Jump to content

User talk:United States Man/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 10


Re: Joplin tornado

I think it may be worth noting that the EF5 rating was put into question; however, since NWS Springfield followed up and stated that the tornado was still considered EF5, I don't think it warrants being "colored" as a possibly not being of such intensity. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 03:11, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter

We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions) claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions) was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to Poland Piotrus (submissions) for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, New South Wales Casliber (submissions) and Canada Sasata (submissions) being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

April 25–28, 2011 tornado outbreak FAC

I'll just be upfront about this, this article is not ready for FAC and truly shouldn't be a GA either, in my opinion. I suggest that you withdraw the article from FAC and take a good look at it. There are numerous issues across the board with this article and it would take an unreasonable amount of effort to fix them up within the time it would be at FAC. I personally have major issues with the haphazard focus of the article, namely the meteorological synopsis. For April 27, I see no mention of the three waves of activity that occurred that day, most notably a complete lack of mention of the MCS in the early morning. Information within this section as a whole is mostly leftover from reports going on at the time and do not represent the final analyses on the event. As for the notable tornado section, many of these need to be reworked. The Hackleburg tornado's section is grossly overweight, being the exact same size as its sub-article and gives it undue weight. Despite this weight, it's a big hunk of fluff. It's just an excess account of its track and accounts of the damage surveyed.

I could honestly keep going since I have a major bone to pick with this article but it's not worth my time to tear it apart. I'm sorry, but it's just not close to FAC status. If you really want to go further with this article, send it to peer review to be cleaned up first. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:42, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Armoured fighting vehicle

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Armoured fighting vehicle. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Yarnell Hill Fire

Hello! I see that you deleted the partial quotes which had been added to the "reaction" section of this article. Actually there was a consensus developing at the talk page that a single-sentence quote or paraphrase from Obama and Brewer would be acceptable. Please weigh in there; I for one would like to restore the short quotes you deleted, and was in the process of tidying them up when I got an edit-conflict which was your deletion. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 03:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: Can you please explain this?

About the edit on the 2013 Pacific hurricane season page...I was putting in that Dalila had become a hurricane. I did not realize I had copied extra sentences from above. I apologize that occured. Hurricane Andrew (444) 20:38, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

Please comment on Talk:Panchen Lama

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Panchen Lama. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Big One (NASCAR) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Cassill, and Gilliland) were swept up as the others cars began the spin down into the infield) and another (Hamlin) spun out by himself and sustained front-end damage. [[Travis Kvapil]], [[Greg

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:55, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on April 25–28, 2011 tornado outbreak. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Please stop sending me messages

Um, no i'm not currently a violator of those rules. Maybe in the past I have, but not none of those apply this edit in any way shape or form. I'm simply trying to keep the info accurate, and I haven't violated ANY of those rules so that is a pointless message that you just sent me.

Though regarding the 1942 tornado, I will compromise and leave the title alone, but mention Lacon in the description. I have to ask, do you actually know anything about this particular tornado? The reason I ask, is that it is a well documented fact that this tornado struck the town of Lacon, sweeping away several homes and destroying much of the town. Why list only the counties? The 1977 Bham tornado isn't listed as "Jefferson County, AL" , and the 2011 El Reno-Piedmont tornado isn't listed as "Canadian-Kingfisher County, OK". Explain to me why I can only list the counties in this case, and not the town that was impacted? Sharkguy05 (talk) 05:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Sharkguy05 Sharkguy05 (talk) 05:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Sharkguy05

Please comment on Talk:Technical (vehicle)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Technical (vehicle). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

Please comment on Talk:Fabrika automobila Priboj

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fabrika automobila Priboj. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Untitled

United States Man,

Your edit is clearly not from a "neutral point of view" (NPOV) in accordance with Wikipedia's written policy, but is completely biased in favor of one individual and their action in the controversy, which is not constructive at all. If you can reword my edit to be more constructive and neutral, then fine.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view

Please don't threaten me for violating Wikipedia's policy by making a legitimate referenced contribution on here. I will be more than happy to have your edits on here, and your hostile actions toward me, both reviewed by a Wikipedia administrative board. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anviltops (talk • contribs) 07:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Dakota

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Dakota. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

Please comment on Talk:Child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Toluca Lake, Los Angeles

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Toluca Lake, Los Angeles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

The Big One (NASCAR)

I have reverted your recent edits to this article, which is still in need of attention. The subject of the article is the term The Big One" and therefore should contain;

