Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Historical/Archive 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7→Archive 10

User:Joseph Svinth

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights I contributed to some of the entries on martial arts and combative sports, and the entries on wrestling and boxing get abused. Joseph Svinth (talk) 01:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Question- Why should we give you reviewer, which is completely for trying out a script, when you fail to follow directions well enough to place a request on this page correctly? You placed it under its own section header instead of the same way as everyone else. Administrators- if you disagree please tell me. Mr. R00t Talk 03:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
{{not done}} Sorry, but you are neither an established editor nor have you indicated, and correctly for that matter, why the right would be useful to you. I think you may be looking to request the rollback right instead. -FASTILY (TALK) 05:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Please see my comments below in re: User:Ottre and reconsider. –xenotalk 13:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
On this one, I'm inclined to agree with Fastily, though if Joseph Svinth could assure us of his understanding of the policies that pending changes is trying to uphold, BLP in particular, I'd be happy to see it granted. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:14, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
The user is not particularly active but their contribution history indicates a good level of clue. –xenotalk 14:22, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Firstly, I am not thrilled to see my decline modified. Not cool. Second, I think I have already made my opinion clear on this matter. If someone still insists on granting the right, I suppose there's nothing I can do, is there? -FASTILY (TALK) 18:15, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
The template was nullified to prevent archiving while awaiting response. –xenotalk 18:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
FYI, I've initiated a thread on this question in general here: Wikipedia talk:Reviewing#On denying requests for reviewer permission. –xenotalk 15:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Based on emerging consensus [that the bar for receiving this userright should be set very low] at that thread, I have checkY granted this request. The requesting user has been contributing for years without incident, and just because the request was somewhat malformed/confused is no reason to deny granting the userright. –xenotalk 18:35, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Ottre

Long-time editor. I used to spend an hour or so each day patrolling recent changes, then moved on to new pages patrol, and now do fact-checking for around five hours per week. In regards to the recent block for edit warring, I am convinced that the ABC Television program Lateline is a discussion forum, not news, and should not be used in BLPs. This matter has not been resolved, I will challenge the block soon. Ottre 04:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
{{notdone}} You want to challenge your block for 3RR with regards to BLP? I'm sorry, but I am rather hesitant to assign the reviewer right to you. -FASTILY (TALK) 05:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Granting of the reviewer permission simple enables an explicit ability that nearly all users previously had passively - to tacitly approve (by not undoing) non-autoconfirmed edits - it should not be denied to users based on previous blocks. Please see Wikipedia talk:Reviewing#Automatic granting of "reviewer" bit, and reconsider your position. –xenotalk 13:42, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
I would have been inclined to grant this one, since the block was for 3RR (not vandalism or BLP or anything sinister), it was a month ago and the editor seems to have a sound understanding of applicable policies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:18, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Please see above. -FASTILY (TALK) 18:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Editor is not blocked. I don't see any meaningful worries in granting this. Gwen Gale (talk) 12:49, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
FYI, I've initiated a thread on this question in general here: Wikipedia talk:Reviewing#On denying requests for reviewer permission. –xenotalk 15:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Further to the above, the ANI thread [1], and the general discussion linked above, I have checkY granted the userright to Ottre. –xenotalk 18:35, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:UB65

I have added content to articles and fixed spelling, grammar and vandalism. UB65 (talk) 22:15, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 17:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Er-vet-en

Regularly editing for a year now. (around 1750 edits) Er-vet-en (say) 17:21, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Please explain your creation of The User Who Deletes This Page in January this year. ···日 本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 17:44, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Originally intended as a joke, not a very good one. Not a very innocent act either, although it is the only thing I've done to Wikipedia that can be classified as vandalism, I'm pretty apologetic about that. Spawned out as a result of melancholia while I assure it won't happen again in the future. I'm dedicaded at reverting unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, but if you feel that I don't deserve the granted right, well... Er-vet-en (say) 17:52, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:EWikist

