User talk:Whitetararaj

Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message.

If I have left a message on your talk page, please reply here; I am watching it.
If you leave a message here I will reply it.
If you have any complaint, Sorry! I am not an administrator.

February 2012

Welcome!

Hello, Whitetararaj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! DocTree (ʞlɐʇ · cont) Join WER 15:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kottayam district (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Puthuppally

Panamattom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pala

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Panamattom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ponkunnam Damodaran

The article Ponkunnam Damodaran has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Lego K^ontribs T^alkM 17:35, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Non-free content policy and guideline

Please do not place or replace any non-free images to any pages except for actual articles, as you did at Template:User Chennai Super Kings 1. Such use is a clear violation of point number 9 of our policy concerning the use of non-free images. Continuing to do so can be viewed as disruptive behaviour and you may be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:27, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Chennai Super Kings 1

Please do not put copyrighted logos in user boxes as you have repeated done and been warned about above. The use of copyrighted logos is actually illegal under US Copyright law, and because Wikipedia's servers are located in Florida, US law applies. Since you have now been warned about this twice, future attempts to insert copyrighted logos into user boxes will be treated as vandalism. - Ahunt (talk) 23:37, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see by your user page that you are one of our younger Wikipedians. If you are having trouble understanding the policy on copyrighted logos, please drop me a note! - Ahunt (talk) 23:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello, I'm Ahunt. I noticed that you recently removed some content from User :Ahunt without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ahunt (talk) 10:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Baghdad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Capital City

Jubail (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Muscat

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mr. Marumakan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sai Kumar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:57, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Indian film actors, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vijayaraghavan and Suresh Krishna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jubail

I've reverted your edits to Jubail. First, you can't ask a question in an article. Second, we are not a tourist guide, so we don't create big lists of hotels or other tourist spots. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:46, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, I'm Sitush. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to User:Qwyrxian because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Sitush (talk) 15:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ashokan (actor)

Hello,

Are pages Ashokan (actor) and Harisree Ashokan referring to the same person? Gjs238 (talk) 13:30, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Both are having Ashokan in their names. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitetararaj (talk • contribs) 14:47, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, but are they the same person, i.e., are there two Wikipedia articles about the same person? If yes, perhaps they should be merged. (PS: Please reply here to maintain message continuity.) Gjs238 (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Please note that edit warring is not allowed. If you wish to discuss that content, please go to Talk:Jubail and we can see if there is consensus based on policy to include it. Simply trying to force your way is called edit warring, and will eventually result in your account being blocked. I'm sorry if you don't like Wikipedia's rules, but we are an encyclopedia, we do have rules, and you must follow them to edit here. You can't just add anything you want because you think it's interesting or helpful. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:39, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history at Jubail shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --regentspark (comment) 17:12, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whiterataj, will you please come discuss the matter? I will try to explain more about why that content simply is not allowed on Wikipedia, but you can't just keep re-adding it. You clearly have a lot to offer Wikipedia, but if you won't follow our policies, you're going to be blocked. That would be a shame. I want to help you be a better user. Part of that means knowing that some types of information are allowed and some are not. Please look at point 2 in WP:NOTTRAVEL. WP:NOT is one of our core policies, and is critical to us maintaining Wikipedia as an encyclopedia. Please, remove your own additions of hotels to that article. But if you try to re-add, one more time, I will ask for you to be blocked. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:07, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Sitush, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Qwyrxian (talk) 15:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kalyanappittannu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mukesh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of hospitals in India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mercy Hospital and Good Samaritan Hospital

April 10 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Magician

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ramesh Pisharody

The article Ramesh Pisharody has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 07:54, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Thirunakkara Sree Mahadevar Temple, Kottayam. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 11:35, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your personal information

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. I am an administrator here, and someone drew my attention to your user page. Please read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors, particularly the section headed "Your safety and security". It is very unwise for someone as young as you to reveal publicly on the Internet details like your name and school and family members, so I have removed them from your user page, and I advise you strongly not to replace them.

