User talk:Bkissin/Archive 13

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

disclosed the COI FOR mdex

Thanks, Bkissin for your comment on my draft article.

in my latest edition ,i have discolsed COI of the article. however, altho i have COI, but generally i think the mentions,and the content are in neutral, and i ve cited the sources of YAHOO Finance, AS WELL as Business insider and so on.these are pretty legit media in the industry. as you compare to "huobi","binance",or "uniswap" they are citing and wording more like an advertisement than mine, but still their submission are up and running. that is why, i am not quite sure why is my submission is rejected.

I would appreciate your and any other assistance to improve the article. thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zzz2497 (talk • contribs) 13:04, 12 February 2022 (UTC) 

Draft: The Scottish Feudal Barony of MacDuff

For starters, thank you @Bkissin for finding my plea for help in the Tea Room, and taking the time to review my draft article. Also, thank you for not deleting it once you thought I copied parts of it from somewhere else, because copying would be a significant breach of ethics. All of the words and organizational structure in the article are my own. The parts that have references are not public knowledge and are cited. I googled phrases and only found the baronies website, which I helped to create. The language that was used there, in some cases, was verbatim from my wiki article. That site was created after the Wikipedia article and at one time linked to it when the article was in the main space. After it got moved back to drafts, the link went dead, and the sites owner removed the link. It’s the only thing I can think of that would lead you to believe I copied and pasted anything, and if I’m correct, I understand why that could have been your understanding. What do you recommend? Grnhrnt35 (talk) 07:26, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

I have updated my talk page to address your concerns, in addition to this post. I know you are both busy and an unpaid volunteer. I would like to know that I have done what I need to do to understand and address your concerns before I resubmit. Grnhrnt35 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:09, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Fixed draft: Hayyim ben David Schwartz and cleared confusion

I fixed the confusion for his last name - thanks for pointing it out! Meiselman2 (talk) 02:30, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Jeremy Nunes

This as declined due to not enough media coverage. I am new to wiki and really trying to help this comedian who I'm a fan of and is very talented. I can also add his discography (I beleive 5 separate albums released) and his filmography regarding his Amazon standup special. Would that qualify him? I'm really trying to be part of this community but it is increasingly difficult. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.245.84.106 (talk) 13:31, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Templates

Thank you kindly for reviewing and approving those two templates I made! Best regards. Wareno (talk) 21:29, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Justin Guerrera's Page Denial

Hi Bkissin, Thank you for taking the time to review Justin's original submission. I have updated the article to include new sources from more well known outlines that you may find here ([Article 1, [Article 2])

Additionally, you left a comment that stated, "Justin will become notable when he plays in an MLB game", and would like a further explanation. Even though Justin has not yet been promoted to a Major League Roster, he is still considered a Professional Baseball Player even if he is a Minor League Player. Further, if the qualifier for approval in regards to Pro Baseball Players is to compete in a MLB game, could you provide some clarity into why many of Justin's contemporaries have received their approval and posses active Wiki pages. For clarity purposes, you may refer to such referenced examples as follows: Cody Morissette {highest level reached, Low-A) Link:; Ivan Melendez (was drafted, but did not sign and is still in college) link:; please let me know if you would like me to provide additional examples.

You may also find other Mets Minor League Players that have yet to make their big league debut, but possess a wiki page here:(See Highlighted Names).

Look forward to your thoughts and any adjustments I should make in order to receive approval. Thank you in advance for taking the time to read, review, and any guidance provided.

Aministeri (talk) 20:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Request on 11:24:45, 18 February 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Lalityaduvanshi86

• Lalityaduvanshi86 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Lalityaduvanshi86 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Lalityaduvanshi86 (talk) 11:24, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

food related articles

Hey, just FYI -- I know I've been missing, but I do appreciate the notifications and try to get into the AFC when I can! It's just that many times the article needs significant research and I may be in the meantime be working on other things! Please do keep notifying me! valereee (talk) 22:43, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

No worries, I definitely get it. I wouldn't want to spend more time than necessary at AfC either! LOL :D I'll keep you posted but I'll try not to pester you. Bkissin (talk) 23:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

@Valereee: do you mind if take this offer as well. Not that I come across food articles often but on occasion. Another trick, if they happen to be declined, is to add the {{promising draft}} tag which will prevent them from being deleted the first G13 go around so keeps them for a year-ish and adds them to Category:Promising draft articles. S0091 (talk) 23:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

@S0091, absolutely feel free to ping me to food drafts that seems to be worth taking a look at! I'm not interested in commercial stuff -- self-promoting restaurants chains and food/drink producers -- but a traditional food or drink, always. valereee (talk) 23:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

@Valereee: I get it. You are interested in actual food...that stuff we eat, generally culturally significant, etc. (apologies Bkissin for taking up your talk page). S0091 (talk) 23:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Gazeta e pavarur

Hi, can you please review this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gazeta_e_pavarur. Please review and let me know if there is anything I need to revise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SalihiJunuz (talk • contribs) 17:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Question

