Jump to content

User talk:76.66.197.17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but I highly recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (76.66.197.17) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! (John User:Jwy talk) 06:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfC

[edit]

Hi there,

I've declined your submission of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christmas bomb at AFC.

~ DC (Talk|Edits) 00:23, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation

[edit]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Mimia (Actinopterygii) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 07:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Enemy Mine

[edit]

Because there are quite a few things that this term refers to, I've moved things around so that the disambiguation page is the first hit, and the article you've been editing is at Enemy Mine (novella). I didn't change anything else. Shadowjams (talk) 07:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Dinner-time was created.

  • The article has been assessed as Dab-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
  • If you would to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 08:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Supper-time was created.

  • The article has been assessed as Dab-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
  • If you would to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 08:38, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Ring of Fire I was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 11:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Ring of Fire 1 was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 11:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation

[edit]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Tactical Unit (film) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Calmer Waters 09:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and PTU (film series) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Calmer Waters 09:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Joy Keenan was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 19:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and M⊙ was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 21:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Days of Infamy (disambiguation) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 00:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Days of Infamy (novel) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 00:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Days of Infamy (Harry Turtledove) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Days of Infamy (2004 novel) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Days of Infamy (William R. Forstchen) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Days of Infamy (2008 novel) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and 1945 (Forstchen novel) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and 1945 (William R. Forstchen) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and 1945 (Newt Gingrich) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and 1945 (1995 novel) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and 1945 (Robert Conroy) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and 1945 (2007 novel) was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and All Quiet on the Western Front (disambiguation) was created.

  • The article has been assessed as Dab-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
  • If you would to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! ~DC Talk To Me 07:33, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of East Asian out-of-winter snowstorms of 2009

[edit]

A tag has been placed on East Asian out-of-winter snowstorms of 2009, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

noteworthiness

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 86.29.130.1 (talk) 02:33, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: WP:ANI Vandal Report

[edit]

{{Talkback|Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|User:Darthchess|07:07, 15 January 2010 (UTC)}}

replied. 76.66.197.17 (talk) 07:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Christopher Hotel was created.

  • The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
  • If you would to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. --220.101.28.25 (talk) 14:40, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization of Haiti earthquake articles.

[edit]

I will concede your point on the main earthquake article. But I disagree about the Casualties and Response articles belonging in the main category. The guidelines in question are WP:SUBCAT and Eponymous categories. Your point is valid for the "Main" article. I disagree that the other two are "Main" articles, however. They are sub-articles to the main earthquake article. In this way, your argument that is on-point for the "Main" article does not work for the ones that are not the main article. Similarly, looking at the guidelines above, the second link about Eponymous categories is the exception to WP:SUBCAT that supports your position on the main category. For the other two, the key categories are *not* eponymous, not similarly named, and thus IMHO the exception does not apply.

If you can find a different exception to WP:SUBCAT that supports your position on the other two articles, please let me know of it.

I'll not revert you any more at this point, but if we remain in disagreement, then we'll need to take this to the talk pages of the two articles in question to get wider opinions. I suspect, however, that we may get a distinct lack of additional responses, as categories are an area of minor interest to many, many editors. - TexasAndroid (talk) 02:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was in my estimation that the other two were also the "main" articles for their categories. While not eponymous, they are similarly named to the categories in which they appear to serve as the root categories for.
"Casualties" - all the content of the category "people associated" were victims of the quake, hence casualties, whether they were killed, injured or trapped.
76.66.197.17 (talk) 04:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. At least 4 members of the category are not victims at all. George Hook, Wyclef Jean, Raymond Joseph, Denis O'Brien. I named the category very specifically to not exclude non-victims. The other category is Releif, while the other article is Response. Those are IMHO related, but not at all the same thing. - TexasAndroid (talk) 23:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I stand corrected on the people/casualty issue. I still think the other one is sufficiently intertwined to serve as the main article. 76.66.197.17 (talk) 05:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The category seems to be formulated in an overly broad manner, I have made a proposal to restrict its scope, see Category talk:People associated with the 2010 Haiti earthquake#Proposal - restriction of scope - 76.66.197.17 (talk) 11:27, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Voltar was created.

  • The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
  • If you would to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Samwb123Please read 18:16, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, 76.66.197.17, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --86.29.129.213 (talk) 02:57, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Centrism

[edit]

Hi

At CFD 2010 January 1, Category:Centrism was renamed to Category:Centrist political parties.

Since this was a recent discussion, I thought it fair to notify you that at the suggestion of PanchoS I have added Category:Centrist political parties to a group nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 March 8#Centrist_organizations. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:52, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/All Quiet on the Eastern Front concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/All Quiet on the Eastern Front, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:09, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission All Quiet on the Eastern Front

[edit]

Hello 76.66.197.17. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled All Quiet on the Eastern Front.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/All Quiet on the Eastern Front}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:23, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:76.66.197.17&oldid=1140861796"