Since joining, I have regularly contributed to various Wikipedia articles and I believe that I have good judgment as far as deciding whether something conflicts with Wikipedia's policies and standards. I've reverted any acts of vandalism that I've come across, as well as fixing grammatical errors. I feel that having Reviewer rights would better enable me to clean up vandalism on an even wider scale. EWikist (Talk to me) 18:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Meamemg

While not hugely active, I regularly monitor some articles for vandalism. I already have rollback rights. meamemg (talk) 18:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:My76Strat

I am requesting this status because I am specifically interested in becoming involved with the Wikipedia trial at Wikipedia:Pending changes. Should this trial progress to become a project of Wikipedia, I would like to continue my involvement and contribute to this project within its scope. Whereas such status may in fact impart authority beyond my experience level I assure, with the bond of my word, that I would never abuse such a trust. It would not be my intention to use this privilege beyond what is necessary to efficiently participate in this trial, unless specifically asked and obviously appropriate. My76Strat (talk) 19:54, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done, looks fine. ~ mazca talk 22:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Drpickem

I remove obvious vandalism whenever I find it, and I regularly seek out pages with poor spelling and grammar so that they can be corrected. Drpickem (talk) 21:05, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
{{not done}}- I see very little vandalism reverting in present contribs list or any warning of vandals. Plenty of editing and spellcheck is a useful contribution. Mr. R00t Talk 21:40, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done (above decline was by a non-admin) - no obvious issues I can see, user has made some decent and sensible contributions over a fairly extended period. We're deliberately being very liberal giving this right out. ~ mazca talk 22:00, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:NonvocalScream

I've alot of editing experience. NonvocalScream (talk) 22:24, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:33, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Andrewlp1991

I have been a regular editor since 2007 and rollbacker since 2009. Actively I have reverted vandalism and fact-checked Wikipedia articles over my time here. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 00:41, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 00:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Gz33

Admittedly not been I've here long but I have been very active in reverting vandalism so far. gz33 (talk) 00:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 01:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:95j

I am active in reverting vandalism, and I am a rollbacker as well. 95j (talk) 03:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done - FT2 (Talk | email) 03:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Glenfarclas

Rollbacker since November 2009 with ~12,000 edits, I regularly revert vandalism, patrol recent changes and new pages, and touch up articles when I happen across them.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 03:39, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done - FT2 (Talk | email) 03:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Raysonho

Regular contributor of multiple Wikipedia projects and media. Raysonho (talk) 03:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 04:09, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Wikitanvir

I am a rollbacker with 1000+ edits, and a vandal fighter as well. :) — Tanvir 06:37, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  09:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Dcheagle

I have been a user here for a little over a year, and have had rollback rights since August of 2009 and have used it responsibly for fighting vandalism and I believe that having Reviewer rights also will only further in helping me in the quest of fighting vandalism Steam Iron 07:03, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  09:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Bobanni

I am requesting this status because I am interested in becoming involved with the Wikipedia trial at Wikipedia:Pending changes. This process may be very useful in stopping vandalism.Bobanni (talk) 07:13, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Question: While it may seem like ancient history - can you please expain your block log and what (if anything) you would do differently. Thanks.  7  09:08, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Tcp-ip

I'm interested in this new way of patrolling pages and I think that it can improve Wikipedia. Tcp-ip (talk) 08:15, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 13:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Sevela.p

I've been long time editor. I mainly add interwikis and {{Commons category}} templates but sometimes I revert vandalism or fix typos. I'm familiar with the basic content policies. I've been administrator on the Czech Wikipedia for more than 2 years. Sevela.p 11:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  12:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Colincbn

I am interested in seeing this in action during the trial. I think this could be a great way to keep the founding principals of WP intact while still allowing extra protection on controversial or commonly vandalized pages. Colincbn (talk) 12:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 13:03, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Misarxist

Familiar with relevant policies, do some blp/vandalism reverting (most of my watchlist are blps) Misarxist (talk) 13:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 13:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:SaltyBoatr

I am a long time Wikipedia editor and I agree to contribute towards controlling vandalism and following all policies here. I volunteer to help at Wikipedia. Becoming an authorized reviewer would allow me to contribute in this way too. SaltyBoatr get wet 15:15, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 16:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Monomium

