Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Science Fiction/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Discussion Forum

I have created a discussion forum page to discuss policy question within the project, to distinguish such from wikicode/content issues for this single page. Avt tor 22:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

I have moved the previous topics, all of which were policy issues, to the discussion forum. Avt tor 22:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

This doesn't seem like the standard usage, based on the WikiProjects with which I've dealt before (Physics, for example), but OK. Also, because the discussion forum lives at Wikipedia:WikiProject Science Fiction/Discussion Forum and not the corresponding Talk page, the "Post a comment" link does not work in the expected manner. Anville 21:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I've seen it done both ways. The more established projects usually have one or more discussion pages. There is a difference between project discussions, about policy on other groups of pages, and just fixing up a particular page. It makes more sense to me to split things up, (i.e. it confused me to combine things), but it's up to the (mainly silent) majority. Avt tor 23:20, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I suppose I'm just used to WikiProjects where the content of the project page is basically set (or at least the format solidly determined) and most of the questions have to do with articles in the project domain. But hey, whatever works! Anville 00:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

I have moved the "science fiction studies" discussion to the project discussion page. Avt tor 18:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Art

I think we should have an article on science fiction cover art or possibly science fiction art (instead of the surrent redirect to a list). There are a number of books and collections of cover art, the form itself is distinct from other genrees, and includes influences on SF film design. There are a number of artists whose work is actively collected, such as Chris Foss; others such as Carlo Rambaldi could do with a serious expansion. A generic art article would pull in H. R. Giger, who is obviously very influential through the cultural impact of Alien. What do people think? Guy (Help!) 12:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Sub-project: Hugo and Nebula Award Winners

I would like to suggest a sub-project for this WikiProject, basically another WikiProject that is part of the larger WikiProject Science Fiction (I've seen this done before with things like WikiProject Novels).

The Project I would like to propose - and I fully intend to participate heavily, believe me - is one to increase and improve our coverage of authors and stories that have won the Hugo or Nebula Awards, two of the most notable and necognized and (especially in the case of the Hugos) prestigious awards in the SF/fantasy community and industry. I've done a search, and did not turn anything up; apparently, there's never been a WP covering either Hugo winners OR Nebula winners. The proposed project would be titled WikiProject Hugo and Nebula Award Winners.

I plan to create a page for the WP, but don't know either of the following:

• 1.)How to list it as a sub-project of this one.
• 2.)How to create the "This article is part of WikiProject Hugo and Nebula Award Winners..." template for the talk page.

Any help would be much appreciated! ^_^ Runa27 00:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

This is a fairly small WikiProject... it may not be productive to create a separate project just for Hugo and Nebula awards, especially because the editors who are interested in that will almost totally overlap with WP:SF participants. In my opinion, it would be best to take whatever editing projects will require collaboration, and discuss them here (and add the project banner to whatever articles don't have it already). Very narrow WikiProjects often go inactive very quickly.--ragesoss 00:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

You misunderstand; this would not be a "seperate" project. It would be a sub-project, PART of this one. Though maybe it is more common to refer to these as "task forces" or something? There's one for short stories under WikiProject Novels, I think. As for "small", I'm not sure you really have an idea how few Hugo and Nebula winning stories and authors (especially the former) are actually covered here. The Hugos in particular have been going since the 1940s, and most of the stories which have won one do not seem to have coverage, or are only stubs. Also, the Nebulas and Hugos both are being still awarded, meaning dozens of new articles per year to keep up; it's a bigger project than you might think! ;)

Also, I suppose opening it up to "Science Fiction Awards" instead of just Hugos and Nebulas (which would also cover at least the Saturn Awards, as well as a few other international SF awards, and probably at least one award at Sundance - best Science-based film or something like that, I forget exactly what they call it) would expand it considerably as well. It's just that I figured it would be a good idea to start with the Hugos and Nebulas, since they seem to be less-covered, and it's easy to argue that a story that wins a Hugo or Nebula is notable just on that alone, because of how notable the awards themselves are. Also, many authors who have won one or both awards have only stub or Start class articles, even if they're really notable (just look at Robert Silverberg, for instance), and this is in large part what I was trying to fix, along with covering the most notable stories in SF literature, many of which haven't gotten good coverage on WP yet. Runa27 21:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

By small, I mean in terms of editors, not articles. This project itself is small, so I don't see an even smaller subgroup as likely to be productive. That said, it's no big deal one way or the other. If you're that gung-ho about it, go for it.--ragesoss 23:57, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Change sub-project idea to more general "Science Fiction Award Winners Task Force?"

Seeing as there is a whole category for "Science fiction awards", and this project's narrowness has been brought up as food for thought (although, considering Firefly has its own WikiProject, I'm not sure this is really, comparitively speaking, what I'd call "narrow" in focus :P), how about just a sub-project or task force to cover winners of prominent SF awards including the Hugos and Nebulas? Looking at the category on WP for SF awards, that would considerably broaden the subproject's focus. Runa27 23:38, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

The further you go down that road the deeper a pit you dig for yourself and your collaborators. (I've been trying to do something for Hugo-winning fanzines and fan-editors when I can). When you start taking in the Tiptrees and whatever the libertarians call their SF award and the two awards the Carl Brandon Society gives... and... and... and.... The mind boggles (even the slannish, fannish mind). --Orange Mike 23:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Hmm. True. Really, the Nebulas and Hugos are probably enough, especially with the backlog of uncovered or barely-covered stories and authors (besides, I'm not as interested in the Saturn Awards or Sundance), and the fact that they're still being awarded. I think in the next few days (or so; I have work and classes, so I don't know how quickly I can get it set up) I'll just start it (as Hugo and Nebula-centered), and see where it goes from there. I still haven't got an answer on how to mark it as a subproject or create the "WikiProject [insert name here]" type talk page template thing though. Is there a specific page somewhere that addresses this? I've never been able to find it... In any case, I went ahead and started the project page, though I don't think it's 100% "proper format" yet. :P Plus, there's the matter of the template and such.Runa27 23:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm relatively new at Wikipedia, but i'd going to give this a shot. I'm starting with the Hugo winning Novellas which have no page... and we'll see where it goes.--JW Bjerk (talk) 17:55, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Todo for those interested in award sub-project - Want to help?

1. Nebula and Hugo awards are obviously the biggest names around. As such, I think it warranted to make special note when winners and nominees for the one are also winners of the other award. I've correlated and marked all the Best Novel recipients (See: Hugo Award for Best Novel & Hugo Award for Best Novel), but the novellas, short stories, etc have yet to be done.
2. All or most of the Nebula Best Novel winners have a substituted succession infobox at the bottom that links 'em to the next and prior winner. That's going to be a bear to maintain, so I created a template with the substituted code at Template:Nebula/Best Novel. Now we need to go through and replace the substituted template with the maintainable one. This has been done for only the two most recent reward recipients.
3. Only two of the Hugo Best Novel award winners are marked with their new template: Template:Hugo/Best Novel, and we're starting from scratch on those.

Many thanks for any help rendered. MrZaius^talk 13:47, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Can someone explain to a wikipedia noob how to use this template?--JW Bjerk (talk) 07:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Help with links

Hi there. I created a page for the movie "The Man From Planet X" (which can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_from_Planet_X) but it's not showing up on search pages etc. Anyone able to help? Callum J. Stewart 10:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

At Special:Whatlinkshere/The_Man_from_Planet_X, you can see that four pages already link there, although only two are in normal article namespace. Wouldn't hurt to add mention of it and links to it from any actors, screenwriters, or directors that made the film & already have articles of their own. Even as it stands, however, it'll show up on google et al in a couple of days/weeks/months. MrZaius^talk 14:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

My bad. Thanks, Mr. Zaius. "The human edits Wikipedia like an ape!" "Yeah, well, human see human do..." Callum J. Stewart 14:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Australian Science Fiction

Am working on the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Australian_literature focusing on Australian Science Fiction & Fantasy, so have joined here to try and improve the links, tags, info boxes and categories that are related to this Project for such articles as Authors, Novels, Awards & Conventions etc. Boylo 02:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Cyberpunk

Cyberpunk has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. --P4k 01:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

And Isaac Asimov has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:13, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution Procedure REQUEST FOR COMMENT for article "The Rocky Horror Picture Show"

As per Wikipedia procedure for dispute resolution I am asking any and all members of this project to add input on a dispute over deletion of Taglines for this film, which was added to the National Film Registry in 2005. The original tagline "A Different Set of Jaws" is also listed as one of the most memorable taglines in history along with others. I also have at least one other reference source, an article on "The Rocky Horror Picture Show as Cultural Performance" with mention on the cultural impact of the tagline "Don't Dream It, Be It." Input is needed to resolve a current "Edit War" where an Editor keeps deleting without adding a better reason than he "Does not believe they are notable" with no further reference to back up the assertion. Thank you. --Amadscientist 23:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Looking for a book

This one has an alien species which "seeds" our planet with its plant/animal life. The US army sent in scientists to stop this invasion and that one of the lifeforms resembles a small human the size of an ant. The scientists predicted that the aliens are terraforrming Earth with their wildlife/plantlife before actually "conquering" our planet. Please help--SGCommand (talk • contribs) 16:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry, I found the book now--SGCommand (talk • contribs) 12:30, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Request feedback on guidelines

I would like to have the feedback of active wikiproject members on the following. Wikipedia has a number of guidelines on articles about fiction, predominantly WP:FICT and WP:WAF. These guidelines have been rewritten some time ago, but this appears to have been done without substantial input from editors who write about fiction.

