Jump to content

User talk:Wikiaddict8962

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello Wikiaddict8962! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Bejnar 17:26, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Orphaned fair use image (Image:School Mascot.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:School Mascot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Krio people category

[edit]

Hi there,

I am not sure that the Krio people category can be substantiated. Do you have a source saying that each of them is Krio? I wrote several of the articles you tagged with it and one specifically, Thomas Peters, does not fit. Krio were the descendants of freed slaves that settled in Sierra Leone. Thomas Peters, however, founded Freetown and died shortly thereafter.--Thomas.macmillan 21:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nova Scotian Maroons

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia editing! See welcome message above. Some of our rules may not be obvious, but we don't use other people's copyrighted work. It appears that some or all of the article Nova Scotian Maroons that you posted on 28 February 2007 is copied from "The Jamaican Maroons" on the official web-site of the Black Cultural Centre for Nova Scotia. If you have a valid license to the material: First you need to put the hangon template on the article so that it won't get deleted. See the instructions at the top of the article. Second you need to present the GNU Free Documentation License or the author's release into the public domain to the Wikipedia administrators. See, for starters Wikipedia:Copyrights#Using copyrighted work from others. Normally the easiest way to establish valid licensing is to have the author place on his or her website one of the licensing release statements. See also, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission and especially What to do when permission is confirmed. --Bejnar 17:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Bejnar I tried to rephrase the information I gathered from the website and added some words of my own-I do apologize for any indiscrepancies I may have caused over an article I believe will improve wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wikiaddict8962 (talkcontribs) 17:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
I agree that an article on the Jamaica maroons who were taken to Nova Scotia and then Sierra Leone would be a valuable addition to the Wikipedia and I appreciate the effort that you have gone to. I would stress, however, the words of the template: "Note that simply modifying copyrighted text is not sufficient to avoid copyright infringement — it is best to write the article from scratch." It is also good to get information from multiple reliable sources when writing an article. Often this means book research (not original research) in a university library with access to published periodical indexes. It is seldom a good idea to write an article just from Internet available sources. Lastly, I would not that some of the sentences in the original article such as "The Maroons proved themselves to be excellent fighters" are classic POV statements, and if they are to be used in an encyclopedic article, they require direct citation to a specific, reliable source. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources and especially Exceptional claims require exceptional sources. Good luck. --Bejnar 18:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please follow the rules. The copyright violation notice said expressly "Do not edit this page until an administrator has resolved this issue. To write a new article without infringing material, follow this link to a temporary subpage." Yet today you removed the copyvio template and edited the page. Are there extenuating circumstances? You may answer here. --Bejnar 02:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 17:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

categories

[edit]

Hi, I have taken the liberty of standardizing the category you created at "Sierra Leonean Hospitals]]" and moving the occupants to Category:Hospitals in Sierra Leone. Also, please do not create articles that do not have substantially new content (such as History of Freetown, Sierra Leone) or do not provide enough context for someone not already familiar with the subject to figure out what it is about (such as Sherbro Culture). Such articles may fall under Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and will probably be at least merged so that there is only one short article, rather than many super-short articles on the same general topic. Please read Wikipedia:Stub#Ideal stub article when considering making a new stub. Thanks, BanyanTree 16:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Category: Sherbo People

[edit]

You blanked a CFD template from this category. I have reverted this edit, since the CFD is still open. If you object, discuss it on a talk page. Removing the template is a violation of Wikipedia policy.--AgentCDE 04:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

You may not use the words from "The Jamaican Maroons" article that came from the official web-site of the Black Cultural Centre for Nova Scotia. If you want to write a new article "from scratch", write it at Temporary Nova Scotian Maroons, as per the instructions. Do not remove the copyvio template. An administrator will move your new article at Temporary Nova Scotian Maroons to Nova Scotian Maroons after review. I repeat, do not continue to edit Nova Scotian Maroons. --Bejnar 19:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I never copied anything off any website, do you take me for a fool? I copied it off the headline Nova Scotia Maroons in the article Sierra Leone Krio people. Now please stop this sillyness and allow me to do what I love researching on various topics, thank you Bejnar. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wikiaddict8962 (talkcontribs) 21:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The problem goes deeper...

[edit]

It is a copyvio, but it isn't Wikiaddict's fault. The basis of the page Sierra Leone Krio people is a large copyvio put in by User:86.146.15.73 last year. That page needs a massive overhaul because of it - and since the Nova Scotian Maroons page is based on it it will also need an overhaul. Grutness...wha? 22:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No accusation of you copying

[edit]

There was no accusation of you copying directly from "The Jamaican Maroons" article, just of your using the material from that site, and ignoring the instructions on the copyright violation template. --Bejnar 23:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 23:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for contributing. It would be appreciated if you could add an edit summary, particularly when your changes are repetitive across several articles. It would save time on the part of others who watch for vandalism and undesirable edit. Thanks.--Appraiser 13:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shekou Thomas

[edit]

Please stop removing the speedy delete template from this article. If you do not agree that it should be deleted then please follow the instructions on the notice. This article currently does not meet the criteria at WP:BIO or WP:A. PC78 18:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Wayne Rooney. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ytny (talk) 06:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

School nickname "see also" articles

[edit]

