User talk:Gz33

User Page · Talk page · Contributions . Edit Count

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Gz33}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Developing yet another countervandalism collaboration tool

Hi. I see that you are actively reverting vandalism. Would you be interested to give it a test run to a a Web 2.0 countervandalism collaboration tool that I develop? It's here: http://wpcvn.com/ The site is supposed to be intuitive. Can you try using it, patrol a few recent changes and give me some feedback? --Dc987 (talk) 04:42, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very cool tool... would be nice to have the option of setting the links to go to the wikimedia secure server maybe? Oh and a scrollbar... or am I just missing it? Gz33 (talk) 07:58, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I guess 'use https links' could be an option. Would you be willing to submit a patch ;) ?

Scrolling. Uh. That's tough. Currently there is only pagination+filtering+sorting. But it looks like supporting scrolling is pretty much unavoidable. I'll see what I can do. --Dc987 (talk) 23:25, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Patch? Would but university's keeping me too busy sorry :( . I don't see this as too urgent an issue though as I doubt many other users are paranoid enough to use wikipedia https.

The scrolling likely will be though as I doubt there are many screens out there which will actually be able to fit 100 edits on one page lol.

On another note... It's my birthday yay!!!

Good luck. ♠Gz33 (talk) 09:49, 31 May 2010 (UTC)♠[reply]

Welcome

Hello Gz33, and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope that you have enjoyed contributing and want to stick around. Here are some tips to help you get started:

Learn the basics by reading the introduction and taking the tutorial.
Remember to sign messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~) to automatically insert your username and the date.
Enjoy editing to improve articles, but try to leave an edit summary to explain what you are doing.
Create your first article using the Article Wizard to help avoid common mistakes, which may lead to article deletion.
Although you don't need to be familiar with all of Wikipedia's policies, try to keep to the core principles and basic guidelines.
When dealing with fellow Wikipedians, please remain polite, solve problems calmly, and remember that no-one is out to get you.
Get involved with the community by joining a WikiProject.
Make any test edits in the sandbox or click here and create a sandbox of your own.
If you are having difficulty, consider finding a mentor to give you more personal advice.
If in doubt, be bold. If you make a mistake, it can easily be reverted.

If you need any more information, plenty of help is available - check out Wikipedia:Questions; ask your question here and attract help with the code {{helpme}}; or leave me a message on my talk page explaining your problem and I will help as best as I can. Again, welcome! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 15:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!♠Gz33 (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC)♠[reply]

{{helpme}}I'm planning to recreate a previously deleted article but cant find its discussion any more. any tips? Thanks gz³³ (talk) 17:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Search for the name of the article (in quotes if two words) with the Wikipedia search, and then click 'advanced', and look on user talk pages - you might find the CSD/PROD/AfD notification, which might lead to a connection. Or search 'everything' and look around for it. You could try AfD archives too, Wikipedia:AFD#Search AfD discussions.

If you know the name, if you go to the (non-existent) article page, the log at the top should say who deleted it, and why. That may lead to something.

Google search can help, too - on terms you think were in it.

Hope that helps; if you need more specific help, tell me what it is and I'll look for it. Chzz ► 17:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm an admin so if you give me the exact page title, I can check the history for you and find out why it was deleted. :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! These Four Walls(band) Was the title I'm reasonably sure. The link to the deletion discussion is no longer there, nor does it even mention the deletion any more. I do remember that it was because of notability but I would like to see the actual discussion and possibly find whatever indication(if any) of notability the original article gave.gz³³ (talk) 17:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. It was These Four Walls (band) (with a space). It was speedily deleted under A7 ({{db-band}}). The content was:

These Four Walls is a rock band, from the North Shore in Auckland, New Zealand. Formed by Gray Vickers and Stephen Gibb in 2004, who met as a result of an online advertisement posted by Gray, who was looking to work with a singer.
The band released their debut album Down Falls An Empire on September 14, 2009. It was ranked #22 on the Top40 album charts.

