Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 975

Archive 970

←

Archive 973

Archive 974

Archive 975

Archive 976

Archive 977

→

Archive 980

Raj dasireddy

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Pls create Wikipedia page raj dasireddy ,google him raj dasireddy or Sri raj hero — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sri raj dasireddy (talk • contribs) 05:11, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Referring to someone who has died as 'the late ...'

Hi

I am trying to find a guideline on whether editors should use the term 'the late' in articles when referring to a person who has died. I am sure there's such a guideline but cannot find it in the manual of style. Does anyone know where to find it?

Thanks!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:11, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Curb Safe Charmer WP:EUPHEMISM discusses how "died" should be used instead of other ways to say it, but I'm not sure about "the late". 331dot (talk) 08:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

(edit conflict) @Curb Safe Charmer: It might fall under MOS:EUPHEMISM, WP:RELTIME or maybe in some way even MOS:SURVIVEDBY. It doesn't sound very sound very encyclopedic (at least not to me) for Wikipedia's purposes. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Curb Safe Charmer Is it a particular problem in a particular place, and if so could you maybe point it out for us please? It's a bit different with euphemisms ("passed on" etc) as there's an idea of not disguising the meaning and calling a spade a spade, etc, but with "the late" I can't think of an obvious alternative usage – it's not like you can choose between The late Harold Wilson and The dead Harold Wilson and Harold Wilson, who is no longer with us etc etc – so to me it looks as if "the late" is possibly quite reasonable if the context requires it – obviously it would be very daft to say The late Julius Caesar in most imaginable contexts. So can you show us where it's bothering you, please? Thanks 82.39.96.55 (talk) 08:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your replies. I am chipping away at improving Yahaya Abubakar where the term is used five times. I am sure I can edit the article to avoid the term, but wanted to refer to a guideline in my edit summary. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:49, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

@Curb Safe Charmer: Having had a quick look, I'd certainly remove 'Late' from mention of family members. It would be the equivalent of including birth and death dates of siblings, and many would see this is not highly relevant to the article. And how do we know they're dead - is this included in citations? Either way, I'm also sure 'Late' shouldn't have a capital letter. The only occurrence I wold retain wold be in mention of his late uncle, who he succeeded. That's my personal take on it. Best wishes, Nick Moyes (talk) 09:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)  

I wouldn't worry about a style guidelines here, Curb Safe Charmer - I would just remove them for clarity's sake. It's unclear from the present wording whether "late" is signifying that the people are late now, or were late at the time of the article subject's birth. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

I agree wholeheartedly with all the advice above. I think all those "late"s were just making a mess of it and removing them is 100% right. What useful data were they adding?? None, and your editor-instincts were spot on. Cheers 82.39.96.55 (talk) 08:09, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Extended confirmed

Hi, I am now WP:EXTENDEDCONFIRMED (and have become a teahouse host), and I was just wondering: what other rights does this give me except for editing pages with Extended confirmed protection? WikiSmartLife (talk) 05:05, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi and welcome, WikiSmartLife. It also gives you the right to display an extended confirmed topicon, if you so choose. (Actually, there's nothing really keeping you from displaying the extended confirmed topicon as a non-ec editor so I guess this is more a privilege than a right.) However, while EC doesn't qualify you for WP:NPR, its requirements closely align with those and you might consider separately applying as additional help is always needed to clear the new page backlog. (edit - Since it appears most of the pages you've created have been deleted, you might have trouble joining the NPP just yet but it may be worthwhile to keep it in mind for the future.) Chetsford (talk) 08:17, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Concerning lists

I wanted to create content about witch-hunts in Nepal. In that process, I found myself wanting to create a list of related incidents in Nepal. The skeleton is here. The list can never be exhaustive but will have dozens of well-cited entries if created. Another experienced editor thought that there were enough sources to create an article Witch-hunts in Nepal with a lot of sociological content and minor attention to actual incidents. So, my question is; does the draft that I linked pass as a list article based on its format (event with "===" heading and a brief description)? If not, is there another way to create an article like it as something else other than a list? Any other advice? I feel it's probably too soon for me to try an article like Witch-hunts in Nepal given my inexperience but I'd be a lot more comfortable working on the article like that draft. That's why I am asking. Thanks! Usedtobecool ^✉️ ✨ 08:19, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

@Usedtobecool: I think the linked draft could very well work under the title Witch-hunts in Nepal as it is. You can later exapnd it to to include material on the sociological background and organize the list under a subheading "List of incidents" there. I would not recommend creating List of witch-hunt-related incidents in Nepal before Witch-hunts in Nepal as it usually makes little sense to have a list without an article about the phenomenon. There is nothing wrong with embedded lists (i.e. lists within articles that are not List of articles). And don't worry if the article is not quite complete when you first create it (e.g. lacking that sociology content). All articles are basically works in process. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:00, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. I am quite certain of what to do now. Usedtobecool ^✉️ ✨ 12:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

page canceled

Good morning, I created a page on Confassociazioni and it was immediately canceled, the code of the criterion for the cancellation is U5 so my voice was considered advertising, you know me explain why advertising and how can I do to create a voice that does not is it then deleted? thanks a lot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lufant (talk • contribs) 09:21, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Lufant Good day. As per your contribution log, your question above is your first edit - see [1] and no evident found for any article for either "n Confassociations" or "Draft:Confassociations". If the tag was U5 - which means " Blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host". Please read WP:Your First Article on how to write a article in Wikipedia and pls write the content in neutral point of view. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:00, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Lufant, I have removed your duplication of your original question. Please take the advice given to you here. 331dot (talk) 12:21, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Lufant You have post the same question 3 times and we have already answered you question. Pls see the message above. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:36, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia entries for our record label and artists

