Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Bunch of userfication requests from Neustradamas
I put this long indiscriminate list in the right place. Am discussing with requester what he wants to do with them all as its a long indiscriminate list that will take a lot of time to fulfil. Spartaz Humbug! 20:12, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Not done see discussion on requester's talkpage Spartaz Humbug! 06:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
deleted as advertising? I think
Please tell me what I have done wrong the page that I included the article in was for Recording `studios in London" I thought it was ok to name my own studio here/ I am sorry if this breaks rules I saw all the other studios mentioned and added mine? many thanks Phil
- Not done. Wikipedia isn't a place to advertise. Spartaz Humbug! 11:06, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Spartaz you do not address his objection. He is saying that all other studios have their page on Wikipedia. If true, this would put Wikipedia's fairness and credibility into question. ShereKhan92.251.70.39 (talk) 19:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- WP:OTHERSTUFF addresses this issue.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Yes, but unconvincingly. Sherekhan 92.251.70.39 (talk) 14:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
PetGadgets
Hello I'm hoping you can release our PetGadgets article posting availability. A few years ago we had an untrained worker who did not adhere to the Wiki rules and thus the article was flagged as promotion. We just want to have the ability to update our company info. We have started a new one under the user name http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kozmoscorner which is what we would like to be put on or moved to the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PetGadgets url . Thanks for your help on this matter. I look forward to hearing from you. Geoff, President PetGadgets.com
The draft article does not currently pass WP:CORP notability standards. Are there any reliable, independent secondary sources that have written about your company? –Xeno(talk) 14:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Xeno, Thanks for your reply. Yes, are site is continually mentioned by the mainstream media both in print and on-air. Here is just a partial listing of all the top places that have discussed our site from NBC's PetSide, Readers Digest, MSNBC, CNET, The Early Show on CBS, Fox & Friends, Digital Trends, ABC News Now, Pet Product News which is considered the pet industry bible.
Below are some links:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23674521/#storyContinued
http://www.foxnews.com/search-results/m/24237614/pet-gadgets.htm#q=pet
http://www.petside.com/bowl-and-collar/top_10_pet_gadget_gifts.php
http://www.petgadgets.com/news/PetGadgetsPetProductNews.cfm
http://www.petgadgets.com/news/abcworldnews.cfm
http://podcasts.digitaltrends.com/podcast/273/gadgets-and-technology-for-dogs
- You'll need to add these references to the article and also make some assertion of notability. If you think your article meets WP:CORP standards, you can then move it into the mainspace - however; this will not prevent another editor tagging it for speedy deletion or filing a deletion discussion if they feel it still does not meet our inclusion criteria. –xenotalk 17:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
No action needed - page was not salted. –xenotalk 19:43, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
The article on local Syracuse, NY band "One Last Shot" has been deleted despite it being factually based and used as a resource on the bands website as a place to go to learn about the band. There were no facts on the page that we wrong, inappropriate, or frivolous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.106.202.197 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 4 January 2010
Done As the article was deleted by the Proposed Deletion procedure, restoration on request is automatic. I'm not sure the "history" section qualifies as "not frivolous", but that's by the way: the point is that just being correct is not enough, to have a Wikipedia article a subject has to be notable, the standard for bands is set out at WP:BAND, and I'm afraid, with their first EP yet to be released, One Last Shot don't make it (yet). So I have started a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Last Shot. These discussions normally run for seven days; you are welcome to comment there, but before you do, please read WP:Notability and WP:Notability (music). JohnCD (talk) 20:44, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
I would like to Request that the article Shaun Rogerson is moved to User:Sfxprefects/Shaun_Rogerson2 so i can improved the article thanks Sfxprefects (talk) 19:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Done since you already have the nearly-identical User:Sfxprefects/Shaun Rogerson, but I must warn you that I think you are flogging a dead horse here. This has already been deleted five times and has been through Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Rogerson. If you reintroduce it, it will be speedy-deleted WP:CSD#G4 unless something dramatic has happened to mean that he meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:ENTERTAINER. Just adding a few more local newspaper references is not going to save it. JohnCD (talk) 12:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
This article concerns a well known painter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandre GASTAUD (talk • contribs) 06:24, 5 January 2010
- The article gave no indication that he was notable in Wikipedia's sense, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Can you provide independent references? JohnCD (talk) 12:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Here are some links: Artprice auction records, AskArt auction records, Critic 1, Critic 2 (in french)--Alexandre GASTAUD (talk) 13:25, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Done I have restored it and marked it "under construction" which will protect it for a few days while you add references. These may save it from speedy deletion, but I'm not sure they are enough to save it at an WP:Articles for deletion debate: if you can find more, it will help. The standard you are aiming for is WP:CREATIVE. JohnCD (talk) 22:45, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
The article pertained to a National Bravery Award winner in India who is perhaps one of few Indians to win both the Bravery Awards viz. Prime Minster's National Bravery Award and President of India's Jeevan Raksha Medal.
