User talk:209.122.10.206

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

{{unblock-Because i understand that i made unnecessary rewrites to pages that didn't needed info, i promise to not write unnecessary things and only add info to pieces that might need a bit of cleaning up. I have aspergers syndrome so i'm new to this wikipedia thing and i may be a bit rusty, so i apologize in advance. I'll stick to community policies and respect administrators, and i'll stop doing whatever got me banned before and only contribute things that need to be contributed like in the heads of state who were later imprisoned page, so thanks for being very nice people.}}

May 2017

Hello, I'm A Great Catholic Person. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Major League Baseball mascots, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. A Great Catholic Person (talk) 21:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2018

Hello, I'm Qzd. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Kate Brown, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qzd (talk) 20:02, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Spitting Image— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:10, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Modesto Nuts

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Modesto Nuts, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Leviv ich 03:28, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm Mélencron. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Endorsements in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mélencron (talk) 03:47, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Amaluna, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sincerely, Masum Reza^☎ 00:34, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Inland Empire 66ers. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

209.122.10.206 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

because i was just trying to add more info on stuff, i won't do it again, sorry...

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Joko Widodo

Jusuf Kalla tetap wapres - pelantikan akan dilaksanakan pada tanggal 20 Oktober: baca https://jambi.tribunnews.com/2019/06/28/jadwal-pelantikan-presiden-wapres-jokowi-maruf-amin-usai-gugatan-prabowo-ditolak-mk?page=4 Regards Davidelit (Talk) 04:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, I'm Dan arndt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pujith Jayasundara have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Jayasundara is still the IGP he has yet to be formally dismissed from the position Dan arndt (talk) 04:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Eric Kimmel

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Eric Kimmel, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! M.Bitton (talk) 00:05, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

well, actually there are other writers in the Jewish artists thing like Daniel Handler, so could you at least let it slide since writing is technically an art form in itself.

August 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. S0091 (talk) 16:55, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Is Neal Adams Jewish?

Please see Is Neal Adams Jewish? on the Neal Adams Talk page. Thanks! - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I am a man. The traditional male pronouns are fine.) 18:37, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aslambek Vadalov. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Andrew Base (talk) 03:12, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Daron Nefcy

Could someone make a wikipedia page for her, since she's an interesting person who i think deserves one. 2:50, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Actually, you can create the article. You do not need to have an account but it is recommended. See Your First Article for guidance. S0091 (talk) 15:16, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Your addition to O (Cirque du Soleil) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Dorsetonian (talk) 06:58, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019

Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Corteo—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. LakesideMiners^{Come Talk To Me!} 23:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What Are You Talking About?, it's just like the other Cirque pages like Mystere or Zumanity, there's no need to add that big copyright thing, it just seems unnecessary. 23:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm EmphasisMine. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Endorsements in the 2019 United Kingdom general election, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. EmphasisMine (talk) 10:03, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to 2019 Lebanese protests. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (209.122.10.206) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! 911ChickenCop (talk) 02:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 05:33, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

What are you Talking about? i was just trying to report some people for vandalising a wikipedia page, i don't even know where i'm supposed to report, it's so confusing!!!

Criteria for political endorsements

Hi 209.122.10.206. Please be aware that any political endorsements must meet all three of these criteria:

The endorser must have an article or be unquestionably entitled to one
This endorsement must be covered by reliable and independent sources
Coverage of the endorsement needs to use the word endorse, or other closely related synonym.

This is covered by the consensus at WP:ERFC.

For that reason, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, poker websites, and blogs are not acceptable sources. Also, donating to a campaign or showing up to a campaign rally are not endorsements. Please let me know if you have any questions. - Mr X 🖋 23:48, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential campaign endorsements ‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Mr X 🖋 20:30, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Elizabeth Warren 2020 presidential campaign endorsements, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not use Twitter as a reference for endorsements. See WP:ERFC. - Mr X 🖋 00:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Joss Whedon said he clearly endorsed Warren...

Political endorsements

Following a recent discussion, please note that political endorsements included in Wikipedia must meet the following criteria:

The endorser must have an article or be unquestionably entitled to one
This endorsement must be covered by reliable and independent sources
Coverage of the endorsement needs to use the word endorse, or other closely related synonym.

Billy West's tweet mentioning "#Bernie2020" does not meet the last two criteria. Please make sure that any future endorsements you include meet all three of the above criteria. Otherwise, they will be removed. If you have any questions, you can ask me at my talk page or ask another volunteer at the Teahouse. Thanks! — Bilorv (talk) 23:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He clearly said he endorses Bernie on his twitter — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.122.10.206 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Tweet is not independent from the person who tweeted it. We need secondary coverage which uses the word "endorsement" or a synonym to include it. Otherwise, the content will be removed. I am not the first person to point this out to you. You can sign your talk page comments with ~~~~ and thank you for removing your insult against me. — Bilorv (talk) 00:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on List of Elizabeth Warren 2020 presidential campaign endorsements. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Mr X 🖋 17:06, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aslan Byutukayev. CLCStudent (talk) 01:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I apologize 209.122.10.206 (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Elizabeth Warren 2020 presidential campaign endorsements. - Mr X 🖋 14:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Personal attacks

