User talk:Adamstom.97/Archive 7

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Adamstom.97. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Infinity War/Endgame production work

Hey Adam! Hope all is well! I saw you're starting some work on the production article in your sandbox. Let me know when you're finished with what you want to do. I'd be happy to then go through and make a pass/copy-edit to it before its copied back over to the live article. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Will do. My plan at the moment is to get through everything I want to do by the end of the weekend, but if that doesn't happen then I may not be in a rush. So far I've been adding quite a bit of good stuff. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:40, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Sounds good, and yeah, no rush on my end either to look it over! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:58, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Patrolling of articles

Hello! Colleague, could you please to patrol this and this articles? Thank you. — Green Zero обг 01:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Morbius (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walt Disney Studios (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Star Trek Discovery title card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star Trek Discovery title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

star trek

I understand your comment but i think it is very relevant for a parent to know a star trek series is rated TV-MA. If you look up the movie Showgirls, you will see that its NC-17 rating is mentioned numerous times. When something is unusual I think it is reasonable for Wiki to include it because it is important information. If you wish to also state this in the main section that is fine with me. I think if you open this up for conversation, many people would see my POV. However, I will leave it as is. You change it (or include somewhere else) if you agree with me. Thanks Drycroft4 (talk) 22:29, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

You are right that it is reasonable to include if it is unusual, but it is not up to us to decide what is unusual and what is not. We need commentary from reliable third party sources discussing the rating and why it is unusual if we want to include that information in the article. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Once Upon a Deadpool

Hello, Adamstom.97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Once Upon a Deadpool".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

About DiscussingFilm

Hi, Tom. Given your edit in Draft:Untitled Spider-Man: Far From Home sequel, do you consider DiscussingFilm a reliable source? If so, why? I'm having a hard time defining if relatively new websites like this are reliable or not. I've also asked this at WT:FILM and WP:RSN. El Millo (talk) 01:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

It is relatively new, but it has editorial oversight and has proven reliable for scoops particularly related to filming and cinematographers. I definitely think its reliable, but like any of these sites we just have to keep an eye out to make sure what they are saying seems right. If they started reporting on a bunch of stuff that is obviously made up like what some other sites do (We Got This Covered, for example) then maybe we would have to reconsider. But yeah, at the moment I have been considering it to be reliable. - adamstom97 (talk) 01:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. El Millo (talk) 01:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

THANK YOU!

Using Indented plainlist and quad at at the CM draft has literally solved an issue I've been having with the Based on template and had brought up on its talk page. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Oh, interesting, thanks for pointing out that discussion. I've been thinking about doing something about it for a while as I find it hard to look at with the multiple listings all blurring together.

P.S. happy to discuss the coronavirus in the lead thing. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:04, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Yeah I wanted to see if there was some sort of code to handle it on the Based on template side, but based on our conversations, I don't think so. So this is a good fix in my eyes until a solution potentially is found. I'm going to start a coronavirus lead discussion on the Phase 4 talk. Seems most appropriate. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

~~Actually, regular Plainlist, and then {{Nb5}} might do more of what I wanted or at least is an alternative. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)~~ Scratch that. It's a method, but not the one I had proposed on the based on talk page. Yours was it! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:50, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

New page creation

I went and created a character list from scratch for the manga Edens Zero, but since I don't typically create entirely new pages, I'm not certain if there were any necessary procedures to go through first, such as submitting a draft for approval, or if it needs a review. What do I do? User:SubZeroSilver (talk) 02:29, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

There is no real procedure, it just depends on the situation. Every new article will be patrolled by an experienced editor and if they see any major problems then they may choose to let you know or help out. I just took a look at your page and it looks really good, especially the "real world" aspects which is what we always want to focus on with entertainment-related articles. Drafts are used when you want to start making an article but it is not ready to be in the mainspace, or is not allowed to be yet (for instance, articles about films aren't usually allowed in the mainspace until filming begins so sometimes a draft will be created with all the details known before filming). In future, if you make another great article like this one and are confident with it then you should feel free to go ahead and make it. If you want to start working on something and let others help out then you can always make a draft, and if you have a draft but aren't sure if it should be moved to the mainspace then there is the option to submit the draft for approval. But mostly I think you should just carry on as you are. You can also use your sandbox if you want to play around with something but don't want other people working on it yet which can happen in the draftspace. - adamstom97 (talk) 02:37, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Star Trek Picard season 2 poster.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Star Trek Picard season 2 poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:00, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

A copy edit pass?

