User talk:11S117

This is 11S117's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: September 2018 Jalalabad suicide bombing has been accepted

September 2018 Jalalabad suicide bombing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:56, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Current events

Do not mention weekdays and keep to present tenses if the event happened on the day the entry is being added to. For example:

Sunday events

Two people died in a car crash on Sunday. N
Two people are killed in a car crash. Y

CentreLeftRight ✉ 06:04, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathaniel Petgrave

Hello 11S117,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nathaniel Petgrave for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CentreLeftRight ✉ 18:36, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Joseph Metheny.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Joseph Metheny.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:28, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cristhian Rivera.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cristhian Rivera.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. GMG ^talk 20:32, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deaths of Tala and Rotana Farea for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deaths of Tala and Rotana Farea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deaths of Tala and Rotana Farea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 19:25, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Brendt Christensen.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brendt Christensen.jpg, which you've attributed to Photo by: The News-Gazette/AP. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:20, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Murder of Missy Bevers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Murder of Missy Bevers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thousand Oaks shooting. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ―Mandruss ☎ 00:12, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elizabeth Lecron

The article Elizabeth Lecron has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NCRIME. While there is some coverage in notable sources, the person is not WP:N outside of the crime, and I don't see the point in giving someone there own wp for doing something like this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Comatmebro (talk) 07:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elizabeth Lecron for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth Lecron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Lecron until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CoolSkittle (talk) 07:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! CoolSkittle (talk) 07:30, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Applewhite image

I felt bad reverting you as I could see you were struggling to get the image formatting down, but unfortunatly that image is non-free content and therefore can only be used on pages for which a proper fair-use rationale has been provided. It is used on Applewhite's own article because, him being dead, it is not possible to obtain a new, free image and he is the subject of that article. Absent a similarly compelling rationale for inclusion in the Heaven's Gate it simply can't be used there.

I know that's a lot to digest. One of the easiest ways to tell if an image is free is to see if it was uploaded here or at Wikimedia Commons. Commons only hosts free-to-use material so anything there is ok and can be linked in the same manner. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mass murder in 2019

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mass murder in 2019 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster _talk 20:47, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2018 Colts Neck mansion killings

The article 2018 Colts Neck mansion killings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Event without lasting notability, all coverage is from within two weeks of the event in November 2018. Per WP:EVENTCRIT: "Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, accidents, deaths, celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and viral phenomena) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Maidan Shahr attack

I have redirected it to 2019 Afghan military base attack because it was created 17 minutes before you created 2019 Maidan Shahr attack.

You should consider searching on Wikipedia's search bar first before you create the article. You can expand 2019 Afghan military base attack if you still want to expand. Capitals00 (talk) 17:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2018 Colts Neck mansion killings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 Colts Neck mansion killings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Colts Neck mansion killings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Maidan Shar attack

On 22 January 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Maidan Shar attack, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at File:Brian Golsby.jpg. Please stop providing false licensing to images. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:35, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Murdered" war dead

If the Patikul shootout is a mass murder, why do neither of the sources in the article, nor the article, mention anything about murder? Are you making this up? If so, it should be removed per WP:NOR. If the label can be verified, the lead sentence should note it was a mass murder upfront, making the reason for the category clear. There are no BLP concerns on this one, the supposed "murderers" having already been "murdered". InedibleHulk (talk) 05:37, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Prejudice warning

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at 2019 Sebring shooting. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Of the eight sources in the article, zero describe these as murders or a mass murder. They only say he was accused. Everyone has the right to a fair trial, and even if they didn't, this would still clearly be against Wikipedia's verifiability policy. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:54, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And again

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. Your latest round of edit summaries to untried killings suggests you can't distinguish between a murder and a homicide, or a crime and a criminal charge, or a reported fact and a personal opinion. Until you can, you are incompetent to edit crime articles. That's not an insult, it's a recommendation. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:23, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2019 Lahore bombing

The article 2019 Lahore bombing has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:33, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Your addition to Portal:Current events/2019 July 2 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:32, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at List of terrorist incidents in July 2019. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

Please join the discussion at Talk:List of terrorist incidents in July 2019#Military attacks are not terrorism instead of reverting or undoing others' edits (diff, diff, diff, diff). Thank you. – Levivich 23:58, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, fuck you and your stupid lies, you fucking stupid liar! If you need me banned to make your habitual lying here easier, I'd rather you use this legitimate personal attack against me than more of your patent nonsense. You're welcome. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:15, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, "you" refers to 11S117. You're not wrong, Levivich. I daresay you're alright. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:34, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing must stop now

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You have repeatedly reverted my changes with nary an edit summary and completely refusing multiple requests to engage at article talk. Cease and desist this disruptive immediately or I will escalate the matter. Simonm223 (talk) 15:49, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:11S117 reported by User:Levivich (Result: ). Thank you. – Levivich 16:03, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at List of terrorist incidents in July 2019. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:08, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating 2019 Morrisville killings.

