Talk:List of accolades received by Red Dead Redemption 2

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of accolades received by Red Dead Redemption 2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "List of accolades received by Red Dead Redemption 2" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

List of accolades received by Red Dead Redemption 2 is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

List of accolades received by Red Dead Redemption 2 is part of the Red Dead Redemption 2 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on February 21, 2020.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 6, 2019	Featured list candidate	Promoted
June 4, 2020	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 5, 2019.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Red Dead Redemption 2 was the highest-rated game on Metacritic in 2018?

Current status: Featured list

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Bejeweled Stars (1 participant)
Melee (game terminology) (2 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (4 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (8 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

IGN

Correct me if I am wrong but I think the IGN should be in Italics as seen on its respective article Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 23:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right. Articles (and editors) seem to go back and forth on this, but italics seems correct. – Rhain ☔ 00:04, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of the award context

With the recent critical media and social media responses to RDR2 receiving an award for "continuous game improvement" from Steam but this article not including such responses it on the grounds of "Mostly unreliable, and doesn’t change the fact that it’s irrelevant and not notable. People have opinions about awards all the time." I can only doubt the context of all of the awards listed here and their legitimacy. 80.254.216.102 (talk) 16:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you can, and possibly should. But adding a footnote every time an award winner is questioned or criticised is not what this article is about. The criticisms seem more appropriate for The Steam Awards than here. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 08:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can see the value of dividing the list of awards and their nuances separately. 80.254.216.102 (talk) 14:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]