I've noticed you've posted several new articles that are basically "See (name of school article)". The proper procedure is to make this nto a redirect, which automatically takes viewers from one article to the other. Simply put this as the text of the article:

#REDIRECT [[Name of article to go to]]

It makes things simpler for everyone. Realkyhick 22:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Maple Grove Crimson and Osseo Orioles rivalry, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maple Grove Crimson and Osseo Orioles rivalry and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 17:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History of the Krio People

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the History of the Krio People article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Garion96 (talk) 10:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sherbro Tucker Family

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Sherbro Tucker Family, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Steve (Stephen) talk 05:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't

[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Sherbro Tucker Family. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --Steve (Stephen) talk 05:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Message posted on Tuesday, June 5, 2007

[edit]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Brooklyn Junior High School. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.greatschools.net/modperl/browse_school/mn/1586 in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Brooklyn Junior High School with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Brooklyn Junior High School with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Brooklyn Junior High School saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

172.150.205.106 03:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Sherbro Tuckers

[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sherbro Tuckers, by FreeKresge (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sherbro Tuckers seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sherbro Tuckers, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Sherbro Tuckers itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:09, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thomas de S. Tucker has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. King of Hearts 05:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, did you intented to move Sierra Leone Krio people to Sierra Leone Creole people? If so, please tell me and I will fix it. To comply with the GFDL you don't copy & paste when you want to move an article but use the move button. Garion96 (talk) 18:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note, the speedy delete tag wasn't to remove the article, but to fix (again) your copy-paste move. The article will still be where you left it, with the Krio version still a redirect. To move, you should use the move tab. You can read more here. Best, Smmurphy(Talk) 20:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Multiracial. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. If you think there is a good reason to remove material from a Wikipedia article, please explain it in the edit summary. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 04:03, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kissy Road Church of the Holy Trinity, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 18:00, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Kissy Road Church of the Holy Trinity

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Kissy Road Church of the Holy Trinity meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kissy Road Church of the Holy Trinity. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. -- Jreferee (Talk) 19:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've added many references to this article, are you going to use them? If you are, you should add them to your own user space. If you've already used them, or if you wish to add them after you use them, you should do so as a full citation, as explained at WP:CITE. If you'd like help with footnotes or full citations, please let me know, I'd be happy to help. Thanks, Smmurphy(Talk) 02:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, great. Ramadan starts tomorrow, so I might be busy for a couple days as my schedule adjusts. But what you will have to do the first set of work. When you have a fact you want to reference, it is nice to use what are called the ref tags. So I just made a change that si what we need to do to sort this. You can see the change here, what I did was I took something from your list of sources and put it between <ref> and </ref> which tells the system to make that a footnote. Basically, you can put facts you'd like to cite between reference tags like that, I'll clean up the references so they are in a more readable style, as I did the Scotsman reference (you can do that, too, if you like). Thanks a lot, this will allow us to better associate the references with the article, and will help readers and future editors. Let me know if you have any more questions. Best, Smmurphy(Talk) 23:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think you can do what I asked, or should I go through your list of sources myself? If I do it, I'll probably delete them if I think the information is given by another source better. Best, Smmurphy(Talk) 15:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:African American Establishments

[edit]

Category:African American Establishments, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to participate in the deletion discussion located here. – Black Falcon (Talk) 17:53, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proof that Thomas Peters (black leader) was an Igbo?

[edit]

What is your proof that Thomas Peters of Sierra Leone fame was born in Nigeria and was an Igbo? I started the article and never found that information, so what do you have that says so? One source says "He was born a slave in the North American colonies and worked in his master's flour mill in North Carolina." while another says that "legend has it" that he was born in West Africa, but the first evidence comes from him in North Carolina. I am going to remove your incorrect information--Thomas.macmillan 14:04, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not disagreeing that he was African-American, but you created 2 overlapping, redundant categories (Black Loyalist and African-American Loyalists) which have nearly the same information. Therefore, one of them should be deleted and I removed the one most likely to be so. Also, the two online sources, including one by the govt of SL says he was born in North Carolina, so I think we should go with that one.--Thomas.macmillan 16:14, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, if you need to move a page to one that already exists you need to submit a move request. Secondly, It's the generally accepted practice to use the term in common use in historical documents and failing that the term that was in use at the time. Black Loyalists are referred to in scholarly work as Black Loyalists, not as African American Loyalists. And even if they weren't, they certainly weren't called African American loyalists then because 1. No one was an American then. 2. Even if there were Americans then, Black's certainly weren't. 3. The term African American didn't come into wide use until the late 1970s. 4. To someone unfamiliar with the nuances of the English language X-American loyalist might imply that these were people loyal to the American side when they were in fact loyal to the British. Please don't make these types of changes again without seeking a consensus on the article's talk page. Thanks. CJ 02:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, You say I'm wrong. Please provide sufficient sources that list Black Loyalists as African American Loyalists and I'll remove my objection to the page being moved. But it still needs to go through a formal move request so that the article history is preserved. CJ 02:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just because I've reverted your edits doesn't mean a consensus can't be reached in your favor. And I can certainly appreciate your sentiments. If you can find sources to document your claims then as I said, I'm more than willing to withdraw my objection to the edits going forward. The article isn't going anywhere. Also, don't feel as though you can't contribute to this or any other article. I'm sure that as a descendant of these people you can surely offer other insights besides terminology. CJ 02:47, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 02:29, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is an anachronism and a neologism to refer to "African American Loyalists". I don't know whether British colonists were referred to as Americans, but certainly enslaved Africans would not have been referred to as "African Americans".