Hi Bkissin, I was wondering, you reviewed or left a comment on this draft submitted for approval. My question is if you are an extended confirmed user, how do you have the privileges of reviewing pages? Just curious. Neo the Twin (talk) 17:07, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

@Neo the Twin:, not that it's any of your business, but yes, I am an Extended Confirmed User and have been for several years. Bkissin (talk) 19:12, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Bkissin, sorry mate I did not mean to step on your toe but I just wanted to be like you and be able to do more in the English Wikipedia. Neo the Twin (talk) 19:57, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

@Neo the Twin:, sorry man. I interpeted your "how do you have the privileges of reviewing pages" as "who gives you the right to review pages?" (which is a lot more aggressive than you meant, I'm sure). To answer your question, I've been for over 15 years, and I definitely started from the bottom, fixing vandalism and editing spelling mistakes, etc. Little by little I moved into adding my opinion on Articles for deletion discussions. After understanding what leads to articles deleted and what makes a good article, I started making articles, (some got deleted, but you live and learn). I only started reviewing articles for creation a couple years ago. Basically an extended confirmed user can join the Articles for Creation team at any time, but you'll be successful if you understand everything I previously mentioned. Bkissin (talk) 23:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Kadda Sheekoff

This draft is a wounded animal that needs to be shot. I have it under review and will write it up for MFD within 24 hours.

I infer that you thought much the same and wanted to know if I agreed. If that was the question, yes. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon: yeah, pretty much. There have been several articles like that over the years that you and I have encountered together, and I couldn't remember whether that was one of them. Bkissin (talk) 17:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

It's even worse than I had thought. It was already deleted at MFD once before, so this draft is not just a wounded animal but a zombie. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Dan Erickson

Hi, thanks so much for reviewing my article about screenwriter Dan Erickson already. It's my first ever new complete article, so appreciate the feedback. There wasn't much information out there about him, most of sources were basically all the cast talking about the writer in glowing terms, so probably that's why the article sounds sorta "puffery". But I guess I was overcompensating with the lack of information. If you can tell me where it sounds informal, I can try to improve it. Or perhaps if it's approved, other more experienced wikipedia editors can take down the tone to the appropriate level. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeveranceFan (talk • contribs) 03:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Treeapp

Hi Bkissin

Thank you for your review!

I have taken a look at your comments but I believe that the references used are from independent, reliable, published sources. Could you please advise me further on how to get my article approved?

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by TA2204 (talk • contribs) 11:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Tabato

Hello !

I saw your comment on my draft about Tabato. Can you help me to understand which parts are not enough neutral for you please ? I am a begginer in Wikipedia. And about the sources, unfortunately, Tabato is not really known in the world and in Africa there is not much archives. My main source is here, with the locals of this village and an other article on wikipedia in deutch. Can I use this page as a source? Thank you for your time and help ! Hope to be a better writer soon ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turtle.exp (talk • contribs) 12:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Shahar Tavoch

Hi there @Bkissin, I noticed your comment on my draft!

I noticed your use of the word "plea" in the comment (...I was brought back here by the author's plea for a review at the Teahouse... —You).

I am sorry if I came across as pleading, as my intentions were simply to ask how long a draft re-review usually takes. Please accept my apology. QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 13:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:KNXT-LD

Hi Bkissin!

Thank you for your comments on my draft. I went ahead and found more citations per your notes. Please review when you have a moment and let me know if anything else is needed. I appreciate your help! CATelevision (talk) 01:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your help in the draft process! Have a kitten :)

CATelevision (talk) 15:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Template review

Greetings Bkissin, a while back you reviewed two templates I created, for which I grateful. A template I've recently put together was declined approval due to the amount of red links it contained. I personally do not think that's a reasonable course of action at all: if users actually see the articles that are missing, they're more likely to go ahead and create them. Would you mind revewing it if I resubmit the template? Thanks. Wareno (talk) 23:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar
		@Bkissin: Thank you so much for approving my draft! --QuickQuokka [⁠talk • contribs] 19:33, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Can you please take a look

Hi there, Good day to you and thank you for approving my last article We are writing article for wikigap 2022 can please take a look at this one i just created. Thank you again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Baby_Gloria — Preceding unsigned comment added by Micheal Kaluba (talk • contribs) 14:18, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

draft: bryanne peterson

Greetings Bkissin, This page is our first attempt at highlighting more females in STEM fringe areas. Can you please help clarify what "peacock" language you identified in the draft so that we can ensure to clarify the language with our other planned submissions as well? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NotableSTEM (talk • contribs) 19:30, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Sam Brown (veteran) submission declined

Hi there, Bkissin! I hope all is well! If possible, can you help educate me on what documentation is needed to show notability for Sam Brown? He has raised over $2 million in 180 days, was on the front page of GQ magazine, is a Senate Candidate in Nevada, has been on 20 major news outlet segments in the last six months. What information should I send you to show that he potentially meets notability guidelines? Thank you so much for your time and support here. I am new at Wikipedia and your expertise means a lot. X72153 (talk) 16:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)x72153