Links to all newspaper articles were also provided. I would hence be interested to knwo why the page was deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkalyanpur (talk • contribs) 10:53, 5 January 2010
- Not done The article was deleted as a result of a deletion debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanmesh Kalyanpur. If you want to challenge that decision, you should take it to WP:Deletion review. If you are related to the subject, please read WP:Conflict of Interest. JohnCD (talk) 11:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- I should have added that your first step should be to approach JForget (talk · contribs), the administrator who closed the deletion debate, and invite him to reconsider his decision. If he is not willing to do that, then you should go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
The page User:RedPolly/Etersoft was created as a draft. The name of the page "User:Redpolly/..." is an analog to the "Special:MyPage/..." in Russian Wikipedia. So the page was in development, but I haven't saved the copy. So I'd like to ask if the text of this article can be restored as Special:MyPage/Etersoft.
- Not done. User:RedPolly/Etersoft is quite correct for the name of a user sub-page - "Special:MyPage/Etersoft" is just a shortcut to get the same result. But that subpage was deleted per WP:CSD#G11 as an advertisement, which is not permitted even in user space. If you want it back, you should talk to Lectonar (talk · contribs), the admin who deleted it. JohnCD (talk) 17:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Could an administrator restore the old deleted page history? The article was deleted in 2007 after an AfD, and has now been recreated with sources showing notability. --Apoc2400 (talk) 14:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
The article above was a concise and complete description of a long running, internationally broadcast television program. I cannot understand why the article was deleted, nor do I agree with it being done.
17:55, 21 December 2009 MrKIA11 (talk | contribs) deleted "MoneyTV with Donald Baillargeon" (Expired PROD, concern was: No indication this meets the general notability guideline or the notability criteria for organizations and companies.)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbmedia (talk • contribs)
- Done The article was deleted under the WP:Proposed deletion process, so is automatically restored on request. I will notify the editor who PRODded it, in case he wishes to nominate it under the WP:Articles for deletion process. JohnCD (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
New Raven Clan
I will like to edit it more because this is my first time using this. and i also dont have a saved copy. Please Help—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ogan 234 (talk • contribs)
- The article was deleted under speedy criteria A7, which is not an article we can unilaterally restore here. Since you don't have an email address, we can't email you a copy. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
KINDERDANCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Hi. My name is Darlene. Could you please undelete Kinderdance International, Inc.? All information was out of Essence Magazine and Entrepreneur magazine. We also took off the link to Wikepedia on our website. What else do we need to change in order to be reposted? Thank you for your help. You can reach me at: darlenevanderwal@kinderdance.com
Warm regards, Darlene—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nuncscio (talk • contribs)
- The article was deleted as a result of the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinderdance International Inc, so we can't unilaterally restore it here. You already have a copy at User:Nuncscio/Kinderdance International Inc, so your best bet is to make changes that you think will address the objections brought up at the deletion discussion, then post a request for feedback at WP:FEED. HTH. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
I am the global manager of the band "our mountain, I need this page undeleted for overall awareness purposes, I am confused as to why it was deleted in the first place? Please help.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Myrtles (talk • contribs)
- For the deletion reason, you might talk to Deb (talk · contribs), the deleting admin. While it's a bit of a judgment call whether the article met the speedy deletion criteria or not, I can't find evidence in the article or through a google search that the band meets the requirements of WP:MUSIC.
- Since you are the manager of the band, you have a conflict of interest in writing this article. Wikipedia strongly discourages working on articles where you have a conflict of interest, as most humans have an extremely hard time writing unbiased material in that situation (and an even harder time recognizing that their writing is biased). Music is extremely well represented on Wikipedia -- wait until the band meets the requirements of WP:MUSIC and someone will surely write a new article. However, Wikipedia is not the place "for overall awareness purposes" -- myspace, facebook, and your own website are ideal places for that. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
this is not a un-notable reporter. she is the 6:00 news anchor and regional celebrity.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.190.154.116 (talk • contribs)
- Done I've restored Lin Sue Cooney as a contested prod. However, the sources in the article don't currently meet the requirements of WP:BIO. Take a few minutes to read WP:BIO and WP:RS to get a feel for what the article needs -- if sources aren't added soon, it could easily end up at articles for deletion.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
This book is cited as "The Scented Garden of Abdullah the Satirist of Shiraz" in the article Works of Aleister Crowley at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Works_of_Aleister_Crowley#Poetry -- therefore it should not be redirected.0XQ (talk) 21:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- The page is not currently deleted, so this is the wrong venue. Make your arguments at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion#Bagh-i-Muattar. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
this page will be used to help direct people who will be donating funds to the American Cancer Society through the purchase of Oscar Stuttgens new single—Preceding unsigned comment added by Akariverdancer (talk • contribs)
- Wikipedia is not the place to promote items for sale, even when the proceeds go to a good cause. Facebook, myspace, and private webhosts are great places for that.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Unitarian Church of Vancouver - I added a link showing relative sizes of Unitarian congregations.—Preceding unsigned comment added by MaryInVancouver (talk • contribs)
- The article is not currently deleted, just proposed for deletion. All you need to do is edit the article and remove the deletion template. However, it would be a good idea to also address the issues mentioned in the deletion proposal (WP:Notability and lack of sources independent of the subject), or the article could end up at Articles for deletion. HTH--Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:04, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
I have been attempting to locate an article that I had contributed to back in March of last year. This contribution was on an individual that I had been studying in the Jewish community of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, who is a proponent of civil rights and Russian immigrant.
I cannot seem to locate anything except for a picture that I had uploaded; I cannot even determine who the administrator was that deleted it to attempt to recover my work.
Can you please restore this article to my account so that I may attempt to satisfy the guidelines of Wikipedia?
