Jump to content

Talk:Donkey Kong Country Returns

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleDonkey Kong Country Returns has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 16, 2010Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
February 12, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

This game now exists

[edit]

Primary Sources

[edit]
  • This article relies a bit too much on primary sources such as Nintendo press release and publications produced by Nintendo. The other sources seem to be based entirely on the press release from Nintendo. Might this article have been created a bit early?--RadioFan (talk) 19:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Main thing was confirmed at E3 , the other information is from the booths and playground post-e3 , provided by the E3 insiders those who are there live at location , if something's not correct it will be fixed. Xowets (talk) 22:13, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • By the way , the references were fixed by now , it's all in the DKCR iwata asks , and you can find articled on the web about Retro Studios (3) core developers departure , and a "break" from metroid games, also about the development is also at iwata asks , this issue is resolved , but there are some references and citations to be added that already exist. Xowets (talk) 22:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Release Date

[edit]

DKCR comes out November 21 2010. I assume this is the NA release date. 194.78.37.122 (talk) 12:51, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original Composers

[edit]

Most of the music in this game is arranged from the original Donkey Kong Country soundtrack, but none of the original composers (David Wise, Robin Beanland, Eveline Fischer) are listed. Were they even credited in the game at all? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.195.119 (talk) 08:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think they were credited. Original composers are not listed in the composer field of the infobox, but can be mentioned in the development section if reliable sources exist. Prime Blue (talk) 14:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dev info

[edit]

http://gdc.gamespot.com/story/6301842/retro-dissects-donkey-kong-country-returns/ Enjoy! Axem Titanium (talk) 01:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bias?

[edit]

Did anyone writing this article even look to see if there was negative criticism for it? I've look around and seen quite a bit, but nothing that'd probably stand out as a proper source. What about comments on the motion controls? Or giving the player up to 4 Hearts, but then having levels where the slightest tap ended in an instant loss? What about how there's hardly any truly original music since most of it is reused or remixed tracks? I only saw one almost missed mention of criticism at the end of the Reception section. Literally like 1 or 2 sentences out of that whole overly large paragraph. That whole thing practically reads like hype.--68.111.242.222 (talk) 10:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can see what you're talking about -- I added a {pov} to the section. It needs to be expanded to integrate less "positive" reviews. Salvidrim (talk) 10:53, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Did some more looking, and this is the closest I could find that comments on some of the negative aspects. http://www.gamesradar.com/donkey-kong-country-returns-review/?page=2 I don't think it's quite the right kind of source, though.--68.111.242.222 (talk) 11:51, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
GamesRadar is already said to have given a 8/10 review (but without source, which is bad). Feel free to link this and integrate the review. Salvidrim (talk) 12:02, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the criticism. - RoyBoy 03:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Donkey Kong Country Returns/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khanassassin (talk · contribs) 10:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let's get the review started, shall we?

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Seems to have no problems here. Pass.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All sources are reliable, no OR found. Pass.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Gameplay, Development, Story, Reception... - Nothing's missing. I think the "Story" section could get a bit expended, though it isn't obligatory. Once again, Pass. Let's move on.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
    Seems pretty good.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Maybe there could be an image of a developer (director/programmer...) added, though it isn't obligatory. Pass.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    All I have to say is: "What an article". Nice job, King, this is an absolute GA. PASS --Khanassassin (talk) 10:53, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I actually don't agree with this review. The game play section is far from perfect (it actually seems to jump around a lot and doesn't quite focus on what the game play actually is) and the Story has a lot of OR. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 16:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Plot references (there are a few in this article, enough) are typically recommended but not obligatory for Video game articles. The issue has been talked over many times on the Wikipedia:VG talk page, and that has been the consensus. --Khanassassin (talk) 16:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I added an image to Development, and another ref to Plot. Yeah, Plot is short but this isn't a plot-based game (similar to Mario games). Gary King (talk · scripts) 05:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Donkey Kong Country Returns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Donkey Kong Country Returns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Donkey_Kong_Country_Returns&oldid=1217662330"