(by talk reader) @X72153: I think the subject passes WP:GNG but Draft:Sam Brown (veteran) is really promotionally written. At this point you need to come clean about any conflict of interest you have regarding Sam Brown. Those of us who run this website are volunteers and we do not take kindly to promotional efforts, especially from monied interests trying to push a political candidate. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:09, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

@Chris troutmanThank you for helping me to understand that the article appears to be promotionally written. This is my first article. I am a huge fan of Sam Brown because he seems to be a candidate centered around service, who was blown in Afghanistan serving our nation. What top three sentences stand out to you as "promotional"? I have tried to pull facts explicitly from news outlets. This is really helpful, thank you for your time and education here. X72153 (talk) 18:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

No, I insist you answer my question, as required by Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. In 2019 you twice removed cited material from a biography without explanation. Coincidentally, the bio in question was another veteran, another Republican politician. Unless I get a satisfactory answer I'm going to escalate this. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:09, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

I did not think that the write-up came across as promotional, given that the statements made in the article are facts coming from multiple news sources. In fact, the news outlets were much more salacious and promotional (you could even say they were sensationalizing content) for the sake of getting views. I dumbed down the news outlets to just facts.

Furthermore, I am saddened and feel sorry (for you) that what I wrote is causing you to have such a bad day and causing you to feel upset. That wasn't my intent. You have not answered my question, about which sentences you feel are promotional. I have told you that I am a fan of Sam Brown and I think he is a great candidate who served our country and nearly died doing so. Not sure what else you want me to say here. Should the proposed article have more sentences and more references? Want to meet up for coffee? Want a zoom call? Do you want physical documents about Sam Brown's service?

Well, anyway, I truly appreciate you taking out the free time here. You seem to have a lot of it. I have to run and pick my kids up from school. Hope that you feel good about yourself. Best of luck to you in the real world. If you have time to meet up for coffee or a zoom, please let me know. X72153 (talk) 19:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Requesting a draft review

Greetings @ Bkissin

Being experienced user I took interest in the Draft:Ex-Muslim activism in Kerala which was created by new users and addressed most concerns of other user who appreciated my effort either on talk page or thanked my edits addressing their concern. (Also copy edited by two different users)

The draft is submitted since almost a month ago and awaiting a review to join in main space. Pl see if you can review or refer to some else who can help.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 11:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Congregation Shearith Israel

fixed that sentence you pointed out - just took it out.

thanks Meiselman2 (talk) 17:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Asking Why Radio Caca article is rejected

We a pleased to ask to review again because we don't know why Radio Caca is rejected but look our page is in turkey wikipedia and it is not declined. Please check below https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Caca.

We are company that is credible we have a lot of articles in bloomberg(https://www.bloomberg.com/press-releases/2022-02-07/radio-caca-raca-and-the-usc-partner-to-create-a-carbon-neutral-ceremony-venue-within-the-usm-metaverse-to-heal-the-earth) and partnerships with big universities like princeton(https://finance.yahoo.com/news/radio-caca-raca-princeton-university-120000477.html)

Thank you so much in advance we are willing to cooperate with your team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radiocacaph (talk • contribs) 02:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

@Radiocacaph Just came across this message by co incidence. Though I can not speak for User:Bkissin. For your information, to my knowledge, your this communication indicates there seems to be a WP:COI issue also present and un til some Wikipedia user feels on their own much can not be done about it other than you can leave references @ your own user page and move on. Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 04:44, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Hayyim ben David Schwartz

Hi BKissin

can I interest you in taking another look? it sounds like your subject interest.

thanks! Meiselman2 (talk) 18:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! and I will be more careful in the future.

I appreciate it! Meiselman2 (talk) 14:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Request

Hi Bkissin, Good day to you! I am requesting that Could you please help me review my pages that are having pending approval? If request accepted, please find their links below.... [[1]] [[2]] [[3]]

Thank you in Advance Micheal Kaluba (talk) 16:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Certainly Micheal! As long as you are not being paid by the people you are writing articles for. Bkissin (talk) 16:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Response

Thank you friend user, thanks for help me fixing that problem, have a good time.--BrugesFR (talk) 14:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

The homies guild draft

Why did you decline the submission for this page, this page does not meet the requirements for Speedy deletion. It is not threatening, it is not vandilism, it is a real thing that was at once very prominent in the community of Wilmington, Massachusetts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikieditor1232 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Miss information

The information quoted from the saltwire article on Nova Scotians United, is infact misinformation and a satire (I am the offical agent of NSU). We though it is true we don't agree in how covid restrictions were handled here in Nova Scotia, we do believe that there should have been a government response. The government response we believe should have been based in things like increasing space in our hospitals (permanently and temporarily), increasing pay for the hospital staff, government being more open and honest and allowing uncomfortable questions without belittling those asking the questions with labels like "fringe minority" all the way down to "terrorists". We believe in facts being presented separately to the opinions of the political opinions (ex; fact: the covid 19 treatment though it can help the majority of people, is not fully tested and the information on covid 19 treatment has not been fully released to the public though Phifer has begun to release that documentation. Opinion: the covid 19 vaccines are safe and effective)

The covid 19 response could have been a major win for our health care system through government investment in our Healthcare system and by allowing covid to hit our population slowly. Any attempt to say this to a government offical has come back to haunt those who say it with new restrictions and laws made against them in response, ignored phone calls and emails, a refusal of a public conversation or private conversation that answers questions without pushing a specific opinion. Refusal to look at facts and allow people to come up with their own opinions and make their own decisions with out government consequences based on specific information.