Beside your claim to be the youngest Wikipedian I have put a "citation needed" tag. That is a sort of joke, referring to Wikipedia's WP:Verifiability policy: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source." Your claim to be the youngest Wikipedian could never be verified unless someone checked the ages of all the millions of other registered users, and in fact it is not true because I know of at least one other who is, or claims to be, younger than you. I suggest you remove the claim, or alter it to read "one of the youngest... " which is probably true - then you could remove the tag.

I am sorry to have to alter your user page, but Wikipedia is not a social-networking site, your user page is intended for things to do with your Wikipedia work (see WP:UPNOT, and we take users' safety and security very seriously. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:03, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to message on my talk page: ask your parents to read these messages, and to read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. If they are then happy for you to replace the user-box, I will not remove it again. But I still advise against it, and it may still be that someone else will remove it, because (a) we do not like to see personal details of young people published, and (b) user pages are not for "substantial content... that is unrelated to Wikipedia". JohnCD (talk) 14:12, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Massive copyright violations

Hello. I was just looking at your new article Kaduthruthy Mahadeva Temple. Did you just copy paste the entire thing from this website?

http://www.thekeralatemples.com/templeinfo/siva/kaduthuruthy_mahadeva.htm

Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:25, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And Paippad Puthenkavu Bhagavathi Temple from http://www.paippadputhenkavu.org/ Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:27, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And Thirunakkara Sree Mahadevar Temple, Kottayam from http://www.thirunakkaratemple.org/History.html Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:34, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploaded images

And please explain where you got this image File:Kottayam_Nazeer.jpeg Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:35, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And this image: File:Rajendran.jpg Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:35, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And this image: File:Ramesh Pisharody.jpeg, which you also uploaded as your own work, which as a METROMATINEE.COM watermark. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:37, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that almost all images you uploaded are not owned by you, and almost all the content on all the articles you created was simply copy pasted from other sites. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:39, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have just requested that all of your Wikicommons images be deleted. Many were deleted before, and you knew it, but uploaded more images that you obviously don't own. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:52, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Update

I just removed most of the content from most of the articles you created. Some at Panamattom may have been fine, but I removed it anyway. Restore what you think is not copy paste.

Please do not copy paste content again, and do not upload images that you do not own again. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:02, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Further comments

Other than that, you seem to be a good editor and do valuable work. I see a lot of "..." Please just use a comma or nothing at all. A string of full stops isn't really conventional. And, please use edit summaries.

Please don't be put off by the copyvio thing. Just don't do it anymore, and carry on with other good edits. Okay? :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:51, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

I was justified in deleting your copyright violations. Please don't go though the articles I started and delete stuff. I don't copy paste. Please stop. Don't be upset. I'm sorry. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. 21:22, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kottayam Nazeer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Muscat

M. D. Rajendran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Black Stallion

Ramesh Pisharody (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Positive (film)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles and referencing

When you are creating articles, could you look to provide at least one reliable source as a reference, as per Wikipedia policy? It really isn't enough just to create an unreferenced article that merely asserts that something is "very famous". AllyD (talk) 12:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've just tagged three more newly created articles because they don't have one single reference between them; not one. Please read WP:SOURCE. AllyD (talk) 21:47, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Mother (film)

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Grand Mother (film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://allmoviedatabase.com/KMDB.asp?movieName=Grand%20Mother.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 17:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You must stop violating copyright

Whitetararaj, you must not copy material into Wikipedia. It could cause serious legal problems. You have been warned about this before: if you do it again, you may be blocked from editing. JohnCD (talk) 17:40, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paippad Puthenkavu Bhagavathi Temple

The article Paippad Puthenkavu Bhagavathi Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable temple. It is also unreferenced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starship9000 (talk) 22:15, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shivaji Guruvayoor