  • how the term came to be coined
  • a definition of the term and the criteria that a crash must meet to be termed as "The Big One"
  • what causes a "Big One" if there is a source to support that
  • controversy regarding use of the term in marketing
  • notable examples of crashes which meet the criteria for "The Big One"

To be notable the crashes need to be sourced. Adding a long list of crashes with no clear definition of what constitutes "The Big One" and without any sources is original research, and POV. I am happy to help improve this article if you can identify sources that support notability. Flat Out let's discuss it 02:22, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Big One (NASCAR). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 03:03, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

WP:NASCAR Newsletter (July 2013)

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 03:36, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Big One (NASCAR), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ARCA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Please explain your revert.

Please explain your revert. I simply got it from here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.106.183 (talk • contribs) 11:50, 28 July 2013

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Vietnamese)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Vietnamese). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Flossie (2013)

Just next time when you create article, just make sure there is some basic structure before pressing "Save page". Regards. YE Pacific Hurricane 20:46, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

By this he means sufficient content and information from sources outside of RSMCs (news sources). Currently, the only additional information for Flossie are the flash flood watches and generic disaster preparation notices. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:50, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello

I saw that you removed my edit, Thank you, even though I was trying to help expand the article as it requests, I will try to find a more reliable source for it --Grayssake (talk) 20:14, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Forgive me, but if it's the links you're referring to I really don't see the point of using links like [[Inch of mercury|inHg]] when [[inHg]] is a redirect which takes you to the same place. And [[Southwest|SW]] takes you to something which is really a disambiguation page - if you don't like my [[Boxing the compass|SW]] it should surely be [[Cardinal direction#Additional points|SW]] (these probably ought to be merged, but that is another issue).

Oh and BTW your signature is set up wrong - the "talk" link actually points to your "User contributions" page.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 11:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

PS looking at WP:OVERLINK again I wonder whether any of the wind speed and pressure units, or the directions, really merit linking at all. The links are hardly likely to add to the reader's understanding.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 12:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:Days of the year in India

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:Days of the year in India. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

2012 Christmas tornado outbreak

Hi, I am a Good Article Recruiteer and my recruitee have expressed an interest in me modelling it as a review. Would you be ok with this?--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 22:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

This just reminded me...USM, don't forget to update the table to meet the new standards. Probably best to use the format that was created in the 1999 Oklahoma outbreak list since that complies with MOS better than any other version. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 July newsletter

We're halfway through this year's penultimate round, and the competition is moving along well. Pool A's Canada Sasata (submissions) currently leads overall, while Pool B's Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) is second. Both leaders are WikiCup veterans, and both have already scored over 600 points this month. If the round were to end today, London Miyagawa (submissions), with 274 points, would be the lowest-scoring participant to make it through. This indicates that participants will need a score comparable to last year's (573, the highest ever) to qualify for the final. The high scores this year are a testament both to the quality of participants and to the increased focus on significant content (eligible for bonus points) in this year's competition. So far this round, both Sasata and Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) have made up over half of their score through bonus points, with, for example, high importance FA koala earning Sasata a total of 440 points (from a multiplier of 4.4) and high-importance GA sea earning Cwmhiraeth a total of 216 points (from a multiplier of 7.2). Other articles on important topics submitted this round include a featured article on the Norman conquest of England by Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions), and good articles on Nobel laureate in literature Henryk Sienkiewicz, Nobel laureate in physics Hans Bethe, and the noted Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū. These articles are by Poland Piotrus (submissions), Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) and Sturmvogel_66 respectively.

Other than that, there is not much to report! If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:01, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

Tropical Storm Infoboxes (reprise)

The only place that an official gust velocity is given is on the Forecast Advisory, currently as 80 knots; so that must be taken as the direct source for all other units. The relevant calculations are therefore (I use Excel for calculations, BTW):

mph 80 × 1.15078 = 92.0624, rounded to 90
km/h 80 × 1.852 = 148.16, rounded to 150

The fact that the derived mph figure does not then round to the km/h figure is the principal delight of rounded arithmetic.

What kind of number has four digits but no comma? Well, the distances in the NHC's Public Advisories do. Millibar figures do. Distances in Infoboxes have done in the past, as far back as I can find (e.g.[1]). It stops the infoboxes being any wider than they have to be. The Manual of Style says "Numbers with four digits to the left of the decimal point may or may not be delimited (e.g. 1250 or 1,250)."