Our fight is not against covid restrictions but simply the ability to question government as a whole, the proper use of tax dollars for long term effective strategies for Nova Scotians along with fighting for independence in the media with the presentation of facts separate from opinions. 64.66.210.126 (talk) 12:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello!

Hi, Bkissin,

I came here to ask you a question but I instead decided to leave you a comment. It seems like you get a lot of queries here on your talk page from editors that you don't respond to. It looks like you were pretty active on your talk page up to February 2022 but basically stopped responding after that. As a very experienced AFC reviewer, you're going to get a lot of questions about your reviews, especially when you decline a draft. I imagine this can get tiresome, especially when a draft shows little promise of ever being approved and moved to main space. Every day I look at stale drafts and many of them are in poor shape.

But for some of these new editors, you might be their first and only contact to an editor with experience working on Wikipedia. If you are too busy to offer personal advice, I encourage you to point them in the direction of the Teahouse, the Help Desk or the AFC Help Desk where they might find an editor who can provide them with some help. This doesn't take a lot of time and it can point a confused editor in a helpful direction. Thank you for all of your contributions to the project, it is appreciated! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:25, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Liz. I will try my best to respond better to folks. Usually (for my own sanity) I subscribe to the school of thought that if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all, but that doesn't AGF among the myriad of paid or COI editors that are over in the AFC queue. I will be sure to at the very least refer them to the helpdesks available to new editors. Thanks for reaching out. Bkissin (talk) 15:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Review draft for 'Battle of Grozny (March 1996)'

Could you please review the article again? Much thanks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Battle_of_Grozny_(March_1996) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LuckyStrike007 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

NI elections

Would you mind double checking the numbers you enter (62.51% [North Antrim] rounds to 63, no 62 - seems the Beebs got it wrong)? The turnout percentage should be given to two decimals in any case (the exact numbers are available from the Electoral Office Northern Ireland Twitter, [4]), like it is elsewhere throughout the articles; and similarly for the FPV percentages. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:56, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Absolutely. I saw your note in Newry. Since I'm not a twitter user (just a lurker), the EONI account will only show me a handful of tweets before there's a wall. I'll just use simple math (or maths, if you prefer) to determine the percentages that extra decimal place. Bkissin (talk) 17:00, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

I just haven't refreshed the Twitter page in an hour or two, so that's probably why I have the older tweets. Anyway there's not too many constituencies where the turnout numbers are not there yet so I'll just run through the rest if that's simpler for you. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:03, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Oh yeah, absolutely if you want to handle the turnout that's fine. I'm working on updating the counts anyway. Bkissin (talk) 17:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Fractional votes

Should we really include them? I bet that they're inconsequential about 99.9% of the time, and it only leads to more inconsistent (since nobody seems to bother to keep a consistent number of decimal digits) and cramped formatting (since, well, decimal digits take up extra space...)... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 18:52, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

I feel like I saw them in previous templates, but I'm more than happy to round up if you think that's best. (Though I will just highlight the irony of us putting multiple decimal places for percentage and not for fractional votes, LOL) Bkissin (talk) 19:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Well, 0.01% of 40,000-50,000 votes is a few people; 0.1 "votes" out of 40,000-50,000 is, well, far less than 0.01%... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:05, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

And also, an example of why fractional votes can make the formatting go bonkers (in this case, far too wide...) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:29, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Oh, I absolutely see your point (and it's more me being silly than anything else). Though, 23 counts is going to be wide regardless ;) Bkissin (talk) 19:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Well, now it just manages to squeeze by on my not particularly wide laptop screen, so I'd say that was a success :) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:03, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Also RTE has them already rounded so if that makes things go faster. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:33, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Jane Kovarikova

Hi Bkissin,

Thank you for the feedback on the article.

I completely understand that a political candidate doesn't meet the notability guidelines, however the article only mentions her as a political candidate, but more aptly focuses on the work in child welfare advocacy as the main focus.

Would removing the mention of her current candidacy make any difference? Again, that is far from the focus of the article itself.