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Jmta16 (talk) 04:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Done You could not find a record of the deletion of the article because you missed out the first "k" in the name - I have added it back to the link above. The article was deleted by the Proposed deletion process, and so is automatically restored on request. I will notify the editor who PRODded it in case s/he wishes to nominate it under the WP:Articles for deletion process. JohnCD (talk) 10:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
unfair deletion
[[:]]
That one user could not find just one link is not enough to delete such a page. She/he would like to try to fix its problem, before taking such unfair decision —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amt123 (talk • contribs) 09:13, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Please explain what particular page you are referring to. If your complaint is general, see Wikipedia:Deletion policy for how it works. JohnCD (talk) 10:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
The deletion discussion can be found here, but the most salient points were that the article lacks sources and notability. Well, I've found a few sources for it. Here are a few of them: [1] or [2], [3], [4]. Hopefully at least enough to get the article reinstated so it can be built upon. They're not the best sources in the world but hopefully enough to satisfy the notability complaints; and more will undoubtedly come along over time. I'm looking to give some love to all of the Linux-based news reader articles (Liferea is extremely well-documented in the tech press, for instance, but its wiki page lacks any web cites at all!), and it's a shame to see articles neglected this way. The addition of Newsbeuter would make a great addition to Wikipedia's coverage of news aggregators. Thanks for your consideration--Xyiyizi 19:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Since this was deleted via a deletion discussion, we can't unilaterally reinstate it here. However, we can move it to a subpage of your userpage so you can add the sources that you think will address the objections and get some feedback on it at WP:FEED. Let us know if you'd like that to happen.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:07, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- (edit conflict!) As the article was deleted at AfD, we can't just restore it without going through WP:DRV. Instead, I have restored it into the Incubator at WP:Article Incubator/Newsbeuter where you can work on it. When it is ready, in order to avoid it being tagged WP:CSD#G4 as a repost of deleted material, it would be sensible to approach the closing admin from the AfD, JForget (talk · contribs), and get his agreement to restore it to the mainspace, or alternatively to take it to DRV. JohnCD (talk) 21:12, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the assistance, chaps! I'll get right on to editing the incubator piece and make enquires to the closing admin. --Xyiyizi 21:36, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- (edit conflict!) As the article was deleted at AfD, we can't just restore it without going through WP:DRV. Instead, I have restored it into the Incubator at WP:Article Incubator/Newsbeuter where you can work on it. When it is ready, in order to avoid it being tagged WP:CSD#G4 as a repost of deleted material, it would be sensible to approach the closing admin from the AfD, JForget (talk · contribs), and get his agreement to restore it to the mainspace, or alternatively to take it to DRV. JohnCD (talk) 21:12, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
I'm writing asking the undelition of the page MULTICUBE.
MULTICUBE is a FP7 research project which relevance is thus recognized by the European Union which is funding the related activities.
Anymore, the research activities performed are today documented from many publications which number is destinated to grow with the following of the project:
http://www.multicube.eu/publications.html
The research project involves many academic institutes:
- Politecnico di Milano (Italy)
- University of Cantabria (Spain)
- Advanced Research and Learning Institute (Switzerland)
- Institute of Computing Technology (China)
And other industries and research centers:
- DS2 (Spain)
- STMicroelectronics (Italy and China)
- IMEC (Belgium)
- Esteco (Italy)
The topic is thus relevant not only from the academic point of view but also for industries. The application of related design techniques have been proved useful for speeding up the design of advanced embedded electronics. Among others activities, we developed 2 open source design tools which are today available as prototype version and will be soon (within a month) available with a more complete release.
The wikipedia page might help people on finding these tools and understanding the underlying techniques. Thus the page is useful for a wide community of engineers and students which are working on related topics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marianig (talk • contribs) 15:30, 10 January 2010
- Not done MULTICUBE was deleted as part of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MULTICUBE FP7 Project, so this isn't something we can unilaterally restore here. If you think the project meets the requirements of WP:Notability, I'd suggest writing a draft following the instructions at Wikipedia:Article Incubator. (There wasn't really any content in the prior version worth saving). This will give you more time to work on it, and let you get feedback on whether the article meets the notability requirements before moving it into the main encyclopedia. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:43, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
I've just created an aricle but it was deleted in 2 minutes and I even had no time to set references, this for example: http://www.artnet.com/artist/587815/leopoldo-romanach.html And there is a number of articles in Wiki relating this:
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C3%ADctor_Manuel_Garc%C3%ADa_Vald%C3%A9s
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=Leopoldo+Roma%C3%B1ach&go=Go
And it was deleted without any notation! Is it normal? --Ozolina (talk) 21:07, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
And look how many links about him there are in Google.--Ozolina (talk) 21:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- I've renewed the article with more information. Please be more attentive to the opinion of specialists in arts! --Ozolina (talk) 22:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Probably a better place for this would be the talk page of the person who deleted the article. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
This is a notable person and the information in this article is true and correct. I have studied from this person and she is a profound teacher and yogi with many spiritual teachings and gifts. Please do NOT delete this page—Preceding unsigned comment added by Stuffandthings7 (talk • contribs)
- The article isn't currently deleted, only proposed for deletion. All you need to do is remove the prod template at the beginning of the article (I'll do this for you). --Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