Be all that as it may, there is one sure way I can avoid causing you any further irritation in the Atlantic or East Pacific in the future. Farewell.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 17:58, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

In the spirit of compromise, do you at least accept my logic on the wind gust speeds?--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 09:18, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kamapitha

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kamapitha. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Dorian track map

I replaced "Track of first tropical phase" with "Track map" because if you look at the map you notice the other tropical phase. ManhattanSandyFurystorm (talk) 16:49, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

What do you mean it's not there???????????? Next to Florida!!!!!! ManhattanSandyFurystorm (talk) 19:50, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Great. ManhattanSandyFurystorm (talk) 20:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

And also, about the chart in the August 2013 tornado article- why did we change the chart? ManhattanSandyFurystorm (talk) 16:54, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

MoS?? ManhattanSandyFurystorm (talk) 16:57, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hendrick Motorsports (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to California 500, Primestar 500, Purolator 500, Goody's Headache Powder 500, Hanes 500, DieHard 500, Miller 500, Budweiser 500, Miller High Life 500, Miller Genuine Draft 400, Advance Auto Parts 500, Goody's 500 and Camping World RV 400
2013 Gobowling.com 400 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Alex Kennedy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

NASCAR

[2] was caused by one of the many bugs by WP:VisualEditor. [3] was where the error was generated. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on File talk:Samesex marriage in USA.svg

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on File talk:Samesex marriage in USA.svg. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2012 Christmas tornado outbreak

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article 2012 Christmas tornado outbreak you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Gilderien -- Gilderien (talk) 13:38, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2013 Cheez-It 355 at The Glen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Michael McDowell
Journey to the Center of the Earth (disambiguation) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to ABC

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:38, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2012 Christmas tornado outbreak

The article 2012 Christmas tornado outbreak you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2012 Christmas tornado outbreak for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Gilderien -- Gilderien (talk) 05:27, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bangladesh Liberation War

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bangladesh Liberation War. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2013 NASCAR Nationwide Series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Michael McDowell
2013 Pure Michigan 400 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Michael McDowell

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bangladesh

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bangladesh. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ashkenazi Jews

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ashkenazi Jews. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

To respond to your rather unnecessarily rude comment about I can update the NASCAR results myself

The article is semi-protected, and I am not qualified to edit such by wikipedia rules.

Bullet50000 (talk) 00:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

WP:NASCAR Newsletter (August 2013)

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 00:20, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Adolf Hitler

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Adolf Hitler. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013 Irwin Tools Night Race may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |[[Carl Edwards||344||374||31

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 August newsletter

This year's final is upon us. Our final eight, in order of last round's score, are:

  1. Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer who has contributed on topics of military history and physics, including a number of high-importance topics. Good articles have made up the bulk of his points, but he has also scored a great deal of bonus points. He has the second highest score overall so far, with more than 3000 points accumulated.
  2. New South Wales Casliber (submissions), another WikiCup veteran who reached the finals in 2012, 2011 and 2010. He writes on a variety of topics including botany, mycology and astronomy, and has claimed the highest or joint highest number of featured articles every round so far this year. He has the third highest score overall, with just under 3000 points accumulated.
  3. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 WikiCup champion, who writes mostly on marine biology. She has also contributed to high-importance topics, seeing huge numbers of bonus points for high-importance featured and good articles. Previous rounds have seen her scoring the most bonus points, with scoring spread across did you knows, good articles and featured articles.
  4. Canada Sasata (submissions), a WikiCup veteran who finished in second place in 2012, and competed as early as 2009. He writes articles on biology, especially mycology, and has scored highly for a number of collaborations at featured article candidates.
  5. Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), the winner of the 2010 competition. His contributions mostly concern Naval history, and he has scored a very large number of points for good articles and good article reviews in every round. He is the highest scorer overall this year, with over 3500 points in total.
  6. Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions), who is competing in the WikiCup for the second time, though this will be her first time in the final. A regular at FAC, she is mostly interested in British medieval history, and has scored very highly for some top-importance featured articles on the topic.
  7. London Miyagawa (submissions), a finalist in 2012 and 2011. He writes on a broad variety of topics, with many of this year's points coming from good articles about Star Trek. Good articles make up the bulk of his points, and he had the most good articles back in round 2; he was also the highest scorer for DYK in rounds 1 and 2.
  8. Scotland Adam Cuerden (submissions) has previously been involved with the WikiCup, but hasn't participated for a number of years. He scores mostly from restoration work leading to featured picture credits, but has also done some article writing and reviewing.