Please let me know, as I'm interested in learning.

cgpartridge Cgpartridge (talk) 22:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Even without mention of her candidacy, the tone of the article is written to praise and promote Kovarikova. The aim and goal of wikipedia articles is to write about their subjects in a neutral point of view. I appreciate your willingness to learn. Perhaps check out the Teahouse and see if another editor can give you some pointers. Bkissin (talk) 13:08, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

food drafts

Hey, Bkissin, just confirming that I appreciate the pings, I've been AWOL for a bit so they've kind of been foundering, but I'm working on them! valereee (talk) 18:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Hey, no worries! I remember you saying that you had other stuff and other projects going on but to tag you anyway. Take your time. I appreciate the insight! Bkissin (talk) 18:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

RE: Battle of Bakhmut (2022)

This is meant fully constructively and this isn't personal as of course I like and respect you, but the fact that you accepted this without even at least cleaning it up or Twinkle tagging it is nuts. Featuring such gems as "For 73,000 inhabitants of Bakhmut, until the beginning of the war in full force, the city remained for an hour in the city with over 20 thousand inhabitants under constant enemy attacks.", "If Russian forces are able to consolidate, it will mean operative tightening of Ukrainian troops near the area of Severodonetsk and Lisichansk. Sharpening will be incomprehensible - but only one row of tracks will remain.", and "Rescuers withdrew crowds of 6 people, their camp was huge.". It was originally draftified for a reason; major chunks of the article is borderline incomprehensible, and the rest still has other varying issues, ranging between NPOV, grammar, and source reliability. Curbon7 (talk) 22:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Good catch. I was not as thorough as I should have been. I've been trying to move away from AfC anyway. I will try to be better about looking at the prose. I was in the midst of translating the Battle of Hlukhiv article from French and that has a lot of editorializing as well. Bkissin (talk) 22:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Why did you decline my article

why>>? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:CB00:2613:6600:6D4B:3F37:C1C2:F845 (talk) 14:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

There are no sources that show that this random hacker is notable. Plus, it reads like it's mostly just a teenager. Bkissin (talk) 15:38, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Western Maryland J-1 Class

I noticed you accepted this AfC draft today, even though it did not include a single reliable source in the references section (everything there is WP:UGC and/or WP:SPS). Why did you accept the article in this state? Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Draft Article

Hi. Thank you for taking the time to review and approve my article. I have a second article about a deceased person and he's also a notable person per Wikipedia and it's in Draft now. In that article, sometimes, I used the references at the end of a paragraph instead of putting the same reference after each material statement or a sentence. This is the link to the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Abdulahad_AbdulNour.SULNOUR (talk) 02:17, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

List_of_Ponzi_schemes#2010-onwards

Moved article on EIA to the list of post-2010 ponzi schemes on wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ponzi_schemes#2010-onwards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abacus1010nyc (talk • contribs) 00:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Much better idea! Good thinking! Thanks for all your hard work. Bkissin (talk) 00:39, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Hammond Gazette & Il Risorgimento Italiano Nel Maryland

Hello Bkissin,

I saw that the draft for the Hammond Gazette has been declined for the criteria of not meeting enough different sources, so I will get to work on that, but I felt like there was a discrepancy in your criteria for denying it. You approved a similar article (Il Risorgimento Italiano Nel Maryland) that cited a different part of the same project, yet denied this one. As I'm still learning, I was wondering what exactly the difference between these two drafts were so that I might avoid it in the future.

Thanks,

Brendan

Breich9 (talk) 19:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Part of it is the number of sources. Usually I look for at least three, but definitely the more (and better quality) the better. I notice now that the Il Riso. article cites almost exclusively from the Chronicling America project. We also want diversity of quality sources. Chronicling America and the NEH/LOC are decent sources, but what is said about the newspaper elsewhere in history? What is said about the paper in the academic sphere? Take a look at Wikipedia:Articles with a single source and Wikipedia:Reliable sources for more information. I definitely understand that finding newspaper sources about other newspapers is a wild goose chase in and of itself, but I know you'll figure it out. Bkissin (talk) 19:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Understood. Would citing Chronicling America (i.e. the article about the paper) and then the digitized versions of the paper itself be acceptable as two distinct sources? I'm trying to track down some books in the library here for some other citations, so hopefully I can get those up soon.

On a tangential topic, perhaps you might have some advice. Would a list page documenting newspapers digitized and made accessible through CA be of any value? Would it be more appropriate for the Chronicling America page itself? My only concern is that it could potentially become quite long as an addendum to that page...

In any case, thanks.

Brendan

Breich9 (talk) 20:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

That's a tough one. I would suggest asking the folks over at the Teahouse. Having multiple perspectives may be helpful. Bkissin (talk) 15:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Roger Winter artist article submission

Dear Bkissin, Thank you for your comments regarding the article on Roger Winter, American artist Gallodrow (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2022 (UTC)being declined. Will work on rewriting per recommendations and will resubmit. Kathy Gallodrow

Draft submission: Jacob Kmatz

Hi, I was just reaching out to ask why my draft was declined. I understand notability but I was just making sure there was nothing wrong with my formatting. I added a little to give more notability. Thank you.

NM Papamurph42 (talk) 22:18, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

KTZT-CD and KTUO-LD

The reliable sources are accurate, what do you mean not adequately supported by reliable sources? Please help, or I'll kiss those articles goodbye. WhiplashLock2000 (talk) 14:37, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

LOL don't say it like it's a threat! I could care less if the articles are there or not.