Guidelines on Wikipedia are supposed to be a description of common practice. At present, however, these guidelines call for the removal of most material that does not include real-world information, which could be read as to include most articles about fictional characters, locations and concepts, such as those from science fiction books and series.

This does not reflect actual practice, because Wikipedia has thousands of such articles. Now there's no need for alarm, because to my knowledge, nobody is actually deleting any of this. However, it would be prudent to reword and update the aforementioned guidelines to accurately reflect how, and on which aspects, articles on fiction are written.

Please feel free to update the guidelines as needed, or direct your feedback to their respective talk pages. >Radiant< 10:44, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace

Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Greg Jones II 22:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Attack on SF-fandom-related articles

User:GlassFET has tagged articles on a number of SF cons, TAFF winners, fanzines, etc. as not notable; indeed, his edit note on the article for ATom explicitly says that fans are inherently not notable. Be warned, and monitor any articles about fandom and fanzines that you don't want to see deleted. --Orange Mike 01:19, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Beyond Fantasy Fiction featured article candidate

Not sure if this is the right place to post this, but I've nominated Beyond Fantasy Fiction for featured article status; the nomination is here. If you are interested in reviewing the article, please take a look at it (and of course read the instructions on how to review, which are at the top of the candidates page). I'm not just looking for people to support it -- useful critical comments would be great.

I plan to nominate a couple more magazine articles over the next month or two, so if this isn't the right place to post this note, let me know where would be a good place to notify other sf-focused editors. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk) 22:26, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

RfC

Hey everyone, there is a Request for Comment going on for the sci fi film Slither (2006 film). If anyone is able, please weigh in.--Cúchullain ^t/c 07:51, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Why? It's a bad film, the issue is mostly resolved already, and I joined this project to talk about science fiction, not crap movies and "sci fi"! --Orange Mike 15:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Whether it's a bad film or not (it's not) is irrelevant. Doczilla 22:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Good for you, but the film is within the scope of this project. I notified all the relevant projects. If you don't want to contribute, don't.--Cúchullain ^t/c 20:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

The Journal Entries -- SF Erotica

(Sorry if this is the wrong place: I couldn't tell if the forum was still monitored.) I'm trying to find reliable sources to back up the notability of Elf Sternberg, who's undergoing a second AfD at the moment. Since he writes SF Erotica (and pretty darned well, IMHO) and publishes only on the web, WP:RSs are thin on the ground. If you can suggest any places to look that the article hasn't already identified, I'd be quite grateful. Thanks.--SarekOfVulcan 20:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Hugo and Nebula Award Winners

It was brought up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hugo and Nebula Award Winners that that relatively inactive WP might be merged into this one and thereby made somewhat more effective, eliminating considerable overlap in templates, category maintenance, etc. Thoughts? Might have been better thought out as a workgroup within this WP than not. Regardless, anyone interested in helping? Got a fair bit of template populating left to do, as well, for the award winning novels. MrZaius^talk 16:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Merge the inactive project. Doczilla 22:20, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Sandworm (Dune) needs cites

The article Sandworm (Dune) has been tagged as "This article does not cite any references or sources" since April 2007. -- 201.19.77.39 11:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Speculative fiction workshop template

Hello. I created a template for workshops and writing circles that specialize in science fiction and fantasy here. It looks like that falls into this project's purview. Does this belong here, or am I crazy? --GoodDamon 17:18, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

The term speculative fiction is an umbrella that covers science fiction, fantasy, and more, as you must know, so it's certainly relevant. Doczilla 22:20, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Dyson Sphere GA push

I recently nominated Dyson Sphere for GA status, and it was failed; however, it's close, and with some help we can get it there. In particular, the reviewers left suggestions on a few specific issues:

1. An infobox would be nice; I don't know which one would be most appropriate, but someone here might.
2. Needs additional copyediting (esp. per weasel words, redundancies)
3. Needs additional sources

Thanks for your help. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 18:06, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Articles needing rescue

There was just a barely-avoided AFD on Pregnancy in science fiction. The article is in bad shape -- just a terribly-sourced bibliography of works relating in some way to fertility, infertility, reproduction, pregnancy. I've proposed some changes on Talk:Pregnancy in science fiction, and am soliciting here for other folks to come help out on that.

It also makes me think that we need in the project section a "rescue section" for articles that are meritorious in concept but so bad they are at-risk of deletion or other problems. Thoughts? --17:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Photos of L. Ron Hubbard?

I figured the members of this project might be the best people to know if there are any public domain photos of L. Ron Hubbard out there. So far, the only photos any of us can find are ones which are under the copyright of the Church of Scientology, and we would all prefer to use public domain photos wherever possible. If any of the members of this project know of any such photos, I would be very grateful to be informed of how to get them. Thank you. John Carter 14:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Best place to ask would be in some of the science fiction fan Usenet newsgroups, mailing lists, etc. All Knowledge Is Contained In Fanzines!--Orange Mike 15:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

redundant categories

The categories Category:Science fiction short story collections by Harlan Ellison and Category:Fantasy short story collections by Harlan Ellison only had a few items in them so I moved them to more general Category:Short story collections by Harlan Ellison (which is in no danger of overpopulation as he appears to be putting out less than a book a decade these days.) If anyone objects or would rather have everything at SF short story collections then please discuss. Otherwise I plan on taking the two categories to CfD in a couple of weeks. Sbacle 18:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Please do; the distinction was silly anyway. --Orange Mike 19:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Have at it. Doczilla 22:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion: Bootstrapping (science fiction)

Bootstrapping (science fiction) (via WP:PROD) currently a bit more than a dictionary definition

--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 11:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

I support the deletion. --Orange Mike 13:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Cascade Point

On Timothy Zahn's page, he supposedly won a Hugo award in 1984 for his novella Cascade Point, but there is no article in it. Is this where I request an article be creeated? Heavy Breather (talk) 05:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

You can certainly request an article, but there's no reason for you not to create it yourself. Just click on the link in your post above and start typing. It would be best to give some reasons in the article why an article about that novella is notable, such as the award.

You might also consider simply expanding the material on Zahn's page to cover the novella in more detail. There's no necessity to have a separate article if the material can be adequately covered in a parent article. Mike Christie (talk) 12:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

The Cornelius Quartet by Michael Moorcock up for deletion

Someone's got it in for Jerry, Catherine and Una. The discussion is here [1] Nick mallory (talk) 09:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Classification of Stories

Is there a guideline for classifying stories? For example, the Charles Stross series, "The Merchant Princes" is listed as being fantasy, but after reading the fourth book, there is not one element in the series that would qualify it for being fantasy. There are no fantastical creates. There is no magical or occult activity of any kind. All of the parallel universes involved appear to have the same physical laws. The process of world-walking now appears to have a scientific basis. So how, exactly is it fantasy? Dfmclean (talk) 13:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

PROD of The Excalibur Alternative

The Excalibur Alternative has been PRODded. I've removed the PROD, as I believe the article can be improved, and notability asserted. It will probably go to AFD instead. I've never worked on novel or SF pages before, so any assistance in improving the page would be appreciated. If notabilty can't be asserted by outside sources, then I have no problem with it being deleted. Thanks. - BillCJ (talk) 01:39, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

I found and added a review by Publishers Weekly. I'm looking for more. --Kweeket ^Talk 02:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Futuristic clothing

Would anyone be interested in improving my stub article for futuristic clothing? It's pretty poor at the moment, but I feel that "futuristic" clothing is a notable subject, even for its status as a retro-futurist cliche alone, that might well eventually make a good sub-section within a wider clothing in science fiction article. -- The Anome (talk) 10:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

What is a reliable source for a work of fiction?

Some SF articles, about a fictional character for instance, have a request for references or sources. How to deal with this? If a character only is mentioned in a single book or television show, that is all the sources you need, I suppose? But how can you link to that as a source? Calamarain (talk) 08:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

For a character in a book, cite page number in the edition you reference, just like any other book. There is no obligation to provide an online source for a citation. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Centralized TV Episode Discussion

Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [2]. Even if you have not, other opinions are needed because this issue is affecting all TV episodes in Wikipedia. --Maniwar (talk) 19:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Russian science fiction

Or Russian fantasy and science fiction. I would like to request this article. The existence of this rich genre is barely mentioned in Russian literature; the world Russia is not mentioned in either Science fiction or Fantasy articles, which just show enormous gaps/biases in their coverage. Note categories: Category:Russian science fiction and Category:Soviet science fiction - they are in dire need of a parent article; Social_science_fiction#The_genre_in_the_Eastern_Bloc contains some useful material. Thanks, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 21:11, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

If there are some articles on this topic on the Russian-language wiki (or perhaps antoher language), then we might be able to have them translated here as a start. - BillCJ (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I have begun, though it can take months to complete it even cursorily.--Ameshavkin (talk) 14:10, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Stepping back in time

The Academic Journals wikiproject is collaborating on Electrical Experimenter this week, and it would be good if some domain experts and enthusiasts could either assist or simply mention factoids on the talk page. If anyone has physical copies of this magazine that are in the public domain, it would be great if you could scan a few pages, upload them to Commons at commons:Category:Electrical Experimenter, and note the availability on our "Transcription" page. Cheers, John Vandenberg (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 10:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Category: Speculative fiction novels by writers of color