It was deleted due to an apparent lack of notability. I wish to have the article undeleted/userified(?) because Cirt suggested that I continue on a draft in my own userspace. This way, I can continue to edit it and propose it for a complete undeletion later when I feel, and hopefully Wikipedia feels, that the article is ready to be published with notable references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrjpark (talk • contribs) 03:48, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- I have restored it for you into the Article Incubator at Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Wild Pockets where you can work on it. As it was deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wild Pockets, you will need to get the consent of the deleting admin, User:Cirt, or if he does not agree take it to WP:Deletion review, before restoring it to the mainspace. JohnCD (talk) 18:46, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
sources have been added —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.58.92.84 (talk • contribs) 05:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- The article has not been deleted, and as you have removed the Proposed Deletion template there is no immediate threat of deletion, though it may be nominated at Articles for Deletion as the references do not seem to be the "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" required to establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 18:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, My page was speedily deleted before I could ask that it be placed on my user space. I recognize the errors I made and would like to have time, at my leisure to make the corrections. Please undelete the content and place it on my user space. Thanks very much, Ian Moise—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianmoise (talk • contribs)
- PeterSymonds (talk · contribs) has already done this. You'll find it at User:Ianmoise/ReUseConnection. Cheers! --Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Can someone explain to me why this article was deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.167.40.168 (talk • contribs) 13:45, 15 January 2010
- The article has not been deleted, but it has been turned into a redirect to the performer's article Bahamadia. This was done by user Live and Die 4 Hip Hop (talk · contribs), who probably thought that it did not meet the notability requirements for a standalone article explained at WP:NALBUMS, as it contained little more than a track listing and no independent comment. Read WP:NALBUMS and then discuss it with the user. JohnCD (talk) 18:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Metalmunna (talk • contribs)
- This article is not currently deleted, but a request for speedy deletion had been made. The article did not meet the speedy deletion criteria, so I declined the speedy, but the article also does not meet our criteria for inclusion, so I have proposed the article for deletion myself. You can contest the deletion by removing the prod tag from the article, but it will quickly be sent to articles for deletion. I'd suggest reading WP:NOT#ESSAY, especially number 3, to see why this article has been proposed for deletion.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Metalmunna (talk • contribs)
- Not done This "article" was simply a copy of your user page, and made no claim of anything you have done that makes you notable enough to be in an encyclopedia.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
I am not sure why this article was deleted. I am requesting information as to why it was deleted and how I can have the article undeleted.
Thank you.
Brian Graham—Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgraham14210 (talk • contribs)
- The deletion reason given was "Deleted because expired WP:PROD; Reason given: Seems to be an one-off term invented in a PowerPoint deck.. " Because this is an expired prod, you can simply request that it be undeleted here or at the deleting admin's talk page, however I strongly suggest you read WP:COI first to see why writing articles about yourself or your ideas is a really bad idea. Also, unless this concept can be shown through independent, reliable sources to be notable, it will quickly be sent to articles for deletion.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:18, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
The Voyage of the Arctic Tern is a young-adult fiction novel written completely in poetic verse in 2007. I recently created an article on it (well last Sunday), and due to finals I wasn't able to contribute much other than creating the page and writing only a sentence or two. It was deleted, most likely because it was presumed I was vandalizing, which by no means am I frustrated by. What confuses me is that the article is not showing up in my contributions history, and now that I have more time I'd like to write more about it. If someone could un-delete the article, that would have my one Wikipedia-themed dream of creating an article complete :) Kostantino888Z (talk) 20:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Because the article was deleted, it doesn't show up in your regular contribution history (but it does show up in your deleted contribution history, which admins can see.) The entire text of your article was "The Voyage of the Arctic Tern is a book written in verse, rather than the usual prose.", and it was deleted under speedy deletion criteria A1, as having no context. (Personally, I disagree with the deletion, as anyone can tell it's about a book.) However, since there was also no claim of the book meeting our notability guidelines for books, it probably would have been deleted under other guidelines anyways.
- Since you'd like to expand the article, I've taken the liberty of moving it to User:Kostantino888Z/Voyage of the Arctic Tern, where you will have more, but not unlimited, time to work on it. Be sure to include some sources that show how the book is notable, and get some feedback by posting a request at WP:FEED when you think it's ready. HTH. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Ah, well the best site is from Amazon.com ([5]). Just my luck it's a rather obscure book. I believe I have it around here somewhere, though I think I donated to my local grammar school. It seems that this book's article might have to go back into the delet bin after all unfortunately, but I suppose I'll have to use the Amazon.com summary and memory as my guides. Thank you, by the way, it's always been on my list of things to do, create an article :D Kostantino888Z (talk) 04:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- I'll post a reply on your talk page, too, but it doesn't seem that obscure to me. Gnews is giving some good leads for notability.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
This item was deleted because someone said that it was not relevant or a website. Yes it is a website, but if you have a listing for collegehumor.com you should allow a listing for adasport.com.
There are dozens of other sites that do the same exact thing as collegehumor.com. If you want me to list them, I can.
I dare you to find anything similar to adasport.com.
Chuck McCarthy - not the Chuck McCarthy listed on wikipedia, even though I am more relevant to the world. Google me.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ideasbychuck (talk • contribs)
- The deletion reason was "Article about a web site, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". The article as it stood only said what the website was, and not how it was important enough to be in an encyclopedia.