We say goodbye to eight great participants who did not qualify for the final: Poland Piotrus (submissions), Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions), Ohio ThaddeusB (submissions), Michigan Dana boomer (submissions), Prince Edward Island Status (submissions), United States Ed! (submissions), Florida 12george1 (submissions), England Calvin999 (submissions). Having made it to this stage is still an excellent achievement, and you can leave with your heads held high. We hope to see you all again next year. Signups are now open for the 2014 WikiCup, which will begin on 1 January. All Wikipedians, whatever their interest or level of experience, are warmly invited to participate in next year's competition.

This last month has seen some incredible contributions; for instance, Cwmhiraeth's Starfish and Ealdgyth's Battle of Hastings—two highly important, highly viewed pages—made it to featured article status. It would be all too easy to focus solely on these stunning achievements at the expense of those participants working in lower-scoring areas, when in fact all WikiCup participants are doing excellent work. A mention of everything done is impossible, but here are a few: Last round saw the completion of several good topics (on the 1958, 1959 and 1962 Atlantic hurricane seasons) to which 12george1 had contributed. Calvin999 saw "S&M" (song), on which he has been working for several years, through to featured article status on its tenth try. Figureskatingfan continued towards her goal of a broad featured/good topic on Maya Angelou, with two featured and four good articles. ThaddeusB contributed significantly to over 20 articles which appeared on the main page's "in the news" section. Adam Cuerden continued to restore a large number of historical images, resulting in over a dozen FP credits this round alone. The WikiCup is not just about top-importance featured articles, and the work of all of these users is worthy of commendation.

Finally, the usual notices: If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 06:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Genocide of indigenous peoples

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Genocide of indigenous peoples. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

Reversions without basis

We are trying to keep a neutral viewpoint here, and we are not going to just focus on one viewpoint about the damage if there are multiple viewpoints among experts. I don't know why you think a news article from the Weather Channel would hold precedence over the official NWS survey. Just because you don't agree with it personally doesn't mean you get to remove it. Sharkguy05 (talk) 05:06, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Sharkguy05

It is in no way, shape, or form a text-based opinion, because it is a sourced fact. The official NWS Springfield survey map has a solid swath of EF5 damage from St.Johns to the industrial park. That's EF5 damage through more than 3/4 of the city. I'm not backing down on this because I know i'm in the right here. There is NO way we are going to only mention the viewpoint expressed in the weather channel article, which is much less reliable/official than the actual NWS survey. That is not how this website works. You are making your bias way to obvious. Sharkguy05 (talk) 05:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Sharkguy05

Dates

Please dont remove systems and call them gone until they have. While Yutu has weakened into a tropical depression, the JMA still warning on it via their marine warnings available on their website. Oh and im not sure how much more it will be able to be expanded until next year, since the JTWC did not monitor it on their STWA until late Sunday.Jason Rees (talk) 21:16, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

In future Id suggest that you check the latest marine forecast from the JMA and the history of the page, before you decide to accuse me of jumping all over you and telling me that its all my fault that the season effects box had a dissipation date. Also can you please stop adding useless tags to the page since there is an incomplete tag up the top and help to expand the season - its way too much for just a few editors to do.Jason Rees (talk) 21:39, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

Naming conventions for tornado outbreaks

There is currently a discussion ongoing regarding altering the naming conventions for tornado outbreak and tornado outbreak sequence articles. Please feel free to view and comment on the discussion here. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) via User:Ks0awb 22:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC) You are receiving this notice because you are listed as a member of WikiProject Severe Weather. If you would not like to receive future WikiProject Severe Weather notifications, please add your signature at User:Ks0stm/Notify list.