Help! I created this category as a newbie just because it was glaringly clear that this needed to be created. I didn't know about this project and its guidelines. I'm still trying to learn what is going on here. Anywho, I think that maybe this category should to be changed to "Science fiction by writers of color" since it seems that you are using "Science fiction" as an umbrella term to include "Speculative fiction". (And also "Walter Mosley's Futureland should be here, but because it is a collection of short stories it is being left out.) I don't know how to do that without going into every book. Is there a better way to do this? --Booksellergirl (talk) 21:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Also the same needs to be done to "Speculative fiction writers of color". I think it should be "Science fiction writers of color" --Booksellergirl (talk) 21:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

One option would be to nominate them for renaming at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. I've never done this myself but there are instructions on the page so you should be able to do it. Otherwise you might ask on the talk page there and someone with experience in category renaming should stop by and help you. Best of luck. Stardust8212 20:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll give it a try -Booksellergirl (talk) 14:11, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Science Fiction Television

Hello all. I recently obtained the book Science Fiction Television([3]) from my University Library in order to work on some SciFi related articles. I just thought I'd let the members of this wikiproject know that I'd be willing to scan pages out of the book for use in improving relevant Wikipedia articles so please let me know if you would like me to look up what the book has on your favorite SF TV show, the book covers through 2004. There is a limited preview of the book available on Google Books([4]) but not every page is viewable so if you already know what pages you want then let me know. I have the book until May 20th. Stardust8212 23:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

PROD

User:Orangemike marked an article I created with a PROD tag. The article is Psychic probe, and I agree that as is, it could be deleted. Does anyone have a last minute bit of encyclopedic knowledge to save the article? —ScouterSig 15:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

A thought about how to better deal with some fictional articles

Please see here.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

FAR

Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Ultra! 21:16, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Dune (novel)

This article is up for GA, but we are having trouble finding review material. Help is needed. Wrad (talk) 20:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Call for Help with Primer (film)

Hello. I'm quite new to this, so apologies if I'm posting on the wrong page. I've updated the article for the film Primer, but could use a second opinion. I think the article is reasonably well written, but could use some extra info and could possibly be restructured. Any input would be much appreciated. I've also posted this on the films project page. JMalky (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Lists of predictions

Is there anywhere an article or series of articles listing various predictions about the future in SF literature, perhaps with a comparison with what actually happened? If not, perhaps it would be useful to create one.

I was prompted to think of this having read a description of something like television in H G Wells' The Sleeper Awakes. --rossb (talk) 22:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Fancy something different?

Hi everybody, I've written an article called Introduction to genetics, which tries to explain the important concepts in DNA, genes and so on in an absolutely non-technical way. I was wondering if any people with no background in science would have time to go through this article and find the places where it isn't quite clear enough or fails to explain things properly. Comments on its talkpage please. Tim Vickers (talk) 20:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Notice Board page and Science Fiction Portal

I have just recently joined this project as I've been reading science fiction since I was ten, and thought it was about time I started contributing. I canna seem to find a place which lists the main todo' lists. The todo list on the main page is virtually useless. So i'm planning to create a notice board page, if notbody has any problems/objects. Also there is no portal for science fiction. There should be though. When you search for the portal for science fiction, the closest you get is a speculative fiction, and when you click on Science Fiction, you get a category list. Come on, we are the guys/girls who read and imagine what the future is going to be, so surely we can do better than than. So what I plan to do,

• Create a notice board for Science Fiction similar to this in design, so we can have a place to put in a full todo list.
• Start a Science Fiction portal page, say in a couple of months, so we can have it list in here eventually where is should be.

scope_creep (talk) 00:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

By all means, go for it. One of the first big projects I did on Wikipedia was to totally revamp a portal; it's a rewarding project, and one that you can dive right into. I would start with the portal, since maintaining a noticeboard can be frustrating if there isn't much reaction to it (which might be the case with a low-activity project such as this).

Technological singularity GA Sweeps Review: On Hold

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria and I'm specifically going over all of the "Culture and Society" articles. I have reviewed Technological singularity and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have left this message at this WikiProject's talk page so that any interested members can assist in helping the article keep its GA status. In reviewing the article, I have found there are a few issues that may need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left messages on the talk pages of the main contributors of the article along with another WikiProject. Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix if multiple editors assist in the workload. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 05:34, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Beam me in, Scotty

Are there no dedicated author/writer & fiction Projects? Trekphiler (talk) 18:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Articles flagged for cleanup

Currently, 528 of the articles assigned to this project, or 34.8%, are flagged for cleanup of some sort. (Data as of 18 June 2008.) Are you interested in finding out more? I am offering to generate cleanup to-do lists on a project or work group level. See User:B. Wolterding/Cleanup listings for details. Subsribing is easy - just add a template to your project page. If you want to respond to this canned message, please do so at my user talk page. --B. Wolterding (talk) 18:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

• The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
• The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
• A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 20:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

The category for C-class science fcition articles exists, but it is not being auto-populated when i rate articles as C. They go to "unassessed" instead. How can this be fixed?Yobmod (talk) 21:03, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

A discussion

An important discussion on " Should WikiProjects get prior approval of other WikiProjects (Descendant or Related or any ) to tag articles that overlaps their scope ? " is open here . We welcome you to participate and give your valuable opinions. -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - , member of WikiProject Council. 14:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposal for Category:Science fiction films

As this category has grown to a significant number of entries (gaining a {{catdiffuse}} template), I'd like to propose that it be subdivided into Category:Science fiction films by year (as is done, for example, under Category:Films). This would also aid in the maintenance of the List of science fiction films pages. (Alternatively, it could just be sub-divided by decade, per Category:Science fiction films by decade.) A year- or decade-based sub-division would be much easier to accomplish than, say, dividing by sub-genres, which would be subject to much interpretation. Any thoughts? Thank you.—RJH (talk) 17:34, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, this WP seems to have a lot of posters but very few readers. Might have to try another approach.—RJH (talk) 22:00, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I really meant to reply but I forgot. I think dividing by years sounds good, I don't know how big the categories wuld be if you divided by decade but I think that would be OK as well. Stardust8212 22:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I asked over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films and they ended up just removing the catdiffuse template. On a related note, it sounds like the Horror films category has already been subdivided by decade.—RJH (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Franchise naming convention discussion at WikiProject Media franchises

Dear WikiProject Science Fiction participants...WikiProject Media franchises is currently discussing a naming convention for franchise articles. Since this may affect one or more articles in your project, we would like to get the opinions of all related projects before implimenting any sweeping changes. Please come and help us decide. Thanks! LA (T) @ 22:18, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

PROD of Off Armageddon Reef

Off Armageddon Reef has been PRODded (after being redirected). I've removed the PROD, as I believe the article can be improved, and notability asserted. It will probably go to AFD instead. I've not worked on novel or SF pages before, so any assistance in improving the page would be appreciated. If notabilty can't be asserted by outside sources, then I have no problem with it being deleted. Thanks. - BillCJ (talk) 23:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Death ray needs your help

Death ray is still IMHO surprisingly stubby. Anybody care to improve? (Or possibly merge with some other article - I haven't checked.) -- 201.17.36.246 (talk) 18:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Science fiction

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:27, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Category: "Year" in science fiction

I'm pondering the prospect of starting a new category: "Year" in science fiction; eg "1999 in science fiction".

I'm aware that the category "Year in literature" exists but I think that the sf component could get lost in the mix. We currently have the following categories which are sub-categories of literature and related to sf: awards, books, comics, film and literature. Which covers most of the field but not all.

I was thinking about the following sub-headings per page:

• Events
• Books
• Short Fiction
• Films
• Non-Fiction
• Births
• Deaths
• Awards
• Conventions

though not necessarily in that order, and not necessarily restricted to that list. Any thoughts? --Perry Middlemiss (talk) 06:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

I've never found the categories terribly useful, myself, but I do think it's a good idea. Am I right it would branch to/from the year generally? I'm thinking in comparative terms: could it be used to look for "all events in 1999", then specialize to "1999 SF"? (I presume so.) I'd call that useful (even if I didn't necessarily use it myself...) TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 12:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Not sure I follow that exactly. The "1999 in sf" page would link to the "1999 in literature" page and thence to the "1999" page. Was that what you were thinking of? --Perry Middlemiss (talk) 12:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

L. Ron Hubbard good article reassessment

L. Ron Hubbard has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. Cirt (talk) 09:38, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Peer review, A class

Is there any procedure set up here for doing project peer reviews, or A-class assessments (which need 2 reviewers from the project)? I know other projects to both of these, but couldn't find anything here. Thanks in advance 09:27, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Participant list

In a way these are general wiki questions about participant lists, but it applies here.

1. Seems like the participant list is more useful maintained in alpha order than order of joining. Also, for this project, we actually list date joined anyhow.

