Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Historical/Archive 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 10

User:Esrever

I have rollback and deal with vandalism pretty regularly. Esrever (klaT) 18:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Antony-22

Regular contributor with almost 4 years experience, long history of positive contributions mostly in nanotechnology- and science-related articles, no history of policy violations Antony-22 (talk) 19:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Arxiloxos

I have rollback, and clean up vandalism regularly. Arxiloxos (talk) 19:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Annalise

I'm a reasonably experienced editor in good standing, and I'd like to be involved in the trial. Annalise (talk) 19:28, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
( Done.--Courcelles (talk) 19:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Magnus Manske

I've been around a while, and I'm a Reviewer on German Wikipedia Magnus Manske (talk) 19:42, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
checkY Redundant - you're an admin, you have it automatically as part of the sysop package. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:48, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:R. S. Shaw

Experienced user; have rollbacker; some involvement with Flagged Revisions R. S. Shaw (talk) 19:46, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:46, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Qwfp

Veteran editor, rollbacker, occasional living people recent changes patroller, interested in the trial Qwfp (talk) 19:49, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Alanraywiki

Pretty active editor (almost 4 years, over 13,000 edits), already have rollback rights Alanraywiki (talk) 19:50, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Hadger

I have experience with rollback and reverting vandalism. I edit regularly (unless I am very busy), and I know what is and what is not a neutral point of view. Hadger 20:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Prhartcom

I have an editing history, I have read our policy on vandalism, I familiar with the basic content policies, and I have just read the guideline on reviewing. —Prhartcom 20:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Christian75

I'm a rollbacker and wish to participate in the trial. I am already removing a lot of vandalism with Huggle Christian75 (talk) 20:28, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Blaxthos

  • [[User:{{subst:Blaxthos}}|{{subst:Blaxthos}}]] · ([[User talk:{{subst:Blaxthos}}|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/{{subst:Blaxthos}}|contribs]] · [[Special:DeletedContributions/{{subst:Blaxthos}}|deleted]] · [[:luxo:{{subst:Blaxthos}}|cross-wiki]] · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{subst:Blaxthos}}|rfar]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/{{subst:Blaxthos}}|rfc]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{subst:Blaxthos}}|rfcu]] · [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/{{subst:Blaxthos}}|ssp]] · [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{subst:Blaxthos}}|spi]] · search an, ani, cn, an3) ([[Special:Userrights/{{subst:Blaxthos}}|assign permissions]])
Regular editor for 5+ years, current rollbacker. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 20:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
  •  Already done

User:Witty lama

Will be useful to demonstrate to people in the GLAM sector when I present, also to follow articles I'm involved with at the British Museum project Witty Lama 20:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Athenean

Regular user with almost 3 years experience, and rollbacker. Athenean (talk) 20:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Ghmyrtle

Lots of experience of building content, reverting vandalism and developing consensus in contentious areas. Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:42, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Falcon8765

Have rollback already Falcon8765 (talk) 20:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Mikenorton

I do my fair share of reverting vandalism and this may be useful Mikenorton (talk) 20:44, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:RolandR

Long-standing editor. I frequently remove vandalism from BLPs and other articles. RolandR (talk) 21:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Radeksz

I already have autoreview and rollback rights and have been on Wikipedia for 5 yrs, frequently reverting vandalism radek (talk) 21:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done. Courcelles (talk) 21:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:NickCT

Fairly active editor over the past several months. Have read and understand Wikipedia:Reviewing#Reviewing_process. Occasionally do recent changes patrol. NickCT (talk) 21:25, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Zarel

Been editing on and off since 2005; familiar with Wikipedia policies; interested in the trial. Zarel (talk⋅c) 21:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 21:56, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Bridgeplayer

I have rollback and am looking to broaden my contribution to the project. Bridgeplayer (talk) 21:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:KimDabelsteinPetersen

Long time editor, haven't had use for rollback (using twitter), online several hours each day. Kim D. Petersen (talk) 21:46, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Eeekster

Already have rollback and have been doing new page patrol for quite a while Eeekster (talk) 21:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Piotrus

I have autoreview and rollback rights, have been on Wikipedia for 5+ yrs and have done my share of content-creation, gnomish and vandal-fighting work. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:04, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Snori

Sensible extension of my current work reverting vandalism Snori (talk) 22:04, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done --Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Sumsum2010

I do some vandalism removal and Reviewer would make it easier. Sign My Guestbook!·Sumsum2010·Talk 22:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done I also added WP:ROLLBACK as I guess it would be handy but if you do not wish to have that flag let me or another admin know. Pedro :  Chat  22:19, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Mwalcoff

I've been working on Wikipedia for years and feel my experience demonstrates I can be trusted with this privilege. Mwalcoff (talk) 22:23, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Not a privilege IMHO - a right, but  Done of course. Pedro :  Chat  22:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Scartol

