User talk:Marcric
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gunnerdevil4 18:36, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 | My First amendment This is my talk page. From now on, every item added here and signed by an IP address will just be deleted ASAP. I don't talk to IPs.User:Marcric 11:31, 2024-02-11 (UTC) |
Examples
[edit]Re Ruby by examples:
- you will fare far further if you put this stuff in Wikibooks at b:en:Ruby examples
- we deplore empty / stub articles
- we do not put in empty self-referential phrases such as "Lets stablish some sub-titles to start" (and we learn to spell!)
- we do not use external links ([1]) to Wikipedia articles.
-- RHaworth 19:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
A page you started has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Sharp Edge Flight Experiment, Marcric!
Wikipedia editor Jrcrin001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This article seems a translation or similar to the German Wiki SHEFEX I and SHEFEX II articles. I find the concept interesting.
To reply, leave a comment on Jrcrin001's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Ways to improve Sharp Edge Flight Experiment
[edit]Hi, I'm Jrcrin001. Marcric, thanks for creating Sharp Edge Flight Experiment!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. See the German Wiki articles for catagories and more citations. SHEFEX I and SHEFEX II articles. I find the concept interesting.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Leia por favor
[edit]This posts was "vanished" by me. The history have the motivation by it self. --MarcRic::Ruby (talk) 11:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Prolixismo
[edit]Entendo suas boas intenções, mas você precisa aprender a ser um pouco mais conciso na hora de escrever. Seu prolixismo é bem evidente. Tente pesar melhor o que você escreve: para qualquer tenista, é desnecessário falar sobre derrotas em primeiras rodadas, até mesmo em segundas rodadas, a não ser que seja um tenista fraco que conseguiu uma vez ou outra entrar em um torneio forte, aí vale a pena falar sobre isso, senão não. Tente também não exaltar coisas desnecessárias que só enchem linguiça no texto. No caso da Beatriz Haddad Maia, entenda que ela é uma tenista top, então, o que vale a pena descrever é campanhas em torneios grandes onde ela chega em quartas-de-final pra frente. Se ela perde na 1a ou 2a rodada não traz nenhum ganho significativo na descrição da biografia dela, que vai ficar excessivamente grande e cansativa de se ler. Também não precisa escrever 10 linhas sobre cada torneio que ela participa a não ser que tenha acontecido coisas fora do comum que mereçam ser descritas. E também não é bom fazer um parágrafo gigante com 3 ou 4 torneios tudo grudado, o ideal é um parágrafo pra cada torneio importante, eu no máximo juntaria uns 2 ou 3 torneios pequenos se fosse algo específico tipo a temporada de grama antes de Wimbledon. 2804:14D:5C87:8E8C:E549:2A6D:2C1C:EFB2 (talk) 14:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Anotado. Estou me ambientando e experimentando por aqui. Por enquanto, é o que tenho pra contribuir. Se as circunstâncias fossem outras faria exatamente isso, só que, como mencionei, preciso experimentar por aqui, e não é sobre o tanto que escrevo, e sim sobre como escrevo e como referencio o texto. Quanto aos parágrafos, eu entendo que cada "giro" deva ter o seu: o australiano, o europeu, o americano... E ainda entremeados com os giros por tipo de piso: duro, saibro e grama. Esse é o procedimento que eu adoto. Lembrando que: estou muito longe de ser o dono da verdade, e as edições são livres... 🖖 --MarcRic::Ruby (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- É bom a gente pensar no "todo" do artigo. Os tenistas tem carreiras de 15, 20 anos jogando. Se colocarmos tudo que aconteceu, cada derrota em 1a rodada etc, fica gigantesco e não dá uma sequência boa na leitura. Em outtrs tipos de atletas de outros eeportes que participam de poucos torneios por ano vale a pena detalhar mais, mas tenistas jogam 25, 30 torneios por ano por 15, 20 anos. Daí, por bom senso, é melhor focar no que aconteceu de mais importante. Quanto àos parágrafos, se a gente mistura muitos torneios num só (principalmente de níveis diferentes) o leitor tende a pular e perder alguma informação. Dá pra juntar em casos como a Gira sul anericana de saibro ou os de grama antes de Wimbledon, que sao 250 normalmente.2804:214:8292:4253:6E:6E89:2CE:7BAD (talk) 17:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Bom, eu, como pessoa claramente identificada, não gosto de "conversar" com IPs e vou encerrar aqui. Como já mencionei, está anotado. Tudo que você disse eu mesmo disse sobre um artigo de jogadora brasileira sem expressão esportiva no qual na Wikipedia "lusófona", colocaram um parágrafo para cada rodada de um torneio (também sem muita expressão), com placar e tudo. Em princípio, concordo, só que nesse momento, preciso ser um pouco prolixo por aqui. 🖖 --MarcRic::Ruby (talk) 17:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- É bom a gente pensar no "todo" do artigo. Os tenistas tem carreiras de 15, 20 anos jogando. Se colocarmos tudo que aconteceu, cada derrota em 1a rodada etc, fica gigantesco e não dá uma sequência boa na leitura. Em outtrs tipos de atletas de outros eeportes que participam de poucos torneios por ano vale a pena detalhar mais, mas tenistas jogam 25, 30 torneios por ano por 15, 20 anos. Daí, por bom senso, é melhor focar no que aconteceu de mais importante. Quanto àos parágrafos, se a gente mistura muitos torneios num só (principalmente de níveis diferentes) o leitor tende a pular e perder alguma informação. Dá pra juntar em casos como a Gira sul anericana de saibro ou os de grama antes de Wimbledon, que sao 250 normalmente.2804:214:8292:4253:6E:6E89:2CE:7BAD (talk) 17:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ons Jabeur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2023 US Open. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I have fixed that. Thanks Wikipedia bots. 🖖 --MarcRic::Ruby (talk) 09:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 23
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anna Kalinskaya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2023 US Open.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I have fixed that. Thanks Wikipedia bots. 🖖 --MarcRic::Ruby (talk) 10:07, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 8
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dow Tennis Classic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITF.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I have fixed that. --MarcRic::Ruby (talk) 21:13, 8 November 2024 (UTC)