2. I like it when the userboxes put you into the list automatically.

3. I don't understand the difference between the user list on this page and the one that is generated automatically.

TCO (talk) 20:13, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Featured lists

If people have time, could they jump over to featured list candidates and review my 3 lists of science fiction award winners? They have no opposes, but need 4 supports to pass, even if they are perfect. here and here and here. (Link to review page through talk)

I also have 2 more to do for the gaylactic spectrum award, then will try for a featured topic on that. I did this first as it is one of the shortest to make (only 10 years old). Now i have the formatting down, if people are interested in collaborating to make featured topics for major awards (Hugo, nebula, WFA etc), or even other minor ones (Tiptree) that would be great. Let me know! The lists are simple but boring to make, then just need a GA for the actual award. Will take me forever alone!Yobmod (talk) 10:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Articles up for deletion

Heidi Wyss and her book Gormglaith (novel) are up for deletion. I confess I'm only aware of them because of wikidrama, but does anyone here know of coverage in the SF press that would legitimate these articles?--Peter cohen (talk) 10:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Welll I checked but I couldn't find anything authoritative. If she publishes more works, perhaps she'll become notable and we can add her back in.—RJH (talk) 22:57, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks.--Peter cohen (talk) 23:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Jonbar Hinge

Does anyone know of any good sources to flush out this article? Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Can I get some help watching this page? People have been putting some bizarre stuff on here including saying the author whose book created the term time traveled in his mind to get the idea from a Hindu god. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 00:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Done. Fascinating page, too. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 01:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, I have been putting a lot of work into since I first noticed it. Then it was a mess. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 01:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Host Planet Earth

Does anyone know further details of this BBC radio series broadcast in six half hour episodes in the mid sixties? It details a strange malady from space affecting life on earth and the plight of british astronauts, potentially stranded in space. Nick mallory (talk) 10:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm A GA, not a bricklayer

James T Kirk should porbably be re-evaluated, as its been spiffied up a lot over the past month or so. A peer review was initiated yesterday, and all are welcome to add their comments there. I think its better than B, but what do you folk think? - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 16:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

James T. Kirk - is it A-Class?

Can someone re-assess James T. Kirk? I am unsure how to generate the template for review at the article level - there appears to be some conflicting info (and I would genuinely like to know how to do it if someone can take the time to show me how), and I don't want a mistake on my part to slow down the process and movement to GA and FA. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 18:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Spacecraft

Apparently, fictional spacecraft and a list of them are articles that need help. Should they be "tucked under" WP: Science Fiction? Colonel Marksman (talk) 08:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

FAR for Robert A. Heinlein

I have nominated Robert A. Heinlein for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. --Wehwalt (talk) 20:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

List of military science fiction works and authors

Can some people look at List of military science fiction works and authors ? It is a list of authors with two fictional universes thrown onto the list as well... Does that make the list overly indiscriminate? From the talk page, the intent is to include more fictional universes and other things onto the list. 76.66.196.229 (talk) 14:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

Someone requested a barnstar for this topic so I designed it.

		The Science Fiction Barnstar

The code for it is {{subst:SciFi Barnstar|message ~~~~}}. Thought you might want to know. Sophus Bie ^(talk) 01:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

I 've given oneout - first one from me ever i think.Yobmod (talk) 09:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Nifty! I'd place it on the project page, but since I'm not a member, I don't want to presume everyone likes it. (It comes in blue and purple, too; if the members of this project would like those better, I can switch them out on the template.) Sophus Bie ^(talk) 22:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I think it's great! Feel free to put it on the project page.--ragesoss (talk) 01:45, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay; I've stuck it under the Templates section. Sophus Bie ^(talk) 21:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Gaylactic Spectrum Awards

This has been up at featured list candidates for coming up to a week, and is maybe floundering for lack of reviews. Assuming i convince the 2 reviewers so far, it would still need more to be able to pass. It has a minimum of 10 days for reviewing (so 3 more), but extentions to the time require that it is being improved, any i've done all the improving i can find to do. I'm not expecting automatic supports, just any comments at all would be great. It's the last in a planned Featured topic, so would hopefully get a big jump in visibility if it passes (and be the first FT on a SF award, AFAIK).

Also, has anyone ever been to a Gaylaxicon? I'm starting to work it and Gaylactic Network up to GA, but anyone with any knowledge about either might notice things that i'm missing (unfortunately i'm on a wrong continent for first-hand experience), or even anyone with no knowledge that is interested in collaborating. Any newbies that want some GA/FL experience? Experienced editors to show me what i'm doing wrong? Anybody..?Yobmod (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Weapons in science fiction

I've rewritten Weapons in science fiction, which was up for AfD at the time. Although the AfD failed, the article could still do with substantial improvement. Would anyone be interested in improving it? -- The Anome (talk) 20:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Battle of Mars

Battle of Mars was prodded. I deprodded it because I think it should be merged into First Robotech War. 76.66.193.90 (talk) 06:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Robotech articles

There's a mass reorganization, merging, etc proposal up for Robotech at WT:ANIME 76.66.193.90 (talk) 11:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:29, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Blake's 7

Hi, I was just going through the alphabetical listing and Blake's 7 is not included, although there is an article on Blake's 7 in Wikipedia. Is there a reason for it's omission? Cheers Whipette —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whipette (talk • contribs) 11:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Because that's a listing of media franchises which have their own WikiProjects; and there isn't one for B7. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

The Year's Best Science Fiction: Ninth Annual Collection

I pulled this and a few others in the series out of the {{db-spam}} speedy deletion queue; I looked at User:Rastro's contribs, and he doesn't otherwise act like a publisher or promoter of sci-fi books, and I don't see a promotional tone in these articles. But the articles need work; what would you guys like to do with short-story collections that don't have any reviews or clear assertions of notability? - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 13:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

It's fair to say that all of the Dozois Year's Best (and anyone else's, really) can be presumed to be notable. If you have specific questions on other collxns, post 'em and I'll have a look.

Thanks for rescuing Dozois #9. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 04:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Merge proposal

There is currently a discussion taking place at Talk:Battlestar Galactica (reimagining)#Merge same topic, regarding the merger of Battlestar Galactica (reimagining) and Battlestar Galactica (2004 TV series) back into one article given that they are two separate articles covering the same topic.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 16:24, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Imperial Andermani Navy

Can someone look over Imperial Andermani Navy and Andermani Empire? Considering the disposition of the "mergist", not much was merged, even though that was the outcome of the deletion discussion for Imperial Andermani Navy. (The mergist was the deletion nominator, and made a comment that nothing needed to be merged, which resulted in another editor commenting that that person should not do the merge because of said opinion). 70.29.213.241 (talk) 06:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Honorverse_concepts_and_terminology

FYI. Ikip (talk) 16:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Bad source used for award information

A user recently went through a changed a lot of dates for Nebula Awards based on the website www.worldswithoutend.com. That website has incorrect information, listing, for instance, the year in which the Nebula awards are given as the award year, rather than the prior year, which is what the Nebula is awarded for (correctly, the Nebula Awards being given out in 2009 are referred to as the 2008 Nebulas). I've called it to the user's attention, but it should be noted that he changed numerous pages and used the erroneous source on numerous pages. Shsilver (talk) 01:44, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Here is a list of the user's modifications.—RJH (talk) 16:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Pat LoBrutto nominated for deletion

Pat LoBrutto has been proposed for deletion. I am having a hard time finding independent sources about Lobrutto to prove notability, but Lobrutto did win a World Fantasy Award for editing in 1986, and has since won at least one more for co-editing an anthology that one an award. Are WFA award winners automatically notable? I am not going to remove the deletion template as I am not sure that's always the cause, but I mention it here in case anyone has sources for Lobrutto or feels that the WFA makes him notable. Mike Christie (talk) 23:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Cally (Blake's 7)

Cally (Blake's 7) has been nominated for deletion. 76.66.202.139 (talk) 04:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

"Year in literature" linked years on Philip K. Dick

An editor is proposing that all "year in literature" links be stripped out of the article on Philip K. Dick. Ed Fitzgerald _{t / c} 04:48, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Io (Babylon 5)

Io (Babylon 5) has been nominated for deletion 70.29.210.174 (talk) 05:27, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Sarah Connor images

Two Sarah Connor images have been nominated for deletion...

• File:Connor, Sarah (TSCC).jpg
• File:Connor t2.jpg

70.29.212.226 (talk) 11:54, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Altair IV

Altair IV has been nominated for deletion. 70.29.208.69 (talk) 05:56, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Cfds related to Philip K Dick

There are 2 current PKD-related cfds here and here. Occuli (talk) 14:52, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

a whole lotta articles up for deletion

A whole lotta SF articles have been nominated for deletion at WP:AFD on the 16th and 17th. 76.66.192.91 (talk) 04:41, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Not really. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Images of book covers in book series articles

There is discussion on how best to use cover art to "significantly improve reader understanding" for book series, without going overboard on non-free content images, both at WT:NFC#Requesting_comment_about_galleries_of_book_covers_for_book_series_articles and at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 July 23, where a very large number of book covers has been nominated for deletion.