Count Zero Records is a community-based record label that helps artists without means fulfill their vision by providing international sales & distribution, marketing, legal advice, contracting, facilities and management training to its artists.

We work on a purely percentage based system and do not charge any fees to our artists, instead, every artist receives a percentage of all net proceeds of every song they worked on - for example as singer, rapper, producer or songwriter.

This allows artists with no means or team to professionally produce and release music and content.

Our producers, legal experts, marketing specialists, etc. work only on a percentage basis, with no up-front fees, and actually, no fees at all.

That is because they believe in the artist they are working with.

In a sense, we are like angel investors, only that we invest our time, money and effort for the benefit of artists without means in the context of a record label.

We would now love to create wikipedia pages for our label and artists.

So we have tried to create articles ourselves, but have met with very little success, as we are totally unfamiliar with the Wikipedia writing and syntax.

We then wanted to hire someone, until we read that that is against the rules on wikipedia.

At this point we are a bit out of ideas, as none of us has enough computer skills to make wikipedia articles.

If any of you have any advice, it would be greatly appreciated.

You can find our label at http://www.countzerorecords.com

All the best,

Count Zero — Preceding unsigned comment added by MonteAltoVenture (talk • contribs) 09:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

@MonteAltoVenture: Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. You can request that others write about your artists at Requested Articles, but it won't happen quickly, and may not be in the manner that you want. I think that you misunderstand the purpose of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a forum to merely tell about artists. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is interested in what independent reliable sources state about artists that meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable artist, written at WP:ARTIST. Wikipedia is not interested in what the artist(or their representative) wants to say about themselves, nor is it interested in 'spreading the word' or otherwise publicizing artists. 331dot (talk) 09:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi there and thank you for your fast answer! We are immensely disappointed to hear that we have mistaken Wikipedias approach over the last few years and supported it. I think what we thought was that Wikipedia is a platform where people can add their knowledge to a database, irrespective of their technical skill or someone's judgment of what is "important" and what is "not important". The approach as an encyclopedia moderated by a small number of people who decide what constitutes knowledge is not only wrong but dangerous. We have canceled our support payments and will express our opinions about the totalitarization of this once great service accordingly. We wish you all the best and will no longer seek to create Wikipedia articles. Best regards, Count Zero Records. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MonteAltoVenture (talk • contribs) 10:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

@MonteAltoVenture: I'm sorry that you feel that way, but as I said, Wikipedia is not and never has been a place to merely give information. I would inform you that your donations(which I assume is what you mean by "payments") or lack thereof have no bearing on Wikipedia content, as the Foundation only operates the servers, it does not dictate what appears here. You are, of course, free to operate your own website, or find an alternative outlet where what you want to do is permitted. You are also free to work to change the definition of an notable artist, by starting a talk page discussion. 331dot (talk) 11:04, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

There is no "small number of people who decide." There is a policy of requiring reliable sources, i.e., published by credible publications. Wht editors know to be true is not sufficient. Independent from sourcing, Wikipedia had definitions of notability. David notMD (talk) 14:09, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Tone of text in my draft

Hello all! My draft was unfortunately declined today saying that the tone of the text tends the draft to be more of a promotional work or a resume rather than an encyclopedic article. Can someone please take a look at it for me and give me some suggestions on how to improve my draft and resubmit it for reviewing? Thank you, Refluxdonut (talk) 22:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Courtesy link Draft:Milen Manoj Earath TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

@Refluxdonut: Small suggestion, try pronouns. It reads a wee bit like a radio commercial right now, repeating the name every five seconds. -A lad insane (Channel 2) 00:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

@A lad insane: Hello! Thank you for your feedback. Shall work on that. How else do you think I can improve the language of the draft to make it more of an encyclopedic article rather than a promotional work?

Thanking you, Refluxdonut (talk) 10:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

@Refluxdonut: I'm not great at rewriting, but I can offer one more suggestion: focus on the major details. For instance, "where he learned to play Beethoven's Für Elise" is more trivia than anything. Trim down the fluff. -A lad insane (Channel 2) 15:32, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Discover Cooking with Lavender

Helped
@Sam Sailor: Thank you for reviewing my article "Discover Cooking with Lavender". Please note that it meets this criteria:

"The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews. This excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book."