Alt account of Mono (talk · contribs) monosock 16:08, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 16:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Rahulchoudhary003

I am a regular editor in Wikipedia and pretty active in roll-backing vandalism and i want to involve in the Wikipedia trial at Wikipedia:Pending changes RahulChoudhary 17:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 19:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Pelotas

Long term contributor interested in helping out more. Although I mostly add to wikipedia, regularly I fix vandalism or correct spelling/grammar mistakes too. Pelotastalk 19:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Moxy

Think its best to have this option now with the upcoming changes Wikipedia:Pending changes. You will see by my user page i have been here a long time and also help and the various Help pages. Moxy (talk) 19:57, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Celestra

I have a long history as an editor, including servicing semi-protected edit requests, and I'd like to participate in the trial. Celestra (talk) 19:57, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:George

I've been curious to see this system implemented for some time, and I'm hopeful that it will help weed out vandalism, violations of WP:BLP, and similar issues. I've been editing for several years, focused on bringing neutrality to highly polarized, controversial topics, while removing material that falls outside of Wikipedia's principles. I'm constantly reviewing page histories for problem edits, so having another tool to help protect those pages from vandalism can only help. ← George talk 06:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Question: While it may seem like ancient history - can you please expain your block log and what (if anything) you would do differently. Thanks.  7  09:07, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Wow, I had to go archive-diving to remember what that block was about. :) I had reverted some unsourced (or poorly sourced) edits by one of Klaksonn's sock puppets, some of which I viewed as violations of BLP (for instance). We reverted back and forth, I requested protection for the page, and we were both blocked for edit warring. I requested an unblock, explaining that I thought removing the BLP violations took precedence over 3RR, but the request (and my block) expired before anyone took action on it. I lambasted the blocking admin, but really it was just a way to let off steam. What I learned from this was to not jump at every single thing I view as a policy violation; to back off, cool down, discuss the issue, and get feedback from uninvolved editors. I won't lie—I felt I was protecting Wikipedia from BLP violations and "bad" edits with my reverts—but I was edit warring, and exhibiting ownership. I've realized that if something is really a violation of Wikipedia's policies, I don't have to be the one to revert it. If I can draw attention to the issue, explain my reasoning, while weighing feedback of others, I can build consensus for changes while operating under a personal 0RR (or 1RR) policy. ← George talk 20:56, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  00:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Csigabi

I am quite familiar with flagged revisions since on my home wiki, Hungarian Wikipedia it has been in use for more than a year and a half now. I had been a reviewer from almost its introduction, until I was elected as administrator on huwiki. Recently I started to edit and fight vandalism on enwiki and I'd like to contribute to the trial. Csigabi (talk) 20:34, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Pepperpiggle

I'm a good candidate for reviewer rights because I already have rollback, I vandal fight, and I am a reliable editor. Pepper∙piggle 22:19, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done 7  23:45, 21 June 2010 (UTC)


User:WakiMiko

I have been a Wikipedian for over four years. While my edit count is modest, I try to fix spelling and grammar errors, revert vandalism and improve articles whenever I can. WakiMiko (talk) 23:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  23:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Irn

I'm active in combating vandalism and already have rollback. -- Irn (talk) 23:08, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  00:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Garyzx

I am a rollbacker with 1000+ edits. I would like to be able to mark revisions as reviewed. Garyzx (talk) 03:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done Nakon 04:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:AFBorchert

I would like to participate in the trial. I'm familiar with flagged revisions since their introduction at de-wp, have rollbacker rights and some experience in fighting vandalism at en-wp, and I am admin at Commons. I've read the relevant policies. AFBorchert (talk) 06:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  08:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Porchcrop

I am an experienced editor and have been doing helpful work on Wikipedia (e.g. vandal fighting, helping newbies, new page patrolling). I also have rollback rights. -Porchcrop (talk|contributions) 08:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  09:43, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Brews ohare