The article Shivaji Guruvayoor has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Altered Walter (talk) 12:50, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jubail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Others (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lazza Ice Cream Factory, Panamattom

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lazza Ice Cream Factory, Panamattom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Harry the Dog WOOF 17:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Viyyoor Shiva Temple

The article Viyyoor Shiva Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article with no evidence that the subject is notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 20:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pisharikavu Temple

The article Pisharikavu Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article with no evidence that the subject is notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 20:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Viyyoor Shiva Temple. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Adding a link to the Google Maps front page is in no possible way demonstrating Notability or providing a reference for an article. AllyD (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about my edits to your user page

Hi, Whitetararaj, you'll likely not be pleased about this but I have suppressed a number of edits to your userspace which reveal too much personally identifiable information about yourself. I've done this per policy and for your own protection and safety on-line as you are a self-declared minor. I'm really sorry about that and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add it. For some useful information on privacy and safety, take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages - Avi (talk) 00:22, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wandoor Siva Temple

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Wandoor Siva Temple requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. PamD 16:51, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sachin Warrier

The article Sachin Warrier has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AllyD (talk) 17:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Wandoor Siva Temple

Hi Whitetararaj, you recently removed a deletion tag from Wandoor Siva Temple. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 11:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Midhunappilli Shiva Temple

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Midhunappilli Shiva Temple requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. PamD 15:17, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ponnambalamedu

The article Ponnambalamedu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and doesn't make sense.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 23:03, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ponnambalamedu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ponnambalamedu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ponnambalamedu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PamD 09:05, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

final warning

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at multiple articles , you will be blocked from editing without further notice.

Adding material in the way you are doing harms Wikipedia. , because it diverts the time and energy of others into dealing with the necessary sourcing. You could do it better: you must have some information in front of you when you add them, though apparently it is often only their website or a listing in a film database.

For films, this is not enough to establish notability,and unless someone goes to the trouble of finding proper information such as reviews, the articles will be removed. see WP:NOTFILM Buildings such as temples are not necessarily notable either--it depends on their significance, and the significance must be proven by sources--see WP:NGEO For secondary schools , we normally keep those for which we have reliable information of existence, but this is only a custom, not a formal guideline, and what you are doing might lead to another result for these.

On one of the article talk pages, you say your goal is to achieve 100 new articles. this is not a goal helpful to the encyclopedia; what would be helpful is to write 10, or even 1 acceptable article with reliable references for notability , references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or the subjects' web sites. DGG ( talk ) 20:32, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kaniyanparambil Temple, Panamattom

The article Kaniyanparambil Temple, Panamattom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find no sources, and it is not assumed temples are notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 20:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kavummuri Temple, Panamattom

The article Kavummuri Temple, Panamattom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find no sources, and temples are not necessarily notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 20:58, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Red Salute (film)

The article Red Salute (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 21:03, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mimics Action 500 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chippy

Red Salute (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vijayaraghavan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammad Tahir-ul-Qadri

Hello, I was wondering what your intent was with this edit to Talk:Mohammad Tahir-ul-Qadri. The {{edit semi-protected}} tag is only to be used on the talk pages of articles that are semi-protected, by users who are blocked from editing semi-protected articles (i.e., unregistered users and non-autoconfirmed registered users), to request that an edit be made to the article. As far as I can tell, the article has never been semi-protected, and even if it was you should be able to edit it yourself.

