Talk:Turok (video game)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Turok (video game) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Turok" video game – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Story

I added the basic story...feel free to add and take from it as you wikipedians see fit. I tried not to add in too many details, but it does contain major spoilers. [[User:SonicNiGHT|SonicNiGHT]] (talk) 15:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection

As it is right now, the Turok (video game) page redirects to Turok: Dinosaur Hunter. In the past, this was all well and good because it was the first Turok game, the same way that Halo (video game) redirects to Halo: Combat Evolved. Except now, this new game is coming out, and its title is just "Turok", making it a better fit for Turok (video game). Anyone else think we should re-redirect that page to point in this direction? Master Deusoma (talk) 06:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me no one else cares one way or the other, and since it seems a sound enough idea, I've gone ahead and done it. If you disagree very strongly, feel free to drop me a message. Master Deusoma (talk) 02:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed creatures

The confirmed dinosaurs need reliable sources to go with them. Merely saying they're confirmed is not enough. Also images aren't good sources because even though they may be proof to some, but to people who don't know the game or what a specific dinosaur looks like, they could be images of any creature from any game. ●Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 03:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maedis here, if you go to www.turok.com you can see a list of all the creatures they have. I have edited to dinosaur list ,as one dinosaur I found did not actually exist in the game. It is not on the turok site, and I have already beaten the game on both normal, and inhuman levels and I can confirm that the Carnosaurous does not appear in the game. I have edited the dinosaur list with the creatures I know are in the game, added a section for the Soldier Bugs and Flying dragonflys, and a section for known bosses (bosses i could name off the top of my head)

I also cleaned up the plot a bit, but that was before I signed on into my account.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Maedis (talk • contribs)

I found the section on the creatures on that site and that'll be a very good source. Unfortunately the website's entirely in flash so it's tricky to create a source that links directly to it. I'll add the link into the top of the section for now. ●Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 02:29, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can the Giganotosaurus really can't be killed. Also is there a dinosaur that gets killed by a Dilphosaurus in the game that resembles a raptor? Johnny542 (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Development" section

For anyone interested in creating a "Development" section, you can use these "Awakening The Giants: The Making of Turok" videos as a source, which I found on The Electric Playground homepage. I haven't watched the videos as I don't have sound on this computer. --Silver Edge (talk) 09:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Perlman as Slade

Anyone find it odd that Ron Perlman voices a character name Slade in this game and also voices the character Slade (Deathstroke) in Teen Titans? Anyone know if his character was given the name Slade intentionally in Turok or is it just happenstance that they are both the same. 76.116.109.221 (talk) 12:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coincidence. (JoeLoeb (talk) 00:37, 27 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Touchstone Pictures?

What is with the lie in the infobox? I don't touch your precious wiki articles on account of all the lies. So, could someone please remove the Pictures part in that infobox. It is a hilarious lie.

Whomever did that clearly didn't even notice the oddly colored logo for Disney's intended videogame branding.EMU-LMAO (talk) 22:56, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:TurokTouchstone.PNG

Not sure what the problem is.--Koji† 03:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That says "TouchStone" not "TouchStone Pictures", don't you know anything about product branding? Totally different logos.

A "TouchStone" logo is not the same as literally putting a "TouchStone Pictures" logo on a box. "TouchStone Pictures" is a brand intended for the mature Disney films. "TouchStone" is a brand used by Disney for mature videogames.

I don't see the problem with not seeing this error.

--EMU-LMAO (talk) 22:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious Narrative Bias In "reception"

I wonder what Disney interactive studio tool listening to Gary Cooper entered this section, bullshit, just like the studio and their executives, even a passing review will show the bias in section Reception, as well as falling to list AOTS's ripping of the game, yet making the positive G-4 reviews glisten in the limelight, as well as recapping with a curved narrative after two or three un-cited references to why it sucked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.152.119 (talk) 08:37, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel?

Any news on a sequel or a remake of Turok 2:SOE? 71.234.96.237 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:01, 25 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Pegi rating

Iv'e got turok as a 16+ under the pegi rating, is this right or not? --84.68.182.61 (talk) 17:57, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Turok has been certified by other companies as well. So you are partially correct. I went to England and the game rating was '16' but meanwhile in Portugal it's rating is '18'. SportingLisboaXI (talk) 20:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandlism in sequel section

Just read what it says,profanities and Walt Disney —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bloodawn5 (talk • contribs) 06:38, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Turok Movie 2012? + Turok Rights

Many rumours about a Turok movie for 2011 & 2012 starring Adam Beach? Need mor informaation to create a sub-section, let alone an article. Anyone willing to reasearch into more info?

Also since Propaganda Games has now closed down, who currently has rights to the Turok Brand? Is it the parent company Walt Disney Interactive Studios? Or have they sold the rights to another company? Someone also needs to look into this in further detail. SportingLisboaXI (talk) 17:17, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Page moved to Turok (2008 video game). Vegaswikian (talk) 23:39, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Turok (2008 Video Game) → Turok (video game) — Unnecessary disambiguation. There are no other video game articles named "Turok". --Mika1h (talk) 21:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OPPOSE - I edited the name for a reason. There are many Turok video games, although the title of the game is officially Turok, there is no harm changing it to Turok (2008 Video Game). The reason is that the game is called 'Turok' it was made in 2008 and is a video game. Simply it being called Turok misleads other users as it could be the Comic Character Turok or another Turok Video game. With it's name how it is at the moment, ensures no-one can be misleaded. Thanks SportingLisboaXI (talk) 20:46, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; many of the games at Turok (series) are called just Turok in colloquial usage. I would support a move to the proper capitalization, Turok (2008 video game). Powers ^T 14:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Turok (2008 video game) (lower case) per WP:MOSCAPS, but otherwise leave as is. 137.205.222.193 (talk) 19:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And also retarget Turok (video game) to Turok (series) per reasons given by LtPowers. 137.205.222.193 (talk) 19:28, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Free, open source shooter games

Why is this article in Category:Free, open source shooter games? I can't seen find any reference that it's open source (or even free). --EoD (talk) 13:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it from that as well as Category:Free first-person shooters, as it is absolutely neither free nor open source. dririan (talk) 06:21, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Turok (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080202115902/http://www.gametrailers.com:80/player/30162.html to http://www.gametrailers.com/player/30162.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Turok (BVG game)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Turok (BVG game) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 24#Turok (BVG game) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 09:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]