Are there any reliable sources that use the phrase? A quick look at the footnotes and external links suggests otherwise: Black Loyalist Directory, blackloyalist.com, Black Loyalist Heritage Society.

Please see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names): "Use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things."

"Black loyalists" gets 37,600 Google hits. "African American loyalists" gets 86. I think the burden of proof is on you to demonstrate why "African American loyalists" is superior to "Black loyalists". — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 02:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They were "Black loyalists". Calling them "African American loyalists" is an attempt to use a 20th century phrase to describe people of the 18th century. They were enslaved Africans in Colonial America, but they were not "African Americans". In order to be an "African American" one must be an American, which is an identity that British colonists in North America may not have assumed at that point, and most certainly is an identity that their enslaved Africans didn't have.
In any event, it doesn't matter what you or I want to call them. Wikipedia's naming conventions say that article titles should use "the most common name of a person or thing". I've indicated above that "Black loyalists" seems to be a much more common name than "African American loyalists". Can you demonstrate that "African American loyalists" is more commonly used than "Black loyalists"? — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 06:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop introducing modern terms into historical contexts as you did at Black Loyalists. Doing so is a violation of WP:NEO and WP:NCI. If you continue these disruptions you will be reported to an administrator. CJ 10:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:African American Loyalists

[edit]

Category:African American Loyalists, which you recently created, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, please follow the link in the CFD notice on the Category page. Thank you. Cgingold 13:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Black Loyalists

[edit]

That still doesn't justify you identifying them as African Americans. Again. My earlier warning still stands.CJ 22:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel we're wrong then feel free to go to WP:DR and get someone else to make an opinion. But don't keep putting bad information back into an article just because you feel it's right. That's what gets you reported. CJ 22:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think an article from 1999 that uses the phrase African American a grand total of three times, twice as a neologism, justifies using it that way in a wikipedia article. It doesn't prove that African American was a term in use at that time. It only demonstrates that the author made the same error you want to. But as I said before, you're welcome to take it to dispute resolution.CJ 10:53, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've made my point. I'm not going to continue repeating it. If you want to continue this conversation then you need to go to WP:DE. CJ 00:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Americo-Liberian history, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Americo-Liberian history is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Americo-Liberian history, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 22:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 00:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

david george

[edit]

please fix the dangling sentences, and cite the 7% statistic, so the page can be marked as patrolled, thanks. ThuranX (talk) 16:24, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Black Loyalist, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Your ongoing effort to add the anachronism African American to Black Loyalist is becoming disruptive. Please stop. Thank you.Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 06:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. It is doubtful that any Black Loyalists were "born in the United States", as you wrote, since they were born before the American Revolution. Please stop reverting changes that have been made by consensus, and don't re-create categories that have been closed after discussion. If you would like to change consensus, please post your messages at Talk:Black Loyalist. It would be helpful if you could provide contemporary sources that suggest Black loyalists were referred to as African Americans. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 04:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, and especially for providing sources for the use of the phrase "African American" with respect to Black Loyalists. You're right: the British source refers to Black loyalists as African Americans and the Nova Scotian source refers to "enslaved African Americans".
You are also right about Simon Schama. On pages 5-6 of Rough Crossings: Britain, The Slaves and The American Revolution (2006), he writes that "Tens of thousands of African-Americans clung to the sentimental notion of a British freedom even when they knew that the English were far from being saints in respect to slavery." He uses the phrase to describe several people in his book and uses the phrase at least a dozen times. (Although I note that Rough Crossings refers to "enslaved Africans". )
I've never heard of Cassandra Pybus, but Epic Journeys of Freedom: Runaway Slaves of the American Revolution and Their Global Quest for Liberty was published by a reputable publisher and has an foreword by Ira Berlin. She writes on page 84 of "African American and African Caribbean men, often runaway slaves, joining ships heading for England", and on page 104 she refers to the British "facilitating the flight of enslaved African Americans".
Frankly, I think it's anachronistic to use a modern term (African American) to describe people who were considered sub-human by (white) "Americans". In its Dred Scott decision, the Supreme Court rightly summarized what the founders of the United States thought of people of African descent:
It is difficult at this day to realize the state of public opinion in relation to that unfortunate race, which prevailed in the civilized and enlightened portions of the world at the time of the Declaration of Independence, and when the Constitution of the United States was framed and adopted. ... They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit.
I cannot imagine that any people of African of descent, free or enslaved, were considered "Americans". But I won't continue to argue the point with you. If you don't mind, I would like to copy our messages to Talk:Black Loyalist to explain the use of the phrase "African American" in the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 05:38, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry that we've misunderstood one another. It's never been my intention to question whether Black Loyalists were in any way different from Blacks who ended up in the United States. Of course they were the same; I can easily imagine that circumstances led to the break-up of some families between the United States and Canada.
My objection to the use of the term "African American" was related to an on-going debate, in the real world and among Wikipedia editors, about whether the word "African American" is appropriate to describe any enslaved person, or any person of African descent, before Reconstruction. Many editors, including me, use "enslaved Africans" because we don't believe "African American" is appropriate.
Again, I'm sorry that I misunderstood your point, and that this disagreement led me to accuse you of being disruptive. I hope that we can work together harmoniously in the future. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 03:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:54, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cotton Tree (Freetown)

