User talk:Aziz Kingrani

Welcome!

Hello, Aziz Kingrani, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Shiva Temple Johi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TopCipher 11:26, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shiva Temple Johi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shiva Temple Johi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.dawn.com/news/741594/heritage-the-temple-of-shiva. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TopCipher 11:26, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shiva Temple Johi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Aziz Kingrani. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. — Train2104 (t • c) 21:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Johi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Johi was changed by Aziz Kingrani (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2017-03-08T17:36:42+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gobindram Darbar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gobindram Darbar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — O Fortuna!^{Imperatrix mundi.} 17:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Johi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Johi was changed by Aziz Kingrani (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854496 on 2017-03-17T15:00:03+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wahi Pandhi

Wahi Pandhi https://tribune.com.pk/story/1151980/wahi-pandhi-woes-oil-company/ is litle town near Gorakh hills https://www.samaa.tv/blogs/2017/01/gorakh-hill-the-magical-peak-in-pictures/ in Dadu https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dadu,_Pakistan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dadu,_Pakistan Districthttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dadu_District of Sindh.

Speedy deletion nomination of Aziz Kingrani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aziz Kingrani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Train2104 (t • c) 02:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aziz Kingrani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aziz Kingrani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aziz Kingrani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 16:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Aziz Kingrani. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 16:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself

Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a place like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography.

Wikipedia user pages are not like those at social-networking sites. Their use is explained at WP:NOTWEBHOST:

"Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account."

You can find out more about Wikipedia at the WP:Welcome page and the WP:Introduction. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Manjhand

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Aziz Kingrani, thanks for creating Manjhand!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating this. Wikipedia cannot be used as a reference, nor general Google. Please see if you can add any more WP:RELIABLESOURCES.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 12:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to insert more citations--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 06:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ustad Bukhari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dadu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Thanks--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 15:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

it is requested that the actual and local name of Kirthar Mountains is Khirthar. There are many references or citations regarding the name "Khirthar". Thus it must be corrected.--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 10:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wahi Pandhi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sindhi, Johi and Amri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amri is recorded archaeological site in Sindh Pakistan while Johi is a town and tehsil of Dadu District, Sindh Pakistan. Also Sindhi is a language os Sindh, a southern province of Pakistan. However, I Will try to include acceptable links regarding your instructions

--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 10:54, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kingrani

Hello Aziz Kingrani,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kingrani for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This page Kingrani should not be speedily deleted because Kingrani clan widely lives in Pakistan, India and other countries of the world. Ethnically, this clan belongs to Indo-Aryan clans of Indian sub-continent. This page should remain on Wikipedia as pages of other clans, tribes, surnames and sub-castes are on Wikipedia. I shall improve it with citations.--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 12:46, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On other hand it is not user's personal interest but it is information about a clan for Wikipedia.--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 13:23, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mai Allah Wassai

The article Mai Allah Wassai has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Saqib (talk) 19:23, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Mai Allah Wassai was most popular and legendary Sindhi folk and light classical singer of Sindh. The legendary artists must be given space.The reliable references have been cited. It is requested not to delete it. It will be improved with more reliable sources --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 20:01, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ancient graves in Wahi Pandhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baloch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The link has been fixed baloch gabar and Persian--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 10:20, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rafiq Ahmed Jamali, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 14:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Its ok I shall follow guidelines in future. Thanks .. --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 14:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Honorable Saqib (talk) Neither his father nor Rafiq Jamali remained member of PML-N . However his father went to General Election with out party in 1985 and became failed. From 1988 his father remained in PPPP. On other hand NA-178 Dadu-II constituency was before 1988. in 1999 Rafiq Jamali had not contested General election. May Kindly be pleased to correct. Thanks ... --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 15:18, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly are you trying to say? I nowhere mentioned that Jamali was part of PML-N. Saqib (talk) 15:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Entry of constituency. in 1997 the constituency was NA-232 Dadu-II instead of NA-178 Dadu- and he defeated PML-Q candidate ..--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 15:36, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) You're misreading. I nowhere mentioned that Jamali was a member of PML-N. I would suggest you read carefully what I wrote. And by the way delimitation of constituencies was done in 2002. Prior to 2002, constituency NA-232 was NA-178. Jamali ran in the 1993 and 1997 general election as an independent candidate and lost both elections, to Haji Mohammad Bakhsh Jamali, a candidate of PPP. --Saqib (talk) 15:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ghulam Shah Jeelani, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 17:36, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Saqib kindly consider over my editing and adding. I shall cite RS and information. Thanks...--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 17:44, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite a RS as soon you add material to a BLP. I have added a RS for now. --Saqib (talk) 17:45, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Saqib according to election record the date of birth of Rafiq Ahmed Jamali is December 25 1967 which is actual birth date. May kindly be pleased to help for correcting it. Thanks date. https://elections.com.pk/candidatedetails.php?id=1629 ...--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 08:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a RS therefore we cannot cite it on a BLP. Sorry! --Saqib (talk) 08:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok dearSaqib but actual date of birth is 25 December 1967. furthermore, I shall try to search for RS.Thanks..--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 08:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid we cannot change the DoB until some RS is cited. --Saqib (talk) 08:48, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I am agreed. I shall discuss and RS will be sent here for your kind consideration before citation --- --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 08:56, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure and next time try to not edit using IP addresses. See Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. --Saqib (talk) 09:56, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rest a sure I shall not edit. I have not any personal interest regarding this person. Don't afraid please. I shall not touch it without your kind suggestions and directions. If you do not want to edit I shall left it and never touch it. Thanks -----Aziz Kingrani (talk) 12:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think you misunderstood me. I never said you should not edit the page, unless you have some COI. Feel free to edit the page but please try not to edit using IP address because it is generally prohibited and cite RS. --Saqib (talk) 13:04, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK dear Saqib thanks a lot. Regards-------Aziz Kingrani (talk) 13:08, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ghazi Shah Mound, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DPL bot the link has been corrected. Thanks-----Aziz Kingrani (talk) 10:46, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aziz Kingrani. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ishaq Samejo

