Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 October 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< October 16 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 18 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


October 17

[edit]

03:24, 17 October 2024 review of submission by Thisisyuvan

[edit]

These are notable sources for this article.but,those are said that's not notable.then,which one is good for notable works Thisisyuvan (talk) 03:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft has been rejected, meaning AfC reviewers will not consider accepting it further. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which one is good notable work sites Thisisyuvan (talk) 03:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your article contained A LOT OF unreliable sources. (Daily motion, WP:YOUTUBE WP:DISCOGS) I don't see reliable sources that contribute to establishing notability in the draft at all. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:35, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unreliable sources are removed.then what I will do next.. Thisisyuvan (talk) 03:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please replace them with reliable sources. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Google knowledge panel is reliable? 2409:408D:4EC7:EF6D:0:0:5F8A:A113 (talk) 03:50, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 05:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is ChatGPT reliable? 2603:6080:BE00:6783:481A:CFE8:E20B:577 (talk) 19:46, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, ChatGPT is not reliable. Qcne (talk) 19:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Thisisyuvan: this question was already asked and answered here yesterday, and judging by your style of writing, I'm guessing that was by you. Please don't ask the same question over and over, especially about a draft that has already been rejected and will not be considered further.
I'm also assuming from your user name that you are the subject of this draft. Please note that Wikipedia is not to be used for any sort of promotion, including self-promotion. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I understand your final answer on not publishing this article. just to let you know that I just happen to have the same name as the founder of the S.R.C.
-Jake Jhowa120p (talk) 04:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:45, 17 October 2024 review of submission by Natan Consigli

[edit]

Hello Is the draft of this wikipedia article neutral, formal and encyclopaedic as it should be? Let me know if there's anything else I could do to improve the article further. Thanks! Natan Consigli (talk) 09:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have submitted the draft for a review, the reviewer will leave you feedback if it is not accepted. 331dot (talk) 09:48, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:56, 17 October 2024 review of submission by 77.77.218.177

[edit]

The Draft Will be moving into a Article. She able to ready and added sources per WP:SOURCED. 77.77.218.177 (talk) 13:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have submitted it for a review, it will be reviewed in due course. This could take time, so please be patient. 331dot (talk) 13:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:09, 17 October 2024 review of submission by 2601:184:497F:AEC0:C9AA:8A57:D20C:AD16

[edit]

Dear Wikipedia team, I am a bit confused about why this submission was declined. The article includes several peer-reviewed references which seem to adhere to Wikipedia's requirements and are very similar to the references listed for other bioinformatics software tools with Wikipedia pages. Could you please provide further guidance? 2601:184:497F:AEC0:C9AA:8A57:D20C:AD16 (talk) 14:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Get rid of the download links and code repositories to the software; they're unhelpful. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:18, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done! Just resubmitted 69.173.97.221 (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:12, 17 October 2024 review of submission by 213.194.150.111

[edit]

I tried to publish an article on Sagique but was denier because it's too much of a definition, and doesn't expand enough on the subject. Could you give me some suggestions on how to expand on it? 213.194.150.111 (talk) 14:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed your post to link to your draft as intended(you need the "Draft:" portion). Remember to log in when posting. Unless you have independent reliable sources with significant coverage of this term, that discuss its use and history, it would not merit a Wikipedia article. 331dot (talk) 14:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20:04, 17 October 2024 review of submission by Bluebox57

[edit]

I am requesting assistance because I am a volunteer with the Organization of Opera Orlando, and I have been trying to publish this article about three times. I am worried about editing my draft then submitting it for review only for it to get rejected again. I don't want this article to get deleted because of my incompetence. I thought I followed the advice of the previous reviewers, but it seems I am still getting the same answer, please help. Bluebox57 (talk) 20:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a volunteer, you should declare a conflict of interest, see WP:COI for instructions. Drafts aren't deleted due to mere editing. Between your last two submissions, you removed content, but you didn't add reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 20:29, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Like most people who trry to create an article without having spent significant time learning how Wikipedia works by editing, you appear to have created the article BACKWARDS.
First find sources that are reliably published, wholly indepedent of the company - not, for example, published by a university that the company collaborated with - and giving significant coverage to the company (not just to a person involved, or to a particular production). See WP:42 for the triple criteria that these sources must pass.
Then, if you have found at least three sources which meet those criteria, forget every single thing you know about the company, and write a summary of what those sources say. This is one of the reasons why creating an article is even more difficult if you have a COI. Not one single thing that you know about the company belongs in the article, unless you can find a reliable published source for it. (Uncontroversial factual information like dates and places may be taken from non-independent sources, as long as the bulk comes from independent sources.)
My earnest advice to new editors is to not even think about trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Wikipedia works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as verifiability, neutral point of view, reliable, independent sources, and notability, and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle), then you might be ready to read your first article carefully, and try creating a draft. ColinFine (talk) 21:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

21:44, 17 October 2024 review of submission by Hectorinaaa

[edit]

Can I add languages or is that only possible if the draft is accepted? Hectorinaaa (talk) 21:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If by "add languages" you mean translate the draft for other language Wikipedias, you are free to do that; each language Wikipedia is a separate project. You'll need to make sure that the translation is acceptable for the Wikipedia version you are editing, each has different policies. 331dot (talk) 21:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hectorina, your draft is about a child who lived about 420 years ago and who died at six years of age. What makes her notable other than her royal ancestry? Wouldn't it be best to cover her in the articles about her parents? Notability is not inherited. Cullen328 (talk) 07:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, @Hectorinaaa. I'm guessing you mean, link it to related articles in other Wikipedias, such as no:Anna Maria Vasa and pl:Anna Maria Wazówna (polska królewna)? The answer is no, not until it becomes an article in mainspace. ColinFine (talk) 11:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No no, you know how on the top if you click the 3 languages, and it takes you to those sites. Hectorinaaa (talk) 11:47, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hectorinaaa: that is what ColinFine meant. Those links link published articles in different language versions of Wikipedia. A draft is not yet a published article. Therefore those links can only be added once (if) the draft is accepted for publication. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh okay, thank you! Hectorinaaa (talk) 13:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2024_October_17&oldid=1253193870"