Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 September 9

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< September 8 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 10 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 9

[edit]

00:03, 9 September 2024 review of submission by 69.157.87.189

[edit]

What would make this more notable? The reviewer mention there was not sufficient independent coverage. But I had included several external links, including a few to notable literary awards. 69.157.87.189 (talk) 00:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disagreed with the review, worked on it, and accepted it. Also, I have messaged the rejecting reviewer too. Congratulations! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

03:15, 9 September 2024 review of submission by 189.202.71.98

[edit]

Kenneth Ian Valdivieso Almeida is for Mexico 189.202.71.98 (talk) 03:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @189.202.71.98, your draft was rejected as "not sufficiently suitable for Wikipedia" because it doesn't meet our general notability guidelines. Also, being a YouTuber is not enough as you need to show how he is notable as a YouTuber; and it includes: YouTube creators award, impact he has made as a creator, appearances in multiple reliable news, e.t.c. You may like to read HELP:YFA. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

03:44, 9 September 2024 review of submission by Wikiproject2024

[edit]

How can I rewrite this article to sound more neutral? I used the Rotary Youth Exchange wikipedia website as a guide. Can you provide an example to help me fix the draft? Wikiproject2024 (talk) 03:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Wikiproject2024 and how are you're doing?
Your draft has been tagged for speedy deletion as not written in a neutral encyclopedic format. Writing on Wikipedia involves giving time to research about the topic and not using what the website says. If I have a website and you go to my "about" segment, you may see praises about me like: "passionate about reading and has indigenously added impact to his country and beyond the world." Same is applicable when writing from the company's website. However, you should not use promotional WP:PEACOCK terms while writing an article. Simply show us how the organisation is notable using reliable sources. You may like to see other company/organisation's article (Facebook, Wikipedia, and so on) to see how it is written. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But if i use words like "unique" is that puffery language even if there isnt another one like it within the Rotary scholarships and programs and it only exists within one state in the USA? Wikiproject2024 (talk) 04:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:WTW. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It should only be described as unique if it is also said which third party is making that claim- it shouldn't say so in Wikipedia's voice. (i.e. "according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitition, this program is unique in the United States because....") Nor should it say so if the only people who say it's unique is the program itself. 331dot (talk) 07:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you associated with this program in some way, such as being assigned the task of writing about it by the program? ("project" is in your username) 331dot (talk) 07:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, I am not associated with this program. I had to write a wikipedia article as part of a college class, that's why project is in my username :) I could write about anything and noticed this program didn't have a wikipedia page. Thanks for the help Wikiproject2024 (talk) 16:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiproject2024 Assigning you the task of writing a Wikipedia article as part of a class is extremely unfair to you, as you actually have little control over the process. Your instructor may wish to review the Wikipedia Education Program materials to better incorporate Wikipedia into their lessons, in such a way as to not put students in a difficult position. 331dot (talk) 17:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

05:17, 9 September 2024 review of submission by GrisWGris

[edit]

Thanks in advance. I would like the title of the page to be Garry Gray and simply to link the brief profile to my Sacred Cowboys post punk Wiki page. If people look for me they can link to Sacred Cowboys. Regards, Garry 

GrisWGris (talk) 05:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done: @GrisWGris, note that writing an WP: AUTOBIOGRAPHY is not advised herein. I have moved the page to your desired title and hence it's eligible for deletion by any editor, if it meets any criteria. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06:15, 9 September 2024 review of submission by Streamerdude

[edit]

I have submitted a draft article, but it has not been published yet, and I would like to understand the reasons behind this. Could you please provide guidance on why my draft has not been accepted and what specific steps I can take to improve it to meet the publication standards?

Your assistance in helping me get the article recognized would be greatly appreciated. Streamerdude (talk) 06:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft doesn't appear to meet WP:NSOFT. Almost, if not all the sources are unreliable. It's should be pure that GitHub, Zoom Inc, e.t.c are unreliable sources and doesn't show WP:SIGCOV (one of the reasons for the article's deletion three years ago). Please read WP:RS for tips on identifying reliable sources. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:31, 9 September 2024 review of submission by Vanityorpride

[edit]

How does the article look now for approval for a Wikipedia article posted on the main space Vanityorpride (talk) 13:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanityorpride: this draft has now been rejected, and will therefore not be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanityorpride Please see User talk:Theroadislong § My Draft:Bjorn Vido passes as under the WP:General Notability Guideline where I am unable to answer your final question. Why? Because I have no answer for you. Others might.
Instead, let me ask you one of my own. If you are certain that Vido passes the notability threshold, why not move it to become an article yourself?
Several reviewers have suggested that Vido does not make the grade. You are entitled to disagree. The community may agree with you, or may not. That is a risk everyone takes with new articles. If you move it, please tidy the AFC artefacts up after the move 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 15:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:44, 9 September 2024 review of submission by Vanityorpride

[edit]

Please review how the article is written now as I did paraphrase and summarised the articles he is mentioned in plus did research on reliable sources after this article is published I plan to edit other articles to gain more credibility on Wikipedia as someone who knows what they are doing Vanityorpride (talk) 13:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft has been declined 9 times and rejected once it doesn't show how they pass WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 15:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanityorpride Please do not open new discussions. The existing one is perfectly sufficient. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 15:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:47, 9 September 2024 review of submission by Liyafromspace

[edit]