I have been an active editor on WP since 2007. Some of the images I have contributed are found here Recently I have been heavily involved in the article Pythagorean theorem. I have contributed a number of articles myself: Pole splitting, Return ratio, Signal-flow graph, Nullor, Ampere's force law and completely rewritten Step response, Current mirror, Active load, Free space, Widlar current source, Space archaeology and Value judgment, among others. Brews ohare (talk) 20:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:PRODUCER

Long time editor with 7,500+ edits ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 22:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Robyvecchio

I regularly patrol pages in my spare time for vandalism, and produced some articles myself, mainly translating them from the it wikipedia. I have never been flagged for vandalism or taken part in edit wars. I try to maintain a neutral point of view and add references whenever I can. Robyvecchio (talk) 10:06, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  11:04, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Bmclaughlin9

I've been a regular editor since August 2009 and routinely work on articles that require close attention to NPOV. I am the principal author of First Red Scare, Abbott Lawrence Lowell, Secret Court of 1920, as well as such less controversial entries as Ingolf Dahl and La marquise de Brinvilliers (opera) Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 10:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  11:04, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Stone

Chemical Elements Project has now Oxygen as a part of this trial and I want to have a look how it works Stone (talk) 12:21, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
You were already granted this right on 14 June. You might like to check your log: [2] — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Already  Done per above. —DoRD (talk) 15:28, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Chefallen

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights: I am not a very heavy editor but I add content to articles, and fix spelling, grammar and vandalism when I notice it is needed. Chefallen (talk) 13:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Ginsengbomb

Long time editor with extensive AIV, AFD, and NPP experience...basically looking for something new to do and this looks like a very appropriate way to help out the project for someone with my skills. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 14:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Tercer

I regularly edit maths articles, and am familiar with reverting vandalism. I'm interested specifically because one of the articles that interest me (Pythagorean Theorem) has been put under Pending Changes Tercer (talk) 14:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Cannonbolt2

I already have rollback rights and I feel I'm experienced enough to be trusted with this tool as well. I'm around quote often and I always edit to improve Wikipedia and protect it. Thanks :) Cannonbolt2 (talk) 14:51, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:BalticPat22

I have been an active member since October 2008. I have assisted in the improvement and expansion of various articles including, but not limited to, Fall River Line, LVMH, The Rachel Maddow Show (TV series), Céline Dion, History of MSNBC: 2008-Present, and French Canadians. My largest contributions consist of reverting vandalism creating references, and setting a neutral tone. I am applying for this position to better serve the Wikipedia community and its articles, and hope to collaborate with users who value Wikipedia as a reputable source of information as much as I do. Thank you. BalticPat22 Patrick 15:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 15:33, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:RJaguar3

As someone with rollback, reviewing seems to be perfectly complementary to the RC patrol I do from time to time. RJaguar3 | u | t 16:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 16:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:RJC

I have 3000+ edits and watch 700+ pages for vandalism. I contribute mainly to articles about political philosophers. No bans, sanctions, probation, etc. RJC TalkContribs 17:00, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done--Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:40, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Dbrodbeck

I am an active member of a couple of wikiprojects and participate quite a bit in ice hockey related articles. I also do a lot of vandalism patrolling around areas to do with autism. I do my best to keep a neutral POV and I have been a rollbacker for a few months now. Dbrodbeck (talk) 17:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done--Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Peridon

I've been editing for 2 years (8,400 edits) and work mainly in New Accounts and AfD, with quite a bit of copy-ed and advice giving on the side, and some translation work into the bargain. I don't stick to specific subject areas, but cover a very wide field of editing. I do monitor some articles that I have especial interest in. Peridon (talk) 17:46, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done--Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Peteypaws

Would like to help with the tryout. Peteypaws (talk) 17:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done, looks fine. ~ mazca talk 18:23, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. Peteypaws (talk) 18:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Joe Decker