--I'll allow you to decide for yourself if you think it's worth re-creating. :) I don't deal with A7, but if you need anything else, just ask. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh it had a space... that explains it. Thanks! Good I should be able improve on than that. Now I best get writing... gz³³ (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 01:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks gz³³ (talk) 01:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Habba syndrome

It appears the consensus was merge. I am not sure how it ending up being delete. It appears that the last comments were from someone unfamiliar with the medical literature. Uptodate is indeed a reliable secondary source. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, a note should probably be made on the page it is merged to though that it is not universally accepted, or that it is a proposed cause, given the sparse amount of coverage it has received. Especially since the only mention of UpToDate in WP:MEDRS suggests it be used more as a guide to assess the importance of the literature it refers to, not as a primary source. In the end it's still referring to the same letter to the editor, and only really in saying that a connection "has been described" really only means it is agreed that Dr Habba has described it, not even that he believes it, or that anyone else does for that matter. This isn't to say that they don't, just that we can't reliably say they do. Having a reliable source that says that someone has described elephants as pink doesn't mean this is true. It could be an opinion, a lie, insanity, all of the above or none of the above. Note this doesn't mean I am insinuating Dr Habba is right or wrong, merely that neither can be confirmed. gz³³ (talk) 04:37, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Morris Dees

Morris Dees and the SPLC discriminate against white people. I am a Neo Confederate and proud! The SPLC is a HATE group that does not allow people there OWN opinion and protect there own property.

See WP:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ#Morally_offensive_views. gz³³ (talk) 22:22, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NFSU2

FYI, Caleb Reece's gang in Underground 2 is called The Wraiths. Some joker or jokers keep putting "Street Reapers" in there. They obviously haven't played the game as Rachel Teller specifically mentions "The Wraiths" by name in a cutscene. (SnakeEyesNinja (talk) 03:54, 2 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

So fix it. I'm not an admin so there's not really much I can do about it that you can't, but if I see any vandalism on that or any other page I'll revert it. Oh and please don't blank pages to get peoples attention. Cheers, gz³³ (talk) 06:39, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your prompt action. Take care. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 01:09, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. Happy to help! gz³³ (talk) 01:13, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gz33. You have new messages at FFPC161260's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

FFPC161260 (talk) 12:32, 11 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Gz33. You have new messages at Gogo Dodo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CSD of Minnesota Math and Science Academy

Hi! Thanks for drawing my attention to Minnesota Math and Science Academy. I didn't delete the article, as it wasn't a newly created attack page, but a vandalised article. I have reverted to the last decent version of the article. It's always best before nominating an article for any form of deletion to check whether or not there are any previous decent versions that can be reverted to. If someone has vandalised in such a way that their revision needs deleting, it can be requested at WP:OVERSIGHT. Thanks for your help in fighting the vandals! Stephen! ^Coming... 09:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. I tried to find a good version to revert to but couldn't as it seems there have only been promotional toned versions of the article, negative revisions and stub sized ones. One things for certain, a rewrite is needed to correct the current promotional tone. Unfortunately seems to be a common case with school articles, people seem to all have an opinion on them (which is fair enough, but not appropriate for an encyclopedia). gz³³ (talk) 09:50, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that took so long, the edit filters didn't like me for some reason... gz³³ (talk) 09:52, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not to worry; the edit filters have been playing up. I tried (and failed) to post a warning on the article vandal's page, but it wouldn't let me. Turns out I'm one of many people suffering this problem. Have a look at Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports#Group of errors triggered by a mistake. Stephen! ^Coming... 11:50, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I looked up what I tripped and apparently it thought I was telling a your mum joke/insult. I'll just edit the article for NPOV then. gz³³ (talk) 12:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick question: how would you recommend handling this? I reverted it but would this be better handled as spam, or copyvio as it appears to be both since it was copied directly from the school's promotional website and repeats what's already in the article anyway. gz³³ (talk) 23:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting it was perfectly fine, and for the reasons given in the edit summary. I wouldn't have done anything differently at all. As for wondering if you had inadvertantly done a "your mum" joke, if you had I wouldn't have been upset as my Mum is quite open minded and has a good sense of humour. Stephen! ^Coming... 09:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

article on the International Organization of La Francophonie

Hello. I'm working on the article of the International Organization of La Francophonie. I have to modify it for school. I don't understand why it has been tagged for deletion. I'm adding some content to the existent one. Can you help me ? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ornebua (talk • contribs) 11:48, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry about that. It was because there was no content in the article apart from the link. I didn't realise you were trying to make a redirect. Someone fixed it anyway.gz³³ (talk) 12:18, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and you might want to look at this. Good luck! gz³³ (talk) 12:23, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Gz33. You have new messages at RadioFan's talk page.
Message added 13:44, 4 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Lego Prince of Persia; Monument to the Women of World War II; Jutland cattle; Ayrshire cattle; The Lady (magazine); Girolanda; Lego Games; Godtfred Kirk Christiansen; Lego board games; VCY America; Miami Medical; Better with You; London Senior Cup; Gravity (TV series); Lego Baby; Jørgen Vig Knudstorp; Happy Endings (TV series); LUGNET; Chairing of the Bard