That being said, the biggest issues with the sourcing are that they are 1. Mostly database sources proving the channels exist 2. Not in-depth sources 3. The number of sources (I'm usually looking for at least three quality sources). Bkissin (talk) 15:12, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

don't threaten me with a good time PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:20, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Consider the articles kissed goodbye via G5. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:50, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Draft:NFTStudio24

Hello Bkissin,

I hope you are fine. I am trying my best to create this article and add reliable sources. Kindly review and let me know your valuable remarks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:NFTStudio24

Regards

Kyle Kyle154 (talk) 11:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Operation Guerguerat (2020) copyvios

Hi, just a friendly reminder to check for copyright violations before accepting AfC drafts. There were some significant copyvios that slipped through in your recent review of Operation Guerguerat (2020). As shown here, nearly the entire article was copied and pasted from various sources. I removed the infringing text and requested revision deletion; please be more careful reviewing in the future. ComplexRational (talk) 16:51, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Vaishnava1/sandbox

Hello, Bkissin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Vaishnava1/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC).

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anu Valia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page College Humor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

note on a unique cobblestone and octagon house

Hi. If you cared to promote Draft:James Coolidge Octagon House, I would appreciate that. There's been brief discussion at Draft talk:James Coolidge Octagon House. I could develop it further, later, and/or it would be nice if you cared to, but i personally don't think that's strictly necessary and I'd like to see an assessment signifying Wikipedia-notability of topic, as it is now. --Doncram (talk) 15:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

FYI

this cannot be trusted. It's blatant blackhat SEO capitalizing on a decades old, defunct african american publication and is run by a really shitty PR company. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:14, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, you know me better than that! It ain't going nowhere! Thanks for the heads-up! Bkissin (talk) 18:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

I honestly can't figure out just WTF the creator is up to based on this conversation not only did he add it to the dab himself and a minute later revert it as if he hadn't added it, he is also the sole creator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Could be a case of PAID/UPE where the editor knew the article probably wouldn't pass GNG/NOT and needed proof for their client that it wasn't going to happen without RS or whatever? Bkissin (talk) 18:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

I have no clue to be honest. It's one of the weirder behaviors I've seen. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Actually, I'm pretty sure the account is compromised now. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:30, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Philip Burnell

Hello, what more does this draft need to be accepted? He already has an in-depth Polygon article, several GameRevolution and Gamerant articles, and was addressed in a tumblr blog by a senior Kotaku journalist of the time, Patrick Klepek. Furthermore, the DarksydePhil moniker has 207,000 hits on google. WarningMatrix (talk) 13:49, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks for approving my AfC submission Sides-Daren? (talk) 13:05, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Sophia Gholz

Thank you for your feedback. Changes were made to this submission following guidelines. References, interviews, media and appearances were added or amended. Create2--!3FG (talk) 16:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Nataša Pirc Musar

Thank you for your helpful comment. I agree with you, a person is not notable "automatically" for being a candidate. I removed the mention of her candidacy from the lead paragraph and added information about numerous notable cases and books. This person is notable for her work and political posts over the last two decades, not for the candidacy. Could you please review and reconsider. Topjur01 (talk) 14:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Talk pages of biographies

Hi Bkissin - this is a quick regarding Talk:Mathilda Blanchard, where you added WikiProject banners (thank you!) but since the article is biographical, it should have had a WikiProject Biography banner added as well. It might have been an oversight in this particular example, but I thought I'd write you about it, just in case you didn't know. Cheers! PKT(alk) 12:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Six Flags Hurricane Harbor Chicago

Hello! I see you've speedy deleted the redirect for Hurricane Harbor Chicago to move the draft into the mainspace, and I'd just like to thank you. from yours truly, Harobouri ^{T • C} 20:31, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Special message

Good day!

This is to express my gratitude to User:Bkissin for its contributions on this draft-turned-article 1967 Cavite bus crash. Its acceptance is not only the accomplishment of mine, but this credit is also yours, along with other editors. Being the creator of the article, i recognize editors' efforts as they matter, how big or small it is; this wouldn't be possible without you and your works.

Hoping you'll achieve and accomplish more in this site. Keep up your good work! Long live Wikipedia!—Raider000 (talk) 05:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Template Message Tony Abeyta

Hello, There are no opinions on this page, just facts about life, education and awards for Tony Abeyta. How do I remove the template message? BradSutor (talk) 22:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Draft:2022 Italian general election in Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol

Please confirm my page: "Draft:2022 Italian general election in Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol" the election was a week ago Braganza (talk) 20:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Draft:I. D. Fairchild State Forest

You requested a mainspace page be deleted to make room for this acceptance, but didn't actually accept it. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:00, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

LOL relax. I don't get any notifications that a page has been deleted, so I have to check from time to time. It has been taken care of now. Bkissin (talk) 16:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Cassidy House in SD

