User talk:Adityavagarwal/Archives/2019/February
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Adityavagarwal. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:48, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
WikiCup 2019 Reminder
Hi. I'm DannyS712 (talk), and I just wanted to remind you that you have signed up to compete in this year's WikiCup! There are about 2 weeks left before the first round ends – if you haven't yet made your first submission, there is still time to start; if you have already started, keep up the good work. See your submissions page: here. Good luck!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:44, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
March 2019 at Women in Red
March 2019, Volume 5, Issue 3, Numbers 107, 108, 112, 113
Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:50, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
25 DYK Medal
The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal | ||
I am proud to present this medal to Adityavagarwal for having 25 articles featured at Did you know section on the main page of Wikipedia. Congratulation on such a rare accomplishment; less than 450 of Wikipedia's millions of editors have received this award throughout the site's 18-year history. Your contributions to Wikipedia are greatly appreciated. Damien Linnane (talk) 07:10, 28 January 2019 (UTC) |
- Hi, I notice you have also listed yourself with 25 nominations under Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs#DYK nominations list. Is that a typo? I'm unable to find your DYK nominations anywhere. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 00:13, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yoninah Hey! Actually, I am really confused about the difference between the first and the second table. Now that I have rechecked the page, most of the DYK creators I know have their names in the first table instead of the second table, so I have removed my name now. Also, could you please tell me the difference between creation and nomination? As far as I understand, one nominates a DYK for which one improves the article to meet the DYK criteria. So, creating a DYK would also contain the process of nominating it, right? Although, I might be way too off, so could you correct my understanding? Adityavagarwal (talk) 09:42, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- "Creation" means you wrote or significantly improved the article, and "expansion" means you contributed to its 5x expansion. (More than one editor can receive a creation/expansion credit for an article.) With an article you created/expanded, you can nominate it yourself or wait for someone else to nominate it. If you nominate it, you list yourself as "creator" and leave the nominator parameter blank on the submission template. Then you will receive a DYK creation credit. If you nominate someone else's article, you list the other editor as creator and you as nominator on the template. You can also see the difference in the size and color of the box that the DYK bot leaves on your page. All the DYK credits you currently have are creation credits – light yellow boxes that fill the width of the talk page. See here for an example of nomination credits – dark orange boxes that are smaller. Does that help? Yoninah (talk) 14:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yoninah Thank you very much for your clear explanation! I apologize for my misunderstanding. I now understand the difference between creation and nomination. I was not aware that others could nominate a DYK which they had not created, so I felt that creation of a DYK automatically entailed nomination by the same user. Anyways, thank you again for your explanation!
- "Creation" means you wrote or significantly improved the article, and "expansion" means you contributed to its 5x expansion. (More than one editor can receive a creation/expansion credit for an article.) With an article you created/expanded, you can nominate it yourself or wait for someone else to nominate it. If you nominate it, you list yourself as "creator" and leave the nominator parameter blank on the submission template. Then you will receive a DYK creation credit. If you nominate someone else's article, you list the other editor as creator and you as nominator on the template. You can also see the difference in the size and color of the box that the DYK bot leaves on your page. All the DYK credits you currently have are creation credits – light yellow boxes that fill the width of the talk page. See here for an example of nomination credits – dark orange boxes that are smaller. Does that help? Yoninah (talk) 14:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yoninah Hey! Actually, I am really confused about the difference between the first and the second table. Now that I have rechecked the page, most of the DYK creators I know have their names in the first table instead of the second table, so I have removed my name now. Also, could you please tell me the difference between creation and nomination? As far as I understand, one nominates a DYK for which one improves the article to meet the DYK criteria. So, creating a DYK would also contain the process of nominating it, right? Although, I might be way too off, so could you correct my understanding? Adityavagarwal (talk) 09:42, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you
To A Special Wikipedian | |
You are such a sweetie, there is so much I'd like to say but the words escape me. You are a Wikifriend to many because of your big heart, and the kindness and consideration you show others. Thank you for nominating me but above all, thank you for being you. ❤️ Atsme✍🏻📧 17:12, 17 February 2019 (UTC) |