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But it's true!!!-209.122.10.206 (talk) 23:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you think i need to be banned for speaking the truth... then ban me-209.122.10.206 (talk) 00:29, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continued personal attacks and harassment. I warning you that continued personal attacks and harassment, which includes opposition research such as posting off-site material regarding an editor, would lead to a block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

docquery.fec.gov

docquery.fec.gov cannot be used for political endorsements per WPERFC. You continue to make these types of edits against consensus. From now on, I will be rolling back such edits per WP:WP:ROLLBACKUSE #5. - Mr X 🖋 13:29, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential campaign endorsements, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr Xaero ^☎️ 19:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

American politics discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential campaign endorsements has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential campaign endorsements was changed by 209.122.10.206 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2020-03-10T22:20:25+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

209.122.10.206 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm again sorry for "Vandalizing" articles on Wikipedia, i promise to only edit when it's only needed, so i'd like to appeal this block by only doing edits on your own terms, i'll listen to you, i promise

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 20:50, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Recent edit to Otto Soglow

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Otto Soglow, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! M.Bitton (talk) 22:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential campaign endorsements, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please refer to WP:ERFC -- which disallows Twitter/Facebook and other primary sources to verify endorsements -- prior to adding the personalities back. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 06:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page 2020 United States Senate election in Kentucky has been reverted.
Your edit here to 2020 United States Senate election in Kentucky was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/ava/status/1274397444747309057, https://twitter.com/Oweeeeendennis/status/1274597765448753152) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:26, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

July 2020

I wanted to let you know that political endorsements must meet all three of these criteria:

The endorser must have an article or be unquestionably entitled to one
This endorsement must be covered by reliable and independent sources
Coverage of the endorsement needs to use the word endorse, or other closely related synonym.

This is covered by the consensus at WP:ERFC.

For that reason, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, poker websites, and blogs are not acceptable sources. Also, donating to a campaign or showing up to a campaign rally are not endorsements. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you - MrX 🖋 21:59, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Andrew Yang 2020 presidential campaign endorsements, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential campaign endorsements, you may be blocked from editing. Please read WP:ERFC prior to adding another endorsement to said list or related lists. This isn't the first time you've been notified about this issue. Among the criteria for adding an endorsement, is (#2) that the endorsement is covered in independent reliable sources -- Twitter is not an independent reliable source. Thank you, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 06:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For god's sake man... they all have said that they clearly supported Bernie, besides... you didn't remove the Twitter endorsements for Hillary Clinton from 2016, so why remove my edits if you all did the same goddamn thing back then. Not to mention i've seen how you've been censoring numerous people on Breitbart and KotakuinAction.^[1]^[2]209.122.10.206 (talk) 06:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus was established in December 2019. All related articles to the 2020 elections have Twitter endorsements regularly removed; you've received numerous warnings since December 2019, even have been blocked because of this in March, a warning by me in May, and a further warning by another editor just last week. Yet still, you are not getting the point. I have removed Twitter endorsements on most if not all major candidates from all parties for the 2020 elections. Breitbart is not a reliable source per WP:BREITBART, and Reddit will never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, be an acceptable reliable source on Wikipedia. Ever.

In response to the links you've linked: nobody is forcing you to edit Wikipedia. If you believe Wikipedia is biased and unreliable, you're more than welcome to find a website that is better and edit that. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 07:01, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign endorsements. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 09:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

August 2020

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 03:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for the persistent addition of poorly-sourced content, still (specifically WP:TWITTER violations). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 03:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rube Goldberg. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop adding redundant categories. He's in Category:Jewish American artists so there is no need to add him to Category:Jewish artists Meters (talk) 05:17, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Daily Mail reference at List of ISIL members

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at List of ISIL members. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:15, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2021

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Micah Wright have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Micah Wright was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/MicahTheWarDog/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

August 2021

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tom Kane, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 04:14, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter endorsements

Please read WP:ENDORSE before making any more edits; your recent additions failed to be sourced properly and were deleted. 2600:1012:B02C:BB0C:F47D:E856:9F26:EA3D (talk) 21:54, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Elizabeth Warren 2020 presidential campaign endorsements, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Isabelle ^🔔 23:10, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted many of your unsourced additions to articles. Please read WP:V. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 04:32, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. You have to stop using vague tweets as sources. BriefEdits (talk) 02:36, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Zack de la Rocha, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Nathan Larson (politician). Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at David Trone, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 19:15, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at P.G. Sittenfeld. General Ization ^Talk 19:35, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You're now approaching a one-year block, or more, rather than the last six-month block you received for refusing to cite sources for your edits. General Ization ^Talk 19:37, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 19:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Important question

What reliably-sourced article content supported the inclusion of the following category to this articleand this article.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:54, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...and this one

...and this blatant violation of WP:BLPCAT.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the articles noted above, I've reverted all of your recent category edits where you added categories stating that BLP subjects had been convicted of crimes where there was no reliably sourced content (or any content) verifying a conviction for any crime. Do you not know the difference between an arrest or indictment and an actual conviction? Your editing history continues to demonstrate that you should not allowed to edit BLPs at all.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:09, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.

[1] ttp://archive.li/sEA25

[2] ttps://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/

[1]

[2]