Discover Cooking with Lavender is the subject of reviews in the Seattle Times and the Oregonian. It was also the subject of a review in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and the Sequim Gazette. The Sequim Gazette is published by Sound Publishing, Inc., a subsidiary of Black Press. The United States Lavender Growers also presented Kathy Gehrt an award for her work and book. It was the "LIFT" Award, "Lavender Ideas for Tomorrow" and it was presented on March 26, 2014.

I've updated the article with this information and feel it is an appropriate listing for Wikipedia. Do you agree? (DashGraham (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2019 (UTC))

Thank you!

References

Hi @DashGraham: Your ping of Sam Sailor didn't go through because it wasn't formed correctly, so I've added that here moved your question to the article's talk page. Since this involves one particular article, the talk page of that article Draft Talk:Discover Cooking with Lavender is the best place discuss it, rather than here. I'm copying your question there, and adding some contents of my own. Orville1974^talk 16:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Removing old content

Please can someone help to remove old content — Preceding unsigned comment added by John Bladen (talk • contribs) 14:17, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

What is the "old content" you are talking about? WikiSmartLife (talk) 15:08, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, John Bladen, and welcome to the Teahouse. I presume you're talking about your changes to Llanrumney Hall? I must confess that I don't quite understand what you were trying to achieve by those edits: you can't use #REDIRECT in that way, and I see no evidence that the name of Llanrumney Hall has been changed to drop the "Hall" (unlike, for instance, Nostell Priory, which the National Trust now call just "Nostell". Oops: that article hasn't been updated yet). It is part of the way Wikipedia works that sometimes somebody makes an edit, and somebody else reverts it. The thing to do then, according to the policy in BRD, is to open a discussion on the article's talk page (here, Talk:Llanrumney Hall), explaining what change you want to make, and getting consensus on it. But what I will say is that Wikipedia does not necessarily remove information just because it is outdated: this is an encyclopaedia, not a directory. Changes to a topic may be added to an article (preferably sourced to a reliable published source), but often it will be appropriate to keep the former information, marked as such. --ColinFine (talk) 16:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Adding a new page with updated information on a credit card

Helped
Hello,

I'm referring to this credit card for my question:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palladium_Card

As you can see from that page, that credit card has changed names to a new credit card called the J.P. Morgan Reserve Card.

Since the name of the card has changed could I make a new page with the updated name and card information? Or should I only update the information on the current page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.254.162.76 (talk) 16:33, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, IP user. I see you've edited the article, with a citation for the change. I have therefore moved the article to J.P. Morgan Reserve Card (you are not able to do this as an anynomous editor, though you could have requested it at WP:RM). The move has left behind Palladium Card as a redirect, which seems to me to be right. Since the article is now titled "J.P. Morgan Reserve Card", it probably needs some further editing of tense etc to make it accurate. --ColinFine (talk) 17:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. I will create an account with wikipedia and edit that page. I will remove any inaccurate information and add additional relevant information.

Hi! Please don't remove any content that could be historical. Instead, please provide updated content about the new card. For instance, the "J.P. Morgan Reserve Card, previously known as the Palladium Card" etc. Thank you! Orville1974^talk 17:08, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the guidance. I will not remove any historical information. The only editing I will do is update and add information that is relevant to the card. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.254.162.76 (talk) 17:30, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Creating a page for an artist but my own information came up as copyrighted

I am trying to create a new page for an artist my gallery represents but after submitting my writing it came up as copyrighted based off of the press release we used for one of his shows. how can I get around this copyright or cite myself to ensure the article gets published? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mizumakipswada (talk • contribs) 18:09, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello @Mizumakipswada:, you can cite yourself and re-write the material so that you avoid copying or closely paraphasing the source. Because you are writing about an artist your gallery preperents you should review the plain and simple conflict of interest guide and follow the guidance there. Gab4gab (talk) 18:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Mizumakipswada. Gab4gab is right that you can get round the copyright issue by rewriting in your own words; but even if you do so, it is unlikely that anything from a press release will be appropriate for an article about your artist. Wikipedia is basically not interested in what you or your artist say or wish to say about him (including in an interview or press release) : it is only interested in what people who have no connection with the artist have chosen to publish about him in reliable places. Any article about him should be almost entirely based on such independent sources; and if there are few or no such published sources, then it is impossible to write an acceptable Wikipedia article about him at present: the jargon for that is that he is not notable. --ColinFine (talk) 19:07, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi I’ve been supporting wiki for decades and lost

My crews to login for a minor edit.

I’m a sysad circa 1993 can anyone help get my lankro account back to me the recovery email is ages old. I know bits (0/1) and bytes (FF).

Look for donations by christoper or chris parry.

I love you guys!

Getting over terrible cold, hope you guys can help.

-chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lankro2 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Lankro2, and welcome to the Teahouse. The Lankro (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) account was created in 2009 (Wikipedia didn't exist in 1993) and doesn't appear to have ever been used to make an edit. I would suggest just using your new account if you want to start editing. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your donations, Chris, but they are handled by the Wikimedia Foundation, which supports Wikipedia and all the other projects. Wikipedia editors - even admins - have no access to any non-public information about donations or donors. --ColinFine (talk) 19:21, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

What makes someone anti-communist?