- Atsme Thank you for your kind words! Due to your profound contributions to Wikipedia, you deserved the highest level awards. As I went through the list of people who received that Editor of the Week award, I was really astounded to see that you had not received it yet! So, I stole the opportunity to nominate you myself. There were innumerable reasons that I could have written to advocate the award for you. But, it would turn the nomination message into a whole Wikipedia article! So, I chose to only mention your invaluable contributions to articles on Wikipedia. Adityavagarwal (talk) 04:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- Atsme✍🏻📧 04:17, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- Adityavagarwal. Let me "hide" a big thank you here for your recent additions to the Editor Retention Project. They are much appreciated. ―Buster7 ☎ 06:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Buster7 Hey, thank you too for your immense contributions to the Editor Retention! In fact, you are the one who is working so hard to disseminate this award to other editors, so you deserve far more thanks than me! Your amazing work regarding the award is really praiseworthy as it maintains an amiable atmosphere on Wikipedia and encourages editors whilst recognizing them for their efforts! Adityavagarwal (talk) 09:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Buster7 Do you know how to check a user's GA/DYK/FA count? For Shyamal, I was not able to find any, so would you be able to help me with that? Also, in case you are able to find these details, feel free to add them to the nomination as well! Thank you! Adityavagarwal (talk) 03:23, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Buster7 Hey, thank you too for your immense contributions to the Editor Retention! In fact, you are the one who is working so hard to disseminate this award to other editors, so you deserve far more thanks than me! Your amazing work regarding the award is really praiseworthy as it maintains an amiable atmosphere on Wikipedia and encourages editors whilst recognizing them for their efforts! Adityavagarwal (talk) 09:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Adityavagarwal. Let me "hide" a big thank you here for your recent additions to the Editor Retention Project. They are much appreciated. ―Buster7 ☎ 06:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Atsme✍🏻📧 04:17, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Editor of the Week
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Damien Linnane submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week in late January:
- I nominate Adityavagarwal to be Editor of the Week for significant regular contributions, including the promotion of several notable articles to good status, two of which have since received Million Awards, as well as active participation in behind the scenes work, such as reviewing articles at FAC, participating in RfA and extensive work clearing the backlog at AfD. Not to mention constantly bringing positive vibes everywhere they go; they make Wikipedia a better place. User:Titodutta and User:Darylgolden both seconded this nomination
User:Buster7 subsequently submitted a second nomination in early February:
- Adityavagarwal came to my attention as a frequent nominator of fellow WikiPedians for the EotW award. An active editor, he has helped 45 articles become GA over the last few years. He is the recipient of the Million Award for bringing Taxonomy (biology) to GA status, and two Quarter Million Awards for bringing Columbidae and Mallard to GA status. Not only an incredible editor but a kind and thoughtful human being. User:Atsme seconded with the comment, "I am humbled and honored to refer to him as a colleague, and hope for the opportunity to collaborate with him in the near future editing articles for which we share a common interest". He was the 2017 WikiCup Winner and is a member of many important WikiProjects; the Counter-Vandalism unit, the Guild of Copy Editors, the Typo Team, Environment, Ecology, Genealogy and Invention. He is an active responder at the Teahouse, helping editors find answers to varied questions. Common loon and Brown Pelican are just couple of the many articles ADDY has improved. This award is small thanks for the many industrious contributions he has made to the encyclopedia! His hard work is recognized and appreciated.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
An Awesome Wikipedian |
Adityavagarwal |
Editor of the Week for the week beginning February 24, 2019 |
A frequent nominator of fellow WikiPedians for the EotW award. 45 GA articles. The recipient of the Million Award and two Quarter Million Awards. An incredible editor and collaborator, and a kind, thoughtful human being. The 2017 WikiCup Winner. A member of the Counter-Vandalism unit, the Guild of Copy Editors, the Typo Team, Environment, Ecology, Genealogy and Invention. Active at the Teahouse. |
Recognized for |
Industrious contributions and participation |
Notable work(s) |
Taxonomy (biology), Columbidae and Mallard |
Submit a nomination |
Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 01:48, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Damien Linnane, Buster7, Titodutta, Darylgolden, Atsme and all others, I am really, really grateful for having been awarded the Editor of the Week award. Thank you very much for considering me to be worthy of this precious and rare award! Adityavagarwal (talk) 03:29, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 03:23, 25 February 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
- Hey, Nick Moyes I was wondering if you could help count the GAs/FAs of Shy for this (see who shy is on the page)! I have counted his DYKs (1-Formiscurra) the way you said, so could you also check if I have counted it right? Also, feel free to edit there if you would like! I did not want to attract attention to the page at teahouse, as it is supposed to be a surprise for the nominee, so I have messaged you here. Adityavagarwal (talk) 08:51, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree with you - one DYK nomination, based upon this. I'll have to take a look at the EotW entry later on, if that's OK. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 09:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your help, Nick Moyes and yes it would be complete alright if you could look at the entry later on! Adityavagarwal (talk) 09:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree with you - one DYK nomination, based upon this. I'll have to take a look at the EotW entry later on, if that's OK. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 09:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 February 2019
- From the editors: Help wanted (still)
- News and notes: Front-page issues for the community
- Discussion report: Talking about talk pages
- Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Binge-watching
- Technology report: Tool labs casters-up
- Gallery: Signed with pride
- From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love
- Humour: Pesky Pronouns
Your thread has been archived
Hi Adityavagarwal! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|