I've been fighting vandalism and cleaning up articles for almost three years now. Scartol • Tok 22:25, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Loosmark

Editor for nearly 3 years. I frequently remove vandalism from articles I have on watch. I am familiar with the policies, and I have read the guideline on reviewing.  Dr. Loosmark  22:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Hertz1888

More than three years on Wikipedia, nearly two of them as a rollbacker; more than 24,000 edits, a huge number of them reverting vandalism. If only there could be less of that to deal with. The additional rights could help in the constant struggle against disruption. Hertz1888 (talk) 22:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done--Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:38, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Barrylb

Have been editing for a number of years and have rollback rights Barrylb (talk) 22:52, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Cargoking

I have worked on the project since March 2009 and have rollback rights. I feel I can be trusted using this tool to help improve the quality of Wikipedia's articles in this trial period. —  Cargoking  talk  22:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
I gave it to you last night, you want it twice? Ungrateful! ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:58, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done for all intents and purposes. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Morten Haan

I am a reviewer in German Wikipedia which was the first one that introduced the reviwed versions. So I am familiar with the review and rollback rights. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:UserList?username=Morten+Haan&group=editor&limit=1&uselang=en I have also a clean block log. Morten Haan (talk) 23:02, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:QwerpQwertus

I used to do do a lot of vandalism removal a while ago and still do quite a bit now, so I'd like to help out with this. ~ QwerpQwertus ·_Contact Me_·_Talkback_· 23:15, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:18, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Lucy-marie

I would like to extend my capabilities to participate constructively to Wikipedia. I have constructively edited for some years and have learnt from mistakes made in the years ago which now do not occur in my editing at all. Lucy-marie (talk) 23:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done--Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:19, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:1ForTheMoney

Mostly to review edits made to RuneScape, but also to familiarise myself with the tool 1ForTheMoney (talk) 23:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:39, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:ColinFine

I do a fair bit of vandalism patrol (though not on any kind of regular schedule) ColinFine (talk) 23:42, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Heracles31

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Heracles31 (talk) 23:49, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I mostly contribute to WP by cleaning up vandalism. I would like to be part of that trial and help adding more good stuff and not just removing the bad one. Heracles31 (talk) 23:49, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Gmaxwell

Software testing mostly. Obviously I've been around long enough to handle the awesome power of reviewer status. ;) I've also read the relevant policies. Gmaxwell (talk) 23:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:59, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Dogcow

These days, I do more vandalism rollbacking rather than content generation of my own; I'm curious to see how well the reviewed edits will work. moof (talk) 23:56, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:59, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Nn123645

I've been a bit busy lately, and thus not as active as I'd like to be, but I've had rollbacker rights since the usergroup was added. I'd like to help out where I can with reviewing. nn123645 (talk) 00:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Merlissimo

Local Bot operator with fixing broken links gloabally, dewiki admin, working at living dead people at the moment ;-) Merlissimo 00:11, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:FactStraight

I've been editing for a few years now and have noticed the increased traffic in vandalism and sub-optimal editing. Not only do I bring a demonstrated commitment to fairness, but I actually explain why I did what I did, a practice both helpful to and appreciated by editors. Have tried to fix initial errors in completing this app & hope if I haven't someone will assist. FactStraight (talk) 00:25, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Stefan

Long standing editor which first page ever edited is on the trial list, no blocks, AWB, rollback --Stefan talk 00:35, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Already done by HJ Mitchell. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 00:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:N419BH

Already have Rollback, Reviewer protection looks like an excellent idea and I would love to help sort these edits as well. N419BH 00:42, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 00:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:RomaC

Five years on Wikipedia with a policy-first approach to editing, no blocks, have done and continue to do vandalism patrolling, and frequently work to try and address disruptive editing. Interested in further contributing to the improvement of the project. RomaC (talk) 00:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Robofish

I'm interested in protecting our articles from vandalism and libel, particularly BLPs. I've been contributing to Wikipedia for four years, with over 36,000 edits, and have had rollback for two years. I think I know Wikipedia's policies well enough by now to follow and enforce them correctly. Robofish (talk) 00:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done –MuZemike 01:08, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Jimbo Wales

  1. I have an account, and routinely edit
  2. I have a reasonable editing history – as a guide enough edits that a track record can be established.
  3. I have read our policy on vandalism and understand what is and what is not vandalism.
  4. I am familiar with the basic content policies: Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not.
  5. I have read the guideline on reviewing. Jimbo Wales (talk) 01:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done –MuZemike 01:06, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
But it's redundant to the admin bit, which he has (and therefore could just add himself). I'm going to remove it, but either of you can revert me if I'm wrong. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:09, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Doesn't matter to me. I know Jimbo doesn't use the block button anymore, but technically, you're right :) –MuZemike 01:14, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Well if he wants one more right appearing under his name on popups, it's fine by me, but it doesn't do anything for him he can't already do. I don't know if he knew that or not! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Supertouch