Hey Adam. If you had the time/interest, would you be willing to give Crisis on Infinite Earths (Arrowverse) a copy-edit? I'm hoping to nominate it soon for GA, and have requested a copy editor from the Guild to take a look, but I'd love to have your thoughts on it as well. Thanks. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

I'll try take a look at it today. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! No rush. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:20, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

I've given it a c/e pass, and I think it does a good job balancing all the information from all the shows in the one article. I understand why the last reception subsection combines two episodes, but I think it wouldn't be too hard to separate them and it would make sense to do that if there was enough reception info out there on the Legends episode. I also think you could add some discussion to the ratings section (I seem to remember reading that they had all gone up for the crossover), and then summarize that reception info in the lead. Otherwise I think it is looking pretty good. - adamstom97 (talk) 01:44, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks so much Adam! Yeah, since Arrow and Legends aired on the same night, most of the reviews were about both as a whole, so it seem easier to just combine the two into one section. Only the AV Club had individual reviews for each episode. I'll definitely look into the ratings info and see what I can add, and then to create an overall reception summary in the lead. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:19, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Also, do you have any thoughts on how to present the cast that was uncredited? Currently I'm using the dagger, and formerly had efns for all of them, but I'm not totally sold on either of those methods being the best. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

I don't know if I have a better option other than maybe having two sections, one for credited guests and one for uncredited cameos. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:57, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Yeah I think anyway you want to portray the info, there's going to be duplication/excess somewhere. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:25, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks once again for reviewing Home Alone and giving it GA status! Thanks, Thatone~~weird~~wikier Say hi 05:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Defenders (miniseries)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Defenders (miniseries) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheJoebro64 -- TheJoebro64 (talk) 11:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

New marvel movie part of the sony's marvel universe

Can you help me to edit a page title Draft:Madame Web (film) please. Blackknight1234567890 (talk) 09:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

What specifically did you need help with? Also, I feel like it might be a little early for that article considering we only have one source for it so far. - adamstom97 (talk) 15:46, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Advice

Hi. Thanks for the Home Alone review. I was wondering if you think that Bad Blood, an article that I destubified, is in good enough shape for GA. It being a Canadian show, it has limited critical reception attention, but other than that I think its overall coverage is in good condition. Thanks for the advice in advance. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 02:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Hey, it looks like you have done a good job so far. Since there are individual season articles I think you should be able to present the series article as an overview of the articles which means you don't need quite as much info, but it would definitely be good to get a few more sections going if possible like maybe some marketing info or music? I'm not quite sure what is available for this show in particular, but you've got it on the right track. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:15, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice, unfortunately, I've searched for things like that, but was unable to find anything related. Coincidentally (...or not), a user has just added the split info back into the main page, which seems to be rightfully so given the tvsplit guide for not being of substantial size to warrant a split. In doing so, the page is probably more comprehensive and a "Broadcast and releases" section was merged into the main article. I have also just finished trimming the episodes down between 200-300 words because he had tagged them for clean up given they were admittedly much too large (400-500 words). I know the guide says it is recommended that they be 200 words, but given I have done the best I could to get it as close to that number as possible, would being marginally over the word limit influence your decision as a GA reviewer? I think there is a point where the guide can be ignored if we are trying to keep the summary respectable while at the same time avoiding glaring plot gaps. Since you are someone who often reviews TV and film articles, I'm wondering perspective on this. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 03:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

200 words is a pretty good guideline, there is very rarely need for it to be longer than that. However, it is just a guideline and if a reviewer expresses concern about the length but you are able to convince them that it is necessary for the specific series then it could be fine. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Fair enough. If you get a chance, would you be able to do a copy edit, and maybe you could bring up some parts you think could be shortened in that section? Thanks, Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 03:39, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

I think you have to do some more research to find sources for the article, such as more reviews of the show that could be added to the critical response section. Good luck with that. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:54, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Adamstom.97

Thank you for creating List of Star Trek: Picard characters.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

@North8000: Thanks for the comment, I created the list because I was expanding Star Trek: Picard and knew that there are often editors out there who like to work on character lists like that and should be able to help work on it in the future. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Morbius (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black Panther (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Black Panther (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- Rusted AutoParts (talk) 13:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Sony's Marvel Universe