User:Rosguill while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

It's not clear that the subject meets WP:NEVENT. Coverage in sources above the local level appears to be limited to the week of the killings, which falls short of the WP:COVERAGE section of NEVENT.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:35, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lamont Stephenson.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lamont Stephenson.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of terrorist incidents in January 2015, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:05, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to List of terrorist incidents in July 2019 does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 01:06, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manchester Arndale stabbing

The article Manchester Arndale stabbing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mental health issue, no fatalities, WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 03:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of terrorist incidents in Month

Hey! I noticed on October 12, 2019 you deleted many entries from articles that were along the lines of List of terrorist incidents in Month, Year (e.g. List of terrorist incidents in May 2019) due to the clause that the guidelines said all terrorist incidents must have a stand-alone article. Do you think we should change this guideline to retain the previous list of terrorist incidents? We could alter the guideline to only require a reliable source to be notable enough for the lists. --Bluecrab2 (talk) 23:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 Dayton shooting, you may be blocked from editing. Stop edit warring. When your edit is disputed, take it to the talk page for consensus or drop it. This is far from the first time you have been told this. The article is under discretionary sanctions and you are risking a block or topic ban. ―Mandruss ☎ 01:06, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Samuel Little alleged victim drawing.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Samuel Little alleged victim drawing.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Minorax (talk) 15:31, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Gamboru bombing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borno (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dulce Maria Alavez.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Dulce Maria Alavez.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 01:14, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Disappearance of Dulce Maria Alavez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disappearance of Dulce Maria Alavez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Dulce Maria Alavez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 10:45, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bampumim Teixeira

The article Bampumim Teixeira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:BLP1E.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBL (talk) 20:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bampumim Teixeira for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bampumim Teixeira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bampumim Teixeira until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JBL (talk) 02:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notability tags

It is completely inappropriate to go around removing notability tags with no or misleading edit summary and marking the edits as minor. --JBL (talk) 02:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I thought it was reasonable since the tags were there for over two years and I saw improvement made to it.

Here are three of the articles on which I reverted you; the diffs show all edits from the time when the tag was added to the present: [1] [2] [3] It is obvious from these that your response is not an honest explanation of your edits. I am curious what the truth behind the lie is -- do you object on principle to the notion of notability? Or something else? --JBL (talk) 03:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've returned to activity, I would like to re-pose my question in the hope of getting a response: do you object on principle to the notion of notability? And if not, would you please explain your actions? --JBL (talk) 11:55, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it's been a while, I'll tell you the criminal ones were due to the age of the notability tag. The animated character was due to my love of the show. It's kind of hard to source cartoon shows. My knowledge for Wikipedia is not the best but the notability tag, I kind of hate that notability tag, it makes me think the article will be deleted. But it won't happen again.

Deletion discussion about Death of Jason Corbett

Hello, 11S117

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Death of Jason Corbett, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Jason Corbett.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:12, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not encyclopedic.

You think I 'should be stopped' because I nominate an article for deletion; I think, judging by the contents of this page, that you have no idea what belongs on Wikipedia.TheLongTone (talk) 16:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair when you nominated the Toronto article, someone brought up a fair point of another article about a single murder. That case made national headlines and instead of giving a good reason to why you want the specific Toronto case deleted, you nominated the other one because it argued against what you said.

Also, there are many articles that are short, so deleting the "Toronto" article based on being a little short is not an argument. We're also talking about an Islamic murder in Canada which is rare. The last attack happening in 2017.

I should've rephrased what I said though, it could be interpreted as like a threat which was not my intention.

yeah, accepted. And I should not have been snippy.But I nominated the second article simply beacuase I couls see no why reason why it deserved an article. It is my experience that if such articles are nominated for deletion when created thet attract a large number of keep votes from people who (imo) don't get WP:NOTNEWS; since for a crime to be notable one criterion is ongoing coverage a second nom when this hasn't happened seems appropriate. TheLongTone (talk) 15:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steven Gordon and Frank Cano

The article Steven Gordon and Frank Cano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO. The crimes that were committed were not notable or nationally recognized.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 15:58, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steven Gordon and Franc Cano for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Gordon and Franc Cano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Gordon and Franc Cano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Inexpiable (talk) 16:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samuel Little drawings of alleged victims.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Samuel Little drawings of alleged victims.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:26, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samuel Little alleged victim portrait.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Samuel Little alleged victim portrait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:26, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

William Lindsey (serial killer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, William Lindsey (serial killer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:04, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:William Lindsey (serial killer)

Hello, 11S117. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:William Lindsey (serial killer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:William Lindsey (serial killer) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Lindsey (serial killer). Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Lindsey (serial killer) (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wingwatchers was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William Lindsey (serial killer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:William Lindsey (serial killer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wingwatchers (talk) 00:33, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 11S117! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wingwatchers (talk) 00:33, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:William Lindsey (serial killer)

Hello, 11S117. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "William Lindsey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:33, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Morrisville killings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morrisville killings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morrisville killings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Happy days, ~ Lindsay^Hello 09:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asasey Hotel attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asasey Hotel attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asasey Hotel attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Traumnovelle (talk) 04:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]