Sorry to hear we might be losing you as our EIC, Smallbones, you've been great to have. While I did look at guest-editoring, I don't think I could reliably commit, and certainly there are many better, more involved, souls than my very occasional participating. Whether you take the guest route or hand over the reins more permanently, thank you for your work thus far and in the future. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:57, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the work you've done! I've been a regular reader of the Signpost since I became active on Wikipedia and have found it invaluable in understanding this community time and time again. I would be interested in getting involved - certainly not as editor-in-chief, but perhaps as a copyeditor or writer. I'll drop a note in the Newsroom. Ganesha811 (talk) 23:36, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for what you have done with The Signpost of these past few months. Hope you have a wonderful time being not that in EIC chair. HawkAussie (talk) 10:40, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Smallbones, thanks for your excellent work as editor-in-chief. The Signpost under you is like Wikipedia's version of The Intercept, with incisive reporting that stays true to the facts on hand, even in the face of controversy. — Newslingertalk16:11, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Smallbones, speaking as a former editor-in-chief, this is a massive loss for the Signpost. Thank you so, so much for all of the time you've invested in turning this publication around; I know that I and so many others have greatly appreciated it. I'm very glad to hear that you'll remain with the Signpost, even in a reduced capacity, and I hope the next editor-in-chief takes advantage of your experience. Ed[talk][majestic titan]16:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You've been wonderful at the editor job. I like to believe one or more editors will step forward with the wherewithal to keep the Signpost rolling along. Thanks for linking the brain fog piece. Until just now, for various reasons, I thought it was just me who was having these issues and wondering why the sudden symptoms arising within the last 12+ months. It makes sense now - that's when the pandemic hit. We are all living through the real life Groundhog Day Your first obligation is yourself and your near-and-dear. We will survive, and hopefully someone in Wikipedia has the talents and willingness to step into the editor's shoes. We'll be fine. Take care of yourself. — Maile (talk) 01:52, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't expecting this, but the pandemic has surprised all of us. You did great work taking over The Signpost after its vacancy crisis, and I was very happy to have the opportunity to work with you on several occasions. I would've liked to have been more active in the paper over the last year, but pandemic university learning has really ground me down. We all deserve a break. One of the nice thing's about Wikipedia is that it isn't an obligation so there shouldn't be pressure to perform tasks here when real life is calling. I can't wait for summer myself, I want to get back to the river and go catfishing! -Indy beetle (talk) 04:51, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Smallbones, what can I say but repeat the exact words of The ed17: ...speaking as a former editor-in-chief, this is a massive loss for the Signpost. Thank you so, so much for all of the time you've invested in turning this publication around; I know that I and so many others have greatly appreciated it. I'm very glad to hear that you'll remain with the Signpost, even in a reduced capacity, and I hope the next editor-in-chief takes advantage of your experience. And I will add that when I stepped in to rescue the publication in 2018, what the readers didn't realise and still don't, is that it befalls the E-in-C to contribute most of the content (with a lot of help from Bri of course). What's left is a plain old newsletter with the regular self-aggrandising from the WMF - who have enough sites of their own - accounting for a large part of the publication. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:28, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Kudpung: for this and the comment at MFD. I've already denied most of this above (and I'm sticking to it!) The biggest thing I remember from your advice 2 years ago is approx. "There's a reason Signpost EIC's seldom last more than 2 years." I forgot the reason, but it could be any of 4 or 5. I suppose it's that EICs have to have very thick skins, or be 100%+ right 100% of the time (which is of course impossible). The best we can do is just triple check and document everything! Smallbones(smalltalk)03:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it's impossible, Smallbones, to be right 100% of the time, but it has become a sport on Wikipedia to hound people who have a perceived responsibility (such as admins and The Signpost EIC), to the point of driving them off the project, by people who deliberately look for such opportunities. Note therefore, that nowadays other users are not exactly jostling to become admins or Editors-in-Chief of The Signpost. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I know I'm a bit (well..., a lot actually) late, but I feel the need to express my thanks for your work as well. Your writing is top notch and that's beside all the editing work I can hardly imagine. Your shoes are well nigh impossible to fill! Dutchy45 (talk) 14:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all the work. Just having The Signpost appear brightens my month. So much so I don't begrudge you the perks and massive salary. I hope someone will interview you for publication here. You could not have done such a good job without enjoying the work. I expect it is very hard to let go—enjoy the freed time with your family. — Neonorange (Phil) 07:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
as a long-ago regular contributor, I know how much work it is to keep up with the Signpost week in and out. Thanks so much for all of your time and work. To everyone else: consider writing for the Signpost!! -- phoebe / (talk to me) 01:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
← Back to From the editor