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013 Pacific hurricane season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/tcfaqG.html|at=[http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/G1.html G1) When is hurricane season ?]|author1=Christopher W. Landsea|author2=Neal Dorst|author3=Erica Rule|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:51, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jewish Bolshevism

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jewish Bolshevism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Hurricane Humberto

If you look at the article now it is pretty much the same info I had put in that you labeled as "part of this is untrue and it is entirely unnecessary". It does not bother me as what I said was the truth, what bothers me is that you would jump to the conclusions that the reliable source I used and what I read on the NHC's website were false about it regenerating into a P-T cyclone. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:15, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Genocide of indigenous peoples

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Genocide of indigenous peoples. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

Please comment on Talk:Derry

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Derry. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The White Queen (TV series)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The White Queen (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Calvin

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Calvin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2013

WP:NASCAR Newsletter (September 2013)

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 02:16, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:McCollum memo

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:McCollum memo. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, United States Man. You have new messages at Hurricane Sandy's talk page.
Message added 19:07, 30 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Can you please comment on your decision to go with option B, as Kafziel and Pete are questioning it based on your comments in the December RFC. Thanks Jason Rees (talk) 19:07, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 September newsletter

In 30 days, we will know the identity of our 2013 WikiCup champion. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) currently leads; if that lead is held, she will become the first person to have won the WikiCup twice. Canada Sasata (submissions), Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions)—who has never participated in the competition before—and New South Wales Casliber (submissions) follow. The majority of points in this round have come from a mix of good articles and bonus points. This final round is seeing contributions to a number of highly important topics; recent submissions include Phoenix (constellation) (FA by Casliber), Ernest Lawrence (GA by Hawkeye7), Pinniped, and red fox (both GAs by Sasata).

The did you know (DYK) eligibility criteria have recently changed, meaning that newly passed good articles are accepted as "new" for did you know purposes. However, in the interests of not changing the WikiCup rules mid-competition, please note that only articles eligible for DYK under the old system (that is, newly created articles or 5x expansions) will be eligible for points in this year's WikiCup. We do, however, have time to discuss how this new system will work for next year's competition; a discussion will be opened in due course. On that note, thoughts are welcome on changes you'd like to see for next year. What worked? What didn't work? What would you like to see more of? What would you like to see less of? All Wikipedians, new or old, are also warmly invited to sign up for the 2014 WikiCup.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:42, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Great Dane

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Great Dane. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United States tornadoes from August to October 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:50, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Karen

I put work into the Tropical Storm Karen (2013) as you know. I will leave it for you or someone else to repost. Kennvido (talk) 03:35, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Stop

Continuing to harass me may result in your being blocked from editing. Believe that. Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 04:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

I would recommend this goto WP:ANI there is a dispute here. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:46, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Weather

I see you like weather, me three... You should have been with me when I was a stringer for the stations in Central and North Florida.... you'd had loved it!!!! I drove just after midnight south to New Smyrna Beach, Florida, just south of Daytona, looking for weather as a front was coming though. MY CAR DID A 180 ON U.S. 1...the wind just came out of nowhere... I looked at my buddy who was with me, we stared at each other... and said you okay? We both said yes and UTurned and headed south again...the scanner was going crazy...we were like five miles from NSB as it was getting hit... http://www.srh.noaa.gov/mlb/?n=110297 I was the first on scene and what video and ruin and helped many people with my search light..... no one died thank God. It was great as far a WX goes... be good my fair WX friend.Kennvido (talk) 06:21, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Shark_Island_Extermination_Camp#Requested_move_2

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Shark_Island_Extermination_Camp#Requested_move_2. FOARP (talk) 10:51, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Eastern Front (World War II)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Eastern Front (World War II). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 October 2013

Talkback

Hello, United States Man. You have new messages at I JethroBT's talk page.
Message added 17:13, 7 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I, JethroBT drop me a line 17:13, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:San Salvador Island

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:San Salvador Island. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 October 2013

Please comment on Talk:Petronilla of Aragon

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Petronilla of Aragon. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Sock Puppetry False Claim

Hi there. It has seemed that you have accused my of sock puppetry, due to my loss of my other account. I'd like to say because I did loose my other account, which was paideguinha. I've sent a password request, but since I had a different email, which I forgot now the current password to. paideguinha is my current name for my Youtube and twitter. Apparently, you've accused me of being a person I haven't heard of, which is Earth100. I don't know who he is, but you've said I have used same grammar as Earth100. I've just made "ItsPaide" right now. I'm just about to check Earth100 right currently.