Cleanup: List of White Collar episodes; Red Poll; Galloway cattle
Merge: Piedmontese (cattle); Earmark (agriculture); Dairy Promotion Program
Add Sources: Milking Shorthorn; Graham Coxon; German Black Pied Cattle
Wikify: New Pond Farm; Royal College; Education in Tajikistan
Expand: Gardaland; Pen and Sword Books; Lipogenesis

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day

Just a quick note to thank you for taking good care of Wikipedia. :) Mokapantages (talk) 00:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) gz³³ (talk) 00:59, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Awards

Xionbox^₪ 09:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help! Thanks for the Barnstar :) gz³³ (talk) 09:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You deserve this

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your work at combatting the troll vandalism on Internet slang and Ferdinand Marcos , often right as I was getting there to help. RA0808 (talk) 15:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You've been doing some great work yourself. At first when I saw the "you have new messages" thing I thought it must be a retaliation à la the last few edits to my talk haha. gz³³ (talk) 16:26, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for your fast reaction! All best! --WhiteWriter ^speaks 16:41, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, I'm always happy to help! gz³³ (talk) 17:00, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

I edited cesar milans page I did not believe it actually would work and was curious to how you actually controlled or maintained editing. Do you have job openings? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.65.97.69 (talk) 17:12, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay, just as long as you don't continue to make edits like that one. Wikipedia is non-profit and is written, edited, maintained, and almost completely operated by volunteers. It is operated by a private, privately funded, non-profit foundation called the Wikimedia Foundation. They have a list of job openings here. I don't represent them in any way, either; nor do I represent Wikipedia. I'm just another editor. gz³³ (talk) 17:32, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Gz33, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Monterey Bay (talk) 01:42, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editor review

Hi. You might find this helpful. You can also leave a note on its talk page if you think it can be improved. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'm having a look now. I've read through the admin's reading list, guide to rfa etc before. I'm not really planning on an RFA anytime soon, though. I was mainly just looking for some feedback, as with any editor review. Oh and sorry for the late reply, I've had university exams this and last week and before that I was busy with study. gz³³ (talk) 05:58, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 3 June 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding  to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ARK Music Factory

Template:ARK Music Factory has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jrcla2 (talk) 12:47, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind – I've withdrawn my nomination. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Account deletion request

can you delete this account,plz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy iReward (talk • contribs) 01:56, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia user accounts cannot be deleted. See here gz³³ (talk) 05:58, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Completely new abortion proposal and mediation

In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.

The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.

To avoid concerns that this notice might violate WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page (or either page's respective talk page) since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie (talk) 22:20, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Gz33! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Happy First Edit Day

Happy First Edit Day, Gz33, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! :)

LovelyEdit ^talk_edits 19:28, 15 May 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Happy Birthday Gz33

Hey, Gz33. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Vatsan34 (talk) 18:13, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

-Vatsan34 (talk) 18:13, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

Hello Gz33, I'm here onbehalf of WP:ORPHAN in which you are also a participant. So, we want your opinion to a WP:ORPHAN related matter. It is a proposal by Technical 13. Please have a look here. Your opinion (i.e support, oppose etc) are very much appreciated there. Thank you. By Jim Cartar through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog drive

Hello Gz33,

WikiProject Orphanage is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive to de-orphan articles which have orphan tags!
The goal is to eliminate the backlog of orphan articles. There are currently 53301 articles which have orphan tags. The drive is running from April 12, 2014 to May 12, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all editors participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. To add your name in the participants list click here.
So start de-orphaning articles! Click here to see the list of articles need de-orphaning.
Visit Suggestions for how to de-orphan an article to know more!

Thanks. _{Opt-out Instructions} by Jim Cartar on behalf of WikiProject Orphanage through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

deOrphaning script

Hello everyone! I was just working on responding to a couple bug reports for a script that I worked up as part of a request from this project, and I noticed that only a couple people (who weren't even on this mailing list) are actually using the script. A little history on the script: In March of 2014, Jim Cartar came to my user talk page and said he needed some help in acquiring a script for a backlog drive that he was working on that could keep track of and score deOrphanings for a scored backlog drive. I took that request to the project's talk page (BackLog Drive "DO" (De-Orphaning) script proposal) and there was near unanimous support for this. I thought about the proposal and decided the best way to do it was to build a new script (which is still no where near as comprehensive as Manishearth's OrphanTabs) and build into it a mechanism that will make BLD scoring easy.

What I'm wondering at this point is, since there appears to be only two people using the script, should I continue to develop this script with a goal of using it for scoring BLDs or just debug the existing script and leave it at that. Thanks for any replies or comments.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 14:01, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday

Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC).

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gz33. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gz33. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede 66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]