Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 December 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< December 1 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 3 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 2

[edit]

07:34:03, 2 December 2022 review of draft by Venessa Ferns

[edit]


I want to understand what it means when it says that the subject of my article already exists in wikipedia, because of which my article was declined from being published.

Venessa Ferns (talk) 07:34, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have created a draft about a topic that we already have an article on, see the article here Chetan Bhagat. Theroadislong (talk) 07:51, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08:32:01, 2 December 2022 review of submission by Hairmer

[edit]


Hi, I want to know how to improve this draft and resubmit. Admin said "Entire draft sniffs of puffery." Please provide me advice for improving and resubmitting.Hairmer (talk) 08:32, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hairmer (talk) 08:32, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hairmer: this draft has been rejected and won't be considered further. You'd have to completely rewrite it, and demonstrate notability beyond any doubt. Judging by the current contents and sources, that seems a tall order. I also don't see anything in there that would explain why this warrants inclusion in a global encyclopaedia; as it stands, this would be a prime candidate for A7 speedy deletion. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:51, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12:20:28, 2 December 2022 review of submission by 38.135.8.42

[edit]


38.135.8.42 (talk) 12:20, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but this draft, such as it is, has been rejected and won't be considered further, other than for deletion. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:22, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:26:52, 2 December 2022 review of submission by 41.210.145.145

[edit]


41.210.145.145 (talk) 16:26, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to User:Jéské Couriano/Decode:
You have no usable sources; the article as written and sourced is thus not going to pass review. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 17:10, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:32:45, 2 December 2022 review of submission by Wizardunicorn

[edit]

Hello there, I have reviewed the article and added awards as well as investment rounds to it. I have also reviewed the text to make sure I remove all sections that could be deemed "advertising" Wizardunicorn (talk) 16:32, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wizardunicorn The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Funding rounds and niche awards do not establish notability. 331dot (talk) 16:42, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17:02:35, 2 December 2022 review of submission by 2404:4408:638C:5E00:3DE6:B2A4:FA9D:DD74

[edit]


My belief is it is factual, it is referenced and more balanced than List of Nazi monuments in Canada and Monuments in the United States to Nazi collaborators both either biased to pro-Russian Federation or revisionist and places similar emphasis on what apparently is the key point, these people worked with the Nazi's and ignores whys and what for's

2404:4408:638C:5E00:3DE6:B2A4:FA9D:DD74 (talk) 17:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18:18:32, 2 December 2022 review of submission by 104.153.242.132

[edit]

The game is sufficient notable. 104.153.242.132 (talk) 18:18, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not, which is why it was rejected and will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 19:09, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:32:27, 2 December 2022 review of submission by Thekatedee

[edit]

Below is the dress Kate Dee has gotten lately.

Press

https://avn.com/business/press-release/video/kate-dee-asks-dick-dangle-for-daily-wake-up-calls-in-new-intervie-909007.html

https://fleshbot.com/8670551/twenty-questions-with-hot-porn-star-kate-dee/


https://www.xbiz.com/news/265572/kate-dee-stars-opposite-king-louie-smalls-for-industryinvaders

https://www.xbiz.com/news/265572/kate-dee-stars-opposite-king-louie-smalls-for-industryinvaders

https://www.xbiz.com/news/267453/kate-dee-touts-2-fleshlight-pro-toys-3-new-scenes

https://www.xbiz.com/news/267888/kate-dee-guests-on-new-episode-of-danglin-after-dark


https://magazine-files.avn.com/avn/2022/october-2fb6818be98622373b4c678269609bc3381bb34d/#p=40 Thekatedee (talk) 22:32, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 23:30:23, 2 December 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Kwilsonwallace

[edit]


Hello! I'm trying to figure out what Andrew Prahlow's Wikipedia page was declined again. I feel like there's significant coverage about him including multiple interviews listed as references. Is there a specific line or project that should be taken out or would it be helpful to list more of his interviews? Thank you for your help!

Kwilsonwallace (talk) 23:30, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kwilsonwallace The draft was resubmitted on 3 November, and it's currently awaiting re-review. David10244 (talk) 08:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks David10244! I received a message from user OceanHok on November 29 that said "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)."
Wasn't sure if I still needed to try and update or just wait for the official review? Kwilsonwallace (talk) 18:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You may continue to edit it even after submission. 331dot (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kwilsonwallace Now I'm confused; maybe @331dot can help. The topmost thing on the draft says "review pending", but that part is not dated. I couldn't quite decipher the draft history, so now, I'm not sure of the status. David10244 (talk) 13:36, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
David10244 The date of submission is not included in the "review pending" notice, only in the edit history of the draft. It was submitted in this edit. A draft may continue to be edited even after it is submitted. 331dot (talk) 14:43, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot Thanks for that, I think I was confused by how many edits were after the submission.. David10244 (talk) 06:13, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kwilsonwallace Note that any sources that are interviews, or largely based on interviews, are not independent of the subject. So, adding more interviews will be unlikely to help demonstrate the subject's notability. David10244 (talk) 06:44, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you everyone for all of your help! Kwilsonwallace (talk) 22:49, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_December_2&oldid=1127291191"