EDIT: So he also is in interest of tropical cyclones too. If I were Earth100, I would've said that Earth100 was my old account, not paideguinha. I used paideguinha for creating articles about stars. Anyway, Earth100 lives in Hong Kong, China apparently. I live in the US in Florida. The only article I've created is in my user page. I would've included all the articles that I've made if I were Earth100. I don't even know how to add photos because my account hasn't been confirmed. Please understand that I am NOT Earth100. I would've said that my old account was Earth100. Thanks. ItsPaide (talk) 21:52, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Bising

Assuming that Bisings section can be expanded out to a level where we are comfortable with keeping it in the main storms section, do we really need to be adding brackets to note that PAGASA named it when we dont do it for CPHC or IMD namings that affect systems in the WPAC. (Abliet in the case of the IMD - there are only 2 cases to worry about Jal and Philyan)Jason Rees (talk) 17:20, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your argument is that too all of us the brackets () show that the Philippines names it while non brackets show that the JMA named it which i can respect, but imo it falls down when you ask does an outsider really know that? Also consider the cases of Jal and Philyan which were named by the IMD does an outsider know that they werent named by the JMA or PAGASA. As for the Other Storms your comments have been noted and tbh im thinking along the same lines and have found a few references that will ease the problem slightly.Jason Rees (talk) 17:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
This is a problem faced by the non NHC side of the project as a whole when there is no name or designation in the origin basin but is named later on. I personally prefer calling such systems by their proper name rather than just Tropical Depression or Tropical Low since we can only do that once per season without having problems with the section title.Jason Rees (talk) 18:57, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Generally speaking i have no problems adding a few details on where it was named to the summary - i think when i did the PTS section for Phailin included a line about it moving into the NIO and it gradually developing into VSCS Phailin.Jason Rees (talk) 19:27, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:VPIN

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:VPIN. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

Please comment on Talk:George Zimmerman

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:George Zimmerman. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:San Pedro, Los Angeles

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:San Pedro, Los Angeles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Re: 1998 tornado

I think it does suggest possible F5/EF5 intensity, and that this tornado lands in the fuzzy area where there is a good chance that experts might disagree on a rating. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Female education and economic development

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Female education and economic development. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

2013 PTS Timeline

Can you check the October section and make sure im on the right tracks with it. Personally I'm not sure about the inclusion of the different SSHWS categories - i think id rather just put TY STY and peak intensity down for JTWC. Regards.Jason Rees (talk) 05:01, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok thanks for the views - im aiming to get it as complete as i can before possibly using it to condense the PTS down.Jason Rees (talk) 05:19, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

WP:NASCAR Newsletter (October 2013)

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Guy Fawkes Night

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Guy Fawkes Night. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 October newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our champion, for the second year running, is Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Our final nine were as follows:

  1. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions)
  2. Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions)
  3. Canada Sasata (submissions)
  4. Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions)
  5. New South Wales Casliber (submissions)
  6. Scotland Adam Cuerden (submissions)
  7. London Miyagawa (submissions)
  8. Poland Piotrus (submissions)
  9. Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions)

All those who reached the final win prizes, and prizes will also be going to the following participants:

  • New South Wales Casliber (submissions) wins the FA prize, for four featured articles in round 4, worth 400 points.
  • Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) wins the GA prize, for 20 good articles in round 3, worth 600 points.
  • Portland, Oregon Another Believer (submissions) wins the FL prize, for four featured lists in round 2, worth 180 points.
  • Scotland Adam Cuerden (submissions) wins the FP prize, for 23 featured pictures in round 5, worth 805 point.
  • Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions) wins the FPo prize, for 2 featured portals in round 3, worth 70 points.
  • Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) wins the topic prize, for a 23-article featured topic in round 5, worth 230 points.
  • Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 79 did you know articles in round 5, worth 570 points.
  • Ohio ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 23 in the news articles in round 4, worth 270 points.
  • United States Ed! (submissions) wins the GAR prize, for 24 good article reviews in round 1, worth 96 points.
  • The judges are awarding the Oddball Barnstar to British Empire The C of E (submissions), for some curious contributions in earlier rounds.
  • Finally, the judges are awarding Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) the Geography Barnstar for her work on sea, now a featured article. This top-importance article was the highest-scoring this year; when it was promoted to FA status, Cwmhiraeth could claim 720 points.