- If you think that this website can meet the requirements of Wikipedia:Notability (web), then we'll be happy to move the article to a subpage of your userpage, such as User:Ideasbychuck/Adasport.com. This will give you more, but not unlimited, time to add the needed references and expand the article a bit to explain why the website is notable. Before moving it back to article space, I'd strongly suggest getting some feedback by posting a request at WP:FEED. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
I was requesting an undelete of:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobb%27s_Curve ( This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference.
- 02:19, 16 November 2005 Jaxl (talk | contribs) deleted "Cobb's Curve" (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cobb's Curve)
)
NOT THE CREATION OF A NEW PAGE
why are ya'll so full of shit on how to do things here at wiki?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.0.184.104 (talk • contribs)
- So sorry that you are clearly frustrated. Remember that we are all individual volunteers, so you are taking your frustrations out on people who had nothing to do with causing it.
- Cobb's Curve was deleted over 4 years ago as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cobb's Curve. This means it's not something we can unilaterally overturn here. However, there are several options open to you. If you think if you think the closer interpreted the debate incorrectly, normally I'd suggest you talk to the closing admin, Jaxl (talk · contribs). However, I see Jaxl has not edited for over 3 years, so that may not go too far. The next step would be to take it to deletion review.
- If you think you can add information to the article that would address the concerns brought up at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cobb's Curve, you can create a free account and we can move it to a subpage of your user page to let you add that information. Drop a note at my talk page with your user name and a link to this section if you'd like to do that, and I'll be happy to move it for you. Or, you can create a new version from scratch. (Again, you'll need an account to do this.) Adding reliable sources will be key to making sure it doesn't get deleted again. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:41, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Im Really Asking Can You Please not delete the article and reinstate this page please?
Iv'e Included Most Of The Evidence I Could Find
Can You please advise what is required for me to keep this artivle up.
HERE'S SOME LINKS OF OF PROOF :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp4e6YZLy8M - Black Entertainment Television BET
http://i48.tinypic.com/wj9kow.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rM4nKHm2Sr8 - Webster Hall WIth Cipha Sounds
http://i49.tinypic.com/mhc6yx.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygHcPVp_r3k - Wasted Remix
http://i49.tinypic.com/mhc6yx.jpg
http://www.vladtv.com/video/13914/dre-mcfly-freestyle-for-vladtvcom-unsigned/
http://i47.tinypic.com/2ih777a.jpg
http://flyestkids.wordpress.com/2008/05/24/dre-mcfly-jeff-lightyear-bio/
http://i46.tinypic.com/t62crt.jpg
http://i46.tinypic.com/2qxtjjp.jpg
http://i49.tinypic.com/708dgy.jpg (Tokyo, Japan)
http://i46.tinypic.com/2jefkj.jpg - Intercontinental Make A Wish Ball Red Carpet Miami
http://i45.tinypic.com/ok0gp3.jpg
http://www.lyricsmania.com/crackaloonie_lyrics_dre_mcfly_and_jeff_lightyear.html
http://api.myxer.com/ringtone:480944/
http://i49.tinypic.com/eit08.jpg
http://www.myspace.com/crackalooniekidz (fan base)
Everything Was Proved On My Article No FICTION i'm trying to find some proof about MTV TRL but the pictures was lost and the show was canceled . A lot was done with my article and BET and im trying to find more internet proof i provided pictures, accomplishments , magazines , Television and More. Nothing was made up and the artist has notability. I'm Begging For You To Restore This Article. Thank You , Have A Blessed Day.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.113.14.174 (talk • contribs)
- Not done This article was deleted as a result of the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dre McFly, so we can't unilaterally restore it here. You can drop a note to the deleting admin, Jayjg (talk · contribs) and discuss your new sources (but read WP:RS and WP:Notability first -- sources like youtube aren't going to be enough). If that conversation doesn't go anywhere, you can then take it to deletion review. HTH--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:46, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- And I see you've already talked to Jayjg, so DRV is your next step.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:47, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bcai388 (talk • contribs)
- Not done - the article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/iTalkBB, and has since been re-created and deleted so often that the title has been salted to prevent creation. The issue was lack of notability; if you think you can now demonstrate notability to the standard of Notability (organizations and companies), your first step should be to talk to the deleting admin, Davewild (talk · contribs), and if he does not agree take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:01, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
I would like to request that the deletion of the Online Wedding article be undone. While not quite as topical today, as it may've been at the time, this is still an issue that persists in various online communities. In fact, the issue became topical again as recently as last month when a man in Japan "married" an avatar. [6]
I have not been an active editor for quite some time, and so I may not be following precisely the correct protocol for this request. If that is the case, please accept my apologies. The Deletion policies are written in rather arcane language which did not give me a better avenue. My only other alternative was to 'be bold' and rewrite the article from scratch. This would mean not only a lot of effort on my part, but also would not recover the numerous contributions that I recall many editors making over time.
Please let me know what, if any, action will be taken. If the article is restored, I'd like to assist in relinking it to other relevant topics.