Hello, Aziz Kingrani,

Thanks for creating Ishaq Samejo! I edit here too, under the username Lopifalko and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Needs independent reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lopifalko}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lopifalko (talk) 10:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ishaq Samejo is prominent poet writer and professor of University of Sindh including director of Institute of Sindhology. I shall try to cite reliable citations....--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 10:50, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ustad Bukhari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dadu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit and conflict of interest

This is a very exciting discovery, but for archaeological issues we should not rely on the media or breaking news but wait until there's a peer reviewed report, and even then we'd prefer secondary academic sources discussing it. This is particularly important if you are suggesting something possibly groundbreaking, which your discovery seems to be.

There's also the issue of conflict of interest, please see WP:COI. Where it comes to your own work, you really should be suggesting its use on the article's talk page.

Did you know that we have a WP:WikiProject Archaeology? Doug Weller talk 12:21, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

-- It is submitted that I am agreed with all the rules and regulations of the Wikipedia...--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 13:09, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Aziz Kingrani

Thank you for creating Mai Gulan.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article. It appears that many sources that discuss Mai Gulan actually cover the tomb building, so perhaps this article should have more about the tomb as an architectural work and historic site.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:06, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am grateful for such appreciation. I shall try to improve the article... --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Syed Gaji Shah

A tag has been placed on Syed Gaji Shah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

lack of notability

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 07:42, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the Speedy deletion tag by yourself it will be remove by an administrator of Wikipedia Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 07:42, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Moomal Ji Mari

Hello, Aziz Kingrani. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moomal Ji Mari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC) ... Hnorable (talk) I shall try to re-edit Momal ji Mari... --103.228.156.84 (talk) 11:32, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

.. I shall try to re-edit it. Regards.. --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 11:36, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great work. Please, continue your work on biographies. Störm (talk) 14:13, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

.. I am grateful for such appricition and reward.. --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 14:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Qazi Faiz Muhammad moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Qazi Faiz Muhammad, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses ^{(talk) (contribs)} _{Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page} 19:00, 20 March 2020 (UTC) --- Kindly, submit it as an article. I shall include reliable sources of reference--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 19:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly review and connect this draft article as an article on Wikimedia Aziz Kingrani (talk) 20:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Hameed Akhund moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Abdul Hameed Akhund, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I shall try to add more citations from reliable and independent sources Aziz Kingrani (talk) 11:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Qazi Faiz Muhammad has been accepted

Qazi Faiz Muhammad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Hammad (Talk!) 02:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--- I shall remain very thankful for kindness to create and review the article Qazi Faiz Muhammad. I shall try to edit at my best levels----Aziz Kingrani (talk) 07:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Hyder Ali Leghari, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. In particular, please see MOS:FONTSIZE. Miniapolis 19:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---Right I shall follow the instructions. Truth is that I am untrained an creating or editing arties on my own knowledge. No one is here for training me. However, I shall follow your instructions. My more articles are pending for review. Regards--Aziz Kingrani (talk) 04:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taj Sehrai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shikarpur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edited as Shikarpur Aziz Kingrani (talk) 06:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hi, thanks for contributing. Please note that common terms, years, dates, etc, are not normally linked on en.WP. Tony (talk) 02:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for appreciation. I shall follow your kind instructions. Regards Aziz Kingrani (talk) 04:28, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Hameed Akhund and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abdul Hameed Akhund, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 03:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--Thanks a lot I shall continue editing till the article will be reviewed --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 07:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iqbal Jogi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iqbal Jogi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iqbal Jogi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 15:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Akbar Laghari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akbar Laghari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akbar Laghari (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 16:01, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---Being a writer and critic of Sindhi Language Akbar Laghari is a popular and his books are published. Whereas, the independent and reliable sources and references are included as well. Your kind honour is requested to consider over your suggestion for deletion. I think it is written according to the policies of Wikipedia. Regards... --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 18:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. It is not. --Saqib (talk) 18:54, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir, I shall try to follow the policies. Regards Aziz Kingrani (talk) 19:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghuos Bux Brohi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghuos Bux Brohi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghuos Bux Brohi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 16:04, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--Honorable sir, I shall try to include more reliable and independent sources and references. I shall try to improve it as well. Here is tragedy with our prominent assets that neither the journalists and newspapers in English language including Sindhi language are appearing their biological information nor our cocened departments or institutions publish their biography. Ghuos Bux Brohi is pride of performance award holder artist which is national reward of Pakistan for a person. I request that the article of Ghuos Bux Brohi should remain published and may kindly be pleased not to suggest for deletion. Regards... --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 17:57, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Aziz Kingrani. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Akbar Laghari, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 18:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir, honestly speaking that I am not technically sound. I try to include information. No one is with me to tell me the policies or techniques of editing. I understand you instruction that article should not be as promoting some one. I shall follow your kind instructions in future. Regars Aziz Kingrani (talk) 19:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your created articles