Hello TH!, my article Alejandro Finocchiaro was categorized as "Argentine anti-communists" for some remarks, what defines anti-communism, remarks or way of thinking? Thanks.

PS: Nothing against the user who added it, just confused whether it should be included. Regards. --LLcentury (talk) 20:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

LLcentury, as far as Wikipedia is concerned, someone is an anti-communist if reliable sources call them an anti-communist. In this case, it's probably due to his comments about the Cuban flag, although this is a somewhat WP:SYNTH justification and likely wouldn't hold up on its own if someone wanted to argue against it. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:02, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification, he, as the government of that country is clearly anti-communist though no official source supports it. I'll leave it as it is, as far as it doesn't damage the article :) . --LLcentury (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Are Popular YouTubers Considered Noteworthy

I am trying to ascertain if the YouTube channel ‘Delos’ is considered noteworthy. They are sailing around the world on their yacht (named Delos) and they are very inspiring and generous people. They have 336k subscribers and some of their most popular videos have had over a million views. I am an independent freelance writer and would be the one writing the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erinndave (talk • contribs) 22:26, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello and welcome Erinndave! YouTubers are considered notable if they have received significant, non-routine coverage in reliable sources for more than one event. If a YouTuber has not received significant, non-routine coverage in reliable sources for more than one event then they are not considered notable, even if they have 100,000,000 subscribers. Conversely, a YouTuber that only had 12 subscribers but had received significant, non-routine coverage in reliable sources for more than one event would be notable. From a very cursory Google News check it appears Delos has been broadly covered by Yachting World and the Wall Street Journal. If there are a couple more sources out there it is probably notable. Chetsford (talk) 22:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Uploading images

Helped

How do you add the official artwork for a song with fair usage? Billiekhalidfan (talk) 01:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Billiekhalidfan. Technically, it's relatively easy; you just follow the instructions given in Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard. However, how the file is going to be able to be used depends upon it's copyright status. Since you've stated it's the official artwork (i.e. cover art) for a song, you're most likely going to need to upload the file as non-free content (this is sort of Wikipedia's version of fair use, but more restrictive). Non-free cover art files can be uploaded per item 1 of WP:NFCI, but generally this is only allowed when the file is being used for primary identification purposes at the top of or in the main infobox of a stand-alone article about the work (e.g. album, book, song) in question; other types of non-free use tend to be much harder to justify (see WP:NFC#cite_note-3). So, if you intend to use the file for primary identification purposes, just make sure when upload it that you add (1) a file copyright tag and (2) a non-free use rationale to the file's page, and then add the file to the article you want to use it in. For album/single cover art, the copyright tag Template:Non-free album cover and the non-free use rationale Template:Non-free use rationale album cover are often used; just complete the parameters of the non-free use rationale template as best as you can. It's important to make sure that the file has both a copyright license and a non-free use rationale because files missing one or the other are subject to speedy deletion. If you've any more specific questions, you can ask for help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. If you read through everything and still don't feel comfortable trying to upload the file yourself, you can try Wikipedia:Files for upload. That page is geared more to users such as IP accounts which cannot upload files themselves, but someone might be willing to help you out. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Minimum age

Helped

Someone made this undo They dont say why. I don't see why. They can't say why? Why? -ApexUnderground (talk) 05:57, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

@ApexUnderground: Hi and welcome to the Teahouse! Another user will elaborate on this but for now see Talk:Minimum age. OkayKenG (talk) 06:33, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

That's where there's the "why" your edit was done OkayKenG (talk) 06:39, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi

Can you send me pictures of high heel boots to my phone number please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beastcjb (talk • contribs) 19:45, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

@Beastcjb: Sorry, this is not what this forum is for. Interstellarity T 🌟 19:47, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Though, for what it's worth, there are some pictures of high heeled boots (among other high heeled shoes) on Commons. Eman235/talk 19:50, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Joüche Paldakvieko (talk) 08:36, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

How do I find a list of all uses of an infobox template?

Helped

Specifically this one. I want to see the kind if articles it is used on currently before using it on another page. Cambial Yellowing(❧) 13:05, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to the Teahouse, Cambial Yellowing. Every page has a "What links here" link which you can find on the left hand tool bar in desktop view. Here is what links to it. I think your approach is a very sensible one: see how something is used elsewhere before deploying it yourself. Best wishes, Nick Moyes (talk) 13:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

That was fast! Thank you. Cambial Yellowing(❧) 13:28, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Previous Songs

Helped If an artist released two singles on the same date, on the article of one of the singles do we put the other single released on the same date as the previous single or the next single, or neither? Billiekhalidfan (talk) 12:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Billiekhalidfan (talk · contribs) If you're asking about older formats (with an A and B side, like vinyl), then the A side was listed first and the B side second. If you're talking about digital releases, the Songs WikiProject is probably the best place to ask: WP:WikiProject Songs. The group of editors there is quite involved in music entries on Wikipedia and may already have come to a consensus on what should be done in that instance. Happy editing! Orville^talk 15:14, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Naming the rose breeder