Editing for several years, around 4000 edits, recently primarily working sourcing long-unsourced BLPs. I hadn't heard about this test but became interested in other ways of helping improve what I see as the problems of sourcing issues with BLPs. I have read and intend to reread the guideline on reviewing.. I do not currently have, nor have I requested, rollback (or other bits), few of the problematic edits I've seen required true rollback. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.j⚛e deckertalk 18:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done but please be more careful with the formatting of your signature, which I have fixed here for you. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 18:46, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, and will do. --j⚛e deckertalk 21:15, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Maria202

I've got 4 years experience with BLP issues and vandalism. One of the articles I routinely monitor and edit was just added to the test and researching that brought me here. I have rollback but I prefer to undo or revert. Maria202 (talk) 19:40, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:47, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Helohe

I have been here for quite some time. I correct the mathematics related articles from time to time. etc.. helohe (talk) 19:43, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:47, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Fortdj33

I figure this would be another way for me to help Wikipedia be as accurate as possible, by preventing vandalism and double checking links to other articles. I already use the Show Preview and Show Changes buttons extensively when I make edits, to fine tune things as much as possible before I save them. Fortdj33 (talk) 20:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Hereforhomework2

I would like to try it. I do antivandalism work and have rollback. Homework2 TalkWhat I do! 20:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:56, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Elliskev

Long time editor. I regularly check revision history. Elliskev 20:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done Nakon 20:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Wes!

Long time editor who was recently granted rollback privileges. Always happy to take the troll out of the patrol. Wes! • Tc 21:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 22:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Lukasz Lukomski

I have sysop rights on Polish wiki, I don't think my edits need much scrutiny and having reviewer rights, my edits won't need to wait for an approval Lukasz Lukomski (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done Nakon 00:39, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Magog the Ogre

I have rollback rights; I edit with an eye on content; I am familiar with policy; heck I even applied for adminship once (and failed) Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:19, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  02:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

User:SQGibbon

I am a frequent participant in RCP and spend a lot of time dealing with BLP issues SQGibbon (talk) 05:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  09:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Happenstance

Have rollback, familiar with policy, established editor, been active in vandal-whacking since way back when #cvn-wp-en was still the place to be. —what a crazy random happenstance 05:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Kansan

I am a rollbacker and familiar with policy. Kansan (talk) 06:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  07:02, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

User:HumphreyW

Some pages on my watchlist are now tagged with "pending changes" so I would like to be able to more easily deal with vandalism edits and/or approval of sensible edits. I currently have rollback rights. HumphreyW (talk) 07:25, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 07:53, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

User:RGTraynor

I am a rollbacker and long-time editor with just short of 27,000 edits.  RGTraynor  08:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  09:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Lawrencekhoo

I'm an economist, and I regularly edit Economics, which I now cannot do without reviewer rights. LK (talk) 10:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 13:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Note, however that you were already able to edit the article and, as an autoconfirmed user, your edits will go live immediately. See WP:PEND for details. This simply gives you the ability to accept or reject pending edits. —DoRD (talk) 13:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Racepacket

Want to assist in the trial program. I am mostly active in editing articles in Virginia, Illinois, higher education and running. Racepacket (talk) 11:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 13:49, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Omnedon

I'm a rollbacker and a well-established editor and am familiar with policy. Omnedon (talk) 12:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 13:49, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

User:PCock

I am an experience user, here since 2006, and would like to contribute to the pending changes trial by acting as a reviewer. Peacock (talk) 18:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 18:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

User:ChimpanzeeUK

Regular editor. Mainly of video gaming-related articles. Chimpanzee - User | Talk | Contribs 19:28, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Orpheus

Regular editor, long track record, very keen on maintaining public face of Wikipedia Orpheus (talk) 05:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  05:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Floul1

Regular reverter of Vandalism with the Rollback Right
Thanks Floul1Talk To me 05:26, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  05:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:The 888th Avatar

I'm a fairly regular editor and very regular observer. I am a rollbacker. The 888th Avatar (talk) 07:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  10:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:WWGB

Experienced frequent editor, new page patroller and rollbacker. Strong history as a wikignome at Recent deaths. WWGB (talk) 07:58, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Was already  Done by another admin  7  10:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Johnchiu