Hi, thanks for contacting me re this article. Please see my comment/request at its Talk page. FYI, additional sourcing available includes File:Cassidy_House_(Rapid_City,_South_Dakota).JPG (a photo of house before its original color scheme was restored). And there is this at Flickr, which is possibly copyvio posting of a photo from the National Register nomination, and with possibly plagiarized/inadequately sourced text. But further there will exist local and/or state-level news coverage of its original listing, and other news coverage which I am pretty sure I can dig up in "Newspaper Archive" literature searching which I recently got up to speed with, and/or Newspapers.com searching which I am about to apply for access to be able to use. As I state at the Talk, I would prefer to improve the article in mainspace (and I hereby commit to you to do so), which is largely because I think the contributor (who is apparently the owner of the house, per their userpage) should be affirmed for their contribution as being good enough already. --Doncram (talk) 17:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

P.S. Actually the Flickr contributor is apparently the office of the historic preservation department of the state of South Dakota, and there is statement that they uploaded only photos taken by SD employees, which they would have copyright ownership of, so their posting of photo is probably okay. Probably also about the text, which may well appear in the NRHP nomination document but if so they probably wrote it themselves and have copyright ownership. I will address this further and document at the South Dakota section of wp:NRHPHELP, for which i think wp:NRHPHELPSD should be a shortcut. --Doncram (talk) 17:24, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Canoeing (war crime)

Hi mate, thanks for pointing out a flaw in my draft page. I assume the problematic section was the phrase "A possible explanation for this is that bin Laden's remains were mutilated by canoeing after the photo was taken" as I have no source for that claim specifically (note: I have now changed the paragraph wording to be clearer and less speculative).

I should clarify that while I haven't come across any secondary sources which specifically link the information I wrote about, the speculation that bin Laden's body was canoed is a very common one and present in one of the sources in my article (which I also referenced in the section). I have added the source to an earlier section of the paragraph to make the connection more clear. Tell me if the new version is any good once you've looked at it, if not let me know where I'm going wrong. Still new to editing so the feedback is much appreciated.

Cheers, Au489 (talk) 11:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Erroneously accepted AfC submission

You didn't notice that IndependênciaS was translated from pt:Independências without credit or attribution. This is common and should be checked for to ensure that copyvio is not making its way into Wikipedia. (t · c) buidhe 16:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Soup Kitchen (La Soupe Populaire de Casablanca)

Hi Bkissin,

On  16:02, 17 October 2022 you reformatted citations from the References of the article. It makes the citations text lighter; however it has a problem, many books I quote are e-books (mainly Kindle) or sometimes PDF,  I do not  always have the paper version. Therefore, the paper page number is unknown to me and I am not in position to give the requested location of the text I quote. One solution is to explicitly write in the reference the text I quote in italic. I propose to do that only on e-books, for the remaining sources, I will provide page, and line number of the selected text. Please let me know whether this solution is acceptable. Thanks

DanielSuraqui Danielsuraqui (talk) 17:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Egyptian involvement in the Syrian Civil War

Hello, Bkissin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Egyptian involvement in the Syrian Civil War, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

A page you started (Manon Blanchet) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Manon Blanchet, Bkissin!

Wikipedia editor MB298 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating!

To reply, leave a comment on MB298's talk page.

Learn more about page curation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

—Kingofthedead (talk • contribs) 02:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft: Miss Avakin

Hi. i hope i am not being rude. but you declined my article and i have added references. I am new here so please don't delete simply decline again and i would keep on trying. Thank you

Thanks!! TristanNdianga (talk)

—TristanNdianga (talk • contribs) 10:11, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Maccabi USA Wikipedia Page

I cited CharityNavigator on the first paragraph and am still editing the rest of the page.

Talk hartilli — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]]) 

—Hartilli (talk • contribs) 15:49, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Declined Draft:Aqua Mail is up-dated. Please review it again.

Hi Bikissin,

I have added more reference sourses to the Aqua Mail draft page. Could you please review it again?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aqua_Mail

Best regards and thank you for your time,

Wiki The Author

16:36 18 September 2018

—Wiki The Author(UTYC) (talk • contribs) 14:35, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Declined Draft: Diane Giraud

Hi Bkissin,

My draft has been rejected for Copyright material but I don't see which content you refer to. Can you give me more details? Some content comes from official FB page of the Artist (which is copyright free content) and we got her approval for that anyway.

Thanks for your help, RA —Raoul Alexandre (talk • contribs) 13:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

I asked for help.

—Tealdrizzle (talk • contribs) 01:40, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Question regard Draft:John_Christopher_Muran

Hi Bkissin, I am a doctoral candidate working with Dr. Muran and trying to create a page for him. I have edited the page in response to the comments (i.e. paraphrasing, citation, & publication section). Would you mind take a look when you get a chance to see if it's better now? Thank you! -Di

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:John_Christopher_Muran

—Tealdrizzle (talk • contribs) 01:40, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Your Reason for Declining Dawn Smith Jordan draft

You said, "Being a Miss America runner-up is not notability..." which seems inconsistent with existing pages on Wikipedia. For example, as I look at the list of other Miss South Carolina winners in Wikipedia, there a number of former winners with their own pages and most have their chief measure of notability as winning Miss South Carolina. Note that you have to win Miss South Carolina to even compete in Miss America, and Dawn Smith was a finalist in Miss America. A good specific example is Ali Rogers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Rogers). Ali Rogers has nothing more on her page other than winning beauty pageants, the most significant being Miss South Carolina and also was a finalist in Miss America. She did not sing in a Billy Graham crusade, hasn't recorded songs, written books, have an active ministry throughout the United States, and so forth. I intend to continue to add to the draft providing additional items of notability, but the above comment by itself is inconsistent with what I already see approved on Wikipedia. My assumption is it will eventually get approved as I document more, but I contend it should already be approved based on what I see on Ali Rogers' page.

