User talk:ROTennisFan
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]
Welcome ROTennisFan!I'm Scope creep, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
- Thanks for the welcome message! ROTennisFan (talk) 21:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Feedback on / reviewing Draft:Maria Sara Popa
[edit]{{Help me}}
Hi. It says "If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject."
It's been 52 days since I created Draft:Maria Sara Popa and I would like to contribute more to Wikipedia, but I don't have any feedback if I'm on the right track or not. She doesn't quite yet meet the Wikipedia:NTENNIS requirements, which can be a little strict, but she could meet the Wikipedia:NBASIC ones. I didn't write too much about her personal life and other activities, because only big tennis players have that, as far as I saw.
She received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject., whilst having very good results in her area of expertise, for her age.
Could you please help me out or even review it? Thank you in advance.
ROTennisFan (talk) 01:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- The {{help}} templates are intended for use on your own user talk page (you got that part right this time) and for getting help with "how to edit" questions. Asking for help with content is very nearly what every message on Wikipedia is about, so you can't use the templates to do that. Asking for something akin to a review is allowed on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject, but there are a lot of drafts on the review pile.
- If you feel like you've done all you can on a draft and are still waiting for a review, one thing you can do while waiting is make improvements to other existing articles (or drafts). These edits will generally be small improvements, but there are so many existing articles in need of improvement, you'll be helping the project at the same time as you learn more about editing. Don't know where to start? Try WP:Community Portal.
- If you have suitable sources that could fill in details about Popa's personal life or other activities, you could add them. Article content is based on what sources are available more than any sense of being a "big tennis player".
- Asking the same question at multiple WikiProjects simultaneously is perhaps going to get you some criticism for spamming. We all understand that you are impatient to get a review. The review system is so bogged down right now, that it is becoming a problem. Maybe they'll hold a review-a-thon soon to try to work off the backlog. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 03:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Maria Sara Popa has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ravenswing 07:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)