Looking through the article history I see edits that may be interpreted as vandalism; however, I do not know enough about the subject matter to know whether or not it is. If your intent was to request semi-protection for this article, you need to make such a request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My first comment above also applies to your recent edits to Talk:Twenty:20, and it looks like you went through the proper channels to get it semi-protected. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:52, 17 January 2013 (UTC) edited 15:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nariyah

Thanks for contributing the new article Nariyah. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding sources to the article you created and by making it clear how the sources support the material. See here for how to do inline referencing. Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vaishak Uthaman

Hello Whitetararaj,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vaishak Uthaman for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 13:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Vaishak Uthaman

Hi Whitetararaj, you recently removed a deletion tag from Vaishak Uthaman. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 14:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Last Warning

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, like you did at Kinnaripuzhayoram, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Suraj T 12:48, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nariyah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Province (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Poovattoor Bhagavathy Temple

The article Poovattoor Bhagavathy Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this temple is notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ponnambalamedu

On 26 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ponnambalamedu, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the ritual of lighting Makaravilakku atop the Indian summit of Ponnambalamedu is witnessed from Sabarimala by nearly half a million people annually? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ponnambalamedu. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wii Vacation Sports

Hello, Whitetararaj. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Wii Vacation Sports, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Op47 (talk) 20:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rose Rock IFC

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rose Rock IFC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 16:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Samatra TV Tower

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LlamaAl (talk) 16:45, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Pattabhishekam

Hello, Whitetararaj,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Pattabhishekam should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pattabhishekam .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Red Salute (film)

Hello, Whitetararaj,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Red Salute (film) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Salute (film) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, I'm Vivvt. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to National Film Award for Best Actor because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! - Vivvt • (Talk) 13:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kerala Strikers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mollywood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage (please read carefully)

I have just removed and deleted a lot of content from your userpage because it revealed too much personal information about you. On Wikpedia, we have a policy about the privacy of self-declared minors and we care about your safety on-line. Another oversighter has previously had to remove this sort of information from your userpage but you have re-added most of it; therefore, I must warn you that if you add any more sensitive information about your real-life to your userpage or another Wikipedia page, you will be asked to leave Wikipedia and blocked from editing for your own safety.

When you add information to Wikipedia in future, you must ask yourself "would I want every person, good and bad, in the world to know this information?". If you would not, do not add the information. I cannot stress how important it is that you not do this again. Warmest regards, AGK [•] 18:55, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sachin Tendulkar India.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Sachin Tendulkar India.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sanju Samson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Table coding is not appropriate for most circumstances

The manual of style is clear. Table formatting should only be used when necessary. Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Tables Please stop inserting the [unnecessarily complicated and user unfriendly] table coding unnecessarily. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:04, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,I really appreciate the work you have done on the article Eecha. User:Flowers of the world (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:57, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

good job

Flowers of the world (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ahmed Khoory Tower

Hi, I'm Anne Delong. Whitetararaj, thanks for creating Ahmed Khoory Tower!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more information and sources about this tower. Who is building it? What interesting features will it have? Who is the architect? etc. Thanks, and good luck with your editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 02:33, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

I want your help

Did you see that JK is removing the source from article Kunchacko Boban. he is a fan of dileep he change source from kunchacko boban and he promoting dileep «»[1]«» Merenjith (talk • contribs) 08:07, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets of TheRedPenOfDoom

I think UserTheRedPenOfDoom have multiple accounts. here proof[2] i don't no how to report this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merenjith (talk • contribs) 17:41, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wii Vacation Sports

The article Wii Vacation Sports has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only hit in WP:VG/RS search is a single review from Cheat Code Central (fails significant coverage criteria for inclusion). Article topic doesn't pass the search engine test for notability (the GNG).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar · · 01:08, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Aryankuzhi Ganapathy Temple.

I find [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aryankuzhi_Ganapathy_Temple&action=history your edits to Aryankuzhi Ganapathy Temple perplexing. Why would you engage in a string of edits where you add information, tags, and so forth by adding one letter with each edit? It seems like an awful waste of time, and a disruption of the page for the time that it is going on. bd2412 T 16:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angel John, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vijayaraghavan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hitwicket (Online Strategy Game)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hitwicket (Online Strategy Game), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Panamattom concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Panamattom, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mazhavilkoodaram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nandu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aapka uploaded naam whitetararaj kese hua aur kyun. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.37.224.62 (talk) 16:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pedro Gusmao