Helped

I am working on a draft on rose breeder, Tom Carruth. Most of the references list him as "Tom Carruth" and one reference lists him as "Thomas Carruth". I believe that anyone searching for info on Carruth would be using "Tom Carruth". When I finish my draft, should I create article "Tom Carruth" or "Thomas Carruth"? I know that I can create a redirect with the alternate name. thx MauraWen (talk) 15:39, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi @MauraWen: per WP:COMMONNAME you should use Tom Carruth. Additionally, as you've pointed out, a redirect from Thomas Carruth to Tom Carruth will help anyone looking for the full version of his name find the correct article. Orville^talk 15:46, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! @Orville: MauraWen (talk) 17:18, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Question about speedy deletion of a recent post

Helped

Hi, I am new to Wikipedia contribution and the first article created by me on O2Rise Packaged Mineral Water was nominatied for speedy deletion and subsequently deleted. I am unable to understand the reason for the same and would love any help I can get regarding the same. The article was written purely from my research that did involve talking to the owners of the company. However, I am in no way associated with the company or being compensated for the work done. It was made with the intention of information sharing of a company in a concentrated market space of Mumbai.

Please advise me on the same. Thank you. --ShipraBaxiEAO (talk) 07:16, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello ShipraBaxiEAO, welcome to Wikipedia! The deletion nomination and the deletion action both leave reasons for why that happened. For example, you have two separate messages on your talk page about what might have gone wrong. If you have no conflict of interest (see WP:COI) as they suspected you might have, just denying it is enough. But your content still needs to meet the neutral point of view criterion, See WP:NPOV. The other reason was lack of demonstrated notability. That means you failed to show in the article why the subject was important enough to deserve a page in wikipedia. See WP:GNG for what notability means here in Wikipedia. Also, original research can not be a basis for content on Wikipedia (See WP:OR), the information has to be independently verifiable (See WP:Verifiability). The way to achieve that is to cite your content with independent reliable sources (See WP:RS). I wouldn't usually drown you out in so many policies right at the outset but you say you are a curious learner, so I expect it will help rather than put you off. Good luck! Usedtobecool ^✉️ ✨ 07:59, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Hi ShipraBaxiEAO, and welcome to the Teahouse. I can't see the article that was deleted, but the reasons were advertising style and questionable notability. I suppose it is difficult for a marketing person to write in an encyclopaedic rather than a marketing style, but the best process for writing a Wikipedia article is to forget what you already know, and ignore the website and publicity of the organisation you are writing about. You need to find independent WP:Reliable sources in which the subject has been written about in detail, and summarise in your own words what these sources say. Google doesn't find suitable sources for me, but perhaps that's because I live in a different country. Dbfirs 08:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, ShipraBaxiEAO. I am an administrator and so I just reviewed the deleted article which said, "the company aimed to revolutionize the packaged drinking water in India by incorporating state-of-art maunfacturing and treatment systems". The reference for that was an interview with a company executive, which is not an independent source. In this context (bottled water), phrases like "revolutionize" and "state-of-art" are not encyclopedic but are nothing more than empty marketing jargon. Wikipedia is not a marketing platform. Please read Your first article.Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:51, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

pseudonyms in citations

When citing a book, if it was published under a pseudonym ("A Virginian"), but you know the author's real name and want to include it, how is this best handled? Thank you. deisenbe (talk) 10:25, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

One way to do it could be to type the pseudonym, followed by the author's real name in brackets. For example Lemony Snicket (Daniel Handler). WikiSmartLife (talk) 12:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

The you know the author's real name bit could be potentially problematic, I reckon. Would need to be properly cited. Usedtobecool ^✉️ ✨ 12:10, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

@WikiSmartLife:, I need to put it in a citation, {{cite-book}} or something similar. deisenbe (talk) 21:27, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

speedy deletion for my own writing called copyright infringement

Can you help me? My new Wikipedia page for my father, Patrick McArdle, was deleted before I could explain that I had written the bios for both linked galleries and in addition that I am the owner of the photograph. I have not created an article in several years and realize now that I should have done this in the sandbox as it was not complete (needed more sources)Also, how do I contact user Sphilbrick who deleted it to explain? Thanks in advance. Mildred Jirak (aka Deirdre McArdle)

Hello and welcome, MildredJirak! To you first question, if you are the owner of the text here [2] and would like to copy it verbatim into a Wikipedia article you will need to first release it by following the instructions at WP:CONSENT. Until you do that you'll probably find it will be repeatedly deleted regardless of any explanations. To your second question, to contact Sphilbrick click here and leave a message on their Talk page. Again, however, this does not remove your need to follow the instructions at CONSENT in order to have your content released to Wikipedia. Chetsford (talk) 23:05, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