Hello, User:Adamstom.97! I have began a series of discussion on the Talk:Sony's Marvel Universe page. There are several things that I feel the article could benefit from, and to avoid edit warring, I am taking them there. Cheers m8!--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 00:40, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lord of the Rings (TV series) has been accepted

The Lord of the Rings (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Related to vs based on

Hi, I've started a discussion on the article above. You have now been reverted by two editors so it would be wise to abide by that sign of consensus. I've started a discussion on the article's talk page, and you should not attempt to revert anything in the article (per edit-warring) until consensus is obtained for that action in discussion on the talk page. Many thanks for your understanding, Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:31, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

The series being based on LOTR has been the WP:STATUSQUO of that article from long before I was ever involved, so no I'm afraid it is your WP:BOLD change for which consensus will need to be obtained. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:38, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

No, there is consensus against your opinion. However I came back here to remind you that personal attacks and abuse are strictly forbidden here on Wikipedia per WP:NPA. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Okay, well I'm not sure why you needed to say that. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black Panther (film)

The article Black Panther (film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Black Panther (film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- Rusted AutoParts (talk) 14:41, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Apologies, I fucked up. I actually passed the page but didn’t apply the talk page header stuff properly. Rusted AutoParts 15:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Charlie Cox as Daredevil in Marvel's Daredevil.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charlie Cox as Daredevil in Marvel's Daredevil.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:12, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Charlie Cox as Daredevil in Marvel's Daredevil.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charlie Cox as Daredevil in Marvel's Daredevil.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Star Trek Picard season 2 poster.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Star Trek Picard season 2 poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. season 4 title card.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. season 4 title card.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Francesco Francavilla Ghost Rider poster.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Francesco Francavilla Ghost Rider poster.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. LMD title card.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. LMD title card.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:22, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. "Self Control" poster.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. "Self Control" poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

File:4,722 Hours title screen.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:4,722 Hours title screen.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:32, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Secret Warriors poster.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Secret Warriors poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Jemma Simmons in Making Friends and Influencing People.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jemma Simmons in Making Friends and Influencing People.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:35, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Raina in "...Ye Who Enter Here".jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Raina in "...Ye Who Enter Here".jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Tim DeKay as Christian Ward in "A Fractured House".png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tim DeKay as Christian Ward in "A Fractured House".png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. season 3 title card.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. season 3 title card.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:50, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Raina in "...Ye Who Enter Here".jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Raina in "...Ye Who Enter Here".jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

Good work on starting the sandbox and then in moving it to draftspace. While the general guideline in the TV show and film wikiprojects is to wait until filming starts to have the article in mainspace, WP:GNG overrides project guidelines. This project is going to bring a lot of interested readers to Wikipedia searching for information on the show, so having an article will help to address those needs. As long as the article clearly meets GNG, I think any AFD challenges to a pre-filming article can be overcome. That means having high-quality mainstream sources, not just genre sites. It may take a few months to get there, but I believe the sources will come. Again, good work. - BilCat (talk) 04:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Secret Warriors poster.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Secret Warriors poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

An Unknown Abbreviation

@Adamstom.97: you used the abbreviation "c/e". I've never seen that before. I'd like to know what it's abbreviating. Please, If you've got a moment, lemme know. Liberty5651 (talk) 18:12, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

@Liberty5651: Hi, c/e means copy-edit. It's an abbreviation that I've been using for many years now whenever I've been re-writing or adjusting phrasing. It's mostly out of habit at this point. - adamstom97 (talk) 20:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Defenders (miniseries)

The article The Defenders (miniseries) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Defenders (miniseries) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheJoebro64 -- TheJoebro64 (talk) 19:21, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Huh? It should say pass. I have no idea how that happened. JOE BRO 64 20:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

I've seen it happen before. May be to do with the length of the review. Might need to manually add the GA icon to the article if it doesn't show up. - adamstom97 (talk) 20:09, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Discovery (season 2)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Star Trek: Discovery (season 2) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 16:31, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

AoS chat

Hey, just wanted to let you know about this chat with the cast and producers. I've just started watching through it to see if there's anything to add anywhere, and wanted you to know about it too (in case you didn't) if you wanted to watch it as well. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Hey, thanks. I did see it but hadn't taken the time to watch it yet. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:29, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Yeah no worries! I'm only about 5 mins in to it myself. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Discovery (season 2)