The article Pedro Gusmao has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hitwicket Game, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Virat Kohli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dharmashala. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ISL finals

Lets make sure the page is organized please? I know I am sounding like a dick but I am just not in a mood right now. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 18:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vineethamayi Apekshikkunnu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mollywood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ian Lawlor

The article Ian Lawlor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Player fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:FPL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 18:03, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited M. S. Dhoni: The Untold Story, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Abraham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of highest-grossing Indian films page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kaniyanparambil Temple, Panamattom

The article Kaniyanparambil Temple, Panamattom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of notability failing WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kuzhikattu Temple, Panamattom

The article Kuzhikattu Temple, Panamattom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of notability failing WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Panamattom Devi Temple

The article Panamattom Devi Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of notability failing WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vadakara Temple, Panamattom

The article Vadakara Temple, Panamattom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of notability failing WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Veliyannur Ayyappa Temple, Panamattom

The article Veliyannur Ayyappa Temple, Panamattom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of notability failing WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey...thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saranishere (talk • contribs) 12:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Lankan cricket team in India in 2015–16

Hi. Note that the total runs/wickets for the series is updated at the end of the series. This is true for all current tours. Please check SA/Eng and NZ/Aus as examples. If you disagree, please raise it at WT:CRIC. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 14:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ustad Hotel. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff: [3] You've been around Wikipedia long enough to have read our guidelines on reliable sources. Random blogs don't qualify. See also WP:UGC and please keep to mainstream sources with established reputations for fact-checking. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 29 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Ennu Ninte Moideen page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hi, it would be very helpful if you would please start using edit summaries. Here you've reordered cast without a valid explanation, leaving me to wonder if you are editing consistently with WP:FILMCAST or if you're just arbitrarily ordering the cast. Edit summaries are crucial as first steps of communication between editors. If you look though my edit history you'll see that it is extraordinarily rare that I edit without leaving a note. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ennu Ninte Moideen - character appearances

Hi there, regarding this edit, while I know you meant well, it's not clear to me why we're devoting time to describing their appearances without providing sourced context. The content you've added, while maybe true, includes interpretive analysis, like describing someone's hazel eyes as a "peculiarity", or describing "typical" Indian hairstyles and "traditional" mustaches. There are also some grammar issues that made it difficult to understand what you were trying to communicate, for instance: "She has a great sense of boldness, which allowed her collegemates to have good food" It's unclear how boldness yields good food. "who was always against his son, due to rival political parties' members" it's unclear if the father and son were from rival political parties. I think that real-world context is good (actually, it's required per WP:FILMCAST, but the analyses need to come from reliable published sources, not our own memories. I've reverted the edit, but please know it's nothing personal. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:41, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anarkali (2015 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suresh Krishna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pinneyum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romantic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elamgulam Sree Dharma Shastha Temple

The article Elamgulam Sree Dharma Shastha Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 3 years, non-notable local temple failing WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:19, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ennakkappally Devi Temple

The article Ennakkappally Devi Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 3 years, non-notable local temple failing WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:20, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karppooradeepam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shari. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Estimation template belongs in gross line

Hi there, a quick note re: this edit. The {{Estimation}} template belongs in the gross field per consensus at WT:ICTF (see archives). There was a note to that effect in the gross field prior to your edit. It would be appreciated if you'd please keep/add the template. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:11, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chirakodinja Kinavukal

added a link pointing to G. K. Pillai

Nadirshah

added a link pointing to Manorama

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Two Countries does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Diff: [4] Reordering cast without providing an explanation tends to look like you're reordering according to some arbitrary, personal preference. Please be sure to explain your edits so other editors understand your rationale. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Your edit here is disruptive. As previously noted, you are reordering cast without providing a valid explanation. Since we are not here to entertain your personal preferences, you need to provide an explanation that conforms with MOS:FILM. If you submit the changes again without adequate explanation, it will be considered a continuation of disruption. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:27, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Passive-aggressive note

