Talk:Minimum age

≠

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles

Politics

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles

Philosophy

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

This redirect was nominated for deletion on 30 July 2014. The result of the discussion was keep.

Recent removal of redirect

ApexUnderground, as seen here, here, and here, what to do with this redirect has been discussed. To challenge that, you should take the matter to WP:Redirects for discussion. Pinging Thryduulf and JamesBWatson for their thoughts. The JMJimmy account no longer edits. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:34, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Flyer22 Reborn, my editing of this page was almost five and a half years ago, and I don't have any memory of it. However, at that time I did say, You can play al fornait only at the age of 18, such vaiolens, such distrokchion. And remember, Free Fire is god demn bull sheet.

LuchMaster69 subscribe now in an edit summary, "It is completely litly redundant to Legal age (disambiguation)", and that is even more so of the version created recently by ApexUnderground (apart from the fact that Legal age (disambiguation) has been moved to Legal age), as the new version of Minimum age was another disambiguation page, very similar to Legal age, and with overlap in content. Having two disambiguation pages doing essentially the same job is very unhelpful, as it leads to difficulty in keeping track of changes, and a likelihood that improvements that take make place on one page will be missed on the other. There may be a case for changing the redirect target to the existing disambiguation page, but there is none at all for making the redirect age into a second, redundant, disambiguation page. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:19, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a comment, @Flyer22 Reborn:, ApexUnderground over at the Wikipedia:Teahouse asked why their edit was undone in this edit. Linked to here. (maybe the ping did not work?) OkayKenG (talk) 06:46, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree minimum age should redirect to legal age dismabiguation. -ApexUnderground (talk) 07:21, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! ~~Before its asked I recommend writing why it should be that way.~~ :)OkayKenG (talk) 08:07, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't be opposed to this term redirecting to the Legal age page, but I still think that this matter should go to WP:Redirects for discussion for that decision. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 11:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]