[edit]

I reverted your change of the redirect to Cotton Tree. There is already an article about the Cotton Tree as you can see. The redirect doesn't cause you to loose your edit.--Sandahl 01:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of McGill Family (Monrovia)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on McGill Family (Monrovia) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -MBK004 18:44, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, a question. Could you cite the sources you listed in this article. The total amount of sources is almost as big as the article itself and is getting out of hand. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for an explanation how to cite sources in on article. Garion96 (talk) 10:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know much of the topic, so I can't help much in deciding what to use. I can help you with the citing part though. If you just add the source url with http:\\www.google.com] behind the sentence you want to cite (if that information is in the source url), I can finish it and it the complete reference for you. Garion96 (talk) 19:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Macfoy family (Sierra Leone) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

woah!

[edit]

Please don't make multiple articles with the same content but with different names. See Wikipedia:Redirect. Thanks, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...Notifying you that i listed your article for deletion...

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Macfoy family (Sierra Leone), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macfoy family (Sierra Leone). Thank you.

Lauryn Hill

[edit]

Where did you find a source, citing that she is Jamaican or Jamaican-American? I can't seem to find one anywhere, so I'm assuming that it's not true. If you're not sure what I'm talking about, take a look at this. Blackjays1 (talk) 12:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

david George

[edit]

Please read Wikipedia:Citing_sources and make use of the citation templates available. Your citations now consist of awful inlined external links, not citations, and a messy list of URLs. This provides you an excellent opportunity to learn the ins and outs of the Wikipedia styles and methods of citation. Especially, please note that for the article to get the best ratings in review, it needs solid inline citations. The templates are an easy way to do this. ThuranX (talk) 13:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

read the page i linked to above, and from there, go to the Citation Templates page. Both will really help. ThuranX (talk) 17:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If I have time (and energy) I'll look at it this weekend. You can also use the tool found at [1] and do it yourself. With that tool it is really easy. Garion96 (talk) 19:07, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Clan Bruce (Ghana), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Robert Bruce (Merchant Adventurer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article William Wallace Bruce, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is the "African American diaspora"? Is it a phrase you made up one day? — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 03:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of John Kizell

[edit]

A tag has been placed on John Kizell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. скоморохъ 19:42, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation style

[edit]

I notice above that someone has directed you to educate yourself on Wikipedia's citation templates. Are you having trouble? African American settlers (Sierra Leone) is thoroughly cited but not in a clear enough manner for our readers. — Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 07:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the citations for African American settlers (Sierra Leone) to show you one way of citing. I don't know how you're having trouble citing your sources, but you really should educate yourself on proper citation style instead of making edits like this and relying on other editors to clean up your mess for you. — Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 03:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How did you try? What is "it" that didn't work? — Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 06:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the way I've changed the citations. I've put inline citations that refer the author, year, and page number and at the bottom I've put the full citation (I've also used a template so that the inline citation is a link to the full citation). You seem to be overly preoccupied with linking to the source at google books but if properly cited, someone can easily find your source without you linking to it. — Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 07:41, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Beninese-American actors, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 04:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:African American Lives (television series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. emerson7 18:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

You have recently removed the phrase and thus the link to Black Loyalist from many articles, e.g. Black Canadian, Black Nova Scotians, African American settlers (Sierra Leone), Book of Negroes. You have removed articles from the category Category:Black Loyalist documents, Category:People of Black Loyalist descent, and Category:Black Loyalists. To me, it looks like a campaign to remove references to the phrase "Black Loyalist", and yet this is overwhelmingly the most commonly used term, both contemporaneously and in academic and official publications now. Please could you explain your apparent campaign. BrainyBabe (talk) 00:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned about this in the past. Although I suspect that you are making these edits in good faith, you will have to seek the consensus of the community to keep making them. --Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 16:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you want to make these changes, please discuss them first at the relevant WikiProjects, such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups, Wikipedia:WikiProject African diaspora, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada. If you continue to make these changes without a consensus of editors, you will be treated as someone making disruptive edits and could be blocked. --Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 18:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not arguing a position on the subject either way. I am reverting you edits because the consensus of the comunity as I understand it says that "black loyalist" is the term used in allmost all academic texts. If you think that consensus is wrong, please discuss it at the wikiprojects cited above before making anymore edits. --Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 18:42, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't really our place to guess what terms will be in common use in ten years. Nevertheless, if you think you have a valid case, I encourage you to start a discussion about it, just don't make sweeping changes across articles until you do.
By the way, when writing on talk pages, be sure to sign you comments with four wavy lines, like this: ~~~~ so that people know who left each comment. --Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 18:55, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for stopping your edites. Once again, I encourage you to talk to the WikiProjects about your opintion; maybe in the end you will convince them to change Wikipedia policy on the topic. Bring up you conserns about the term "Black Loyalists: at one of

and for the stuff specific to Sierra Leone, go to

--Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 19:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN notice

[edit]

FYI, but there's a discussion of your edits at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Topic_ban_on_User:Wikiaddict8962. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:03, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Vandalism April 2008