Care to explain your passive-aggressive note? [5] If you continue to make unexplained and arbitrary changes like this, your editing privileges will be interrupted. It's really very simple: explain your edits and be sure they conform to established guidelines. Since you don't actually seem to want to engage in discussion, you leave me with little option but to scold you. In case you're having trouble putting my requests in perspective, let me assist: the community has had problems with disruptive users who reorder cast because they happen to personally like Actor A over Actor B, for instance this guy, who kept making changes to cast lists and prose to place Mohanlal before Mammootty every chance he could. Since there are existing guidelines for how cast should be ordered Template:Infobox film and MOS:FILM, we should be following that, not making changes based on personal preference. I strongly advise you start communicating. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Hi again, there are at least six links to WP:RS on your talk page, and ten links to WP:V#sources, yet you still make changes like these attributed to faceless blogs with no established reputation for fact-checking, and no clear editorial policy. This leads me to two conclusions: 1) For some reason you have never familiarized yourself with our reliable sources guidelines in 4 years and 4,000+ edits. 2) You are familiar with our reliable sources guidelines, but continue to add poor references for some reason known only to you. Either way, your edits are not consistent with our long-standing guidelines. Please quickly familiarize yourself with WP:RS and WP:UGC. The latter makes it clear that user-generated content like discussion forums, website comment sections, IMDb, wikis, and blogs are not sufficient as references, since anyone can generate content in these environments and claim to be an expert on a subject. Please consider this your final warning about reliable sourcing. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:01, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Though I'm impressed that you finally chose to use an edit summary here, it still appears that you are using blogs instead of mainstream sources like Times of India, the Hindustani Times, The Hindu, and so forth. Again, please familiarize yourself with WP:RS and WP:UGC. If you want to argue that either or both references are sufficient, feel free to open a discussion at Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films, but we don't automatically assume that sources are reliable just because they exist. And thankfully, Wikipedia has no deadline, so we're not in any hurry. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:22, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mudhugauv, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abu Salim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aadu Jeevitham

The article Aadu Jeevitham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per WP:TOOSOON and WP:NFF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Charles Turing (talk) 19:44, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone who edits film articles, and especially anyone who creates film articles should be aware that the basic threshold for the existence of a future film is WP:NFF. You must demonstrate that principal photography has started, since films are planned and shelved all the time, like Faisal Saif's For Adults Only. Any film article for an upcoming film that does not demonstrate that the basic notability standard has been met, drains community resources. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please stop adding poorly sourced content, as you did to List of most expensive Indian films. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff: [6] The link does not resolve, which is problematic, but even if it did, Facebook should not be used as a source for controversial information, like a film's financial details. Even if the information came from the producer, that would constitute a primary source, which is unsuitable for financial data. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suraj Venjaramoodu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mukesh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely for your death threat. We do not tolerate such behaviour. Note that this block applies to you; you are not permitted to set up any other account to get around this block. Any evidence of this will result in a block of those accounts and may likely result in a revert of all edits. --Yamla (talk) 16:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, please hear me. I don't know what is happening. You saying I was threatning him. My Section was written 'death'? I dont know how it went like that! Now I checked it. You are very very much wrong on me. I wrote it 'Dear'. Did you note the last sentence? 'Kettoda Bullshit' means 'I was a bul shit at that time (during the edit)'. I did all those things in my opinion it was correct. Even 'Ente Kayyil ninnayirikkum ninte anthiyam' means 'I won't do it again it was my fault.' My english was weak there as I am a South indian. I mean't this is a last warning (for me). I wrote threatning as I thought it had a similar meaning with that. I am sorry with that. That word I wrote without knowing its exact meaning costed me my life, my WikiPedia. This is my life, I can't liv without it, please unblock me Sir. I just wanted to be friend with Charles Turing. After my schooling I wanted to become an officer in Wikipedia, so I was going to study Software Engineering. I am a 9th grade. Do you think I can threat such a user. You can ask User:JohnCD about me. He usually reverted my edits and I done the same. But I wanted him as a friend if you check his talk page. Please I want justice. I had done nothing wrong. You know I am crying. My family teases me 'Wiki' as I am so addicted to Wikipedia. Please don't wet my eyes. I have a skype account. If you come there I will explain you about what I have done. So please Unblock me dude. Seriously, I am crying now. Please unblock me. I am a potenital user here. I have created 85+ articles here and more than 5000 edit. --Whitetararaj (talk) 22:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whitetararaj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Poor English and mistake while writing costed me blocking in wikipedia. I am innocent please don't block me forever

