Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ukraine/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

"Zaporozhye Oblast" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Zaporozhye Oblast has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 3 § Zaporozhye Oblast until a consensus is reached. Kk.urban (talk) 15:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Mykhailo Hrushevsky

An IP seems to have slanted, if not vandalized, the Mykhailo Hrushevsky article with a very strong anti-ukrainian POV a few weeks ago without it being noticed it seems (adding "fictional" to descriptions of his historical writing for instance). As there have been other seemingly useful revisions since then I haven't reverted, haven't edited on en.wiki in a long while so not sure what to do, hope someone here can help. Thanks! Susuman77 (talk) 22:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Reverted it along with other questionable edits they had made, put the article on your watch list if you care, since evidently there is not much attention if fairly obvious POV pushing gets through. TylerBurden (talk) 19:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Mezhyhirya Monastery

Mezhyhirya Monastery has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. NLeeuw (talk) 13:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Americans killed during the Russian invasion of Ukraine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Americans killed during the Russian invasion of Ukraine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Americans killed during the Russian invasion of Ukraine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Traumnovelle (talk) 20:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Chynadiieve#Requested move 30 April 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Chynadiieve#Requested move 30 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 20:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Ludmila Orestovna Gabel

Hello everyone - I have just created the above article and would appreciate any help members of this WikiProject could give. Thanks GnocchiFan (talk) 10:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Stress marks in East Slavic words

Please join the work on the content of Wikipedia:Stress marks in East Slavic words. - Altenmann >talk 12:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Are there common abbreviations for oblast names?

Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 18:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

I don't think so. I've never encountered any, and searching "абревіації областей" on Google returns nothing useful. To my knowledge the only first-level administrative division that has a common abbreviation is Autonomous Republic of Crimea (ARC in English / АРК in Ukrainian). Shwabb1 (talk) 07:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Though it's kinda sad as they would be so useful... Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 07:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Infoboxes for settlements in Crimea

The infoboxes of Crimean settlements are a mess. The "country" field is sometimes indicated as Ukraine and Russia, Ukraine (occupied by Russia), disputed, or left empty. Generally only the de facto administrative divisions are included that were de jure abolished by Ukraine in 2023. I've recently been fixing the infoboxes of various Ukrainian cities for consistency, so when it came to Crimea I tried to follow the structure akin to the one in Luhansk and Donetsk, indicating both Ukrainian and Russian administrative divisions. But when @Mellk (whom I'm pinging as this discussion might be of interest) reverted my changes in Alupka and Alushta I realized that there's no concensus on this, so now I'm bringing up this topic here. Shwabb1 (talk) 11:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

I think there was consensus from 2014 to include de facto/de jure and most if not all settlements followed this but since 2022 there have been arbitrary changes made to this in certain articles as well as the template (which is now deleted). For example there was one POV editor who changed it to just Ukraine in some but not all articles (and they are now indeffed). There is no consensus to change this for occupied settlements in the mainland since 2022 but for Crimea, there has not really been any discussion for this as far as I am aware (and probably not enough interest). Mellk (talk) 04:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

I don't see much difference between the two versions of Alupka and Alushta. Cf. Kyrenia which is in a similar situation, only for a longer period, I think it's closer to the stable version. Alaexis_¿question? 20:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Developing Countries WikiContest

Starting this July, we will see a new contest on the scene - the Developing Countries WikiContest (WP:DCWC)! Think of it as a WikiCup but only for articles and media on developing countries.

Competitors may submit GAs, GTs, FAs, FTs, FLs, FPs, and DYK and ITN entries from/on developing countries to gain points and climb the leaderboard. Points are also awarded to those who review GAs, FAs and FLs.

Ukraine is listed as a developing country for the purposes of this contest and articles related to it are eligible to be submitted for points, so I encourage everyone here to sign up and compete with editors from around the world to create high-quality content!

Append your name to the DCWC signup page today!

Best wishes, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (^{talk to me!}/_{my edits}) 07:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

New settlement type

So I've initially raised this concern in the Krasna Hora talk page, but I guess this is a more appropriate place to ask about it as it potentially impacts hundreds of articles. I've just checked a similar discussion from 30 November 2023 and the classification changes still seemed inconclusive back then (no change in practice). Therefore, I'll quote my original concern:

@Ykvach: Do you have proof/evidence that Krasna Hora would now be considered a "rural settlement" and not a "village"? Because from what I understood from the new, late 2023, law is that a settlement with less than 5k people would become a village. By the way, did any specific change even become official? Because it's one thing to approve a new principle, it's another to implement it in reality. We should at least have a total number of villages and rural settlements under this new classification. Otherwise this would seem like WP:OR, sadly.