Feel free to contact me, as I've updated my email address via my Talk page. Thanks so much for your time and effort that you put into Wikipedia. I hope to be in position to better contribute to the projects in the future.ghost (talk) 04:38, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested PROD, the article is automatically restored on request. The concerns that caused the PROD included "Notability concerns, Original research only, and Unreferenced (and unreferenceable?)" Unless you are able to improve it to address those, it may well be nominated under the Articles for deletion process. JohnCD (talk) 10:54, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, The page I created just 10 days ago has been deleted :(, It is the company I work for. We (The other staff and I) intended to gradually fill in information bit by bit. Our company exists since 2007 and is steadily growing in the small wind turbine business. Please bring our page back. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Starkfuji (talk • contribs) 05:38, 19 January 2010
- Not done - the article was deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A-WING International because it did not demonstrate notability, a requirement for an article in Wikipedia, explained in more detail at Notability (organizations and companies). Also, in writing about your own company you have, from Wikipedia's point of view, a Conflict of Interest, and should carefully read that guideline and the FAQ/Organizations, in particular the sections headed:
- If you want to proceed, you should first talk to the deleting admin, Cirt (talk · contribs), and if he does not agree take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
The metal band Saint Diablo's page was deleted 12 Aug 2008 at 23:14. I have many friends who would like it undeleted especially for discography purposes since wikipedia had the most complete discography for them of any other site. It states they were deleted for the reason of "non notable band" which is pretty ignorant of the person who tagged it for deletion considering Saint Diablo HEADLINES venues all along the East coast over here. I do understand that maybe a person not living on the East coast might assume they weren't that important of a band, but here on the East, they are extremely important to their fans. No, they're not world-wide, but then again, they don't WANT to be world-wide, they love playing where they can actually be near their fans rather than on mega stages barred away from people. So again, please consider reinstating Saint Diablo's wiki page. Thank you for your time and service. ~Heath Christopher (TridentRPG@hotmail.com)
- Done. As a contested PROD, the article is restored on request. I will notify Stormbay (talk · contribs), who PRODded it, in case he wishes to nominate it under the Articles for deletion process. At a glance, I have some doubts whether the band meets Wikipedia's definition of notability, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." More detail at WP:BAND. Also, it is not Wikipedia's job to provide a discography service for fans - the band's own website or Myspace pages are available for that. JohnCD (talk) 18:24, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
I wasn't even notified about the deletion, "Patti's" is a nationally known attraction in Western Kentucky. It is a business of great importance in Kentucky. I don't see why it was deleted because of unimportance to this subject.
Please reinstate my page to Wikipedia.
Sincerely, David Corey Fletcher —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fletcherkydude (talk • contribs) 22:42, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- You were notified about the deletion request on your talk page. The article was not written in an encyclopedic tone and as far as I can tell, did not meet the requirements set out at WP:CORP. I will leave the text of the article on your talk page. –xenotalk 22:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC) Done
The page I created today has been deleted already - could you please tell me the reason for deletion? If possible could you sned me the content (even if it cannot be published on wiki again).—Preceding unsigned comment added by Lhutchinson (talk • contribs)
- RHaworth (talk · contribs) deleted it as " ({{WP:CSD#G11|G11]]: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: probably copyvio too) ". Looking at the deleted article, I'd say it was borderline, but probably the list of operating benefits put it over the edge (it reads an awfully lot like a press release or advert).
- I've moved it to User:Lhutchinson/PURASPEC, which will give you more, but not unlimited time to work on improving it. (WP:BETTER would be a really good place to get some hints on that.) When you think it's ready to move back, get some feedback by posting a request at WP:FEED. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 08:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Per request from Ringerfan23 here, please userfy the deleted (by AFD) Otis Wiley article to Ringerfan23's sandbox here. Thank you! Logged by 7 on behalf of User:Ringerfan23 -- 23:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Done --Fabrictramp | talk to me 08:10, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. 7 08:46, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Instructions: Fill out the form below. Fill out the title using the exact title of the page if possible. Filling the form out helps administators find the article quickly. Briefly state the reason you wish to have the article undeleted. Remember to remove the comment markers, . Notes: Please tell us why the article was deleted. This is not required, but it helps us process the request. You are not currently logged in. Editing this way will cause your IP address to be recorded publicly in this page's edit history. If you create an account, you can conceal your IP address and be provided with many other benefits. Messages sent to your IP can be viewed on your talk page. Please do not save test edits. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox.
68.197.16.37 (talk) 01:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Not sure what you're asking us to do, but this template would be problematic (identifying editors as very young is not always a wise thing to do). I'd suggest you start by talking to the deleting admin, Ryan Postlethwaite (talk · contribs), and then take to WP:DRV if that isn't satisfactory.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:02, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Note that this ip address is being used by banned editor User:Phuntsok2000. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:41, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
My request for undeletion was rejected - my user name 'BHS Archives' ~ stands for Bakersfield High School Archives. Part of my job is to keep track of the Wikipedia page for Bakersfield High School, someone I don't know deleted photographs and text. Please revert the page to what it looked like in november of 2009 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bakersfield_High_School&oldid=327426490 —Preceding unsigned comment added by BHS Archives (talk • contribs)
- The article has never been deleted. Some vandalism had taken place, as often happens with school articles; I have reverted it. More comments on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 09:20, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Larry Johnson (film producer) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 22:57, 20 January 2010 Jclemens (talk | contribs) deleted "Larry Johnson (film producer)" (Expired PROD, concern was: Questionable notability: unsourced BLP.) Look for Larry Johnson (film producer) on one of Wikipedia's sister projects:
- Wiktionary (free dictionary)
- Wikibooks (free textbooks)
- Wikiquote (quotations)
- Wikisource (free library)
- Wikiversity (free learning resources)
- Commons (images and media)
- Wikinews (free news source)
Larry (L.A.) Johnson's page was deleted yesterday. I wrote the original article about him and when I learned of his death today I went to amend the page and found it gone. He was nominated for an Oscar as a sound recordist on "Woodstock" (1970), worked on the "Last Waltz," directed Lee Greenwood's video, "God Bless the USA," and had a lengthy association with Neil Young, producing the movie, "Rust Never Sleeps," the albums, "Greendale," "Living with War," and the massive Young retrospective, "Archives." Please re-instate his page, his friends and family would appreciate it. I will provide any verifiable sources you need for his bio.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.21.27 (talk • contribs)
- Done - as a contested PROD, the article is restored automatically on request. I will notify user FloNight (talk · contribs), who PRODded it, in case she wishes to nominate it under the Articles for deletion process. You are welcome to improve the article by adding reliable sources for what it says to meet Wikipedia's requirement of verifiability; if you do not wish to edit the article itself, make a note of your sources on its talk page. JohnCD (talk) 09:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- See also this conversation with offer of help. JohnCD (talk) 12:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
[[:]]
Bill "Peg Pants" Beach is the article.
