I really want to encourage a much stronger culture which says: it is better to have no information, than to have information like this, with no sources. Any editor who removes such things, and refuses to allow it back without an actual and appropriate source, should be the recipient of a barnstar.
We may not be in agreement, but I wish everyone could discuss as rationally and civilly as you do, in what can be a fairly heated arena as politics. Kudos!
The Anti-Flame Barnstar
Thank you for your long and seemingly tireless efforts on Second-Amendment-related topics. Take care, OK? See you around. Kenosis (talk) 20:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your time, skill, and patience on Constitutional militia movement. You did a great job of compiling and summarizing reliable sources with the neutral point of view under difficult circumstances. Wikipedia is better because of your involvement. ·:· Will Beback·:· 08:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
Your work and contributions to the Native American and Spanish Mission Articles is appreciated. Goldenrowley 22:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence
Awarded for being a key part of the general efforts to hammer the Cuban articles towards encyclopedic standards as opposed to received wisdom. And for taking a huge amount of well publicised flak for attempting to do so without giving up! Congratulations. Zleitzen 00:17, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=small}