Please keep on creating more articles on Pakistani musicians. I enjoy working on them, too. You might have already noticed that I also joined in with you later to add Infoboxes, Pride of Performance Award templates to your created articles – Ghous Bux Brohi, Misri Khan Jamali and Khamiso Khan. My Salaams and appreciation for your efforts...Ngrewal1 (talk) 18:42, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ngrewal1 (talk) I am highly grateful to your kindness and for such appriciation. I always have tried to create pages of such notable artists and musicians. I shall try in future as well... --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 06:33, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jam Mubarak Khan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jam Mubarak Khan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 20:12, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jam Mubarak Khan (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jam Mubarak Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jam Mubarak Khan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aziz Kingrani! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly submit the article for creation I will try to improve and include citations Aziz Kingrani (talk) 20:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Hameed Akhund (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KartikeyaS343 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Hameed Akhund and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abdul Hameed Akhund, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KartikeyaS (talk) 06:57, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

... (talk).. kindly consider over the page, I shall try to improve with reliable and independent sources. Regard... --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 10:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Abdul Hameed Akhund has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Abdul Hameed Akhund. Thanks! KartikeyaS (talk) 06:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jam Mubarak Khan has been accepted

Jam Mubarak Khan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 21:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DGG ( talk ) I am thankful and so happy for your kind consideration. I shall try for the best of the Wikimedia..... --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 17:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DGG ( talk ) The poet Imdad Hussaini is alive who belongs to Sindh, Pakistan but Imdad Hussain 'Imdad' is passed away at the age of 80, kindly page of Imdad Hussaini must be edited and corrected --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 07:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DGG ( talk ) the link of Imdad Hussain Imdad of Gilgit Baltistan is given below --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 07:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.reachladakh.com/news/city-buzz/balti-poet-imdad-hussain-imdad-passes-away

the article should be changed, but you can - and should-- edit it yourself, making suret o add the reference also. DGG ( talk ) 16:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Abdul Hameed Akhund

Hello, Aziz Kingrani. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abdul Hameed Akhund".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

United States Ian {talk) I shall try to work further on draft Abdul Hameed Akhund Thanks... --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I restored Draft:Abdul Hameed Akhund so that you may work on it some more. wbm1058 (talk) 17:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hakim Ali Shah Bukhari moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hakim Ali Shah Bukhari, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. In addition, there is a WP:COI or WP:UPE issue.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the COI/UPE issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Do not move it back into mainspace yourself.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:18, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hakim Ali Shah Bukhari (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It has numerous sources but unfortunately, they are unreliable. Only DAWN.COM is a reliable source and rest publications appears blogs and wikis. Please provide one or two more independent reliable sources to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hakim Ali Shah Bukhari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hakim Ali Shah Bukhari, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:18, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Village Gaha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Village Gaha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maniik ^{🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me.} 11:29, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I shall try to improve it with reliable sources Aziz Kingrani (talk) 11:38, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Village Gaha (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it will almost certainly be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a partial block may be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This draft does not establish that the village satisfies geographic notability, and in particular does not establish that it is a legally recognized named place with a population.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Village Gaha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Village Gaha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:58, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Madad Ali Sindhi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Madad Ali Sindhi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 20:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Madad Ali Sindhi is Pakistani presidential pride of performance award holder writer. Furthermore I shall try to improve his profile Aziz Kingrani (talk) 18:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Madad Ali Sindhi is Pakistani presidential pride of performance award holder writer. Kindly consider over this which is high recognition and notability for a writer. Furthermore I shall try to improve his profile. Aziz Kingrani (talk) 18:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madad Ali Sindhi has been accepted

Madad Ali Sindhi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 23:27, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be very grateful for the for creating article Madad Ali Sindhi. I shall try to edit it and contribute more as possible... --Aziz Kingrani (talk) 10:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Village Gaha

Hello, Aziz Kingrani. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Village Gaha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:20, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hakim Ali Shah Bukhari

Hello, Aziz Kingrani. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hakim Ali Shah Bukhari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Village Gaha

Hello, Aziz Kingrani. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Village Gaha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Pakistan floods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mehar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Akbar Laghari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akbar Laghari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akbar Laghari (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 16:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]