But if you tried to make an article based just (or mainly) on that site, MildredJirak, I don't think it would be accepted, as the bulk of an article should be based on sources independent of the subject. --ColinFine (talk) 23:15, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your help. I will rewrite the text as you recommend. The article will be based on newspaper articles and reviews. Is it acceptable to include these links to current galleries, after I have rewritten my text, and the artist's website?MildredJirak (talk) 00:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi, MildredJirak. If you can find sufficient independent sources to establish notability and make an article, then a link to the artist's website should definitely be included, but probably not to galleries - see external links for the policy. You still need to take note of the instructions on COI editing. --ColinFine (talk) 09:03, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

I'm happy to talk to you further if you want to contact me on my talk page , but I will have discouraging news. Chetsford Gave you good advice on the steps to take to solve copyright problem, but even if that problem is cured, that is the problem of whether the text you wrote was adequately supported by links to published, reliable sources. Perhaps it was, I've worked on a lot of copyright issues and honestly don't recall the one you mention, but if it did not contain links to reliable sources that will be a problem even if the copyright issue is resolved.S Philbrick(Talk) 01:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you everyone for your advice. Sphilbrick, I am a neophyte and though I can go to your Talk page, I can't figure out how to write to you as I only see other conversations. Though he is not included in an ISBN book, the material in McArdle's bio can be supported with newspaper and magazine articles and Museum catalog listings. I will rewrite the text and footnote. Should I do my work on this article in the Sandbox or at another location? In other words can I 'create article Patrick McArdle' or since it was deleted will I be denied? MildredJirak (talk) 00:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi @MildredJirak: Adding a message to a talk page takes a few steps:

1. Click here-> User talk:Sphilbrick
2. Then click the new section tab
3. Enter a title above the line that looks like t he one below (maybe call it Patrick McArdle article help request):

   ---

4. Below the line, enter whatever you'd like to say, ask Sphilbrook to ping you when they respond, and add 4 of these: ~ at the end to sign your message
5. Click the publish changes button and your comments will be added to S Philbrick's talkpage
6. When you get a notice, return to S Philbrook's talkpage (a link will be in the notice) to see their response. Orville^talk 00:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Texas' congressional districts edits help

Helped
Hi. I am trying to make well-intended moves on Texas' congressional district's pages: Texas already ends with the letter S, so we don't need the extra S after the S in the name Texas (The same could be said of the States of Arkansas and Kansas). I have succeeded in moving the pages of Texas congressional Districts one and twelve. I have been giving the following reason: "Since the name of the State of Texas ends with the letter S, we don't need the extra apostrophe after the last letter; it is redundant". I have been bloked automatically from making other moves. May someone help me make these moves? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joesom222 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Joesom222: Our style guide does not always match what you may be used to seeing. Per MOS:POSS "For the possessive of singular nouns, including proper names and words ending with an s, add 's". So, per our style guide, it should be Texas's 1st congressional district since it's a proper name that ends with s and we are adding 's to convert it to a possessive. Orville^talk 02:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Question about 'notability'

I recently noticed that a Wikipedia page for Swiggy doesn't exist. Swiggy, as any Indian editors here may know, is one of the most popular tech startups in the country and is one of the very few unicorn startups from here.

Upon a request for inclusion, I was told that the page is not notable. I am curious why this is the case when there exist Wikipedia page for several other companies operating in this space, including that of Zomato, a rival startup in the same space in India (with more or less the same valuation).

Here is a list of Wiki pages of its competitors

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zomato https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deliveroo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DoorDash https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GrubHub https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UberEATS

What's interesting is that some of these companies are much smaller than Swiggy and are still considered notable. For instance, Deliveroo's valuation is $2 billion whereas Swiggy is valued at more than $3.3 billion

https://techcrunch.com/2019/05/16/amazon-takes-a-bite-into-deliveroo/ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/newsbuzz/with-1-b-new-money-and-3-3-b-valuation-swiggy-turns-swaggy/articleshow/67186809.cms?from=mdr

Xooxwiki (talk) 03:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Xooxwiki. From anecdotal experience I can see Swiggy is getting popular in the Indian market, but Wikipedia cares about reliable sources and that seems to be the reason for a November 2016 discussion leading to its deletion. The facts have likely changed since then, but the ET article you listed is about Swiggy's fundraising, so I'd hesitate to say you should recreate the page using it at the source, because the arguments in favour of the earlier deletion mentioned that fundraising by itself wouldn't produce the kind of coverage needed for notability. Perhaps some more effort towards finding coverage of Swiggy in terms of functionality, consumer adoption etc. would help make a strong case for recreating the article. Airbornemihir (talk) 03:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Three years is a long time. I conducted a quick google news search and think the coverage in June 2019 alone would suffice for notability here. No doubt it'll stick if it's written properly. Usedtobecool ^✉️ ✨ 04:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

How can I fix my image that was sandwiching text?

