User talk:Merenjith

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles. SRM 2 HRM (talk) 10:58, 30 March 2013‎ (UTC)

Merenjith, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Merenjith! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm Jayakrishnan.ks100. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mammootty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JK (talk) 07:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You got it wrong. Read WP:BLP which states,

"Contentious material about living persons (or in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material :is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion."

Also read WP:burden.

JK (talk) 07:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kathovo. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Mammootty with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Kathovo talk 12:39, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kunchacko Boban with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Kathovo talk 12:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Edit warring to remove tags without ensuring that all content is in fact sourced to reliable sources is not acceptable. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:50, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last and only warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Kunchacko Boban. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 15:07, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

editwarring to remove the tags from articles while there are still claims sourced to sites like iloveindia or wordpress blogs is an action that WILL get you blocked. Please concentrate your efforts on actually addressing the concerns and not removing tags that are still applicable. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:48, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohanlal filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dileep (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and understand WP:RS and WP:NPOV

Thank you for at least putting in "sources" for your edits, however based on your edit summary description of this edit you seem to have zero grasp of reliable sources and WP:NPOVPlease read the policies fully until you understand them before you try to edit again. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:08, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:45, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]