Alternativelly, is it too early to make such massive changes throughout Wikipedia? Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 21:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: You've justified your edits with this before, but that still seems like WP:OR because the new classifications depend on population and structure of the settlement. The appropriate Ukrainian ministry/body should do this reclassification, not us. We should not interpret laws and make such large scale decisions from them. Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 02:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

The fact is there are no urban-type settlements in Ukraine anymore. If the government makes more subtle classification, for example, upgrades some to cities, we will upgrade the articles. We recently had a long discussion about it, with a few participants, but I do not remember where it was. Ymblanter (talk) 05:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm still split on this... I would greatly appreciate if you linked the previous discussion. Do you remember at least if it was in this project space or a random settlement talk page? Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 05:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

I guess it was on one of the more general talk pages, Populated places in Ukraine or smth similar. Ymblanter (talk) 21:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Furthermore, if you guys are making interim decisions, why not already adopt the 5k people village-settlement threshold? Or at least word the change as an implication instead of an official fact? Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 06:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

If there is a law in force about 5k I will be happy to update the articles. Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

What do you mean? It's literally stated in Populated places in Ukraine#Rural populated places. Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 21:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

I would like to see some sources that this has been implemented. Ukraine is infamous for not complying with their own laws at all levels. Ymblanter (talk) 06:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

xD Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 15:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

The law doesn't exactly work exactly as written. All villages, rural settlements, cities keep their status, but the law introduces certain thresholds that settlements need to reach to change status. The process of up/downgrading the status must be initiated by the local council. Shwabb1 (talk) 11:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Interesting. So the urban-type to rural settlement is automatic, but the redistribution among villages and rural settlements is gradual and on a case-by-case basis? Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 17:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes. For example, Slobozhanske Settlement Council, after a local survey, sent a request to the Verkhovna Rada to upgrade the status from rural settlement to city. In the document they sent it is noted that the current population is estimated to be 12,329 with predominantly (~90%) multi-storey housing, which means that Slobozhanske passes both population and population density thresholds. Shwabb1 (talk) 04:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Cool! Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 04:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

I am not sure why you called this an interim decision. A law entered in force, and there are sources which describe the implementation. Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Interim because the official classification will likely have quite a few differences. Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 21:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

@Ymblanter and Ykvach: By the way, isn't the new classification not recognized in Russian controlled territories? Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 20:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

It is not recognized by Russia, obviously. Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Then the articles should mention that (that de facto they're still considered urban-type), of course. Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 20:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

I tried to insert similar things in the past, I encountered a pushback from a bunch of users telling me that what Russia thinks about the territories it controls is irrelevant. Some of these users eventually got blocked indef / banned, but others are still around. Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

WP:NPOV is non-negotiable. Their argument is basically worthless. We should try to implement that again. I would recommend a footnote in the infobox and an extra sentence in the body. What do you think? Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 00:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please correct me if I'm wrong about this, but AFAIK the exact designation does not actually matter that much in the law of either country. Therefore the way I would recommend writing these articles would be to not mention the settlement types prominently in the first place. Then somewhere in the article body, we can mention briefly that the designation of the settlement is disputed. Example: "Ukraine, which is internationally recognized as having sovereignty over [name of place], designates it a rural-type settlement. However, Russia, which illegally occupies [name of place], de facto administrates it as an urban-type settlement". This is similar to what I've already done in a lot of articles about occupied places where the raion is disputed, because the raions were never really important either.

By the way, does anyone actually have the relevant law about urban-type settlements in Russia? I've taken a look at the relevant section at urban-type settlement but was not able to really parse it in a useful way. I don't doubt the overall premise that Russia doesn't recognize the changes, but I think it might be useful to double-check what exactly the Russian classifications are. HappyWith (talk) 14:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

not mention the settlement types prominently in the first place How should we write the first sentence of the articles though? Because they're mostly: "[place name] is a [settlement_type] in [administrative subdivisions], Ukraine." Should we just say the generic settlement in the first place and then go deeper somewhere else?

Furthermore, I would be more careful with overgeneralizations and negative connotations in the explainer paragraph. For example, "which is internationally recognized..." implies all countries recognize the Ukrainian control. Pretty sure not all countries were fond of the way Ukraine handled the separatism in those regions. Further ahead, "illegally" unnecessarily give a heavy negative value judgment on Russia. "Occupies" already implies that, and we don't need to go into a short analysis of legality, who's right or wrong, evil or not, in every settlement article. Especially since Ukraine did illegal things too. Just gotta keep the text dry and with neutral wording.

but I think it might be useful to double-check what exactly the Russian classifications are. Do you mean in Russia or Donbas? I think that if we simply say they don't recognize the new law, then we can get away with simply implying that whatever was the old type still stands, unless they themselves have changed it since. Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 17:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Should we just say the generic settlement in the first place and then go deeper somewhere else?

Yeah, that's what I was thinking. As for your criticisms of the connotations and generalizations, the exact wording doesn't really matter, it was just the general gist I was trying to get across, which I think we agree on.

Do you mean in Russia or Donbas? I was under the impression Russia mostly adopted the laws of the LPR and DPR when it annexed those regions. You're probably right that the specifics aren't that important here. HappyWith (talk) 16:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Agreed. Regarding internal wiki categories, WP:POV doesn't apply right? Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 16:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: What do you think? Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 20:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

We mention the type of settlement for every other country, I do not see why we should not do it for Ukraine. Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

The Russian classifier, OKATO, would indicate that urban-type settlements remain urban-type settlements. One could argue that that document is outdated, but at least we have a basis to assert that the latest Russian understanding is that they are urban-type. In fact, it seems that all Ukrainian changes are ignored, for example Bakhmut is still referred to as Artemovsk in the document.