Helped
Hello! So on the Austria page, I added an image to the Etymology section that was removed for sandwiching the text. Here is the version of the page with the image I added. I thought maybe I could align it to the right instead, but there's a text box there and that makes the image appear way down below. Could someone help me properly implement the image onto the page? Thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjooru (talk • contribs) 05:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Kjooru: I've centered the image below the etymology section to prevent sandwiching the text. Orville^talk 05:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Kjooru (talk) 06:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi

Someone help me please! I need help on Big Sand Reference! Hurricane Ducker (talk) 15:26, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

I've fixed it- unfortunately I can't tell anything else because Chrome is blocking the website. Do you use wikisource or Visual Editor? -A lad insane (Channel 2) 15:37, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks very much. I use normal editor. Hurricane Ducker (talk) 07:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Remove fbclid=... from all links

Helped
Hi all,

I happened to notice that hundreds of links in hundreds of articles include fbclid=longstringofrandomlookingletters parameters. According to what I read, Facebook adds these to track users' browsing behavior. It works like this:

• Let's assume I discover something on www.example.com/cooltopic.html and share this URL with a friend on Facebook: "HEY CHEK THIS OUT!!!!!!!11"
• Facebook automatically adds a unique FaceBook CLick ID (fbclid) to every link that is passed through them by adding &fbclid=... or ?fbclid=... to it. This doesn't change the destination of the link i.e. the URL still works the same.
• The friend decides to add my URL as a reference/link to Wikipedia. Except, now the URL will read www.example.com/cooltopic.html?fbclid=xyz123.
• Thanks to their Click ID Facebook can now track the URL: If the link is emailed to a 3rd person, who sends it to a 4th via Whatsapp, Facebook recognizes the (modified) link as the one I originally shared with my friend, thus gathering data about which persons are communicating with whom.
• If the destination site of the link (example.com) has added a like-button to their page then Facebook even gets notified whenever anyone follows the link, i.e. they will know exactly which visits to www.example.com are a consequence of my original communication with my friend. (They use this to find out who is a valuable influencer.)

Long story short, IMHO all fbclid=... should be deleted from all (current and future) references and links on Wikipedia, because

• Facebook has no business tracking Wikipedia contributors or readers.
• The huge fbclid=... strings make references harder to read and edit.
• The fact that an Wikipedia article's reference's URL was passed through Facebook's infrastructure earlier is not relevant to the topic the article covers, so this information need not be preserved.
• The links work just the same after deleting the fbclid parameter.

So it would be great if some Wikipedia wizard could program and unleash a bot for this? Please?? Supposedly there are also Google Click IDs and others, however I haven't found their 'additions' in links. Maybe there is already a bot in place filtering them out? Then this bot would just need a little expanding.

I didn't know where to ask. Do bot wizards hang around in the Teahouse? Most actual programmers I know drink obscene amounts of coffee instead. ;-)

Thanks and regards, Jens (84.173.225.148 (talk) 19:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC))

Hello IP editor Jens. I think that Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) is a better place for this discussion. All the code monkeys and cool nerds hang out there. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Many thanks for the pointer. --Jens (84.173.225.148 (talk) 20:19, 30 June 2019 (UTC))

There's also a page Wikipedia:Bot requests which may be used to request automated works (although this one probably needs a broader discussion before being implemented, so Village Pump looks the better choice in this case). --CiaPan (talk) 07:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Protection for 2019 Pacific hurricane season

Hello, could I please request that the 2019 Pacific hurricane season to be protected. Vandals and a major hurricane expected, to stop more vandalism. Thanks..Hurricane Ducker (talk) 07:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Also a disruptive user who may need blocking. (User:86.144.116.147)..Hurricane Ducker (talk) 08:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I think this is where you request that. Have a look. Also, look at Wikipedia:Twinkle about a gadget that can be used to do it more easily.Usedtobecool ^✉️ ✨ 08:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Dinawan Island

I edited the entry for Dinawan Island, and it was deleted for being "not constructive."

Here is the original entry, before editing: The Dinawan Island (Malay: Pulau Dinawan) is a Malaysian island located in the West Coast on the state of Sabah. It is located about 3.5 kilometres from Kimanis in the extension of the Kimanis River and about 20 kilometres on the southwest of Kota Kinabalu. It is 73 m high and surrounded by reefs and sandbanks.[1] The private owner operates a tourist resort on the island.[2]

I added this: The island was populated by natives prior to WWII. In WWII, Japanese forces slaughtered the entire male population of the island, while the women and children were forcibly moved elsewhere. <https://listverse.com/2015/11/16/10-horrific-atrocities-committed-by-japans-secret-police-in-world-war-ii/?utm_source=more&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=direct>

It was deleted for being "not constructive."

I re-posted, and added this: To the editors: The above entry was removed because it was deemed "not constructive." How is it not constructive? It constructs more of the history of the island. It adds to the sum of knowledge. It also explains why the island is now a private resort; because it was colonized and ethnically cleansed by the Japanese, who went on to lose WWII, and were forced to abandon the island. It is absolutely constructive. History is not always positive or "constructive;" it is sometimes horrible. But it is history, and fact...

Wikipedia wants facts, correct? Or do they want to construct a false version of history?

That was called "vandalism."

