Jump to content

User:DePiep/iso-t

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
USER: /home-E /subpg · /sbox-E · /1 2 3 4 5 6 /help* /news /s-E /x-E /xx-E /row-E  EXTERNAL: EL:w3c-css · TOOLS: WD: rgx101 PETSCAN  · wtech /tpu · commons
WIKI: special:ExpandT Prefix (T:list) #parse {{MAGIC}} H:notes · _TOC_ WikiBlame mw:Lua man (patterns, debug, α) · T:SFW/s (M:,../sandbox· M:String · TFA /better signpost adnws · SPEEDY CFSD · alerts
/unicode: {{T:U+}} m:Uchar · U+abbr · {{ISO15924}} ff conv · {{ISO4217}} BOXES: /chembox /ChemData  · /drugbox T · TG · DEV: /CUR · /taxo · /chemlist · NBSP> < minus>−< NDASH>–< MDASH>—< NOT EQUAL>≠< DOTCIRCLE>◌<
ELEM: pv
/elem · WT · ISO-T symbol-to-data · datarefs · :c:cat:PT · U:PTG · WP:PTG (t)
This box: view · edit
  This list: 

theoretical, notation

[edit]


Our notation

[edit]

Allow me to initiate a side question: how do we notate theoretical isotopes? For now, we could focus on the Big Table (and then spinoff into other places like articles, infoboxes). I myself have no knowledge about the physical backgrounds, so I'll follow your input in this.

The topic. NUBASE2020 § Number of isotopes listed notes 218+45=263 unobserved, estimated ones.

As research goes, after "2020" new research & isotopes appear (observated, theoretical), so we should accomodate such development. If there is a standard approach (in RL science) for isotope status, I'd like to learn. Say, level of theoretical status. And IIRC, there are also Trends in Neighboring Nuclei (TNN) § 3.1 and in AME is Trends from the Mass Surface (TMS). These are theoretical excercises to right? Note: on enwiki TNN and TMS have no entry not even a redirect target (-section).

I'll await your conclusions (above) on whether & when any theoretical isotope should be included at all in the big table.

Question: is a theoretical istope black/white? Or is there a grey area, tied to somewhat existing isotopes? See 31Ne: "Decay mode shown is energetically allowed, but has not been experimentally observed to occur in this nuclide."

References. always, IMO, non-NUBASE2020 data should be added in the big table, as a ref. Isotope-all data in column 1 (with the 123Xx ID); specific sources, say on half-life, can go in the specific column.

While refs NUBASE2020 and AME2020 can be added always (optionally as named). Can we adopt a standard in this? eg, "all data is from NUBASE2020, unless otherwise sourced"? (transition to 'NUBASE2024' data to be handled; experience says this happens at an isotope-by-isotope base, ie row by row). All sources appear as reference, not as table footnote.

In-table footnotes:

main isos

[edit]
  • 2023.
User:ComplexRational/Isotopes#Main_isotopes_of_elements

Nuclear technology

[edit]

isos in MED

[edit]
{{Nuclear technology}}

Sections in Radiopharmaceutical

med imaging

[edit]
  1. scintigraphy
  2. Bone scintigraphy
  3. Cholescintigraphy
  4. DMSA scan
  5. Dacryoscintigraphy
  6. Gallium scan
  7. Gallium scan
  8. Gastric emptying study
  9. Immunoscintigraphy
  10. Indium-111 WBC scan
  11. Octreotide scan
  12. Radioactive iodine uptake test
  13. Radioisotope renography
  14. Radionuclide angiography
  15. Radionuclide ventriculography (R)Radionuclide angiography
  16. Scintimammography (R)Molecular breast imaging
  17. Sestamibi parathyroid scintigraphy (R)Sestamibi parathyroid scan
  18. Ventilation/perfusion scan
[edit]