User talk:Adamtt9/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Adamtt9. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
New message from Timothytyy
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurricane Tyra Black. Timothytyy (talk) 13:18, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
| New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
I disagree with your revert. Please advise how to have the "discussion" with many people involved to decide. Equinox ◑ 00:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Equinox: You will have to go ahead and start a move discussion on the page since there is a lot of edit history attached to the title the page is currently at. In order to maintain history, if it is agreed that the redirect should change targets, there needs to be an alternative redirect created so that the information currently held in the history of Spindizzy moves to somewhere else, maybe something like Spindizzy (Cities in Flight). I think it would be most appropriate to start a move discussion at the page Spindizzy (disambiguation) to see if people would agree with the video game being the primary topic. Adamtt9 (talk) 00:12, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I can't be bothered with that nonsense. I will just keep a separate redirect in my own tiny brain. But it does seem totally f'ing absurd to me that an obscure thing inside a sci-fi universe takes priority over a major top-selling video game with the exact name Spindizzy. I know by now you can't argue with the Wikipedia machine. Thanks anyway. Equinox ◑ 06:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- I looked at this and was surprised to see a revert, as an extant video game vs a relatively obscure fictional device feels like a clear application of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC! So I started a move request. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I can't be bothered with that nonsense. I will just keep a separate redirect in my own tiny brain. But it does seem totally f'ing absurd to me that an obscure thing inside a sci-fi universe takes priority over a major top-selling video game with the exact name Spindizzy. I know by now you can't argue with the Wikipedia machine. Thanks anyway. Equinox ◑ 06:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
2023 Heilbronner Neckarcup moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Heilbronner Neckarcup, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
2023 Surbiton Trophy moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Surbiton Trophy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
2023 Surbiton Trophy – Men's singles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Surbiton Trophy – Men's singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:03, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
2023 Surbiton Trophy – Men's doubles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Surbiton Trophy – Men's doubles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
2023 Heilbronner Neckarcup – Singles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Heilbronner Neckarcup – Singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:05, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
2023 Heilbronner Neckarcup – Doubles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Heilbronner Neckarcup – Doubles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:06, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
2023 UniCredit Czech Open – Doubles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 UniCredit Czech Open – Doubles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:08, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
2023 UniCredit Czech Open moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 UniCredit Czech Open, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:08, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
2023 UniCredit Czech Open – Singles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 UniCredit Czech Open – Singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:09, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
2023 Tyler Tennis Championships moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Tyler Tennis Championships, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:10, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
2023 Tyler Tennis Championships – Singles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Tyler Tennis Championships – Singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:10, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
May 2023 NPP Drive Award
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
| This award is given to Adamtt9 for collecting more than 40 points doing redirect reviews, in the May 2023 NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you for your help in bringing down the backlog. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC) |
Yaroslav Demin
Hi, Yaroslav Demin just won 2023 French Open – Boys' doubles with Rodrigo Pacheco Méndez, can you pass its article/page from draft to real article/page, thanks in advance. 2A01:CB14:11BC:CF00:E8B7:2FED:83BB:A711 (talk) 10:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Can you come to one of the Wiki iRC or Discord Channels, please ?
Hi @Adamtt9: I wanna ask you a couple of tennis-related questions in private, regarding Wikipedia pages. Tell me which channel and when you could join for a few minutes. ROTennisFan (talk) ROTennisFan (talk) 18:07, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- @ROTennisFan: In regards to your draft, the player doesn't meet the requirements set out by WP:NTENNIS. If she had participated in the main draw of a WTA event, she would have. I am not sure if she meets the more general notability guidelines WP:GNG as reviewing drafts isn't something I usually do. I would just wait until someone else reviews it to see if she meets WP:GNG. However, from a pure tennis sense, she doesn't meet project guidelines until that participation in a WTA Tour event is met. Adamtt9 (talk) 16:39, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- I know, but you and I also know that Main Draw Wild Cards many time aren't handed out based on merit. Szabó made her debut via WC. There's also another player, Ilinca Amariei, who has a page since she was below the first 1000 players in the singles WTA Rankings, with no notable results in the junior years, but received a main draw doubles WC back then (again, not based on merit) and thus she has a page for almost 2 years. Really?
- From an objective point of view, and not strictly from the WP:NTENNIS, it's pretty ironic, isn't it?
- Maybe these should be amended, given that the luck factor has an upper hand over results / notability, in some cases.
- P.S: In the WP:NTENNIS these also this: "Significant coverage is likely to exist... or can be shown to meet the wider requirements of WP:NBASIC." I put many articles in the draft, from different independent sources, and I can put more, though I'm a little afraid not to put too many.
- Could she meet the WP:NTENNIS requirements based on this, until a WTA Main Draw appearance will occur? ROTennisFan (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Your case fix reverts
I don't understand this revert and others like it. This is not a case involving prize money, unless "Challenger 90" etc. represent prize money. Should I fix it to "Hard – Challenger 90 – ..." and such? Dicklyon (talk) 15:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Dicklyon: Yes, as I feel like that keeps it in line with the new formatting introduced into articles like 2022 ATP Tour and 2022 WTA Tour, etc. The Challenger categories do correspond with prize money. Adamtt9 (talk) 16:05, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I'll handle. I tried to figure out if those were prize money designators, but I didn't find it. Dicklyon (talk) 00:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023
Hello Adamtt9,
Backlog
Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.
Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp connect on IRC.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Nomination of Ismael Alhassane for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ismael Alhassane (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol needs your help!
Hello Adamtt9,
The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.
Reminders:
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
"Mika Aarnikka" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Mika Aarnikka has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 2 § Mika Aarnikka until a consensus is reached. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Mika Aarnikka for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mika Aarnikka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
CycloneYoris talk! 01:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
2023 Zug Open moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Zug Open, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:40, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
2023 Zug Open – Doubles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Zug Open – Doubles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:40, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
2023 Zug Open – Singles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Zug Open – Singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
2023 Open Castilla y León moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Open Castilla y León, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
2023 Open Castilla y León – Singles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Open Castilla y León – Singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
2023 Internazionali di Tennis Città di Verona – Doubles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Internazionali di Tennis Città di Verona – Doubles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
2023 Internazionali di Tennis Città di Verona – Singles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Internazionali di Tennis Città di Verona – Singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:43, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
2023 Salinas Challenger moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Salinas Challenger, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:43, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
2023 Salinas Challenger – Singles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Salinas Challenger – Singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
2023 Salinas Challenger – Doubles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 Salinas Challenger – Doubles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
2023 President's Cup (tennis) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 President's Cup (tennis), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
2023 President's Cup – Men's singles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 President's Cup – Men's singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
2023 President's Cup – Men's doubles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2023 President's Cup – Men's doubles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Obviously unfinished articles in Mainspace
Hi Adamtt9, I have draftified those articles as they were obviously in creation and I couldn't bother to fix each one of them. I saw that you added some info to some, but it's really questionable to have such articles in main space. At times there's no date, (January is too old and December 2023 likely too early). Then all those empty sections... or tables. Why do you want those articles to be in main space and not in draft where you could work on them in peace and without leaving the potential readers wondering what the article is about? Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I have begun a discussion about your unfinished articles and autopatrolled rights at the talk page of the admin which gave you the rights. Your comments will be welcome.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not quite sure what you mean by unfinished. The 2023 President's Cup – Men's doubles article for example is as finished as it can be as that is the stage in the tournament they are in. Would you classify this article as unfinished since there are empty tables there also? Adamtt9 (talk) 13:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Who would know it is as finished as it can be? There is no date, maybe it's in the past or in the future. And just adding the date doesn't help either, if you do not source it. A general reference from a dependent organization... as a secondary reference to fill gaps ok, but with your articles it's often the only source for the tournament. At the end your articles resemble quite much a mirror page. As for the FIFA world championship article, it has dates and is more informative in my opinion.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm unsure of what the problem is though. We have already had a discussion on if these pages are notable as I recall you or someone else sent a page to AFD and it got kept. I have yet to see anyone start an RfC on this topic. And if your proposal is to remove autopatrol, how exactly would that help? The articles all meet notable topics and become "complete", according to your definition, about a week after the tournament starts. They'd all get accepted anyway, making it more work for reviewers. That's why I got autopatrol in the first place. Adamtt9 (talk) 21:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Articles on subjects that have no source independent to the subject as demanded in WP:SIGCOV are not ready for main space in my opinion. If seen getting draftified much better sourced articles. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:25, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- The articles you draftified had a source independent to the subject. You for some reason claim the only source is a PDF of the draw but the 10 or whatever articles you draftified had an independent source. 1, 2, 3, etc., all had independent sources before you draftified them, meeting WP:SIGCOV. Adamtt9 (talk) 13:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Those sources are no SIGCOV for the 2023 tournaments, as they don't mention the tournaments at all. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:14, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- The articles you draftified had a source independent to the subject. You for some reason claim the only source is a PDF of the draw but the 10 or whatever articles you draftified had an independent source. 1, 2, 3, etc., all had independent sources before you draftified them, meeting WP:SIGCOV. Adamtt9 (talk) 13:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Articles on subjects that have no source independent to the subject as demanded in WP:SIGCOV are not ready for main space in my opinion. If seen getting draftified much better sourced articles. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:25, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm unsure of what the problem is though. We have already had a discussion on if these pages are notable as I recall you or someone else sent a page to AFD and it got kept. I have yet to see anyone start an RfC on this topic. And if your proposal is to remove autopatrol, how exactly would that help? The articles all meet notable topics and become "complete", according to your definition, about a week after the tournament starts. They'd all get accepted anyway, making it more work for reviewers. That's why I got autopatrol in the first place. Adamtt9 (talk) 21:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Who would know it is as finished as it can be? There is no date, maybe it's in the past or in the future. And just adding the date doesn't help either, if you do not source it. A general reference from a dependent organization... as a secondary reference to fill gaps ok, but with your articles it's often the only source for the tournament. At the end your articles resemble quite much a mirror page. As for the FIFA world championship article, it has dates and is more informative in my opinion.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not quite sure what you mean by unfinished. The 2023 President's Cup – Men's doubles article for example is as finished as it can be as that is the stage in the tournament they are in. Would you classify this article as unfinished since there are empty tables there also? Adamtt9 (talk) 13:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Patrolling reminder
