User talk:WorldH

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, WorldH! Thank you for your contributions. I am Vanjagenije and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Vanjagenije (talk) 20:50, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naumburg Cathedral and the High Medieval Cultural Landscape of the Rivers Saale and Unstrut has been accepted

Naumburg Cathedral and the High Medieval Cultural Landscape of the Rivers Saale and Unstrut, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

» Shadowowl | talk 10:25, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your article

I hope my comments don't come across too strongly. I'm guessing that you wrote this for some other purpose. One thing you could quickly do is to find which of the sections actually have a "main article" and use the main article template called Template:Main to link to the main article, and where possible write the section in WP:Summary style. That might help make the language more neutral. When copying material from other articles you must use an edit summary saying "copied from x article to avoid copyright violations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs) 12:41, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rearding creating new pages in the user page

hi WorldH! I saw that you have created pages using the User: / prefix. Rather than doing this (which may be confusing for some people as they mistake your draft for an actual user's page) you can create drafts in your own userpage by creating links such as: User:WorldH/name of article. Thanks, d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 15:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Goseck (monastery) I see from the history that you were tryin to move it to the mainspace, so nevermind. Thanks, d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 15:16, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Landesausbau

Hi, I'm Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. WorldH, thanks for creating Landesausbau!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks very much for this article. It's really good. I've taged it as having a very sligthly unencyclopaedic tone in places- particularly, 'Reasons' sounds like the conclusion to an essay! But otherwise, good work.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

— O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 13:39, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pforta monastery has been accepted

Pforta monastery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Großwilsdorf has been accepted

Großwilsdorf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:30, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schleberoda has been accepted

Schleberoda, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naumburg (old city and cathedral) has been accepted

Naumburg (old city and cathedral), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TheSandDoctor (talk) 16:57, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Naumburg (old city and cathedral)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Naumburg (old city and cathedral). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Naumburg Cathedral and the High Medieval Cultural Landscape of the Rivers Saale and Unstrut. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Naumburg Cathedral and the High Medieval Cultural Landscape of the Rivers Saale and Unstrut. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:13, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, WorldH! I'm Jcc. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. jcc (tea and biscuits) 11:21, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freyburg (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Freyburg instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Based on this, it would likely be best to merge to the existing town's article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Freyburg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 03:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ebersroda (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Ebersroda instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Would likely be best as merged to the existing article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ebersroda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 03:42, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saaleck (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Saaleck Castle instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It is not clear what this article is trying to be. We already have articles about Saaleck Castle and Rudelsburg and one about Saaleck (Naumburg). So I really don't think there is a need for a new article. Any relevant data may be added to the already existing pages.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saaleck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jupitus Smart 05:53, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! WorldH, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jupitus Smart 05:53, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your good work, writing such beautiful articles. Jupitus Smart 08:53, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Burg Schönburg) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Burg Schönburg, WorldH!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article. I've moved the WHS nomination bit around, which I hope helps.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 09:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ebersroda concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ebersroda, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Freyburg concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Freyburg, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Saaleck concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Saaleck, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Freyburg

Hello, WorldH. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Freyburg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JustaZBguy (talk) 00:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ebersroda

Hello, WorldH. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ebersroda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saaleck

Hello, WorldH. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saaleck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Routes4U (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:WorldH/sandbox/Routes4U and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:WorldH/sandbox/Routes4U, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:52, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:WorldH/sandbox/Routes4U

Hello, WorldH. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:WorldH/sandbox/Routes4U.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:35, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]