[edit]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sierra Leone Creole people, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. T L Miles (talk) 00:01, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hi. Thanks for the reply. I'm sorry I mistook your edits for vandalism, but I do have a couple of issues. If you're going to remove huge chunks of an article (it went from 55,591 bytes to 5000 bytes), you really should discuss it on the talk page first, give it a bit, and then do your business. Of course if something is uncited, libelous, etc, you should remove it quickly. But why remove half someone's biography? As a collaboration you don't have to be responsible for everything, and if an editor wants to remove your citations, s/he should get consensus on talk and do it his/her self. You seem to be removing big bits of lotsa articles, without discussion or an edit summary, or frankly without any pattern I can see. Perhaps you should take a deep breath and not worry about what someone told you you had to do.
Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources. You can read it and make up your own mind, but I see nothing about citing too many sources, if you actually use them. There's no mandate to use inline citations, though they are recommended for figures and specific facts. If someone told you different, I would suggest they're being a bit of a jerk.
And because wikipedia is a collaboration, we all need to discuss stuff, explain stuff, and sign our talk additions with four tildes. Take a look at Help:Edit summary and Help:Editing. And finally, with a grain of salt, Ignore all rules. Hope this helps, and good luck! T L Miles (talk) 04:35, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seniora Doll

[edit]

Why did you remove all that content from Seniora Doll? If you want it deleted, just tag it with {{db-author}}. --Closedmouth (talk) 05:24, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for Thomas Corker. --Closedmouth (talk) 05:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mm, sorry, forgot to reply. Anyway, that makes sense, and it's good that you're removing unreferenced content, it just seemed odd that you were completely gutting an article you yourself had created. --Closedmouth (talk) 14:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have removed several edits you made connecting these two people, through Henry's son Robert of Caen. While it is not incorrect information, you added it shotgun fashion without tailoring it to each article (you still had Henry as the subject, for example, in the article on Gloucester). Also, as i mentioned in the summary, the information linking two people who shared a hair over one percent of their blood (1.071875%, to be precise). So, please don't take it personally, but best not to use the old shotgun when adding information. Cheers, Lindsay 08:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
I must confess I edited it in a hurry. But there is no issue in stating that Robert the Bruce was a descendant of Henry Beauclerc. Preceeding pasted from my talk page. Lindsay
No, you're quite right, there is no issue in the fact: RB was, certainly, a descendent of HC. But he was also a descendent of Richard fitzGilbert, of John Marshal, and of Hugh the Great; it's not worth noting, though, since the relationship is so tenuous, though definable, so distant. After all, go back far enough, and we're all related, eh? Cheers, Lindsay 06:10, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, hope you don't mind my pasting your note here; i prefer to keep a conversation together, so i'll watch your talk page for a response. Cheers, Lindsay 06:14, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Curtis Davies

[edit]

The source in the Curtis Davies article (from the Guardian) says nothing about his father being of Creole ethnicity, merely that he is Sierra Leoneon. I did a web search to try to confirm your edit, but couldn't find anything, so I reverted it. Where did you get the information on, as I'd like to restore the info you added if there is a source out there to back it up. Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 17:54, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but you need to cite a reliable source to support the information. What is your source? --Jameboy (talk) 19:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:David George (Baptist)

[edit]

Category:David George (Baptist), which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 12:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Descendants of slave traders

[edit]

Category:Descendants of slave traders, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:11, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Descendants of Black Refugees (War of 1812)

[edit]

Category:Descendants of Black Refugees (War of 1812), which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that this category you created is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#C1. I'm notifying you in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding [[Category:Krio culture]] to articles/categories that belong in it.

I blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to revert the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty.

If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with {{db-author}}.

Contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent contributions

[edit]

Hello, I don't think we have met before, but I am slightly puzzled by your recent contributions. You are blanking pages[2] and removing content[3] without edit summaries, and I cannot understand the reason why. I would ask you to please refrain from blanking pages, as it confuses readers (for the proper ways of deletion, see the deletion policy) and removing content without explanation (as it confuses editors). If you would be kind enough to tell me what you are trying to accomplish with your removal of categories, blanking of pages and removal of misc content, I may be able to help you further in accomplishing your task. Thank you and happy editing! Foxy Loxy Pounce! 11:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Nova Scotian settlers (Sierra Leone)

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

I saw your reaction on my talk page. Please let me explain. The edits I reverted (which were almost the same as reverted previously by another user) did two things:

  1. They removed some of the references, the references section, the bibliography and the external links;
  2. They added a few small paragraphs of relevant information.