Sounds like a sound, preemptive way to deal with vandalism and other non-productive edits. Supertouch (talk) 01:38, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:51, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Quinxorin

I plan to review edits on review protected pages. I am already a Rollbacker. Quinxorin (talk) 01:38, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


User:VMS Mosaic

Have had rollback since it was first available and have made over 20,000 edits over my five years here. Would like to help with this new process. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Parent5446

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights

Been on Wikipedia quite a while, already have rollback, even had accountcreator permission for a while until I became inactive in that area. Furthermore, some of the articles I edit, such as Google are semi-protected currently and could be candidates for pending changes protection.— Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 02:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:WCityMike

Substantial amount of time on Wikipedia – just another way this old wikignome could help out. WCityMike 01:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Jeff3000

Can help with this new method of reducing vandalism, and at the same time learn how to use this test-vehicle for if and when it gets used in a more widespread manner Jeff3000 (talk) 02:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Wiki.Tango.Foxtrot

Already an autoconfirmed user, and I've been reviewing Good articles for the past couple of months now. Having reviewer rights would make things go smoother when reviewing GAs and making minor edits to the grammar when necessary. WTF? (talk) 03:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:36, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Seb az86556

User would be trusted with the tool. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐) 03:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:47, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


User:DiverDave

I believe my track record thus far is pretty good, and I would like to advance the Wikipedia project in any way I can. Thank you for your consideration! DiverDave (talk) 04:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Tracer9999

I already remove alot of vandalism and blp violations. Being granted this right will allow me to help keep wikipedia accurate and vandal free. I have made almost 2500 edits Tracer9999 (talk) 04:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Richardguk

Regularly undoing vandalism using WP:POPUPS, this seems likely to assist. Richardguk (talk) 04:46, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Maddiekate

I am a rollbacker and a trusted editor. I have checked it out over at http://flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org/. Maddie talk 06:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 06:24, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:TheFeds

I've test-driven this on the flagged revisions test wiki, and feel comfortable using it appropriately here. (Rollbacker, experienced user.) TheFeds 06:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 06:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:TicketMan

I've never got round to applying for Rollback (maybe I should...) but I do spend a lot of time patrolling recent changes etc. --TicketMan - Talk - contribs 06:39, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Note: Looks like Courcelles gave Reviewer to you already.  7  07:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Already done ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 08:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Cordless Larry

I like to think that I'm a responsible editor who abides by Wikipedia policies. I'd like to be involved in the new review trial. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:48, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done - keep an eye on Wikipedia:Reviewing as the trial progresses.  7  06:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Stanistani

Long-term gnome-like editor, no edits against policy. →StaniStani  07:16, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done NW (Talk) 07:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Attilios

I am an experienced Wikipedia editor (nearly five yers) with a great deal of articles under my watchlist, especially for Italian themes '''Attilios''' (talk) 07:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Note: Looks like Courcelles gave Reviewer to you already.  7  07:48, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Already done ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 08:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:VasilievVV

I am an experienced Wikipedia editor and an RC patroller vvvt 08:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done Stifle (talk) 08:08, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Euku

I'm a rollbacker and admin on German Wikipedia. --Euku 08:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 08:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:AutoGeek

To have edits automatically approved by the pending changes system; this account will not review changes. AutoGeek (talk) 08:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
I think you are looking for Autoreviewer below.  7  08:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Actually - autoreviewer is only for new articles. I am not sure if there is a flag that will do what you are asking (to have edits not subject to review).  7  09:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
A group "autoreviewer" having the "review" right would be the best to do right now. I'll go file something in bugzilla. —ΩpenTheWindows™ 09:22, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Fresh! (alas bug #) —ΩpenTheWindows™ 09:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
There is such a right, see Special:ListGroupRights. It is called "Autoreviewer". However, I don't think you can activelly assign it to someone, as it is granted automatically based on the edit of an user (i.e edit counts, number of blocks etc). Don't know the actual requirements to get it, though. --PaterMcFly talk contribs 09:48, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
No, autoreviewer is something totally different, and has to do with WP:NPP. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 14:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:PaterMcFly

Although not very active on enwiki, I like the tool for fighting vandalism and knowing which edits need to be checked. I have rollback rights and I am sysop on dewiki, so I do know how flaggedrevs work. PaterMcFly talk contribs 09:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Nmate

I have been on Wikipedia for 3+ years. I am familiar with the policies, and I have read the guideline on reviewing. I frequently remove vandalism from articles, which are on my watchlist.--Nmate (talk) 09:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Triwbe

