Jump to content

Talk:Sora (Kingdom Hearts)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSora (Kingdom Hearts) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 28, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
November 16, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
April 7, 2016Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Removal of 358/2 Days Section

[edit]

Sora is not really physically present in 358/2 Days and thus the section should be removed from the page. Also the section seems to circle the stories of Roxas instead of Sora. Thus I think the 358/2 Days section should be deleted. Any objections?KiasuKiasiMan (talk) 15:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

this one is pretty difficult, he didnt have much of a role to 358/2 days but others did. so I'm going to say that it should be removed or mention that he is a playable character in 358/2 days but not physically there in the plot.Bread Ninja (talk) 19:55, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Original Art

[edit]

Is it just me,or does Sora in his original art form have a donkey tail? Were they trying to create a Zidane with a key,a donkey tail (Instead of a monkey tail) and spikey brown hair? 71.201.192.39 (talk) 20:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although WP:NOTAFORUM applies, I have to disagree. I've always thought it looked like a lion's tail. - Tainted Conformity SCREAM 02:57, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Famitsu article

[edit]

[1] - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 03:57, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! Do you if it's the same issue mentioned in the reception section?Tintor2 (talk) 13:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, can't say that I do. Sorry. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No prob.Tintor2 (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Old vs New Image

[edit]

I'm not going to revert immediately, but I do want to argue in favor of the replacing image. In the current image, KH1 Sora is a flipped and badly cropped image, which isn't the case in the new picture. Also, I believe the newer image is a smaller filesize as well, which I'm pretty sure is a good thing. Just my two cents. - Tainted Conformity SCREAM 09:52, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Besides, the KH2 Sora is actually a concept artwork while old one was taken from the cover of KH2.Tintor2 (talk) 23:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly written

[edit]

There's about six sentences in here that don't make much sense and I think they have to be rewritten. For example, "This was emphasized in Birth by Sleep's secret ending, game in which he hoped players would like to see him." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.125.17.160 (talk) 02:05, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ventus' "Reincarnation"

[edit]

I don't quite know how I would edit it myself, since I don't know whether to remove the passage or replace it with a mention of what is actually being said, butas someone who speaks Japanese and owns the Ultimania that is being referenced, I'd like to note the sentence claiming that Sora was originally supposed to be "Ventus reborn" is wrong. The quoted text (which, by the way, is quoted from the wrong page. The page meant is actually 646.) actually says "Originally I meant for [the voice Ventus hears in the beginning of the game] to be Sora's heart from before Sora's birth, but since foreign opinions claimed that "Heart and soul don't exist before birth", I changed that plot point to what it currently is."194.166.123.143 (talk) 00:45, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 10 external links on Sora (Kingdom Hearts). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sora (Kingdom Hearts). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2021

[edit]

At the 4th paragraph of Critical response section after the sentence "According to series director Masahiro Sakurai, Sora had been the winner of the Super Smash Bros. for 3DS and Wii U Fighter Ballot in 2015, and Sakurai was well aware of the various fan campaigns advocating for Sora's inclusion in the series. Sakurai also described Sora's inclusion in Super Smash Bros. as a "huge undertaking", and "perfect" as the concluding fighter for Super Smash Bros. Ultimate" add this: He also said that adding Sora to the game was much more difficult than adding other fighters.[1] Also can you fill other citations properly, I mean Wikipedia has tools. 220.116.196.43 (talk) 10:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. I don't think we need to add that, as it's already described as a huge undertaking in an earlier sentence. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:09, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2021 (2)

[edit]

Can someone format all the citations/ref on the article. There are tons of cited sources without the name of the website and they aren't even formatted correctly. Thanks 180.44.113.234 (talk) 21:36, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Smash sources seem to be the ones lacking formats but I think a bot can properly do it. Don't know how it works.Tintor2 (talk) 22:22, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Please provide the updated references. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Smash image

[edit]

I replaced the Smash image with a compilation of all forms to provide more coverage. A website had all of them.Tintor2 (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Designs

[edit]

I found commentary about each of Nomura's designs the character tends to wear through every installment added it to the article. You think now the Smash compilation of Sora's looks now fits the non-free criteria of being added to the article?Tintor2 (talk) 14:09, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've been away for a while so I don't know how stringent the non-free criteria has become (seemed like it always more strict every year). But given the amount of developer commentary and bit of critical commentary, there's enough of a thread there I think. A few thoughts though:
  • Since the image is from Smash, maybe insert the image in the "Other appearances" section to provide more context.
  • Mentioning that outfits from the various games are alternate costumes in Smash would help strengthen the connection.
  • I think there was commentary about his Smash outfits when his inclusion was first announced. That may provide an extra sentence of context in the "Reception" section.
  • If this is too many non-free media, you may have to weigh how much the other image file contributes and decide which one provides more.
Hope it helps. Glad to see such an iconic character (and personal favorite) have a comprehensive article. (Guyinblack25 talk 19:38, 25 February 2022 (UTC))[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Kingdom Hearts II KeyBlade INFO has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 10 § Kingdom Hearts II KeyBlade INFO until a consensus is reached. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]