Talk:Bug Fables: The Everlasting Sapling

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 May 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) on 22 April 2020.

Video games: Indie Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the indie task force.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Why is this up for deletion?

Boredlizard (talk) 06:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article was barebones when the notice was added. It was just a short paragraph with not even five sources. Now that the game has much more coverage and the article is the much more elaborate, the notice will go away once the "Keep" consensus is reached here. Condontdoit296 (talk) 19:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

I have added as much as I can for the reception section of the article. If anyone feels the need to add more to it or change it to improve it, please go right ahead. Captain Galaxy (talk) 19:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not very short synopsis

The plot section covers too much to be put in the "synopsis", while the rest (especially the gameplay) gets almost nothing in comparison. Should that be changed, or is it fine like that?

In the former case, I would probably just rename that section to "Setting" and leave the rest as is. Either way, I'll try to at least mention some more details about the gameplay, like how each character works. Feel free to revert it if I get something wrong.

Also, Nero is cute. cogsan (talk) 12:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i have a question

am i allowed to keep writing out the synopsis (because it only covers the first chapter) or should i leave it as-is? --pandadonuts-- (talk) 22:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i only recently shortened it to just the first chapter, because that's a synopsis, and not the entire plot

if you want to revert my edit or rewrite the entire plot in what the manual of style suggests should be 700 words or less, go ahead cogsan _{• (give me attention) • (see my deeds)} 13:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]