I have supported flagged revisions and I am a strong vandal fighter. I beleieve in the Five pillars and Attribution. --Triwbe (talk) 10:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Schrandit

I'm coming off a recent block but I promise I'm a nice guy. More importantly I've been editing actively since 2005, I'm an Autoreviewer, my name came up on the Database report for potential reviewer candidates, I'm involved in vandal fighting, I'm firmiliar with policy, I have read the guideline on reviewing and it all made sense. Schrandit (talk) 10:39, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Gonzonoir

I have rollbacker rights, nearly 10,000 live edits, a clean block log, and an interest in testing this feature out. Gonzonoir (talk) 14:11, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Xeno. Gonzonoir (talk) 14:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Chaoticfluffy

I've been on WP for more than two years, I have a steady editing hand and experience reverting vandalism, and think I could be of use in this department. keɪɑtɪk flʌfi (talk) 14:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Leinad

Two years ago I led the introduction of a FlaggedRevs on pl.wiki, now I'm interested in how it works on en.wiki. LeinaD (t) 14:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Baxter9

I've been on WP for more than 3 years. I am an established user, and I have experience reverting vandalism, (with TW) and think I could be of use in this department. Thank you.B@xter9 14:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
THX Xeno!--B@xter9 15:15, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:CoolKoon

I've been a member of Wikipedia for quite a few years and have been reading it for even longer (4 years?5?). I know most of the bells and whistles of the wiki, even familiar with the mediawiki system to some extent. I'm surprised to hear that page review's gonna be used on the English Wikipedia as well. I already have reviewer status on the Hungarian wiki, therefore I can hardly see a reason that would prevent me from obtaining reviewer status over here as well. AFAIK I didn't have any blocks on English wiki either. Does that mean I get it? Please? CoolKoon (talk) 14:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks CoolKoon (talk) 15:06, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Mr little irish

I have just read the guidelines and I seem to fit into most, if not all the criteria. Would like to learn about different aspects of Wiki also. Won't use this tool for bad. Clean block-log. Just received Rollback rights today too, so a two in one would be an added bonus for my moral. Mr little irish(talk) 14:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Sinneed

I hope this reduces the number of articles that can't be edited directly by anon editors. I would like to be part of the test. - Sinneed 15:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, thank you yourself, I myself like appreciate it the change. *blink* (ok I couldn't resist) - Sinneed 15:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Pietrow

I'd like to test the new features first-hand, that's all to be honest. — Pietrow ☏ 15:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Vipinhari

I've been around here a while and I'm a rollbacker in en.wiki. Would like to test this feature. Thanks. Vipinhari || talk 16:41, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Incnis Mrsi

I am familiar with the basic content policies of Wikipedia and have over 10,000 edits in Wikipedia (in all languages, of which 1337 edits in English Wikipedia). I sometimes use reviewer rights in Russian Wikipedia. Also, I am familiar with rollback feature and use it in several wikis across the Foundation, including en.wiki. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:16, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Zangar

I've been on wikipedia for some time now, and although not the most prolific editor I am familiar with the relevant policies and enjoy working towards consensus building Zangar (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:TheRealFennShysa

I mostly keep an eye out for vandalism/spam on specific articles these days, and I'd like to test the new features first-hand, to be honest. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:25, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 17:50, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Yopie

Hello, I´m on Wikipedia 4 years, 5 months with 4 333 edits and I´m member of Czech ArbComm, so I´m familiar with policies. Thank you Yopie (talk) 17:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 17:48, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Hobartimus

I've been around for a few years , have above 10 000 edits and I'm also a rollbacker. I'm also interested in this feature since I've seen it work quite well in other wikis. Hobartimus (talk) 17:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Already done by Xeno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:08, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Sxeptomaniac

I've been around for a few years, and I'm pretty familiar with policy and what is and is not vandalism. I have multiple frequently-targeted articles on my watchlist. Sχeptomaniacχαιρετε 17:39, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 17:50, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Zagalejo

I've been around for about 5 years, I have a clean block record, and I've spent lots of time patrolling BLPs. Zagalejo^^^ 18:14, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Happysailor

Been around for a while, am already a rollbacker and routinely revert vanadalism when online. Would like to test this new feature Happysailor (Talk) 18:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Mike R

Long-time active Wikipedian. Mike R (talk) 19:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Enos733

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Enos733 (talk) 19:24, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Long-time active Wikipedian.

 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Jackyd101

Wikipedian of more than four years standing with a list of FAs and GAs longer than your arm. Jackyd101 (talk) 19:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Already done by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


User:All Hallow's Wraith

Something like 57,000 edits? All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Pending_changes_reviewer/Historical/Archive_3&oldid=1190234036"