Talk:PJIRC

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the PJIRC article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

IRC (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject IRC, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.IRCWikipedia:WikiProject IRCTemplate:WikiProject IRCIRC articles

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 June 2009. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn.

This page was proposed for deletion by JBsupreme (talk · contribs) on 18 December 2009 with the comment:
non-notable, lacking substantial and non-trivial third party coverage
It was seconded by Miami33139 (talk · contribs) on 2009-12-18
It was contested by Tothwolf (talk · contribs) on 2011-04-05 with the comment:
Multiple reliable sources were easily located. Ineligible for prod, previously discussed at AfD.

Cleaned up

I've cleaned this up some, including removing the more blatant advertising, turning the screenshot into an infobox, and adding sections which others may wish to expand. I've also taken the mention of the website rework posted by User:Plouf next to the notice of the domain lander page and incorporated it into the text of the page. Martin Blank (talk) 17:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - Website link broken

I updated the status section with some more factual facts about what's actually going on. Philippe 'Plouf' Detournay 18:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Official site link now redirects to a general IRC page

I had to add {{dead-link}} as the official site now redirects to a page that isn't directly related. Will (Talk - contribs) 13:11, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]