanoscar21 (talk) 22:19, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

This ip filed a false report on me over here claiming I vandalized articles past non-existent four warnings and am posting racism.Querigin (talk) 22:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 103.7.43.131 (talk) 22:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

You got blocked, huh? Please don't start investigations that backfire on you and waste others' time. Thank you. Thanoscar21 (talk) 15:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Wiki edit

Thank you someone told me you can edit info on wikiPedia making it not a credible source but this proved them wrong thank you i appreciate Men144k (talk) 14:54, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Well, there's a page called "Recent Changes", and there are more people like me who patrol that list, stopping vandalism and unsourced material. Thanks, Thanoscar21 (talk) 14:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Anarchyte (talk • work) 16:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Thanoscar21. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2020-07-05. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talk • work) 16:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Delvaux wikipedia page

Dear Thanoscar,

I answer to your message from yesterday. I tried to change the Wikipedia page relating to Delvaux. Delvaux is a company where I work as a legal counsel. (you can consult my linkedin page as a proof of my position there). We want to change the Delvaux page, as its content is not accurate and up to date. Therefore, we drafted a text that is more up to date. Also, the CEO of Delvaux has changed and it is an information that needs to be updated. How can I proceed to change it ?

Best regards,

Marie de Bellefroid Attorney at law — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariedb1829 (talk • contribs) 07:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

@Mariedb1829: Hi. For this, you'll need to provide a reliable source. I see that on Google, there's many. On Wikipedia, everything must be sourced from a trustworthy source. Even then, it is strongly discouraged to write about yourself or your company. For this, go to the teahouse, where experienced editors help out others. Thanks! Thanoscar21talk, contribs 13:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

stop using wiki as advertising for movies.

why does ready player one need a full page ad on wiki? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.0.234.216 (talk) 12:48, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Conversation moved to relevant talk page. Thanoscar21talk, contribs 14:02, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Question

Can I steal your “Most useless contributor” box and adapt it? It would look great on my mess of a userapge... Stay safe and well, --Total Eclipse 2017 (talk | contribs)

@Total Eclipse 2017: I mean, I adapted it from Ritchie333's page, so I don't see why not... Thanoscar21talk, contribs 21:43, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Done. Do you like it? Stay safe and well, --Total Eclipse 2017 (talk | contribs) 17:11, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
@Total Eclipse 2017: It's great... Thanoscar21talk, contribs 18:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Uninstall Script

Hello! Please uninstall the script I made as it now interferes with the new rollback icon mechanism. In rev14, you can now drag the icons in any arrangement you like in your preferences. Hope you like the new update! Ed6767 talk! 23:36, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Ed6767 Thank you! Thanoscar21talk, contribs 21:24, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Quick note on the GOCE blitz

Hi Thanoscar21. Thank you for your participation in the Guild of Copy Editors blitz! Please note that for the blitz we are focusing on articles tagged in May. Feel free to keep the three articles you've already done that were tagged in June, but going forward please concentrate on articles from the May list. Also, I reviewed Bisram Khan and made a few additional changes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Tdslk (talk) 03:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Tdslk, okay, thanks for the heads up! Thanoscar21talk, contribs 14:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

RE: Section blanking

I think you made a mistake. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 23:52, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Also you used rollback inappropriately... I’m going to need an apology. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 23:53, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

@Horse Eye Jack: Your edit summary was literally, "It was a good delete though". Why delete notable brands? Some of the brands have their own pages, that should be Please explain to me how I made a mistake. How did I use rollback incorrectly? I clicked on "Good faith". If you would like an apology, then fine. I'm sorry if I caused you any distress. Thanks, Thanoscar21talk, contribs 00:06, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
And I didn't use rollback... I used RedWarn. Thanoscar21talk, contribs 00:06, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Just look at the edit history... Thats the second part of a two part edit, first I reverted Zefr’s edit because that was less work than teasing the individual bits out and then I deleted the *completely unsourced section* (yes I know they’re notable... I made I-Mei Foods) because I felt that part of their edit was good. I see now that you only said rollback when you did nothing of the sort, please don’t use misleading edit summaries like that. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 00:14, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Also don’t misquote me, I said “This section was a good delete though.” Your fix edit was also not a fix at all and I now need to go clean up your mess. Thanks. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 00:14, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Also wait... You reverted the other edit [1] with the edit summary “ Non-english is perfectly acceptable," not the one which deleted the unsourced section with the edit summary “This section was a good delete though," is that what you were trying to do? Horse Eye Jack (talk) 00:16, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
@Horse Eye Jack: I did not use rollback! I used RedWarn. Read through WP:THREATEN. And yes, I was trying to do that, I was going to revert the other edit, though I got distracted... Thanks, Thanoscar21talk, contribs 00:21, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Yes I realized that and corrected myself before your post, it means your edit summary was misleading though. You still need to explain your edit, your current “sorry, I fucked up” doesn’t really cut the mustard. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 00:23, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Horse Eye Jack: So this is all for an edit summary? Thanoscar21talk, contribs 00:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
This is about your, apparently unintentional, disruptive editing. I want to make sure you don’t repeat your unacceptable behavior. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 00:27, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Also I double checked... You did use rollback, its tagged [2]. Please excuse my lack of nuance when it comes to bad edits. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 00:32, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Theres also no justification for your edit, I should be the one placing a warning tag here for introducing unsourced text into an article not you placing a bullshit “section blanking” warning on my talk page. WTF was up with the warning? Horse Eye Jack (talk) 00:32, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Horse Eye Jack, what's unacceptable about my behavior? I made a mistake, everybody makes mistakes. What content did I add that was unsourced? I merely reinstated a section. If you want assurances, I won't do it again, I learnt from my mistake. Thank you. Thanoscar21talk, contribs 20:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Question about a change I made that you reverted.