—Dlee1964 (talk • contribs) 22:48, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Review

Hello, Bkission. I have seen your reviews about my draft. But in fact, I did not find the same topic with me and all of them pay attention to the whole information, which is not same as mine- use. Thank you

—Yche3321 (talk • contribs) 12:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi

I believe my article should not have been rejected, I have cited as much as possible. I really need that page to be live for school. Lerato Kganyago or may you please guide me on where Im going wrong cause I dont see anything wrong with my article

—Sandisiwe Mkhize (talk • contribs) 14:57, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Windsor Tablelands

Hi Bkissin,

I've made the changes now for the draft page for review: "Windsor Tablelands", and added a good lead section for the article. Hope this is sufficient! I was also just wanting to ask a question about changing the title of the page, upon greater investigation the geographical location is more commonly known as the 'Mount Windsor Tableland' as opposed to the 'Windsor Tablelands'.

Best Regards, Mcat963 —Mcat963 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft: priyadarshi ranjan article deleted

—JunoSanghera (talk • contribs) 09:32, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Nathaniel Phillips Submision Declined

Ok did not know thanks.

—2a02:c7f:9616:2800:6042:f334:ebf5:ca2e (talk • contribs) 12:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Spiceheads

Please can you explain in lay mens English whats wrong with this? Spiceheads is the worlds leading brandname for information, help and advice to the public about NPS, that has sold many pix and videos to News agencys that have been published without accredication. It comes up hits 1,2 and 3 in Google and Bing when you serch the term Spiceheads and has provided cited information, advice and photographs to the Sunday Times. I just do not understand what is wrong, most of it refairs back to the cited main article in Vice and I have asked for help to connect up the citations, but no one has offered. I am both phisically and mentaly disabled, as you should be able to tell by my spelling and grammer. Instead of just rejecting it over and over, why will one of you intelegent accademics help an old guy with dementia? Is it because I am disabled that I am being treated in this way? Or is it the subject matter? All in all I am bewildered in a page that openly says that anyone, can publish or edit somthing, when clearly it is realy anyone with a degree in English that's part of the club. Not having a go at you personally, just very upset, almost suisidal that no one will halp me and I am being treated this way

—Taylor4567 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Regarding outright Rejection to publish an article about a renowned Professor

Hi, Dear moderator Bkissin I have sent a small introduction about a scientist that you have rejected. In my opinion, this is a very and biased action. Rupesh Chaturvedi has contributed much in the medical field that is benefiting to the science community and it will give more benefit in the future. If you are writing an article about a person who has not given anything this world like (I can give you many examples) and at the same time declining a person who has a number of research articles/papers in the famous journal like PNAS, Cell, Nature, present on PubMed cited by approx 50000 times. Besides this as per I know He is the most cited scientist of India's Top Ranked Jawaharlal Nehru university, that you can see Rupesh Chaturvedi google scholar citation. He is also Director of R&D of JNU New Delhi that you can see on JNU website. Rupesh Chaturvedi is in USA Washington DC and already started a Big Startup project in the medical field. It was my first article and now it was last also. Public opinion that I have listened about the biases of Wikipedia, I got it to be correct. This is the respect what we as a researcher get from the common people for whom we worked for day and night.

Thank you very much, Mr. Bkissin Achyut Pandey Research scholar JNU New Delhi

—Achyut1 (talk • contribs) 01:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Nathaniel Phillips Submision Resubmitted

He has made a senior appearance for VFB Stuttgart in the DFB Pokal so I have resubmitted the draft. and also added some references.
User:2A02:C7F:9616:2800:414F:2913:8C11:AF64 (talk) 10:52, 14 August 2019 (GMT)

—2A02:C7F:9616:2800:414F:2913:8C11:AF64 (talk • contribs) 10:55, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:In Chang-soo

Hi, When do you finish review of Draft:In Chang-soo He definately meets the WP:NFOOTY

Footwiks (talk)

—Footwiks (talk • contribs) 17:28, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft: Zain Ouadah

Hello Bkissin, how are you ?

I just want to tell you that I saw your comment on the :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zain_Ouadah

Many boxers have and are still accepted despite these criteria. Several sources have been added in recent days. I really think this boxer is eligible for publication on Wikipedia. I registered on Wikipedia a few months ago and I hope you can review your decision, it would encourage me to create other pages.

Thank you

Andy12349 (talk)

—Andy12349 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)