What is the deal folks? Are we building history one piece at a time or not? I'm honestly puzzled.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.196.29.166 (talk) 16:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

FYI: Dinawan Island. The place to discuss article changes is the Talk page of the article. The link you provided does document the WWII atrocity, but it should become a reference, not in the text of the article. You can also go to the talk page of the two editors who removed the content and ask why it was done. Neither deemed it vandalism. David notMD (talk) 16:29, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Respectfully: The below seems to refer to "vandalism."

Latest revision as of 15:36, 30 June 2019 June 2019 Information icon Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dinawan Island have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 00:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dinawan Island. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:36, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dinawan Island. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 15:36, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Look, I'm a 55 year old guy not too familiar with all this tech. I just tried to add to the historical record. Perhaps those of you more tech-savvy than us old military guys can get this handled!

Thanks, Respectfully and best wishes, Mike SKinner skinnerjm at cox dot net — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.196.29.166 (talk) 18:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

I was surprised that two editors posted a statement on your Talk page identifying your changes as vandalism. In my opinion, more of 'good faith' edits with a ref in the wrong format. I added text and a properly formatted ref. Perhaps that will stick. David notMD (talk) 13:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

BOF

I want to add to the entry for BOF under 'Other meanings' BOF has the meaning "Boring Old Fart" (a Senior Citizen or OAP, of which I am one). How do I add this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RusticTim (talk • contribs) 10:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

@RusticTim: Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. Is there an article about 'boring old fart' supported with independent reliable sources? If not, then it should not be included. BoF is what we call a disambiguation page, which should only list subjects that have articles with similar titles or abbreviations(in this case). 331dot (talk) 10:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

BTW, 331dot, does the above mean that the link to a non-existent page Bof… Anatomie d'un livreur should be removed from the BoF dismbig...? --CiaPan (talk) 11:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Unless there is a prospect of it being an article, that would be my opinion. 331dot (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Per the Disambiguation dos and don'ts a red link entry is acceptable if it contains a blue link that mentions the term being disambiguated. Which it now does for Bof… Anatomie d'un livreur. Gab4gab (talk) 15:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Hows the environment of Bay mills Indian Community?

Hows the environment of Bay mills Indian Community? Is there any law to protect the environment of reservation in Bay mills Indian Community? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaxsmu (talk • contribs) 16:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Zaxsmu: Details are here: Bay Mills Indian Community#Environment. In the future, you can just type what you're looking for in the search box. Orville^talk 17:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Why do some pages have to have a lock when you want to edit something Because I’m upset

It’s about the numberblocks and it raises a concern because of repeated vandalism has caused A block to be used. It makes me upset and I want it changed back because I’m Autistic and I really hate changes like editing locks please help with advice I will need sinebot to sign this because I don’t know my name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.6.231.188 (talk) 18:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

You can use edit requests when a page is protected. (Also, you don't need to know your name to sign posts; just type ~~~~ after your comment.) Eman235/talk 18:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Ok but can you put this on my talk page where I can remember it also thank you for the help 92.6.231.188 (talk) 92.6.231.188 —Preceding undated comment added 18:43, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

 Done Eman235/talk 18:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

methylsalicylate

On the page for methyl salicylate the stick structure does not show the CH3 group. Why not? The space filling models both indicate the presence of a methyl group. Pages for toluene and tetramethylsilane, for example show the presence of CH3 groups specifically. As a chemist, I think the CH3 group should be added to the structure. Let me know if I can help. Dick Holroyd — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.75.200.173 (talk) 20:47, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi IP, I would suggest raising this question on the relevant talk page, Talk:Methyl salicylate, as that way you'll be able to discuss this with editors who are actively involved in editing that page. If no one responds there, you can consider going ahead and making the change yourself, or raising it on a Wikiproject talk page like Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals to get the attention of other editors who may be able to help. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:52, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

There are three structure diagrams at the top of the infobox for Methyl salicylate. They all show the methyl group. Maproom (talk) 22:11, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

It looks like it's a matter of convention of different sources. Some sources, like CAS and Comptox/EPA, show a methyl group explicitly when it's on the end of a chain, while others, like PubChem and ChemSpider, do not. See hexane for examples (I realize this is different, but explicit methyl groups at CAS and Comptox/EPA in the simple case of hexane are shown when there is no reason to show them). For other compounds, Wikipedia seems to generally prefer the simpler stick diagrams that do not show the methyl groups explicitly (e.g. ester), though some of the diagrams at Commons do have them. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 21:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Palmyra, New York

Article mentions Palmyra, NY as the only U.S. location of 4 churches, 4 corners. Where are the other 9, in the world? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:1013:C2E:A082:13DE:E8BF:2B24 (talk) 20:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Good question, IP editor. I dont know the answer, but have now labelled the unresponsive url in one citation as a , and marked the statement you question with a notice. Regards Nick Moyes (talk) 22:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Vandalism revert

Hello! As I currently don’t have rollback rights, would someone be able to revert the three vandalism additions on Louisa Johnson? Thanks in advance! – DarkGlow (talk) 22:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

@DarkGlow: Welcome to the Teahouse! Thanks for notifying, looks like Schazjmd took care of that. Schazjmd also left a message on your talk page you might want to read. OkayKenG (talk) 22:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)