Prizes will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. While it has been an excellent year, errors have opened up the judges' eyes to the need for a third judge, and it is with pleasure that we announce that experienced WikiCup participant Miyagawa will be acting as a judge from now on. We hope you will all join us in welcoming him to the team.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. Brainstorming and discussion remains open for how next year's competition will work, and straw polls will be opened by the judges soon. Those interested in friendly competition may also like to keep an eye on the stub contest, being organised by Casliber. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 01:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Young Justice (TV series)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Young Justice (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

JMA

Please note that the JMA is still monitoring Krosa, as a tropical depression via its warnings headed WWJP25.Jason Rees (talk) 01:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Miniature Australian Shepherd

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Miniature Australian Shepherd. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

MOS:COMMA

As you would have seen, I have opened a new RFC at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style § RFC: Proposed amendment to MOS:COMMA regarding geographical references and dates, which evolved from your recent proposal. Hope you can weigh in and hopefully it more or less reflects what you were trying to achieve. —sroc 💬 08:26, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ghouta chemical attack

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ghouta chemical attack. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Closing RFCs

Just letting you know, when you close an RFC, you also need to delete the {{rfc}} template near the top, otherwise weird stuff happens. —sroc 💬 09:15, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

Please comment on Talk:Craig Breslow

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Craig Breslow. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Eurofighter Typhoon

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Eurofighter Typhoon. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 November 2013

Please comment on Talk:Philippine Military Academy

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Philippine Military Academy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Re: Bolding

We went through this before, and I really don't want to again. The bolding is not necessary and WP:IAR doesn't necessarily apply. I've already obtained the final format on the tables through FLC which we should be following. Please refer to List of tornadoes in the 1999 Oklahoma tornado outbreak for how to appropriately format the tables. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

After the two months of working on the freaking table, no, I don't support bolding anymore. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 00:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
And, to add further, what we want is really irrelevant. The MOS says no bolding, therefore there is no bolding. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 01:32, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United States tornadoes from November to December 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roseburg, Indiana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Opinion wanted

I'm trying to decide on a damage picture to use for the November 17 outbreak. I'm stuck between these two http://www.crh.noaa.gov/images/ilx/events/17nov13/DSC07801.JPG http://www.crh.noaa.gov/images/ilx/events/17nov13/DSC07807.JPG from Washington, Illinois. Which do you prefer? TornadoLGS (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Missing EF4

There seems to be a missing EF4 tornado somewhere. You recently changed the count of EF4 tornadoes in 2013 from 8 to 9, but I can still only find 8 on the monthly lists. The discrepancy is on the May list. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fuzzy locating system

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fuzzy locating system. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

Nomination of List of United States tornadoes from November to December 2013 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of United States tornadoes from November to December 2013 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States tornadoes from November to December 2013 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:54, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Reason for reversion on the Nov 17 outbreak page

The Gifford, New Minden, Kokomo, Pekin and other entries lost sources and detail without reasoning. I'm not sure why you would replace a NWS damage survey page with an SPC reports map. I'm not sure if its accidental or on purpose, but I don't have the time to go back and and add all these refs and details back. Please read the sources if you are skeptical, but do not delete sourced, relevant info. Thank you. Sharkguy05 (talk) 03:01, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Sharkguy05

Japan Member Report

Two things USM, 1) It might be worth you double checking the stuff i added to the September 2 section, on the 2013 Tornadoes based on Japans member report to WMO. 2) The member report also highlights that Man-yi also caused several F0 and F1 tornadoes which caused 10 injuries/1000 homes damaged so im not sure its worth a section. Let me know what you think - Thanks :).Jason Rees (talk) 04:12, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United States tornadoes from June to July 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centerville, Wisconsin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Peter David

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Peter David. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Joplin

Careful, this edit was sourced (in bold) - but just not in the way we like it. However im not going to be RVing you, since it looks like it breaches WP:Not by using us a platform to promote the book.Jason Rees (talk) 20:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Comparison of S.M.A.R.T. tools

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Comparison of S.M.A.R.T. tools. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United States tornadoes from August to October 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holland, Wisconsin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sriracha sauce

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sriracha sauce. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

Spoilers

Hey, I saw your edit here, and while I think the simpler version is better, I noticed in your edit summary that you were also concerned about revealing spoilers, so I figured I'd point out Wikipedia's guideline about spoilers in case you weren't already aware of it. And if you were already aware, I apologize. Unrelated, I'm reminded that I opened a discussion about a minor content dispute you and I were involved in. If you were interested in participating, the discussion is still here. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:23, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Edinburgh

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Edinburgh. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alcoa High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Randall Cobb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Thomas Jefferson

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Thomas Jefferson. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Days of the year

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Days of the year. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Teenage pregnancy

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Teenage pregnancy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2013

The Farewell Sermon

Hello Sir, I am an Islamic Scholar and I can provide references for the changes made to the article with reference to the subject cited above. Please give me a chance to provide the references for the same and you can go through them for verification purpose.