Please do pass this on to relevant associated WikiProjects and sub-projects whose members may be interested. Jheald (talk) 23:22, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Resistance (Terminator)

This article was prodded as it isn't based on reliable sources. I deprodded. Unless it can be sourced better the prodder will probably send it to Articles for Deletion. If anyone here can do some rewriting based on reliable sources it wouldn't go amiss. Fences&Windows 19:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

GA Reassessessment of Clare Winger Harris

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing and the lead which you can see at Talk:Clare Winger Harris/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:05, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

GA Reassessessment of Stanisław Lem

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Stanisław Lem/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:42, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Tagging

Any article about a SF book or character may be tagged on its talkpage with this WikiProject? Debresser (talk) 10:44, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I see this is not an active project page... Debresser (talk) 12:06, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

It's on the lower end of the activity range.—RJH (talk) 19:29, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

You could have at least try to answer my original question as well. :)) Debresser (talk) 22:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry; the answer is, yes. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:12, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Now, now, be polite. :) —RJH (talk) 16:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks you. (See I am polite?) Debresser (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Richard Blade (series)

A new editor has been working on Richard Blade (series) and is having some trouble. Perhaps someone can take a look at this article and get some references?--Blargh29 (talk) 06:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Somnium (Kepler)

I believe the book Somnium (Kepler) should be an important part of your project, as I have heard it referenced to as the 'first work of science fiction', but can't work out which cats, templates and importance, so just pointing you in its direction, cheers. L∴V 23:35, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

article copyedit and assessment request

Could somebody from the project please have a look at [[Space Gun {video game)]], firstly to check grammar and spelling, then to assess it's quality. AirRaidPatrol 84 (talk) 12:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

I've gotta go to work now, but I'll take care of this for ya this evening if no one else has. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 12:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Space Gun (video game)#Mid-October review ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Archiving

Inactive or not, 100 topics on a page is a little unwieldy and unwelcoming, so I've set up archiving with this edit to archive threads older than 14 days, with max size of 150k, leaving at least seven topics. Hope I got it right... ~ Amory (u • t • c) 03:33, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Human disguise

Input at this article's AfD would be helpful. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Battle Beyond the Stars plot help

I recently attempted to write a plot for the film Battle Beyond the Stars, as it only had a few sentences saying it was based on other films. I wrote it and it got reverted by a guy who basically said it was crap. I tried to re-write and correct it, and it got reverted. He hasn't responded to any my attempts to write, just reverted me. If anyone could check it out and tell me if I did something wrong with the plot section, I'd appreciate it before he just reverts it again. Mathewignash (talk) 14:27, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

I checked on the User talk:Drmies page and he did appear to respond reasonably to your concerns. Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)#Plot_summaries, the preference is to write a plot summary with a length that is in balance with the other sections. I usually interpret that as meaning 2-4 paragraphs of tight summary information, skipping the unnecessary details and just focusing on the main story.—RJH (talk) 17:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Alien invasions

I think that the category Category:Alien visitation films should be split with a subcategory, "Alien Invasion films", setting apart the movies about invasions and movies that merely feature aliens (like E.T.). Such a category would be also a subcategory of Category:Alien invasions (which the current one can not be). What do you think of the idea? MBelgrano (talk) 13:18, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

I suspect that category would include most of the films under "Alien visitation films", as an invasion provides more drama. But it makes sense to me, as long as there is a clear definition. For example, would you consider Alien invasion to just include those dealing with military conquest? Or would it include the Predator films?—RJH (talk) 17:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

FAR

• Wikipedia:Featured article review/Three Laws of Robotics/archive1

At WP:FAR YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (Invincibles finally at Featured topic candidates) 05:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

AFD for Amy Pond

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Pond. Cirt (talk) 21:06, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Sapphire & Steel

Any fans of this series out there? After mentioning this a year ago on the talk page, I noticed that the List of Sapphire & Steel television stories gives story titles when they never actually had any. I've come back to this now after viewing the currently released DVD which mentions both in its sleeve notes and on the bonus documentary that the stories never had titles. I believe the story name section should be changed, as it seems the titles given (although it does state they weren't official) will give the casual reader false information. Anybody agree or care?--Tuzapicabit (talk) 18:35, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Not a fan (tho I've heard of it), I'd say first, if it's explicit the "titles" are descriptive ("The Salt Vampire") rather than official, leave it; make it explicit if needed. Second, I do wonder if the scripts didn't have titles (they'd have to have, no?), even if they were never attached to the titles; if this couldn't be found somewhere; & if this couldn't be added, again making clear these were never aired titles (which I take to be your meaning of "official"). TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 08:56, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Largely immaterial now as someone has redirected the page now, which kind of solves it (although perhaps a little drastic). No the scripts never had titles as confirmed by both the writer and producer. The current DVD release lists them as Assignment 1, 2, 3 etc. which would probably the best way to list them. I will at some point reinstate the episode table into the main article, unless somebody else does it first.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 09:30, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

RFC on Amy Pond

Please see: Talk:Amy_Pond#RfC:_Is_Photo_in_Casting_and_initial_filming_section_relevant. Thank you for your time, Cirt (talk) 13:35, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

RfC: Image use in infobox

Please see Talk:Eleventh_Doctor#RfC:_Image_use_in_infobox. Thank you for your time, Cirt (talk) 08:36, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Enemy Mine

Can someone look at Enemy Mine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) ? Someone wants to roll Enemy Mine (film) onto it. I think it was improperly merged away, since someone merged it into a new anthology The Enemy Papers (2005), while this novella was published in 1980, and republished in longer novel form in the 80's; and it is a Hugo and Nebula award winner so should have sufficient notability to stand on its own. I don't think the anthology has sufficient notability to survive a deletion challenge. 76.66.197.17 (talk) 07:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Someone moved it to Enemy Mine (novella) and I've restored the article. 76.66.197.17 (talk) 07:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

I did the rearranging of the "Enemy Mine" articles in the sense that I moved the article you restored to its more specific Enemy Mine (novella) home. I have no opinion on the underlying dispute, other than that I think there are enough somewhat equally notable articles so that Enemy Mine itself needs to be a disambiguation page (or a redirect to Enemy Mine (disambiguation). I have no opinion on the underlying merge question. Shadowjams (talk) 07:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Need info

What's the show, where a family finds themselves trapped in a house surround by a solid grey wall. They turn out to be 'futuristic' dolls in their doll house (which was put in the stove, as an older brother's prank)? GoodDay (talk) 19:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Sounds like a Twilight Zone episode, somewhat like Miniature (The Twilight Zone).—RJH (talk) 18:39, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Review for Dalek

I have nominated Dalek for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.Cirt (talk) 22:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletions (October 2007)

Resolved

• The Nations of Crimson Skies (via WP:PROD on 7 October 2007) Deleted
• Eidelon (Farscape) (via WP:PROD on 7 October 2007) Kept
• Defence screen (Farscape) (via WP:PROD on 2 October 2007) Redirected→Energy shield
• Frag Cannon (via WP:PROD on 2 October 2007) Merged→Command Carrier
• Marauder (Farscape) (via WP:PROD on 1 October 2007) Redirected→Peacekeeper (Farscape)
• Templar (Andromeda) (via WP:PROD on 2 October 2007) Deleted
• The Greatest Sci-Fi Movies Never Made (via WP:PROD on 4 September 2007) Deleted
• Unrealized reality (via WP:PROD on 1 October 2007) Redirected→Farscape terminology
• Zelbinion (via WP:PROD on 1 October 2007) Redirected→Farscape terminology

Blade Runner

Blade Runner has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.

Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith

Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:38, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Frankenstein GAR notice

Frankenstein has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.

Portal:Speculative fiction

This portal has not been used for a while, but it could be useful to this project. Is anyone interested in helping me revive it? If you're interested, I'm going to be working on it here. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:49, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

I've made a logo for the portal now. Any thoughts on it? Go here to see it. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Since I have a good basic structure going, I've moved the sandbox version live. I'm still very interested in others helping out if you wish. "Many hands makes light work" and all that... :) ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Shared resources suggestion

There is a shared resources Wikipedia page, but it is not much used, probably because it is time consuming for editors to add their reference works to it. I've begun a listing of my own reference works that I think are of interest to other Wikipedians. The page is here; there is a section on science fiction, currently incomplete.

I'd like to suggest two things:

1. Anyone who is willing to use the sources at their disposal to assist other editors may wish to create a similar page.
2. We could then create a section on the main project page of links to editor's library pages, where those pages contain some sf references.

-- Mike Christie (talk) 01:40, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people

List of cleanup articles for your project

If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see: Cleanup listings A list of examples is here

Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages"

If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation page", contact me, User talk:Ikip

Watchlisting all unreferenced articles

If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip

Ikip 02:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Request for comment on Biographies of living people

Hello Wikiproject! Currently there is a discussion which will decide whether wikipedia will delete 49,000 articles about a living person without references, here:

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Since biographies of living people covers so many topics, nearly all wikiproject topics will be effected.

The two opposing positions which have the most support is:

1. supports the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, User:Jehochman
2. opposes the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, except in limited circumstances, User:Collect

Comments are welcome. Keep in mind that by default, editor's comments are hidden. Simply press edit next to the section to add your comment.

Please keep in mind that at this point, it seems that editors support deleting unreferenced BLP articles if they are not sourced, so your project may want to source these articles as soon as possible. See the next, message, which may help.

Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people

List of cleanup articles for your project

If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see: Cleanup listings A list of examples is here

Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages"

If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation page", contact me, User talk:Ikip

Watchlisting all unreferenced articles

If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip

Ikip 02:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

For those who find the rfc rather complex to navigate, User:Peter_cohen/BLP_RFC_stats lists those proposals that have had 50 or more support and/or oppose votes and contains an indication of voting trends. I intend to update on a roughly daily schedule.--Peter cohen (talk) 16:47, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Request for assistance in finding SF forums

There is a science fiction short story I am trying to track down and I was interested in finding an online forum for assistance. Does anyone have any suggestions?

The story was published a few decades ago, and concerns a group that builds a time machine that can retrieve someone from the future for a short period. They are discouraged to realize that the person they bring back from the future is unable to describe any of the technology that underpins the society of the future, so they learn almost nothing.