I am a regular editor with Rollback right. I mainly work on Athletes Biographies. I am familiar with the wiki policies and I am confident that I can do a good job. Thank you. Johnchiu (talk) 08:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  10:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Otto ter Haar

I regularly edit on this wiki and support this new feature. I am a Sichter at the German wiki Otto (talk) 09:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  10:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Fæ

Regular contributor and welcoming of new users. I would like to test out the system as I have already warned a new user where their changes were pending and it would have probably been better to reject the changes as vandalism myself. Fæ (talk) 09:46, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  10:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Sandeepsp4u

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Sandeep (talk) 11:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)I am a good editor and having a long track record of editing and improving various articles and so now i am in love with it--Sandeep (talk) 11:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 17:10, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Peter.shaman

I'm here since 2007 (2005 at pl.) and know the rules. Shaman (talk) 12:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 17:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Hires an editor

Requesting since one of the articles I'm interested in has the pp-pending template on it, and I'm active in keeping that one free from vandalism. I'm also a bit of a wikignome as well. Hires an editor (talk) 12:28, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 17:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Mitch Ames

Experienced editor, 2 years, almost 5000 edits, including undoing vandalism or other inappropriate edits. The new feature will probably affect some articles I work on, so I'd like to give it a try. Mitch Ames (talk) 13:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done Jonathunder (talk) 14:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Wlmg

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Wlmg (talk) 16:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Regular editor. Mainly of science & school-related articles. Wlmg (talk) 16:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 17:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:OohBunnies!

Fairly regular, experienced user, familiar with new page and recent changes patrolling. OohBunnies!Not just any bunnies... 16:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 17:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Thundermaker

I've been an editor since 2007, moderately active since 2009. I have become familiar with BLP issues and have several BLP pages on my watchlist, some of which attract vandals. I think I would make a good reviewer for these pages. Thundermaker (talk) 18:16, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Der rikkk

I'm a regular editor, regular patroller of recent changes, and regular reverter of vandalism. My focus is on articles concerning history. I'm a very active user and I'm familiar with the policies of wikipedia. Thank you. Der rikkk (talk) 19:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 19:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:BGinOC

Having created and contributed articles on a nearly daily basis and edited various articles with similar regularity, I would like to upgrade to a Reviewer status. Thank you. BGinOC (talk) 19:52, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Svanslyck

I volunteer to help out reviewing. I'm not the best editor in the world (who is?) but I know the policies and do the best I can to improve the encyclopedia. kcylsnavS{screechharrass} 20:27, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Hohum

Regular editor and vandalism patrol, mostly on military articles (Hohum @) 20:55, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Crispmuncher

Outstanding pending reviews can only get in the way when re-working new contributions for minor issues. Already a Rollbacker. Crispmuncher (talk) 21:05, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Smaug123

Reasonably long history with >1000 edits; interested in this scheme and would like to contribute feedback Smaug123 (talk) 21:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Nave.notnilc

I'm familiar with Wikipedia guidelines and have been around a while, and interested in helping determine the feasibility of the pending changes method. Nave.notnilc (talk) 21:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done —DoRD (talk) 22:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:No1lakersfan

I am a faithful user and while I have rollback privileges I only use them when necessary to remove content inappropriate for Wikipedia. Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Contribs) 22:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  22:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Gerardw

Saw a note on my watchlist about the policy and it says "Become a reviewer!" So here I am. Gerardw (talk) 22:44, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done  7  22:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Interchange88

I wish to have greater access to editing wikipedia and sharing my knowledge with others. I also wish to have a more active role on Wikipedia in editing and discussion of articles. Interchange88 ☢ 23:22, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:28, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Rehevkor

I like to think I'm an experienced and trustworthy editor, already trusted with rollback. Rehevkor ✉ 01:21, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:27, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Rehevkor ✉ 03:05, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Allenroyboy

I've been an editor for 3.5 years. I'm in the process of converting references to harv cite reference format on an assortment of pages Allenroyboy (talk) 02:31, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Pending_changes_reviewer/Historical/Archive_5&oldid=1190233682"