It has been tagged for speedy deletion because there is another Bill Beach in the English section. These are two different Bill Beach's...one from the US and one from Austrailia. Two different reasons for biography. I titled my article Bill "Peg Pants" Beach to avoid confusion.
I have tagged it to stop deletion. Please review.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonniejanern (talk • contribs)
- Looks like the speedy tag has been removed by another editor before the article was deleted. For the future, this board is for articles that have already been deleted, not articles that are tagged for deletion but not yet deleted.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:05, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Angelo Rosetta is a notable and main character on the Australian TV soap [[Home and away], their are character profiles for other Home and away main characters.—Preceding unsigned comment added by HAA Embc (talk • contribs)
- Angelo Rosetta is not deleted, it just redirects back to the main article. Your best bet is to find independent, reliable sources that show real world notability for the character, then talk with Elen of the Roads (talk · contribs), the editor who made it a redirect. (WP:FICTION would be a good read before you start.). HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Please restore this entry. I did not create it as an advertisement, I created it as a split article from the series of pages surrounding Catholic sex abuse cases. This association is rather notable, since it has gathered leading politicians from the United States and other countries, such as certain American state governors and former British PM Tony Blair for example. ADM (talk) 19:58, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Not done The article is also a copyright violation of http://www.futurechurch.org/jtcm/links.htm. Your best bet is to find independent, reliable sources that show the notability of the organization, then create a draft at the article incubator to get some feedback. That way you can avoid the promotional language of the original. HTH
- Okay, thanks, I did not realize the copyright problem, as it was not mentioned in the original motives for deletion. I will maybe try to reconstruct the page somehow without any such difficulties. ADM (talk) 20:16, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
No undelete, just a review of the deleted page.
A while back I created the SVG version of the JPEG mentioned above, and have since had a number of requests for my SVG image to be used in publication (the original author is seemingly not contactable). I marked my image as public domain when I created it but I wanted to make sure that I was allowed to do so; hopefully seeing any licences marked against the original may help with this. — cBuckley (Talk • Contribs) 22:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Licensing template was {{self2}} with parameters "GFDL-with-disclaimers" and "cc-by-2.5" . Does that help?--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks very much Fabrictramp, that should do the trick. — cBuckley (Talk • Contribs) 22:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
several
- Retroshare (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)
- Simple Instant Messenger (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)
- Serverless Instant Messenger (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)
- Talkonaut (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)
I request the "return" of theses articles on my user sub page, thanks in advance, regards — Neustradamus (✉) 20:29, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Am not sure I understand why this article is proposed for deletion. I added the source for the quote and also the reference to a source website at the end. Perhaps it's the wrong format? Am trying! This is my first time on here doing this. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiMandala (talk • contribs) 20:55, 24 January 2010
- The article has been deleted because it was a copy from this website. You must not copy material into Wikipedia unless the copyright holder has made a copyright release, which involves more than just permission to reproduce - details are in the warning message on your talk page. If you want to re-create the article in your own words, read the links from the Welcome paragraph at the top of your talk page, especially WP:Your first article, and also the guidelines on WP:Notability and WP:No original research. JohnCD (talk) 21:47, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
A person by the user name of Nuttah keeps deleting the rules of the game ONEXENO.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ONEXENO
This seems to be a very arbitrary policy, since there is NO ADVERTISING on the page and all that they delete is the rules.
Similar games such as UNO & SET have their rules on the Wikipedia See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uno_(card_game) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_(card_game)
Even Dungeons & Dragons has its rules posted. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dungeons_%26_Dragons_gameplay
Somehow, some games are not allowed to post their rules, such a Whot & ONEXENO.
This seems extremely abitrary and unjust!!!!
Ray Lauzzana rlauzzana@penrosepress.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by RLauzzana (talk • contribs) 21:45, 24 January 2010
- The article has not been deleted: what you have here is a content dispute. Don't WP:Edit war, but discuss it on the article talk page with the other editor and try to reach a WP:Consensus; if you cannot reach agreement, the next step is WP:Dispute resolution. Since you are the developer of the game, you should read the guidelines WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest. JohnCD (talk) 21:55, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
It is not a content dispute. Nuttah doesn't change any content. It is not as if we disagree about the rules. Nuttah just deletes the rules, and claims that the rules violate Wikipedia's ban on advertising, and presents him'herself as somehow representing Wikipedia. If this is true, I don't understand why UNO, SET and even Dungeons & Dragons can post their rules.