Decline reason:

→ Based on what you've said here and the threat, I don't see how you have the competence required to contribute to the English Wikipedia. only (talk) 23:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please don't say that sir. I don't know what happened. This is very cruel sir. I am innocent to my core of heart. Why do you want to punish an innocent, sir? Please remember that 'Even if a 1000 convicts escape, no no innocents should be punished.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whitetararaj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dont know what happened. I am innocent. Poor English and mistake while writing costed my account in my future, Wikipedia. Please take a look into this. I am innocent to the core of my heart. Please dont make me cry again. Even my parents call me Wiki due to my addiction to my wikipedia. If you punish me, you punish an innocent and lose the future potential user of Wikipedia. I just wanted to be friends with Charles Turing. Like JohnCD, he was just a friend to me. I wrote 'Dear' but came as 'Death' probably because of the suggestion box above my keyboard (from mobile). 'Ente Kayyil ninnayirikkum ninte anthyam' means It was my fault and I wont do it again. And 'Kettoda bullshit' means I was a bullshit that time (while editing). I just wanted to be friends with Charles Turing. These all made it to an unknown and a subject that i havent even thought of that is Death Threat. My dear sir, I was going to work for Wikipedia after my schooling. I have done only 1 wrong, i.e, I revereted those edits who reverted my edits. It was a mistake. I wont do it any more. Please don't make me blocked. The helpful edits that I have to WiliPedia would become meaningless If you block me. But I am innocent. I swear I prove not guitly. I need justice. I didn't expected this from Wikipedia. This is my life, please unblock me. I can't see my user page written 'This User is blocked from Wikipedia'. Without any reason, you have blocked me from Wikipedia. I am crying now. Dont know why! I have a lot of tolerance. But it is uncontrollable now. Can't stop crying, my life, Wikipedia. Please Please unblock this innocent. I will have a big rock in my chest, if you block me forever. If you unblock me, I will contribute a lot of articles, and referenceful contributions to my life Wikipedia. So please unblock me my beloved admins.

Decline reason:

This is a pretty serious miscommunication. If you are making accidental death threats then this is a competency issue. HighInBC 05:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whitetararaj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dont know what happened. I am innocent. Poor English and mistake while writing costed my account in my future, Wikipedia. Please take a look into this. I am innocent to the core of my heart. Please dont make me cry again. Even my parents call me Wiki due to my addiction to my wikipedia. If you punish me, you punish an innocent and lose the future potential user of Wikipedia. I just wanted to be friends with Charles Turing. Like JohnCD, he was just a friend to me. I wrote 'Dear' but came as 'Death' probably because of the suggestion box above my keyboard (from mobile). 'Ente Kayyil ninnayirikkum ninte anthyam' means It was my fault and I wont do it again. And 'Kettoda bullshit' means I was a bullshit that time (while editing). I just wanted to be friends with Charles Turing. These all made it to an unknown and a subject that i havent even thought of that is Death Threat. My dear sir, I was going to work for Wikipedia after my schooling. I have done only 1 wrong, i.e, I revereted those edits who reverted my edits. It was a mistake. I wont do it any more. Please don't make me blocked. The helpful edits that I have to WiliPedia would become meaningless If you block me. But I am innocent. I swear I prove not guitly. I need justice. I didn't expected this from Wikipedia. This is my life, please unblock me. I can't see my user page written 'This User is blocked from Wikipedia'. Without any reason, you have blocked me from Wikipedia. I am crying now. Dont know why! I have a lot of tolerance. But it is uncontrollable now. Can't stop crying, my life, Wikipedia. Please Please unblock this innocent. I will have a big rock in my chest, if you block me forever. If you unblock me, I will contribute a lot of articles, and referenceful contributions to my life Wikipedia. So please unblock me my beloved admins.