Just add the information, and nobody will have a problem with it. Of course, you should preferably add sources, or the information you add may be challenged. Debresser (talk) 18:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have written me about this subject on my talk page, and I have answered you there. Please see here. Debresser (talk) 01:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I wrote you on my talk page: if you remove sourced information again (and it is sourced information, whether you are willing to admit it or not), you risk being blocked from editing on Wikipedia. Debresser (talk) 00:25, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have ignored reverts by at least three editors, and since you have been properly warned, and nevertheless you continue with your removal of sourced information, I've reported you at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#Wikiaddict8962_reported_by_Debresser_.28Result:_.29. Debresser (talk) 00:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why you keep deleting sourced references to Black Loyalists in this article. Black Loyalist is the term commonly used by the international historiography about this migration and should appear in this article.Letterofmarque (talk) 17:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

[edit]

Please do not continue an edit war on article Nova Scotian settlers (Sierra Leone). As you've been warned before, this is your final warning and continuance will end up with you being blocked from editing to prevent disruption to Wikipedia. Disputes should be handled via the talk pages to hash out the issues and to establish a consensus. You are advised to consider Wikipedia's dispute resolution guidance. Cheers, Nja247 09:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you created this category and later blanked the page. A faster way to delete a category you've created yourself is to place {{db-author}} on the page. This tag attracts the attention of an administrator who can perform the deletion for you. Contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 20:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Africanus Horton

[edit]

Hello, I reverted your deletion of the Category:Sierra Leoneans of Igbo descent category from the Africanus Horton article because it clearly states in the article that he is of Igbo descent. Ukabia (talk) 02:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Davis family

[edit]

I'll have to go back through my research to tell you. I admit, I didn't do a good job at documenting that, thus it should be deleted. I can tell you that I did read some of this info in literature found on books.google.com. Search Fernando Po, Davis, Barber, Barleycorn... I think a Davis married into the Barelycorn family. Bab-a-lot (talk) 18:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Novascotians.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Novascotians.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:58, 10 June 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:58, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Freetownbowles.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Freetownbowles.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Alfred Whiggs Easmon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. mboverload@ 06:08, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Raymond Sarif Easmon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not sourcing to prove notability. Please add sourcing and remove this tag.

Otherwise the article may be nominated for deletion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mboverload@ 06:17, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

[edit]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. mboverload@ 06:23, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Charles Odamtten Easmon has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ϢereSpielChequers 11:12, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article William Smith (registrar), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ironholds (talk) 19:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well for a start, you created it :P. All articles need every shred of information referenced, or they simply aren't doing what they are here to do. Ironholds (talk) 16:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Carl E. Reindorf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Crusio (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Florence Mahoney has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Nat Gertler (talk) 06:16, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content at Thomas Leighton Decker

[edit]

Is there a reason why you turned this page into a redirect? Decker is certainly notable and their are certainly sources to make the content verifiable, Sadads (talk) 19:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mammah family (Sierra Leone) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Mammah family (Sierra Leone), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mammah family (Sierra Leone) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:28, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Osseo Junior High School for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Osseo Junior High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osseo Junior High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Marcusmax(speak) 21:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:ThomasDecker.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ThomasDecker.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Jfeasmon.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jfeasmon.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:African American documentaries

[edit]

Category:African American documentaries, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:57, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sherbro Rogerses for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sherbro Rogerses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherbro Rogerses until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Bejnar (talk) 02:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sherbro Caulkers for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sherbro Caulkers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherbro Caulkers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Bejnar (talk) 03:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sierra Leone Creole people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for creating this article. I'm working my way through CAT:NN's backlog, and this article has been tagged for notability for 5 years. I was wondering if you could look the article over and help improve it? Thanks in advance for any help you can give. Boleyn (talk) 21:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Odamtten Easmon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People of Black Nova Scotian descent

[edit]

Category:People of Black Nova Scotian descent, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 04:00, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Robert Benjamin Ageh Wellesley Cole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Wolof, Yoruba and Igbo
Cline Town, Sierra Leone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hausa
Granville Town, Province of Freedom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Temne
McCormack Easmon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Imperial University
Settler Town, Sierra Leone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Halifax
Sierra Leone Liberated African (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Beninese
Sir William MacCormac, 1st Baronet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Gold Coast

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:40, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albert Whiggs Easmon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gold Coast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cline Town

[edit]

Hello, Wikiaddict8962. I have made Cline Town, Sierra Leone redirect to Cline Town, essentially reversing changes that you made in May 2013. The article belongs at the shorter name since there is currently no other Cline Town described on Wikipedia. In reordering the article and the redirect, I restored a good bit of content to Cline Town. If you believe this information (which is not clearly cited to reliable sources) is inappropriate, could you please comment at Talk:Cline Town, and edit the page as needed? Thank you and happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 11:00, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sherbro Tuckers for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sherbro Tuckers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherbro Tuckers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Bejnar (talk) 17:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reginald Foresythe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Linda Dobbs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Creole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Farrell Easmon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Distinction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:CSF Easmon.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CSF Easmon.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:20, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Charles Syrett Farrell Easmon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. j⚛e deckertalk 04:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

QML

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give QML a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Qt Meta Language. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Tassedethe (talk) 14:18, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Tassedethe, I will take note of this for the future. --Wikiaddict6989 (talk) 03:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fergusson family (Sierra Leone)

[edit]