The article Star Trek: Discovery (season 2) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Star Trek: Discovery (season 2) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 19:01, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

PR

Hey Adam! I don't want to distract you from any of your current projects, but if you've got time, would you mind commenting at my peer review for Sonic the Hedgehog? I'm trying to get it to FA status to run it on the main page on June 23, 2021 (the 30th anniversary) and want some outside eyes before I nominate it. JOE BRO 64 22:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

I'll try take a look when I have time. - adamstom97 (talk) 01:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

@TheJoebro64: Hey, I haven't found anything that I take issue with in the article, but I'm also not super confident with the FA requirements so I'll leave it to other editors / the FA process to be more nitpicky than me. Good luck. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:27, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks so much for taking a look! JOE BRO 64 22:37, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thank you for completing 10 reviews in the April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 60%. Regards, Harrias ^talk 07:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Picard (season 1)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Star Trek: Picard (season 1) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Heartfox -- Heartfox (talk) 04:01, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Picard (season 1)

The article Star Trek: Picard (season 1) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Star Trek: Picard (season 1) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Heartfox -- Heartfox (talk) 18:21, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Adamstom.97

Thank you for creating Star Trek: Prodigy.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:33, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

October 2020 GAN Backlog drive!

-- Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Removing Genre in The Mandalorian

Hello, I'm not quite sure why you keep removing the genre from the first line of The Mandalorian, and the explanation you give is that it is unnecessary. However, the genre is absolutely necessary to provide a two-word context to the reader the defining feature as to what type of show it is - fantasy, science fiction, horror, space opera, etc. This is also consistent with MOS:TVGENRE, and the fact that the show is a Space Western is verified through not only Pascal's comments but is also repeated in the table, and for good luck, in case it may be unsourced here are three sources: [1] [2] [3]. Also, I don't want to pull that other stuff exists, but it is nevertheless worth noting that this format is consistent with existing tv show articles, such as Stranger Things, Game of Thrones, and Breaking Bad. Thus, I believe we should reconsider adding the genre for a bit more clarity for our readers. Hummerrocket (talk) 03:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Peggy Carter and Edwin Jarvis in "Now is Not the End".jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peggy Carter and Edwin Jarvis in "Now is Not the End".jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:26, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello

Greetings! More than a year has passed since the premiere of Avengers: Endgame and the question arises, will the article about Production of Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers: Endgame be finalized and put forward for GA? AaronSprouse (talk) 05:45, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Everyone who edits on Wikipedia is volunteering their time, and can choose to direct those efforts however they wish. When I do have the time to come here, what I do will depend very much upon what I am in the mood to work on at the time. There is no set plan or anything like that. So you are free to put more work into that article if you so wish. - adamstom97 (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

This is normal when there is a lot of work. For example, I personally admire your work, namely The Mandalorian, Star Trek and MCU movies/TV series. Just on your behalf, articles about MCU look most clearly. I even saw your sandbox about production, even the movie Logan. But I'm not referring to the fact that you need to do something right away, but only to find out the answer. And then it's a matter of time. AaronSprouse (talk) 10:54, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	You do good work. Starzoner (talk) 19:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

The Mandalorian

I had confused the Written by column with the Directed by column. El Millo (talk) 23:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Ah, makes sense. All good. - adamstom97 (talk) 01:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

The Mandalorian is the main reason of Disney+ Success

You removed my addition and new section called "Disney+ Impact" Here is another source that supports it: Martinvince (talk) 23:57, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

That source is better, as we could use Most gave the Jon Favreau-created series, The Mandalorian, credit for the platform’s strong start. But we still shouldn't be putting it in the productions section. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

One more source here that says people are sticking around because of Mandalorian.Martinvince (talk) 00:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC) Where do you think is the best spot for it? Maybe a new Header after Reception or under Reception? Martinvince (talk) 00:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

It can probably go under "Audience viewership" in the reception section, like we have at the season 1 article. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

I think due to its huge impact, we need to call it "Impact on Disney+." Check the The Mandalorian Talk page, I proposed it there. You can leave a comment about your idea of how to do it. Martinvince (talk) 08:57, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Adamstom.97, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,
TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)