I am requesting assistance with resubmitting the Draft: Dima_XR. The draft was previously rejected, but I believe it now meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. Dima XR is an established artist with multiple concerts this month, featuring guest artists (Dudu Faruk, who already have Wikipedia pages. These collaborations, combined with Dima XR's growing influence and public presence, further solidify his relevance. I would appreciate guidance on how to strengthen the draft, particularly in terms of notability, and ensure that it aligns with Wikipedia's standards for sources and verifiability for resubmission. Liyafromspace (talk) 13:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liyafromspace: before we get to that, can I ask what is your relationship with this subject? And are you also operating the Liyabelll account? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:40, 9 September 2024 review of submission by Tuckermanguy

[edit]

how do I submit a draft for review Tuckermanguy (talk) 14:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tuckermanguy, the draft has been submitted for review. However, it is not appropriate for Wikipedia so I have rejected it. Qcne (talk) 14:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On the draft for the article, there's a big button that says "Submit the draft for review." However, it is extremely unlikely that this draft would be approved in its current state. No case for notability is made, no sources are provided for any of the facts presented, and the whole thing is written in an unencyclopedic manner. The only source, just slapped on the end, is simply an organization that he allegedly volunteers for. This article needs a lot of work, and I don't see the case for notability at all. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Me neither. Gave 'em my deletion notice. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17:14, 9 September 2024 review of submission by Jhanjeriboy

[edit]

i need help to submit my article Jhanjeriboy (talk) 17:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jhanjeriboy You submitted it for review, but then bypassed the review process by moving it manually to the main encyclopaedia. Qcne (talk) 17:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
However, it has been declined every time. Could you please let me know the reason? Jhanjeriboy (talk) 17:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was declined once as you did not prove notability under WP:NSCHOOL. Qcne (talk) 17:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have submitted the reference, and it has been live for the last 2 years. However, it was suddenly deleted, and Wikipedia is not accepting it. Jhanjeriboy (talk) 17:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I have WP:BLARed the draft to article moved page to the main topic, Chandigarh Group of Colleges. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Three different Institutions under CGC
However, there are three distinct institutions under the CGC.
Despite having similar names, Chandigarh Group of Colleges (CGC Landran), Chandigarh Group of Colleges (CGC Jhanjeri), and Chandigarh University are three separate educational institutions, each with its own location and unique identity.
Please review this information once again. Jhanjeriboy (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I kindly request that my article be moved to the Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Jhanjeri page, and not be redirected to the Chandigarh Group of Colleges page. As I have already mentioned, there are three separate educational institutions with similar names: Chandigarh Group of Colleges (CGC Landran), Chandigarh Group of Colleges (CGC Jhanjeri), and Chandigarh University. Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Jhanjeri is a different location, so please ensure my article is placed under the correct institution, which is Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Jhanjeri, and not Chandigarh Group of Colleges. Jhanjeriboy (talk) 13:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Repeating your request 38 minutes after you make is isn't likely to be effective. This is a volunteer effort. You did not show that this college merits a standalone article. 331dot (talk) 13:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let me know what should i do? Jhanjeriboy (talk) 14:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is no longer an issue about the draft submission process. If you feel that this particular location merits a standalone article and should not be included in the article about the overall organization, I first suggest that you expand the portion of the existing article about it to show that it is a notable organization itself, then you can start a discussion about splitting the article. 331dot (talk) 14:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jhanjeriboy I have sorted it:
I removed the redirect and restored your draft, it is not submitted for review yet: Draft:Chandigarh_Group_of_Colleges,_Jhanjeri.
You also moved your userpage to the main encyclopedia, I have reverted that too. Qcne (talk) 14:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I moved my username by mistake Jhanjeriboy (talk) 14:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jhanjeriboy: you've now recreated the article at the variant spelling Chandigarh Group Of Colleges, Jhanjeri. I'm struggling to WP:Assume good faith here. Why haven't you improved the draft, and submitted that for review? Wikishovel (talk) 15:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:02, 9 September 2024 review of submission by AtlasMarck

[edit]

"Hello! I would like to request assistance with Spanish to ensure accuracy. I previously attempted to produce English content, but it was unfortunately declined. Could you please provide guidance?"AtlasMarck (talk) 19:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AtlasMarck The Spanish Wikipedia has different policies and editors than the English Wikipedia. What is acceptable there is not necessarily acceptable here. Your text was unambiguously promotional, it talked up the person and told of their activities. Instead, it should summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about him, showing how he meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. 331dot (talk) 19:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your draft was rejected and deleted because it was unsuitable for inclusion on Wikipedia. However, you may use any machine translator to translate from Spanish to English without submitting it, otherwise it will be declined. From there I can help as Miguel Angel Ramirez Alonso appears to be notable. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:41, 9 September 2024 review of submission by Benm1909

[edit]

Hi there, I'm wondering what else I can add to this page to help it pass muster. It's in depth, independently sourced and cited, and includes links to board members, all with their own established wikipedia pages. Any guidance would be appreciated. Benm1909 (talk) 19:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most of your sources are the organization itself, and the ones that aren't just mention the organization. Any article about this organization must summarize independent reliable sources which discuss the organization itself and what makes it a notable organization as Wikipedia defines it. Having board members who are notable is insufficient, notability is not inherited by association. 331dot (talk) 19:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you are associated with this organization, that must be disclosed, see WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 19:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Benm1909. Wikipedia has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. ColinFine (talk) 10:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2024_September_9&oldid=1245768480"