Talk:List of Interplay games

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Indexes

This alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Emote (1 participant)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (3 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Earthworm Jim

A ton of platforms are missing from the main article list and the EWJ entry is missing many many entries. I will try to update this given time if no one beats me to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.81.94.75 (talk) 16:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Games

Pretty good source of games here http://www.interplay.com/support/index.php Might be a good place to look and see what we have missed. SGT-Craig (talk) 03:48, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

After we move all content to Category: Interplay Entertainment games, really there's no point in keeping this page alive. I propose its deletion. Punkalyptic (talk) 23:30, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. When the list looked like this], I probably would've agreed. But now that we're converting it to look like this, it has much more value and information than a simple category does. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 01:49, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I really like the format of this page and I think we should keep it. It is providing a lot of good details at a glance as opposed to the other page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.83.87.8 (talk) 03:54, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ED3N

Finding the right source for ED3N was painfully difficult. No joke. It is as if Interplay had been erased from the public eye, hence the scarcity of the news regarding the game. When I gave the source that led to the removal of the entry (that I did not even add to begin with), I never claimed or believed that what I gave was a reliable source. Do not let what I say belie what I did. Instead, I resorted to looking for any virtues of the author's journalistic past and believed in my conclusion that, having worked for Maxim and Brooklyn Magazine, that author met the bare minimum requirements for WP:SPS as a subject-matter expert (in retrospect, that seems foolish since I did not check to make sure that her work was cited by other reputable sources). It did not help that I believe I treated primary sources such as Interplay's own press releases as inherently inferior to secondary ones. I was not satisfied giving the source for the entry, and no doubt neither was the one who removed it altogether.

Speaking of primary sources, I found that Interplay on its website linked to a website called NFT Culture that I would never have considered citing, except that the linked page appears to be an official press release—an interesting location for such, as opposed to its own website. This is not satisfying either. With that Interplay-linked source, is the ED3N entry thus salvageable or better left out for now, if not for good? Free Media Kid$ 18:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do we have expansion packs in a section at the bottom? It does not make much sense to me. If I were looking at say a title in the "C" section like Castles and did not find the Castles with the expansion I would not scroll all the way to Z and then the expansions section. Title need to be in one area. Can you consolidate them?

Also a good source is https://www.mobygames.com/company/45/interplay-entertainment-corp/games/sort:-date/page:0/ 2600:1700:A951:A10:1C1E:57E8:DE76:C424 (talk) 00:59, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]