Thank you for any ideas you might have.--Filll (talk | wpc) 01:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Abe Books BookSleuth is a good place to start. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 10:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

There are a lot of us (members of fandom) at Project Wombat! http://www.project-wombat.org/ --Orange Mike | Talk 16:32, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

S. D. Perry

FYI, S. D. Perry has been prodded for deletion by someone. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 10:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Portal:Speculative fiction redux

So, anyone else willing to help out with this portal? It's a lot of work for one person to do. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Nope. I care about science fiction, so I hang here. I've encountered a few too many people who use "speculative fiction" to mean "like science fiction, but read by pretentious college types like myself and not associated with those trashy pulp magazines and vulgar non-academic fans and writers with no Ph.D. in Post-Derridan Deconstructionism; and if I call it 'speculative fiction' I can get it past my thesis committee". --Orange Mike | Talk 18:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, in this case it means "science fiction, fantasy, horror, alternate history, and the like", but said much more concisely.For a portal name, it's much better than trying to figure out a way to include all of that. :) ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Yeah types like User:Deafman, with whom Orangemike may be acquainted, and myself were some of those pretentious members of the Oxford University Speculative Fiction Group. But actually it meant that we could do both SF and Fantasy in one group.--Peter cohen (talk) 20:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, Peter; I've got class issues with some of what academia does when it gets its hands on SF, and I guess it shows, even though some of my best friends-I've-never-met, like Andy Sawyer, live there. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:33, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

I'll let you off just this once, Mike. ;-) --Peter cohen (talk) 22:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, I'm not snobby, so anyone interested in even just one part of it is welcome to help. I'm working on the anniversary entries right now. Please use the format as found on any of the dates which are completed in order keep consistency on all the dates. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:05, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

I'd be down to help where I can (added to watchlist). Most of the movies, books, tv articles I'm working on plots for fall into the genre anyway. I'm still new to the whole process and not totally versed in all of the editing guidelines, which is why I've stuck to plots and copy editing so far. But hit me up on my talk page; I'd be happy to figure out where and how I could help (fair warning, some seriously chunky plots on my to do list so my help will likely be minor-ish for now). Millahnna (mouse)talk 18:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, once we get all the different pieces in there, the only things which will require any seriously-regular upkeep are the "In the news" and "Did you know" sections (though the latter won't require as much time as the former). All the other parts are automated and will generally take care of themselves with only minor upkeep. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

How often should those sections be getting updated, generally speaking? Ont he former I'm assuming, as often as there is news to post. Did you know seems a little more potentially vague though. Millahnna (mouse)talk 21:02, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, "Did you know" is updated as often as a related "Did you know" item is available to add. The news section is the same way. I'm currently trying to fill in all the days of the year with something for each of them so the "On this day" feature will work. You're welcome to work on that, too, as that's the section which will take the most time to get going (366 days to fill). Please use the format as found on any of the dates which are completed (see the blue links on this page so keep them all consistent. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:03, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

How widely do you spread your nets? I had a dyk on Tornrak an opera which has elements that could count as either fantasy or horror. On my to create list is Dr Ox's Experiment which has a libretto after Verne, which fact will almost certainly be the DYK.

Actually do we want a category for science fiction opera? Does this project want such items as The Excursions of Mr. Brouček to the Moon and to the 15th Century and The Makropulos Affair (opera) labelled as under its purview? (Actually Karel Čapek's original play for the latter is in Category:Science fiction theatre, but this project doesn't have its banner on the talk page.--Peter cohen (talk) 22:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps Category:Science fiction theatrical productions until there are enough operas to decently fill it? This would include regular plays as well. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:52, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Peer review

I invite you to come participate in a peer review of Portal:Speculative fiction. You can see (and participate in) the discussion here. Thank you for your time. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

R. Giskard Reventlov

FYI R. Giskard Reventlov was prodded for deletion. 65.94.253.16 (talk) 05:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

RfC at Tannhauser Gate

A discussion requesting the input of this project is occurring at Talk:Tannhauser Gate#Keep or merge and redirect. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 21:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

The AfD consensus was keep. No doubt there is a good reason for ignoring it..... --Michael C. Price ^talk 21:56, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

That AfD is dated 31 July 2009. The RfC is current as of today. Viriditas (talk) 02:15, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Can anyone confirm this?

The death of John Eric Holmes has been reported, but of course we need a reliable source to confirm that. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 18:19, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

I couldn't find any evidence, so I reverted the change. Thanks.—RJH (talk) 08:08, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

I restored the change because I found what appeared to be the funeral home obit.—RJH (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation

All but five of the nominees in this category now have their own articles. Anybody want to help me fill the lacunae? --Orange Mike | Talk 17:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

• The Capture (slideshow)[5] was apparently just a humorous slideshow that was later published as the book The Capture Coloring Book. Unfortunately here isn't much in the way of sources to satisfy notability.
• Stub created: Hauser's Memory
• The Night of the Eagle already existed as Night of the Eagle.
• Stub created: Murder and the Android

—RJH (talk)

Category:Science fiction themes and Category:Science fiction concepts

FYI, these two categories have been proposed to be merged, see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_May_22

70.29.210.155 (talk) 04:40, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Portal:Speculative fiction nominated to be featured portal

Portal:Speculative fiction is now a Featured portal candidate. Please come participate in the discussion here. Thank you for your time. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 07:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

For anyone who is interested, Portal:Speculative fiction is now a featured portal! Thanks to everyone who participated and helped in any way. I really appreciate it. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 19:27, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Characters who change state during a series

Over at Donna Noble, we've having a spirited discussion over whether or not she should be listed as "Human" or some variant of "half-human-half-Timelord". First, we could use some more eyes over there on this dispute in particular -- especially since I'm not sure there are reliable statements out there as to her status after the metacrisis. Second, has there been a previous discussion on how to list characters who change a defining characteristic, like race, over the course of a series which we could review for guidance? Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Requests for assessment - cleaning the list of requests

I have started a conversation about cleaning up the list of Requests for Assessment over on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Science Fiction/Assessment. I would like to clean up the list and would encourage everybody to discuss this matter over there. Thanks. - Hydroxonium (talk | contribs) 17:40, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Three Laws of Robotics

Hi

Having had the article Three Laws of Robotics delisted from FA I am trying to start a little initiative to get it back up to FAC status.

Please can anyone who has a specific interest go to Work required and look at the problems listed and comment on any ideas they may have in the section Addressing the problems below it.

Any responses please place in the relevant section after the Proposed solution header

Thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 02:51, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Discussion at Novels that needs input

If anyone here gets a chance, please weight in at the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Novels#Category:American_novels, the discussion is kindof stalling and we could use some new thoughts. Sadads (talk) 16:35, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Verify Silverberg quote

For the article on Galaxy Science Fiction I'd like to cite this from Robert Silverberg: "[Pohl] agreed to buy any story I cared to send him—a guaranteed sale—provided I undertook to write it with all my heart, no quick-buck hackwork. If he wanted revisions, I would pledge to do one rewrite for him, after which he would be bound to buy the story without asking anything more of me. If I turned in a story he didn't like, he would buy it anyway, but that would be the end of the deal". According to this page it's on page 87 of his book Phases of the Moon. If anyone has a copy and can confirm the quote and page number, I'd be grateful if they could post a note here and supply the publisher and date. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk) 02:44, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Request for comment on Biographies of living people

Hello Wikiproject! Currently there is a discussion which will decide whether wikipedia will delete 49,000 articles about a living person without references, here:

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Since biographies of living people covers so many topics, nearly all wikiproject topics will be effected.

The two opposing positions which have the most support is:

1. supports the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, User:Jehochman
2. opposes the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, except in limited circumstances, User:Collect

Comments are welcome. Keep in mind that by default, editor's comments are hidden. Simply press edit next to the section to add your comment.

Please keep in mind that at this point, it seems that editors support deleting unreferenced article if they are not sourced, so your project may want to pursue the projects below.

Science fiction articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Science fiction articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of November, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:35, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

New article - Recursive science fiction

• Recursive science fiction

Thought WikiProject members might be interested. :) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 21:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Science fiction articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Science fiction articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Sunday, November 14th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of November, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

If you have already provided feedback, we deeply appreciate it. For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 16:36, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Three Laws of Robotics up for peer review

Hi

I have finished the work on the article and have put it for peer review. Wikipedia:Peer_review/Three_Laws_of_Robotics/archive1

Chaosdruid (talk) 23:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Template:Fringe

FYI, {{Fringe}} has been requested to be renamed. 76.66.194.212 (talk) 05:40, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots)

Requested move. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality improvement project - Slaves of Sleep by L. Ron Hubbard

I am going to try to work on a quality improvement project - Slaves of Sleep by L. Ron Hubbard. It'd be nice to see if there is enough source coverage to fully cover the topic for eventual improvement to GA quality. (Right now it'd simply be nice to flesh it out a bit more with additional WP:RS secondary sources.) Help would be appreciated - if you'd like to collaborate on this project and pitch in somehow, please post to Talk:Slaves of Sleep. Thank you for your time! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 22:20, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Three Laws of Robotics/GA1

A GA review of Three Laws of Robotics is taking place and has been put on hold for an initial seven days to allow work to take place to address concerns mainly around referencing and original research. SilkTork *^YES! 23:07, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Template:Fringe

{{Fringe}} has been requested to be renamed to match Fringe (TV series). 65.95.14.34 (talk) 12:02, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

CfD of Category:WikiProject_Science_Fiction_categories

Notice appears to have been lacking for Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_December_21#Category:WikiProject_Science_Fiction_categories. Please post your thoughts there. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:46, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:DefunctAmericanSFMagazines nominated for deletion

Template:DefunctAmericanSFMagazines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mike Christie (talk – library) 00:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Powered exoskeletons in fiction

Powered exoskeletons in fiction has been nominated for deletion. 64.229.103.232 (talk) 07:15, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Possibly the lead and the skinsuit section could be rescued, if they were properly cited. The remainder just appears to be trivia.—RJH (talk) 23:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Avatar usage under discussion again

See Talk:Avatar_(Hinduism)#Requested_move_2 where it is requested that the move done by 2010 move request be undone, moving the Hindu concept to primary in place of the disambiguation page. 64.229.101.183 (talk) 03:15, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers

There are no volunteer peer reviewers listed as specializing in science fiction. If anyone is interested in helping review science fiction-related articles, please add your name to Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers#Language and literature. Viriditas (talk) 08:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Input needed.