With this in mind, I argue that for the sake of WP:NPOV the classifications of both parties should be equally displayed (no footnotes for the Russian POV) in infoboxes and text, but with the Ukrainian classification appearing first for the sake of notability, larger recognition and because order can be more arbitrary. "de facto" and "de jure" should not always (maybe the 2024 captures are still not "de jure" for Russia, idk) be used because the occupied towns are also both "de facto" and "de jure" following the Russian classification in the Russian and local POV. Therefore, the different classifications should be distinguished by "per Russia/Ukraine" or "according to Russia/Ukraine".

It should not be solely stated that those settlements "were" considered urban-type as that is only for the Ukrainian POV. So the explanations should also be amended. I also propose to revive the old category as it is still helpful for historic purposes and to respect WP:NPOV. Alexis Coutinho (talk) 20:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Or god forbid, time could be spent on something more productive. TylerBurden (talk) 23:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm mostly trying to build a consensus at this stage, in case isolated editors complain in the future.

Btw, it's easy to say "why bother" when the current state is already favorable to the person. Alexis Coutinho (talk) 05:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Guidelines on including Russian spelling for location names?

Are there any specific guidelines, policies, or precedents on whether or not I should include the Russian spelling of location names? If I'm creating a new article on a village, for example, should I include "Something (Ukrainian: щось; Russian: Что-нибудь) is a village..."? Thanks! – Primium (talk) 18:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

The relevant guideline is WP:NCGN, according to it Relevant foreign language names (one used by at least 10% of sources in the English language or that is used by a group of people which used to inhabit this geographical place) are permitted. Of course "relevance" is somewhat subjective. I would add the Russian name either if it has been commonly used in English (like Odessa) or if the locality has been occupied and annexed by Russia in which case the Russian name is clearly used by the inhabitants. Alaexis_¿question? 19:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Alaexis. Thanks for your response. So the assumption is that occupied territories will inevitably be inhabited by Russian speakers? – Primium (talk) 21:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Not quite, the assumption is that this is the de facto official language there, so the documents issued there and local news would use the Russian name. The reason we include alternative names is to help the reader find more information about the topic should they want to do it.

Russian speakers live also outside of the occupied territories, actually before the Euromaidan it had the status of a regional language in most of Eastern and Southern Ukraine [1] (see Russian_language_in_Ukraine#Russian_language_in_Ukrainian_politics for more details). Alaexis_¿question? 07:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I was assuming it was determined by the local authorities, but I was confused about this case, because Russia's local authority is not recognized by many nations and certainly not by Ukraine or even necessarily the inhabitants. Thank you for the clarity and resources! – Primium (talk) 19:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Sloboda#Requested move 22 May 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sloboda#Requested move 22 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Historical background of the 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine

Historical background of the 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Rsk6400 (talk) 13:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Andriy or Andrii?

I've created an article for Andrii Hnatov. I notice that quite a few sources also transliterate his name as "Andriy Hnatov" (and I've also seen "Andriy Gnatov" and "Andrii Gnatov" used in several places). Which is correct? Or are there multiple different transliteration systems that are equally valid? — The Anome (talk) 12:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

There is a government created [[2]] page to check for correct spelling. Correct spelling is Andrii Hnatov. Ceriy (talk) 12:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

War crimes in the Russian invasion of Ukraine has an RfC

War crimes in the Russian invasion of Ukraine has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. JDiala (talk) 21:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Can anyone help with cites for “did you know” for Vadym Sukharevsky?

Hello,

I recently used https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_translation_tool to translate this article into English. As I am a native English speaker I can probably correct the tool’s mistakes myself. I have submitted the article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Vadym_Sukharevsky

The cite for his family details, but it is a long video without translation. I think that on the English article it would be easier for those, like myself, who don’t know any Ukrainian language if there was a written cite. Do you have one by any chance?

Also could anyone check the other cites and if you have time expand the article with the new content recently added to https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%83%D1%85%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%92%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC_%D0%9E%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 Chidgk1 (talk) 06:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

I can confirm that the video says that (around 3:30). It's not controversial information so I don't see problems with using it as a source. Alaexis_¿question? 19:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Historical background of the Russo-Ukrainian War (2nd nomination)

There is currently a deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Historical background of the Russo-Ukrainian War (2nd nomination). Rsk6400 (talk) 08:50, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Sloboda#Requested move 24 August 2024

to disambig. --Altenmann >talk 23:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Women in Green's October 2024 edit-a-thon

Hello WikiProject Ukraine:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) 12:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata map problem in page

I noticed that the wikimedia commons page for the page Pervomaisk has a problem with its map, where the coordinate point is right, but the outline is way off. I've tried to look in the wikidata page but found nothing problematic. It would be great to learn more about how to fix this kinds of issues, thanks! TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 22:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Nevermind, I figured it out TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 22:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)