Can someone with some authority please clearly state what the policy is that applies to game rules and why some game rules are OK and others are not?
RLauzzana (talk) 21:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
The only definition of the 20/20 club on Wikipedia appears on one of the player's page who has earned the title. The 20/20 Club page has been deleted four times in the past year and a half, that should indicate the users have an interest in having the page around. Without that one reference on the player's page, I would have been totally unable to find the definition of it. A page explaining what it is, and listing the players who have been awarded it, would have been very useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.217.17.97 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 25 January 2010
- Not done - the article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20/20 Club; if you want it restored, and think you can improve it to overcome the reasons given for deletion, you should first ask the admin who closed the discussion, MBisanz (talk · contribs), and if he does not agree take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:10, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Please restore or undelete this entry, I will be updating this document, I am still coordinating with the Author of the software to validate or verify the entries on this article.
This the software project is growing and it deserves to be known to all BASIC language fans!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Deponz (talk • contribs)
- Not done - the article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Cow BASIC; if you want it restored, and think you can improve it to overcome the reasons given for deletion, you should first ask the admin who closed the discussion, Mazca (talk · contribs), and if he does not agree take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:37, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Could I get the last revision of this article and a copy-paste of its history page emailed to me? Its afd discussion and the timing of List of web based file managers's first edit make me suspicious that the latter is a recreation. —Korath (Talk) 13:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Done JohnCD (talk) 18:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. —Korath (Talk) 18:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Could you please undelete the article? The article concerns a known chemical transport model. There are some other page about these kind of models (see CALPUFF & AEROMOD, for example. Have I to improve the description and/or references with respect the first version or it is the topic the reason of the deletion? —C_carnevale (Talk) 16:03, 26 January 2010 (GMT+1)
- Done - the article was deleted under the WP:Proposed deletion process, so is restored automatically on request. The reason given for the PROD was "no evidence of notability"; you may like to review WP:Notability and see whether you can add references that show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". I will notify user RHaworth (talk · contribs), who PRODded it, in case he wishes to nominate it under the Articles for deletion process. JohnCD (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Looking for the deleted content to be posted to my talk so I may review. Thanks! —akghetto talk 17:16, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- The entire content of that file talk page was "{{Project Alaska}}". JohnCD (talk) 17:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Perfect. Thank you! —akghetto talk 18:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Portal:Border
not enough participants on the deletion diskussion -Cmmmm 16:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Not done This should be taken to WP:DRV if you disagree with the outcome of the deletion discussion. –xenotalk 14:53, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
CinErotic FilmFest
Wondering why my post was deleted. CinErotic FilmFest is a real-life annual Atlanta film festival taking place at an art gallery, and is a cultural/art event, significant in Atlanta's cultural/art scene. It's produced by 2 well known art event producers. As written, it was not overt spam or commercial. Is it possible that the User (Nytten) who deleted the article (a self-described conservative Christian) may be prejudiced against the content?}}
-Kiki ATL (talk) 16:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- It was written more like a flyer or advertisement than an encyclopedia article. It may also not meet the WP:GNG. I can userfy it if you want to try and work on it. –xenotalk 14:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Userfied per request at my talk page. –xenotalk 19:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Previous performers at The Houston Livestock Show And Rodeo
- Previous performers at The Houston Livestock Show And Rodeo • ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) • [revisions]
This shows a history of the many and varied performers of when they performed at the rodeo. I was never given a reason on why it was deleted and wasn't notified. -Hourick (talk) 23:24, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - the list was deleted as 'trivial' because of consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Previous performers at The Houston Livestock Show And Rodeo. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Forgiven Rival
- Resolved
I'd like to have this page undeleted or userified, so I can fix the content and restore the article to wikipedia. -Zombiepig (talk) 03:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Wishful Thinking (Australian band)
This article was deleted for non-notability, but no discussion took place. Admittedly the page was badly written, but they do pass the notability tests for bands and I'd like to fix the page and restore them to wikipedia. -Zombiepig (talk) 04:01, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- No such page? –xenotalk 14:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) although there is a redlink at Wishful thinking (disambiguation), there has never been an article with that title. Can you give an exact title, or author's username, for the one you mean? JohnCD (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- My guess is that Zombiepig is refering to Wishful Thinking (band) , which redirected to Wishful, which was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wishful. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Nice detective work! Userfied to User:Zombiepig/Wishful –xenotalk 15:10, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Nice detective work!
- My guess is that Zombiepig is refering to Wishful Thinking (band) , which redirected to Wishful, which was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wishful. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) although there is a redlink at Wishful thinking (disambiguation), there has never been an article with that title. Can you give an exact title, or author's username, for the one you mean? JohnCD (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Tucson Theological Seminary
- Resolved
The original Wikipedia entry was deleted and false information was added. The information has now been corrected and should remain a part of Wikipedia. -174.18.20.181 (talk) 05:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- The article currently exists and has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tucson Theological Seminary (2nd nomination). Feel free to express your thoughts there, good luck! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 13:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)