When patrolling the short sport articles with 1 source and no lead, or anything similar to that, consider draftifying them as they should not be patrolled. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 07:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with this and was going to drop the same note as well. Articles with zero references (or zero references and one external link) should probably be draftified rather than marked as reviewed. Here's a flowchart I made the other day that goes more in depth about draftify than some of the other flowcharts. Hope this helps. –Novem Linguae (talk) 07:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I created an article of John kiramis he is ex Mayor and ex lieutenant he is politician I ad 9 citation with California Digital Newspaper Collection article, Sant Mateo Daily Journal and East Bay Time which makes him eligible and Notable for wikipedia can you please review it and approve for publishing please it will be great help if you review it and accept publishing Thank you Ab.Haris999 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Osamu Abe (rower) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osamu Abe (rower) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Jaguarnik (talk) 18:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Onclin and Collignon
The Belgian pros Onclin and Collignon you just PROD I didn’t move to main space, but it looks as if someone else did, so I’ve moved them back to draft for now. Cheers Hildreth gazzard (talk) 15:48, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Hildreth gazzard: That works too. You might get some more talk page messages about a speedy deletion nomination but I think that is just an automatic setting that comes with the page curation tool so you can just ignore those. Adamtt9 (talk) 16:35, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- Cheers buddy Hildreth gazzard (talk) 17:45, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Cezar Crețu for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cezar Crețu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
FatCat96 (talk) 13:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Marc Roca Barceló for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Roca Barceló until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Black Kite (talk) 17:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol newsletter
Hello Adamtt9,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Jody Maginley for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jody Maginley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:16, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Arthur Bouquier
Hello, Adamtt9. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arthur Bouquier, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:10, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Points award
|
The Reviewer Barnstar | |
| This award is given to Adamtt9 for collecting more than 50 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC) |
Nomination of Pedro Bernardi for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Bernardi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Andrew Lutschaunig
Hello, Adamtt9. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrew Lutschaunig, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Lorenzo Sciahbasi
Hello, Adamtt9. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lorenzo Sciahbasi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Edoardo Lavagno
Hello, Adamtt9. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Edoardo Lavagno, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Michael Zheng
Hello, Adamtt9. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael Zheng, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Arthur Bouquier
Hello, Adamtt9. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arthur Bouquier".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Undid revisions
Hi Adamtt9, I have noticed you undid my contributions here and here.
I was trying to use the same criteria to Latin names in Spanish and Portuguese. Could You please elaborate ? --MarcRic::Ruby (talk) 10:11, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Marcric: The player's entire last name, or family name, should be spelled out with only their first name or given name shorthanded. For example, the player Leyre Romero Gormaz has a given name of Leyre while the rest is her family name, so it should be spelled out in its entirety. Adamtt9 (talk) 12:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ok Adamtt9, I have noticed You are from U.S. So, let me explain how Latin names works in practice: We, most of the time, receive four names: the first two by choice "Marco Antônio" or "Carlos Alberto" for instance. The next two came from mother and father family names in no specific order "Oliveira Souza" or "Pereira de Almeida" for instance. People with two names like "Emerson Fittipaldi" or three names like "Edson Arantes do Nascimento" are not so common. But my point there was just to use the same shortened pattern in Latin names. If You short "Leyre Romero Gormaz" as ""LR Gormaz" and "María Lourdes Carlé" as "ML Carlé", "Carolina Bohrer Martins" should be "CB Martins" and "Carolina Meligeni Alves" should be "CM Alves". I was just trying to apply the same pattern to our Latin "long" names in the shortened form. If You go this way, You will need to fix all other shortened names that were there before my "contribution". Regards. --MarcRic::Ruby (talk) 12:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- You would be incorrect and should check to make sure that these players have received one or two names when they signed up with the ITF. The only player in your list there with two received first names is ML Carle. Everyone else you just listed has two family names and only one given name, at least provided to the ITF. Adamtt9 (talk) 13:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Andrew Lutschaunig
Hello, Adamtt9. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andrew Lutschaunig".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Edoardo Lavagno
Hello, Adamtt9. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edoardo Lavagno".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Sarah Behbehani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
She exists but does not appear to meet WP:NTENNIS or WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Kyle Seelig
Hello, Adamtt9. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kyle Seelig, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Adamtt9!
Adamtt9,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Timothytyy (talk) 00:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Timothytyy (talk) 00:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
NPP Awards for 2023
|
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
| For over 100 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC) |
Hello, Adamtt9,
Please review WP:DRAFTIFY thoroughly. Of particular interest is the guidance that A page may only be moved unilaterally to the draftspace a single time.
An editor can object to draftifying and move the article back to main space without it being returned to Draft space. This article was moved to Draft space three times! Please check the page history before draftifying an article to make sure that it hasn't already been draftied before. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Liz: Yeah if I remember correctly I PROD the article before that second draftification but another editor removed the PROD and just moved the article back to draft space. But I'll remember that for next time. Adamtt9 (talk) 02:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)