The article Fergusson family (Sierra Leone) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since creation and lacking any indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – S. Rich (talk) 05:18, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:William MacCormac.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:William MacCormac.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Henry MacCormac.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Henry MacCormac.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:RichardMacCormac.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:RichardMacCormac.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Henry MacCormac1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Henry MacCormac1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MacCormac family of County Armagh, Northern Ireland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jersey92 (talk) 03:24, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:HenryMacCormac2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:HenryMacCormac2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:RobertWellesleyCole.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:RobertWellesleyCole.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:CharlesSFEasmon.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CharlesSFEasmon.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:John Farrell Easmon photograph.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:John Farrell Easmon photograph.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:CharlesJohnBond.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CharlesJohnBond.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:07, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:CharlesOEasmongroupphoto.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CharlesOEasmongroupphoto.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:C.O. Easmon3.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:C.O. Easmon3.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:CharlesOEasmon4.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CharlesOEasmon4.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:CharlesOEasmon.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CharlesOEasmon.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:08, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Charles John Bond
added links pointing to English and CMG
MacCormac family of County Armagh, Northern Ireland
added links pointing to Scottish and Gold Coast
Sir William MacCormac, 1st Baronet
added links pointing to Bath and Joseph Lister
Charles Odamtten Easmon
added a link pointing to Danish
Robert Benjamin Ageh Wellesley Cole
added a link pointing to University of Newcastle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:DavidsonNicol.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:DavidsonNicol.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:WilliamConton Sierra Leone.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:WilliamConton Sierra Leone.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:ArthurPorter Sierra Leone.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ArthurPorter Sierra Leone.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:CCReindorf.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CCReindorf.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:CCReindorf1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CCReindorf1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:FVNankaBruce2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:FVNankaBruce2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:FVNankaBruce1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:FVNankaBruce1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:HenryMacCormac4.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:HenryMacCormac4.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:SirPatrickDean1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:SirPatrickDean1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:H.C. Bankole Bright photograph.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:H.C. Bankole Bright photograph.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:IsaacWallaceJohnson.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:IsaacWallaceJohnson.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:JBMHolstRoness.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:JBMHolstRoness.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:08, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:HJLightfootBostonphotograph.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:HJLightfootBostonphotograph.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:08, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:CharlesJohnBond5.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CharlesJohnBond5.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:CharlesJohnBond1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CharlesJohnBond1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:53, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:WilliamConton Sierra Leone.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WilliamConton Sierra Leone.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:44, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:DavidsonNicol.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DavidsonNicol.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:ArthurPorter Sierra Leone.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ArthurPorter Sierra Leone.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:SirPatrickDean1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SirPatrickDean1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:47, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:JBMHolstRoness.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JBMHolstRoness.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:48, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:HJLightfootBostonphotograph.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HJLightfootBostonphotograph.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:50, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:HenryMacCormac4.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HenryMacCormac4.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:51, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:H.C. Bankole Bright photograph.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:H.C. Bankole Bright photograph.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:52, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:FVNankaBruce2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:FVNankaBruce2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:52, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:FVNankaBruce1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:FVNankaBruce1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:53, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:CCReindorf1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CCReindorf1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:54, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:CCReindorf.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CCReindorf.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:54, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:IsaacWallaceJohnson.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:IsaacWallaceJohnson.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sierra Leone Creole people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Igbo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to upmerge category

[edit]

Please see my proposal to upmerge Category:Scottish traders to Category:Scottish merchants. Hugo999 (talk) 10:06, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 29 January

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Broughton Davies for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Broughton Davies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Broughton Davies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uhooep (talk) 21:47, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emile Short, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fante. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Foreign-born Afro-Americans

[edit]

The article Foreign-born Afro-Americans has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page is a mess. Afro-American is synonymous with African American, not a generic term for people of African ancestry in the Western hemisphere. This article has been unsourced/poorly sourced for many years. Finally, the idea that "foreign-born Afro-Americans" have anything in common beside the accident of geography of birth is pure original research without reliable sources that establish the existence of such a group.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:34, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Foreign-born Afro-Americans for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foreign-born Afro-Americans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foreign-born Afro-Americans until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:White Shoe law firms has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:White Shoe law firms, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sekicho (talk) 02:23, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oku people (Sierra Leone), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yoruba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Photograph of Sierra Leone Civil Services.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Photograph of Sierra Leone Civil Services.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Leigh (ambassador), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mende. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In general, articles on Wikipedia are not moved to another title by copying and pasting its contents; this creates a break in the article history which needs to be preserved for reference for other editors, and also in order to comply with the CC-BY-SA license. Instead, you can use the "move" link at the top of the article under the "More" button; if you are unable to move the page, either because you don't have enough edits, or because the destination is occupied, list it at requested moves. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:46, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Leslie William Leigh (police commissioner)
added a link pointing to Susu
William Henry Leigh (merchant)
added a link pointing to Dutch

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced, very short. Please continue writing.Xx236 (talk) 13:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Maroon Town, Sierra Leone has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Maroon Town, Sierra Leone, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:23, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Settler Town, Sierra Leone has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Settler Town, Sierra Leone, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 23:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nova Scotian settler churches has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Nova Scotian settler churches, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 23:34, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Wikiaddict8962. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sierra Leonean families of Nova Scotian descent, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpbT 16:14, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sierra Leonean families of African-American descent, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpbT 16:14, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nova Scotian Settler families has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Nova Scotian Settler families, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpbT 16:15, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Smith (registrar) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Smith (registrar) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Smith (registrar) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 16:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Wikiaddict8962. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roberts family (Liberia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Americo-Liberians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antebellum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Americo-Liberians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cape Mount (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Wikiaddict8962. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hamilton Edmund MacCormac for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamilton Edmund MacCormac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamilton Edmund MacCormac until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 10:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Krio religion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 21:50, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

[edit]

