User talk:Bobanni

User talk

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Bobanni! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 371 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Yosyf Zisels - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Alec Thomas

I have nominated Alec Thomas, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alec Thomas. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:51, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haitian Declaration of Independence

re your edit summary here; the mention does already exist in the second paragraph of the Independence section of the target article where it states "In February 2010, the 8 page document containing the official Declaration of Independence, which was believed to have been destroyed or thrown out, was found by a Canadian graduate student from Duke University in Britain's National Archives. Coming as it did soon after the 2010 devastating earthquake, the discovery is seen by many to be providential." So the Haitian Declaration of Independence article should just be left as a redirect to the larger content that also puts the Declaration of Independence in historical context. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oleg Khlevniuk‎

The article Oleg Khlevniuk‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Handschuh-^{talk to me} 14:56, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 00e5fd614c3dce2283e2d8935a40934a

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Speedy Deletion tag on Dickson Lake (Vancouver Island)

A tag has been placed on your newly created article, Dickson Lake (Vancouver Island). If you oppose this request, please post your reason why the article should not be deleted. For More information, see Criteria for speedy deletion: A3. Shakinglord (talk) 22:20, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy deletion tag and added a reference to this article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:43, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References for Beaufort Lake and other lake articles

Thank you for creating articles about Canadian lakes such as Beaufort Lake. When you start an article on a lake, please include the references that you use, such as The Atlas of Canada or the BC GNIS. Please take a look at what I added to Dickson Lake (Vancouver Island). Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:43, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your lake pages

Thanks for creating these pages to Wikipedia. I have one concern. Why must you leave empty headers on all your pages? At least add some content to them, I mean if there is no content, then it makes the headers useless. So, unless you were going to go back and expand on your pages, then by all means go for it. If within a few weeks the headers remain empty, they will be deleted. Your pages will still be there, though. Thank you. Regards, Tinton5 (talk) 07:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1946 Vancouver Island earthquake

The next time you undo one of my edits you should really look at them. I removed Category:Earthquakes in British Columbia because was redundant like I said in the edit summary. The category already exists in the article and there is no reason why there should be two categories in an article that are the same. Smarten up. Volcanoguy 08:18, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Fedak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Fedak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Fedak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Aprude51 (talk) 03:59, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]