Decline reason:

You have made a clear death threat in Malayalam, what you typed translates to "Your end is in my hand." If you continue with this sort of frivolous reasoning in your unblock requests, I or another admin will remove your talk page access. —SpacemanSpiff 08:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is happening here? Why are you all blocking me from WikiPedia? What have I done? Death threat? Do you know this is the biggest ever misunderstanding that I have ever seen. I need justice. I need justice. Is WikiPedia a place without any justice? This was my life, Wikipedia. I will fight till my death as I love Wikipedia a lot. Why should I, an innocent, request someone not to punish? This is called injustice. This was my no, This is my favourite site, and I don't know why are they giving me this much hard time. What have I done to you all? What are you all saying? I threatened one that too death threat. Can a 9th grader threaten anyone? There was no such complaints against me in these 4 years in Wikipedia. I loved the site that I am a part of it from my 5th grade onwards. Block me, if you are cruel and injustice. Unblock me, If you are kind and know what happened, I will be a good user to Wikipedia. This is my request please look into this. --Whitetararaj (talk) 08:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What should I do to enter Wikipedia again? Should I say Charles Turing sorry? I will say it, no problem! It was my mistake. I won't repeat it again. Every mistake will be forgived once, isn't it? I won't repeat in again. Please unblock me in the categories Edit and move. I lose my temper that time. Please unblock me.

Since you are now repeating yourself I have removed talk page access. You can appeal at WP:UTRS if you want. HighInBC 15:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Whitetararaj. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Whitetararaj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18283 was submitted on May 16, 2017 11:20:56. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 11:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kudamaloor Devi Temple

The article Kudamaloor Devi Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No actual claim of significance as to why it's "famous", no sources located.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:54, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ammaavanu Pattiya Amali

The article Ammaavanu Pattiya Amali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sree Maha Ganapathi Temple, Pazhavangadi

The article Sree Maha Ganapathi Temple, Pazhavangadi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any indication this is any more notable than any other Hindu temple, on a search. Yes this is a search of only English sources, but there's no native-language name given to look for!

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Midhunappilli Shiva Temple

The article Midhunappilli Shiva Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any indication this is any more notable than any other Hindu temple, on a search. Yes this is a search of only English sources, but there's no native-language name given to look for! Creator made a swath of such articles before being blocked in 2016, all with the same issues.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:03, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"God's Own Village" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect God's Own Village. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 31#God's Own Village until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pattabhishekam (1999 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pattabhishekam (1999 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pattabhishekam (1999 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 13:43, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International Indian School, Al-Jubail

The article International Indian School, Al-Jubail has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia:Notability issues, clearly being edited by someone with ties to the school because the names of key staff keep getting added back in. Article was temp protected, when the temp protection wore off it was reverted to the old version. Just delete this page and mention the school on Al-Jubail if it warrants it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katanga TV Tower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katanga TV Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katanga TV Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ironmatic1 (talk) 07:57, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Samatra TV tower

The article Samatra TV tower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable structure, fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironmatic1 (talk) 12:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Government Higher Secondary School Panamattom

The article Government Higher Secondary School Panamattom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uncited with no notability per WP:SCHOOL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:44, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mumbai Heroes

The article Mumbai Heroes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Celebrity cricket teams are not notable. This is an encyclopedia, not a collection of trivial nonsense.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]