Please see H:R for how to create redirects. You are missing important information in the source code that is making your redirects not work. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 00:38, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Easmon family

[edit]

@ Wikiaddict8962 🍁 (talk) Great job on the Easmon family article! I think it would be a great idea to merge the "Contributions" and "Notable members" sections as they talk about the same thing to reduce repetitions and redundancy. Also, as these are encyclopaedic articles, there's really no need to use their professional titles in the body of the article although individual articles may list those official titles in the infobox. Thanks. Kandymotownie ν) 13:42, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Odamtten Easmon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grandmaster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Odamtten Easmon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Danish and German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Priddy family (Sierra Leone) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Priddy family (Sierra Leone) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priddy family (Sierra Leone) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 22:33, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Oku people (Sierra Leone) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Aja, Yoruba, Igbo, Nupe and Bundu
Fourah Bay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Yoruba
Mohamed Sanusi Tejan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Yoruba

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oku people (Sierra Leone), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bundu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Creole peoples, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leone Preparatory School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preparatory school.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lati Hyde-Forster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Principal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Noah Arthur William Cox-George, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbadian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:TraditionalCreolehouse.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/2015/0908/Once-influential-slave-descendants-in-Sierra-Leone-face-a-less-certain-future. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:TypicalAmerico-Liberianhouse.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://liberia77.com/explore/americo-liberian-house-4/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Creolefamily.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of http://www.vitabubooks.com/2016/04/constances-world-fantasy-history.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:ClarenceLSimpson.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.facebook.com/hpsol.liberia/photos/a.192614920761696/1011706212185892/?type=3&theater. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Whpq

[edit]
Hello, Wikiaddict8962. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
Message added 16:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Whpq (talk) 16:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:LeonePreparatorySchool.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.switsalone.com/23227_leone-preparatory-school-sues-ministry-of-education-at-the-high-court/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 16:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:BerthaConton.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of http://mysierraleoneonline.org/sl_portal/site/News/detail/2887. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 16:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:William Conton.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:William Conton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Whpq

[edit]
Hello, Wikiaddict8962. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
Message added 17:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Whpq (talk) 17:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Whpq

[edit]
Hello, Wikiaddict8962. You have new messages at File talk:William Conton.jpg.
Message added 17:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Whpq (talk) 17:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:ConstanceCummings-John.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:ConstanceCummings-John.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angie Brooks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grebo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Descent categories on articles about living people

[edit]

Hello. Please remember that we're not supposed to add categories about ethnicity, descent, religion, sexuality etc to artcles about living people without adding sourced verification in the article text to justify the category. See WP:BLPCAT. thanks, Struway2 (talk) 16:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:LeonePrepSchoolSL.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:LeonePrepSchoolSL.jpg, which you've attributed to https://www.switsalone.com/23227_leone-preparatory-school-sues-ministry-of-education-at-the-high-court/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

[edit]

You should correct your signature. It is rather misleading to sign as Wikiaddict6989 when your userid is Wikiaddict8962. -- Whpq (talk) 23:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:FlorenceDillsworth.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tagishsimon (talk) 10:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Women in Sierra Leone
added links pointing to Igbo and Fante
Americo-Liberian people
added a link pointing to Georgian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Noah Arthur William Cox-George, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LSE.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:ArnoldBishopGooding.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ArnoldBishopGooding.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1943 Nigerian general election
added a link pointing to Efik
James Vivian Clinton
added a link pointing to Gold Coast
Sierra Leone Creole people
added a link pointing to African

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:English people of the British Empire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:44, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Sir Ian Wilmut.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sir Ian Wilmut.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Darwin College, Cambridge
added links pointing to Chris Bishop and Cam River
1943 Nigerian general election
added a link pointing to Efik

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darwin College Boat Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Waterloo, Sierra Leone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oku.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Christian Cole article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 09:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Rosolu Bankole Thompson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://rscsl.org/Trial_Chamber_I.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sennecaster (What now?) 15:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darwin College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pelé, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Victor Okrafo-Smart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NAUTHOR. Been on the cat:nn list for more than 10 years and never been updated. Unable to locate reviews. Obscure. Only valid ref is a profile on local Nottingham radio interview. No other coverage. Book seems to be self-published.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creepTalk 18:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oku people (Sierra Leone), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mende and Temne.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Sir Ian Wilmut.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sir Ian Wilmut.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article James Corker has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Chamaemelum (talk) 01:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Race Course Cemetery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Obviously non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chamaemelum (talk) 01:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article William Campbell (Sierra Leone) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Chamaemelum (talk) 01:50, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article William Campbell (Sierra Leone) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Source does not mention subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chamaemelum (talk) 01:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article John William Campbell (Sierra Leone) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Deputy Mayor is the member who is appointed to act as Mayor in the absence or incapacity of the Mayor. Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chamaemelum (talk) 01:57, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sherbro Tuckers for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sherbro Tuckers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherbro Tuckers (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

If contesting, please state in the discussion what reliable sources provide significant coverage. Thanks. --Bejnar (talk) 17:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:EldredDJones.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:EldredDJones.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:40, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:BernardFrazer.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:BernardFrazer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Thomas Roberts for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Thomas Roberts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Thomas Roberts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BD2412 T 17:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sierra Leone Creole people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:NAWCox-George.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:NAWCox-George.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prince Harding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]