You reverted a page I edited here: 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2600:1700:3BD0:21CF:9048:D451:C5B2:9610

saying "but you didn't provide a reliable source." The change you reverted removed the link to the article from Xinhua News Agency - which is the official State-Run News Agency of record speaking of their own president.

Was the problem that I cited the reference incorrectly in my edit (in which case I could change it), or that you didn't like the source (though I'm not sure which news agency you'd think is better positioned to speak to the statements from the President of China). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:3BD0:21CF:9048:D451:C5B2:9610 (talk) 04:09, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Moved to relevant talk page. Xinhua is the propaganda machine of the CCP. Thanoscar21talk, contribs 20:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020 GOCE blitz bling

The Minor Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to Thanoscar21 for copy edits totaling between 1 and 1,999 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE June 2020 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 16:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in the blitz! Please consider voting in the GOCE coordinator elections which are open through 30 June. – Reidgreg (talk) 16:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

"IOS 15" listed at Redirects for discussion

Information icon A discussion is taking place to address the redirect IOS 15. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 27#IOS 15 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix (talk) 01:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Revert on Samuel Hamilton Walker

Hey, I just noticed your revert on Samuel Hamilton Walker (diff). Are you sure the contribution is promotional? The book seems to be a credible source that's relevant to the subject (see here or here). To me, it looked more like an editor unfamiliar with Wikipedia inserting something in the wrong section. Best, Blablubbs (talk) 23:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

@Blablubbs: You're right, sorry about that. I've reinstated the book in the proper area. Thanks, Thanoscar21talk, contribs 23:43, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Thanoscar21/sandbox/User:Thanoscar21

Hello, Thanoscar21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/User:Thanoscar21".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 03:55, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Reversion of CurtisJD's contributions

HI there,

I am removing CurtisJD's edits because they are adding all their own predictions to all the Senate election pages without discussing whether their own firm should be included.

Thanks, 146.198.187.56 (talk) 21:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, that was a huge misunderstanding on my part. However, please don't hound editors like that. Just place unsourced warnings on their talk page. Also, please add edit summaries. Thank you! Thanoscar21talk, contribs 21:12, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, sorry about that I don't usually edit wikipedia so I'm not sure on the etiquette. 146.198.187.56 (talk) 21:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
No problem! Feel free to create an account and start editing Wikipedia! Thanoscar21talk, contribs 21:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Reply

Hi, I’m not sure which edit you are talking about? Is it the 35 death/casualty section?

@YuukiHirohiko: Yup. There are news sources saying that the soldiers were killed, so it's very much confirmed. Here's a source and here's another. Thanks, Thanoscar21talk, contribs 18:38, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Please read the talk page. https://eurasiantimes.com/how-many-chinese-soldiers-were-killed-in-the-india-china-border-clash/ YuukiHirohiko (talk) 22:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
@YuukiHirohiko: And what does that change? Thanoscar21talk, contribs 22:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
“ Sources in the Indian government are citing ‘some’ U.S. intelligence reports which claim that 35 Chinese soldiers were killed during the violent clash with the Indian army. The figure, however, is a combination of a total number of soldiers killed and wounded.” YuukiHirohiko (talk) 23:00, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
@YuukiHirohiko: I reverted the original edits because you replaced "sources" with "claims". Technically, the "Indian" part shouldn't be there. because Al Jazeera is definitely not Indian. Can you explain why you changed "sources" to "claims"? Thanks, Thanoscar21talk, contribs 23:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
The original sources were 43 killed claim released by ANI. YuukiHirohiko (talk) 23:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
@YuukiHirohiko: Ok, but that's not just a claim. Multiple WP:RS have stated that figure. Thanks, Thanoscar21talk, contribs 23:14, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Consensus was met in talk page if it’s unconfirmed, it’s a claim. YuukiHirohiko (talk) 23:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
@YuukiHirohiko: Can you point to me where? Thanoscar21talk, contribs 20:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi, there was a section and you should try finding it in the old versions. There was a discussion where people were thinking of leaving it as Indian sources or claims on the 40 deaths figure, instead of saying “Indian media made up the 43 deaths” because China rejected the 40+ death toll, its better to leave it as “claimed”. No major western nor Chinese media acknowledges the 43 casualties, the only initial source was ABP news and it was deemed long unreliable as it’s a party backed media. YuukiHirohiko (talk) 09:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

@YuukiHirohiko: Can you provide a diff please? Thanoscar21talk, contribs 19:33, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
@YuukiHirohiko: See the RfC on the talk page. Thanoscar21talk, contribs 23:04, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Mz7 (talk) 22:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Thanoscar21. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Mz7 (talk) 22:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Blague7/Archive_1&oldid=1257718994"