Please visit Talk:Aliens (film)#Merge to help decide what to do with the article Bishop (Aliens). Thank you. Cliff (talk) 22:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Stub type

Greetings! A stub template or category which you created has been nominated for renaming or deletion at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type most likely doesn't meet Wikipedia requirements for a stub type, through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! This message is boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature.

See discussion for

• Category:Honorverse stubs
• Category:Battlestar Galactica stubs
• Category:Transformers stubs

Dawynn (talk) 15:17, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

RFC Geoffrey A. Landis

There is an RFC on the use of the word notable in the lead of the above article at Talk:Geoffrey A. Landis#RFC. Comments welcome. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:32, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Source Code

The usage of Source Code is under discussion. It currently redirects to source code. The discussion is at Talk:Source Code (film) .

184.144.160.156 (talk) 04:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Android

The use of the pagename Android is under discussion, see Talk:Android_(operating_system)#Requested_move. 65.95.13.139 (talk) 02:41, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aldebaran in fiction

Also nominated Fomalhaut, Alpha Centauri, Sirius, Epsilon Eridani and several others. All opinions welcome. Thank you. ^walk victor falk ^talk 13:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Since the primary issue is the presence of "trivia", would it make sense to migrate the "Universe in fiction" content to a topic on WikiBooks? For example, there is a Conworld book on WikiBooks. When the book is ready, we can link back to it from the various associated wikipedia articles.—RJH (talk) 15:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Help requested for the Wikipedia: Wikiproject Battletech

Hello, I asking for assistance in creatinng templates for the Wikipedia: Wikiproject Battletech. I believe that I'm the most active member of this project and I have to skill in creating tmeplates. The Battletech project falls under this group also. As a very spacific project focused on this subject matter intrest from many users' is very little. As a subject closey related to Science fiction I'm asking for assitance due to I dont have all the nesceary skills for this. So those that would be willing I would be most gratefull for the help. FOr any furhter comments please them on the Projects disscusion page.Popa01 (talk) 03:04, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

B5

Interstellar Network News has been prodded for deletion. 184.144.163.181 (talk) 05:41, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Minbari Warrior Caste has been prodded for deletion. 184.144.163.181 (talk) 04:54, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Timeline of Asimov's Foundation Series

Timeline of Asimov's Foundation Series has been prodded for deletion. 184.144.163.181 (talk) 04:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Heinlein question

Nebula Science Fiction is currently at FAC. The article mentions that a Heinlein novel was going to be serialized in Nebula when the magazine suddenly ceased publication; an editor at the FAC has asked which novel this was. The source (John Clute's Science Fiction: The Illustrated Encyclopedia) doesn't specify. I've ordered a copy of Grumbles from the Grave, which might answer the question, but I thought someone in this WikiProject might know -- if so, please post a note here or at my talk page. Thanks -- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:49, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

British Library Editathon

Dear Science Fiction editors - Wikimedia UK invites you to take part in our British Library Editathon on 4th June. There is currently an exhibition at the British Library about the history of Science Fiction, covering everything from the very earliest sci-fi to material published in the 2000s. Part of the event is a guided tour of this exhibition, and if any sci-fi editors can make use of the BL's literally vast resources, please do come along. Any questions please ask here or on the WMUK wiki, or contact myself or User:Fæ.Best regards, The Land (talk) 10:49, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

merge discussion

The following merge discussion about what to do with the Timeline of Asimov's Foundation Series may be of interest to those in this Wikiproject: [6]. Hobit (talk) 04:12, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Earthsearch

While listening to a repeat of the above programme on R4E last night, I looked at our page on it and that on Follett's official website and noticed a resemblance. I've shoved up a Copyvio template for now. Anyone want to sort things? The article has not yet been tagged as falling under this project but obviously does.--Peter cohen (talk) 10:26, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

The only copyvio part was the story section, so that should have simply been removed (which I have now done). It appears to have been a copyvio since the first day (provided Follett's website has been around since before 2004, when this page was first created). ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 15:54, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. There were a couple of other sections that needed zapping too. I have now done so.--Peter cohen (talk) 18:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Question about sf magazine articles

See here for a question about sf magazine articles -- I'd be glad of any feedback. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:14, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Eurocon 2011

I have uploaded some photo from Eurocon 2011 in Stockholm (see commons:category:Eurocon 2011) that may be useful for the project. Best regards--Ankara (talk) 21:26, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Locus Award "nominations"

As I add reviews to pages on more recent sf novels, I'm noticing a number of statements that the novel was "nominated" for a Locus Award, typically referenced to this site [http://www.worldswithoutend.com/index.asp}, "Worlds Without End". It looks nicely organized and reliable, but, at least with regard to these awards, it's not reliable. The Locus Poll doesn't have "nominations," in the way that many other awards do (eg, finalists or final-round ballot listings); instead, any item that a reader votes for is considered "nominated." What "Worlds Without End" displayed as "nominees" are simply the top five (usually) finishers in the poll. As I run across these statements, I typically change the text to more precisely reflect what occurred (eg, "placed nth in the annual Locus Poll") and replace the link with a link to the pertinent author entry on the Locus awards page. I hope other editors will take similar steps, making the coverage more accurate/reliable. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:04, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

The Persistence of Vision

Oh, come on, is that the best we can do? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:55, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Strawpoll. How many want to make being on the bestseller's list proof of notability for a book?

Please come participate in the discussion and poll. Thank you. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 17:58, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Encyclopedia of Science Fiction by Clute and Nicholls

Can someone please check whether the following sentence is in the article on T. L. Sherred in that encyclopedia? "It is understood that the story was accepted for ASF in John W. CAMPBELL Jr's absence." Or to put it another way, is this a faithful copy of the S section, and if so, of what edition?

I asked yesterday at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request, but no answer yet. Sorry if anyone has seen it twice.

Thanks. —JerryFriedman (Talk) 02:53, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Never mind, answered (yes) at rasfw. —JerryFriedman (Talk) 05:27, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

The Adventures of Brisco County, Jr. GA Nomination

I have humbly nominated this page, about the science fiction western, for GA status, and would appreciate an interested editor beginning the review process. Cheers.AstroCog (talk) 22:15, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Asimov articles

Some of the articles for stories, especially short stories, written by Isaac Asimov, are in serious need of help. Whoever built them apparently didn't quite know what he/she was doing. No offense, they just seem to have been built using wrong formatting of headings, and they use raw HTML. I can't keep up with all of them, and I'm not exactly a veteran editor. If someone could help, I would greatly appreciate it. - Lord Vargonius (talk) 02:50, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Could you list a few examples of badly formatted articles? – Richard BB 15:49, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Ra.One

The film article, Ra.One, which also falls under the Science fiction genre, is in need of a quality and importance rating on it's talk page. I would be glad if somebody could do the needful. AnkitBhatt^{Talk to me!!}_LifEnjoy 10:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Request for Comment on Children of Dune

A few weeks ago I added a {{plot}} template to the Children of Dune article as I believed the plot summary was too long and complex. Yesterday I took a stab at cutting the plot down to size (though it probably still ended up as being too long). Another editor disagreed with my changes and reverted my edit. I would appreciate any wikiproject members who are familiar with the novel to review the plot as it stands as well as my edit to see if it's a good start as an article improvement. Thanks! Stile4aly (talk) 18:40, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

I've taken my machete to the synopsis, making it even more condensed and eliminating a lot of mechanics that wasn't essential to the basic plot. I'm sure it needs more work in spots. My basic rule is that a plot summary rarely needs to explain how something is done so long as it explains what is done. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:59, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for effort and support. I've made a few additional changes and look forward to continuing to improve the article. Stile4aly (talk) 00:24, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Terminator edits

someone might want to look over the edits made by 71.162.100.157 (talk · contribs) who has made massive changes to the various Terminator articles. 65.94.77.11 (talk) 06:22, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

New template Isfdb contents

I have just added {{Isfdb contents}} to display publication contents listings such as:

• Analog October 1967 publication contents at the Internet Speculative Fiction Database

First use is in Dragonflight. Please review this. Once it is OK, I will add see-also notes to the other isfdb templates. Thanks. --Mirokado (talk) 00:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Tannhauser Gate

The existence / content of Tannhauser Gate is being discussed; your oversight would be helpful. -- cheers, Michael C. Price ^talk 00:59, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

CHON

The CHON article makes claims that the four elements Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen and Nitrogen are astrobiologically important elements, and that the term "CHON" is widely used in Science Fiction literature. But the assertions in that article are unsourced, and have remained unsourced even though tagged, for some months now. If sources are not found, it would appear that the meat of the CHON article will be removed in the near future. See Talk on the CHON page to help out. Would love to have some help from interested members of the Science Fiction Wikiproject in fixing this; assuming CHON is, indeed, an important concept in Science Fiction. Cheers. N2e (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

You probably mean they are astrobiologically important elements. Regards, RJH (talk) 18:32, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes, thanks, RJHall. I miswrote. I've corrected it now. Also spelled out a couple of terms to avoid any minunderstanding. N2e (talk) 21:48, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Understood. I appreciate your efforts to improve this article. Comparable types of issues can be found on the extraterrestrial life article, which would seem an essential topic for both astrobiology and science fiction concepts. Unfortunately it is something of an unsourced mess right now, at least to me. RJH (talk)