Thanks & Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArshulMohammed (talk • contribs) 08:49, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

WP:PROF

As reviewing administrator, I removed you speedy deletion tag on Wit Busza. The accomplishments listed, being a Fellow of the American Physical society, and a Full professor at MIT, are quite sufficient to give some plausible indication of importance. (note that Fellow of this society like most such societies is an elected honor, as distinct from the routine rank of Member) In fact, I think that anyone claiming a professorship at any level at a university is at least a claim to plausible importance, whether or not they are actually notable.

In fact, he's actually notable under WP:PROF because of the Fellowship--and other factors, when the article gets developed further. In repeated decisions at AfD , almost all full professors at major universities have been found to be notable, tho that is not the actual standard. Note that WP:PROF is explicitly an alternative to the GNG-- a professor could be notable under either criterion.

If it's WP:PROF, there's not even a need for 3rd party sources, just reliable sources to prove the factors of notability ; An official CV is accepted as a reliable source for routine uncontroversial maters. Indeed, for BLPPROD, there's also no need for third party sources, just reliable ones that address the notability. BLPRPDO is concerned with verifiability, not notability, & its purpose is to prevent fraudulent claims.

I'm explaining this in some detail because you're doing god work here, and this is rather a specialized situation. DGG ( talk ) 10:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Cece Frey

Hello United States Man. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Cece Frey to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Jim McMahon

You are in direct violation of this websites standards. Failure to properly maintain your role may lead to immediate usurpation.

You have reverted user Theroux721's edits on Jim McMahon claiming "no sources have been used".

Sources have been indeed used, and are also unnecessary in a one sentence addition. Theroux721 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hello Everyone

Lisa Follis (PRISCILLA ) 04:25, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kathy Clark (American author), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page York College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Japan

Hi USM, I hope you liked my finding of the tornado stats for Man-yi, there may be a few more bits to come for it. Anyway per my interpretation of WP:Overlink, Japan should not be linked yet alone twice since it is a major geographic features just like the United States is but Vanuatu isnt.Jason Rees (talk) 21:16, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Unwarrented removal of sourced information

Once again, I have had to revert your "updates" to the November 17, 2013 tornado outbreak article. You either knowingly removed sourced information, simply did not read the sources carefully enough, or accidentally removed information without knowing. I will continue to do this as long as you keep indiscriminately removing relevant, sourced information. Feel free to add information or sources, but make sure you aren't removing info that other info users have added and sourced. That is inconsiderate. The summaries on that article are well-sourced are fine as is. Sharkguy05 (talk) 19:39, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Sharkguy05

I kept your sourcing changes and updated tornado count, but I put most of the detailed info back. You are going to have to learn that you don't own the severe articles on this website. People are going to add information and change wording whether you like it or not. As long as it is sourced, you don't have the grounds to do anything about that. I am willing to make compromises with you, but you are going to have to acknowledge when you don't have control over certain details that are being added. What details I add is my decision, not yours (as long as they are sourced/relevant, that is). That is simply how this website works. Sharkguy05 (talk) 01:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Sharkguy05

Please, just read the sources, I beg of you. Every detail that I write in those summaries are verifiable by looking at the sources. Look in the edit summaries for my most recent set of edits. I provided where to look in the source to find the information that verifies the what I added! Look and you will find it! Sharkguy05 (talk) 06:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Sharkguy05

A page you started (Tornadoes of 2014) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Tornadoes of 2014, United States Man!

Wikipedia editor StudiesWorld just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good work in advance.

To reply, leave a comment on StudiesWorld's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Please comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Canada Tornado

The reason i took it out was because there isnt any proof that it was associated with Hurricane Sandy. The source doesnt provide any proof that it was associated with Sandy, while the NHC used the line "only one tornado was reported in association with Sandy" in their TCR. If you would like to add it to a new section feel free, but im not sure i see it as noteworthy. Merry Christmas.Jason Rees (talk) 17:56, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

How are you proving that it was "more closely associated with a frontal boundary than with the nearby remnants of Hurricane Sandy." The source cited doesnt give any details on how it was formed.Jason Rees (talk) 18:32, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 26 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people/RfC: Change duration from 10 to 7 days

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people/RfC: Change duration from 10 to 7 days. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 December 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United States tornadoes in April 2011, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Georgia and Needmore, Kentucky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gun control

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gun control. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:United_States_Man/Archive_3&oldid=1168309493"