Hello again WikiProject Science Fiction folks. Whatever may be the merits of CHON as astrobiologically important in science fiction, it appears no editor ever located any sources for the unsourced claims that had been in the CHON article, despite being fact-tagged for the past three months. I have now removed those claims pending sources. Thanks RJHall for your response to my earlier note in August. Cheers. N2e (talk) 15:26, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

That works for me. Thanks N2e. The deleted statement about the abundance of those four elements would have required some clarification, as the concentration is created by enrichment of the ISM following stellar nucleosynthesis. Hence it depends on where you look. If you isolate it to just the Milky Way galaxy then the statement is true. It may not be true for newly formed galaxies or the intergalactic medium. The "abundance of the chemical elements" article has more information. Regards, RJH (talk) 16:48, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Navigation templates

We currently have the following general (nonseries/author/subgenre related) navigation templates in use: Template:Science fiction, Template:Speculative fiction. The first is fairly widely linked, was originally in a vertical format, now horizontal. the latter is barely used. Both have some serious problems, and some good ideas. I wonder if anyone would like to share their thoughts on improving them? I am preparing a list at my sandbox of important SF related articles, and want to check my list against these two templates, and create a new template using the best ideas from both. (ive already copied the projects list of key articles over there, to be sure they are included) Key questions:

• Do we like the horizontal format, which places it in the same area as templates for authors? Or do we prefer the vertical format, which I see a lot for articles on religions, movements, etc? Do we maybe want both, for 2 different purposes? speculative fiction also has a portal, of course (great work there), but the term is much less familiar to an encyclopedia reader, more so to us fans of the genres.
• Should we have any, or very few if any, links to categories or poorly sourced articles or lists? some topics are to my thinking notable, but have really sucky articles right now, such as Social science fiction, and they have lots of links to categories, which i think is frowned upon. (ps i plan to create a stand alone list of SF publishers, with brief comments on each one).
• Do we want an image? So far, we've had a magazine cover in the past (not the greatest) for the SF template, and more recently File:Isaac Asimov on Throne.png, File:Gortray.jpg (current, my idea), and additionally suggested (by me) File:Culture's orbital2.jpg, File:Spacecolony3edit.jpeg. Gortray and spacecolony would work better if vertical, as would asimov (which is wonderfully iconic), while culture works for a horizontal navbox. I scoured wikimedia commons for these images, but may have missed something.(like File:Ringworld.jpg! just found)
• If i dont get a lot of feedback, ill be fairly bold, as i feel i have a pretty good understanding of the genre (ive created some sf author templates and improved some sf articles, and created some sf articles).I will check here for feedback.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:32, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

I don't have any specific preference, but you are welcome to review the main page of P:SF to get more ideas. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 09:09, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

The horizontal layout is typically used for NavBoxes, which appear at the bottom of an article. The vertical layout is usually used in the body of an article; particularly for the Infobox. As long as the respective templates are used for those purposes, I don't have an issue with the layout. If you are planning to use Template:Speculative fiction as an infobox, then adding fields for an optional image/caption might be a good idea. Otherwise, maybe a simple icon such as File:Sfbook.png or File:Nuvola apps konquest.png would work. Thanks. Regards, RJH (talk) 17:17, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Requests for assessment

Just wanted to leave a note that there are several requests for assesment at Wikipedia:WikiProject Science Fiction/Assessment#Requesting an assessment. Thanks. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 18:01, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

fringe_(TV_series)

anybody working on fringe articles organizing here? I need to find 1. a good online forum to understand some of the premises that I think are at work on the show. 2. I can help convey the plot clearly here on wikipedia.

if you know fringe you know that there has been an alternate reality in place for season 4. I am still a few eipsodes behind but--- characters are all a little different. fine, it's sci -fi. but mostly, it just seems like the show is not as good. I need to know if the producers are slipping or if this is all going to pay off somehow. I have no patience. thanks.

btw, fringepedia has my IP blocked & it seems kind soap-opera-crufty. help! S*K*A*K*K 15:41, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Adventure science fiction

This page seems to be overlap with military and opera science fiction. It seems in this edit that it just replaces military science fiction. --Peppage^tlk 15:26, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction online

Slashdot reports that The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, edited by John Clute, David Langford and Peter Nicholls, has gone live at http://sf-encyclopedia.com . It's a "beta" version of the third edition by Gollancz, and at first glance, it appears to be a treasure-trove of reliable information about SF, if a bit western-oriented. — Yerpo ^Eh? 08:22, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Please participate in the FAC review for The Adventures of Brisco County, Jr.

I nominated this article a week ago at FAC, and have so far received no feedback. I'd appreciate comments, feedback, and (hopefully!) support for this article, which I have put a lot of work into. Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 15:30, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Science-fiction operas

I notice that none of the entries in Category:Science fiction operas, including the name article (with its hyphen) are tagged by this project. Is this deliberate? Fyi the Vernian Doctor Ox's Experiment (opera) is going to hit the DYK section of the main page real soon now.--Peter cohen (talk) 18:16, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

No, not deliberate. More likely just not done yet. Feel free to tag them. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. The only one I didn't tag wasa the Klingon one which already has a WPST banner. I didn't assess any as I'm not familiar with this project's rating criteria.--Peter cohen (talk) 16:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposal for WikiProject Fictional Lists

I'm proposing a wikiproject to cover fictional lists, which a large number of articles are also within the scope of Science Fiction. I was hoping some of you here might be interested, or have some suggestions. The proposal will cover all List of fictional foo type articles. If anyone's interested let me know. Ncboy2010 (talk) 15:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Jericho TV episode articles need rescuing

At the moment, every episode of the Jericho (TV series), linked from List of Jericho episodes, has its own article. Several of these are quite elaborate; however most are only plot recaps, with little sourced information about production, reception, reviews, or any third party sources. So they are at threat of being merged into the list article for lack of sourcing or notability. See Talk:List_of_Jericho_episodes#Jericho_episode_articles_being_deleted. I've managed to hold back the last attempt, but if the articles are not brought up to standard, they probably will not survive much longer. I tried to find some Jericho fan communities to get some interested participants, but they all seem inactive or not taking new members. Barsoomian (talk) 13:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposal to delete the article Eight deadly words

The article on the Eight deadly words has been proposed for deletion based on lack of notability. This is Dorothy J. Heydt's famous catchphrase, ""I don't care what happens to these people," for a book with forgettable characters.

Please see Talk:Eight deadly words for previous discussions of notability, and visit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eight deadly words to voice your opinion on the deletion proposal. Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 01:40, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

What is fiction?

Is this accurate? Is it complete? Please take a quick look. Thank you. The Transhumanist 23:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Help needed

Can anybody help me in making a Men in Black (franchise) portal. I think it's a good franchise, and most of all, with the upcoming 3D movie, many articles in the franchise need updating. I hope anybody or somebody can help — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.198.217.185 (talk) 01:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

WP Science Fiction in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Science Fiction for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign each answer. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 05:38, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

The Rocky Horror Picture Show

I lowered the rating to start, but this may be to low to some so, please feel free to adjust as the project sees fit. The article had a great deal of unsourced material, but some may still see this as a possible C class. Unsure, so I am making note on all the projects for input.--Amadscientist (talk) 07:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Calling this film science fiction is like calling Hamlet a comedy. I suppose it is in a weird, twisted, reality-stretching way. :-) Regards, RJH (talk) 20:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

The Shrike

I am trying to salvage The Shrike. Is there somebody here with experience editing fictional character articles who could help me figure out the best way to organize and source that article? Jehochman ^Talk 19:16, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Scientific Romance

I'm working on the page for scientific romance. There's a lot to be done and it would be great if people who know about the early history of SF could pitch in. Euchrid (talk) 06:35, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

«Science Fiction Book Review Index»

I found today on http://repository.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/6416 a list of «Science Fiction Book Review Index Annual Volumes», that covers years 1969—1990. All of them are available in PDF format, but from the first glance they doesn't support an internal search. Nevertheless, it might help to resolve a problem: where to find reliable sources for SF articles. --Alogrin (talk) 20:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

This is an awesome resource. Thank you for posting it here. I'm going to be downloading all of them for future reference. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 07:26, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Moving "Isaac Asimov's ..." articles

I've made a new proposal to rename Isaac Asimov's Robot Series and Isaac Asimov's Galactic Empire series in line with the naming conventions. Please have your say on the discussion there. --xensyria^T 19:01, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Robocop peer review

The article needs some work. I have started a peer review to get input from others. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 20:17, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Halloween III on Featured Article Review

I have nominated Halloween III: Season of the Witch for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. George Ho (talk) 18:25, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

New Wave

Afternoon all, I just wanted to give a heads up that I've started work on overhauling the New Wave science fiction. I'm not adding much new information, just trying to fix the wording and layout and make it more encyclopedic and less of a collection of long quotes. As a top-level importance article I'm moving slowly, making one change a day, with an eye towards giving people time to discuss, though thus far nobody has. If anyone would like to critique my changes thus far, or pitch in, please feel free.Euchrid (talk) 03:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

WP:FLRC delist nomination

I have nominated List of Stargate SG-1 episodes for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Matthewedwards (talk · contribs) 18:31, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Men in Black wikiproject

I think the franchise is good, and I think it deserves a wikiproject like any other Sci-fi franchises such as Star Wars and Star Trek. We currently have very few active members Writing this down as an ad for anyone wanting to join. Thanks...27.108.158.237 (talk) 07:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC)